SABP-A-001

Previous Issue: New Next Planned Update: 1 August 2010 Page 1 of 20 Primary contact:Abdelhak Kermad on 874-6121 & Graham R. Robley on 874-6678

Best Practice SABP-A-001 31 July, 2005 Polythionic Acid SCC Mitigation - Materials Selection and Effective Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steels and other Austenitic Alloys Materials and Corrosion Control Standards Committee

Polythionic Acid SCC Mitigation: Materials Selection and Effective

Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steels and other Austenitic Alloys

Document Responsibility: Materials and Corrosion Control SABP-A-001 Issue Date: 31 July 2005 Polythionic Acid SCC Mitigation - Materials Selection and Effective Next Update: 1 August 2010 Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steels and other Austenitic Alloys

Page 2 of 20

Saudi Aramco DeskTop Standards Table of Contents 1 Scope.......................................................................... 3 2 Use of Best Practice.................................................... 3 3 References.................................................................. 4 4 Definitions and Abbreviations...................................... 5 5 Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking (PASCC).............................................. 6 6 Criteria for Soda Ash Washing (Decision Tree).................................................. 10 7 Guidelines for Soda Ash Washing.............................. 11 8 Material Selection Guidelines for New Projects and Upgrades...................................... 13 9 Other PASCC Mitigation Measures............................ 15 10 Health and Safety....................................................... 15 Figure 1 - Sensitization Curves for (a) 304/304L and (b) 321/347..................................... 16 Figure 2 - Dye Penetrant Inspection Showing Extensive OD Cracking Around Welds of Austenitic Stainless Steel (Courtesy API RP571-2003)....................................... 17 Figure 3 - 304 Stainless Steel, Showing Intergranual PASCC Cracking in Base Metal, MAG. X 100 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)................................. 17 Figure 4 - 304 Stainless Steel, Showing Sensitized Microstructure after 18 Years' Service, Mag. x 320 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)................................. 18 Figure 5 - Stainless Steel, Showing Intergranular Fracture of Opepend PASCC Crack, Mag. x 750 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)................................ 18 Figure 6 - Soda Ash Wash Decision Tree for Aged Austenitic Stainless Steel Equipment and Piping ............................................. 19 Attachment 1 Chemical Hazard Bulletin No. 197............ 20


Page 3 of 20

1 Scope

This Saudi Aramco Best Practice supplements NACE RP0170-2004 "Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steels and other Austenitic Alloys from Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking during Shutdown of Refinery Equipment". It specifically provides the following:

Criteria to determine the need for soda ash washing of existing austenitic stainless steel equipment and piping during plant downtime.

Guidelines on the practice and controls related to soda ash washing. Guidelines on material selection for new projects or upgrades. Its purpose is to prevent polythionic acid stress corrosion cracking (PASCC) caused by the reaction of sulfide corrosion products, oxygen (air) and water/moisture during shutdowns. Refineries shall adopt this Best Practice to formulate or revise PASCC mitigation strategies, which are normally documented as RIMs.

Optimized materials selection for new projects or upgrades is the key to equipment reliability. Significant potential cost savings may be achieved when protection by soda ash washing is determined to be unnecessary.

Commentary Note:

In case of discrepancy between this document and NACE RP0170-2004, resolve discrepancy through the Coordinator ME&CCD.

2 Use of Best Practice

2.1 Disclaimer

This Best Practice provides PASCC mitigation guidelines based on current industry practices. Its primary purpose is to provide Saudi Aramco Refineries with strategies to minimize risk of PASCC during plant shutdowns. It is intended for Saudi Aramco internal use only.

Saudi Aramco is a registered trademark of the Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Copyright, Saudi Aramco, 2004.

2.2 Conflicts with Mandatory Standards

In the event of a conflict between this Best Practice and other Mandatory Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards or Specifications, the matter shall be referred to the Coordinator of ME&CCD/CSD for resolution.


Page 4 of 20

3 References

This Best Practice is based on the latest edition of the references below, unless otherwise noted.

3.1 Saudi Aramco References

Saudi Aramco Engineering Standards

SAES-A-206 Positive Material Identification SAES-L-133 Corrosion Protection Requirements for

Pipelines/Piping

Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedures

SAEP-20 Equipment Inspection Schedule SAEP-325 Inspection Requirements for Pressurized

Equipment SAEP-355 Field Metallography and Hardness Testing

Saudi Aramco Materials Specification

01-SAMSS-007 Manufacture of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers

Other Documents

BI-3789 Project Specification for Material Specification and Corrosion Control Rabigh Refinery 1997 Upgrade Project

NACE 02478-2002 Thick-Wall Stainless Steel Piping in Hydroprocessing Units Heat Treatment Issues

NiDI Publication The Role of Stainless Steels in Petroleum Refining 9021 (1977)

R. L. Piehl Stress Corrosion Cracking by Sulfur Acids Proceedings API, Refining Division, 1964

C. H. Samans Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Stainless Steels and Nickel-base Alloys in Polythionic Acids and Copper Sulfate Solution, Corrosion 20, 8 (1964)

NACE 541-1993 Performance of High Nickel Alloys in Refinery and Petrochemical Environments


Page 5 of 20

3.2 Industry Codes and Standards

NACE RP0170-2004 Protection of Austenitic Stainless Steels and other Austenitic Alloys from Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking during Shutdown of Refinery Equipment

API RP571-2003 Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry

ASTM A262-2002 Standard Practices for Detecting Susceptibility to Intergranular Attack in Austenitic Stainless Steels

4 Definitions and Abbreviations

4.1 Definitions

Austenitic Stainless Steels are 300 series stainless alloys with an austenitic microstructure, such as 304, 316, 321 and 347.

Chemical Stabilization involves the addition of titanium (Ti) and niobium (Nb) to minimize sensitization.

Neutralization is the use of alkali to neutralize acid, or vice versa. In this Best Practice, it primarily refers to soda ash solution which is used to neutralize polythionic acids.

Polythionic Acids are sulfur acids with the formula H2SxO6; where x ranges from 3 6. Such acids can form on plant shutdown in certain refinery equipment, especially in units operating in H2/H2S service.

Positive Material Identification is a chemical analysis that includes all alloying elements, including C, Ti and Nb, to determine stabilization ratios.

Sensitization refers to the composition / time / temperature dependent formation of chromium carbides along the grain boundaries of austenitic stainless alloys. Sensitization causes a dramatic loss in corrosion resistance along the grain boundaries and generally occurs in the temperature range 370C to 815C (700F to 1500F).

Sigmatization or Sigma Phase Embrittlement refers to the formation of an iron-chromium phase, affecting austenitic stainless steels. It generally forms with long-time exposure in the range of 565 to 980C (1050 to 1800F).

Soda Ash is a sodium carbonate solution, normally used at 1 5 % concentration.


Page 6 of 20

Stabilization Ratio is the ratio of stabilization element (Ti or Nb) to carbon.

Stress Corrosion Cracking is an environmental cracking phenomenon caused by a combination of a specific corrosive environment and tensile stress on a susceptible material.

Thermal Stabilization is a heat treatment performed on stabilized stainless steels at approximately 900C for 2 4 hours to improve resistance to sensitization and PASCC.

4.2 Abbreviations

Cl-SCC = Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking

HAZ = Heat Affected Zone

PASCC = Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking

PMI = Positive Material Identification

PT = Penetrant Testing

RIM = Refinery Instruction Manual

5 Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking (PASCC)

5.1 Damage Description

PASCC is a type of stress corrosion cracking which can occur rapidly under shutdown or T&I conditions. Cracking is due to sulfur acids forming from sulfide scale, air and moisture acting on sensitized austenitic stainless steels.

It usually occurs adjacent to welds or high stress areas. Cracking may propagate rapidly (in a matter of minutes or hours) through

the wall thickness of piping and components.

5.2 Susceptible Materials

300 series stainless steels, Alloy 600/600H, Alloy 625, Alloy 800/800H and Alloy 825.

Commentary Note

It is noted that Alloy 625 and 825 are much more sensitization-resistant than the 300 series stainless steels, with a sensitization threshold at about 650C (1200F).


Page 7 of 20

5.3 Principal Factors

A combination of environment, material and stress are required to promote PASCC:

o Environment - Metals form a surface sulfide scale when exposed to some sulfur compounds, notably hydrogen sulfide, and organic sulfides. The scale may react with air (oxygen) and moisture to form sulfur acids (polythionic acids).

o Material - The material must be in a susceptible, i.e. "sensitized" condition.

o Stress - Residual or applied tensile stress. Residual stresses are often sufficient to promote cracking.

Affected alloys become sensitized during exposure to elevated temperatures during fabrication, welding or high temperature service.

The carbon content and the thermal history of the alloy have a significant effect on sensitization susceptibility. Regular and controlled carbon grades of stainless steels such as types 304/304H and 316/316H are particularly susceptible to sensitizing in the weld HAZ. Low carbon "L" grades (< 0.03% C) are less susceptible and usually can be welded without sensitizing. The L grades will not sensitize provided long term operating temperatures do not exceed 400C (750F). Time - Temperature sensitization curves have generally been adopted by industry for 304, 304L, 321 and 347 grades (Figure 1).

5.4 Affected Units or Equipment

All units where alloys that may become sensitized are used in sulfur-containing environments. Commonly damaged equipment includes but is not limited to heat exchanger tubes, furnace tubes and piping.

FCC units (air rings, plenums, slide valves, cyclone components, expansion joint bellows and piping).

Hydroprocessing units (reactors, heater tubes, hot feed/effluent exchanger tubes, bellows).

Crude and Coker units (piping).


Page 8 of 20

Commentary Note

At the time of developing this Best Practice, no austenitic stainless steel type 300 components exist in Saudi Aramco Crude/Vacuum units.

5.5 PASCC Characteristics

Typically occurs next to welds, but can also occur in the base metal (Figures 2, 3). It is usually quite localized and may not be evident until a leak appears during start-up or, in some cases, operation.

Sensitized microstuctures (Figure 4) are susceptible to cracking that propagates in an intergranular (along grain boundaries) mode (Figures 3, 5).

Metal loss is usually negligible. 5.6 PASCC Mitigation

Effective mitigation involves both material selection and control of process parameters. Material selection is used to specify sensitization-resistant alloys and heat treatments. Process aspects address shutdown procedures to control the environment, by preventing polythionic acid formation or including a soda ash wash neutralization step.

Material Factors

Low carbon grades such as 304L/316L afford some improvement over controlled carbon grades (Figure 1). The L grades will sensitize if exposed more than several hours above about 538C (1000F) or long term above 400C (750F).

Improved resistance to PASCC can be achieved with modified versions of these alloys containing small amounts of Ti and Nb. These chemically-stabilized grades include types 321 and 347 and also nickel base Alloys 825 and 625.

A thermal stabilization heat treatment at 900C (1650F) may be applied to chemically stabilized austenitic stainless steels after welding to reduce sensitization and PASCC susceptibility. This heat treatment may be difficult to apply in the field.

Thermal stabilization heat treatment is recommended for heater tubes and welds.


Page 9 of 20

However, for thicker wall piping (>1 inch) or equipment operating below 427C, thermal stabilization is not recommended. Experience has shown that the risks of reheat cracking and sigma phase embrittlement outweigh the benefits of thermal stabilization of thicker wall material.

Some ASTM specifications permit mill products to be shipped in a thermally stabilized rather than solution annealed condition, as a supplementary requirement.

Susceptibility to PASCC can be determined by laboratory corrosion testing according to ASTM A262 Practice C. A sensitizing heat treatment is applied to low-carbon (L) and chemically stabilized stainless steel grades prior to testing.

Process factors:

If feasible, do not open equipment to air at temperatures where atmospheric condensation might occur. Use inert gas blankets (see NACE RP0170-2004, Section 3) or use dry air (see NACE RP0170-2004, Section 5) to exclude condensation of water. Also, condensation can be prevented if equipment is heated and maintained at temperatures above the dewpoint, e.g. fired heaters.

Some equipment or processes can be severely damaged by contact with water. Some catalyst systems must not contact water or other aqueous solutions. In selecting a PASCC control methodology, consider both the positives and negatives of each method on the total system. Split systems into smaller segments and address accordingly.

If equipment containing sensitized stainless steels is to be opened or exposed to air, preventive measures should be taken to minimize or eliminate PASCC. These include flushing the equipment with soda ash solution to neutralize sulfur acids immediately after or during shutdown or purging with dry nitrogen or nitrogen/ammonia during the shutdown to prevent air exposure.

5.7 Inspection and Monitoring

Penetrant Testing (PT) examination can be used to detect PASCC (Figure 2). However, because the cracks are filled with a tight deposit, flapper disc sanding may be needed to improve the PT sensitivity.

PASCC can be an inspection challenge because the cracking may not occur until well into a turnaround.


Page 10 of 20

Monitoring for PASCC during operation is not usually practical. Conditions causing the cracking are not usually present while operating.

6 Criteria for Soda Ash Washing (Decision Tree)

If the proponent wishes to eliminate soda ash neutralization, a careful verification of installed metallurgy and thermal history is essential. CSD/MEU has developed a methodology based on a decision tree, addressing this issue.

A decision tree for soda ash washing for existing equipment and piping is presented in Figure 6. Requirements for new equipment/upgrades are addressed in Section 8.

The key points to consider in applying this decision tree are as follows:

Alloy verification to confirm austenitic material type and stabilization ratios for 321 and 347 grades. Specifically, stabilization ratios shall be as follows:

o Greater than 8 for Ti:C and o Within the range 10 to 12 for Nb:C

Review of thermal history to establish maximum metal temperature. o For stabilized materials, i.e. 321 and 347 grades, a maximum metal temperature

limit of 455C is permitted. If the representative thermal history shows that this metal temperature has been exceeded, then a soda ash wash is required.

Commentary Note

For fired equipment, the metal temperature is usually derived from skin thermocouple records. Accordingly, such equipment must be fitted with reliable skin thermocouples. For other equipment, e.g. exchangers, the process temperature is regarded as representative of the metal temperature.

o For non-stabilized grades, i.e. 304/316, a soda ash wash is required at every shutdown. It is noted that at temperatures below 370C sensitization is not anticipated for these grades.

Perform field sensitization test. Testing is based on field metallography, using ASTM A262 Practice A, in addition to a complementary electrochemical (potentiostatic) technique that is under development (Technology Item proposal).

For stabilized materials operating above 455C, soda ash washing must be applied at the first shutdown. This should be immediately followed by a field sensitization test to check degree of sensitization. If the material is not sensitized, then the soda ash wash can be skipped at the next shutdown, but re-applied at the subsequent shutdown. The cycle of monitoring sensitization (repeating sensitization test) and skipping soda ash wash at subsequent shutdowns can be repeated (Figure 6, Pale


Page 11 of 20

Blue Cycle). This approach shall be followed regardless of the operating interval between shutdowns.

7 Guidelines for Soda Ash Washing

The guidelines given below are supplementary to those of NACE RP0170-2004.

7.1 Key Requirements

Plants shall develop a RIM based on process licensor's guidelines. This RIM shall include the following key points:

1) Soak or circulate for 2 to 3 hours, reversing flow every 30 minutes if possible. Circulation is preferred to ensure wetting of vapor pockets in equipment such as furnace tubes. Never open equipment then spray.

2) Monitor and record solution pH (> 9) and chlorides (< 250 mg/L [250 ppmw]), on an hourly basis.

3) A protective residual film of soda ash will remain after draining, even after the equipment has dried. Do not rinse or wash off the residual film before putting equipment back in service.

4) This equipment should then be kept dry and out of the weather to the greatest practical extent to avoid washing away of the protective film.

5) When cleaning, high pressure jetting, or repair work is needed, the protective soda ash film might be destroyed. The time without protection should be minimized and a soda ash film reapplied as quickly as possible. For high pressure jetting or other washing operations, it is recommended that a 1 wt% solution of Na2CO3 be used.

6) It is generally not necessary to re-apply the film unless the protective film was been washed-off or mechanically removed or damaged.

7) Care should be taken during startup and shutdown to avoid washing away a film and exposing equipment to air and water (e.g., hydrotesting, steam out. Refer Section 7.2.2).

8) If hydrotesting is required, this shall be carried out using a soda ash solution.


Page 12 of 20

7.2 Additional Requirements for Specific Equipment

The following requirements apply to process side (hydrocarbon) environments only. External soda ash washing of fire-side surfaces is not required (Refer 7.2.3).

7.2.1 Vertical Tube Furnaces - Not Steam-Air Decoked

During neutralization of vertical furnace tubes, it is difficult to achieve thorough wetting of the top U-bends during filling and removal of soda ash during flushing and draining. Thus, the solution should be circulated at a high rate (to provide turbulent flow) to ensure wetting of the upper U-bends and to remove vapor from the downflow tubes.

When removing solution for maintenance or storage, the tubes should be blown with dry air or inert gas; this will result in a protective soda ash film on the tubes.

If short term (< 2 weeks) work is planned, no further treatment is necessary.

For long term outage (> 2 weeks) the tubes should be blown dry with air or inert gas and sealed with a slight positive pressure of dry inert gas.

7.2.2 Furnace Tubes - Steam-Air Decoked

During cool down after decoking, condensed steam and air can coexist and could result in PASCC. To prevent this, 5000 ppm NH3 should be injected into the steam during the final phase of steaming-out or decoking. This ammoniated steam can then be displaced with soda ash as required. Alternatively, nitrogen purging (9.1) can be used.

7.2.3 Furnace Tubes - External Washing

Under normal combustion conditions (non-reducing), fireside scales do not contain sulfides. Therefore, PASCC is unlikely and external soda ash washing is unnecessary.

7.2.4 Reactors

Reactors with stabilized or low carbon austenitic weld overlays, and confirmed to be operating at temperatures below 455C, do not require soda ash washing, since they are resistant to PASCC. This also applies to stabilized wrought internals.


Page 13 of 20

If soda ash washing of any component in the reactor circuit (reactors, heaters, exchangers and transfer piping) is judged to be necessary based on metallurgy/service history, soda ash neutralization of the reactor circuit must be followed by washing with ammoniated condensate.

Due to their large volume and presence of catalyst, soda ash washing of reactors is often impractical. Additionally, sodium is a catalyst poison. Therefore, the most practical means of protecting reactors is by inerting or keeping dry.

Note dry air can be used only if the catalyst has been regenerated to convert the bulk of the pyrophoric iron sulfide which is usually present. However, soda ash wash can be used for protecting reactors after the catalyst has been dumped or even for wet dumping catalyst when replacement is planned.

Both filling and hosing down the walls with soda ash have been used. Recirculating the soda ash solution is acceptable for hosing purposes provided the alkalinity is maintained.

8 Material Selection Guidelines for New Projects and Upgrades

For new projects or upgrades with well-specified sensitization-resistant materials, the practice of soda ash washing may be unnecessary, leading to potentially significant cost savings in the early life of the equipment or pipe.

Therefore, when the risk of PASCC is judged to be low, based on optimum material selection, alloy verification (PMI), fabrication practices and process design parameters, the Materials Engineering Unit of CSD shall be consulted to determine the need for soda ash washing. Since PASCC is time - temperature dependent, this approach:

Is applicable to newly-installed plant, equipment or pipe. Is valid for a limited service period, e.g. up to 2nd Turnaround or 7 years maximum. Equipment is subject to normal operation with no undue process upset or

temperature excursion. Therefore, it is paramount that Operations maintain comprehensive metal/process temperature records of the subject austenitic stainless steels components.

Subsequent service beyond the 2nd Turnaround requires full re-evaluation based on criteria given in Section 5.


Page 14 of 20

Accordingly, for new Saudi Aramco projects and upgrades with potential PASCC risk, optimum material specification and heat treatments (for base materials and welds during manufacture) shall include the following requirements, to enhance PASCC and Cl-SCC resistance:

1) Use chemically stabilized grades such as 321/321H or 347/347H or low-carbon grades, and

Commentary Note:

It is recognized that 347/347H offer better PASCC resistance than 321/321H.

2) Apply the following heat treatments:

a) Solution annealing at 1040 1070C for - hour per inch followed by water quenching for 321/321H and 347/347H, and

b) Stabilization 850 900C for 4 hours followed by rapid air cooling.

c) The adequacy of the above heat treatments must be verified by an intergranular corrosion/sensitization test, i.e. ASTM A262 Practice C.

3) For 321 stainless steels, the Ti:C stabilization ratio shall be greater than or equal to 8.

4) For 347 stainless steels, the Nb:C stabilization ratio shall be within the range 10 to 12.

Commentary Note

Sigmatization is promoted by the presence of Nb. Accordingly, an upper limit of 12 is imposed on Nb:C ratio.

5) Chemically-stabilized 321/347 grades are preferred materials for best PASCC resistance. However, low-carbon grades 304L or 316L can be used for certain applications, e.g. heat exchanger tubes, provided they are in the solution-annealed condition (2a).

6) Use chemically-stabilized austenitic weld or low-carbon weld metals for overlays. Industry experience indicates that such overlays are resistant to PASCC.

7) For fired heater tubing or other components operating above 455C (metal temperature), items 1 to 4 above are required. However, for thicker wall piping (>1 inch) or equipment operating below 427C, thermal stabilization is not recommended due to the risks of reheat cracking and sigma phase embrittlement. Therefore, thermal stabilization is not recommended for thick wall components.


Page 15 of 20

8) For heat exchanger U-bends made of unstabilized grades, e.g. 304L, solution anneal the entire tube at 1070C after bending (item 2a). Use stabilized grades 321 or 347 if only the U-bends can be heat treated.

9) For drains, where there is a risk of Cl-SCC due to water entrapment during shutdowns, a stress relief heat treatment at 870 - 900C for 1 hour per inch followed by rapid air cooling is required. An alternative is to specify low-point drains in Cl-SCC resistant alloys, such as Alloy 825 or 625.

10) PASCC failures of Alloy 800 exchanger tubing in Hydroprocessing Units have been reported; these were attributed to sensitization caused by stress relief heat treatment or welding. Therefore, where Alloy 800 is specified for such tubing, this shall be ordered to a maximum carbon content of 0.03%; alternatively, the stabilized Alloy 801 or Alloy 825 can be used.

9 Other PASCC Mitigation Measures

9.1 Nitrogen Purging

Nitrogen purging is an alternative to neutralization. The nitrogen should be pure, dry and oxygen-free.

A positive nitrogen pressure should be maintained. For steam-air decoking (7.2.2), steam injection should be stopped before the metal temperature cools to 72C above the water dew point. When depressurized, but before further cooling, the system should be purged with dry nitrogen.

9.2 Dry Air Purging

The use of dry air is another approach reduce risk of PASCC. The incoming air dew point must be maintained at a temperature well below internal metal temperature to prevent water condensation. The recommended temperature differential (metal temperature minus dew point temperature) is at least 22C.

10 Health and Safety

Health and Safety guidelines concerning handling and disposal of soda ash solution are given in the Chemical Hazard Bulletin (Attachment 1). This states that sodium carbonate is a severe irritant to the eyes, skin and respiratory tract and hence Personal Protective Equipment shall include wearing goggles, neoprene gloves and dust mask if handling solid powder. In addition, operators shall contact Environmental Protection Department, Dhahran, for safe disposal of the solution.

Revision Summary

31 July 2005 New Saudi Aramco Best Practice.


Page 16 of 20

Figure 1 - Sensitization Curves for (a) 304/304L and (b) 321/347

Time/Temperature-SensitizationDiagram for Types 304 & 304L

Stainless Steels

Type 304

Type 304L

1 10 100 1,000 10,000Time at Heat Treating Temperature

HoursSource: Piehl

1200

1100

1000

900

650

600

550

500

450

C F

(a)

Time/Temperature-SensitizationDiagram for Types 321 & 347

Stainless Steels

Type 321

Type 347

1 10 100 1,000 10,000Time at Heat Treating Temperature

HoursSource: Piehl

1200

1100

1000

900

650

600

550

500

450

C F

(b)


Page 17 of 20

Figure 2 - Dye penetrant inspection showing extensive OD cracking around welds of austenitic stainless steel (Courtesy API RP571-2003)

Figure 3 - 304 stainless steel, showing intergranular PASCC cracking in base metal, mag. x100 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)


Page 18 of 20

Figure 4 - 304 stainless steel, showing sensitized microstructure after 18 years' service, mag. x320 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)

Figure 5 - 304 stainless steel, showing intergranular fracture of opened PASCC crack, mag. x750 (Ref. CSD/ME&CCD/L-1445/98)


Page 19 of 20

Figure 6 Soda Ash Wash Decision Tree for Aged Austenitic Stainless Steel Equipment and Piping


Page 20 of 20

Attachment 1

SABP-A-001

Documents

austenitic alloys materials

austenitic alloys page

corrosion control sabp

pascc mitigation measures

intergranual pascc cracking

soda ash washing decision

best practice sabp

material selection guidelines