Top Banner
When Laboratory Testing Turns Against Us: Human Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) Interference with TSH and PTH Assays Sadaf A. Farooqi, MD
17

Sadaf A. Farooqi , MD

Mar 22, 2016

Download

Documents

gita

When Laboratory Testing Turns Against Us : Human Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) Interference with TSH and PTH Assays. Sadaf A. Farooqi , MD. Disclosure. No conflict of interest for the authors Sadaf Farooqi , MD Justin Moore, MD Rami Mortada , MD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

When Laboratory Testing Turns Against Us:Human Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) Interference with TSH and PTH Assays

Sadaf A. Farooqi, MD

Page 2: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Disclosure

No conflict of interest for the authors– Sadaf Farooqi, MD– Justin Moore, MD– Rami Mortada, MD– No financial incentives are involved in this

presentation

Page 3: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Introduction

• Heterophile antibodies, like Human Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) can lead to falsely elevated levels of TSH and PTH

• This occurs in specific “sandwich” immunoassays, leading to expensive investigations and unnecessary treatments

Page 4: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Case Presentation

Case 1 24 yr. old with Hashimoto’s disease♀ Wide fluctuation in her TSH levels (76 to 276 mU/L) normal

0.5-5.0mU/L Multiple escalations of her thyroid hormone dosage lead to a

hospitalization for tachycardia HAMA - 600ng/ml Levothyroxine replacement was reduced to a weight-based

dose (~1.6 mcg/kg/day) Free Thyroxine level was used for subsequent dose adjustment

Page 5: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Case 2• 78 yr. old with CKD presented with secondary ♀

hyperparathyroidism and widely labile PTH levels over one year (60-899 pg/ml; normal 10-65 pg/ml)

• Serum Calcium and vitamin D levels unremarkable• Negative extensive evaluation, including a negative Sestamibi scan• HAMA titer 800ng/ml• Placed on activated vitamin D commensurate with her level of

renal function• Subsequently felt well and no further workup or management was

undertaken

Page 6: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies

Most commonly encountered Heterophile Antibody

10% of the population may have HAMA which can interfere with immunoassays results

Page 7: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Hetrophile Antibodies

HETROPHILE ANTIBODY

Page 8: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Monoclonal Antibodies

Page 9: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

• HAMA have broad reactivity with antibodies of other animal species which are often source of assays antibody

• They can create both false positive and false negative results

Human Anti-Mouse Antibodies

Page 10: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

“Sandwich” Assay True Positive

Page 11: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

False Positive From Interfering

Heterophile Antibody

NO ANYLATE

CAPTURE ANTIBODY

HETEROHILEANTIBODY

LABEL ANTIBODY

Page 12: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Other Tests Affected By Heterophile Antibodies

• Tumor markers: CA 19-9, CEA, AFP• PSA• Troponin I• HCG• Hepatitis • Drug levels

Page 13: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Neutralizing The Effect Of HAMA Strategies

• Repeat test with different assay• HAMA/Heterophile blocking reagents• Serial dilutions• Nonspecific antibody-blocking tubes• Some commercial kits detect HAMA-positive

patient samples

Page 14: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

What Should A Clinician Do?

• Consider Heterophile Antibody interference if there is a discrepancy between clinical presentation and laboratory values

• Clinicians should be aware of this type of interference in routine immunoassays

• Document exposure to drugs and screen patients

Page 15: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

What Clinical Labs Should Do?

• Identify samples-dilution, blocking studies• HAMA assays• Encourage manufactures to make more

effective blockers• Communicate with physicians the limitations

of methodology

Page 16: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

References

Baskin HJ, Cobin RH, Duick DS, et al. AACE thyroid guidelines. Endocr Pract 2002;8:457-69.

Sapin R, Agin A, Gasser F. Misleading high thyrotropin results obtained with a two-site immunometric assay involving a chimeric antibody. Clin Chem 2004;50:946-8. Baskin H J, Cobin R H, Duick D S. et al AACE thyroid guidelines. Endocr Pract 2002. 8457–469.469.

Hollowell J G, Staehling N W, Flanders W D. et al Serum TSH, T4 and thyroid antibodies in the United States population(1988–1994): National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES 3). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002. 87489–499.499.

Cooper D S. Clinical practice: subclinical hypothyroidism. N Engl J Med 2001. 345260–265.265.

Page 17: Sadaf  A.  Farooqi , MD

Questions?