May 20 , 2014 Project Update Project Update Implemented By Financed By Supported By May 20 , 2014
Apr 13, 2017
Project Information – UDDIPAN• As Per PD Commencement: 15 September 2011• Actual Commencement : January 2012• Project Location:• Area : 04 ( Daudkandi, Kachua, Comilla & Mirpur)• District: 03(Dhaka,Comilla & Chandpur)• Upazila & Thana: 05 ( Daudkandi, Kachua –Rural• Mirpur & Sha Ali of DCC (North)
& Kotwali of CCC• Union: 16 (8 from Daudkandi & 8 from Kachua)• Urban Ward: 04 (2 from DCC & 2 from CCC)• Controlled Area: 06 ( Kachua-2 Daudkandi-2,DCC-1 & CCC-1)
2
• As Per PD Commencement: 15 September 2011• Actual Commencement : January 2012• Project Location:• Area : 04 ( Daudkandi, Kachua, Comilla & Mirpur)• District: 03(Dhaka,Comilla & Chandpur)• Upazila & Thana: 05 ( Daudkandi, Kachua –Rural• Mirpur & Sha Ali of DCC (North)
& Kotwali of CCC• Union: 16 (8 from Daudkandi & 8 from Kachua)• Urban Ward: 04 (2 from DCC & 2 from CCC)• Controlled Area: 06 ( Kachua-2 Daudkandi-2,DCC-1 & CCC-1)
Staff Position
01-Project Coordinator = 0101. Trainer=0103. Accountant= 0104. Documentation &Communication Officer=0104. Area Coordinator= 0405. Office Assistant= 0105. Field Facilitators= 20
Total= 29Now we have 24 staffs. 5 FFs positionsare blank after vacant the positions.
01-Project Coordinator = 0101. Trainer=0103. Accountant= 0104. Documentation &Communication Officer=0104. Area Coordinator= 0405. Office Assistant= 0105. Field Facilitators= 20
Total= 29Now we have 24 staffs. 5 FFs positionsare blank after vacant the positions.
Stakeholders Coverage
2100
68 30920
0
8400 16000 62 460 40 180 100 200
5
68 30920 8400 16000 75 460 40 180 100 200
Major Achievement in Activities-October 2014- April 2014
Timeframe Targetactivities
Achievement %
6
Targetactivities
October 13 - April 14 771 645 84
LGI (Rural)Total- 430
Supports- VGD, VGF,Widow & Oldage allowance, Cow, Goat, Stipend,
Birth Registration,
LGI (Urban)Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
LGI (Urban)Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
NSATotal- 1053
Supports- Computer training, MicroCredit, NFPE, Stipend, Birth
Registration
LGI (Urban)Total- 26
Supports- Birth Registration,
NSA ( Urban)Total- 35
Supports-Stipend, NFPE, BirthRegistration, micro credit
NSA ( Urban)Total- 35
Supports-Stipend, NFPE, BirthRegistration, micro credit
7
_ Organized a press briefing and ID cards distribution ceremony on 28January 2014 at Baropara union Parishad premises, Daudkandi ofComilla district. Chief guest was Mr. Anwarul Islam Sikder, AdditionalSecretary and Administrator, DNCC. Ms. Birgit Lundback , DirectorCRG and Mr. Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager of SCI were also attendedas special guest. Presided over by Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN.
_ Organized a press briefing and ID cards distribution ceremony on 28January 2014 at Baropara union Parishad premises, Daudkandi ofComilla district. Chief guest was Mr. Anwarul Islam Sikder, AdditionalSecretary and Administrator, DNCC. Ms. Birgit Lundback , DirectorCRG and Mr. Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager of SCI were also attendedas special guest. Presided over by Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN.
8
EU Delegation visit
EU Delegation Ms. Julia Jacoby along withMr.
Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN, Ms.Birgit Lundback , Director, CRG, SCI, Mr.Shamsul Alom Bokul, Deputy Director, CRG, Mr.Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager, CRG of Savethe Children visited Mirpur slum areas andMirpur model thana on 30 January, 2014.
10
EU Delegation Ms. Julia Jacoby along withMr.
Md. Emranul Huq Chowdhury, ED,UDDIPAN, Ms.Birgit Lundback , Director, CRG, SCI, Mr.Shamsul Alom Bokul, Deputy Director, CRG, Mr.Idris Ali Khan , Senior Manager, CRG of Savethe Children visited Mirpur slum areas andMirpur model thana on 30 January, 2014.
Received & distributed – 6686 cards ( Daudkandi & Kachua)
Identity Card distributionIdentity Card distribution
17
Male :481Female:540Total: 1021
Male :481Female:540Total: 1021
Male : 268Female: 302Total: 570
Male : 268Female: 302Total: 570
Comilla CC Mirpur
Daudkandi Kachua
Male : 4808Female: 5037Total: 9845
Male : 4808Female: 5037Total: 9845
Male ; 4600Female; 4629Total: 9229
Male ; 4600Female; 4629Total: 9229
18
4808
4600
5037
4629
3000
4000
5000
6000
481 268
540302
0
1000
2000
3000
Comilla Daudkandi Kachua Mirpur
Male
Female
19
20000
25000
30000
35000
20431
30920
Registration Target and Achievement
40%
%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Achieved Target2
60% Target
Achieved
• LGIs & members of Law Enforcement Agency are proactive iffacilitate any development endeavor positively and interactively.
• Anybody else like to initiate any development initiative for the sakeof children , only need proper facilitation with them.
• People have keen interest to know information on any developmentefforts and act in accordance with it.
• To sustain any development efforts need to keep continuingmonitoring and surveillance is necessary.
• All development initiatives should have government's supports.
22
• LGIs & members of Law Enforcement Agency are proactive iffacilitate any development endeavor positively and interactively.
• Anybody else like to initiate any development initiative for the sakeof children , only need proper facilitation with them.
• People have keen interest to know information on any developmentefforts and act in accordance with it.
• To sustain any development efforts need to keep continuingmonitoring and surveillance is necessary.
• All development initiatives should have government's supports.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some timemaking difficulties-Collecting proper address of place of origin is makingcomplications-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete-Correct spelling of places-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t liketo give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some timemaking difficulties-Collecting proper address of place of origin is makingcomplications-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete-Correct spelling of places-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t liketo give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some timemaking difficulties-Collecting proper address of place of origin is makingcomplications-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete-Correct spelling of places-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t liketo give time in this regard.
-Slow Internet connectivity and access to internet some timemaking difficulties-Collecting proper address of place of origin is makingcomplications-BR cards information is mostly misspelled or incomplete-Correct spelling of places-Most migrant children can’t say their information appropriately.-Most LGI members have no computer literacy and also don’t liketo give time in this regard.
23
Sharing on Results of Rapid Assessment on Vulnerable Children atRisk for Unsafe Migration and Migrant
Sharing on Results of Rapid Assessment on Vulnerable Children atRisk for Unsafe Migration and Migrant
Implemented ByFinanced By Supported By
Methodology
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafemigration after initiating registration system for keep them under theintensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many childrenshould be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children fromthis list through random sampling basis. A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.Used a format with regards to this Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward An informal interview with each children and parents was held forcollecting required data.Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard corepoor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition04. most of them have no own land for cultivation05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafemigration after initiating registration system for keep them under theintensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many childrenshould be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children fromthis list through random sampling basis. A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.Used a format with regards to this Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward An informal interview with each children and parents was held forcollecting required data.Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard corepoor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition04. most of them have no own land for cultivation05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafemigration after initiating registration system for keep them under theintensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many childrenshould be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children fromthis list through random sampling basis. A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.Used a format with regards to this Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward An informal interview with each children and parents was held forcollecting required data.Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard corepoor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition04. most of them have no own land for cultivation05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
UDDIPAN has been listed some most vulnerable children at risk for unsafemigration after initiating registration system for keep them under theintensive surveillance. Although we have no target to how many childrenshould be listed as vulnerable children. We basically selected children fromthis list through random sampling basis. A total of 402 samplings selected for acquiring data.Used a format with regards to this Collected 20 sample from each Union Parishad(UP) and Ward An informal interview with each children and parents was held forcollecting required data.Criteria of selecting vulnerable are ; 01. Children living with a hard corepoor family 02. Migrated alone 03. They are living hand to mouth condition04. most of them have no own land for cultivation05. Who were not access in service provided by government, LGIs and NSAs06. Most of the children had no access to education 07. Involved in labor etc
300350400450
266
402
Total and category wise respondentslink before reg
Link after reg
Yet to link
Total
050
100150200250300
Link before reg Link after reg Yet to link Total
12412
250
300
350
204198
322
80
Respondents Information : Gender segregation & No of respondents atsource and destination area
Male
0
50
100
150
200
MaleFemale Rural
Urban
80Female
Rural
Urban
51%49%
Gender Segregation by %
80%
20%
Rural Urban respondents segregationby %
Male
FemaleRural
Urban
31%
3%
Percentage of Linkage scenario
Link before reg
66%
Link before reg
Link after reg
Yet to link
Major Services received at Rural & Urban Areas
Rural Area (BeforeRegistration)
VGD,VGF,
Widow Allowance,Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,Food for
works, sanitation etc
Rural Area (BeforeRegistration)
VGD,VGF,
Widow Allowance,Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,Food for
works, sanitation etc
Urban Area(Before)
Health cardBirth registration
EducationSanitation
Urban Area(Before)
Health cardBirth registration
EducationSanitation
Rural Area (AfterRegistration)
NFPE EnrollmentStipend
Small Loan (Kachua)Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Rural Area (AfterRegistration)
NFPE EnrollmentStipend
Small Loan (Kachua)Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Urban Area(After)
Health cardBirth registration
Educationstipend
Sanitation
Urban Area(After)
Health cardBirth registration
Educationstipend
Sanitation
Rural Area (BeforeRegistration)
VGD,VGF,
Widow Allowance,Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,Food for
works, sanitation etc
Rural Area (BeforeRegistration)
VGD,VGF,
Widow Allowance,Old Age Allowance,
Cow-goat,Food for
works, sanitation etc
Urban Area(Before)
Health cardBirth registration
EducationSanitation
Urban Area(Before)
Health cardBirth registration
EducationSanitation
Rural Area (AfterRegistration)
NFPE EnrollmentStipend
Small Loan (Kachua)Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Rural Area (AfterRegistration)
NFPE EnrollmentStipend
Small Loan (Kachua)Widow allowance
Small loan(Kachua)Sanitation (Kachua)
etc
Urban Area(After)
Health cardBirth registration
Educationstipend
Sanitation
Urban Area(After)
Health cardBirth registration
Educationstipend
Sanitation
Trend analysis area wise
81
76
128
80
100
120
140
Link Before Reg.Link After Reg.Migrated before Reg.Migrated After reg.
81
29
6 8
28 3420
0 0 01 5
0 00
20
40
60
Daudkandi Kachua Mirpur Comilla
206
Migrated before and after registration in numbers
Before Reg.
After Reg.
Total at risk & migrantchildren
402
Updated current addressScenario of Migrated & Updated address
5% 1%
% of migrated Children
100%
100%
2626
Migrated
Updatedadress
94%Total
Updated BeforeRegAfter Reg
Migrant Children
4%
By %
No
Reintegration
Migrant Children
80
3
77
Total Urban ChildrenCame aloneCame with family
96%Came alone
With family
Major Findings
Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk forunsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among theregistered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only. Migration before registration is 5.22 % Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%. The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%. In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed. The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family. Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk forunsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among theregistered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only. Migration before registration is 5.22 % Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%. The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%. In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed. The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family. Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk forunsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among theregistered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only. Migration before registration is 5.22 % Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%. The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%. In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed. The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family. Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.
Linkage after registration is significant among the vulnerable children at risk forunsafe migration and migrated children. The percentage is 66% among theregistered children. Yet to link is only 3%. Linked before registration is 31%.
Migration after registration is very few in number. Which is 1.24 % only. Migration before registration is 5.22 % Among the respondents 51 % are male children and 49 are female children and
rural urban segregation is Rural 80% and Urban is 20%. The scenario of migration is shown that only 5% children migrate before
registration but after registration this trend reduced up to 1%. In terms of updating data during or after migration is very optimistic as this is
100% completed. The data on migrant children is showing that among the respondents only 4%
children came alone at city while 96% came with their family. Reintegration scenario is not optimistic up to now. But we do expect the scenario
will change positively in coming future.