Safety Share Line Superintendent Report to IAEC

Safety ShareLine Superintendent Report to IAEC

The crew was doing a routine pole change out. They were “lifting” a pole

(some of us may define it as pulling a pole).

The boom was nearly extended all the way out, therefore causing even more leverage on the boom. No overload protection devices operated prior to the boom failure.

My best guess as to the cause of the accident was boom fatigue over time from “pulling” poles and not “lifting” poles. I also speculate that the boom failed prior to the overload protection devices sensing the

overload.

This is one of those events that no one is going to say anymore than they have to and management cannot prove otherwise. There was no push-back as it was made clear that all pole removals require the use of a pole puller.It is difficult to say if our pulling/lifting actions were the cause or if there was indeed a premature mechanical failure of the boom. The possibility of the men or the truck manufacture coming forward to admit any fault is slim to none.

From today on at “XYZ CO-OP”, if another bent boom comes in, it will not be because of pulling poles and a very good, proven explanation will have to be provided as to why the boom is bent.

DUECO was the manufacture. Equipment is not designed to perform this task. Twin-screw digger derrick. Estimates are around $50,000.

WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO REMOVE POLES FROM THE EARTH?

Does your Co-op have an extra $50,000 laying around?

• Should there be disciplinary action?• Is there a need for a policy change?