Roles and interplay for industry, academia, governments, financial institutions and civil society in achieving ambitious goals Case studies from Germany October 2020 Prof. Dr.. Manfred Fischedick Scientific Managing Director Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy
20
Embed
Roles and interplay for industry, academia, governments ... · Roles and interplay for industry, academia, governments, financial institutions and civil society in achieving ambitious
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Roles and interplay for industry, academia, governments, financial institutions and civil society in achieving ambitious goalsCase studies from Germany
October 2020
Prof. Dr.. Manfred Fischedick
Scientific Managing Director
Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy
Overview
18/09/20
• Achieving GHG neutrality – related challenges: a complex transformation
process
• Case studies from Germany – examples about how to shape (to contribute
to) the complex transformation pathway and how to trigger technological
and social innovations
Multi-criteria assessment of “Energiewende” technologies: participatory
process to prepare the German Energy Research Program
The Climate Protection Plan Process for North Rhine-Westphalia:
participatory development of an climate protection strategy at state level
IN4Climate.NRW: new forms of cooperation between industry, scientific
community and government
German Japanese Energy Technology Council (GJETC): bundling forces
and exchange knowledge through international cooperation
Achieving GHG neutrality – related challenges: a complex transformation process
GHG neutrality strategies face various major challenges – overcoming challenges
requires more than economic incentives
• Technological challenge (system integration of volatile renewable energy supply,
guaranteeing energy system and grid stability)
• Compatibility challenge (suitable cooperation scheme between conventional and new
technology options, provision of appropriate market structure and investor incentives)
• Infrastructure challenge (further development of appropriate infrastructures: electricity,
district heat, natural gas, hydrogen, CO2)
• Investment challenge (sufficient incentives to steer capital in the necessary direction; cre-
ate willingness to invest – to motivate private sector investments planning reliability is key)
• Stakeholder challenge (overcome persistence forces of established stakeholder, set
appropriate impulses to support structural changes on corporate level)
• Policy challenge (integrated regional, national and international policy initiative needed
(multi-level policy approach); reflective and adaptive policy regime (combination of
appropriate monitoring process with the courage to adapt existing policy regime/measures)
• Social challenge (public perception and societal acceptance of renewable energies and
associated infrastructures)
• Innovation Challenge (system innovations needed - combination of technological
innovations with appropriate mart infrastructures as well as social innovation) -> how to
trigger technological and social innovations
18.09.2020 4
Case studies from Germany – exam-ples about how to shape (to contri-bute to) the complex transformation pathway and how to trigger technological and social innovations
18.09.2020 5
Systematic technology assessment
6 technology sectors with 27 technology fields
1. Renewable energy
2. Conventional power plants
3. Infrastructure (grids, storage)
4. Technologies for sector coupling (PtX)
5. Energy and resource efficient buildings
6. Energy and resource efficient industry
Additionally assessment of
• Systems integration
• Iuk/digitalization
• e-mobility in case of direct links to the energy sector (cars and hybrid trucks)
Multi-criteria assessment of “Energiewende” technologies - participatory process to
prepare the German Energy Research Program
Included technology fields
14_Wuppertal Report | April 2018
Technologien für die Energiewende Politikbericht
Teilprojekt A im Rahmen des strategischen
BMWi-Leitprojekts „Trends und
Perspektiven der Energieforschung“
Peter Viebahn
Ole Zelt
Manfred Fischedick
Jan Hildebrand
Sascha Heib
Daniela Becker
Juri Horst
Martin Wietschel
Simon Hirzel
Unter Mitarbeit von
Sven Neumann
18.09.2020 6
Multi-criteria assessment of “Energiewende” technologies
Set of criteria – step by step assessment process
Quelle: Wuppertal Institut
Step 1: Relevance of public funding
Criterion 1: Lead time Criterion 2: R&D risks(technological, economic, resources)
Step 2: Detailed assessment of the technology field
Summary of the funding relevance
Criterion 3: Market potential
Criterion 4: Contributionto climate goals and otheremission reduction goals
min-max Germany/international
Respectively relative to reference development
Criterion 5: Contributionto energy and resourceefficiency
Cookies helfen uns bei der Bereitstellung unserer Dienste. Durch die Nutzung unserer Diensteerklärst du dich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen.
Mehr erfahren OK
Logos des Ministeriums - Ministerium für Kultur und Wissens …