WW event selection with new Electron ID in 2011 data S. Li 1,2 , Y. Liu 1 E. Monnier 2 , Z. Zhao 1 Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China 1 & Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, CNRS/IN2P3 2 1
47
Embed
S. Li 1,2, Y. Liu 1 E. Monnier 2, Z. Zhao 1 Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China 1 & Centre de Physique.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
WW event selection with new Electron ID in 2011
data
S. Li1,2, Y. Liu1
E. Monnier2, Z. Zhao1
Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China1
& Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, CNRS/IN2P32
2
No need to apply Electron Energy rescale for 2011 data (Rel 16.6):
No need to apply Jet OffsetEtaJES correction for 2011 data if >16.6.1 release, no new JetUserGuide available. Jet_*OriginEM yielding 0 value for both 2011 data and mc10, need consulting the latest MC10 approximation in the latest JetUserGuide version:
Both tight and medium+iso+Blayer electron ID spotted the same 9 events in black Green colored: events came up when increasing the jet pt threshold for tight Yellow colored: events came up when increasing the jet pt threshold for medium
New Events in 2011 data by WW baseline selection
ch RunNumber
EventNumber
LB METrel/GeV
pT(ll)/GeV
Inv.M(ll)/GeV
ee 178044 31696531 335 44.6 19.0 254.9
eµ 178044 26558144 292 76.3 71.6 95.3
eµ 178044 7409347 143 71.0 53.7 17.5
eµ 178109 57534414 664 22.4 30.0 94.5
µµ 178044 10718887 170 43.2(MET=52.5)
6.7 75.9
µµ 178044 10796683 171 53.8 52.1 80.1
µµ 178044 46488279 477 75.8 69.8 104.1
µµ 178109 57138213 659 51.0 63.5 78.8
µµ 178109 66584945 765 66.2 72.7 44.9
eµ 178109 58498409 674 25.2(MET=30.9)
12.8 53.8
µµ 178109 48377288 566 117.5 122.2 31.9
eµ 178044 34058470 357 43.6 35.0 79.2
eµ 178109 69695548 801 48.2 27.2 46.3
4
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 2 5 9 2 2 8 13
WW→ll 0.84 1.22 4.81 5.74 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
8.80±0.07
DiBoson 0.04 0.43 0.50 2.10 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
2.64±0.17
Top 0.11 0.16 0.43 0.54 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.85±0.05
Wjets 0. 1.59 0.17 6.30 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
7.97±0.95
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 1.45 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
1.54±0.39
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.08 0.43 0.56 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.77±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: new caloIso (caloIso98), reweight NOT applied
5
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 1 5 6 2 2 8 9
WW→ll 0.84 0.89 4.81 4.90 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
7.64±0.06
DiBoson 0.04 0.06 0.50 0.60 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
0.78±0.07
Top 0.11 0.12 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.70±0.05
Wjets 0. 0. 0.17 0.64 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
0.73±0.30
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
0.77±0.27
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.05 0.43 0.45 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.63±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: Medium++ + old Isolation(etcone30<6GeV)
6
ee eµ µµ All ch
T M T M T M T M
Data 1 1 5 5 2 2 8 8
WW→ll 0.84 0.91 4.81 4.93 1.84 1.84 7.49±0.06
7.67±0.06
DiBoson 0.04 0.07 0.50 0.63 0.12 0.12 0.65±0.05
0.81±0.07
Top 0.11 0.14 0.43 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.69±0.05
0.73±0.05
Wjets 0. 0. 0.17 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.26±0.15
0.81±0.31
Zjets 0. 0. 0.68 0.68 0.09 0.09 0.77±0.27
0.77±0.27
DrellYan 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW→l+tau 0.05 0.06 0.43 0.45 0.13 0.13 0.61±0.01
0.64±0.02
JF17 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
WW selection on 2010 reprocessed data and MC10 with bunch train pile-up: Medium++ + new caloIso (caloIso98)
7
ee channel: METrel (2010, 35.2pb-1)MEDIUM++ + ISO
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
8
ee channel: Di-lepton pT (2010, 35.2pb-
1)
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
MEDIUM++ + ISO
9
ee channel: Di-lepton inv. mass (2010, 35.2pb-
1)
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
MEDIUM++ + ISO
10
eµ channel: METrel (2010, 35.2pb-1)
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
MEDIUM++ + ISO
11
eµ channel: Di-lepton pT (2010, 35.2pb-
1)
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
MEDIUM++ + ISO
12
eµ channel: Di-lepton inv. mass (2010, 35.2pb-
1)
TIGHTMEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
MEDIUM++ + ISO
13
Pile-Up effects in 2011 data:Using Zmumu sample (Without JES correction)
20102011
14
Pile-Up effects in 2011 data:Using Zmumu sample (With JES correction)
20102011
15
Jet Multiplicities w.r.t. various NVtx bin:2010 normalized to 2011(Without JES correction)
16
Jet Multiplicities w.r.t. various NVtx bin:2010 normalized to 2011(With JES correction)
17
Sample fake factor
Electron Tight ID
Medium+ Iso+ Bayer
Medium+++new iso
Medium+++old iso
Data 0.032 0.364 0.055 0.035
JF17 0.016 0.225 0.026 0.017Data with MC subtraction
Electron Medium+iso+BLayer ID: FakeRate pT dependence
21
Electron Medium+iso+BLayer ID: FakeRate MET dependence
22
Electron Medium++ ID(with new isolation): FakeRate pT dependence
23
Electron Medium++ ID(with new isolation): FakeRate MET dependence
Electron Medium++ ID(with old isolation): FakeRate pT dependence
Electron Medium++ ID(with old isolation): FakeRate MET dependence
26
WW selection exercise in 2011 data:Jet Multiplicities
27
WW selection exercise in 2011 data:Jet Multiplicities(with 30GeV pT Threshold)
28
ee channel: METrelTIGHT MEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
29
ee channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
30
ee channel: Di-lepton inv. mass
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
31
eµ channel: METrel
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
32
eµ channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHTMEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
33
Spare
34
eµ channel: Di-lepton inv. mass
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
35
All with bunch train pile-up MC10 samples with no reweighting applied
An impression of dramatic background enriching due to the medium+iso+Blayer for Electron ID mainly from Wjets, more intensive study needed to be done as soon as possible(Medium++? Need to be cross-checked with John Alison)
Accurate estimation needs to be done using data-driven(Wjets, DY background etc.)
Summary and Future work
36
µµ channel: METrel
TIGHTMEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
37
µµ channel: Di-lepton pT
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
38
µµ channel: Di-lepton inv. massTIGHT MEDIUM + ISO
+ BLAYER
11.6PB-1
35.2PB-1
TIGHT MEDIUM + ISO + BLAYER
39
Using New Medium+iso+Blayer Electron ID study presented by Jochen Hartert:
New Electron ID selection introduced recently(not optimized): egammaPID::ElectronMedium_WithTrackMatch
(*Note that: el_loose, el_medium, el_tight available for 2011 egamma D3PD) New Electron Isolation correction applied:
(OLD: etcone20_pt_corrected<4GeV, not in d3pd, need to be re-calculated) https://svnweb.cern.ch/trac/atlasusr/export/30076/mfiascar/WjetsD3PDskimming/trunk/IsoCorrectio
n.h
(NEW: caloIso98, using dedicated el_isIso mask (based on etcone30/ET, bin-by-bin tuned, flatter efficiency, better QCD rejection power)
egammaPID::TrackBlayer_Electron as Blayer requirement instead of simply NBLHits>0 if any hits are expected
Electron/Muon MC10 smearing applied(Job Running, ~100 MC samples!) Using the same random seeding policy for electron and muon:
Rndm_seed = 680049+EventNumber+index*100 Using ERescaler Tool for Electron smearing and refer to MCP release 16 smearing recommendation: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/MCPAnalysisGuidelinesRel16#AnchorResolutions
PileUp reweighting for mc10? Not yet, currently using non-pileup MC.o Different reweighting for e and µ, need to be discussed (mainly due to period difference)o Tested w/ and w/o rel15 reweighting, no dramatic impact!o Running on bunch train pile-up samples also, not yet finished https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/WZGroupInclusiveMeasurement
Not optimal especially for bunch train pile-up MC Negative Energy *full scaled* jets need to be cleaned
due to a D3PDmaker level bug. (Mainly in forward region?)
EtaOriginEM, PhiOriginEM, MOriginEM mostly(?) yield 0 in current MC samples as well as in 2011 data(?), should refer to the latest ATLAS Jet User guide so as to approximately recover them(the one on Jet/Etmiss twiki is obsolete!)