SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Regulatory project management VN/RA/01 Task 1&2 Workshop Hanoi, October.

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS • STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALENRADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY

Regulatory project management

VN/RA/01 Task 1&2 Workshop

Hanoi, October 2012

Confidential

Ilari Aro

Ref. to Kirsi Alm-Lytz

STUK

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS • STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALENRADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 2PVM/NN

Outline

• Regulatory oversight projects– Procedures developed at STUK– Typical oversight projects

• Examples of regulatory project management in new build projects– OL3 - STUK’s role and organisation in licensing steps – Summary of STUK’s competences and resources needed for OL3

project oversight

– Preparation for regulatory oversight of upcoming new build projects

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS • STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALENRADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY 3

Regulatory oversight projects

• Regulatory oversight is defined in the legislation and regulations

• New plant projects and plant modifications are initiated by the licensees-> STUK can’t decide whether the regulatory work should be done

or not but choice can be made whether the oversight work is performed as projects or within line organisation


Projects office at STUK/NRR(Department of Nuclear Reactor Regulation)

Projects office (PMO) founded in 2002 for the oversight of the OL3 licensing

Co-ordinates the regulatory oversight in new NPP licensing process, in NPP operating license renewals and in some larger plant modifications

Develops the project management procedures for oversight projects

Supports the project managers in project planning and prepares quarterly collective report on projects’ progress

Provides resident inspectors for new NPPs under construction

Oversight support

Department services

Structures and componentsAssistant director

Martti Vilpas

Projects and operationalsafety

Assistant directorKirsi Alm-Lytz

Reactor and safetysystems

Section headRisto Sairanen

Risk analysisSection head

Jorma Sandberg

Electrical andautomation systems

Section headKim Wahlström

Radiation protectionSection headOlli Vilkamo

Nuclear facilities andsystems

Assistant directorKeijo Valtonen

Nuclear Reactor RegulationDirector Petteri Tiippana

Deputy directorMarja-Leena Järvinen

Mechanical engineeringSection headPetri Vuorio

Civil engineeringSection head

Pekka Välikangas

Manufacturingtechnology

Section headJuhani Hinttala

Operational safetySection headJukka Kupila

ProjectsSection head

Janne Nevalainen

Project managers:OL 3: Tapani Virolainen

VALVE: Janne Nevalainen

LARA: Kaj Söderholm

Nuclear Security


Development of the project management procedures at STUK/NRR

• After foundation of Projects unit in 2002 also other oversight works have been co-ordinated as projects

• The detailed guidance for the regulatory project management was finalised in 2010

• STUK/NRR project model is based on generic project management practices, references e.g.,– A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK

guide), ANSI/PMI 99-001-2008– ABC project model, Finnish Project Institute


STUK/NRR project model

G1 PE

Planningphase

Closing phase

Executionphase

Preparation phase

Project ideaEvaluation

phase

Portfolio management

Project management

Project execution

Initiating

Management and control

Closing

Project planning

MS MS

End product of project

G0

Project documentsProject charter Assessment reportProject meeting memosProject management plan

Progress reports List of follow-up items


Regulatory oversight projectsGuidance for a single project

• Decision of project start, G0 (criteria, project charter template)• Project organisation (steering group, project manager, project group,

resident inspectors)• Project planning (project management plan templates)• Project management and control (meeting practices, communication with

licensee and other stakeholders, resource management, progress reporting and template)

• Closing project (closing meeting, assessment report and follow-up list templates)

• Documentation (record keeping)

Project management in STUK/NRR• Project classification (ABC model, classification principles and procedures

in different classes)• Project portfolio management (excel table used by PMO, quarterly project

progress reports and portfolio reporting)• Engagement in the department’s yearly planning process (resource

planning)


Typical oversight projects

• New build projects• Operating licence renewals and periodic safety reviews• Extensive plant modifications involving

– several technical areas– high safety significance– long time schedules (several years)– large resource need (several person-months of oversight work)


Oversight projects of nuclear facilities• new nuclear facilities

– FIN5 (2002-2014, oversight of OL3 licensing and construction)

– PAP (2008-2009, DiPs for new NPPs)– VALVE (2010-2014, preparations for FIN6/7 CL appl.

review)– ONKALO (2005 ->, construction of research tunnels

and final repository for spent fuel)• operating licence renewals/ periodic safety reviews

– KLUPA (Loviisa licence renewal, ended 2007)– OLMATA (Olkiluoto periodic safety review, ended 2009)– FLUPA (Research reactor licence renewal, ended 2012)

• large plant modifications– LARA (Loviisa I&C renewal, 2004-2016)– LOKIT (Loviisa liquid waste solidification plant

construction, 2002-2013)– KOPLA (enlargement of Olkiluoto interim storage for

spent fuel, 2009-2013)– LAMO (modernisation of Loviisa refueling machine,

2010 ->)– DiGU (modernisation of Olkiluoto diesel generators,

2010 ->)– LoPolar (modernisation of Loviisa Polar crane, 2010 ->)


Project portfolio

Name Description Class Owner Manager Group Schedule Project phase

Estimated project progress (traffic lights)

e.g. FIN5 Olkiluoto 3 ... A N.N. N.N. N.N., …

Project initiated – predicted end

Planning/ Execution/ Closing

-Resources available -Use of resources compared to the planned-deviations in the submitting scheduleof documents for review-deviations in the quality of submitted documents for review

• Excel table collecting information on different projects• Includes also links to the project charter, project management

plan and the latest progress report• Project managers report quarterly on the progress of their

projects• Office head of PMO updates the project portfolio and reports

quarterly in the operative and management meetings on the progress of projects and possible resource problems


Example – Olkiluoto 3, resources for licensing and regulatory oversight


12

OL3 Project generally 1/2

• OL3 is the first EPR being constructed

• OL3 is a turn key project– Owner and operator (Licensee) is

TVO – Constructed by Consortium of Areva

and Siemens• Project is progressing but is more

than five years behind the original schedule

Photos: TVO


OL3 Project generally 2/2

• Main civil construction activities finished at the site

• Current issues– Installation activities

ongoing– Design of instrumentation

and control system (independence, testing, qualification)

• Operating licence application expected during 2013

• Schedule for Commercial operation under elaboration


• STUK started preparations for regulatory oversight of OL3 project in 2002 after DIP – Establishment of a

• project office and project group to plan and coordinate work• project plan for the oversight (steps, goals, resources, risks, reporting)

– Discussions with • the utility on the project schedule, content of documents for construction

licence• Technical Support Organisations to establish analysis capabilities needed for

independent comparison analyses• Regulators with recent licensing and construction experience• Regulators and TSO’s with knowledge on EPR design• Inspection Organisations possibly needed in the project

– Resource planning • to plan the work of subprojects (technical disciplines) • to find out possible expertise gaps.

OL3, CL phase - organization, competences and resources 1/4


• Conclusions of the planning were– STUK mainly had a core competences to review technical issues

presented in PSAR and other documents of CL application• on the other hand, resources to oversee existing plants was too

small - recruiting was necessary.– Technical support of TSOs was needed

• for new features like airplane crashes, severe accidents (melt retention in core catcher), digital I&C and primary system materials and components

• to perform independent assessments and analyses of design to support STUK’s decision making.

– co-operation with French regulatory body (ASN) to share experiences of EPR design.



Electrical systemsAutomation systems

Layout, Auxiliary systemsTurbine systems

Nuclear materials and Waste

Mechanical equipment

Reactor, safety functions, systems and analyses

Radiation safety and emergency preparedness

Probabilistic risk assessment

Civil construction, Structures, Fire protection

Quality Management and organisation

Commissioning and operational safety


STUK´s project group


OL 3 technical support areas in CL phaseDesign basis accidents

Severe accidents

External threats & airplanecrash

Building & construction

Primary system andcomponents mechanicaldesignWater chemistry

Digital I & C

Nuclear fuel

Radiological consequences

PSA

Other



• Review and approval of detailed design documentation for systems, structures and components (SSCs)– Before start of construction or manufacturing

• Oversight of and inspections on manufacturing and construction to verify QA and QC activities of manufacturer, vendor and licensee– Resident inspectors on site (complemented with staff from HQ)– Regular visits at the component manufacturing sites

• Assessment of licensee´s performance to verify the adequacy of project management, safety assessment, QA/QC programmes, etc. – Quality of the submitted regulatory documentation– Inspections within the construction inspection programme– Resident inspectors at site

• Assessment of the performance of the parties responsible for design, construction and manufacturing – participation as an observer in audits, inspection visits, manufacturing

and construction oversight, meetings

OL3, construction - STUK objectives 1/2


– Inspections during construction on structures and components

• To verify QA and QC results and activities of manufacturer, vendor and licensee - product conformity

• Defined in regulatory guides• Inspection organizations used in

lower safety classes

– Inspections on licensee’s performance within the Construction Inspection Program

• To verify the adequacy of project management, safety assessment, QA/QC programmes, etc. - performance conformity

• Inspections during construction can be divided to two categories

OL3, construction - STUK objectives 2/2


• Oversight during construction needs– same core competences than during CL phase but also– much new know-how (e.g. materials, concreting, welding, QA/QC

inspections to manufacturers, site supervision...) and human resources when the amount of work is much larger.

• STUK has continued recruiting as well as using of TSOs and IOs– technical experts recruited from expert organisations, utilities or from

“conventional” industry - background from nuclear side not necessarily needed in all tasks

– IOs are “extension” of STUK - they take STUK’s role as a regulator in lower safety classes.

– TSOs participate more in STUK’s reviews than make independent analyses.

OL3, Construction phase - organisation, competences and resources


Regulatory Oversight (man-years/NPP)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1-3 2012

Reg

ula

tory

ove

rsig

ht

[man

yea

rs]

LO1/LO2 LO3 OL1/OL2 OL3 OL4 FV1


Oversight OL3 - mechanical engineering and manufacturing technology

• Core competences for mechanical engineering, red colour indicates remarkable increase of resources– Nuclear fuel and control rods– Mechanical equipment– Nuclear power plant pressure

vessels– Strength analysis– Manufacturing technology– Material technology and ageing– NDI– Ageing management– Assessment of QMS– Utilization of PRA in inspections– Maintenance– Assessment of inspection

organisations.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - mechanical components and manufacturing technology

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110

5

10

15

20

25

30

Number of staff - mechanical components

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - reactor and safety systems

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

23PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - reactor and safety systems

• Core competences for reactor and safety systems– Safety Principles and Design

Basis of NPP– Deterministic safety analysis– NPP Technology and system

design, thermal hydraulics– Reactor technology and physics,

criticality safety – Nuclear fuel technology– Containment functions– I&C functions– Severe accidents– Technical specifications– Emergency response– Operational safety

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Number of staff - reactor and safety systems

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - radiation protection

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

24PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - radiation protection

• Core competences for radiation protection– Radiation protection - dose

control– Radiation protection - dose

calculations– Radioactive release (normal

operation)– Emergency preparedness and

rescue services at NPP– Dispersion of radioactive

releases in accidents – source term

– Meteorology - dispersion of radioactive releases

– Monitoring environment of NPP – Research reactors– Nuclear waste management.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Number of staff - radiation protection

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - risk analysis

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

25PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - risk analysis

• Core competences for risk analysis

– PRA in risk informed regulation– Fire protection– Meteorological and

environmental risks– Seismic risks– PRA-methods (level 1 and 2)– PRA software (user skills and

development)– Operation, Maintenance– Reliability of human

performance– Theoretical basis of risk

analysis.2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0123456789

10

Number of staff - risk analysis

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - electrical and automation systems

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

26PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - electrical and automation systems

• Core competences for electrical and automation systems– Electrical systems and

components– Embedded automation of

electrical components– Protection automation– Accident instrumentation and

accident management systems– Software based automation

systems– QA & QC, verification and

validation– Operational automation– Control room– Ageing of I&C components.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Number of staff - electrical and automation systems

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - civil engineering

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

27PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - civil engineering

• Core competences for civil engineering

– Civil engineering – Construction technology– Strength analyses– Fire protection– Lay-out– Risk analysis.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Number of staff - civil engineering

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - project office

year

ma

ny

ea

rs

28PVM/NN

Oversight OL3 - project office

• Core competences for project office – Handling of license

applications– Regulatory control of plant

projects– Project management– Management systems / QA &

QA, safety culture issues– Modification projects– Interfaces between technical

areas– Safety analysis– PRA– Oversight at site during

construction (resident inspectors).

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0123456789

10

Number of staff - project office

year

nu

mb

er


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Full time equivalents on oversight of OL3 - operational safety

year

man

year

s

29PVM/NN

• Core competences for operational safety – Technical specification and

basis– Operation– Maintenance– Operational experiences– Operating organisation – Safety culture– Management systems– Personnel resources, training– Emergency preparedness– Resident inspectors

Oversight OL3 - operational safety

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Number of staff - organisations and operation

year

nu

mb

er


Annual costs of the technical support contracted for OL 3

Oversight OL3 - using of TSOs

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110.00

200,000.00

400,000.00

600,000.00

800,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,600,000.00

1,800,000.00

2,000,000.00

Eu

ro


YVL 1.1: Construction Inspection Programme


YVL 1.1: Construction Inspection Programme

The purpose of STUK’s Construction Inspection Programme is to verify that the operations of the construction licensee ensure high-quality construction and implementation in accordance with the approved designs while complying with the regulations and official decisions concerned. In particular, the Construction Inspection Programme assesses and controls the following issues:• the licensee’s general operations with a view to

constructing the facility• detailed procedures in the various fields of technology

implemented for constructing the facility• dealing with safety matters and consideration of safety in

management procedures• the licensee’s expertise and use of expertise• quality management and quality control.


Construction Inspection Programme

The Construction Inspection Programme is divided into two main levels: the upper level assesses the licensee’s main operations, such as project management and resources management, project control, dealing with safety issues and project quality management.

The next level, known as the operation level, assesses, e.g., project quality assurance, training of the operating personnel, inspection procedures, utilization of the PSA, document management, radiation safety, and structure and component-specific inspections in the various fields of technology. Furthermore, the emergency response arrangements during construction, physical protection, fire protection and nuclear waste treatment are included in the Construction Inspection Programme within the scope STUK considers necessary.

In addition to the above-mentioned inspections, of which the licensee is informed in advance, STUK carries out inspections without prior notice at its discretion.


Inspections and regulatory control required by YVL Guides

STUK controls the construction project, quality management of the construction and the licensee’s safety work with the aid of inspections at its discretion. The inspections pertain, e.g., to the following issues:• project management and control• organization; training, competence and adequacy of the

personneldealing with safety matters• implementation of quality management as a whole and in

the different sectors• control exercised by the licensee concerning the

implementation of quality management by the licensee itself, the facility contractor and their subcontractors.


Buildings and concrete and steel structures

STUK controls the design, manufacture and installation of the buildings and concrete and steel structures important to safety. The control includes• pre-inspection of structures• inspections at the construction site concerning the readiness to begin

work• inspections concerning manufacture• construction inspections of steel structures• commissioning inspections.

The safety class of structures is taken into account when determining the scope of control and setting the requirements. The requirements for and control of concrete and steel structures have been described in Guides YVL 4.1 and YVL 4.2. Fire protection at nuclear facilities is discussed in Guide YVL 4.3.

Only organizations and persons in their employ that have been granted approval by STUK are allowed to carry out inspections and expert duties subject to licence relating to concrete and steel structures. Guides YVL 1.3 and YVL 4.1 deal with these duties and the approval procedures.

http://www.edilex.fi/stuklex/en/lainsaadanto/saannosto/YVL4-1






ComponentsSTUK controls the design, manufacture and installation of pressure equipment and other mechanical components of nuclear facilities. The control includes• inspection of the construction plans for components• approval of the manufacturers and testing organizations• inspections concerning manufacture• construction inspections• installation inspections• commissioning inspections.The safety class of components is taken into account when determining the scope of control and setting the requirements. On the licensee’s application, STUK may approve a separate testing organization to carry out specified control duties. The requirements for and control of mechanical components have been described in Guides YVL 1.3, YVL 1.14 and YVL 1.15 and in YVL Guides of series 3 and 5. Guide YVL 3.0 describes the principles of pressure equipment control. Guide YVL 3.4 presents the requirements for the approval of manufacturers. Guide YVL 1.3 deals with the duties and the approval procedure for inspection and testing duties subject to licence relating to mechanical components.



http://www.stuk.fi/julkaisut_maaraykset/viranomaisohjeet/en_GB/yvl/





ComponentsSTUK controls the design, manufacture and installation of electrical and instrumentation and control equipment of nuclear facilities. The control includes review of the suitability assessment, inspections concerning manufacture and installation to be conducted at STUK’s discretion, and commissioning inspections.

The safety significance of the component concerned is taken into account when determining the scope of control and setting the requirements. The requirements for and control of electrical and instrumentation and control equipment have been described in Guides YVL 5.2 and YVL 5.5. Guides YVL 7.9 and YVL 7.10 give the requirements for radiation protection of nuclear facility workers and monitoring of occupational exposure. Other requirements and control concerning the radiation protection and environmental monitoring of a nuclear facility are discussed in guides of the YVL 7 Guide series.







Nuclear fuel

In accordance with Sections 114 and 115 of the Nuclear Energy Decree, STUK controls that the nuclear fuel is designed, manufactured, transported, stored, handled and used in compliance with the valid regulations.

The nuclear fuel licensing procedure and STUK’s regulatory control measures for nuclear power plants have been described in Guide YVL 6.1.

Guides YVL 6.2, YVL 6.3, YVL 6.4, YVL 6.5, YVL 6.7 and YVL 6.8 give the requirements for the design, manufacture, transport, handling, storage and use of nuclear fuel.

http://www.edilex.fi/stuklex/en/lainsaadanto/19880161/P114









Preparations for operation; organization and training

In accordance with Section 119 of the Nuclear Energy Decree, STUK controls that the organization operating the facility is appropriate and adequate and that the persons involved in the use of nuclear energy meet the competence requirements and that they are given proper training.

Development and training of the operating organization shall begin early enough during the construction of the nuclear power plant (YVL 2.5).When reviewing the administrative rules and organization manual referred to in Section 4.2 above, STUK assesses the appropriateness and adequacy of the licence applicant’s organization and the qualifications required.

In accordance with Section 128 of the Nuclear Energy Decree, the operator of the facility systems in the main control room of a nuclear facility shall have STUK’s approval for this job. The requirements for the nuclear power plant operator licensing and the training of personnel have been defined in Guides YVL 1.6 and YVL 1.7.







Pre-operational testing

The purpose of the pre-operational testing of a nuclear facility is to demonstrate that the facility has been constructed and operates as designed. The testing consists of the following stages:• system performance tests• fuel loading and pre-criticality tests of the reactor systems• making the reactor critical and low-power tests• power tests.

STUK controls the testing of a nuclear facility by reviewing the general testing plans and programmes, by watching the tests at the nuclear facility and by reviewing the documents of test results.

The operation of a nuclear power plant is considered to begin when the loading of nuclear fuel into the reactor begins. The reactor loading requires that the Government has granted an operating licence and that STUK has approved the application concerning fuel loading and the reports on the reactor and fuel behaviour in the first operating cycle.



To ensure that the nuclear facility complies with the regulations applied to it, STUK verifies, in accordance with Section 20 of the Nuclear Energy Act, before the fuel loading that• the documents linked with operation of the facility, referred to in Section 36 of the Nuclear

Energy Decree, are acceptable in all respects• the instruction manuals concerning operation of the facility, including instructions for

accidents and transients, are adequate• the organization operating the nuclear facility is appropriate and adequate• the persons involved in the use of nuclear energy meet the competence requirements• the persons designated as responsible manager for the facility operation and as his/her

deputy have received STUK’s approval• there is a sufficient number of licensed operators at the facility• for operation of the facility, persons who have received STUK’s approval have been

appointed to see to the emergency response arrangements, physical protection and safeguards of nuclear materials

• the commissioning inspections of the facility systems, structures and components have been carried out with acceptable results

• the results of system performance tests are acceptable insofar as it has been possible to perform the testing without the reactor

• pre-service inspections of the structures and components have been completed• physical protection and emergency response arrangements are sufficient• the necessary control to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons has been arranged

appropriately• the licensee of the nuclear facility has arranged indemnification regarding liability in the case

of nuclear damage as prescribed.




The reactor may be made critical and brought to a higher power level in accordance with the decisions taken by STUK.

When the testing has finished, the holder of the operating licence shall assess the results of the testing as a whole. The testing results shall be used to assess, for instance, whether any changes in the Final Safety Analysis Report and in the operational limits and conditions are needed. On the basis of this assessment, the licensee shall make the necessary changes in the operational limits and conditions and in the Final Safety Analysis Report, and submit them to STUK for approval.

Guide YVL 2.5 deals with regulatory control of the testing of nuclear power plants.



Preparation for regulatory oversight of upcoming new build projects


STUK’s preparation tasks for new projects (1/2)

• Collecting and analysing OL3 experience and lessons learned – Collecting OL3 experience by interviewing project key

persons– Collection, classification and analyse of OL3 lessons

from different sources• Presenting targets for construction licence review

according to the new STUK YVL guides • Influencing to licence applicants preparation activities

and organisational preparedness• Possible meetings with licence applicants and

vendors concerning plant design, design maturity and siting


STUK’s preparation tasks for new projects (2/2)

• Coordinate possible applications, e.g. for material manufacturing before granting the construction license

• Advancing STUK’s oversight activities• Producing specifications for project and requirement

management tools• Planning competence and personnel resources for

new oversight projects• Cooperate with national and international regulatory

bodies and organisations


Summary, project management

• Oversight of new build, licence renewals and plant modifications can be organised as projects, beneficial when includes – several technical areas– high safety significance– long time schedules (several years)– large amount of resources (several person-months)

• Generic project management models are applicable for also regulatory oversight projects– Project management processes: initiating, planning, executing, monitoring

and control, and closing– Cost management is reduced to human resource management

• Good planning of use of inspection resources is important but sometimes it is difficult to predict the submitted documents and their schedule

-> licensing plan


Lessons to be learned for New Build

• Regulator need to be well prepared for the project and licensing phases– regulations need to be up-to-date - requirements need to be managed– licensing steps, licensing documentation and regulatory hold points

need to be commonly understood by project parties as well as project schedule and expectations to design completion

– competences and human resources for safety evaluations need to be evaluated and ensured

• TSO support was indispensable for STUK. It was profitable to:– use a limited number of experienced organisations– use organisations that were familiar with design of the plant - but

independent from vendor– focus on the new features.

• Co-operation with other regulators is a good possibility to benchmark requirements, findings and coverage of the review and inspection work.

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Regulatory project management VN/RA/01 Task 1&2 Workshop Hanoi, October.

Documents

project group

project management procedures

project managers

project closing meeting

abc project model

projects progress

oversight work slide

resource management