Saline and Sodic Soils in Wisconsin: The Sad Story of an Infiltration Pond for Waukesha County Storm Water Workshop 14 Mar 2012 Kyle Rudersdorf, David Evans, Glen Obear, Shane Griffith, Mackenzie Naber and Chris Long under the supervision of Phillip Barak, PhD Professor, Dept of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison [email protected]and with the sponsorship of The City of Middleton and the site owner
31
Embed
Saline and Sodic Soils in Wisconsin: The Sad Story of an ... · The Sad Story of an Infiltration Pond for Waukesha County Storm Water Workshop 14 Mar 2012 Kyle Rudersdorf, David Evans,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Saline and Sodic Soils in Wisconsin: The Sad Story of an Infiltration Pond
for Waukesha County Storm Water Workshop 14 Mar 2012
Kyle Rudersdorf, David Evans, Glen Obear, Shane Griffith, Mackenzie Naber and Chris Long
Madison & Dane Co. Public Health ROAD SALT REPORT – 2008/09 http://www.publichealthmdc.com/publications/documents/RoadSalt2009.pdf
Tons of salt applied or purchased by municipality, winter of 2008/9:27,000 Dane Co.9,000 City of Madison1,150 Town of Burke1,350 City of Middleton2,700 Others
Annual Madison salt application:10 – 25 tons/mile (Goal: 6 tons/mile)
Diagnostic techniques:
Salinity—
• Electrical conductivity (EC) of soil water or saturated soil extract (lab; dS/m or mmho/cm)
• Measurement of Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) by cation displacement
• Measurement of Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) in soil solution, saturated soil extract or irrigation water
Quirk and Schofield. 1957. J. Soil Science
Sampling at retention ponds, Aug 2010
Collection of cores from retention ponds (in background).
Bulk Density, Mg m-3
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Dep
th,
cm
0
5
10
15
20
25
4N vs Depth
3E vs Depth
Dispersion of 1-cm core segments in 1% sodium polymetaphosphate and mechanical agitation, here allowed to settle showing bands of sand, silt and suspended clay, for particle size determination by laser scattering—after removal of pea gravel by sieving.
Particle Size Distribution by Laser Scattering, gravel removed. Gravel was 10-15% of core segment, by wt.
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Dep
th,
cm
0
5
10
15
20
25
4N
3E
Typical remediation techniques:
Saline soils—Add high quality water and drain
Sodic and saline-sodic soils—Add gypsum, CaSO4·2H2O, and then drain
(Gypsum dissolves to provide a relatively high ionic concentration and provides Ca2+ to displace exchangeable Na+)
Contraindicated—adding high quality water and draining; likely to cause impermeability
Quirk and Schofield. 1957. J. Soil Science
Findings for a different West Madison retention pond, for which change in SAR and EC upon gypsum addition were calculated.
(Note persistence of high SAR and EC until May.)
Gypsum Added
Pond Water Characteristics: Gypsum Added9/1/200x 1/27/200x 5/12/200x
--mM-- SAR EC* SAR EC SAR EC --g/L--
0 0.9 0.1 11.7 1.2 11.6 1.0 0
5 0.2 1.3 4.8 2.4 4.3 2.2 0.9
10 0.2 2.3 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.2 1.7
Sat’d 0.1 3.1 2.9 4.4 2.6 4.2 2.6
* dS/m or mmho/cm
Falling head permeameterto measure Ksat on intact cores, using sequence of:
•tap water, •gypsum-saturated water, and •25 mM calcium chloride
cm d-1 cm h-1 cm s-1
Sand 504 21.0 5.83E-03
Sandy loam 62.6 2.59 7.19E-04
Loam 31.7 1.32 3.67E-04
Silt loam 16.3 0.68 1.89E-04
Clay 1.44 0.06 1.67E-05
Core 2E:
tapwater 0.33 0.01 3.86E-06
gypsum-sat’d 2.32 0.09 2.69E-05
25 mM CaCl2 2.35 0.10 2.72E-05
250 mM CaCl2 2.53 0.10 2.93E-05
Core 2N:
tapwater 0.52 0.02 6.06E-06
gypsum-sat’d 0.72 0.03 8.30E-06
Ksat measured with Falling Head Permeameters
Conclusions:
•This is an autopsy, not a resuscitation or remediation
• Engineered soil has puddled and structure has been lost
•Most of runoff water exits directly thru overflow pipes to sewers
•Retention ponds will never be able to remediate salts but will only pass it on, sooner or later, to groundwater or overflow drains
Replacing the soil of the ‘storm water quality basins’, which failed in two winters, should be accompanied by:
•Diversion of sodium chloride used for deicing parking lot, creating a ‘3-season basin’
•Routine addition of gypsum to ponds to raise SAR and reduce tendency to form sodicsoil (~2 g/L)
•Substitution of calcium chloride, calcium acetate, or potassium chloride for sodium chloride in parking lots draining into retention ponds will prevent occurrence of clogging due to sodicity
•Rating of engineered soils for sensitivity to sodicity if no change from sodium chloride is feasible.