Top Banner
Root Development in Soils
15

Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Jan 16, 2016

Download

Documents

Opal Ramsey
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Root Development in Soils

Page 2: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort

Page 3: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Root Growth Hypothesis—Profile Rebuilding

• Measure depth and root length density in situ• Frequent measurement can reveal root birth and

death patterns (root turnover)• Soil genesis

Page 4: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Four TreatmentsUndisturbed

Minimum Effort (a.k.a. Builder’s

Special)

Enhanced Topsoil

Profile Rebuilding

4 in (10 cm) topsoil

4 in (10 cm) topsoil, interface scuffed by tilling

Includes compost, subsoiling, and topsoil

Page 5: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Characterizing undisturbed soil

• Shottower Silt Loam

Page 6: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Applying Compost: Profile Rebuilding

Page 7: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Preparing the plots: Pre TreatmentVegetation and topsoil scraped and stockpiled

8 passes with a compactor at

optimal moisture for compaction.

Bulk density = 2.0 g/cm3

Page 8: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Tilling: “Enhanced Topsoil” and “Profile Rebuilding”For the ET and PR treatments, the topsoil was rototilled to a depth of 8 inches (20 cm).

ET: to disrupt interface

PR: to prepare planting surface (eliminate clods)

Page 9: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

• Similar to technique suggested by Kaj Rolf, Swedish researcher

• Can be used in confined spaces (median strips, parking lot islands)

• Addresses subsoil compaction

Subsoiling Technique Step 1: Apply 4 inches leaf litter compost

Step 2: Use backhoe to go down 2 feet, scoop, and allow to fall down to break up clods. Large clods may require a prod with the backhoe. Creates veins of compost deep in profile.

Step 3: Apply 4 inches reserved topsoil

Step 4: Rototill to 8 inch depth

Page 10: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.
Page 11: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Soil Preparation Affects Growth in First Year

Burr Oak Elm First Lady Flowering

Cherry

Red Maple Swamp White Oak

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Enhanced Topsoil

Minimum Effort

Profile Rebuilding

Undisturbed -Check

Aver

age

cros

s-se

ction

al tr

unk

area

incr

ease

dur

ing

year

on

e m

m2

Page 12: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Bur Oak and Elm Canopy after 3 yrs

Soil Treatment

PR UN ME ET

Ca

no

py

m2

0

5

10

15

20

25

Page 13: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Profile Rebuilding

• Short termAids in establishment

• We will be able to quantify how much canopy you get for your investment

• To be determined in the long term– Soil biogenesis– Carbon storage– Root production and depth– Soil water capture

Page 14: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Questions to Pose

• Can we improve soil function for stormwater throughout a city?

• Can trees roots improve drainage from bioretention areas and make underdrainage unnecessary?

Page 15: Root Development in Soils. Root Growth Hypothesis—Minimum Effort.

Partial support provided by the Tree Research & Education Fund