32DMNE0138W9580-00081 MCVITTIE 010 SUMMARY REPORT ON THE 1993/94 REGIONAL REVERSE CIRCULATION EXPLORATION PROGRAM ROYAL OAK MCVITTIE/BEAVERHOUSE - OPTIONS ******************************************* PREPARED BY W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD. FOR SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD. FILE: SC\197\rloass94 JUNE 15, 1994 D.R. JAMIESON, B.Se, H.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTING LTD.
97
Embed
ROYAL OAK MCVITTIE/BEAVERHOUSE - OPTIONS PREPARED BY · 32dmne0138w9580-00081 mcvittie 010 summary report on the 1993/94 regional reverse circulation exploration program royal oak
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
32DMNE0138W9580-00081 MCVITTIE010
SUMMARY REPORT
ON THE
1993/94
REGIONAL REVERSE CIRCULATION
EXPLORATION PROGRAM
ROYAL OAK MCVITTIE/BEAVERHOUSE - OPTIONS
*******************************************
PREPARED BY
W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
FOR
SUDBURY CONTACT MINES LTD.
FILE: SC\197\rloass94 JUNE 15, 1994 D.R. JAMIESON, B.Se,
Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. is involved in the exploration of a large group of claims called "The Diamond Lake Project" in Gauthier, Mcvittie, Arnold, Katrine, McElroy, and Hearst Townships totalling 267 claims and 22,920 acres. The Royal Oak Mcvittie l Beaverhouse option is part of this project. The exploration projects carried out are oriented towards diamonds and gold.
Since Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. acquired the rights to the above stated property through an option agreement with Royal Oak Mines Ltd. and Queenston Mining Ltd., a multifaceted program has been executed on the claims.
This report covers the initial phase of work, which consisted of reconnaissance Reverse Circulation drilling on both the Beaverhouse option and the Royal Oak Mcvittie option. Data from this drilling was used in conjunction with drilling data from other claim blocks to isolate specific gold and kimberlite indicator mineral glacial dispersal trains in the Diamond Lake Project area.
A reconnaissance 8 hole Reverse Circulation Drilling program was initiated in February, 1993, on claims optioned from Royal Oak Mines Ltd in Mcvittie township (Royal Oak Mcvittie option). Four Reverse Circulation holes were also drilled on claims optioned from Royal Oak Mines and Queenston Mining in Gauthier and Mcvittie townships (Beaverhouse option). Three follow-up Reverse Circulation holes were drilled on the Royal Oak Mcvittie option in July 1993. An additional seven holes were drilled on the Beaverhouse option in February 1994.
Holes were laid out at approximately 500 to 1000 metre intervals along the southern and central portions of the claim groups for reconnaissance work. Follow-up work was done on 100 to 200 metre spacings.
Results of this program indicate that gold dispersal trains exist on the properties, with possible gold sources ranging from 50 to 2000 metres up-ice of individual holes.
Kimberlite indicator mineral counts were generally low on the properties, with the exception of the central portion of the Beaverhouse option.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
INTRODUCTION
The subject of this report is the presentation and interpretation of data from twelve Reverse Circulation holes drilled on the Royal Oak/Queenston properties during the winter of 1993, three follow-up holes drilled in the summer of 1993, and seven holes drilled during the winter of 1994.
The Royal Oak Mcvittie Property, optioned from Royal Oak Mines Ltd., comprises 57 claims totalling 2200 acres in Mcvittie Township.
The Beaverhouse Property, optioned from Royal Oak Mines Ltd and Queenston Mining Ltd comprises 36 claim totalling 1480 acres in Gauthier and Mcvittie townships.
These claims form part of a claim block assembled during the past several years by Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. in Gauthier, Mcvittie, McElroy, Katrine, Arnold d Hearst Townships in the Larder Lake Mining Division of northeastern Ontario.
From 1986 to 1991, exploration programs have been focused on known auriferous targets along the Larder Lake Break as well as identifying new targets along other structures for drill testing. These programs utilized the extensive data base acquired in the Larder Lake Gold Camp by Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. since 1972.
In 1989, a kimberlite dyke discovery was made by RC drilling on the Diamond Lake Option (Skead Holdings Inc.) in Mcvittie Township by Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. The discovery was later confirmed by diamond drilling. In 1990, diamond drilling discovered a Kimberlite Pipe ("Diamond Lake Pipe fi") on this same property.
This discovery led Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. to aquire surrounding lands and initiate a reconnaissance exploration strategy. Reverse Circulation drilling was determined to be the best method of evaluating large areas of prospective terrain for both gold and kimberlite potential.
Samples were taken of till and gravel material, as well as some glaciofluvial sand. Processing to recover sand and silt size gold and kimberlite indicator minerals from these samples was done by Overburden Drilling Management.
Bedrock chips from the bottom of the holes were described during drilling and assayed for gold by Assayers Laboratories.
The coordination and implementation of the various technical tasks was conducted by H. A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd. under the supervision of P. Hubacheck, D. Christie and D. Jamieson.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
LOGISTICS
R.C. Drilling:
Assay Lab:
Mineral Processing:
Senior Geologist:
Project Geologist:
Contract Geologist
Heath and Sherwood Drilling Kirkland Lake, Ontario
Assayers LabsRouyn Noranda, Quebec
Overburden Drilling Management Nepean, Ontario
Peter C. Hubacheck, P. Geol. 2401 Pyramid Cres. Mississauga, Ontario L5K 1E1
David W. Christie, B.Se. 1412 - 88 Redpath Ave. Toronto, Ontario M4S 2J8
David Jamieson, B.Se. 31 Finchurst Road Peterborough, Ontario K9J 8E9
H.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
PROPERTY AMD PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION
The Royal Oak Mcvittie property consists of 57 claims totalling approximately 2200 acres in west-central Mcvittie township. Larder Lake Mining Division, and are numbered as follows: 767701, 802384, 1137130, 1137131, 1137134, 1137135, 1137128, 1137129, 1111182, 1111183, 1111184, 1111185, 1111186, 1110272, 1110273, 1110274, 1110275, 1110276, 767405, 767406, 767407, 767408, 767409, 767415, 767416, 767417, 767418, 767419, 767425, 767426, 767427, 767428, 767429, 767435, 767436, 767437, 767438, 767439, 767443, 767444, 767445, 767446, 767447, 767451, 767452, 767453, 767454, 767455, 767456, 767457, 767460, 767461, 767462, 767463, 767464, 767465, 767466.
The Beaverhouse property consists of 36 claims totalling approximately 1480 acres in northeast Gauthier township and northwest Mcvittie township, Larder Lake Mining Division, and are numbered as follows: LS 340, LS 339, 2601, 2602, 2586, 2587, 2588, 2589, 6246, 6247, 7934, 35279, 67180, 67288, 72883, 7055, 7056, 9150, 9151, 9152, 9153, 9154, 9155, 9178, 9179, 9180, 9545, 9546, 9551, 9552, 9553, 9554, 9555, 9556, 9557, 2650.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The Royal Oak Mcvittie claims are located in west-central Mcvittie township and are roughly bounded on three sides by the Misema River, and the Beaverhouse-Spectacle Lake drainage system. The claim group lies 3 km west of Larder Lake, l km north of Highway66, and is accessible along the west boundary by the Fork Lake road. Numerous trails and drill roads, as well as Spectacle, Moosehead and Beaverhouse Lakes provide access to the north and east portions of the property. The Misema River, flanked on the east by a south treading esker ridge is the dominant geographic feature.
The Beaverhouse claims are located in northern Gauthier and Mcvittie township at the southwest end of Beaverhouse Lake. The claim group lies 3 km west of Larder Lake, 10 km north of Highway 66, and is accessible by the Upper Beaver Mine road from the town of Dobie. A winter road extends northeast across the property from the Upper Beaver Mine toward the Beaverhouse native village on Beaverhouse Lake.
The area is dominated by the Archean Upper Super group; namely the Kinojevis, Temiskaming and Blake River assemblages.
The Kinojevis Group comprises Mg-rich and Fe-rich tholeittic basalts, and minor andesite, dacite and rhyodacite flows and tuffs with associated thin interflow argillites and cherts.
The Blake River Group comprises calc-alkalic basalts, andesite, dacite and rhyolite flows and tuffs, and minor related volcaniclastics. Both groups contain sills and stocks of gabbroic and dioritic affinity.
The Temiskaming Group comprises K-rich alkalic and calc-alkalic volcanics, (Mafic, intermediate, plus trachytic types and minor dacites and rhyolites), and related conglomerates, wackes and argillites.
Pyroclastic deposits are quite common, and are likely related to the various volcanic phases. The Temiskaming Group was localized within a graben between the Kinojevis/Blake River Groups located mainly to the north and the Larder Lake and Skead Groups to the south.
Eruptive and depositional litho-tectonic facies appear to be disconformable within these groups, with some localization of volcanics along shears and fractures possibly related to rifting and graben formation.
This active faulting along a probable rift margin was likely related to activity which produced or at least reactivated the Kirkland-Larder Lake Fault Zone. (KLLFZ).
The region is dominated by this "break" with the Temiskaming Group lying immediately to the north or straddling the discontinuity. The other major structural feature in the region is the Blake River Synclinorium, with the area under discussion being located on it's south limb.
In most general terms, gold mineralization in the area and on a semi-regional scale occurs at or proximal to the Temiskaming-Larder Lake Group boundariesl time stratigraphic datums.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
QUATERNARY GEOLOGY
The landforms visible in the Kirkland Lake area today are largely the result of the latest glacial event. However, at least two earlier glacial events are locally preserved. Glacial striae indicate that the oldest ice sheet approached the area from approximately 240 degrees, the second oldest from 180 degrees and the latest from 165 degrees. Glacial drift from this last event is termed the Matheson Till.
Several north-south trending esker systems occur in the Kirkland Lake area, noteably the Munroe, Misema, Boundary, and Airport Eskers. These systems are composed of poorly- to well-sorted glaciofluvial sands and gravels. It is important to note that these systems can rework and remove till sheets down to bedrock near the cores of the esker, and rework and intercalate with till sheets along esker margins.
Glaciolaucustrine sediments of clay, silt and fine sand cover till and glaciofluvial sequences in low-lying areas. Large areas of fine- to medium-grained, well-sorted sand cover has developed from laucustrine wave action along esker systems with subsequent local sand dune formation.
- - - - - - N.% jv^ - - ^-~ ' - - - V v l\-. V *:*MC.X*—^v^ x-xp^^L-^-^5 l\
VOLCAMC ROCKS
TONAUTC AM)
SEOMENTARY ROCKSi . . . . ARCHEAN
POST.AMCHCAN
SYMBOLS
cowmcT
^——— FAULT ZOIC
MALAMTC OMMF
l LAMOCM UUtI OROUP
Fie 2 Simplified geological map of the southern Abitibi belt and die Po DM of the map area.
Proa: Lafleche and Dupuy 1992
: Subproviace (modified after OGS-MERQ WM). Inien: loca-
W.A. HDBACBECK COBSULTAHTS LTD.
REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLING
METHODOLOGY
The following figures help to illustrate the methodology of the Reverse Circulation Drilling technique. The purpose of sampling certain glacial materials is to locate the portions of ore-bodies that have been eroded by glaciation and distributed in a "train" down-ice of the ore-body.
Glacial action has reduced much of the material to sand and silt size, and it is grains of this size fraction which are examined in a laboratory for gold, sulphides and other minerals indicative of potentially economic deposits. Coarser material (gravel size and boulder chip material) can be examined and described at the drill by a geologist.
Case histories, Quaternary geological studies, and glacial studies all provide a data base which can be used to interpret the mineralogical results from a reverse circulation drilling program.
The most important material to sample during a reverse circulation program is commonly termed till. Till is poorly sorted debris which in most situations has travelled directly down-ice along the bottom of the glacier and has been smeared along bedrock surfaces, filling depressions and valleys. Basal till is the till lying directly on bedrock. Minerals found in this type of material can usually be traced by their relative abundance and morphology directly back up-ice to their source.
Unfortunately, till can be reworked or redeposited by water as well as rafted by ice flows, causing misinterpretations. Thus a large database is important for defining patterns based on numerous data points rather than single "spot highs".
In addition to glacial material, chips of bedrock are obtained at each drill hole location, making reverse circulation drilling a valuable mapping/prospecting tool in areas of poor bedrock exposure.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
DAYLIGHT SURFACE
LAKE SEOIME
oGLACOFL GRAVE!
BEDROCK
Figure 3. Idealized conceptual model illustrat ing the use of basal till as a prospe - cting medium in glacial terrain, using reverse circulation drilling as a sampling tecnnique.
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITEDFLOW SHEET l
UNWEATHERED TILL:DIAMOND PLUS GOLD EXPLORATION PACKAGE
Sulk Sampla (±10.O kg)
Character Sampto. tJOO a: STORE SpOI
STOW
lolutton)
Wat Stoa a* 1.00 to 2.00 mm
1.00 l* 2.00 mm: STOW
<1.00 nMn UOM rracftan: STOW
<I.OO mm: SMaUna TaMa CaM Crahi CaiMil
TaMa Cancanlrala: •anntag A Cold Groin Cannl
Ualrt rraclton: STOW
TaW* Caoe*nh-^a: (D - Uauid VtparoOan
(SO J.20P
aHeFnMnan: STOW
KO-2S mm:
STOK0)
Bry 9*" "J O JO * 0.29 HMI
0.23 to 0.90 mmanatte fi STOW (Orum
0.29 to 0.90 mm DOramagnaMc FranaK
NcUnfl
OJO to 1 OO mm knmaan.Hc Tn
yUamands: Racard *hatoafajaHteaTBy Grata ami "wfarm SCM Mcraaraa* l
0.90-** I'm *l O.SO mm ttU*mi4 *n O.M to 1.OO
9 SCM and onb* wark Darfomud at **tra co.!)O.SO mm traclton any
13
PROPERTY PHYSIOGRAPHY
The western portion of the Royal Oak Mcvittie property is dominated by the Misema Esker system, with sand and gravel accumulations locally exceeding 50 metres in thickness. Preservation of till beneath the esker is generally poor. Outwash sand deposits extend onto the central portions of the property. Good bedrock exposure occurs on the eastern side of the property, with thin to moderate thicknesses of till preserved in swamps and stream valleys.
The latest ice-flow direction appears to be from the north- northwest, with esker drainage generally from the north on the property. Older tills do not appear to have been encountered during this program.
Good bedrock exposure is found on most of the Beaverhouse property, with significant thicknesses of till and gravel occurring in larger swampy areas and buried drainage valleys. The Misema Esker forms large hills on the northeast side of the property.
The latest ice-flow direction would appear to be from the north- northwest. Older tills were encountered in buried valleys during this program.
SAMPLIHG RESULTS
A brief description of hole stratigraphy is given below. In general, only material interpreted to be till or esker gravel were sampled during this program. Material weights and grain counts indicate the amount of sample processed and subsequent recovery of gold grains. Several consecutive samples may be included in these numbers. Individual sample results as well as detailed overburden stratigraphy are found in the RG drill log and processing data sheet appendices.
ROYAL OAK MCVITTIE
Gold Grains
The following are hole descriptions and gold grain count results for holes drilled on the Royal Oak Mcvittie option.
RLO-93-1
The hole consisted of 28 metres of glaciofluvial sand and gravel. Samples were taken every l to 3 metres. The highest gold grain count from any one sample was 3, indicating background levels of gold grains in this esker material.
RLO-93-2
The entire hole consisted of glaciolacustrine outwash sands. No samples were taken.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
14
RLO-93-3
0.5 metres of till occur beneath 19.5 metres of glaciolacustrine clay and silt. 13 gold grains were returned, 7 of which were modified, from 8.0 kg of material. These results indicate a gold dispersal train is present, with a gold source 500 to 1000 metres up-ice.
RLO-93-4
0.7 metres of till occur beneath 13 metres of glaciolacustrine clay, l gold grain was returned from 6.6 kg of material reflecting background gold grain counts.
RLO-93-5
A 4 metre thickness of boulders and basal till occur beneath 2.0 metres of glaciolacustrine sand. A 4.5 kg sample of the glaciolacustrine sand returned 3 round, 2 modified and one pristine gold grain. Till was sampled above and between the boulders. 3.8 kg of material returned 87 gold grains, 86 of which were modified. 14 of these grains were examined by SEM, and were determined to have been liberated from a boulder by the tricone drill bit. The presence of a gold-rich boulder is inconclusive in terms of tranport distance, but does indicate the presence of a gold dispersal train in this area.
RLO-93-6
2.0 metres of glaciofluvial sand and gravel occur beneath 16.5 metres of glaciolacustrine sand, l round and l modified gold grain were recovered from 4.5 kg of basal gravel material, reflecting background gold grain levels.
RLO-93-7
A 1.5 metre thickness of glaciofluvial gravel occurs beneath 30 metres of glaciolacustrine clay and sand. 3 round gold grains were returned from 7.9 kg of material, reflecting background gold grain levels.
RLO-93-8
A 2.5 metre thickness of bouldery till and gravel occur beneath 2.5 metres of clay and organics. 18 gold grains, including 3 modified grains, were recovered from 6.9 kg of material. These results are indicative of a distal gold dispersal train, with a gold source 2 to 10 km up-ice.
RLO-93-9
0.5 metres of glaciolacustrine sand occurs beneath 6.5 metres of glaciolacustrine clay. 14 round gold grains were recovered from
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
15
4.6 kg of material, reflecting a distal gold source (5*10 km). The lack of till or gravel material in this hole essentially nullifies this hole as a data point.
RLO-93-10
l metre of till occurs beneath 8.5 metres of glaciolacustrine clay and sand. 13 gold grains including l modified and l pristine grain were returned from 9.0 kg of material. This appears to represent a weak proximal gold train with a gold source 500 to 1000 metres up-ice, possibly the same source that produced the gold-rich boulder intersected by RLO-93-5.
RLO-93-11
0.3 metres of till occurs beneath 15 metres of glaciolacustrine sand and clay. 2 round gold grains were recovered from 2.1 kg of material, reflecting background gold grain levels.
Kimberlite indicator mineral results
The highest grain counts were in RLO-93-11, with 2 chrome diopside grains and 3 pyrope grains in 2.1 kg of till and RLO-93-8 with 2 chrome diopside and 5 pyrope grains in 5.5 kg of till. These results represent background levels of kimberlite indicator minerals.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Results of this program indicate one or two gold dispersal trains may exist on the property, with possible gold sources ranging from 500 to 1000 metres up-ice of individual holes.
2. Kimberlite indicator mineral counts are generally low on the property.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The gold dispersal train(s) indicated by RLO-93-3 and 5, and 10 require further Reverse Circulation drilling and/or backhoe pit till sampling north of the holes. This work is recommended on a moderate priority basis and should be guided by a compilation of geological mapping, geophysics, and diamond drilling results.
2. Additional Reverse Circulation drilling should be done around the north end of Moosehead Lake, and the south end of Spectacle Lake in order to extend the kimberlite indicator mineral/gold grain data base. This program could be done in conjunction with work planned on other properties in the area.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
16
BEAVERHOUSE OPTION
Gold Grains
The following are hole descriptions and gold grain count results and interpretation for the eleven holes drilled on this project.
RQO-93-1
0.3 metres of till was intersected beneath 4.5 metres of glaciolacustrine clay. 3 pristine gold grains were recovered from l. l kg of material. This indicates a proximal gold grain dispersal train, with a gold source less than 100 metres up-ice.
RQO-93-1A
15.5 meters of till, sand and gravel occur beneath 15.5 metres of glaciolacustrine clay and silt. The basal till sample returned 15 gold grains, including 13 modified grains from 9.5 kg of material. O.2% chalcopyrite was noted in the concentrate. 10 samples from the remaining till and gravel sections returned 88 gold grains, including 3 modified and l pristine grain from 77.8 kg of material. These results indicate that a proximal gold grain dispersal train is present, with a gold source between 200 and 700 metres up-ice. The lower portion of this till sequence may be older than Matheson age, therefore the true ice-direction is unknown.
RQO-93-2
4 metres of till occur beneath 3.5 metres of brown clay. 4 round gold grains were returned from 12.4 kg of material. This result reflects background levels of gold grains.
ROO-93-3
9.5 metres of till occur beneath 9.5 metres of glaciofluvial clay. The basal till sample returned l round gold grain from 8.3 kg of material. 5 samples from the remaining till section returned 38 gold grains including 2 modified grains from 49.5 kg of material. These results indicate background levels of gold grains.
RQO-93-4
9.5 metres of sandy till occur beneath 6 metres of clay and organics. Modified or pristine grains occur throughout the till section. There appears to be a distinct break at 11.5 metres. From 11.5 metres to 15.5 metres (basal till), 17 gold grains including 14 pristine and 2 modified grains were recovered from 18.76 kg of till. This indicates a very proximal gold source, possibly within 50 metres up-ice of the hole. The upper till
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
17
section, from 6.0 to 11.5 metres returned 20 gold grains including 8 modified and 2 pristine grains from 41.35 kg of sample. This indicates a second gold source is present 100 to 500 metres up-ice.
RQO-94-5
6.5 metres of till, gravel and boulders occur beneath 4 metres of silt and fine-grained sand. The upper till section, from 4.0 to 9.0 metres appears to have been heavily reworked, consisting of a boulder lag overlain by cobbly stoney till and a moderately sorted gravel unit. One gold grain was recovered from 19.82 kg of material, indicating low background levels of gold grains. The lower till section consists of 1.5 metres of basal sandy till overlain by 2 metres of stoney cobbly till. 6 gold grains including 2 modified grains were recovered from 17.4 kg of material, indicating background levels of gold grains. The presence of 2 modified grains in the basal sample of the till sequence may represent the edge of the proximal train intersected in RQO-94-4.
RQO-94-6
15 metres of sandy till occurs beneath 5 metres of clay and organics. The basal till section from 15 to 20 metres returned 12 gold grains including 3 modified grains, from 54.67 kg of sample material. This indicates background levels of gold grains. The upper 10 metres of till returned 38 gold grains, including 16 modified grains from 64.13 kg of sample. This indicates the presence of a gold source 500 to 1000 metres up-ice.
RQO-94-7
One metre of sandy till occurs beneath 16.2 metres of sand and silt/clay. 4 gold grains, including one modified grain, were returned from 4.75 kg of sample material. This indicates background gold grain levels.
RQO-94-8
2 metres of till occur beneath 2 metres of clay and overlies 2 metres of cobble/boulder lag. 5 gold grains were recovered from 5.65 kg of material, indicating background levels of gold grains. No gold grains were recovered from the basal lag material.
RQO-94-9
2 metres of gravel occurs beneath l metre of organic material. No gold grains were recovered from 5.25 kg of material.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
18
RQO-94-9A
3.5 metres of sandy till occur beneath 3.5 metres of organics and silt. 3 round gold grains were recovered from 9.46 kg of material, indicating background gold grain levels.
Kimberlite indicator mineral results
Relatively high grain counts occur in holes RQO-93-1A, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The highest count was from a sample of well sorted sand and gravel in RQO-93-1A. 50 pyropes, 15 chrome diopsides, l orange garnet, l ilmenite and l chromite were recovered.
Higher grain counts occur toward the top or centre of the till sections indicating a distal source. The trend of higher grain counts indicates a dispersal train trending northeast, with counts decreasing both to the north and south on a regional scale.
Grain counts in till units generally have chrome diopside:pyrope ratios of close to 1:1, while sand and gravel samples generally have ratios closer to 2:1. Grains appear to distributed relatively evenly throughout to the till sections, which may indicate a source several kilometres or more up-ice. Most samples contained no ilmenite and chromite grains > 0.5 mm.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
19
CONCLUSION
1. A proximal gold dispersal train(s) is present in the vicinity of holes RQO-93-1 and 1A. The small till sample in RQO- 93-1 makes interpretation difficult, but this hole appears to be sampling Matheson till and is within 100 metres of gold mineralization.
2. A proximal gold dispersal train is present in the vicinity of RQO-94-4, with the gold source possibly being within 50 metres up-ice. The same source may be responsible for gold grains in the basal till of RQO-94-1A.
3. A proximal gold dispersal train is present 500 to 1000 metres up-ice of RQO-94-6.
4. Significant kimberlite indicator mineral counts from 5 holes reflect a possible glacial dispersal train with a kimberlite source located within a few kilometres up-ice. Most of the material sampled appears to be Matheson till or intertill sands and gravels. Up-ice direction appears to be to the northeast.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Detailed Reverse Circulation drilling and backhoe pits should by used to follow-up gold grain results in RQO-93-1. Reverse Circulation drilling at 100 metre centres should be done north, west and east of RQO-93-1A to verify and outline a possible gold dispersal train in this area.
2. Detailed Reverse Circulation drilling, geophysics and diamond drilling should be used to follow-up gold grain results from RQO-94-4 and 6. Several discrete auriferous zones may exist within a kilometer north of these holes.
3. Additional Reverse Circulation drilling northeast of the property is needed to determine if a kimberlite indicator mineral train is present.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
20
HOTES OH INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
The results of RG drilling programs done in 1993 have been interpreted using the following guidelines, based on personal communications with Stu Averill and the use of several references on glacial processes.
1. The weight of material or sample stated for each hole in the report refers to the table feed weight of the sample. This weight is used to normalize all gold grain counts for interpretive comparisons.
2. Unless otherwise stated, all till units intersected by drilling are assumed to be Matheson till, which is generally assumed to have resulted from glaciation originating from the north-northeast .
3. For gold grains, a count of l round grain per kilogram of table feed material has been used as a preliminary background level for the area of interest. An attempt has been made to explain local changes in background levels and adjust interpretations accordingly. A count of l modified or pristine grain in 50 kilograms of table feed material has been used as a preliminary background level.
4. Generally, samples in which no modified or pristine gold grains occur, are interpreted to have no contribution from traceable gold dispersal trains and are only useful in determining background levels of round gold grains in the area, no matter how high the grain count.
5. The number of round gold grains above local background is determined for any samples having more than one modified or pristine gold grain. Although only one or two modified or pristine grains could indicate a proximal bedrock gold source, they could also result from the disaggregation of a gold bearing boulder just up ice of the sample or tearing of gold from a boulder by the tricone bit. SEM examination of the grains can aid in determining if the latter situation has occurred.
6. The following guidelines are used to estimate transport distance of the above-background gold grain population:
7. The size of gold grains and the calculated or concentrate assays are not generally a significant factor, especially in the Kirkland Lake camp.
W. A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
21
8. For kimberlite indicator mineral counts, one grain of chrome diopside or pyrope garnet per kilogram of table feed material may be a reasonable background level. The differences between gold and kimberlite indicator mineral morphology as well as the fact that kimberlite indicator mineral tracing is in its infancy in this area, makes interpretation difficult. Statistical analyses of a large number of sample points and situations may provide a better feeling for the significance of grain counts.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
22
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barrie, C.Q.; 1987:
Barrie, C.Q. 1991:
Report on an Airborne Magnetic and VLF-EM Survey in the Larder Lake Area: Hearst, McElroy, Gauthier and Mcvittie Townships; Terraquest Ltd.
Report on a High Sensitivity Magnetic and VLF-EM Airborne Survey; Larder Lake North, Gauthier, Mcvittie, McElroy and Hearst Townships. Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario, for Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd., by Terraquest Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, July 15, 1991.
Easton, R.M.,Johns, G.W.;1986: Volcanology and Mineral Exploration: The
Application of Physical Volcanology and Facies Studies, Part One of Volcanology and Mineral Deposits, OGS MP 129, pp 4-40.
Fortescue et al;1984: KLIP Basal Till Study; OGS Open File R.5506.
Hubacheck, P. 1991:
Hughes, T.; 1990:
Christie, D.W., Hughes, T.N.J.;Summary Report on the Larder Townsite, Diamond Lake, Wendigo Projects, May 3, 1990 to February 15, 1991. Prepared for Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. by W.A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd.
Summary Report on Diamond Lake - Fork Lake Project, Dec. 1989, W.A. Hubacheck Consultants.
Hughes, T.N.J.;1991 Geological Mapping Compilation and Airborne
Geophysical Assessment Report on the Diamond Lake Project Area, prepared for Sudbury Contact Mines Ltd. by H.A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd. Nov. 1991.
Belt: Structural And Stratigraphic Studies in the Larder Lake Area, Summary of Field Work and other Activities, 1990, OGS MP 151.
Jackson, S.L.;1988: Project Number 88-33. The Abitibi Greenstone Belt
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
23
Near Larder Lake: Structural and Stratigraphic Studies, OGS M.P. 141, Summary of Field Work and Other Activities,1988, pp 206-211.
Jensen, L.S.;1985: Synoptic Mapping of the Kirkland Lake - Larder Lake
Areas, District of Timiskaming; OGS MP 126.
Jensen and Langford;1985: Geology and Petrogenesis of the Archean Abitibi Belt
in the Kirkland Lake Area; OGS MP 123.
W.A. HUBACHECK CONSULTANTS LTD.
24
CERTIFICATE
I, David R. Jamieson, of the City of Peterborough, in the Province of Ontario, Canada, do hereby certify that:
(1) I am an Exploration Geologist, residing at 31 Finchurst Road Peterborough, Ontario contracted to W.A. Hubacheck Consultants Ltd., 141 Adelaide St. West, Suite 1401 Toronto, Ontario.
(2) I am a graduate of the University of Waterloo and received my Bachelor of Science degree in Earth Sciences in 1985, and have been practicing my profession as an Exploration Geologist continuously since graduation.
(3) I am member of The Prospector and Developers Association of Canada, The Association of Quebec Prospectors, and The Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy-Kirkland Lake Branch.
(4) This report is based on personal examination of the properties between January 1993, and March 1994.
(5) I have no personal interest in the properties or securities of Sudbury Contact.
Toronto, OntarioJune 15, 1994 David R. Jamieson, B.Se.
w. A . HTmarHHr-K CONRTTT.TANTS T.TO
APPENDIX A REVERSE CIRCULATION OVERBURDEN DRILL LOGS
Size of Clast:6: GranulesP: PebblesCi CobblesBL: Boulder ChipsBKt Bedrock Chips
•l Clast Compositions V/S: Volcanics and Sediments 6R: Granitics LS: Limestone OTi Other Lithologics
(Refer to Footnotes) TR: Only Trace Present MA: NOT APPLICABLE OX: Oxidized
S/U: Sorted or UnsortedSOi Sand ST: SiltCY: ClayORi Organics
l Fi Finel M: Mediuml Ct Coarse
Y: Fraction Present*: Fraction relatively more abundant-i Fraction relatively less abundantN: Fraction Not PresentL: Lumps Present
Colour;B: Beige6Y: GreyGB:GN:GG:BN:BK:
Grey Beige Green Grey Green Brown Black
PP; PurplePK: PinkOC: OchreDOCt Dark OchreHOC: Medium OchreLOC: Light Ochre
GOLD LOGNumber of Grains;
T: Number Found on Shaking Table P: Number Found by Panning
Thickness!C: Calculated Thickness of Grain (in microns) M: Actual Measured Thickness of Grain
KIM LOG Grains picked:
GP: Pyrope garnetGO: Orange mantle garnet; incl. both eclogitic (63) and Cr-poor megacryst
(G1/G2) varieties} in some samples, may include a few grains of common crustal garnet (65) lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces.
DC: Chrome diopside, emerald green; paler green low-Cr diopside picked separately. IL: Picroilmenite; in some samples, may include a few grains of common
crustal ilmenite lacking diagnostic inclusions or crystal faces.
-SflMPLE NO: REMflRKS;3751 SEM check of l possible GO fro* 0.5-1.0 mm crustal grossular
almandine.
3752 Picked 3 low-Cr diopside fro* (0.5 **.
3755 SEM check of 2 possible GP fro* 05.5 mm ~ l spinel and l alean check of 4 pale pyroxene fro* W. 5 mm 2 low-Cr diospide (ret 2 diopside (returned to saiple).
-3756 Picked l low-Cr diopside fro* (0.5 mm.
3758 Picked 2 chroiites fro* (0.5 **. SEM check of l possible GP fr confined as zircon; SEM check of 3 pale green grains fro* (0.5 diopside with very low Gr, and l Cr-andradite (grains retained)
.3760 Picked l possible GO fro* (0.5 mm.
3762 SEM check of l , ..e green pyroxene grain fro* )0.5 mm diopsi very low CR; picked blue spinel fro* (0.5 ee.
3765 SEM check of 2 pale green pyroxenes fro* (0.5 mm — l diopside low Cr (retained) and l diopside (returned to saiple).
3763 Picked l 60 fro* (0.5 mm.
.3769 Picked l GO fro* (0.5 mm.
3772 SEM check of 2 possible CR fro* )0.5 mm both grains crustal
Senior Geologist. . . . . 3.^ days at 0350.00/day......01050.00Project Geologist... ,5.\ days at 0250.00/day......01250.00Contract Geologist. . ?;VKi days at $225.00/day. . . . . 04725.00Geological Assistants8T5* days at 0105.00/day.....01575.50
Field Supplies....................................01109.90Gas/Oil............................................0448.60Equipment Rental (GPS).............................0585.30Truck/ATV Rental..................................01319.82Shipping/Pails.....................................0742.83Food and Lodging..................................01482.00Mob/demob..........................................0816.68
Ministry ofjNo.tnem Development^M44 ftJaM^Ma/id MinoB m
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Transaction Number
Personal information coHecled on mn form is obtained under the authority of the Mkv— — i collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. MM y. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
(JJ 1580* 000&1
tfone: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for reqt Recorder. SZDMNEOIMI vwswwxxwi McvrrnE- A separate copy of this form must be^ompfeied for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to. must accompany this form.
\900
***** SUDBURY COHTACT MINES LTD., 401 BAY ST.. STE. 2302. TORONTO, ONT. M5HMining DMaion TowneNpMiaa LARDER LAKE GAUTHIER /Off? Pmm. MARCH 3, 4, 20, 21, 1993nmn r rum. Performed .TI1T.V 11 , 1QQ1
2Y4
MCVITTIE
UfcWUr^ (^5^416-947-1212
M or Q Plan No. G-3211/G-3163
ft? FEB. 22, 23, 24, 1994Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)
otal Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costa S —^—^-^———lota: The Minister may reject for assessment work credK eJ or part of the sssessmsnt work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditurea claimed in tha statement of costs wHhin 30 daya of a request for verification.'eraona and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name
DAVID R. JAMIESON
HEATH 6 SHERWOOD INC.
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MGEMT.
AddressR.R. 8, PETERBOROUGH, ONT. K9J 6X9
P.O.BOX 998, 34 DUNCAN A VE. N. , KIRKLAND LAKE, ON'otm-. t -r -t
107 - 15 CAPELLA COURT, NEPEAN, ONT. K2E 7X1
fl
-eJfl n aifH n aiuimvuoti •^•— 4 —— -.wu. i oni certify that at the nma th* work we* parfa "•port were recorded in the CUR** holder's r by the current recorded hoUer.
l. Mie dame covered hi Into nark i or held under e TffTTp
truncation of Worfc Raportl certify that l have a pommel Knowledge of the its completion and annexed report ie true.
eat forth in tMe work report having performed the work or wttnia during and/or after
11 33,9'
.Ministry of Norfner D' Oevetopment and Mines
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Cfaim
Mining ActPersonal information coilactad on this form is obtained undar tha authority of tha Mining Act. Thia information will ba uaad for corraapondanca. Quastions about this collection should ba directed to tha Provincial Manager. Mining Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (70S) 670-7264.
Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form in duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.
401 BAY ST.. STE. 2302, TORONTO, OUT. M5Hj Mining Division 1 LARDER LAKE
Township/Area GAUTHIER 1
| ST From: MARCH 3, 4, 20, 21, 1993 1 Psrformed .TTTT.V 11, 1Q11
2Y4
MCVITTIE
Client No. l "2, c "2. 2- Co 198617 , #^ to
Telephone No. 416-947-1212
M or Q Plan No. G-3211/G-3163
SK FEB. 22, 23, 24, 1994
Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)1 Work Group
ul1t 1i
Geotechnical SurveyPhysical Work. Including Drilling
Rehabilitation
Other Authorized Work
Assays
Assignment from Reserve
TypeOVERBURDEN DRILLING (REVERSE CIRCULATION)
Total Assessment Work Claimed on tha Attached Statement of Costs $ 53 ' 297 ' 00Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit al or part of tha assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditurea daimad in tha statement of coats within 30 daya of a raquaat tor verification.Persona and Survey Company Who Performed tha Work (Give Mama and Addraaa of Author of Report)Name Address
DAVID R. JAMIESON R.R. 8, PETERBOROUGH, OUT. K9J 6X9HEATH S SHERWOOD INC. P.O.BOX 998, 34 DUNCAN AVE. N., KIRKLAND LAKE, ON"
Certification of Beneficial Interest * Sea Note No. 1 on reverse aidel certify that at tha time tha work was performed, the claims covered in tMa work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held undar a l by the currant recorded holder.
Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facia aat forth in tMa Work report, having performed tha work or its completion and annexed report is true. sama dunng and/or after
Name fed Address (X Person Cerffylna
For Office Uaa Onlyrotal Value Cr Recorded Data Recorded
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
,Approval Date Q
JAN 9 1995Dsts Nonce lor Amendments Sent
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers du Devetoppement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Coste for Assessment CreditIztat des couts aux fins du credit devaluationMining Act/Loi sur lee mines
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mning Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presents formula sent recueills en vertu de la Lot sur lea mines et serviront a tenir a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser tout* question sur la coflece de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers. ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines. 159. rue Cedar. 4* etaga. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/Gouts directs
Type
Wages SatoJres
and Consultant's Fees DroHade rentrepreneuret de I'expert- conaall
Supplies Used Foumtturea irtfltsees
Rental Location de
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur to terrain
Type REVERSE CIRCLTLATION.TDMINERAL PROCESSING
ASSAYINGTW* FLAGS/AXES PAILS/SIEVES
GAS /OILFKJ.NTJ.Nli/
DRAFTING
Typ-GPS
Amount Montant
.575.50
F025.00
BILLING
8971.1
496.4
Totals Total global
860O.5
r^wrSNOHSHOES 1109. 9b
448. 6fl!
182.94
ll74X,^585.30
Total Direct Costs Total des couts directs
^^MI8891.ll
2. Indirect Costs/CoOts Indirects** Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not allowable as assessment work.Pour to remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indlrects ne sont pas admissMes en tant que travaux d'evaluatton.
46
Type
Transportation Transport
Lodging NourfttuPS st
dSflioMBsaDon
DescriptionTyp. TROCK/ATV SNOWMOBILE
3HIPPING/COURI
MOBILIZE DRILI 1OB.PERSGNELL
Amount Montant
1319.1
ER 789.
1482. 0(
816. 6t
Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partJel des couts Indlrects
Montant admtssMe (n'excedant pea 20 H des i
(ToW of Direct and Afcnrabto d'tvakMtto MmctcoMsI fToMdMci
act Costa) louts dlracts]to du credtt n ribdkMtt
Totals Total global
2
23
2109.0!
1482. (
816.61
4407.7
4407.7:
53299.'
0
3
MMractti
Note: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
:Letitutaire igMri i tenu de verifier lee depenses damandeas dansle present etat des couts dans las 30 jours suivant une demande a eel effet Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. le ministre peut rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluatkxi presentes.
Filing Discounts Remises pour depot1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at 100*fe of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit
1. Les travaux deposes dans las deux ans suivant tour acnevement sont rembourste a 100 Sb da la vateur totato susmentionnea du credl d'evabafion.2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 50*Mi of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Ai ntClai
x 0.50
2. Les travaux deposes trots, quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevement sont rarnbourses A 50 tt de la valeur totato du credit d'evaluatJon susmentJonne. Voir les caJculs ct-dessous.Valeur totato du credtt d'evakiation
x 0.50Evaluation totato demandea
Certification Verifying Statement of Costsl hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accomfiknying Report of Work form.
that as
Attestation de Petat des couts
J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur lee terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-joint.
je suis autonse taeomp^jnte)(Racordad Hold*. Aawit. Position in
to make this certification
0212 (04M1) Note : Dans cette formuto. loraqu'ldtelgne des personnes, to masculin est utilise au sens neutre.
-JO!-g4kUl SO
M
-J Ol
4kM 09
M
-J Ol
4k Ul 01
H"
01
4k 0 SO
H"
Ol
4k O 09
M
-J 01
4k O -J
H
01
4k O Ol
M
-J Ol
4k O Ul
H
soM 09O
M
-
SO Ul4kOl
H
SO Ul UlUl
H"
SOM UlUl
M
-J O UlUl
M
•J 0 UlOl
"
SO H" UlUl
H
SO Ul Ul4k
M
\^
roOlo10
M
^
Off
liif
N
Ul Ul 09O
SOUlUl
roo o
soUlUl
roo09O
soUlUl
roUl
o
SOUlUl
roo090
soUlUl
10o09o
soUlUl
H 09ro0
soUlUl
M SO
soUlUl
H SO
0
roUl
o
o
Ul Ol4k 0
0
M 01O
0
01o
o
Ul SO0o
0
roo09O
o
Ulf- -JSO
o
ro ro09o
0
m-m*
iffr
ro* i**Ul
M 0* Ol Ul
M H*. Ul
M i* O Ul
MH
Ul
M H1
Ul
09 09 Ul
Ul4k 09ilk
ilk 4k h-1so
roUl4k O
Ul 0t4k O
4k H 0tO
4k H 0t0
Ulsoa a
M0 090
-' -
UlH -J SO
ro ro09o H'
M)
s***
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to miriimto ttw advora* effects of aucft deletloM. pleaseu^^i^aW mtm i^ m - -— - - i iiaBa fuh ^h^A^MA SaW^ fi^f^^l^^ ^^ ^^^^S^^ a^M—— — ^. ^^i^kaaV t \ — -~ -— ^M SaW^ •^•M^h^k^^^Biawiiiui cttwns you wwn in pnonzv nw cmvoon ot cffvoK*. inveaW nieVic |*^| onv or mv wwowwiy.1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the dakn Mad last, working backwards.2. yi^ Credits are to be cut back eouaMy over afl claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as prlortzed on the attached appendix.In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one w* be implemented.
Note 2: If work hoe been performed on
l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial or leased land at the time the work was performed
interest in the patented Signature Date
s*S*2. c
^
M H Ul•J HUlH
H
H H Ul -J HU)0
M
H H Ul
t-110VO
H
H* H Ul-J
1000
M
M H M M H00a\
M
Hill
00Ul
H
H H HM M00
M
Hill
00Ul
H
H H H H M0010
M
H M H O IO-J
M
H HH 0 10ojUl
-
H M Ho10^Jl*
H
HM Ho-siUl
M
11102
-j10
M
76770
M
H
•sj
•tfct*sj
M
9\-J
O\
t-1
B!!ifof•3
2
2^s.<
113-
I
0"
voUlUl
o
voU)Ul
o
voUlUl
0
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
VOUlUl
o
voUlUl
0
voUlUl
0
voUIUl
o
VOUlUl
0
voUlUl
0
VOUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
VOUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
VOUlUl
MUl
o
voUlUl
Q3 3fjfSjj.8 aoo|Sfsl~
flif3 5"^ A
•4e
l 1
gaa it
9
M
0 Ul
<1-
lil?f 3-3*s?*a
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorite the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. ^ Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please lowing/?^l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.
3 S
?l -J en*j 4k4kUl
H
-sien-J4k4k4k
M
•sja\"i 4k4kUl
M
*Jen-j4kUl00
M
-J m-J4kUl-J
M
O\ -J4kUlUl
M
*J O^14k10VO
M
-J en••J 4kto00
H
•Nl
en-j4kIO0
M
-0 Ol•sj 4k10a\
"
-J en-JtoUl
H
-J en-j4kMVO
M
•Jen*j4kH*J
H
5i— ien
H
-j en•s)4kHUl
H
M M Ul -JHUlUl
M
H H Ul -JHUl4k
H
r|
fifz-f
CQ f llf
-4
Z
1
Oa-
*ml
o
VOUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
0
voUlUl
0
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
VOUlUl
0
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
voUlUl
o
VOUlUl
o
voUlUl
8iioo't?3 * 2.3 * "*
-* ̂
fit!
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (•J one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. S, Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. G Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented | s'9na'"re f or leased land at the time the work was performed.
Date
fiCA -J
767701
M
H H 00 Ul
UlM
M
802384
H
767466
H
767465
M
767464
M
767463
H
767462
M
767461
M
767460
H
767457
M
767456
H
767454
H
767453
M
767452
M
767451
t-1
zf
ifof•3
CO f3 So 3• s""?
UtUl
WVO-J
Ul Ul
MVO
0
0100
0
4k CA
O
VO Ul-J
o
VO Ul Ul
0
VO Ul Ul
o
VO Ul Ul
o
voUl Ul
0
voUl Ul
o
voUl Ul
o
voUl Ul
o
VO Ul Ul
o
voUl Ul
o
VO Ul Ul
0
voUl Ul
0
voUl Ul
o
voUl Ul
o ^
SSMHI-
Oo*o ̂Ifff
ir
li
00 00 K)
Is?*9
Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (s) one of the following:1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.2. ^Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.
Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.
Note 2: H work has been performed on patented or leased land, please comptefe Me/following^.l certify lhal the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented cr leased land at the time the work was performed.
M \A~'CoateL. j i J0Moi_^""^ """™ "~** i" "~~"* i^L —n " ^-*" "*'
1202410l 1200134Spectacle
1180509 Beaver Lake0031
130087
* V4X4T V*^\ m V t* i
9 U,,o. \'*w
LARDERLoroVMUNICIPALITY Of LAftDKR LAKf
or MUNNO QUIM* WITTOWN Of LM0IR LA*t -fO *IC |7I b) Of MININ* ACT (JUOH70)
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OP MC OARRYHearst Tp
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUT t No
OTHER ROADSTRAILSSURVEYED LINES
TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES. ETC - LOTS. MINING CLAIMS PARCELS. ETC
UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC t
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -t UTILITY LINfcS -" NON PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS i SUBDIVISION QR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT
" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ...... ..JIM"! P.." 6MINING R I0HTS ONLY . .... . .. .... .. O
LEASE. SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS.. ....— - iP-M^ P" - , SURFACE RIGHTS ONtV.. ..... ., .. ...,.... B" . MININqRIGHTSONLY...-....-.... ——....— ~ B
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION - _ ........,... . L.?..A1 TORDER IN COUNCIL — -...,............... ............ QCRESERVATION . ... ....................,.. (J)CANCELLED _ --........ .. ... . *SAND* GRAVEL .. ..................^... .-..(J)
NOT!: MINIM* HIOMT* IN FAMCtUS PAT*NTKQ rWlOW TO MAY t IfU, VMTfO IN ORIGINAL PATfNTtt "Y THf
.t t*Mbt *er MCO i*?o CMAF MO ate *
SCALE: 1 INCH ' 40 CHAINS
O 1000 7000 4000 6000
O 200 MtTRES 11 KM)
7000(J KM)
TOWNSHIP O
MeVITTIE*M.N.M. AOMINISTRATIVI DISTRICT
KIRKLAND LAKEMINING DIVISION
LARDER LAKELAND TITLIS/ REGISTRY DIVISION
TIMISKAMING
0 f'
Ministryof Natural
\lOntario
Manig*m*nt Snnoh
DATE OF
THE INFORMATION THAT A^EARS ON THIS *AF HAS BEEN COMHiiP* FROM VARIOUS MMMCM. AMD ACCURAOV IS W. QUARANTffO FHOll WISHING TM STAKE Mm ING CLAIMS 9HOHLO OOW SULT WITH THeMININO RECORDgH MINftTftY OF NORTHERN DtVIUOr* MCNT AND MINtt, f Q* AD DITIONAL It FCMMATIQ* ON THE STATUS Of THf LANDS SHOWN HERCGN
•vv
SEPTEMBER 1964 G-3163THWOCT. M.
It. 1994
MN J X*,l**
/J,
200
REFERENCES LEGEND
ARNOLD TPo v. T O a A.\VIM FROM DISPCJ.ITIUN
o. -MINING s R c -SURFACE r
+ S - MINiNG AND SURFACE RIGHTS
Ne P*t* DMMtion Fit*
^•"JHl 894iao|"-j TOWNSre staking Restricted S r ?L t . M -' -' N",', ^. - VI t
• l j_m . -..' "
*) .4.^1*1 'M , W*. ,
~\ r L v ' Z8 ,5iu4,48 ' 2 fio? ^ - ^-xt'-*^^T i I'vO* i rr.ow OF CROWN,——t . -rf" ' '
-gr- -" - Vr*^ V- * /J ' l m*"' /^^. M, * F i'*. * l'."-I" i* *- ' i 0"- 'J. ,-
120034V i T ..
LICENCE 0^ OCCUPATION
i TN \ L ""92ZT ' '^ ''- \ e 4 . , 1
SCALE i INC-i - 40 CM
l , \ * ', * ——— ————'l L \T- .jI "'O ). '(SOJ47!*! usn.'-* Ll * l 99S* * k '*iJ?f-^^i ft ! * i.. .. ^-^^\iU ^^—rJ ^x.rtj
THE INFORM/lriON THATAPPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SUIT WITH THE MINING RECORDER, MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES FOR AD DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON