Ryan’s Landing Master Planned Development Application No. RZ-PUD-07-01.

Ryan’s Landing Ryan’s Landing Master Planned DevelopmentMaster Planned Development

Application No. RZ-PUD-07-01Application No. RZ-PUD-07-01

Location Location MapMap

Requested Action & Project HistoryRequested Action & Project History

March 6, 2006 – Application filed to rezone 27.7March 6, 2006 – Application filed to rezone 27.7++ ac. ac. Suburban Estate (EST-1) to Planned Unit Development Suburban Estate (EST-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow 69 s.f. units & 5 ac. Nature Park dedication.(PUD) to allow 69 s.f. units & 5 ac. Nature Park dedication.

Project before Local Planning Agency on July 19, 2006 – Project before Local Planning Agency on July 19, 2006 – as Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment from as Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment from ‘Greenbelt’ to ‘Residential’.‘Greenbelt’ to ‘Residential’.

City Council transmitted FLUM to Department of City Council transmitted FLUM to Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on August 15, 2006; second Community Affairs (DCA) on August 15, 2006; second reading of FLUM reading of FLUM pendingpending (what was action)? (what was action)?

FLUM denied by City Council on March 20, 2007.FLUM denied by City Council on March 20, 2007.

Developer & City engaged in pending litigation Developer & City engaged in pending litigation (when?)(when?)

Requested Action & Project HistoryRequested Action & Project History

(When?)(When?)Developer submitted alternative plan and filed new Developer submitted alternative plan and filed new applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning for approval of a 69-lot single-family residential rezoning for approval of a 69-lot single-family residential Master Planned Development (MPD).Master Planned Development (MPD).

City and Developer working to resolve and settle pending City and Developer working to resolve and settle pending lawsuit by considering a FLUM designation of ‘Residential’ lawsuit by considering a FLUM designation of ‘Residential’ for 22.7for 22.7± acres± acres; rezoning property to MPD District; final ; rezoning property to MPD District; final engineering plans; and final plat.engineering plans; and final plat.

Developer agrees to donate 5 acres of the 27.7Developer agrees to donate 5 acres of the 27.7± acres± acres to to City as a park site and meet certain Florida Green City as a park site and meet certain Florida Green Development Standards (FLUM designation of 5 acres to Development Standards (FLUM designation of 5 acres to remain ‘Greenbelt’).remain ‘Greenbelt’).

Existing Existing Future Future

Land UseLand Use

PROPOSEPROPOSED Future D Future Land UseLand Use

Conceptual Conceptual planplan

MPD Development StandardsMPD Development StandardsSingle Family Residential (SFR-1) DistrictSingle Family Residential (SFR-1) District

Maximum Number of Lots and DensityMaximum Number of Lots and Density 69 single family residential lots69 single family residential lots

Maximum DensityMaximum Density 2.46 units per acre (i.e. 69/27.79)2.46 units per acre (i.e. 69/27.79)

Minimum Lot SizeMinimum Lot Size 6,000 square feet6,000 square feet

Minimum Lot WidthMinimum Lot Width 50 feet (measured at front setback line)50 feet (measured at front setback line)

Minimum Living AreaMinimum Living Area 1,200 square feet1,200 square feet

Minimum Front Setback*Minimum Front Setback* 20 feet20 feet

Minimum Rear Setback*Minimum Rear Setback* 10 feet10 feet

Minimum Side Interior Setback*Minimum Side Interior Setback* 5 feet5 feet

Minimum Side Street Setback*Minimum Side Street Setback* 15 feet15 feet

Maximum impervious surface ratio (per lot)Maximum impervious surface ratio (per lot) 0.750.75

Maximum Building HeightMaximum Building Height 35 feet35 feet

*Setbacks measured from outer building wall, not eaves, to closest point of property lines.*Setbacks measured from outer building wall, not eaves, to closest point of property lines.

MPD InfrastructureMPD Infrastructure

Privately maintained stormwater and roads.Privately maintained stormwater and roads.

On-site detention (lake) outfall to Ryan Drive ditch via On-site detention (lake) outfall to Ryan Drive ditch via underground pipes constructed by Developer.underground pipes constructed by Developer.

Design and construction materials and methods to be Design and construction materials and methods to be approved by City.approved by City.

Project development in single phase. No concurrency Project development in single phase. No concurrency issues.issues.

Findings for MPD ApprovalFindings for MPD Approval

Consistent with Comprehensive Plan:Consistent with Comprehensive Plan:

Policy 1.1.2.2 - PUD densities generally compatible with assigned Policy 1.1.2.2 - PUD densities generally compatible with assigned zoning district.zoning district. Applicant proposes SFR-1 zoning district standards, Applicant proposes SFR-1 zoning district standards, compatible with ‘Residential’ FLUM designation.compatible with ‘Residential’ FLUM designation.

Policy 1.2.1.2 - Encourage development where infrastructure is Policy 1.2.1.2 - Encourage development where infrastructure is available.available. Infrastructure available; 5 ac. neighborhood park accessible Infrastructure available; 5 ac. neighborhood park accessible to all residents.to all residents.

Policy 1.2.1.4 - Leverage public resources.Policy 1.2.1.4 - Leverage public resources. Public/private Public/private partnership increases City’s park holdings without incurring land costs. partnership increases City’s park holdings without incurring land costs. Recreation impact fee credit to developer as part of MPD Agreement Recreation impact fee credit to developer as part of MPD Agreement prevents Developer from abandoning MPD Agreement and seeking prevents Developer from abandoning MPD Agreement and seeking Euclidian Zoning. Euclidian Zoning.

Findings for MPD Approval – Comprehensive Plan Findings for MPD Approval – Comprehensive Plan Consistency (continued)Consistency (continued)

Policy 3.3.4.2 – Neighborhood compatibility criteria applied to Policy 3.3.4.2 – Neighborhood compatibility criteria applied to development proposalsdevelopment proposals

10 to 50 ft. natural buffer on project perimeter adjacent to existing 10 to 50 ft. natural buffer on project perimeter adjacent to existing residences and road.residences and road.

Park located on exterior of project, maximizing visibility to greater Park located on exterior of project, maximizing visibility to greater number of existing residents.number of existing residents.

Open space created. Open space created.

Findings for MPD Approval – Comprehensive Plan Findings for MPD Approval – Comprehensive Plan Consistency (continued)Consistency (continued)

Policy 4.5.1.2 – The City shall develop recreational trails and/or Policy 4.5.1.2 – The City shall develop recreational trails and/or interpretive centers in parks with unique cultural, natural, historical or interpretive centers in parks with unique cultural, natural, historical or archeological resources. These facilities will provide learning archeological resources. These facilities will provide learning experiences for residents and be managed to promote eco-tourism.experiences for residents and be managed to promote eco-tourism.

Policy 5.5.2.2 – The City shall implement a recycling program complying Policy 5.5.2.2 – The City shall implement a recycling program complying with the requirements specified in Section 403.706(2), F.S.with the requirements specified in Section 403.706(2), F.S.

Policy 6.1.3.3 – The City shall consider alternate means and incentives to Policy 6.1.3.3 – The City shall consider alternate means and incentives to conserve water including, but not limited to, metered delivery limits on conserve water including, but not limited to, metered delivery limits on wells, irrigation meters, re-use of stormwater, and surface water pumps.wells, irrigation meters, re-use of stormwater, and surface water pumps.

Policy 6.1.9.4 – The City shall protect and maintain the unique Policy 6.1.9.4 – The City shall protect and maintain the unique environmental features, including native vegetative communities, in environmental features, including native vegetative communities, in designated passive City parks.designated passive City parks.

Findings for MPD Approval – Strategic Plan GoalsFindings for MPD Approval – Strategic Plan Goals

Goal 1 Objective 6 – Change user consumption patterns to Goal 1 Objective 6 – Change user consumption patterns to conserve water use.conserve water use.

Goal 4 Objective 2 – Maintain and enhance development Goal 4 Objective 2 – Maintain and enhance development standards.standards.

Goal 4 Objective 6 – Manage growth for quality, sustainable Goal 4 Objective 6 – Manage growth for quality, sustainable community with incorporating “green” development and community with incorporating “green” development and regulation.regulation.

Goal 4 Objective 8 – Expand Leisure and recreational amenities.Goal 4 Objective 8 – Expand Leisure and recreational amenities.

Findings for MPD Approval Findings for MPD Approval Sustainable Practices OverviewSustainable Practices Overview

The Applicant will seek Florida Green Building Coalition (FGBC) certification The Applicant will seek Florida Green Building Coalition (FGBC) certification for the development while adhering to numerous low impact design (green) for the development while adhering to numerous low impact design (green) strategies that complement the Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan strategies that complement the Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan Goals.Goals.

PUD improvement and action commitments reflect objectives sampled from PUD improvement and action commitments reflect objectives sampled from the FGBC Green Development Standard (Version 5.0 – January 2008).the FGBC Green Development Standard (Version 5.0 – January 2008).

Commitments focus on all six (6) categories of the Standard.Commitments focus on all six (6) categories of the Standard.1.1. Protect Ecosystems and Conserve Natural ResourcesProtect Ecosystems and Conserve Natural Resources

2.2. Create a Green Circulation SystemCreate a Green Circulation System

3.3. Green Utilities PracticesGreen Utilities Practices

4.4. AmenitiesAmenities

5.5. Covenants and Deed RestrictionsCovenants and Deed Restrictions

6.6. Provide Educational Information to Help Achieve and Promote Green Living Provide Educational Information to Help Achieve and Promote Green Living Practices.Practices.

Findings for MPD ApprovalFindings for MPD Approval Environmental or Natural Resource Impacts?Environmental or Natural Resource Impacts? FLUM analysis determined FLUM analysis determined

minimal impacts; MPD approval does not change finding.minimal impacts; MPD approval does not change finding.

Economic impact?Economic impact? Construction and land development related employment; Construction and land development related employment; Park reduces automobile dependency; Lot size provides alternative to Park reduces automobile dependency; Lot size provides alternative to existing.existing.

Government Services Impact?Government Services Impact? 69 additional units will have no appreciable 69 additional units will have no appreciable effect on services.effect on services.

Changed circumstances?Changed circumstances? Approval of the FLUM Amendment allows MPD Approval of the FLUM Amendment allows MPD providing mix of land uses and residential pattern lacking in the City.providing mix of land uses and residential pattern lacking in the City.

Mistake in original classification?Mistake in original classification? Change is result of FLUM Amendment. Change is result of FLUM Amendment.

Effect of change on area?Effect of change on area? Single family residential is compatible with the Single family residential is compatible with the surrounding area and the MPD provides a more contemporary development surrounding area and the MPD provides a more contemporary development pattern.pattern.

Health, safety, welfare, or morals impact?Health, safety, welfare, or morals impact? The rezoning of the site to The rezoning of the site to MPD is seen as having neither a positive or negative impact on the overall MPD is seen as having neither a positive or negative impact on the overall welfare of the general public. welfare of the general public.