CIMT 1 Running head: CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY The Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Quality of Life among Persons with Chronic Hemiparesis Ashley Morrow, Elizabeth Ballor, Jill Killingbeck, and Megan Haskin Saginaw Valley State University
38
Embed
Running head: CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPYsvsu.edu/library/archives/public/MSOT/documents/CIMTqol.pdf · CIMT 3 The Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Modified
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CIMT 1
Running head: CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY
The Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Modified Constraint-Induced
Movement Therapy on Quality of Life among Persons with Chronic Hemiparesis
Ashley Morrow, Elizabeth Ballor, Jill Killingbeck, and Megan Haskin
Saginaw Valley State University
CIMT 2
Abstract
Purpose: This study examined the effects of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and
modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on quality of life among persons
demonstrating learned nonuse of an affected upper extremity status post CVA.
Method: A mixed methods approach, consisting of both qualitative and quantitative
methodology, was used to examine the impact of CIMT and mCIMT on quality of life for
persons demonstrating upper extremity learned nonuse following a CVA.
Results: The Stroke Impact Scale showed improvement in all areas of quality of life in both
CIMT and mCIMT groups. However, the CIMT group showed greater gains than the mCIMT
group over the assessment areas.
Conclusion: The data collected suggested that both CIMT and mCIMT can produce increased
overall gains in quality of life among persons demonstrating learned nonuse of an affected upper
extremity status post CVA.
CIMT 3
The Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Modified Constraint-Induced
Movement Therapy on Quality of Life Among Persons with Chronic Hemiparesis
Cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs), otherwise known as strokes, account for nearly
780,000 deaths annually in the United States. A CVA occurs as a result of the blood and oxygen
supply to the brain becoming disrupted, causing an insufficient amount of nutrients to reach the
brain. CVAs are the third most common cause of death, and impact the lives of Americans every
40 seconds in the United States. CVAs are also the leading cause of long-term disability among
Americans (“Stroke Statistics,” 2008).
Hemiparesis, or weakness on one side of the body, is one deficit that may be experienced
by individuals who have sustained CVAs. Learned non-use is a common condition that often
arises when hemiparesis is present, as an individual begins to rely on his or her unaffected side to
compensate for weakness to the contralateral side. Learned non-use or inactivity of the affected
side may further contribute to disability and hinder occupational performance in areas of daily
life activities and experienced quality of life (Wu et al., 2007).
Quality of life has been identified as a problem for many people post-stroke. As
discussed by King (1996), there is a need to assist stroke survivors in coping with the effects of
stroke. In a study examining quality of life, 30 percent of the 86 participants were measured to be
within a depressed range. Within the four domains examined, the quality of life of stroke
survivors was measured as lowest in health and functioning. Objectives such as participation in
leisure recreations, usefulness to others, and general mobility were some of the areas most
affected by stoke observed in this study (King, 1996).
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a promising approach for the treatment
of hemiparesis and learned non-use following a CVA. CIMT involves forcing the use of the
CIMT 4
affected limb in order to improve function of a partially paralyzed upper extremity in clients who
have experienced a stroke. The unaffected limb is immobilized by a constraint as a part of an
intense treatment protocol that involves therapy for six hours a day for two weeks, as well as in a
home program, with a goal of forcing movement of the affected extremity (Caimmi et al., 2008).
A modified version of this protocol, called modified constraint-induced movement therapy
(mCIMT), involves constraint of the unaffected extremity for three hours per day, five days per
week, for a total of four weeks. A home program is also included with this protocol (Earley,
2008).
Research Problem
Limited research has been completed to examine the effects of CIMT/mCIMT on quality
of life post-stoke. For example, Dettmers and colleagues found in a study of 11 participants, that
some aspects including quality of life were improved after completing a modified CIMT
program (Dettmers et al., 2005). However, there is an overall lack of literature discussing the
effectiveness of CIMT/mCIMT on the improvement of quality of life. Yet it appears that, due to
its reputation as having a positive impact on individuals with chronic hemiparesis and learned
non-use, CIMT and mCIMT may have a positive effect on the quality of life for those who are
post stroke (Jamison & Orchaniam, 2007).
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this two-phase, sequential, mixed methods research study was to examine
the effects of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and modified constraint-induced
movement therapy (mCIMT). This study focused on the effects of the programs on the quality of
life of persons who had sustained a stroke and who demonstrated learned nonuse of the affected
upper extremity.
CIMT 5
Research Questions and Hypotheses
The first two research questions were answered through the use of quantitative data
collected through the Stroke Impact Scale.
1) Does participation in mCIMT improve the quality of life for clients who have
experienced chronic hemiparesis status post CVA?
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the pre- to post-intervention Stroke Impact
Scale Version 3.0 scores among participants involved in a mCIMT program.
HO: µ1 = µ2, where
µ1 = Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 pretest scores
µ2 = Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 posttest scores
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the pre- to post-intervention Stroke
Impact Scale Version 3.0 scores among participants involved in a mCIMT program.
HA: µ1 ≠ µ2
2) Does participation in CIMT improve the quality of life for clients who have experienced
chronic hemiparesis status post CVA?
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the pre- to post-intervention Stroke Impact
Scale Version 3.0 scores among participants involved in a CIMT program.
HO: µ1 = µ2, where
µ1 = Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 pretest scores
µ2 = Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 posttest scores
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the pre- to post-intervention Stroke
Impact Scale Version 3.0 scores among participants involved in a CIMT program.
HA: µ1 ≠ µ2
CIMT 6
The final two research questions were answered through the use of qualitative data
collected through post treatment focus groups.
3) Does participation in mCIMT/CIMT improve the occupational performance of clients
who have experienced chronic hemiparesis status post CVA?
4) Does participation in mCIMT/CIMT improve the client’s perceived quality of life status
post CVA?
Definition of Terms
Brain plasticity. Brain plasticity is the capability of the brain to compensate for loss of
function due to a possible disruption of neuronal organization or damage to the brain (Kolb &
Whishaw, 2003).
Cerebral vascular accident. A cerebral vascular accident, or stroke, is a disorder of the
blood vessels within the brain that is the result of an interrupted blood flow. Disruptions of the
blood and nutrient supply to the brain will cause subsequent neuronal death to the brain vessels,
and cause neurological symptoms (Eckert, 2007).
Constraint induced movement therapy. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) is
a treatment program that is implemented by forcing the use of the affected limb in order to
improve function of a partially paralyzed upper extremity among clients who have experienced a
stroke (Caimmi et al., 2008).
Hemiparesis. Hemiparesis is weakness or partial paralysis affecting one side of the body.
It is frequently caused by a cerebral vascular accident, or brain lesion. Paresis typically occurs on
the side of the body opposite to the lesion, due to the decussating or crossing of the motor tracts
of the brain (Eckert, 2007).
CIMT 7
Learned non-use. Learned non-use is a condition that often results from the consequences
of a stroke. This condition leads to the discontinuation of the client’s use of his/her affected
extremity for daily life tasks due to sustained cortical disorganization. Permanent disability or
dependency may result after continued disuse of an affected extremity, which can decrease
occupational performance (Wu et al., 2007).
Modified constraint-induced movement therapy. Modified constraint induced movement
therapy (mCIMT) is a treatment protocol in which the duration and amount of therapy or the
constraint regimen differs from original CIMT program (Hakkennes & Keating, 2005).
Treatment is implemented by forcing the use of the affected limb in order to improve function of
a partially paralyzed upper extremity among clients who have experienced a stroke (Caimmi et
al., 2008).
Occupational performance. Occupational performance is the act of being able to
complete or participate in activities that are necessary for an individual to survive. These include
any activity that an individual completes on a daily basis. Occupational performance allows the
individual to learn and adapt to the environment and activities (Hansen, Dirette, & Atchison,
2007).
Quality of life. Quality of life is an individual’s global feelings of well-being and
satisfaction within the cultural context and value system within which one resides (Campos &
Johnson, 1990). For the purposes of this study, quality of life will be measured using the Stroke
Impact Scale. This scale assesses how a stroke has affected an individual’s health and daily
living.
CIMT 8
Significance of the Study
The study explored whether mCIMT/CIMT had an effect on the quality of life and
occupational performance of clients who were post stroke. The results of this study showed that
the use of the mCIMT/CIMT program improved the participant’s occupational functioning and
quality of life after sustaining a stroke. The data obtained from this study also contributed to the
body of knowledge concerning mCIMT/CIMT, and also supports the existing studies that
suggest the use of mCIMT/CIMT for rehabilitation in clinical settings to address deficits in
quality of performance in occupations and quality of life post stroke.
Review of the Literature
Recently, there has been an increased amount of well-designed research studies that have
investigated the therapeutic benefits of mCIMT/CIMT on physical functioning post-CVA.
However, quality of life among stroke survivors who have received mCIMT/CIMT has yet to be
thoroughly examined. This review will provide an overview of the existing literature related to
mCIMT/CIMT and quality of life of individuals post stroke. First, the literature review will
discuss hemiparesis and its impact on learned non-use on the affected extremity. Second, the
review will address the origins of CIMT in early CVA rehabilitation, and the gains achieved
through the use this approach to treatment. Finally, neuroplasticity will be discussed and the
implications of cortical reorganization on improved brain recovery in chronic stroke patients.
Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT)
Constraint-induced movement therapy and modified constraint-induced movement
therapy are rehabilitative treatment techniques that are used to improve the quality of function of
an affected limb experiencing hemiparesis. Strokes may result in hemiparesis, which causes
weakness on one side of the body. Strokes are an increasingly common health problem in the
CIMT 9
United States, with four million Americans struggling daily with the effects of a stroke. Strokes
are the leading cause of sensorimotor disability in the United States (“Stroke Statistics,” 2008).
However, upper extremity (UE) function, which can be negatively affected by a stroke, is
needed to complete activities of daily living, improve independence, and maintain a high quality
of life (Hakkennes & Keating, 2005).
Learned nonuse
CIMT and mCIMT are therapeutic interventions that aim to restore upper extremity
functioning that has been lost secondary to learned nonuse (Wolf et al., 2006). Learned nonuse
is a phenomenon in which stroke survivors stop using their affected extremities, despite the
presence of intact motor ability in the affected extremity. Early research conducted by Taub in
the Silver Springs Monkey Experiment provided the first information regarding this
phenomenon. During the Silver Springs experiment, sensation in one of the monkeys’ arms was
taken away, but the motor ability was left intact (a process known as deafferentiation). Taub
observed that, not long after sensation was taken away from the arm, the monkeys stopped using
their affected arms, even though motor ability was present. The monkeys relied solely on their
non-affected arm to perform within their environment. However, when Taub applied a
constraint to the non-affected arm of the monkeys, and forced them to use their affected arms,
functional use of the affected arm was gradually restored (Taub et al., 1999).
The information learned from the Silver Springs experiment was later applied to research
with humans who had sustained strokes and subsequently demonstrated learned nonuse. CIMT
was first used on patients who were status post CVA by Taub in 1980. Taub’s treatment
protocol required clients to have their unaffected limb restrained for 90% of their waking hours
for two weeks, and participate in exercise training for six hours a day (Hakkennes & Keating,
CIMT 10
2005). Taub found that individuals with weakness of one side of the body (hemiparesis) could
benefit from CIMT (Taub et. al., 1999).
Therapeutic protocols
Taub’s therapy has since evolved since the early research with monkeys, and today there
are two main types of CIMT used in the rehabilitation of persons with upper extremity
hemiparesis status post CVA. Both CIMT and mCIMT involve constraining the unaffected limb,
in efforts to force the affected arm to regain movement through participation functional
movement. The CIMT constraint is worn for six hours a day, for five days a week, for a total of
two complete weeks. The mCIMT protocol involves wearing a constraint on the unaffected
extremity for three hours a day, five days a week for four total weeks of constraint wear (Taub et.
al., 1999).
CIMT/mCIMT techniques include restricting the unaffected limb for a sustained period
of time and encouraging client participation in exercises that are task-specific, to retrain the
affected limb to do functional daily activities. CIMT/mCIMT therapy exercises consist of
participation in activities requiring functional movement patterns including grasping, pinching,
reaching, lifting, and placing. The participant completes these tasks in a repetitive fashion.
Repetitive practice and shaping are used to retrain the brain and rebuild the neuropathways that
were damaged as a result of the stroke. Repetitive practice of specific tasks may encourage motor
planning and experience-related adaptations. Daily tasks are also integrated into the therapeutic
protocol to increase strength, range of motion, and muscle tone in the affected upper extremity
(Boake et al., 2007).
Blanton and Wolf (1999) discussed the success of CIMT in terms of restoring upper
extremity function 3 to 9 months post CVA, compared to traditional stroke rehabilitation. The
CIMT 11
researchers noted that the benefits of restricting the unaffected arm remained after the constraint
was removed. Their research showed that learned non-use does exist, and when an individual is
forced to use their affected arm, the phenomenon can be reversed. With the help of an intense
CIMT protocol, learned non-use can be overcome and clients can regain some function and
movement in their affected limb.
Neuroplasticity
When learned non-use occurs, the individual compensates for the lack of movement from
the affected extremity, making the non-affected extremity more dominant. Individuals acquire
non-use when they attempt to use their affected limb in an activity and fail at the task, after
sustaining an injury. Unfortunately, individuals who do not use or ignore one side of the body are
limiting their freedom and independence, and decreasing their quality of life (Bonifer, Anderson,
& Arciniegas, 2005).
The idea of neuroplasticity has been used to explain the effects of repetitive, forced use
on upper extremity function post brain insult. Neuroplasticity is the brain’s ability to reorganize
itself in efforts to compensate for loss of function due to damage to one area of the brain.
Research conducted by Dombovy (2004) demonstrated that repetitive use of an involved
extremity is key to optimal brain reorganization status post CVA. According the neuroplasticity
theory, the structures of the brain lying adjacent to the area where the damage (infarct) occurred,
will reorganize and function for that area. CIMT and mCIMT have indeed been shown to
produce both clinical improvement and cortical reorganization in chronic stroke patients.
Furthermore, early forced arm use or exercise of the affected extremity post CVA has been
shown to stop cell loss and disuse that will lead to degeneration (Kleim, Jones, & Schallert,
2003).
CIMT 12
Outcome Potential
Hakkennes and Keating (2005) completed a metaanalysis of a number of trials that
examined the effectiveness of CIMT compared to other rehabilitative techniques in the areas of
quality of life, patient satisfaction, health care costs, and improved function. Overall, it appears
that CIMT benefits those who comply with the strict protocol and commit themselves fully to the
program. According to Wolf et al. (2006), in the EXCITE randomized clinical trial, CIMT
participants showed statistically significant improvements of upper extremity function in
comparison to participants receiving traditional therapy. The results of this study, which
included 222 participants within seven clinical sites, were that arm mobility increased
significantly and lasted for more than a year.
According to Ching-yi, Chia-ling, Wen-chung, and Keh-chung (2007), learned non-use
may also occur if patients are advised by others to rely on their unaffected arm to complete tasks,
to avoid becoming frustrated with attempts to use their affected side. CIMT can be implemented
with those who have experienced a stroke and have hemiparesis, to reverse the debilitation of
learned non-use. Through consistent constraint wear, the individual will begin to relearn that it
is possible to use the affected arm in daily tasks (Hakkennes & Keating, 2005).
Quality of Life
Quality of life may be simply described as a person’s individual perception and feelings
of overall enjoyment and satisfaction with life. Quality of life after a stroke is evaluated by
looking at various factors. Age, gender, the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL),
level of disability, support of friends and family, the presence of depression, and living
arrangements can all have a significant impact on the level of quality of life post stroke (Nichols-
Larsen, Clark, Zeringue, Greenspan, & Blanton, 2005). Quality of life is an important factor to
CIMT 13
consider when investigating the effects of a stroke and outcomes of stroke rehabilitation.
Feelings of well-being are important in order to promote the continuation of positive healthcare
outcomes throughout rehabilitation and after. However, despite the importance of quality of life
at this time, there has been limited research exploring the impacts of various approaches to stroke
rehabilitation on quality of life (Carod-Artal, Egido, Gonza´lez, & de Seijas, 2000).
Carod-Artal et al. (2000) have suggested that four areas of health (physical, psychosocial,
functional, and social) must be explored in the assessment of post-stroke quality of life. Physical
health includes any physical symptoms experienced as a result of disease. Psychological health
is described as functioning within the emotional and cognitive domains. Functional health refers
to independent living capabilities, such as care of self, mobility and successful role opportunities
and fulfillment. Social health includes the presence and amount of support available through
family, friends, and the community.
Measuring Quality of Life Post-CVA
As reported by Carod-Artal et al. (2000), quality of life is difficult to consistently
measure, specifically in regards to a cerebral vascular accident, due to problems with construct
validity. The quality of life an individual reports is based on his/her own perception, and may
vary greatly when compared from person to person. In addition, it is difficult to compare
statistics or opinions taken from patients who have variability in the effects of their condition,
and treatment programs received (such as programs at general rehabilitation centers versus
specialized stroke rehabilitation centers). Despite these issues, it is vital that therapists attempt to
provide treatment that may address quality of life, and help promote functioning at the highest
level possible, to ensure positive results are maintained and continued after the rehabilitation
program has ceased (Carod-Artal et al.). However, there is minimal research exploring this
CIMT 14
aspect of functioning after a CVA, or how specific types of treatment interventions affect quality
of life (Hakkennes & Keating, 2005).
The quality of life of an individual may be compromised as a result of a stroke.
Immediate changes in function that occur after a stroke may lead a person to believe that he/she
may never use his/her extremities to their full potential again. Learned non-use occurs as a result
of compensating for hemiparesis. CIMT forces an individual to overcome learned non-use by
using the affected limb as the primary limb in activities of daily living.
CIMT has been gaining in popularity due to its consistent effectiveness in remediating
deficits in upper extremity function resulting from CVA. However, there is very little research
available on the effects of CIMT on quality of life. Yet, the success of CIMT and mCIMT on
individuals post stroke in other areas of function, such as improved performance and use of the
affected limb after participating in such a program, provides reason to believe that quality of life
may be a targeted outcome to be improved through mCIMT/CIMT as well. Restoration of upper
extremity function may lead to improved participation, promoting an increase in the perception
of quality of life.
Method
Research Design
A mixed methods approach, consisting of qualitative and quantitative methodology, was
used in this study. The quantitative portion of the study involved use of a quasi-experimental,
nonequivalent, two-group pretest-posttest design (as described in Portney & Watkins, 2008).
Qualitative data was collected via client journaling and a post-treatment focus group. Together,
these approaches allowed the researchers to examine the effects of CIMT and mCIMT on quality
of life. Treatment groups were determined via participants’ stated preference (CIMT vs. mCIMT
CIMT 15
protocol), as well as participants’ individual capabilities and therapeutic tolerance for the
requirements of each protocol.
Participants
In order to participate in this study, participants were required to meet specific criteria for
CIMT, as outlined by Blanton and Wolf (1999). These criteria included the ability to complete a
specific set of active movements with the affected arm. These movements included: 45-90
degrees of shoulder flexion and abduction; 45 degrees of external rotation at the shoulder;
minimal active elbow extension; 45 degrees of forearm supination and pronation; at least five
degrees of wrist extension; and five degrees of active digital extension (specifically in the thumb,
index, and middle fingers). Each participant was also required to be able to grasp and release a
washcloth three times within one minute (Blanton & Wolf).
Exclusion criteria included the presence of any prior medical issues that could potentially
interfere with CIMT/mCIMT treatment, such as recent myocardial infarction, seizures, severe
osteoporosis, or any condition that a referring physician may have considered to be dangerous
for participants’ health. Shoulder pain (such as rotator cuff pain, bursitis, or tendonitis), with the
exception of arthritis, was also an exclusionary criterion. In addition, that participants had to be
six months or more post-stroke at initial evaluation, able to understand verbal and written
instructions, and have satisfactory activity tolerance. Potential clients also needed to have
enough strength and endurance to complete each day’s therapeutic interventions, and be able to
participate in the pre and post-test assessments and reassessments. The participants were also
required commit to the two or four week program and adhere to the strict protocol.
Ten participants were selected from a convenience sample of people who responded to
advertisements for the study. The sample was split into two treatment groups, with four
CIMT 16
participants in each based on client preference, individual capabilities, and therapeutic tolerance
for each protocol. Although ten participants began the study, eight participants followed
protocol and completed the program.
Instrumentation
The Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 was used to gather quantitative data regarding
participants’ quality of life in the areas of physical, mental, social, and emotional functioning.
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a 60-item self report that takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes
to complete. It evaluates eight domains of functioning believed to impact an individual’s quality
of life: strength, mobility, hand function, ADLs and IADLs, memory and thinking, emotion,
communication, and social participation. Clients rate how their stroke has affected each domain,
on a Lickert scale. The SIS also contains a final question that asks clients to rate their perception
of overall recovery, from 0 (no recovery) to 100 (full recovery) (Carod-Artal et al., 2008).
The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 has been previously evaluated for validity and reliability. It
was found to have satisfactory internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and adequate convergent
validity. Thus, the Stroke Impact Scale has been deemed a valid tool to assess the quality of life
of stroke patients (Carod-Artal et al., 2008).
In the present study, qualitative data was collected throughout the program via progress
notes and journals, as well as at the end of the program through the use of a focus group. Overall
satisfaction with the CIMT/mCIMT program was determined from the clients’ feedback
recorded in progress notes and how well they use their affected arm in daily occupations after
participating in the program.
Questions asked during the focus group were designed to facilitate communication
between participants and to allow the participants to verbalize their perceptions regarding quality
CIMT 17
of life following a stroke. The questions focused on participants’ thoughts regarding the
CIMT/mCIMT program and protocol, and quality of life before and after participation in the
program. Follow-up interviews with four participants were also carried out in the fall of 2009,
three-month post-treatment. The purpose of the interviews was to evaluate the long-term effects
of CIMT/mCIMT on the involved participants.
Procedures
Study site. The study was completed on the campus of a public medium-sized university
in the Midwestern United States. All treatment was provided in a group setting. However, all
participants worked individually with occupational therapy graduate students with advanced
training in CIMT/mCIMT, under the supervision of at least one professor who was a registered
occupational therapist (OTR). The student therapist to participant ratio was 1:1 or 2:1. The
study was approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board prior to implementation.
Data collection. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 was administered pre and post treatment
within the treatment facility. Participants were instructed to complete the scale independently or
with assistance from family or caregivers. Assistance from the student therapist was provided if
necessary for correct completion of the assessment.
Researchers also took notes of progress or decline of individual participants throughout
the completion of various exercises and activities, in order to effectively document responses for
qualitative data collection. Additional data regarding the participants’ perception of themselves
throughout the program was collected from several different sources to establish themes and
enable the participants to be active members of the intervention process. The clients were given
journals to log their experiences of the CIMT/mCIMT program and to reflect on mini-milestones
CIMT 18
achieved. They were encouraged to reflect upon their daily journal entries with their student
therapist.
Two focus groups were also conducted to allow the participants to share how
CIMT/mCIMT treatment affected their perceived level of function. The first focus group took
place two weeks into treatment, and included all participants. The second one took place four
weeks post treatment on the final day of assessment; it included only the mCIMT participants.
Researchers took notes during the focus groups, noting clients’ feelings of satisfaction about the
program, as well as any issues or concerns that participants may have had regarding the
treatment. Questions focused on changes in occupational performance or quality of life
experienced by participants from pre to post intervention. Both focus groups were digitally
recorded.
Intervention. During activities, each participant wore a mitt on the unaffected upper
extremity to force the use of the affected upper extremity. Mitts were fabricated with cotton and
netting to provide comfort and breathability for each client; the hand and wrist were kept in a
neutral position during activities. The mitt served as a physical barrier and reminder to refrain
from using unaffected upper extremity.
Activities that the clients participated in were based on theories concerning shaping and
repetition, with the overall goal being the reduction of the learned nonuse phenomenon that
typically occurs with hemiplegia (Wolf et al., 2006). The participants completed many
shaping/adaptive activities involving preparatory methods and purposeful activities, as well as
occupation-based activities. Some examples of purposeful activities that were implemented
include putting pennies in a bank, peg boards, and manipulating nuts and screws. Some
CIMT 19
examples of occupation-based activities included home maintenance, work-simulation, preparing
and eating meals, and playing cards, board games, and outdoor games.
Individuals’ treatment was centered on their goals, strengths, weaknesses, and current
recovery stage. Participants’ interests were considered during treatment planning so that clients
would perceive treatment activities as being both meaningful and purposeful (Kramer, Hinojosa,
& Royeen, 2003). All interventions were planned with reference to the Occupational Therapy
Practice Framework: Domain & Process in regards to activities of daily living (American
Occupational Therapy Association, 2008) as well as theory of CIMT/mCIMT.
Intervention activities focused on progressive arm movements deviating away from
flexor synergy. Therapeutic activities (tabletop and functional tasks, such as use of clothespins
and thera-putty) were used to facilitate repetitive use of the affected upper extremity.
Neurorehabilitative techniques were incorporated in blocked and random practice. Rood