Page 1
New Horizons, No Boundaries
O-I Case Study: Lean Six Sigma — Not Just for Manufacturing Anymoreby Dan Rubin, Senior Consultant and Alina Haas, O-I, VP Human Resources
May 1-3, 2011
© 2011 Towers Watson. All rights reserved.
2011 HR Service Delivery Forum
Page 2
2
World’s leading glass packaging company
Who is O-I?
Asia PacificNorth America EuropeLatin America
A market leader in all regions in which we operate
Page 3
3
We are a truly global company
$6.6 billion in net sales in 2010
24,000+ employees
81 plants in 21 countries
Joint ventures in five countries
1,900+ worldwide patents
13 official languages
World headquarters in the United States (Perrysburg, Ohio)
Page 4
4
We are a
preferred partner for many global brands
Glass packaging for beer, wine and spirits, food and non-alcoholic
beverages
Glass packaging for drug and chemical industries
Tableware, including stemware
Page 5
5
What is Lean Six Sigma
Continuous improvement philosophy that
combines traditional Lean Manufacturing
approach with Six Sigma DMAIC
methodology
Page 6
6
DMAICProcess Improvement Road Map
Define the problem, the voice of the customer and the project goals
Measure key aspects of the current process and collect relevant
data
Analyze the data to investigate and verify cause-and-effect
relationships. Seek out root cause of the defect under investigation
Improve or optimize the current process based upon data analysis
Control the future state process to ensure that any deviations from
target are corrected before they result in defects
Page 7
THE ENGAGEMENT SURVEYLean Six Sigma in Practice
Page 8
8
Overarching Principles
Build broad-based support and process
discipline by engaging all regions and
major functions in development, delivery,
analysis and survey action planning
Segment employee population to allow for
meaningful analysis and clear
accountability for follow-up
Establish appropriate benchmarks
(manufacturing, high-performing
companies, country-specific norms)
Survey must generate actionable
outcomes
Page 9
9
Kaizen Charter
Deliver global employee engagement survey to 22,000+ employees
during a four week period
Measure global and regional employee engagement against O-I’s
strategic priorities
Assess changes since prior leadership-only survey
Develop on-going tracking and reporting process to hold organization
accountable to improvement
Identify linkages between key ongoing initiatives and employee
engagement
Build accountability for improvement into managerial performance
assessment
Page 10
10
LSS Process
Pre-Kaizen
Team member selection
Teams and role definition
Participant pre-work
Kaizen
Part I — Survey design and development (2 days)
Part II — IT considerations, metrics and survey
logistics (2 days)
Part III — Communications strategy (2 days)
Post Kaizen
Communication plan
Survey administration strategy
Manager and HR support tools
Results rollout
Page 11
11
Pre-KaizenTeam Member Selection
Individual Characteristics
Key leader in area of expertise
Knowledgeable in regional/functional issues
International exposure
Ability to express opinions and ideas clearly and
confidently
Fully empowered to make decisions and take action
Able to devote up to five hours of pre-work in
preparation for Kaizen
Team Structure
HR Communications Finance
Technical LSS Black Belt Business
Page 12
12
Pre-KaizenPre-work is essential to success
Gather Voice of the Customer from regional and functional leaders
and key stakeholders
Complete organizational hierarchy
Page 13
13
Finalize Questions
Identify carryover questionsValidate against
topics/initiativesFit to 20 minutes
Questions Reviewed and Selected Based on Best Fit to Survey Objectives
Item selection checks
and balances
continually revisited
Reality check on
content and project
scope
Rationalization of
questions
Analysis and
revalidation of themes
Kaizen — Survey Design & Development Category and Question Selection Process
Survey Categories Distributed to Teams
Page 14
14
Survey Design
Category Selection and Alignment
Towers Watson
Categories and
Questions
O-I
Categories and
Questions
O-I Initiatives
Category
Empowerment
Change Readiness
Wellness Culture
Category
Risk-Taking
This company has
established a
culture where:
People can
challenge our
traditional ways of
doing things.
O-I has established
a culture where:
People can
challenge our
traditional ways of
doing things.
Index Score
provides metric for
questions related
to specific
initiatives.
Page 15
15
Kaizen — Survey Design & Development Selecting Survey Questions
Is the question relevant for the global
employee population?
Can the question measure achievement
against O-I’s strategic focus areas?
Is normative data available for this
question?
Will we be able to take action as a result
of the data gathered from the question?
Does changing the question of a
normed question add real value?
Data — Key Issues
Normed/Not Normed
In Scope/Out of Scope
Strategic/Tactical
Validated/Non-Validated
Page 16
16
Kaizen — Survey Logistics Survey Delivery Process — Paper
Suppliers Inputs Process Outputs Customers
Surveys Submitted
Survey tool kit
Paper surveys
Communication
Towers-Watson
Comm. team
Kaizen team
Employees
Local Mgmt
Senior Mgmt
Receive
tool kit
Develop Location strategy
Prep &
Setup
Schedule
& admin
survey
Ship surveys back to
TW
Close
out
survey
Input Metrics Process Metrics Output Metrics
Quality
Speed
CostNumber of
paper surveys
15-20 minutes per survey
75 – 80% participation
rate
Customer
Employees
Kaizen TeamSenior Mgt
Senior MgtKaizen team
OT Hours
Page 17
17
Survey Delivery Process - Paper
Pro
cto
rT
ow
ers
-
Wa
tso
n
Lo
ca
l
Co
ord
ina
tor
Em
plo
ye
eR
eg
ion
al
HR
Re
pL
ea
de
rsh
ipP
lan
t
Ma
na
ge
r
Receive Tool
Kits
Receive Tool
Kits
Logistics
Room setup
Food
Create a Launch
Team
Communication
promotion of
survey
Communication
promotion of
survey
Communication
promotion of
survey
Assign
Coordinators
Setup survey
schedule
Setup survey
schedule
Complete
surveys
Train proctors
on roles and
expectations
Administer
survey
Evaluate
response rate
Communication
Track overall
plant response
rate
Evaluate
response rate
Thank employees
for completing
survey
Kaizen — Survey Logistics Swimlane for Paper Survey Delivery Process
Page 18
18
Kaizen - Survey Logistics High-level Project Timeline
Step Date Responsibility
1 Send Kaizen pre-work to participants June 3 O-I
2 Return pre-work assignments June 17 O-I
3 Complete planning for Kaizen event June 18 O-I/JB/TW
4 Survey design and development – Kaizen Part 1 June 21-22 O-I/TW
5 Tech requirements, metrics, logistics – Kaizen Part 2 June 23-24 O-I/IT
6 Communication strategy – Kaizen Part 3 June 28-29 O-I/TW
7Finalize communication strategy/plan for survey
launch/administration July 2 O-I/JB
8Sign-off on all survey content, including
demographicsJuly 2 O-I
9Finalize senior leadership participant list (those who
will receive the leadership supplement)July 2 O-I
10Align senior leadership HRIS information with
demographicsJuly 6-16 O-I/TW
11 Set up English online and paper surveys . . . etc. July 6-12 TW
Page 19
19
KaizenCommunication Strategy
Communication Objectives — Examples
Launch and Administration Results and Action Planning
Provide rationale for “why survey and why
now”
Define “what’s in it for me” for all key
stakeholders
Share high-level results, key themes and
overarching priorities (don’t drown people
with data)
Set expectations about action and the
plan to make this happen
Barriers and Challenges
Launch and Administration Results and Action Planning
Complexity of 13 different languages and
two survey methods (paper and online)
Participation in light of conflicting priorities
Skepticism — what could I lose if I answer
this survey honestly?
Risk of “dead space” between time
employees take the survey in Sep/Oct and
results/action planning in 2011
Ongoing commitment of resources at local
levels
Page 20
20
Post KaizenNext Steps
Final survey sign-off from key stakeholders
Project plan and timeline
Communication
• Elevator speech — talking points for report out to stakeholders
• Participant invitation to survey
• Define survey terminology
Page 21
21
Post-KaizenDeliverables
Communication plan finalized and disseminated
Survey administration toolkits developed in 13 languages for regional
and corporate locations
Train-the-trainer workshop
Employee feedback sessions held
Your Voice collaboration space launched
Page 22
22
Project Plan
The project plan
was updated for the
remaining project activities
We are here at the
close of the event
Page 23
23
Post-Kaizen RACI
R = Person(s) who is responsible for performing the action/task
A = Person who is held accountable for action/task completion
C = Person(s) who is consulted before performing the action/task
I = Person(s) who is informed after performing the action/task
Page 24
24
Storyboard:
Global Employee Engagement Survey
Project Goal Results & Outcome Process Sustainability
Survey requirement is to
have an average
completion time of 15 to
20 minutes
Global manufacturing
company response rate
benchmark:
75 – 80%
(2008 response rate –
93%)
Name of Survey: Your Voice
Incorporated data from the following surveys:
HPP, Change Readiness, LSS, Pathways into
survey design
Determined delivery method which will be a
combination of paper and web based approach
Survey will be translated into 13 languages
Communication strategy was developed to
engage the location coordinators, management
and the O-I population
Business linkage analysis developed to include
the addition of internal O-I metrics to survey
results to determine correlations between
engagement and business results
Project Plan revised with
Towers Watson (TW) and
task ownership
established
A follow-up Kaizen will be
conducted in early 2011 to
establish the action
planning process
Location coordinators
have been identified to
carry out the process at
the local levels to
maximize participation and
handle daily tasks for
survey administration
TEAM
Back Row:
Front Row:
Sponsor: Alina Haas
LSS Black Belt: Mike Petrous
Page 25
25
Key Learnings
Pre-work added value to survey results
Access to dedicated subject matter experts invaluable
Participation was rewarding
End product is better by virtue of team diversity
We are proud of the product delivered through a disciplined process
Cross-functional and cross-regional participation in Kaizen creates
win for team and O-I
Fosters long-term work relationships
Reduced survey creation time by 80%
S6-Talent Management – O-1 Case Study