INPE Advanced Course on Compact Objects Course IV: Accretion Processes in Neutron Stars & Black Holes Ron Remillard Kavli Center for Astrophysics and Space Research Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://xte.mit.edu/~rr/inpe_IV.1.ppt
Feb 02, 2016
INPE Advanced Course on Compact Objects
Course IV: Accretion Processes in Neutron Stars & Black Holes
Ron RemillardKavli Center for Astrophysics and Space ResearchMassachusetts Institute of Technology
http://xte.mit.edu/~rr/inpe_IV.1.ppt
Course IV Outline
1. Basic Elements of X-ray Binary Systems
2. Different States of Black-Hole Binaries
3. Weakly Magnetized Neutron-Star Binaries (Atolls and Z sources)
4. Periodic Variability: Orbits and Pulsars
5. Aperiodic Variability: Bursts, Flares & Instability Cycles
IV.1 Basic Elements of X-ray Binary Systems
Introduction X-ray Astronomy: window to hot and violent universe Endpoints of Stellar Evolution Science Goals for Observations of X-ray Binaries
Properties of Neutron Stars and Black Holes Physical Properties Mass Determinations Surveys of Different Types of Compact Objects
Fundamentals of Accretion Physics The Accretion Disk Relativistic Disk Models for Black Holes Non-thermal Radiation Processes Questions for General Relativity
X-ray Photons
Wien’s Displacement Law (1893) (wavelength () of max. energy flux in ()) --- 2 keV is hot !
T = 5 x 107 oK / max (Angstroms)
Wilhelm Carl Werner Otto Fritz Franz Wien
X-rays: Photons 0.6-12 Angstroms Energies 20-1 keV
Thermal Equivalent kT = 4 to 80 million oK Heating mechanisms non-thermal processes
synchrotron radiation (high energy e- in B field)
inverse Compton (photon upscatter by high energy e-)
Window for Astrophysics from Space
Photon transmission
through the Galaxy
X-rays: recover long-distance
view at E > 1 keV
X-ray Telescopes in Space
•Mirrors (grazing incidence) + gratings?
vs. Collimators (metal baffles) + Coded Masks (slit plate + shadows)
•Spectrometers: Semiconductors (Si); gas (Xe); CdZnTe pixels for hard-X
Chandra (NASA Great Observatory)
Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (NASA) XMM-Newton (European Space Agency
Collapsed Remnants of Old Stars
Initial Star Compact Object Support? Observed?
< 8 Mo white dwarf degenerate isolated ; binaries; (0.4-1.3 Mo ; Earth-size) gas pressure cataclysmic
variables
8-25 Mo neutron star strong nuclear force radio pulsars ; hot-
(1.4-2.0 Mo ; R~10 km) isolated; X-ray pulsars; X-ray bursters
> 25 Mo black hole no classical forces accreting binaries
(3-16 Mo ; event horizon) quantum gravity? (X-ray sources)
Milky Way Today: 108-109 BHs ; ~109 NSs ; > 1010 WDs
(Timmes, Woosley & Weaver 1996; Adams and Laughlin 1996)
Collapsed Remnants of Old Stars
Compact Object <Mo> ; <Rcm> GMmR-1 / mc2 Boundary
white dwarf 0.6 ; 6x108 10-4 crash
neutron star 1.4 ; 106 0.2 crash
black hole 10 ; 3x106 0.5 event horizon
Binary Evolution for Accreting Compact Objects
Scenario 1: Roche Lobe overflow• More massive star dies first• Binary separation can shrink
(magnetic braking and/or grav. radiation) • Companion may evolve and grow
Common for Low-Mass (Companion)X-ray Binaries (LMXB)
Scenario 2: Stellar Wind Accretion• More massive star dies first
• Stellar wind captured (with possible inner accretion disk)
Common for High-Mass (Companion)X-ray Binaries (HMXB)
Measuring Masses of Compact ObjectsDynamical study: compact objectx and companion starc
(for binary period, P, and inclination angle, i )
Kepler’s 3rd Law: 4 2 (ax + ac)3 = GP2 (Mx + Mc)
center of mass: Mx ax = Mc ac
radial velocity amplitude Kc = 2 ac sin i P-1
“Mass Function”: f(M) = P K3 / 2G = Mx sin3(i) / (1 + Mc/Mx)2 < Mx
Dynamical Black Hole: Mx > 3 Mo (maximum for a neutron star)
BH Candidates: no pulsations + no X-ray bursts + properties of BHBs
Compact Object Mass
Neutron Star Limit: 3 Mo
(dP/d)0.5 < cRhoades & Ruffini 1974
Chitre & Hartle 1976
Kalogera & Baym 1996
Black Holes (BH)
Mx = 3-18 Mo
Neutron Stars (NS)
(X-ray & radio pulsars)
Mx ~ 1.4 Mo
Transients with Low-Mass Companions: Best Mx
Optical images of A0620-00; BH at 0.9 kpc
quiescence
outburst1975
P K3 / 2G = Mx sin3(i) / (1 + Mc/Mx)2
Optical Study of BH Binary in Quiescence
A0620-00
(X-ray Nova Mon 1975)
f(M) = 2.72 +/- 0.06 Mo
P = 0.323014(1) days
K4V companion
i ~ 60o
Mx = 7 +/- 3 Mo
Optical Study of BHB in Quiescence
Optical Photometry of
Gravity-distorted K4 star
Model( i, fstar , Mc/Mx , Tc, klimb, kgrav)
[residual disk; star spots]
Other techniques: Rotational broadening of
absorption lines Doppler curve of emission
lines (residual disk)
…… worse problems
Inventory of Black Hole Binaries
BH Binary: Mass from binary analyses
BH Candidate: BHB X-ray properties + no pulsations + no X-ray bursts
Dynamical BHBs BH Candidates
Milky Way 18 25
LMC 2 0
local group 1 (M33) (? many ULXs)
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
total 21 25 + ?
Transients 17 23 + ?
Black Holes in the Milky Way
18 BHBs in Milky Way
16 fairly well constrained
(Jerry Orosz)
Scaled, tilted, andcolored for surface temp.
of companion star.
Inventory of Neutron-Star X-ray Sources
Subtype Typical Characteristics Number Transients
Atoll Sources Low-B; LMXBs; X-ray bursts; like BHBs ~100 ~60
Msec X-ray Pulsars 182-599 Hz ; atoll-like X-spectra 8 8
Z-sources high- Lx LMXBs; unique spectral/timing var. 9 1
HMXB or Pulsars hard spectrum + cutoff ; most are X-pulsars ~90 ~50
Magnetars Soft Gama Repeaters (4 + 1 cand.) 14 7
Anomalous X-ray Pul;sars (8 + 1 cand.)
Other Isolated Pulsars young SNRs; X-detect radio pulsars 70? 0?
---------- ---------
Total 291 126
Cataloged radio pulsars number approaching 2000?
X-ray Transients in the Milky Way
RXTE ASM:
47 Persistent Sources > 20 mCrab (1.5 ASM c/s)
80 Galactic Transients(1996-2007; some recurrent)
Transients: timeline of science opportunities.
Science Goals for Observing X-ray Binaries Locate stellar black holes and neutron stars
100% of BHs from X-ray sources ; special applications for X-selected NSs
Measure Physical Properties of Compact Objects Mass (Mx)
Spin NS: pulsations BH: infer a* = cJ / GMx2
BH event horizon compare NS accretion (hard surface) vs. BH (none?)
NS surface B field (<108 to >1015 G)
NS Interior (Eq. of state; burst models ; oscillation modes)
Understand Accretion Physicsorigin of different X-ray states ; accretion disk and Rin ; transient jets ;
hard X-rays (hot Comptonizing corona) ; quasi-periodic oscillations
primary variables: Mx , dM/dt , spin ;
other variables: i, spin, surface B (NS), global B, plasma ?
Accretion Disks and the Inner Disk Boundary
Keplerian Orbits for sample m
E(r)= U+K = 0.5 U(r) = -0.5 G Mx m r -1
Particle dE/dr = 0.5 G Mx m r -2
dL(r) ~ d (dE/dr) = 0.5 G Mx m r -2
dt
dL(r) 2r dr T4 T(r) r -3/4
Real physical model: • conserve angular momentum (viscosity); outflow?, rad. efficiency ()• 3-D geometry (disk thickness, hydrostatic eq., radiative transfer)• B-fields and instabilities• GR effects (Innermost Stable Circular Orbit, grav. redshift, beaming)
Toward a Complete Model of Accretion Disks 1. Shakura & Sunyaev -disk (1973)
• viscosity scales with total pressureshear stress: tr = P (P = Pgas + Prad)
• thin disk: h << R• high radiative efficiency (local L release)
Makishima et al. 1986: apply to obs.T(r) r -3/4 ; L = 4 Rin
2 T4
2. MRI: Magneto-Rotational Instability (Balbus &Hawley 1991)
MHD simulations: plasma eddies with local B, are sheared in a rotating disk;this process transports angular momentum outward.
Continued MHD accretion simulations in General Relativity(e.g. Hawley & Balbus 2002; DeVilliers, Hawley, & Krolik 2003; McKinney & Gammie 2004)
no dissipation (radiation) included in GR MHD simulations, thus far
problem : no independent measure of mass accretion rate
Black Holes: Innermost Stable Circular Orbit (ISCO)
BH spin a*: 0.0 0.5 0.75 0.9 0.98 1.0
-----------------------------------------------------
ISCO (Rg / GMx/c2): 6.0 4.2 3.2 2.3 1.6 1.0
Neutron Stars
Surface (and ? RNS < RISCO ?) Boundary Layer (2nd heat source)
Magnetic Field Affects (Alfven Radius; control of inner accretion flow ;
accretion focus at polar cap pulsars)
Inner Disk Boundary for Accretion Disks
Emissivity vs. Radius in the Accretion Disk
GR Applications for Thermal State
Shakura & Sunyaev 1973; Makishima et al. 1986; Page & Thorne 1974; Zhang, Cui, & Chen 1997Gierlinski et al. 2001; Li et al. 2005
Relativistic Accretion Disk: Spectral Models
GR Applications for Thermal State
e.g. kerrbb in xspecLi et al. 2005; Davis et al. 2005
• Integrate over disk and B(T)
• Correct for GR effects(grav-z, Doppler, grav-focusing)
• Correct for radiative transfer
Method Application Comments
Images impulsive BJB jets two cases (Chandra)
Spectrum Model Continuum accretion disk BH: infer a* if known Mx ; d
Model Hard X-rays hot corona / Comptonization two types: (1) jet ; (2) ???
Spectral Lines BH: broad Fe K-(6.4 keV) corona fluoresces inner disk
emission profile Mx ; a*
‘’ high-ioniz. absorption lines seen in a few BHs
variable, magnetized disk?
‘’ redshifted absorption line 1 NS?: surface grav. redshift
Tools for X-ray Data Analysis
Method Application Comments
Timing Period Search NS: X-ray Pulsars several types; measure dP/dt
and pulse-profiles(E)
‘’ NS or BH binary orbits wind-caused for HMXB
some LMXB eclipsers, dippers
‘’ Long-term Periods precessing disks ;
? slow waves in dM/dt ?
Quasi-Period Oscillations BH and NS rich in detail
low (0.1-50 Hz) common in some states
high (50-1300 Hz) NS: var. ; BH steady harmonics
very slow (10-6 to 10-2 Hz) some BH: disk instability cycles
Tools for X-ray Data Analysis
Method Application Comments
Timing Aperiodic Phenoma
‘’ Type I X-ray Bursts in NS thermonucl. explosions on surface
ID as NS ; oscillations spin ;
infer distance ; physical models improving
‘’ Type II X-ray Bursts two NS cases ; cause ??
‘’ Superbursts (many hours) C detonation in subsurface
? Probe NS interiors
‘’ Giant flares in Magnetars ? crust shifts + B reconnection
Progress?: coordinated timing / spectral analyses
Tools for X-ray Data Analysis
Defining X-ray States in BHB?
Thermal State:
inner accretion disk
X-ray states Lecture IV.2
Searches for the Event HorizonGame: model infall to hard surface (NS) vs. none (BH)
Topic Black Hole Neutron Star Model
Quiescent X-ray State
Measure Lx (erg s-1) 1031 few 1032 advection
Thermonuclear Bursts
Measure rate (at 0.1 LEdd) none 5x10-5 burst model
Thermal X-ray State
X-ray Spectrum max. fdisk > 90% 80% boundary layer
(Narayan 2004 ; Narayan & Heyl 2002; Remillard et al. 2006; Done & Gierlinski 2003)
References: Reviews“Compact Stellar X-ray Sources”, eds. Lewin & van der Klis (2006) ; 16 chapters; some on ‘astro-ph’ preprint server: http://xxx.lanl.gov/form
Overview of Discovery Psaltis astro-ph/0410536
Rapid X-ray Variability van der Klis astro-ph/0410551
X-ray Bursts Strohmayer & Bildsten astro-ph/0301544
Black Hole Binaries McClintock & Remillard astro-ph/0306213
Optical Observations Charles & Coe astro-ph/0308020
Fast Transients, Flashes Heise & in ‘t Zand ---
Isolated Neutron Stars Kaspi, Roberts, & Harding astro-ph/0402136
Jets Fender astro-ph/0303339
Accretion Theory King astro-ph/0301118
Magnetars Wood & Thompson astro-ph/0406133
References: ReviewsOther Reviews:
Remillard & McClintock 2006, "X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries", ARAA, 44, 49
Done. Gierlinski, & Kubota 2007, “Modelling the behaviour of accretion flows in X-ray binaries”, A&A Reviews, in press, astro-ph/07080148
X-ray Binary Catalogs:
(HMXB) Liu, van Paradijs, & van den Heuvel 2006, A&A, 455, 1165
(LMXB) Liu, van Paradijs, & van den Heuvel 2007, A&A, 469, 807