Top Banner
IEEE C57 12 38 IEEE C57.12.38 LV bushing cantilever strength analysis Justin Pezzin, P.Eng Carlos Gaytan March 2012
14

S12-LVBushingCantilever-Presentation

Nov 06, 2015

Download

Documents

anupam789

S12-LVBushingCantilever-Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • IEEE C57 12 38IEEE C57.12.38

    LV bushing cantilever strength analysis

    Justin Pezzin, P.Eng, gCarlos Gaytan

    March 2012

  • Overview

    Problem description

    LV bushing force diagram

    Review of manufacturer specifications

    Discussion / Next actions

  • Problem descriptionp

    Oil egress past the LV bushings of 1 ph pad Oil egress past the LV bushings of 1-ph pad mounted transformers has been identified as a failure mode related to the torque applied to the q ppbushing by the attached wires.

  • LV bushing force diagramg g

  • Specifications summary

    Cantilever strength

    Manufacturer A5/8 stud = 250 ft-lb1 stud = 300 ft-lb

    Manufacturer B 80 ft-lb

    Manufacturer C Not available

  • Discussion / next actions

    Is this a general issue?

    Is standardization required?

    Can we make a decision today?Can we make a decision today?

  • Standards on LV Bushing Cantileverg

    IEC 60137 2008 Ins lated b shings for alternating IEC 60137- 2008. Insulated bushings for alternating voltages above 1 000 VCantilever Load requirements:Cantilever Load requirements: 300 N (67.4 lb) for Ir 800 A 1 000 N (224.8 lb) for Ir >800 A( )

    IEEE Std C57.19.01. Performance CharacteristicsIEEE Std C57.19.01. Performance Characteristics and Dimensions for Outdoor Apparatus Bushings Does not cover LV Bushings (Scope: 34.5 kV and above)

  • IEC 60137- 2008 Test Method

    bushing shall be completely assembled and filled with the bushing shall be completely assembled and filled with the insulating medium specified

    A pressure equal to 1 bar 0,1 bar (14.7 psig 1.47 p q , ( p gpsig), above the maximum operating pressure shall be applied inside the bushing

    Load shall be applied perpendicular to the axis of the Load shall be applied perpendicular to the axis of the bushing at the mid-point of the terminal for 60 s

    Bushing passes if there is no evidence of damage g p g(deformation, rupture or leakage) and if it has withstood a repetition of all routine tests without significant change from previous resultsfrom previous results

  • Force Applied for Cantilever Testpp

    Cantile er Load = Torq e AppliedCantilever Load = Torque Applied

    Cantilever Load = Force * Distance

    Si L d i fi d th tSince Load is fixed, the torque applied varies with the length of the LV bushing and its terminal

    ForceDistanceDistance

    in/ftLoad

    lbTorque

    ft-lb6 / 0.5 224.8 112.46 / 0.5 224.8 112.4

    8 / 0.75 224.8 168.610 / 0.833 224.8 187.2

  • Standards on LV Bushing Cantileverg

    Most LV Bushing Manufacturers specify the cantilever Most LV Bushing Manufacturers specify the cantilever torque used on their certification testing

    The following is a sample of the cantilever torque values that g p qare published for LV Bushings:

    Stud diam. Max. Current Bush. Torque Max. load distance(in) (Amp) ft-lb in / ft5/8 830 250 13.34 / 1.111 1500 280 to 375 14.9 / 1.24 (*)

    1 2200 320 17.1 / 1.42

    (*) Worst case

  • Standards on LV Bushing Cantileverg

    Conclusions:Conclusions: No current IEEE Std. Covers LV Bushing requirements IEC 60137 Standard provides cantilever requirements for LV

    Bushings Most LV Bushing manufacturers provide cantilever torque test

    values that would meet IEC 60137 requirements for std. qdimensions of bushing-terminal assemblies

    Concerns would raise on larger terminals that would cause torque distances above 12 where mechanical support may be requireddistances above 12 , where mechanical support may be required

    Findings may suggest to review any reported issues, to determine whether a LV bushing standardization is needed