Top Banner
Search in selected Domain Print this page || Email this page MANU/SC/0052/1964 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Writ Petition Nos. 31, 50, 52, 54, 81 and 82 of 1964 Decided On: 30.10.1964 Ae!!ants: Sajjan Singh Vs. "esondent: State of Rajasthan Hon'be !"#ges$ P.#. $a%endra& ad'ar, (.)., ).". *+do!'ar, -.N. Wancoo, *. ida/ at+!!a and "a& +ar Da/a!, )). S"bje%t$ Constit"tion Cat%h &o#s$ Ao!ition, Ac+isition, Acts and "e&+! ation, Affiration, A&rarian "efor , A&ric+!t+ra! and, Aendent of +ndaenta! "i&t, Aroriate Proceedin&, Attorne/ $enera!, #asic eat+re, (ertain c!ass, (ertiorari, (oensation, (oetent e&is!at+re, (onstit+ent Poer, (onstit+tion Aendent Act, (onstit+tiona! Aendent, (onstit+tiona! a, (onstit+tiona! iit ation, (onsti t+tio na! +est ion, (onst it+ti ona! 7a!idi t/, (ontr aent ion, (reati on of e&is!atie (o+nci!, Definition, De!e&ate, De!e&ation, Dero&ation of te +ndaenta! "i&t, Directie Princi!e, Discar&e, Doctrine of Pit and +stance, er&enc/, nforceent of "i&t, nforceent of te "i&t, ;ec+tie Action, ;ercise of e&is!atie Poer, ;istin& a, irst Aendent, rancise, +ndaenta! "i&t, $ie ffect <o, $+arantee, aeas (or +s , ar oni o+s (on str +ct ion , =+ni t/, =nd ian =nd ee nde nce Act , =nt erret atio n, =nt erener, =ss +e Wri t, )+r isdict ion, as =nconsiste nt, e& is! atio n, e& is!ati e Act ion, e&is!atie (o+n ci!, e&is !atie Poe r, ier t/, itera ! (onst r+ction, *anda +s, Nint ced +!e, Oat, Par!iaent, Par!iaent to Aen d te (onstit+ tion, Part =7, Part 7, P!enar / Poer, Poer of Par!iaent, Poer to =ss+e (ertain Writ, Poers of e&is!ation, Prii!e&e, Pri / (o+ nci !, Pro i iti on, +o War ranto, "ea sona! e "es tri ction, "ea sona! ene ss, "e& +!a tio n, "eedi es, "eedie s for nf orc ee nt, "eedi es for nfor ceent of "i& t, "eed/ , "eo e Diffic+ !ties, "eea!, "eea !ed, "eresentat ion, "i&t to *oe, "i& ts (onferred, "/ot ari ett!e ent, eenteent Aen dent , eent ced +!e, oe rei&n, o ere i&n t/, e cia ! Proced+re, ta te e& is!a t+r e, +s en sion of +nda en ta! "i& t, <erritor/ of =ndia, <e ;ec+tie, >nion )+diciar/, 7a!idation A%ts(R"es(O#es$ (onstit+tion of =ndia ?irst Aendent@ Act, 1951 Artic!e 31A and 31#B (onstit+tion of =ndia ?o+rt Aendent@ Act, 1955B (onstit+tion of =ndia ?eent Aendent@ Act, 1964 Artic!es 13?2@, 32, 226 and 368B =+&ned Act
23

Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Jun 03, 2018

Download

Documents

Puja Nair
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 1/23

Search in selected Domain

Print this page || Email this page

MANU/SC/0052/1964

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Writ Petition Nos. 31, 50, 52, 54, 81 and 82 of 1964

Decided On: 30.10.1964

Ae!!ants: Sajjan Singh

Vs.

"esondent: State of Rajasthan

Hon'be !"#ges$P.#. $a%endra&ad'ar, (.)., ).". *+do!'ar, -.N. Wancoo, *. ida/at+!!a and "a&+ar

Da/a!, )).

S"bje%t$ Constit"tion

Cat%h &o#s$

Ao!ition, Ac+isition, Acts and "e&+!ation, Affiration, A&rarian "efor, A&ric+!t+ra!

and, Aendent of +ndaenta! "i&t, Aroriate Proceedin&, Attorne/ $enera!, #asic

eat+re, (ertain c!ass, (ertiorari, (oensation, (oetent e&is!at+re, (onstit+ent Poer,

(onstit+tion Aendent Act, (onstit+tiona! Aendent, (onstit+tiona! a, (onstit+tiona!iitation, (onstit+tiona! +estion, (onstit+tiona! 7a!idit/, (ontraention, (reation of

e&is!atie (o+nci!, Definition, De!e&ate, De!e&ation, Dero&ation of te +ndaenta! "i&t,

Directie Princi!e, Discar&e, Doctrine of Pit and +stance, er&enc/, nforceent of

"i&t, nforceent of te "i&t, ;ec+tie Action, ;ercise of e&is!atie Poer, ;istin&

a, irst Aendent, rancise, +ndaenta! "i&t, $ie ffect <o, $+arantee, aeas

(or+s, aronio+s (onstr+ction, =+nit/, =ndian =ndeendence Act, =nterretation,

=nterener, =ss+e Writ, )+risdiction, as =nconsistent, e&is!ation, e&is!atie Action,

e&is!atie (o+nci!, e&is!atie Poer, iert/, itera! (onstr+ction, *anda+s, Nint

ced+!e, Oat, Par!iaent, Par!iaent to Aend te (onstit+tion, Part =7, Part 7, P!enar/

Poer, Poer of Par!iaent, Poer to =ss+e (ertain Writ, Poers of e&is!ation, Prii!e&e,

Pri/ (o+nci!, Proiition, +o Warranto, "easona!e "estriction, "easona!eness,"e&+!ation, "eedies, "eedies for nforceent, "eedies for nforceent of "i&t,

"eed/, "eoe Diffic+!ties, "eea!, "eea!ed, "eresentation, "i&t to *oe, "i&ts

(onferred, "/otari ett!eent, eenteent Aendent, eent ced+!e, oerei&n,

oerei&nt/, ecia! Proced+re, tate e&is!at+re, +sension of +ndaenta! "i&t,

<erritor/ of =ndia, <e ;ec+tie, >nion )+diciar/, 7a!idation

A%ts(R"es(O#es$

(onstit+tion of =ndia ?irst Aendent@ Act, 1951 Artic!e 31A and 31#B (onstit+tion of

=ndia ?o+rt Aendent@ Act, 1955B (onstit+tion of =ndia ?eent Aendent@ Act, 1964

Artic!es 13?2@, 32, 226 and 368B =+&ned Act

Page 2: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 2/23

O)e"e# ( Re)ese# b*$I.C. !la" Nath an# $rs. %s. State !& P'n(a) an# Anr.* +196,-2SC,62 

Case Note$

Constit"tion + )ai#it* of A%t + Ati%es ,-A an# ,- of Constit"tion of In#ia /Fist

A0en#0ent1 A%t2 -34-2 Constit"tion of In#ia /Fo"th A0en#0ent1 A%t2 -344 an#Ati%es -, /512 ,52 556 an# ,67 of Constit"tion of In#ia /Se)enteenth A0en#0ent1 A%t2

-368 + Se)enteenth A0en#0ent A%t 9ote%ts %etain A%ts 9asse# b* State :egisat"es

b* in%"#ing the0 in Ninth S%he#"e "n#e Ati%e ,- ;hi%h 0ight be assaie# b*

Ati%es -82 -32 o ,- + 9etitiones %haenge )ai#it* of Se)enteenth A0en#0ent A%t on

go"n# that it i<e* to affe%t 9o;e 9es%ibe# b* Ati%e 556 an# has not foo;e#

s9e%ia 9o%e#"e ai# #o;n in 9o)iso to Ati%e ,67 + s9e%ia 9o%e#"e "n#e 9o)iso

to Ati%e ,67 is to be foo;e# ;hen 9aia0ent inten#s to a0en# an* of 9o)isions of

Constit"tion %o)ee# b* Ca"ses /a1 to /e1 in%"#ing 9o)isions of Ati%e 556 +

Paia0ent see<s to a0en# f"n#a0enta ights soe* ;ith obje%t of e0o)ing an*

obsta%e in f"fi0ent of so%io e%ono0i% 9oi%* an# #oes not 9"9ot to %hange

9o)isions of Ati%e 556 + S"9e0e Co"t he#2 Ati%e 556 e0ains "n%hange# an#Se)enteenth A0en#0ent A%t is )ai#.

!UD=MENT

=ajen#aga#<a2 C.!.

1. <ese si; rit etitions ic ae een fi!ed +nder Art. 32 of te (onstit+tion, see' to

ca!!en&e te a!idit/ of te (onstit+tion ?1Ct Aendent@ Act, 1964. <e etitioners are

affected / one or te oter of te Acts added to te 9t ced+!e / te i+&ned Act, and

teir contention is tat te i+&ned Act ein& constit+tiona!!/ ina!id, te a!idit/ of te

Acts / ic te/ are affected cannot e saed. oe oter arties o are sii!ar!/

affected / oter Acts added to te 9t ced+!e / te i+&ned Act, ae interened at te

earin& of tese rit etitions, and te/ ae %oined te etitioners in contendin& tat te

i+&ned Act is ina!id. <e oints raised in te resent roceedin&s ae een e!aorate!/

ar&+ed efore +s / *r. eta!ad and *r. Pata' for te intereners and *r. *ani for te

 etitioners. We ae a!so eard te Attorne/ $enera! in re!/.

2. <e i+&ned Act consists of tree sections. <e first section &ies its sort tit!e. ection

2?i@ adds a roiso to c!a+se ?1@ of Art. 31A after te e;istin& roiso. <is roiso reads t+s

:

Proided f+rter tat ere an/ !a a'es an/ roision for te ac+isition / te tate of

an/ estate and ere an/ !and corised terein is e!d / a erson +nder is ersona!

c+!tiation, it sa!! not e !af+! for te tate to ac+ire an/ ortion of s+c !and as is itin

te cei!in& !iit a!ica!e to i +nder an/ !a for te tie ein& in force or an/ +i!din& or

str+ct+re standin& tereon or a+rtenant tereto, +n!ess te !a re!atin& to te ac+isition of

s+c !and, +i!din& or str+ct+re, roides for a/ent of coensation at a rate ic sa!!

not e !ess tan te ar'et a!+e tereof.

3. ection 2?ii@ s+stit+tes te fo!!oin& s+c!a+se for s+c!a+se ?a@ of c!a+se ?2@ of Art.

31A :

Page 3: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 3/23

?a@ te e;ression estate sa!!, in re!ation to an/ !oca! area, ae te sae eanin& as tat

e;ression or its !oca! e+ia!ent as in te e;istin& !a re!atin& to !and ten+res in force in

tat area and sa!! a!so inc!+de

?i@ an/ %a&ir, ina or +afi or oter sii!ar &rant and in te tates of *adras and -era!a, an/

 %ana, ri&tB

?ii@ an/ !and e!d +nder r/otari sett!eentB

?iii@ an/ !and e!d or !et for +roses of a&ric+!t+re or for +roses anci!!ar/ tereto,

inc!+din& aste !and, forest !and, !and for ast+re or sites of +i!din&s and oter str+ct+res

occ+ied / c+!tiators of !and, a&ric+!t+ra! !ao+rers and i!!a&e artisans.

4. ection 3 aends te 9t ced+!e / addin& 44 entries to it. <at is te nat+re of te

 roisions contained in te i+&ned Aendent Act.

5. =n dea!in& it te +estion ao+t te a!idit/ of te i+&ned Act, it is necessar/ toconsider te scoe and effect of te roisions contained in Art. 368 of te (onstit+tion,

 eca+se a !ar&e art of te controers/ in te resent rit etitions t+rns +on te decision of

te +estion as to at te tr+e scoe and effect of Art. 368 is. et +s read Art. 368 :

368. An aendent of tis (onstit+tion a/ e initiated on!/ / te introd+ction of a #i!!

for te +rose in eiter o+se of Par!iaent, and en te #i!! is assed in eac o+se / a

a%orit/ of te tota! eersi of tat o+se and / a a%orit/ of not !ess tan totirds

of te eers of tat o+se resent and otin&, it sa!! e resented to te President for is

assent and +on s+c assent ein& &ien to te #i!!, te (onstit+tion sa!! stand aended in

accordance it te ters of te #i!! :

Proided tat if s+c aendent see's to a'e an/ can&e in

?a@ Artic!e 54, Artic!e 55, Artic!e C3, Artic!e 162 or Artic!e 241, or

?@ (ater =7 of Part 7, (ater 7 of Part 7=, or (ater = of Part E=, or

?c@ an/ of te ists in te eent ced+!e, or

?d@ te reresentation of tates in Par!iaent, or

?e@ te roisions of tis Artic!e,

te aendent sa!! a!so re+ire to e ratified / te e&is!at+res of not !ess tan onea!f of

te tates / reso!+tions to tat effect assed / tose e&is!at+res efore te #i!! a'in&

 roision for s+c aendent is resented to te President for assent.

6. =t o+!d, t+s, aear tat te road scee of Art. 368 is tat if Par!iaent rooses to

aend an/ roision of te (onstit+tion not ensrined in te roiso, te roced+re

 rescried / te ain art of te Artic!e as to e fo!!oed. <e #i!! introd+ced for te

 +rose of a'in& te aendent in +estion, as to e assed in eac o+se / a a%orit/

of te tota! eersi of tat o+se and / a a%orit/ of not !ess tan totirds of teeers of tat o+se resent and otin&. <is re+ireent ost+!ates tat a i!! see'in& to

Page 4: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 4/23

aend te re!eant roisions of te (onstit+tion so+!d receie s+stantia! s+ort fro

eers of ot te o+ses. <at is / a tofo!d re+ireent as een rescried in tat

 ea!f. After te i!! is assed as aforesaid, it as to e resented to te President for is

assent and en e &ies is assent, te (onstit+tion sa!! stand aended in accordance it

te ters of te i!!. <at is te osition in re&ard to te aendent of te roisions of te

(onstit+tion to ic te roiso does not a!/.

C. =f Par!iaent intends to aend an/ of te roisions of te (onstit+tion ic are coered

 / c!a+ses ?a@ to ?e@ of te roiso, tere is a f+rter re+ireent ic as to e satisfied

 efore te i!! can e resented to te President for is assent. +c a i!! is re+ired to e

ratified / te e&is!at+res of not !ess tan onea!f of te tates / "eso!+tions to tat effect

 assed / te. =n oter ords, in resect of te Artic!es coered / te roiso, te f+rter

safe&+ard rescried / te roiso is tat te intended aendent so+!d receie te

aroa! of te e&is!at+res of not !ess tan onea!f of te tates. <at eans tat at !east

a!f of te tates constit+tin& te >nion of =ndia so+!d / a a%orit/ ote, aroe of te

 roosed aendent.

8. =t is oio+s tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts ensrined in Part === are not inc!+ded in te

 roiso, and so, if Par!iaent intends to aend an/ of te roisions contained in Artic!es 12

to 35 ic are inc!+ded in Part ===, it is not necessar/ to ta'e reco+rse to te roiso and to

satisf/ te additiona! re+ireents rescried / it. <+s far, tere is no diffic+!t/. #+t in

considerin& te scoe of Art. 368, it is necessar/ to reeer tat Art. 226, ic is

inc!+ded in (ater 7 of Part 7= of te (onstit+tion, is one of te constit+tiona! roisions

ic fa!! +nder c!a+se ?@ of te roisoB and so, it is c!ear tat if Par!iaent intends to

aend te roisions of Art. 226, te i!! roosin& to a'e s+c an aendent +st satisf/

te re+ireents of te roiso. <e +estion ic ca!!s for o+r decision is : at o+!d e

te re+ireent ao+t a'in& an aendent in a constit+tiona! roision contained in Part

===, if as a res+!t of te said aendent, te oers conferred on te i& (o+rts +nder Art.

226 are !i'e!/ to e affected F <e etitioners contend tat since it aears tat te oers

 rescried / Art. 226 are !i'e!/ to e affected / te intended aendent of te roisions

contained in Part ===, te i!! introd+ced for te +rose of a'in& s+c an aendent, +st

attract te roiso, and as te i+&ned Act as aditted!/ not &one tro+& te roced+re

 rescried / te roiso, it is ina!idB and tat raises te +estion ao+t te constr+ction of

te roisions contained in Art. 368 and te re!ation eteen te s+stantie art of Art. 368

it its roiso.

9. =n o+r oinion, te to arts of Art. 368 +st on a reasona!e constr+ction e aronised

it eac oter in te sense tat te scoe and effect of eiter of te so+!d not e a!!oedto e +nd+!/ red+ced or en!ar&ed. =t is +r&ed tat an/ aendent of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts

contained in Part === o+!d ineita!/ affect te oers of te i& (o+rt, rescried / Art.

226, and as s+c, te i!! roosin& te said aendent cannot fa!! +nder te roisoB

oterise te er/ o%ect of not inc!+din& Part === +nder te roiso o+!d e defeated. Wen

te (onstit+tiona'ers did not inc!+de Part === +nder te roiso, it o+!d e reasona!e to

ass+e tat te/ too' te ie tat te aendent of te roisions contained in Part === as

a atter ic so+!d e dea!t it / Par!iaent +nder te s+stantie roisions of Art.

368 and not +nder te roiso. =t as no do+t een s+&&ested tat te (onstit+tiona'ers

 eras did not anticiate tat tere o+!d e an/ occasions to aend te f+ndaenta!

ri&ts &+aranteed / Part ===. oeer tat a/ e, as a atter of constr+ction, tere is no

escae fro te conc!+sion tat Art. 368 roides for te aendent of te roisionscontained in Part === ito+t iosin& on Par!iaent on o!i&ation to adot te roced+re

Page 5: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 5/23

 rescried / te roiso. =t is tr+e tat as a res+!t of te aendent of te f+ndaenta!

ri&ts, te area oer ic te oers rescried / Art. 226 o+!d oerate a/ e red+ced,

 +t aarent!/, te (onstit+tiona'ers too' te ie tat te diin+tion in te area oer

ic te i& (o+rtsG oers +nder Art. 226 oerate, o+!d not necessari!/ ta'e te case

+nder te roiso.

10. On te oter and, if te s+stantie art of Art. 368 is er/ !iera!!/ and &enero+s!/

constr+ed and it is e!d tat een s+stantia! odification of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts ic

a/ a'e a er/ serio+s and s+stantia! inroad on te oers of te i& (o+rts +nder Art.

226 can e ade ito+t ino'in& te roiso, it a/ derie c!a+se ?@ of te roiso of its

s+stance. =n oter ords, in constr+in& ot te arts of Art. 368, te r+!e of aronio+s

constr+ction re+ires tat if te direct effect of te aendent of f+ndaenta! ri&ts is to

a'e a s+stantia! inroad on te i& (o+rtsG oers +nder Art. 226, it o+!d ecoe

necessar/ to consider eter te roiso o+!d coer s+c a case or not. =f te effect of te

aendent ade in te f+ndaenta! ri&ts on te oers of te i& (o+rts rescried /

Art. 226, is indirect, incidenta!, or is oterise of an insi&nificant order, it a/ e tat te

 roiso i!! not a!/. <e roiso o+!d a!/ ere te aendent in +estion see's toa'e an/ can&e, inter a!ia, in Art. 226, and te +estion in s+c a case o+!d e : does te

aendent see' to a'e a can&e in te roisions of Art. 226 F <e anser to tis +estion

o+!d deend +on te effect of te aendent ade in te f+ndaenta! ri&ts.

11. =n dea!in& it constit+tiona! +estions of tis caracter, co+rts &enera!!/ adot a test

ic is descried as te it and s+stance test. =n Attorne/$enera! for Ontario .

"eciroca! =ns+rers and oters ?H1924I A.(. 328@, te Pri/ (o+nci! as ca!!ed +on to

consider te a!idit/ of te "eciroca! =ns+rance Act, 1922 ?12 J 13 $eo. 5, Ont., c. 62@ and

s. 508c ic ad een added to te (riina! (ode of (anada / ss. C J 8 $eo. 5, c. 29

Do. *r. )+stice D+ff, o so'e for te Pri/ (o+nci!, osered tat in an en+ir/ !i'e te

one it ic te Pri/ (o+nci! as concerned in tat case, it as een fora!!/ !aid don

in %+d&ents of tis #oard, tat in s+c an in+ir/ te (o+rts +st ascertain te Gtr+e nat+re

and caracterG of te enactent : (itiKensG =ns+rance (o. . Parsons ?H1881I C A. (as 96@B

its Git and s+stanceG : >nion (o!!ier/ (o. . #r/den ?H1899I A.(. 580@B and it is te res+!t

of tis inesti&ation, not te for a!one, ic te stat+te a/ ae ass+ed +nder te and

of te dra+&tsan, tat i!! deterine itin ic of te cate&ories of s+%ect atters

entioned in ss. 91 and 92 te !e&is!ation fa!!sB and for tis +rose te !e&is!ation +st e

Gscr+tinised in its entiret/G : $reat West add!er/ (o. . <e -in& ?H1921I 2 A.(. 91,11C@. =t

is not necessar/ to +!ti!/ a+torities in s+ort of te roosition tat in considerin& te

constit+tiona! a!idit/ of te i+&ned Act, it o+!d e re!eant to in+ire at te it and

s+stance of te i+&ned Act is. <is !e&a! osition can e ta'en to e esta!ised / tedecisions of tis (o+rt ic ae consistent!/ adoted te ie e;ressed / )+stice D+ff,

to ic e ae %+st referred.

12. Wat ten is te it and s+stance of te i+&ned Act F or anserin& tis +estion, it

o+!d e necessar/ to reca!! er/ rief!/ te istor/ of Artic!es 31A and 31#. Artic!es 31A

and 31# ere added to te (onstit+tion it retrosectie effect / s. 4 of te (onstit+tion

?irst Aendent@ Act, 1951. =t is a atter of &enera! 'no!ed&e tat it ecae necessar/ to

add tese to roisions in te (onstit+tion, eca+se it as rea!ised tat !e&is!atie eas+res

adoted / certain tates for &iin& effect to te o!ic/ of a&rarian refor ic as

acceted / te art/ in oer, ad to face a serio+s ca!!en&e in te co+rts of !a on te

&ro+nd tat te/ contraened te f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed to te citiKens / Part ===.<ese eas+res ad een assed in #iar, >ttar Prades and *ad/a Prades, and teir

Page 6: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 6/23

a!idit/ as ieaced in te i& (o+rts in te said tree tates. <e i& (o+rt of Patna

e!d tat te re!eant #iar !e&is!ation as +nconstit+tiona!, i!st te i& (o+rts at

A!!aaad and Na&+r +e!d te a!idit/ of te corresondin& !e&is!atie eas+res assed in

>ttar Prades and *ad/a Prades resectie!/. Hee -aesar . tate of #iar ?A.=.".

1951 Pet 91@ and +r/a Pa! . >. P. $oernent MANU/UP/00,/1951I. <e arties

a&&rieed / tese resectie decisions ad fi!ed aea!s / secia! !eae efore te +ree(o+rt. At te sae tie, etitions ad a!so een referred efore te +ree (o+rt +nder

Art. 32 / certain oter Kaindars, see'in& te deterination of te sae iss+es. =t as at

tis sta&e tat Par!iaent to+&t it necessar/ to aoid te de!a/ ic o+!d necessari!/

ae een ino!ed in te fina! decision of te dis+tes endin& efore te +ree (o+rt,

and introd+ced te re!eant aendents in te (onstit+tion / addin& Artic!es 31A and 31#.

<at as te first ste ta'en / Par!iaent to assist te rocess of !e&is!ation to rin& ao+t

a&rarian refor / introd+cin& Artic!es 31A and 31#.

13. <e second ste in te sae direction as ta'en / Par!iaent in 1955 / aendin& Art.

31A / te (onstit+tion ?o+rt Aendent@ Act, 1955. <e o%ect of tis aendent as

to iden te scoe of a&rarian refor and to confer on te !e&is!atie eas+res adoted intat ea!f i+nit/ fro a ossi!e attac' tat te/ contraened te f+ndaenta! ri&ts of

citiKens. =n oter ords, tis aendent rotected te !e&is!atie eas+res in resect of

certain oter ites of a&rarian and socia! e!fare !e&is!ation, ic affected te rorietar/

ri&ts of certain citiKens. <at is o te second aendent as ade / Par!iaent. At te

tie en te first aendent as ade, Art. 31# e;ress!/ roided tat none of te Acts

and "e&+!ations secified in te 9t ced+!e, nor an/ of te roisions tereof, sa!! e

deeed to e oid or eer to ae ecoe oid on te &ro+nd tat te/ ere inconsistent

it or too' aa/ or arid&ed an/ of te ri&ts conferred / Part ===, and it added tat

notitstandin& an/ %+d&ent, decree or order of an/ (o+rt or tri+na! to te contrar/, eac

of te said Acts and "e&+!ations sa!! s+%ect to te oer of an/ coetent !e&is!at+re to

reea! or aend, contin+e in force. At tis tie, 19 Acts ere !isted in ced+!e 9, and te/

ere t+s effectie!/ a!idated. One ore Act as added to tis !ist / te Aendent Act

of 1955, so tat as a res+!t of te second aendent, te ced+!e contained 20 Acts ic

ere a!idated.

14. =t aears tat notitstandin& tese aendents, certain oter !e&is!atie eas+res

adoted / different tates for te +rose of &iin& effect to te a&rarian o!ic/ of te art/

in oer, ere effectie!/ ca!!en&ed. or instance, in -arii! -+ni'oan . tate of

-era!a ?H1962I +. 1 .(.". 829@, te a!idit/ of te -era!a A&rarian "e!ations Act ?=7 of

1961@ as ca!!en&ed / rit etitions fi!ed +nder Art. 32, and as a res+!t of te a%orit/

decision of tis (o+rt, te o!e Act as str+c' don. <is decision as rono+nced onDeceer 5, 1961.

15. =n A. P. -risnasai Naid+, etc. . <e tate of *adras H1964I C .(. ". 82@ te

constit+tiona!it/ of te *adras and "efors ?i;ation of (ei!in& on and@ Act ?No. 58 of

1961@ as +t in iss+e, and / te decision of tis (o+rt rono+nced on *arc 9, 1964, it

as dec!ared tat te o!e Act as ina!id. =t aears tat te "a%astan <enanc/ Act === of

1955 and te *aarastra A&ric+!t+ra! ands ?(ei!in& and o!din&s@ Act 2C of 1961 ae

 een sii!ar!/ dec!ared ina!id, and in conse+ence, Par!iaent to+&t it necessar/ to a'e

a f+rter aendent in Art. 31# so as to sae te a!idit/ of tese Acts ic ad een

str+c' don and of oter sii!ar Acts ic ere !i'e!/ to e str+c' don, if ca!!en&ed.

Wit tat o%ect in ie, te i+&ned Act as enacted s. 3 / ic 44 Acts ae een

Page 7: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 7/23

added to ced+!e 9. =f te i+&ned Act is e!d to e a!id and te aendent ade in te

ced+!e is fo+nd to e effectie, tese 44 Acts o+!d ae to e treated as a!id.

16. <+s, it o+!d e seen tat te &enesis of te aendents ade / Par!iaent in 1951 /

addin& Artic!es 31A and 31# to te (onstit+tion, c!ear!/ is to assist te tate e&is!at+res in

tis co+ntr/ to &ie effect to te econoic o!ic/ in ic te art/ in oer assionate!/ e!iees to rin& ao+t +c needed a&rarian refor. =t is it te sae o%ect tat te

second aendent as ade / Par!iaent in 1955, and as e ae %+st indicated, te

o%ect +nder!/in& te aendent ade / te i+&ned Act is a!so te sae. Par!iaent

desires tat a&rarian refor in a road and coreensie sense +st e introd+ced in te

interests of a er/ !ar&e section of =ndian citiKens o !ie in i!!a&es and ose financia!

 rosects are inte&ra!!/ connected it te +rs+it of ro&ressie a&rarian o!ic/. <+s, if te

 it and s+stance test is a!ied to te aendent ade / te i+&ned Act, it o+!d e

c!ear tat Par!iaent is see'in& to aend f+ndaenta! ri&ts so!e!/ it te o%ect of

reoin& an/ ossi!e ostac!e in te f+!fi!ent of te socioeconoic o!ic/ in ic te

 art/ in oer e!iees. =f tat e so, te effect of te aendent on te area oer ic te

i& (o+rtsG oers rescried / Art. 226 oerate, is incidenta! and in te resent case can e descried as of an insi&nificant order. <e i+&ned Act does not +rort to can&e te

 roisions of Art. 226 and it cannot e said een to ae tat effect direct!/ or in an/

arecia!e eas+re. <at is / e tin' tat te ar&+ent tat te i+&ned Act fa!!s

+nder te roiso, cannot e s+stained. =t is an Act te o%ect of ic is to aend te

re!eant Artic!es in Part === ic confer f+ndaenta! ri&ts on citiKens and as s+c it fa!!s

+nder te s+stantie art of Art. 368 and does not attract te roisions of c!a+se ?@ of te

 roiso. =f te effect of te aendent ade in te f+ndaenta! ri&ts on Art. 226 is direct

and not incidenta! and is of a er/ si&nificant order, different considerations a/ eras

arise. #+t in te resent case, tere is no occasion to entertain or ei& te said

considerations. <erefore te ain contention raised / te etitioners and te intereners

a&ainst te a!idit/ of te i+&ned Act +st e re%ected.

1C. <en, it is +r&ed tat te tr+e +rose and o%ect of te i+&ned Act is to !e&is!ate in

resect of !and, and !e&is!ation in resect of !and fa!!s itin te %+risdiction of te tate

e&is!at+res +nder ntr/ 18 of ist ==. <e ar&+ent is tat since te tate e&is!at+res a!one

can a'e !as in resect of !and, Par!iaent ad no ri&t to ass te i+&ned Act. <is

ar&+ent is ased on te ass+tion tat te i+&ned Act +rorts to e, and in fact is, a

 iece of !and !e&is!ation. <e sae ar&+ent is !aced efore +s in anoter for. =t is +r&ed

tat te scee of Artic!es 245 and 246 of te (onstit+tion c!ear!/ sos tat Par!iaent as

no ri&t to a'e a !a in resect of !and, and since te i+&ned Act is a !e&is!atie eas+re

in re!ation to !and, it is ina!id. <is ar&+ent, in o+r oinion, is isconceied. =n dea!in&it tis ar&+ent, a&ain, te it and s+stance test is re!eant. Wat te i+&ned Act

 +rorts to do is not to a'e an/ !and !e&is!ation +t to rotect and a!idate te !e&is!atie

eas+res in resect of a&rarian refors assed / te different tate e&is!at+res in te

co+ntr/ / &rantin& te i+nit/ fro attac' ased on te !ea tat te/ contraene

f+ndaenta! ri&ts. Par!iaent, in enactin& te i+&ned Act, as not a'in& an/

 roisions of !and !e&is!ation. =t as ere!/ a!idatin& !and !e&is!ations a!read/ assed / te

tate e&is!at+res in tat ea!f.

18. =t is a!so +r&ed tat inas+c as te i+&ned Act +rorts in s+stance to set aside te

decisions of co+rts of coetent %+risdiction / ic soe of te Acts added to te Nint

ced+!e ae een dec!ared to e ina!id, it is +nconstit+tiona!. We see no s+stance in tisar&+ent. =t is ard!/ necessar/ to easiKe tat !e&is!atie oer to a'e !as in resect

Page 8: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 8/23

of areas entr+sted to te !e&is!atie %+risdiction of different !e&is!atie odies, can e

e;ercised ot rosectie!/ and retrosectie!/. <e constit+ent oer conferred / Art.

368 on te Par!iaent can a!so e e;ercised ot rosectie!/ and retrosectie!/. On

seera! occasions, !e&is!at+res tin' it necessar/ to a!idate !as ic ae een dec!ared to

 e ina!id / (o+rts of coetent %+risdiction and in so doin&, te/ ae necessari!/ to

 roide for te intended a!idation to ta'e effect notitstandin& an/ %+d&ent, decree ororder assed / a co+rt of coetent %+risdiction to te contrar/. <erefore, it o+!d e id!e

to contend tat / a'in& te aendent retrosectie, te i+&ned Act as ecoe

constit+tiona!!/ ina!id.

19. =t as a!so een contended efore +s tat in decidin& te +estion as to eter te

i+&ned Act fa!!s +nder te roiso, e so+!d ta'e into acco+nt te oeratie ords in te

 roiso. <e roiso ta'es in cases ere te aendent so+&t to e ade / te re!eant

 i!! see's to a'e an/ can&e in an/ of te Artic!es secified in c!a+ses ?a@ to ?e@ of te

 roiso, and it is +r&ed tat on a fair readin& of c!a+ses ?@ and ?c@, it o+!d fo!!o tat te

i+&ned Act +rorts to do notin& e!se +t to see' to aend te roisions contained in

Art. 226. =t is not eas/ to areciate te stren&t or a!idit/ of tis ar&+ent. <is ar&+entis rea!!/ ased on ass+tion tat te !e&is!atie ecanis adoted / te Par!iaent in

 assin& te i+&ned Act introd+ces tis infirit/. <e ar&+ent oio+s!/ ass+es tat it

o+!d ae een oen to Par!iaent to a'e aroriate can&es in te different Artic!es of

Part ===, s+c as Artic!es 14 and 19, and if s+c a co+rse ad een adoted, te i+&ned Act

o+!d ae een constit+tiona!!/ a!id. #+t inas+c as te i+&ned Act +rorts to aend

on!/ Arts. 31A and 31# and see's to add seera! Acts to te Nint ced+!e, it does not

aend an/ of te roisions in Part ===, +t is a'in& an indeendent roision, and tat, it is

said, +st ta'e te case itin te scoe of te roiso. =t is c!ear tat at te i+&ned Act

 +rorts to do is to aend Art. 31A, and Artic!e 31A itse!f is inc!+ded in Part ===. =f

Par!iaent to+&t tat instead of adotin& te c+ersoe rocess of aendin& eac

re!eant Artic!e in Part ===, it o+!d e ore aroriate to add Artic!es 31A and 31#, and on

tat asis, it assed te ateria! roisions of te (onstit+tion ?irst Aendent@ Act, it

o+!d not e reasona!e to s+&&est tat tis etod rin&s te aendent itin te

 roiso. Wat te Par!iaent did in 1951, as afforded a a!id asis for f+rter aendents

ade in 1955 and no in 1964. =t o+!d e c!ear tat to+& te ar&+ents ic ae een

+r&ed efore +s in te resent roceedin&s ae een +t in different fors, asica!!/, te/

ino!e te consideration of te ain +estion eter te i+&ned Act fa!!s itin te

scoe of te roiso or notB and te anser to tis +estion, in o+r oinion, as to e a&ainst

te etitioners / te a!ication of te doctrine of it and s+stance.

20. <en, it is +r&ed tat te oer to aend, ic is conferred / Art. 368, does notinc!+de te oer to ta'e aa/ te f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / Part ===. <e contention

is tat te res+!t of te ateria! roisions of te i+&ned Act is to ta'e aa/ a citiKenGs

ri&t to ca!!en&e te a!idit/ of te Acts added to te Nint ced+!e, and tat eans tat in

resect of te said Acts, te re!eant f+ndaenta! ri&ts of te citiKens are ta'en aa/. We do

not tin' tere is an/ s+stance in tis ar&+ent. =t is tr+e tat te dictionar/ eanin& of te

ord aend is to correct a fa+!t or reforB +t in te conte;t, re!iance on te dictionar/

eanin& of te ord is sin&+!ar!/ inaroriate, eca+se at Art. 368 a+torises to e done

is te aendent of te roisions of te (onstit+tion. =t is e!!'non tat te aendent

of a !a a/ in a roer case inc!+de te de!etion of an/ one or ore of te roisions of te

!a and s+stit+tion in teir !ace of ne roisions. ii!ar!/, an aendent of te

(onstit+tion ic is te s+%ect atter of te oer conferred / Art. 368, a/ inc!+deodification or can&e of te roisions or een an aendent ic a'es te said

Page 9: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 9/23

 roisions ina!ica!e in certain cases. <e oer to aend in te conte;t is a er/ ide

 oer and it cannot e contro!!ed / te !itera! dictionar/ eanin& of te ord aend.

21. <e +estion ao+t te a!idit/ of te (onstit+tion ?irst Aendent@ Act as een

considered / tis (o+rt in ri an'ari Prasad in& Deo . >nion of =ndia and tate of #iar

?H1952I .(. ". 89@. =n tat case, te a!idit/ of te said Aendent Act as ca!!en&ed onseera! &ro+nds. One of te &ro+nds as tat te ne!/ inserted Artic!es 31A and 31# so+&t

to a'e can&es in Artic!es 132 and 136 in (ater =7 of Part 7 and Art. 226 in (ater 7

of Part 7=, and so, te/ re+ired ratification +nder c!a+se ?@ of te roiso to Art. 368. <is

contention as re%ected / tis (o+rt. Patan%a!i astri )., as e ten as, o so'e for te

+nanio+s (o+rt, osered tat te said Artic!es did not eiter in ters or in effect see' to

a'e an/ can&e in Art. 226 or in Artic!es 132 and 136, and e added tat it as not correct

to sa/ tat te oers of te i& (o+rts +nder Art. 226 to iss+e rits for te enforceent of

an/ of te ri&ts conferred / Part === or of tis (o+rt +nder Artic!es 132 and 136 to entertain

aea!s fro orders iss+in& or ref+sin& to iss+e s+c rits ere in an/ a/ affected. =n te

oinion of te (o+rt, te said oers reained %+st te sae as te/ ere eforeB on!/ a

certain c!ass of cases ad een e;c!+ded fro te +rie of Part ===. <e fact tat te co+rtsco+!d not e;ercise teir oers in resect of te said c!ass of cases, did not so tat te

 oers of te co+rts ere c+rtai!ed in an/ a/ or to an/ e;tent. =t on!/ eant tat certain

area of cases in ic te said oers co+!d ae een e;ercised, ad een itdran.

ii!ar!/, te ar&+ent tat te aendents ere ina!id eca+se te/ re!ated to !e&is!ation

in resect of !and, as a!so re%ected on te &ro+nd tat te i+&ned Artic!es 31A and 31#

ere essentia!!/ aendents of te (onstit+tion ic Par!iaent a!one ad te oer to

a'e.

22. =t o+!d t+s aear tat in s+stance te oints +r&ed efore +s in te resent

 roceedin&s are rea!!/ conc!+ded / te decision of tis (o+rt in an'ari PrasadGs case

?H1952I .(.". 89@. =t as, oeer, +r&ed efore +s d+rin& te co+rse of te earin& of tese

rit etitions tat e so+!d reconsider te atter and reie o+r ear!ier decision in an'ari

PrasadGs case. =t is tr+e tat te (onstit+tion does not !ace an/ restriction on o+r oers to

reie o+r ear!ier decisions or een to deart fro te and tere can e no do+t tat in

atters re!atin& to te decision of constit+tiona! oints ic ae a si&nificant iact on te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts of citiKens, e o+!d e reared to reie o+r ear!ier decisions in te

interest of +!ic &ood. <e doctrine of stare decisis a/ not strict!/ a!/ in tis conte;t and

no one can dis+te te osition tat te said doctrine so+!d not e eritted to eret+ate

erroneo+s decisions rono+nced / tis (o+rt to te detrient of &enera! e!fare. en so,

te nora! rinci!e tat %+d&ents rono+nced / tis (o+rt o+!d e fina!, cannot e

i&nored and +n!ess considerations of a s+stantia! and coe!!in& caracter a'e it necessar/to do so, e so+!d e s!o to do+t te correctness of reio+s decisions or to deart fro

te.

23. =t is +niersa!!/ reco&nised tat in re&ard to a !ar&e n+er of constit+tiona! ro!es

ic are ro+&t efore tis (o+rt for its decision, co!e; and diffic+!t +estions arise and

on an/ of s+c +estions, to ies are ossi!e. <erefore, if one ie as een ta'en /

tis (o+rt after at+re de!ieration, te fact tat anoter #enc is inc!ined to ta'e a different

ie a/ not %+stif/ te (o+rt in reconsiderin& te ear!ier decision or in deartin& fro it.

<e ro!e of constr+in& constit+tiona! roisions cannot e reasona!/ so!ed ere!/ /

adotin& a !itera! constr+ction of te ords +sed in te re!eant roisions. <e (onstit+tion

is an or&anic doc+ent and it is intended to sere as a &+ide to te so!+tion of can&in& ro!es ic te (o+rt a/ ae to face fro tie to tie. Nat+ra!!/, in a ro&ressie and

Page 10: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 10/23

d/naic societ/ te sae and aearance of tese ro!es are o+nd to can&e it te

ineita!e conse+ence tat te re!eant ords +sed in te (onstit+tion a/ a!so can&e teir

eanin& and si&nificance. <at is at a'es te tas' of dea!in& it constit+tiona!

 ro!es d/naic rater tan static. en so, te (o+rt so+!d e re!+ctant to accede to te

s+&&estion tat its ear!ier decisions so+!d e !i&tearted!/ reieed and dearted fro. =n

s+c a case te test so+!d e : is it aso!+te!/ necessar/ and essentia! tat te +estiona!read/ decided so+!d e reoened F <e anser to tis +estion o+!d deend on te

nat+re of te infirit/ a!!e&ed in te ear!ier decision, its iact on +!ic &ood, and te

a!idit/ and coe!!in& caracter of te considerations +r&ed in s+ort of te contrar/ ie.

=f te said decision as een fo!!oed in a !ar&e n+er of cases, tat a&ain is a factor ic

+st e ta'en into acco+nt.

24. =n te resent case, if te ar&+ents +r&ed / te etitioners ere to reai!, it o+!d !ead

to te ineita!e conse+ence tat te aendents ade in te (onstit+tion ot in 1951 and

1955 o+!d e rendered ina!id and a !ar&e n+er of decisions dea!in& it te a!idit/ of

te Acts inc!+ded in te Nint ced+!e ic ae een rono+nced / different i&

(o+rts eer since te decision of tis (o+rt in an'ari PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@ case asdec!ared, o+!d a!so e e;osed to serio+s %eoard/. <ese are considerations ic are ot

re!eant and ateria! in dea!in& it te !ea +r&ed / te etitioners efore +s in te resent

 roceedin&s tat an'ari PrasadGs case so+!d e reconsidered. =n ie of te said !ea,

oeer, e ae de!ierate!/ cosen to dea! it te erits of te contentions efore

referrin& to te decision itse!f. =n o+r oinion, te !ea ade / te etitioners for re

considerin& an'ari PrasadGs case in o!!/ +n%+stified and +st e re%ected.

25. =n tis connection, e o+!d !i'e to refer anoter asect of te atter. As e ae

a!read/ indicated, te rincia! oint ic as een +r&ed efore +s in tese roceedin&s is

tat te i+&ned Act is ina!id for te reason tat efore resentin& it to te President for

is assent, te roced+re rescried / te roiso to Art. 368 as not een fo!!oed, to+&

te Act as one ic fe!! itin te scoe of te roiso. =n oter ords, it as not

dis+ted efore +s tat Art. 368 eoers Par!iaent to aend an/ roision of te

(onstit+tion, inc!+din& te roisions in resect of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts ensrined in Part

===. <e ain contention as tat in aendin& te re!eant roisions of te (onstit+tion, te

 roced+re rescried / te roiso so+!d ae een fo!!oed. #+t it aears tat in an'ari

PrasadGs case, anoter ar&+ent as +r&ed efore tis (o+rt in ca!!en&in& te a!idit/ of te

(onstit+tion ?irst Aendent@ Act, and since e are e;ressin& o+r conc+rrence it te

said decisions, e tin' it is necessar/ to refer to te said ar&+ent and dea! it it, een

to+& tis asect of te atter as not een +r&ed efore +s in te resent roceedin&s.

26. =n an'ari PrasadGs case, it as contended tat to+& it a/ e oen to Par!iaent to

aend te roisions in resect of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts contained in Part ===, te

aendent, if ade in tat ea!f, o+!d ae to e tested in te !i&t of te roisions

contained in Art. 13?2@ of te (onstit+tion. <e ar&+ent as tat !a to ic Art. 13?2@

a!ies, o+!d inc!+de a !a assed / Par!iaent / irt+e of its constit+ent oer to aend

te (onstit+tion, and so, its a!idit/ i!! ae to e tested / Art. 13?2@ itse!f. =t i!! e

reca!!ed tat Art. 13?2@ roiits te tate fro a'in& an/ !a ic ta'es aa/ or arid&es

te ri&ts conferred / Part ===, and roides tat an/ !a ade in contraention of c!a+se ?2@

sa!!, to te e;tent of te contraention, e oid. =n oter ords, it as +r&ed efore tis

(o+rt in an'ari PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@ case tat in considerin& te +estion as to te

a!idit/ of te re!eant roisions of te (onstit+tion ?irst Aendent@ Act, it o+!d eoen to te art/ ca!!en&in& te a!idit/ of te said Act to +r&e tat in so far as te

Page 11: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 11/23

Aendent Act arid&es or ta'es aa/ te f+ndaenta! ri&ts of te citiKens, it is oid. <is

ar&+ent as, oeer, re%ected / tis (o+rt on te &ro+nd tat te ord !a +sed in Art.

13 +st e ta'en to ean r+!es or re&+!ations ade in e;ercise of ordinar/ !e&is!atie oer

and not aendents to te (onstit+tion ade in e;ercise of constit+ent oer it te res+!t

tat Art. 13 ?2@ does not affect aendents ade +nder Art. 368.

2C. =t is si&nificant tat Patan%a!i astri ). as e ten as, o so'e for te (o+rt, descried

as attractie te ar&+ent ao+t te a!icai!it/ of Art. 13?2@ to (onstit+tion Aendent

Acts assed +nder Art. 368, e;ained it c!ose!/, and +!tiate!/ re%ected it. =t as noticed in

te %+d&ent tat certain constit+tions a'e certain ri&ts eterna! and inio!ate, and / a/

of i!!+stration, reference as ade to Art. 11 of te )aanese (onstit+tion and Art. 5 of te

Aerican edera! (onstit+tion. =t as a!so noticed tat te ord !a in its !itera! sense,

a/ inc!+de constit+tiona! !a, +t it as ointed o+t tat tere is a c!ear dearcation

 eteen ordinar/ !a, ic is ade in e;ercise of !e&is!atie oer, and constit+tiona! !a

ic is ade in e;ercise of constit+ent oer. <e scee of te re!eant roisions of te

(onstit+tion as ten e;ained, and +!tiate!/, te (o+rt reaced te conc!+sion tat to+&

 ot Artic!es 13 and 368 are ide!/ rased, te aronio+s r+!e of constr+ction re+irestat te ord !a in Art. 13 so+!d e ta'en to e;c!+de !a ade in e;ercise of te

constit+ent oer.

28. =n o+r oinion, tis conc!+sion is ri&t, and as e are e;ressin& o+r f+!! conc+rrence

it te decision in an'ari PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@ case, e tin' it is necessar/ to

indicate o+r reasons for a&reein& it te conc!+sion of te (o+rt on tis oint, een to+&

te correctness of tis conc!+sion as not een +estioned efore +s in te co+rse of

ar&+ents. =f e ad fe!t a rea! diffic+!t/ in accetin& tis art of te conc!+sion, e o+!d

ae serio+s!/ considered te +estion as to eter te atter so+!d not e referred to a

!ar&er #enc for a f+rter e;aination of te ro!e.

29. <e first oint ic fa!!s to e considered on tis asect of te atter is te constr+ction

of Art. 368 itse!f. Part EE ic contains on!/ Art. 368 is descried as a Part dea!in& it

te Aendent of te (onstit+tionB and Art. 368 ic rescries te roced+re for

aendent of te (onstit+tion, e&ins / sa/in& tat an aendent of tis (onstit+tion a/

 e initiated in te anner tere indicated. =n o+r oinion, te e;ression aendent of te

(onstit+tion !ain!/ and +nai&+o+s!/ eans aendent of a!! te roisions of te

(onstit+tion. =t o+!d, e tin', e +nreasona!e to s+&&est tat at Art. 368 roides is

on!/ te ecanics of te roced+re to e fo!!oed in aendin& te (onstit+tion ito+t

indicatin& ic roisions of te (onstit+tion can e aended and ic cannot. +c a

restrictie constr+ction of te s+stantie art of Art. 368 o+!d e c!ear!/ +ntena!e.#esides, te ords +sed in te roiso +nai&+o+s!/ indicate tat te s+stantie art of te

artic!e a!ies to a!! te roisions of te (onstit+tion. =t is on tat asic ass+tion tat te

 roiso rescries a secific roced+re in resect of te aendent of te artic!es entioned

in c!a+ses ?a@ to ?e@ tereof. <erefore, e fee! no esitation in o!din& tat en Art. 368

confers on Par!iaent te ri&t to aend te (onstit+tion te oer in +estion can e

e;ercised oer a!! te roisions of te (onstit+tion. o te oer so+!d e e;ercised, as

to e deterined / reference to te +estion as to eter te roosed aendent fa!!s

+nder te s+stantie art of Art. 368, or attracts te roisions of te roiso.

30. =t is tr+e tat Art. 13?2@ refers to an/ !a in &enera!, and !itera!!/ constr+ed, te ord

!a a/ ta'e in a !a ade in e;ercise of te constit+ent oer conferred on Par!iaentB +t ain& re&ard to te fact tat a secific, +n+a!ified and +nai&+o+s oer to aend

Page 12: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 12/23

te (onstit+tion is conferred on Par!iaent, it o+!d e +nreasona!e to o!d tat te ord

!a in Art. 13?2@ ta'es in (onstit+tion Aendent Acts assed +nder Art. 368. =f te

(onstit+tiona'ers ad intended tat an/ f+t+re aendent of te roisions in re&ard to

f+ndaenta! ri&ts so+!d e s+%ect to Art. 13?2@, te/ o+!d ae ta'en te reca+tion of

a'in& a c!ear roision in tat ea!f. #esides, it sees to +s er/ +n!i'e!/ tat i!e

conferrin& te oer on Par!iaent to aend te (onstit+tion, it as te intention of te(onstit+tiona'ers to e;c!+de fro tat coreensie oer f+ndaenta! ri&ts

a!to&eter. <ere is no do+t tat if ord !a +sed in Art. 13?2@ inc!+des a !a in re!ation

to te aendent of te (onstit+tion, f+ndaenta! ri&ts can neer e arid&ed or ta'en

aa/, eca+se as soon as it is son tat te effect of te aendent is to ta'e aa/ or

arid&e f+ndaenta! ri&ts, tat ortion of te !a o+!d e oid +nder Art. 13?2@. We ae

no do+t tat s+c a osition co+!d not ae een intended / te (onstit+tiona'ers en

te/ inc!+ded Art. 368 in te (onstit+tion. =n constr+in& te ord !a occ+rrin& in Art.

13?2@, it a/ e re!eant to ear in ind tat, in te ords of -ania (.) in A. -. $oa!an .

<e tate of *adras ?H1950I .(.". 88 at . 100@, te inc!+sion of artic!e 13?1@ and ?2@ in te

(onstit+tion aears to e a atter of a+ndant ca+tion. en in teir asence, if an/ of te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts as infrin&ed / an/ !e&is!atie enactent, te (o+rt as a!a/s te oer to dec!are te enactent, to te e;tent it trans&resses te !iits, ina!id.

31. <e iortance and si&nificance of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts +st oio+s!/ e reco&nised

and in tat sense, te &+arantee to te citiKens contained in te re!eant roisions of Part ===,

can %+st!/ e descried as te er/ fo+ndation and te cornerstone of te deocratic a/ of

!ife +sered in tis co+ntr/ / te (onstit+tion. #+t can it e said tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts

&+aranteed to te citiKens are eterna! and inio!ate in te sense tat te/ can neer e

arid&ed or aended F =t is tr+e tat in te case of A - $oa!an ?H1950I .(.". 88, at . 100@

Patan%a!i astri, as e ten as, e;ressed te ie tat tere can e no do+t tat te eo!e

of =ndia ae, in e;ercise of teir soerei&n i!! as e;ressed in te Prea!e, adoted te

deocratic idea! ic ass+res to te citiKen te di&nit/ of te indiid+a! and oter cerised

+an a!+es as a eans to te f+!! eo!+tion and e;ression of is ersona!it/, and in

de!e&atin& to te !e&is!at+re, te e;ec+tie and te %+diciar/ teir resectie oers in te

(onstit+tion, resered to tese!es certain f+ndaenta! ri&ts, soca!!ed, = areend,

 eca+se te/ ae een retained / te eo!e and ade arao+nt to te de!e&ated oers,

as in te Aerican ode! ?. 198@. <is /otesis a/, ria facie, tend to so tat te

ri&t to aend tese f+ndaenta! ri&ts ested not in Par!iaent, +t in te eo!e of =ndia

tese!es. #+t it is si&nificant tat en te sae !earned )+d&e ad occasion to consider

tis +estion ore e!aorate!/ in =n re <e De!i as Act, 1912, ?H1951I .(.". C4C, at .

88384@ etc. e as eatica!!/ e;ressed te ie tat it is esta!ised e/ond do+t tat

te =ndian e&is!at+re, en actin& itin te !iits circ+scriin& its !e&is!atie oer, asand as intended to ae !enar/ oers of !e&is!ation as !ar&e and of te sae nat+re as

tose of te #ritis Par!iaent itse!f and no constit+tiona! !iitation on te de!e&ation of

!e&is!atie oer to a s+ordinate +nit is to e fo+nd in te =ndian (o+nci!s Act, 1861, or te

$oernent of =ndia Act, 1935, or te (onstit+tion of 1950. <e s+&&estion tat te

!e&is!at+res, inc!+din& te Par!iaent, are te de!e&ate of te eo!e of =ndia in o

soerei&nt/ ests, as re%ected / te !earned )+d&e en e osered tat te a;i

Gde!e&ates non otest de!e&areG is not art of te (onstit+tiona! !a of =ndia and as no ore

force tan a o!itica! recet to e acted +on / !e&is!at+res in te discar&e of teir

f+nction of a'in& !as, and te co+rts cannot stri'e don an Act of Par!iaent as

+nconstit+tiona! ere!/ eca+se Par!iaent decides in a artic+!ar instance to entr+st its

!e&is!atie oer to anoter in o it as confidence or, in oter ords, to e;ercise s+c oer tro+& its aointed instr+enta!it/, oeer re+&nant s+c entr+stent a/ e to

Page 13: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 13/23

te deocratic rocess. Wat a/ e re&arded as o!itica!!/ +ndesira!e is constit+tiona!!/

coetent. =t o+!d t+s aear tat so far as o+r (onstit+tion is concerned, it o+!d not e

 ossi!e to dea! it te +estion ao+t te oers of Par!iaent to aend te (onstit+tion

+nder Art. 368 on an/ teoretica! concet of o!itica! science tat soerei&nt/ ests in te

 eo!e and te !e&is!at+res are ere!/ te de!e&ate of te eo!e. Weter or not Par!iaent

as te oer to aend te (onstit+tion +st deend so!e!/ +on te +estion as to eterte said oer is inc!+ded in Art. 368. <e +estion ao+t te reasona!eness, or e;edienc/

or desirai!it/ of te aendents in +estion fro a o!itica! oint of ie o+!d e

irre!eant in constr+in& te ords of Art. 368.

32. =ncidenta!!/, e a/ a!so refer to te fact tat te (onstit+tiona'ers ad ta'en te

 reca+tion to indicate tat soe aendents so+!d not e treated as aendents of te

(onstit+tion for te +rose of Art. 368. <a'e, for instance Art. 4?2@ ic dea!s it !a

ade / irt+e of Art. 4?1@. Art. 4?2@ roides tat no s+c !a sa!! e deeed to e an

aendent of te (onstit+tion for te +roses of Art. 368. ii!ar!/, Art. 169?3@ roides

tat an/ !a in resect of te aendent of te e;istin& !e&is!atie aarat+s / te ao!ition

or creation of e&is!atie (o+nci!s in tates sa!! not e deeed to e an aendent of te(onstit+tion for te +roses of Art. 368. =n oter ords, !as fa!!in& itin te +rie of

Artic!es 4?2@ and 169?3@ need, not e assed s+%ect to te restriction iosed / Art. 368,

een to+&, in effect, te/ a/ ao+nt to te aendent of te re!eant roisions of te

(onstit+tion. =f te (onstit+tiona'ers too' te reca+tion of a'in& tis secific roision

to e;c!+de te a!icai!it/ of Art. 368 to certain aendents, it o+!d e reasona!e to

ass+e tat te/ o+!d ae ade a secific roision if te/ ad intended tat te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / Part === so+!d e co!ete!/ o+tside te scoe of Art. 368.

33. Aart fro te fact tat te ords +sed in Art. 368 are c!ear and +nai&+o+s in s+ort

of te ie tat e are ta'in&, on rinci!e a!so it aears +nreasona!e to s+&&est tat te

(onstit+tiona'ers anted to roide tat f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / te

(onstit+tion so+!d neer e to+ced / a/ of aendent. =t +st not e for&otten tat te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / Art. 19, for instance, are not aso!+teB te scee of tis

artic!e itse!f indicates tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / s+c!a+ses ?a@ to ?&@ of

c!a+se ?!@, can e a!id!/ re&+!ated in te !i&t of te roisions contained in c!a+ses ?2@ to ?6@

of Art. 19. =n oter ords, te road scee of Art. 19 is tofo!dB te f+ndaenta! ri&ts of

te citiKens are of arao+nt iortance, +t een te said f+ndaenta! ri&ts can e

re&+!ated to sere te interests of te &enera! +!ic or oter o%ects entioned resectie!/

in c!a+ses ?2@ to ?6@, and tat eans tat for secified +roses indicated in tese c!a+ses,

een te arao+ntc/ of f+ndaenta! ri&ts as to /ie!d to soe re&+!ation as conte!ated

 / te said c!a+ses. =t is ard!/ necessar/ to easise tat te +roses for icf+ndaenta! ri&ts can e re&+!ated ic are secified in c!a+ses ?2@ to ?6@, co+!d not ae

 een ass+ed / te (onstit+tiona'ers to e static and incaa!e of e;ansion. <e

(onstit+tiona'ers +st ae anticiated tat in dea!in& it socioeconoic ro!es

ic te !e&is!at+res a/ ae to face fro tie to tie, te concets of +!ic interest and

oter iortant considerations ic are te asis of c!a+ses ?2@ to ?6@, a/ can&e and a/

een e;andB and so, it is !e&itiate to ass+e tat te (onstit+tiona'ers 'no tat

Par!iaent so+!d e coetent to a'e aendents in tese ri&ts so as to eet te

ca!!en&e of te ro!es ic a/ arise in te co+rse of socioeconoic ro&ress and

dee!oent of te co+ntr/. <at is / e tin' tat een on rinci!e, it o+!d not e

reasona!e to roceed on te asis tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts ensrined in Part === ere

intended to e fina!!/ and i+ta!/ sett!ed and deterined once for a!! and ere e/ond tereac of an/ f+t+re aendent.

Page 14: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 14/23

34. et +s i!!+strate tis oint / reference to soe of te roisions of te (onstit+tion ?irst

Aendent@ Act, 1951 itse!f. #/ tis Act, Artic!es 15, 19 and 31 ere aended. One as

ere!/ to reca!! te +rose for ic it ecae necessar/ to aend Artic!es 15 and 19 to e

satisfied tat te can&in& caracter of te ro!es osed / te ords +sed in te

resectie artic!es co+!d not ae een effectie!/ et +n!ess aendent in te re!eant

 roisions as effectedB and /et, if te ar&+ent tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts are e/ond tereac of Art. 368 ere a!id, a!! tese aendents o+!d e constit+tiona!!/ ierissi!e.

<at, e tin' is not te tr+e +rort and effect of Art. 368. We are, terefore, satisfied tat

tis (o+rt as ri&t in re%ectin& te said ar&+ent in te case of an'ari Prasad ?H1952I

.(.". 89@.

35. <is +estion can e considered fro anoter oint of ie. <e ar&+ent tat te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts &+aranteed / Part === are eterna!, inio!ate, and e/ond te reac of Art.

368, is ased on to ass+tions. <e first ass+tion is tat on a fair and reasona!e

constr+ction of Art. 368, te oer to aend te f+ndaenta! ri&ts cannot e e!d to e

inc!+ded itin te constit+ent oers conferred on Par!iaent / te said Artic!e. We ae

a!read/ e!d tat a fair and reasona!e constr+ction of Art. 368 does not %+stif/ tisass+tion. <e oter ass+tion ic tis ar&+ent a'es, and +st of necessit/ a'e,

is tat if te oer to aend te f+ndaenta! ri&ts is not inc!+ded in Art. 368 as it stands, it

cannot eer e inc!+ded itin its +rieB eca+se +n!ess it is ass+ed tat te re!eant

 oer can neer e inc!+ded in Art. 368, it o+!d e +nrea!istic to roo+nd te teor/ tat

te f+ndaenta! ri&ts are eterna!, inio!ate, and not itin te reac of an/ s+se+ent

constit+tiona! aendent. =t is c!ear tat Art. 368 itse!f can e aended / Par!iaent,

to+& c!a+se ?e@ of te roiso re+ires tat efore aendin& Art. 368, te safe&+ards

 rescried / te roiso +st e satisfied. =n oter ords, een if te oers to aend te

f+ndaenta! ri&ts ere not inc!+ded in Art. 368, Par!iaent can, / a s+ita!e aendent of

Art. 368, ta'e tose oers. <+s, te second ass+tion +nder!/in& te ar&+ent ao+t te

i+ta!e caracter of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts is a!so not e!! fo+nded.

36. <ere is one ore oint to ic e o+!d !i'e to refer. =n te case of an'ari Prasad

?H1952I .(.". 89@ tis (o+rt as osered tat te +estion eter te !atter art of Art.

31# is too ide!/ e;ressed, as not ar&+ed efore it, and so, it did not e;ress an/ oinion

+on it. <is +estion as, oeer, een ar&+ed efore +s, and so, e o+!d !i'e to a'e it

c!ear tat te effect of te !ast c!a+se in Art. 31# is to !eae it oen to te resectie

!e&is!at+res to reea! or aend te Acts ic ae een inc!+ded in te Nint ced+!e. =n

oter ords, te fact tat te said Acts ae een inc!+ded in te Nint ced+!e it a ie

to a'e te a!id, does not ean tat te !e&is!at+res in +estion ic assed te said

Acts ae !ost teir coetence to reea! te or to aend te. <at is one conse+ence ofte said roision. <e oter ineita!e conse+ence of te said roision is tat if a

!e&is!at+re aends an/ of te roisions contained in an/ of te said Acts, te aended

 roision o+!d not receie te rotection of Art. 31# and its a!idit/ a/ e !ia!e to e

e;ained on te erits.

3C. #efore e art it tis atter, e o+!d !i'e to osere tat Par!iaent a/ consider

eter it o+!d not e e;edient and reasona!e to inc!+de te roisions of Part === in te

 roiso to Art. 368. =t is not eas/ to areciate / te (onstit+tiona'ers did not inc!+de

te said roisions in te roiso en Art. 368 as adoted. =n =n re : te #er+ari >nion

and ;can&e of nc!aes MANU/SC/0049/1960, tis (o+rt ad ointed o+t tat aendent

of Art. 1 of te (onstit+tion conse+ent +on te cession of an/ art of te territor/ of =ndiain fao+r of a forei&n tate, does not attract te safe&+ard rescried / te roiso to Art.

Page 15: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 15/23

368, eca+se neiter Art. Neiter 1 nor Art. 3 is inc!+ded in te !ist of entrenced roisions

of te (onstit+tion en+erated in te roisoB and it as osered tat it as not for tis

(o+rt to en+ire or consider eter it o+!d not e aroriate to inc!+de te said to

artic!es +nder te roiso, and tat it as a atter for Par!iaent to consider and decide.

ii!ar!/, it sees soeat anoa!o+s tat an/ aendent of te roisions contained in

Art. 226 so+!d fa!! +nder te roiso +t not an aendent of Art. 32. Artic!e 226 conferson i& (o+rts te oer to iss+e certain rits, i!e Art. 32, ic itse!f is a &+aranteed

f+ndaenta! ri&t, ena!es a citiKen to oe tis (o+rt for sii!ar rits. Par!iaent a/

consider eter te anoa!/ ic is aarent in te different odes rescried / Art.

368 for aendin& Artic!es 226 and 32 resectie!/, so+!d not e reedied / inc!+din& Part

=== itse!f in te roiso. =f tat is done, diffic+!t +estions as to eter te aendent ade

in te roisions of Part === s+stantia!!/, direct!/ and ateria!!/ affects te %+risdiction and

 oers of te i& (o+rts >nder Art. 226 a/ e easi!/ aoided.

38. =n te res+!t, e o!d tat te i+&ned Act is constit+tiona!!/ a!id. <e etitions,

accordin&!/, fai! and are disissed. <ere i!! e no order as to costs.

Hi#a*at"ah2 !.

39. = ae ad te rii!e&e of readin& te %+d&ent %+st de!iered / / !ord te (ief

)+stice. = a&ree it i tat tere is no force in te contention tat te 1Ct Aendent

re+ired for its a!id enactent te secia! roced+re !aid don in te roiso to Art. 368. =t

o+!d, of co+rse, ae een necessar/ if te aendent ad so+&t to a'e a can&e in Art.

226. <is eent+a!it/ cannot e said to ae arisen. Artic!e 226 reains +ncan&ed after te

aendent. <e roiso coes into !a/ on!/ en te artic!e is direct!/ can&ed or its

ait as s+c is so+&t to e can&ed. Wat te 1Ct aendent does is to en!ar&e te

eanin& of te ord GestateG in Art. 31A and to &ie rotection to soe Acts assed / te

tate e&is!at+res / inc!+din& te in te Nint ced+!e +nder te sie!d of Art, 31#.

<ese Acts rooted a&rarian refor and +t for te inc!+sion in te Nint ced+!e te/

i&t e assai!ed / te roisions of Artic!es 14, 19 or 31 of te (onstit+tion. oe of te

Acts ere in fact s+ccessf+!!/ assai!ed +t te aendent a'es te effectie and

in+!nera!e to te tree artic!es notitstandin& Art. 13 of te (onstit+tion. =n sri an'ari

PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@ case en te (onstit+tionI ?irst Aendent@ Act as assed

and Artic!es 31A and 31# and Nint ced+!e ere introd+ced, te effect of tat

aendent on Art. 226 as considered and it as e!d tat te Aendent ad not te

effect is+a!ised / te roiso to Art. 368. <e reasonin& in tat case on tis oint a!ies

+tatis +tandis to te 1Ct Aendent.

40. = find, oeer, soe diffic+!t/ in accetin& a art of te reasonin& in an'ari PrasadGs

case and / +rose in ritin& a searate %+d&ent is to sa/ tat = decide te resent cases

ito+t te assistance of tat reasonin&. = sa!! rief!/ indicate at tat reasonin& is and

/ = ae do+ts. =n an'ari PrasadGs case it as contended tat / Art. 13?2@ te

+ndaenta! "i&ts in Part === of te (onstit+tion ere +t e/ond te reac of Art. 368 and

o+tside te oer of aendent conferred on Par!iaent / Art. 368. <is ar&+ent as

considered attractie +t as re%ected eca+se of certain iortant considerations ic

it as e!d ointed to te oosite conc!+sion. <o reasons a!one aear to ae ei&ed

it tis (o+rt. <e first is tat as constit+tiona! !a is distin&+isa!e fro oter +nicia!

!as and as tere is no c!ear indication to e fo+nd tat te +ndaenta! "i&ts are

i+ne fro constit+tiona! aendent, on!/ te inasion of te +ndaenta! "i&ts /

Page 16: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 16/23

!as oter tan constit+tiona! !as +st e te s+%ect of te roiition in Art. 13?2@. Art.

13 a/ e +oted at tis sta&e :

13. as inconsistent it or in dero&ation of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts.

?1@ A!! !as in force in te territor/ of =ndia iediate!/ efore te coenceent of tis(onstit+tion, in so far as te/ are inconsistent it te roisions of tis Part, sa!!, to te

e;tent of s+c inconsistenc/, e oid.

?2@ <e tate sa!! not a'e an/ !a ic ta'es aa/ or arid&es te ri&ts conferred /

tis Part and an/ !a ade in contraention of tis c!a+se sa!!, to te e;tent of te

contraention, e oid.

?3@ =n tis artic!e, +n!ess te conte;t oterise re+ires,

?a@ !a inc!+des an/ Ordinance, order, /e!a, r+!e, re&+!ation, notification, c+sto or

+sa&e ain& in te territor/ of =ndia te force of !aB

?@ .......

41. =t is tr+e tat tere is no co!ete definition of te ord !a in te artic!e +t it is

si&nificant tat te definition does not see' to e;c!+de constit+tiona! aendents ic it

o+!d ae een eas/ to indicate in te definition / addin& +t sa!! not inc!+de an

aendent of te (onstit+tion. <e eanin& is a!so so+&t to e en!ar&ed not c+rtai!ed. <e

eanin& of Art. 13 t+s deends on te sense in ic te ord !a in Art. 13?2@ is to e

+nderstood. =f an aendent can e said to fa!! itin te ter !a, te +ndaenta!

"i&ts ecoe eterna! and inio!ate to orro te !an&+a&e of te )aanese (onstit+tion.Artic!e 13 is ten on ar it Art. 5 of te Aerican edera! (onstit+tion is its i+ta!e

 roiition as !on& as it stands. #+t te restricted eanin& &ien to te ord !a reents

tis to e e!d. <ere is a riori reasonin& ito+t consideration of te te;t of te artic!e in

Part ===. <e Artic!e +se te !an&+a&e of eranenc/. = a of oinion tat tere are

indications in te (onstit+tion ic needed to e considered and = sa!! ention soe of

te !ater as i!!+strations.

42. <e ne;t reason as tat Art. 368 as erfect!/ &enera! and a!!oed aendent of

te (onstit+tion, ito+t an/ e;cetion atsoeer and terefore Art. 13?2@ did not coer a

constit+tiona! aendent. =t as osered in tis connection tat if it as considered

necessar/ to sae +ndaenta! "i&ts a c!ear roiso in Art. 368 o+!d ae cone/ed tisintention ito+t an/ do+t. <o / ind te easiest and ost oio+s a/ as to sa/ tat

te ord !a in Art. 13 did not inc!+de an aendent of te (onstit+tion. =t as fina!!/

conc!+ded as fo!!os :

... =n sort, e ae ere to artic!es eac of ic is ide!/ rased, +t conf!icts in its

oeration it te oter. aronio+s constr+ction re+ires tat one so+!d e read as

contro!!ed and +a!ified / te oter. ain& re&ard to te considerations aerted to aoe,

e are of oinion tat in te conte;t of artic!e 13 G!aG +st e ta'en to ean r+!es or

re&+!ations ade in e;ercise of ordinar/ !e&is!atie oer and not aendents to te

(onstit+tion ade in e;ercise of constit+ent oer, it te res+!t te artic!e 13?2@ does not

affect aendents ade +nder artic!e 368.

Page 17: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 17/23

43. At te earin& re!iance as not !aced on Art. 13?2@ +t easis as !aid on te

aendent of Art. 226. *r. ". 7. *ani did, oeer, refer to te roision for te

s+sension of +ndaenta! "i&ts as soin& tat +n!ess s+sended in an eer&enc/, Part

=== +st stand +ncan&ed and e referred to Art. 32?4@. or te disosa! of tese cases =

indicate / ie tat on te ar&+ents efore +s = +st o!d tat as decided in an'ari

PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@ case Art. 226 is not so+&t to e can&ed / te 1CtAendent. #+t = a'e it c!ear tat = +st not e +nderstood to ae s+scried to te ie

tat te ord !a in Art. 13?2@ does not contro! constit+tiona! aendents. = resere /

oinion on tat case for = areend tat it deends on o ide is te ord !a in tat

Artic!e. <e roiition in tat artic!e a/ ae to e read in te !i&t of dec!arations in te

ario+s artic!es in Part === to find o+t te roer eanin&. <o+& = do not e;ress a fina!

oinion = &ie a fe e;a!es. <a'e for instance Art. 32. =t reads :

32. "eedies for enforceent of ri&ts.

?1@ <e ri&t to oe te +ree (o+rt / aroriate roceedin&s for te enforceent of

te ri&ts conferred / tis Part is &+aranteed.

?2@ <e +ree (o+rt sa!! ae oer to iss+e directions or orders or rits in te nat+re of

aeas cor+s, anda+s, roiition, +o arranto and certiorari, iceer a/ e

aroriate, for te enforceent of an/ of te ri&ts conferred / tis Part.

?3@ Wito+t re%+dice to te oers conferred on te +ree (o+rt / c!a+ses ?1@ and ?2@,

Par!iaent a/ / !a eoer an/ oter co+rt to e;ercise itin te !oca! !iits of its

 %+risdiction a!! or an/ of te oers e;ercisa!e / te +ree (o+rt +nder c!a+se ?2@.

?4@ <e ri&t &+aranteed / tis artic!e sa!! not e s+sended e;cet as oterise roided

for / te (onstit+tion.

44. =t is ria facie at !east, reasona!e to tin' tat if c!s. ?1@, and ?4@ of tis Artic!e ere

inc!+ded in Part EE ?Aendent of te (onstit+tion@ tat o+!d ae ade te &+arantee

aso!+te a&ainst an/ aendent. =t is a atter for consideration eter tis &+arantee is an/

te !ess eca+se te artic!e is in anoter Part F <e first c!a+se ass+res a &+aranteed reed/.

<at &+arantee is e+a!!/ a&ainst !e&is!atie and e;ec+tie actions. Part === is f+!! of

dec!arations of at te !e&is!at+re can do and at it cannot do. <e &+arantee coers a!!

tose actions ic are not oen to te !e&is!at+re and te e;ec+tie. =f it e e!d tat te

&+arantee is inio!a!e o+!d not e &+arantee of te reed/ a'e te ri&ts e+a!!/

 rotected F

45. Anoter roision, nae!/, te Prea!e of te (onstit+tion is e+a!!/ ita! to o+r od/

 o!itic. =n in re : <e #er+ari >nion and ;can&e of nc!aes MANU/SC/0049/1960 it is

e!d tat a!to+& te rea!e is te 'e/ to te ind of te (onstit+tiona'ers, it does not

for art of te (onstit+tion. Peras, in one sense, it does not +t, in anoter sense, it does.

O+r rea!e is ore a'in in nat+re to te Aerican Dec!aration of =ndeendence ?)+!/ 4,

1CC6@ ten to te rea!e to te (onstit+tion of te >nited tates. =t does not a'e an/

&rant of oer +t it &ies a direction and +rose to te (onstit+tion ic is ref!ected in

Parts === and =7. =s it to e ia&ined tat a totirds a%orit/ of te to o+ses at an/ tie

is a!! tat is necessar/ to a!ter it ito+t een cons+!tin& te tates F =t is not een inc!+ded in

te roiso to Art. 368 and it is diffic+!t to tin' tat as it as not te rotection of te roiso it +st e itin te ain art of Art. 368.

Page 18: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 18/23

46. A&ain, Art. 13?1@ rendered oid te !as in force in te territor/ of =ndia ic conf!icted

it Part ===. (an it e said tat Art. 13 a/ e reea!ed retrosectie!/ and a!! tose stat+es

 ro+&t ac' to !ife F #eca+se of s+ccessie aendents e ae seen an/ faces of Art.

31A. =t is for consideration eter Art. 13 as not intended to strea!ine a!! e;istin& and

f+t+re !as to te asic re+ireents of Part ===. Or is te door !eft oen for reersin& te

 o!ic/ of o+r (onstit+tion fro tie to tie / !e&is!atin& it te i&&er a%orit/ at an/&ien tie not direct!/ +t / constit+tiona! aendents F =t is ossi!e to %+stif/ s+c

aendents it te aid of te roisos in Art. 19 ic erit te a'in& of !as

restrictin& te freedos +t not / i&norin& Art. 13 and re!/in& so!e!/ on Art. 368.

4C. = a aare tat in A - $oa!an . tate of *adras ?H1950I .(.". 88 at . 100@ -ania ( )

said :

... te inc!+sion of artic!e 13?1@ and ?2@ in te (onstit+tion aears to e a atter of

a+ndant ca+tion. en in teir asence, if an/ of te f+ndaenta! ri&ts as infrin&ed /

an/ !e&is!atie enactent, te (o+rt as a!a/s te oer to dec!are te enactent, to te

e;tent it trans&resses te !iits ina!id.

48. <e oseration is not c!ear in its eanin&. <ere as +ndo+ted!/ a &reat +rose ic

tis artic!e aciees. =t is roa!e tat far fro e!itt!in& te iortance of Art. 13 te

!earned (ief )+stice eant rater to easiKe te iortance and te coandin& osition

of +ndaenta! "i&ts in tat een ito+t Art. 13 te/ o+!d ae te sae effect on oter

!as. <o o!d tat Art. 13 is fraed ere!/ / a/ of a+ndant ca+tion, and seres no

additiona! or intrinsic f+nction of its on, i&t, / ana!o&/ ers+ade +s to sa/ te sae of

Art. 32?1@ eca+se tis (o+rt o+!d do its d+t/ +nder Art. 32?2@ een in te asence of te

&+arantee.

49. = o+!d re+ire stron&er reasons tat tose &ien in an'ari PrasadGs ?H1952I .(.". 89@

case to a'e e accet te ie tat +ndaenta! "i&ts ere not rea!!/ f+ndaenta! +t

ere intended to e itin te oers of aendent in coon it te oter arts of te

(onstit+tion and ito+t te conc+rrence of te tates. No do+t Art. 19 / c!a+ses

n+ered 2 to 6 a!!os a c+rtai!ent of ri&ts in te +!ic interest. <is sos tat Part ===

is not static. =t is+a!ises can&e and ro&ress +t at te sae tie it reseres te indiid+a!

ri&ts. <ere is ard!/ an/ eas+re of refor ic cannot e introd+ced reasona!/, te

&+arantee of indiid+a! !iert/ notitstandin&. en te a&rarian refors co+!d ae een

 art!/ carried o+t ito+t Artic!e 31A and 31# +t te/ o+!d ae cost ore to te +!ic

e;ce+er. <e ri&ts of societ/ are ade arao+nt and te/ are !aced aoe tose of te

indiid+a!. <is is as it so+!d e. #+t restrictin& te +ndaenta! "i&ts / resort to c!s. 2 to6 of Art. 19 is one tin& and reoin& te ri&ts fro te (onstit+tion or dei!itatin& te /

an aendent is +ite anoter. <is is te i!ication of an'ari PrasadGs case. =t is tr+e tat

s+c tin&s o+!d neer e, +t one is concerned to 'no if s+c a doin& o+!d e ossi!e.

50. =t a/ e said tat te ords of Art. 368 are +ite e;!icit. Art. 3 6 8 does not &ie oer

to aend an/ roision of te (onstit+tion. At !east te artic!e does not sa/ so. Ana!/sed

 / te acceted canons of interretation it is fo+nd to !a/ don te anner of te aendent

of tis (onstit+tion +t / tis (onstit+tion it does not ean eac indiid+a! artic!e

ereer fo+nd and ateer its !an&+a&e and sirit. <e (onstit+tion itse!f indicates in

soe !aces a contrar/ intention e;ress!/ ?ee Artic!es 4, 169 and te forer Art. 240@ and

in soe oters / i!ication ?ee Art. 11@. Wat Art. 368 does is to !a/ don te anner ofaendent and te necessar/ conditions for te effectieness of te aendent. <e

Page 19: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 19/23

contrast eteen te oenin& art and te roiso does not so tat at is o+tside te

 roiso is necessari!/ itin te oers of aendent. <e roiso ere!/ +ts o+tside te

e;c!+sie Poer of Par!iaent to aend tose roisions on ic o+r federa! str+ct+re rests.

=t a'es it inc+ent tat a a%orit/ of te tates so+!d a!so a&ree. <e roiso a!so

 reseres te str+ct+re of te i&er %+diciar/ so ita! to a ritten (onstit+tion and to a

Deocrac/ s+c as o+rs. #+t te artic!e no ere sa/s tat te rea!e and eer/ sin&!eartic!e of te (onstit+tion can e aended / totirds a%orit/ desite an/ eranenc/ in

te !an&+a&e and desite an/ istorica! fact or sentient.

51. <e (onstit+tion &ies so an/ ass+rances in Part === tat it o+!d e diffic+!t to tin'

tat te/ ere te !a/ tin&s of a secia! a%orit/. <o o!d tis o+!d ean ria facie tat

te ost so!en arts of o+r (onstit+tion stand on te sae footin& as an/ oter roision

and een on a !ess fir &ro+nd tan one on ic te artic!e entioned in te roiso stand.

<e anao!/ tat Art. 226 so+!d e soeat rotected +t not Art. 32 +st &ie +s a+se.

Artic!e 32 does not erect a sie!d a&ainst riate cond+ct +t a&ainst state cond+ct inc!+din&

te !e&is!at+res ?ee Art. 12@. (an te !e&is!at+re ta'e aa/ tis sie!d F Peras / adotin&

a !itera! constr+ction of Art. 368 one can sa/ tat. #+t = a not inc!ined to !a/ a&raarianGs ro!e. As at resent adised = can on!/ sa/ tat te oer to a'e aendents

o+&t not ordinari!/ to e a eans of escae fro aso!+te constit+tiona! restrictions.

52. or tese reasons to+& = a&ree it te order roosed, = o+!d not !i'e to e

+nderstood to ae e;ressed a fina! oinion on te asect of te case o+t!ined aoe.

M"#ho<a2 !.

53. = ae seen te %+d&ents of / ord te (ief )+stice and / roter ida/at+!!a ).

and = a&ree tat te Writ Petitions so+!d e disissed.

54. Of te ario+s contentio+s raised in an'ari Prasad in& Deo . >nion of =ndia and tate

of #iar ?H1952I .(.". 89@ in ic te (onstit+tion ?irst Aendent@ Act, 1951 as

ca!!en&ed efore tis (o+rt on!/ to o+!d e re!eant in te conte;t of te (onstit+tion

?eenteent Aendent@ Act, 1964. <e/ are : ?a@ eter te Aendent Act in so far as

it +rorts to ta'e aa/ or arid&e te ri&tG conferred / Part === of te (onstit+tion fa!!s

itin te roiition of Art. 13?2@ and ?@ eter Arts. 31A and 31# see' to a'e can&es

in Arts. 132, 136 or 226 or in an/ of te ists in te eent ced+!e and, terefore, te

re+ireents of te roiso to Art. 368 ad to e satisfied. #ot tese contentions ere

ne&atied / tis (o+rt. <e first contention as not een raised in te ar&+ents efore +s

and te attac' on te eenteent Aendent Act as ased on!/ on te second contention.*ost of te &ro+nds ic !earned co+nse! +r&ed efore +s ere te sae as tose +r&ed in

te ear!ier case. oe additiona! ar&+ents ere a!so +r&ed efore +s +t, as / ord te

(ief )+stice as ointed o+t, te/ are +ns+stantia!. An attet as ade / *r. *ani,

!earned co+nse! for te etitioners, to ers+ade +s to reconsider te decision in te ear!ier case

it re&ard to te second contention. As, oeer, no case as ade o+t / i for

reconsideration of tat decision e intiated to i tat e do not roose to reconsider it.

55. ince / ord te (ief )+stice in is %+d&ents as dea!t it te first contention a!so

and e;ressed te ie tat te reio+s decision is ri&t = tin' it necessar/ to sa/, art!/ for

te reasons stated / / !earned roter ida/at+!!a ). and art!/ for soe oter reasons,

tat = o+!d resere / oinion on tis +estion and tat = do not re&ard at tis (o+rt ase!d in tat case as te !ast ord.

Page 20: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 20/23

56. =t sees to e tat in a'in& te ie tat te ord !a occ+rrin& in Art. 13?2@ of te

(onstit+tion does not inc!+de an aendent to te (onstit+tion tis (o+rt as not orne in

ind soe iortant considerations ic o+!d e re!eant for te +rose. <e !an&+a&e

of Art. 368 is !ain eno+& to so tat te action of Par!iaent in aendin& te

(onstit+tion is a !e&is!atie act !i'e one in e;ercise of its nora! !e&is!atie oer. <e on!/

difference in resect of an aendent of te (onstit+tion is tat te #i!! aendin& te(onstit+tion as to e assed / a secia! a%orit/ ?ere = ae in ind on!/ tose

aendents ic do not attract te roiso to Art. 368@. <e res+!t of a !e&is!atie action of

a !e&is!at+re cannot e oter tan G!aG and, terefore, it sees to e tat te fact tat te

!e&is!ation dea!s it te aendent of a roision of te (onstit+tion o+!d not a'e its

res+!t an/ te !ess a G!aG. Artic!e 368 does not sa/ tat en Par!iaent a'es an

aendent to te (onstit+tion it ass+es a different caacit/, tat of a constit+ent od/. As

s+&&ested / / !earned roter ida/at+!!a ). it is oen to do+t eter tis Artic!e

confers an/ s+c oer +on Par!iaent. #+t een ass+in& tat it does, it can on!/ e

re&arded as an additiona! !e&is!atie oer.

5C. <en a&ain i!e te (onstit+tion as ori&ina!!/ fraed can on!/ e interreted / a co+rtof !a and te a!idit/ of no roision terein can e ca!!en&ed te sae cannot e said of

an aendent to te (onstit+tion. or an aendent to e treated as a art of te

(onstit+tion it +st in fact and in !a ae ecoe a art of te (onstit+tion. Weter it as

 ecoe a art of te (onstit+tion is t+s a +estion oen to %+dicia! reie. =t is oio+s tat

an aendent +st co!/ it te re+ireents of te (onstit+tion and so+!d not

trans&ress an/ of its roisions. Were, terefore, a ca!!en&e is ade efore te (o+rt on te

&ro+nd tat no aendent ad in fact een ade or on te &ro+nd tat it as not a a!id

aendent it i!! e ot te d+t/ of te (o+rt as e!! as e and itin its oer to e;aine

te +estion and to rono+nce +on it. <is is recise!/ at a (o+rt is coetent to do in

re&ard to an/ oter !a, te a!idit/ of ic is i+&ned efore it.

58. Neiter of tese atters aears to ae een considered in an'ari PrasadGs case ?H1952I

.(.". 89@ and = tin' tat te/ do erit consideration.

59. */ ord te (ief )+stice as osered tat to+&t in A - $oa!an . <e tate of

*adras ?H1950I .(.". 88@ Patan%a!i astri )., ?as er ten as@ as said tat f+ndaenta!

ri&ts are tose ri&ts ic te eo!e ae resered for tese!es tat !earned )+d&e as

eatica!!/ stated in =n re <e De!i as Act, 1912 ?H1951I .(.". C4C@ tat Par!iaent,

actin& itin te !iits of its !e&is!atie oer, as !enar/ oers of !e&is!ation ic are as

!ar&e and ic are of te sae nat+re as tose of te #ritis Par!iaent and re%ected te

s+&&estion tat Par!iaent is te de!e&ate of te eo!e in o te soerei&nt/ rests. #+tdoes it fo!!o tat te !earned )+d&e as dearted fro is ear!ier ie F No reference as

ade / i in an'ari PrasadGs case ?H1952I .(.". 89@ to is oserations to+& te/

needed to e e;!ained. =n te De!i as Act case e as +ndo+ted!/ said tat Par!iaent

en%o/s !enar/ oers of !e&is!ation. <at Par!iaent as !enar/ oers of !e&is!ation

itin te circ+scried !iits of its !e&is!atie oer and cannot e re&arded as a de!e&ate

of te eo!e i!e e;ercisin& its !e&is!atie oers is a e!! acceted osition. <e fact,

oeer, reains tat +n!i'e te #ritis Par!iaent o+r Par!iaent, !i'e eer/ oter or&an of

te tate, can f+nction on!/ itin te !iits of te oers ic te (onstit+tion as

conferred +on it. <is o+!d a!so e so en, in te e;ercise of its !e&is!atie oer, it

a'es an aendent to te (onstit+tion or to an/ of its roisions. =t o+!d, terefore,

aear tat te ear!ier oseration of Patan%a!i astri )., cannot e re&arded as inconsistentit at e as said =n te De!i as Act case. At an/ rate, tis is an asect of te atter

Page 21: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 21/23

ic re+ires f+rter consideration, artic+!ar!/ eca+se te sae !earned )+d&e as not

aderted to tose oserations in an'ari PrasadGs case. =t is tr+e tat / irt+e of s. 8 of te

=ndian =ndeendence Act, 194C it as +on te (onstit+ent Asse!/ ic fraed te

(onstit+tion and not +on te eo!e of =ndia tat soerei&nt/ deo!ed after te

itdraa! of te #ritis oer. #+t ot te O%ecties "eso!+tion adoted / te

(onstit+ent Asse!/ on )an+ar/ 22, 194C and te Prea!e to te (onstit+tion so tattis soerei&n od/ fraed te (onstit+tion in te nae of te eo!e of =ndia and / irt+e

of te oers deried fro te. =n te circ+stances it o+!d ae to e considered

eter Patan%a!i astri )., as not ri&t in sa/in& tat te f+ndaenta! ri&ts are te

ini+ ri&ts resered / te eo!e to tese!es and te/ are, terefore, +na!tera!e.

60. =t is tr+e tat te (onstit+tion does not direct!/ roiit te aendent of Part ===. #+t it

o+!d indeed e stran&e tat ri&ts ic are considered to e f+ndaenta! and ic

inc!+de one ic is &+aranteed / te (onstit+tion ?ide Art. 32@ so+!d e ore easi!/

caa!e of ein& arid&ed or restricted tan an/ of te atters referred to in te roiso to

Art. 368 soe of ic are eras !ess ita! tan f+ndaenta! ri&ts. =t is ossi!e, as

s+&&ested / / !earned roter, tat Art. 368 ere!/ !a/s don te roced+re to efo!!oed for aendin& te (onstit+tion and does not confer a oer to aend te

(onstit+tion ic, = tin', as to e ascertained fro te roision so+&t to e aended or

oter re!eant roisions or te rea!e. <e ar&+ent tat if f+ndaenta! ri&ts are

re&arded as +ncan&ea!e it i!! aer !e&is!ation ic te can&in& needs of a d/naic

societ/ a/ ca!! for in f+t+re is ei&t/ eno+& and erits consideration. =t is ossi!e tat

tere a/ e an anser. <e ri&ts en+erated in Art. 19?1@ can e s+%ected to reasona!e

restrictions +nder c!s. ?2@ to ?6@ of Art. 19 and te oter f+ndaenta! ri&ts or at !east an/

of te can eras e adated to eet te needs of a can&in& societ/ it te aid of te

directie rinci!es. or, Art. 3C, te second Artic!e in Part =7 ic dea!s it GDirectie

Princi!es of tates Po!ic/G, ioses a d+t/ on te tate to a!/ tose directie rinci!es in

a'in& !as. <ese rinci!es are a!so f+ndaenta! in te &oernance of te co+ntr/ and te

 roisions of Part === of te (onstit+tion +st e interreted aronio+s!/ it tose

 rinci!es. <is is a!so an asect of te atter ic re+ires consideration.

61. We a/ a!so ae to ear in ind te fact tat o+r in a ritten (onstit+tion. <e

(onstit+ent Asse!/ ic as te reositor/ of soerei&nt/ co+!d e!! ae created a

soerei&n Par!iaent on te #ritis ode!. #+t instead it enacted a ritten (onstit+tion,

created tree or&ans of tate, ade te +nion e;ec+tie resonsi!e to Par!iaent and te

tate e;ec+ties to te tate !e&is!at+resB erected a federa! str+ct+re and distri+ted !e&is!atie

 oer eteen Par!iaent and te tate !e&is!at+resB reco&nised certain ri&ts as f+ndaenta!

and roided for teir enforceentB rescried fors of oats of office or affirations icre+ire tose o s+scrie to te to oe tr+e a!!e&iance to te (onstit+tion and f+rter

re+ire te eers of te >nion )+diciar/ and of te i&er %+diciar/ in te tates, to

+o!d te (onstit+tion. Aoe a!!, it for+!ated a so!en and di&nified rea!e ic

aears to e an eitoe of te asic feat+res of te (onstit+tion. (an it not e said tat tese

are indicia of te intention of te (onstit+ent Asse!/ to &ie a eranenc/ to te asic

feat+res of te (onstit+tion F

62. =t is a!so a atter for consideration eter a'in& a can&e in a asis feat+re of te

(onstit+tion can e re&arded ere!/ as an aendent or o+!d it e, in effect, reritin& a

 art of te (onstit+tion and if te !atter, o+!d it e itin te +rie of Art. 368 F

Page 22: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 22/23

63. <e (onstit+tion as en%oined on eer/ eer of Par!iaent efore enterin& +on is

office to ta'e an oat or a'e an affiration to te effect tat e i!! ear tr+e fait and

a!!e&iance to te (onstit+tion. On te oter and +nder Art. 368 a roced+re is rescried for

aendin& te (onstit+tion. =f +on a !itera! interretation of tis roision an aendent

een of te asic feat+res of te (onstit+tion o+!d e ossi!e it i!! e a +estion for

consideration as to o aronise te d+t/ of a!!e&iance to te (onstit+tion it te oerto a'e an aendent to it. (o+!d te to e aronised / e;c!+din& fro te roced+re

for aendent, a!teration of a asic feat+re of te (onstit+tion F =t o+!d e of interest to

ention tat te +ree (o+rt of Pa'istan as, in *r. aK!+! +ader (odr/ . *r.

*od Ad+! a+e ?1963 P..D. 486@ e!d tat francise and for of &oernent are

f+ndaenta! feat+res of a (onstit+tion and te oer conferred +on te President / te

(onstit+tion of Pa'istan to reoe diffic+!ties does not e;tend to a'in& an a!teration in a

f+ndaenta! feat+re of te (onstit+tion. or stri'in& don te action of te President +nder,

at e ca!!s Gs+constit+tiona! oerG (orne!i+s (.)., re!ied on te )+d&esG oat of office.

After +otin& te fo!!oin& assa&e fro (oo!e/Gs (onstit+tiona! iitations :

or te constit+tion of te state is i&er in a+torit/ tan an/ !a, direction, or order ade / an/od/ or an/ officer ass+in& to act +nder it, since s+c od/ or officer +st e;ercise a

de!e&ated a+torit/, and one tat +st necessari!/ e s+serient to te instr+ent / ic

te de!e&ation is ade. =n an/ case of conf!ict te f+ndaenta! !a +st &oern, and te act

in conf!ict it it +st e treated as of no !e&a! a!idit/. <e !earned (ief )+stice

osered :

<o decide +on te +estion of constit+tiona! a!idit/ in re!ation to an act of a stat+tor/

a+torit/, oi&soeer, is a d+t/ deo!in& ordinari!/ +on te s+erior (o+rts / irt+e

of teir office, and in te asence of an/ ar eiter e;ress or i!ied ic stands in te

a/ of tat d+t/ ein& erfored in resect of te Order ere in +estion it is a resonsii!it/

ic cannot e aoided. ?. 506@

64. <e oserations and te assa&e fro (oo!e/, +oted ere for conenience s+ort at

= ae said ear!ier re&ardin& te oer of te (o+rts to rono+nce +on te a!idit/ of

aendents to te (onstit+tion.

65. <e (onstit+tion indicates tree odes of aendents and ass+in& tat te roisions

of Art. 368 confer oer on Par!iaent to aend te constit+tion, it i!! sti!! ae to e

considered eter as !on& as te rea!e stands +naended, tat oer can e e;ercised

it resect to an/ of te asic feat+res of te (onstit+tion.

66. <o i!!+strate a/ oint, as !on& as te ords Gsoerei&n deocratic re+!icG are tere,

co+!d te (onstit+tion e aended so as to deart fro te deocratic for of $oernent

or its re+!ic caracter F =f tat cannot e done, ten, as !on& as te ords )+stice, socia!

econoic and o!itica! etc., are tere co+!d an/ of te ri&ts en+erated in Arts. 14, to 19,

21, 25, 31 and 32 e ta'en aa/ F =f te/ cannot, it i!! e for consideration eter te/ can

 e odified.

6C. =t as een said, no do+t, tat te rea!e is not a art of o+r (onstit+tion. #+t, = tin',

tat if +on a coarison of te rea!e it te road feat+res of te (onstit+tion it o+!d

aear tat te rea!e is an eitoe of tose feat+res or, to +t it different!/ if tese

feat+res are an a!ification or concretisation of te concets set o+t in te rea!e it a/ae to considered eter te rea!e is not a art of te (onstit+tion. Wi!e considerin&

Page 23: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

8/12/2019 Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sajjan-singh-v-state-of-rajasthan 23/23

tis +estion it o+!d e of re!eance to ear in ind tat te rea!e is not of te coon

r+n s+c as is to e fo+nd in an Act of a !e&is!at+re. =t as sta of dee de!ieration and is

ar'ed / recision. Wo+!d tis not s+&&est tat te fraers of te (onstit+tion attaced

secia! si&nificance to it F

68. =n ie of tese considerations and tose entioned / / !earned roter ida/at+!!a). = fee! re!+ctant to e;ress a definite oinion on te +estion eter te ord G!aG in Art.

13 ?2@ of te (onstit+tion e;c!+des an Act of Par!iaent aendin& te (onstit+tion and a!so

eter it is coetent to Par!iaent to a'e an/ aendent at a!! to Part === of te

(onstit+tion.

69. =n so far as te second contention is concerned = &enera!!/ a&ree it at / ord te

(ief )+stice as said +t o+!d on!/ !i'e to add tis : >on te ass+tion tat Par!iaent

can aend Part === of te (onstit+tion and as, terefor, coetent to enact terein Artic!es

31A and 31# as a!so to aend te definition of GestateG, te +estion sti!! reains eter it

co+!d a!idate a tate !a dea!in& it !and. = ta'e it tat on!/ tat !e&is!at+re as oer to

a!idate a !a ic as te oer to enact tat !a. ince te a&rarian !as inc!+ded in te Nint ced+!e and so+&t to e rotected / Art. 31# co+!d not ae een enacted /

Par!iaent, o+!d it e ri&t to sa/ tat Par!iaent co+!d a!idate te F =f Par!iaent co+!d

aend Part === it co+!d, indeed, reoe te iedient in te a/ of te tate e&is!at+res

 / enactin& Art. 31A and aendin& te definition of GestateG. #+t co+!d it &o to te e;tent it

ent en it enacted te irst Aendent Act and te Nint ced+!e and as no added

44 ore a&rarian !as to it F Or as it incoetent to it to &o e/ond enactin& Art. 31A in

1950 and no e/ond aendin& te definition of estate F <is, oeer, does not aear to

ae een considered in an'ari PrasadGs case ?H1952I .(.". 89@ nor as s+c an ar&+ent

adanced efore +s in tis case. = a on!/ entionin& tis to a'e it c!ear tat een in so far

as te second contention is concerned = ase / decision on te narro &ro+nd tat +on te

ar&+ents adanced efore +s no case as een ade o+t for stri'in& don te eenteent

Aendent.

C0. As indicated in te %+d&ent of / ord te (ief )+stice an aendent ade / resort

to te first art of Art. 368 co+!d e str+c' don +on a &ro+nd s+c as ta'in& aa/ te

 %+risdiction of te i& (o+rts +nder Art. 226 or of tis (o+rt +nder Art. 136 ito+t

co!/in& it te re+ireents of te roiso. <o tis = o+!d !i'e to add tat if te effect

of an aendent is to c+rtai! s+stantia!!/, to+& indirect!/, te %+risdiction of i& (o+rts

+nder Art. 226 or of tis (o+rt +nder Art. 136 and reco+rse as not een ad to te roiso to

Art. 368 te +estion eter te aendent as a co!o+ra!e e;ercise of oer /

Par!iaent i!! e re!eant for consideration.

C1. #efore = art it tis case = is to a'e it c!ear tat at = ae said in tis %+d&ent

is not an e;ression of / fina! oinion +t on!/ an e;ression of certain do+ts ic ae

assai!ed e re&ardin& a +estion of arao+nt iortance to te citiKens of o+r co+ntr/ : to

'no eter te asic feat+res of te (onstit+tion +nder ic e !ie and to ic e

oe a!!e&iance are to end+re for a!! tie or at !east for te forseea!e f+t+re or eter

te/ are no ore end+rin& tan te i!eenta! and s+ordinate roisions of te

(onstit+tion.

C2. Petitions disissed.