IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency name of presenter (e-mail) training event title dates location, host organization, host country Safe management of Low and Intermediate Level Waste (LILW) prior to Disposal
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
name of presenter (e-mail)
training event title
dates
location, host organization, host country
Safe management of Low and Intermediate
Level Waste (LILW) prior to Disposal
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=39861&id=1732371649
IAEA
Contents – Part 1
• Introduction and review
• Sources of LILW
• Review of Options
• Segregation, minimisation and characterization
• Development of waste form and associated safety considerations
2
IAEA
Key references
3
2009 2003 2005 2008
IAEA
Introduction
• Importance of safe management of radioactive waste has long been
recognized;
• Fundamentals and higher-level requirements for predisposal waste
management;
• This module addresses specific guidance for predisposal management of LILW.
4
IAEA
Predisposal Management (Review)
• Predisposal includes all steps from waste
generation to final
acceptance for
disposal or removal
from regulatory
control;
• Class review: provide examples of the steps
in the waste
management lifecycle.
5
IAEA
Facility Design
• Measures are needed to avoid or reduce, to the extent practicable, generation of
radioactive waste requiring long-term
controls
• Segregation and release;
• Reuse or recycle;
• Manage in accordance with national strategy.
6
IAEA
LILW Sources
• Nuclear Fuel Cycle Operations
• Research and Development Facilities
• Decommissioning of Facilities and Remediation
• Sealed Sources
• NORM
• Small Users
7
IAEA
Types of LILW
• Short-lived and long-lived;
• Solid, liquid, or gas;
• Surface contaminated or activated materials;
• Concentrated with higher activity or large volumes at lower activities.
8
IAEA
Gaseous Waste
• Effluents from ventilation systems;
• Off-gas from systems for primary coolant
degasification in
reactors;
• Off-gas from processing systems (e.g., spent
fuel);
• Off-gas from storage tanks.
9
IAEA
Liquids
• Laundry and shower water;
• Drainage from floors and equipment;
• Organic liquids;
• Decontamination liquids (may include complexing
agents);
• Chemical process residues;
• Produced water from oil wells.
10
IAEA
Slurries
• Spent ion exchange resins;
• Filter aids;
• Sludges;
• Precipitation flocculants;
• Evaporator concentrates;
• Scale removed from oil wells;
• Petroleum or other tank bottoms.
11
IAEA
Solid Waste
• General contaminated trash, incinerator residues;
• Metallic components and tools;
• Fuel cladding and assemblies;
• Protective equipment; • Filter boxes; • Debris; • Activated components; • Radiation sources; • NORM.
12
IAEA
Generators (Nuclear Fuel Supply)
• Refining and conversion of U and Th;
• Enrichment;
• Fabrication;
• Examples of wastes include: contaminated solids, process sludges, aqueous and organic liquids (long-lived alpha emitters).
13
IAEA
Generators (Nuclear Power Plant)
• Primarily short-lived contaminated and activated materials, but some long-lived
fission and activation products;
• Solid, liquid and gaseous waste;
• Class discussion – examples of different wastes from nuclear power plants.
14
IAEA
Reactor Operations
15
IAEA
Activity Levels in LILW from Reactors
16
IAEA
Examples of “Mixed” LILW
Chemotoxic Waste Stream Radionuclides present
Used liquid scintillation fluids H-3, C-14
Waste oil H-3, C-14, Mn-54, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, Cs-137
Chlorinated organics H-3, C-14, P-32, S-35, I-125
Lead wastes P-32, Co-60, I-125, Cs-137
Mercury wastes H-3, C-14, I-125
Chromium wastes Cr-51, Co-60
Cadmium wastes Co-60, Cs-134, Cs-137
Aqueous corrosive liquids H-3, C-14, Co-60, Cs-137
17
IAEA
Generators
(Decommissioning and Restoration)
• Typically large volume, less contaminated wastes (debris, soils, etc.);
• Some reactor components can involve higher activity levels and long-lived radionuclides;
• Liquid wastes may also be generated from cleaning and decontamination operations.
18
IAEA
Spent-Fuel Management
• Spent fuel may be managed intact or processed;
• Reprocessing is a source of short- and long-lived solid,
liquid, and gaseous waste,
for example:
Fuel cladding and fuel
assembly components;
Sludges and concentrates
from effluent treatment;
Gaseous waste during fuel
dissolution.
19
IAEA
Generators (Research and Pilot Plants)
• Wide variety of process specific wastes, no
general description:
Research Reactors;
Hot Cells;
Pilot fuel processing;
Maintenance facilities;
Post-irradiation
examination facilities;
R&D and laboratory
facilities.
20
IAEA
LILW in Many Countries
• Mining and Mineral Processing;
• Spent Sources;
• NORM
• Oil and Gas;
• Industry;
• Hospitals.
21
IAEA
NORM Facilities
• Oil and Gas;
• Phosphogypsum;
• Geothermal;
• Drinking water treatment;
• Mining and mineral processing.
22
IAEA
Oil and Gas NORM
Ethane (Rn + d)
Propane (Rn + d)
Butane
Plant Fuel
To StorageChiller
Gas Plant
Ab
so
rbe
r
Tre
ate
r
Residual or
Sales Gas (Rn + D)
Flare
Rn + d
Gas Plants
Flare
Rn + d
LNG
Rn + d
Sales
Gas Compressor
Stations
Well
Head
Gas
Rn + d
Rn + d GasGas Rn + d
Stock
TanksPipe Line
Many Days
He
ate
r
Tre
ate
r
Se
pa
rato
r CrudeH O2 Crude
U + ThU + Ra
+ Th
Ra + d
Th + d
Water
Treatment
Plant
Injection
or Discharge
Ra +d, Th + d
Well
Head
U + Ra +
Rn + d +
Th + d
Crude
Gas
H O2
23
IAEA
Radioactivity in NORM
These data should only be used as rough indicators of the levels of radioactivity.
Material Radionuclide Concentrations (Bq/kg)
Scale in pipes and equipment for oil/gas production 0 - 15,000,000 (average one thousand to
hundreds of thousand)
Sludges in natural gas supply equipment up to ~40,000
Sludges from ponds of produced water 10,000 to greater than 40,000
Scales from geothermal energy production 4,000 - 40,000
Uranium mining overburden 100 - 20,000 (only Radium reported) (average
~5,000 total radionuclide concentration)
Coal fired power plants 100 - 25,000
Drinking water treatment waste Sludges - ~600 (only Ra reported)
Resins - ~1,300,000 (only Ra reported)
Phosphate fertilizer 1,000 - 25,000
Phosphate processing waste Phosphogypsum - 1,000 - 4,000
Slag - 2,000 - 7,000
Scale - ~40,000 (only Ra reported)
Other mineral processing waste up to 40,000 (generally 100 - 5,000)
226
226
226
24
IAEA
Processing Options (Review)
• Pretreatment;
• Treatment;
• Conditioning;
• Container or Packaging;
• Storage.
25
IAEA
Waste Disposal Options
Surface Disposal
Surface Discharge Geological Disposal
Well injection
Near-Surface Disposal
26
IAEA
Waste Acceptance Criteria
• Predisposal management is intended to produce waste that can be handled, transported, stored and disposed safely;
• Acceptance requirements for each step considered early and met;
• Conditioning requirements for disposal generally the primary consideration;
• Quality assurance programs are critical.
27
IAEA
Other Hazards
• Toxic metals;
• Explosive or fire risks;
• Biotoxins;
• Organics.
28
IAEA
Control of Waste Generation
• The best waste management approach is to limit the generation of the waste at the source (waste minimization);
• Minimization applies to the volume and activity of waste;
• Primary waste generation as well as secondary wastes from predisposal activities;
• Discussion: waste minimization approaches.
29
IAEA
Waste Minimization Strategies
• Segregation and use of controlled areas;
• Proper planning and selection of equipment;
• Decontamination, when possible, and awareness of secondary waste from
decontamination;
• Recycle and reuse.
30
IAEA
Effectiveness of Minimization
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Cu
bic
Mete
rs D
isp
osed
per
Reacto
r U
nit
Volume of LILW Radioactive Waste Disposed
(Median Values for PWR)
Volume of LILW Radioactive Waste Disposed
(Median Values for BWR)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
198
0
198
2
198
4
198
6
198
8
199
0
199
2
199
4
199
6
199
7Cu
bic
Mete
rs D
ispo
sed
per
Re
ac
tor U
nit
USA
France
31
IAEA
Reduction at Source
• Design (materials, processes, structures) considering waste minimization;
• Design considering decommissioning needs;
• Techniques and equipment that do not result in excess waste generation;
• Effective containment and packaging of radioactive materials;
• Zoning to limit areas of contamination.
32
IAEA
Discharge, Recycle/Reuse Example
Uranium extraction from ore
33
IAEA
Considerations for Choice of
Preferred Options
• Waste characteristics;
• Acceptance criteria at receiving facilities;
• Availability of facilities;
• Availability of processing;
• Regulations for use, discharge, and removal from control.
34
IAEA
Planning and Design for Decommissioning
• Account for radionuclides in residual waste, technical
implementability, cost,
schedule, and institutional
factors;
• Initial and final decommissioning plans;
• Specification of critical tasks;
• Identification of management functions;
• Commensurate with level of hazards.
35
IAEA
Development of LILW Waste Form
36
IAEA
LILW form development
• Waste form that meets acceptance criteria at all stages including disposal;
• Ideally maximize the amount of waste that is suitable for discharge, use, or
removal from regulatory control;
• Licence requirements strictly observed and changes should be reported to the
regulatory body.
37
IAEA
Waste Characterization
• Characterization may occur multiple times during pretreatment for information on properties, to confirm for acceptance, process verification, etc.;
• Requirements will depend on waste type;
• Sampling and analysis, process knowledge, and/or nondestructive or destructive testing.
38
IAEA
Waste Form Specifications
• Specifications are necessary to ensure that the final waste form satisfies
acceptance criteria;
• Radiological characteristics are determined early in the process;
• Other characteristics that can be quantified into specifications are
introduced on the following slides.
39
IAEA
Chemical and Physical Properties
(Waste Form)
• Chemical composition;
• Physical properties (density, permeability, etc.);
• Homogeneity, waste compatibility;
• Thermal stability;
• Moisture percentage;
• Leachability and corrosion rates (used for source term release modeling).
40
IAEA
Mechanical Properties
• Tensile and compressive strength;
• Dimensional stability;
• Behavior under expected mechanical or thermal loads;
• Expected changes in properties for time frame over which mechanical
stability is needed.
41
IAEA
Chemical and Physical Properties
(Container)
• Container materials;
• Physical properties (permeability, etc.);
• Thermal conductivity;
• Degradation rate in disposal environment;
• Corrosion rate in disposal environment.
42
IAEA
Physical Properties of Waste Package
• Acceptable void percentage in container;
• Effectiveness of seals for gas and moisture;
• Presence of any vents, if gas generation is expected;
• Sensitivity to changes in temperature.
43
IAEA
Containment Capability
• Long-term performance as a barrier to radionuclide
releases;
• Diffusion and leach rates in disposal environment;
• Gas release rates, including tritium;
• Fixation and retention of radionuclides;
• Seal capability (moisture, gas).
44
IAEA
Waste Package Stability
• Temperature cycling;
• Elevated temperatures (e.g., fire);
• Radiation damage;
• Moisture resistance;
• Corrosion resistance (including micro-organisms);
• Gas tightness and potential for pressurization.
45
IAEA
Contents – Part 2
• Pretreatment
• Treatment
• Conditioning
• Storage
• Record Keeping
46
IAEA
Pretreatment
• Includes collection, segregation, chemical adjustment, and
decontamination;
• First priority to reduce amount of waste;
• Second priority to adjust characteristics to make amenable for further processing
or reduce hazards.
47
IAEA
Pretreatment – Collection/Segregation
• First step is to collect and segregate waste,
characterization is critical at
this point;
• Waste that can be discharged or for which
regulatory controls can be
removed (clearance, recycle,
store for decay, etc.);
• Low activity, short-lived and long-lived LILW segregated.
48
IAEA
Characterization During Pretreatment
• Proper characterization is essential to ensure proper
segregation and
management of waste (basis
for initial documentation);
• Radiological, chemical, physical, and pathogenic
properties;
• Potential hazards should be identified (incompatibilities,
gas generation, etc.).
49
IAEA
Pretreatment – Segregation for Treatment
• Segregation should also be based on the overall waste management strategy and
available facilities, for example:
Combustible or non-combustible
(incineration);
Compressible or non-compressible
(compaction);
Metallic or non-metallic (melting or sizing);
Fixed or non-fixed surface contamination
(decontamination).
50
IAEA
Liquid Waste Segregation
It should be based on their properties: Activity and radionuclide content
Short-lived radionuclides suitable for decay storage
Long-lived liquid waste requiring conditioning, subsequent storage and final disposal
Organic liquids
Aqueous liquids
Non-homogeneous waste (sludge)
Infectious liquids
Chemically hazardous liquids
51
IAEA
Segregation of Solid Waste
Activity and radionuclide content suitable for decay
Pathogenic
Toxic (heavy metals, cyanide, etc.)
Dangerous (explosive, pyrophoric, etc.)
Sharp (broken glass, hypodermic needles, etc.)
Damp solids
Presence of absorbed liquid waste (flash points >60oC)
Combustible/non-combustible
Compactable/non-compactable
52
IAEA
Segregation of Solid Waste
(for sending to centralized facility)
Solid waste sent to a centralized facility for compaction should not contain the following kind of waste: Sealed sources
Absorbed liquids (unless in an approved form);
Flasks containing free liquids
Heavy objects;
Wood (in some cases);
Uncontained (loose) sharp;
Toxic, pathogenic and dangerous materials;
Powders;
Aerosol or pressurised containers.
53
IAEA
Segregation of Solid Waste (Container)
• Storage containers should be appropriately labelled with a radiation trefoil and a unique identification code.
• The following information on the waste should be retained:
Identification number
Radionuclides
Activity (if measured or estimated)/date
Origin (room, laboratory, installation, etc. if applicable)
Potential/actual hazards (chemical, infectious, etc.)
Surface dose rate/date of measurement
Quantity (weight or volume)
54
IAEA
Pretreatment – Decontamination
• Decontamination removes surface contamination via mechanical, chemical and electrochemical methods;
• LILW may be suitable for release from regulatory control;
• Generation of secondary waste and the characteristics of secondary waste.
55
IAEA
Pretreatment – Mixing
• Mixing of waste must be limited to compatible waste forms, unless
hazards are mitigated (chemical
reactions, volatilization, etc.);
• Organic liquids should be segregated due to chemical nature
and specific hazards.
56
IAEA
Removal from Regulatory Control (1)
• Authorized discharge, disposal, recycle, reuse, and direct removal from regulatory control;
• Decontamination or store for decay;
• Specific exemption criteria identified in GSR Part 3;
• Formal process established to demonstrate regulatory compliance (radiological and non-radiological).
57
IAEA
Removal from Regulatory Control (2)
• Authorized atmospheric and liquid discharges part of an optimized waste
management programme;
• Buildings and sites may also be removed from regulatory control after all waste is
properly managed and decontamination.
58
IAEA
Treatment of LILW
• Volume Reduction (e.g., incineration, compaction, or sizing);
• Removal of Radionuclides (e.g., evaporation, ion exchange, filtration);
• Change of Form (e.g., precipitation, digestion, oxidation);
• Change of Properties (e.g., melting).
59
IAEA
Treatment – Combustion (1)
• Greatest volume reduction for combustible waste (liquid or
solid, effective for organics);
• Radionuclides in ash, exhaust gas cleaning residues, and
discharges;
• Corrosive combustion products should be identified and
limited;
• Accumulation of radionuclides in gas cleaning residues and
ash;
60
IAEA
Treatment – Combustion (2)
• Stack emissions are a consequence of combustion;
• Monitoring of stack emissions provides evidence that authorized limits are not exceeded;
• Off-gas scrubbing may be implemented to control emissions;
• Non-radiological emissions must also be considered (e.g., acids, PCBs, etc.).
61
IAEA
Treatment – Compaction (1)
• Many LILW streams are amenable to compaction
(e.g., general trash,
protective clothing, etc.);
• Acceptance criteria for the compaction facility should be
well defined;
• Desired volume reduction for different types of waste
should be defined;
62
IAEA
Treatment – Compaction (2)
• Potential consequences must be considered when
designing and operating a
compactor:
Airborne and liquid
releases;
Chemical reactivity during
and after compaction;
Fire or explosion resulting
from pyrophoric or
explosive materials or
pressurized components.
63
IAEA
Treatment - Sizing
• Large bulky items may be segmented, disassembled, or sized by other means;
• High temperature flames, sawing methods, hydraulic shearing, abrasive cutting, and plasma arc cutting are possible methods;
• Particulate contamination should be a major consideration when selecting an approach and during operations.
64
IAEA
Treatment – Radionuclide Removal (1)
• Aqueous and gaseous wastes are often amenable to treatment approaches that remove radionuclides and organics, for example: Evaporation;
Ion Exchange;
Filtration, Ultrafiltration;
Centrifugation.
65
IAEA
Treatment – Radionuclide Removal (2)
• Concentrating a gaseous or liquid waste stream can lead to the potential for criticality
or creating a concentrated waste stream that
does not meet acceptance criteria;
• Process designed such that any liquids remaining after radionuclide removal are
suitable for discharge or treatment.
66
IAEA
Radionuclide Removal – Ion Exchange
• Ion exchange is a proven method commonly implemented to remove
radionuclides from a liquid waste stream;
• Spent resins managed as a liquid slurry or as a solid waste;
• Gas generation and other potential radiolytic or chemical reactions need to
considered, if prolonged storage.
67
IAEA
Radionuclide Removal – Filtration (1)
• Filtration is also an often used and proven method for radionuclide removal;
• Particulates and aerosols in gases may be removed using HEPA filters;
• Iodine and noble gases can be removed by filters or sorption beds with activated charcoal;
• Filters are also effective for some liquid waste streams;
68
IAEA
Radionuclide Removal – Filtration (2)
• Regulatory body may require redundant filters;
• Pre-filters or roughing filters, temperature and humidity controls, and monitoring equipment;
• Used filters and sorption beds are managed as solid waste ;
• Concentrations of radionuclides should not be allowed to exceed levels accepted for future
conditioning, storage or disposal.
69
IAEA
Filtration Example
(membrane reverse osmosis)
• Nine Mile Point (BWR) operates under “zero liquid” discharge approach;
• Process water: reactor shroud swarf, sanitary water, lake water, and oily wastewater;
• Reduced secondary waste generation by 89% compared to demineralizer;
• High water purity, low organic content;
• Solid wastes in concentrate consistently Class A LLW (US NRC) after dehydration
70
IAEA
Treatment – Change of Form (1)
• Aqueous wastes are also amenable to treatment approaches that change the
form of the waste or radionuclides, for
example:
Chemical Precipitation;
Digestion;
Oxidation.
71
IAEA
Treatment – Change of Form (2)
• When changing the form of a waste or radionuclides in a waste, process limitations need to be
considered, for example:
Corrosion;
Scaling or Foaming;
Fire or explosion risk in presence of organics;
• Safety issues (criticality, highly concentrated radionuclides in secondary waste) associated with
remove radionuclides are also relevant in this case.
72
IAEA
Treatment – Change of Properties
• Non-compressible and non-combustible solid waste may be treated by change of properties;
• Melting LILW metal waste is one example;
• Melting can homogenize radionuclides in a slag, which may lead to beneficial averaging of concentrations.
73
IAEA
Conditioning
• Operations that produce a waste form and package suitable for:
Safe handling;
Transport;
Storage; and
Disposal;
• Immobilization of liquid or dispersable waste, container, and/or overpack, as necessary.
74
IAEA
Conditioning – Waste Form (1)
• Liquid or slurried LILW often converted to solid form (e.g., cement) that should have following characteristics, as necessary:
Compatibility waste form and container;
Homogeneity;
Low void space;
Low permeability and leachability;
Stability for time period required;
Resistance to chemical and biological attack;
75
IAEA
Conditioning – Waste Form (2)
• Certain metals may react with alkaline water in a cement slurry
to produce hydrogen;
• Chelating agents and their potential impact on the
solidification process;
• Solid waste generally exhibits same characteristics listed on
previous slide, but homogeneity
and void space may not apply .
76
IAEA
Conditioning – Waste Packages (1)
• End goal is that the package resulting from conditioning should meet respective
acceptance criteria, as applicable;
• Regulatory body and operators for transport, storage and disposal should be
consulted to confirm criteria can be met;
77
IAEA
Conditioning – Waste Packages (2)
• Waste and container should be compatible for time frame
required;
• Container may need to provide shielding depending
on waste form and methods
selected for handling,
transport, and storage;
• Potential need for decontamination of container
should be considered;
78
IAEA
Conditioning – Waste Packages (3)
• Container should be designed to maintain integrity for all steps in
process;
• Long-term integrity must allow for
• Retrieval at end of storage;
• Enclosure in overpack, if necessary;
• Transport and handling at disposal facility;
• Long-term performance after disposal.
79
IAEA
Examples of Waste Packages
80
IAEA
Container Labeling
• Unique container identifier;
• Radiation levels;
• Handling requirements;
• Weight;
• Description of contents;
• Special hazards.
81
IAEA
LILW Storage Considerations
• Short-lived LILW is often collected and stored for a time sufficient to meet
regulatory requirements for release, use,
or discharge;
• Strict acceptance criteria and container integrity requirements for waste
potentially stored for long periods of time
awaiting a disposal facility.
82
IAEA
LILW Predisposal Records (1)
• Records relate to the facility, the waste and compliance
with acceptance criteria,
including:
data for national inventory of
waste;
data for waste characterization;
records for control processes
during predisposal;
container procurement records;
83
IAEA
LILW Predisposal Records (2)
• Waste package specifications;
• Audit records for waste packages;
• Operating performance trends;
• Non-compliances with specifications and corrective actions;
• Monitoring, surveillance and inspection records;
• Safety assessment documentation;
• Operating procedures;
• Other data as required by Regulatory Body.
84
IAEA
Waste Characterization Record Keeping
• Characterization records form the basis for many management decisions throughout life cycle for a waste;
• Updated as a result of predisposal activities;
• Serve as key input for decisions regarding compliance with acceptance criteria.
85
IAEA
Waste Characterization Records
The following information should be maintained in a characterization record:
Source or origin;
Physical and chemical form;
Amount;
Radiological characteristics;
Classification;
Non-radioactive hazards;
Special handling requirements.
86
IAEA
Predisposal Reporting Requirements
• Periodic reporting to the Regulatory Body is necessary
to verify compliance with
regulatory authorizations;
• Routine reports address operations during reporting
period and status at end of
period;
• Any incident or accident or variation from the safety basis
should be reported promptly.
87
IAEA
Predisposal Report Summary (1)
A periodic report from a predisposal waste
management facility should generally
contain a summary of:
Waste received, including secondary waste
generated at the facility;
Waste processing;
Waste transfers;
Effluent discharges;
88
IAEA
Predisposal Report Summary (2)
• Material removed from regulatory control;
• Inventories and net changes waste received, processed, stored, transferred;
trends in safety performance;
• Estimate of radiological impacts;
• Non-compliances.
89
IAEA
Summary
• Main goal is to minimize generation of waste
• Characterization is critical throughout predisposal
• Variety of approaches are available for treatment and conditioning
• Efforts on characterization can be wasted with improper labeling and
recordkeeping
90
IAEA Thank you! 91
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=39861&id=1732371649