Top Banner
Surgery for Carcinoma Esophagus Dr L.Anand MS MCh FRCS DNB Associate Professor Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology Madras medical College
54
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Surgery for Carcinoma Esophagus

Dr L.AnandMS MCh FRCS DNB

Associate Professor

Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology

Madras medical College

Page 2: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Management Options

•SURGERY• Chemoradiation

• Radiation

• Sandwich therapy

• Stents

Page 3: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Still undetermined

Paucity of scientific information

Raging debates

________________________

No consensus

Page 4: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Carcinoma Oesophagus

Surgery is the Mainstay

In Resectable Disease!

Page 5: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Issues:

1. Relief of dysphagia

2. Aim towards zero operative mortality

3. Reduced hospital stay and morbidity

4. Better ‘Q O L’

5. Protection against recurrence

6. Prolong survival if possible

Page 6: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

The two ends in Surgery…….

• Transhiatal Oesophagectomy

• En-bloc oesophagectomy with two or three field

lymphadenectomy

Page 7: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Access –OPEN

• Thorax – Abdomen(Iwor Lewis)

• Thorax – Abdomen – Neck(McKeown)

• Thoracoabdominal(Sweet procedure)

• Transhiatal(Orringer)

Page 8: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Access -MAS

• Thoracoscopy & Laparotomy

• Laparoscopy and Thoracotomy

• VATS & Laparoscopy

• Total MIS

Page 9: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

How much clearance?

Axial

Radial

Nodal

Page 11: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

McKeown

Page 12: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus
Page 13: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Mckeown : Neck Anastomosis

Page 14: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Mckeown: Post op

Page 15: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Mckeown: Post op

Page 16: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Trans hiatal Esophagectomy

Page 17: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

THE: Gastric Tubularisation

Page 18: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

THE: Neck Dissection

Page 19: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

THE: Neck Anastomosis

Page 20: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

THE : Specimen

Page 21: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

VATS

Page 22: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Placement of ports

Page 23: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Azygos vein being ligated

Page 24: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Mobilisation of Oesophaguswith tumor

Page 25: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Laparoscopic Mobilisation

Page 26: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Lap mobilisation stomach

Page 27: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Gastric conduit being created

Page 28: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Taking up of conduit

Page 29: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Specimen delivered through the neck

Page 30: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Neck Anastomosis

Page 31: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus
Page 32: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Adjacent organs

• What can be removed ?

–Pleura

–Pericardium

–Diaphragm

–Crura

–Thoracic duct with lymphnodes

Page 33: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Adjacent organs

• What cant be removed?

–Aorta

–Trachea

–Bronchus

–RLN

Page 34: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Lymphadenectomy

• How much to do?– 2 field(mediastinal/abdomen)

– 3 field(mediastinal/abdomen/neck)

Page 35: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Lymphadenectomy

• Number , Region or Both?

Page 36: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

3 F L N D

Adheres to oncological principles

Page 37: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus
Page 38: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

LymphadenectomyAt what expense ?

Morbidity and Mortality

Page 39: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus
Page 40: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Complications - 2 F L N D

n Leak Pulmonary RLN

Injury

Death

Lerut et al. 54 12 11 - 7.4

Nishihara et al. 30 8 13 - 7

Altorki 78 13 24 4 5.1

Fujita 65 11 49 48 3

Page 41: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

T H E Complications

n Year leak R L N Pulmon

aryDeath

Orringer MB 800 2001 13 7 2 4

Gupta 250 1996 15 14 3 6

Tilanus 141 1993 26 16 17 5

Vigneswaran 131 1993 24 12 12 2.3

Page 42: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Q O L ?

Page 43: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Which procedure to choose ?1.THE2.TTE3.MAS

Page 44: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

44 Series 1986-1996

• 2675 THE

• 2808 TTE

No difference in mortality and

long term survival

Simon Law & John Wong, 2001

Page 45: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

• Altorki et al (non randomised trial)

– 4 yr survival – Enbloc esophgectomy

– 37% - TTE vs 11% THE

• Hulscher et al 2002(RCT)

– RCT : TTE vs THE

– 5 yr survival

– TTE: 39% THE: 27% p= 0.08

– MARGINAL STATISCAL SIGNIFICANCE

– Morbidity upto 60% for TTE

Page 46: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Issues for Enbloc Esophgectomy

• Increase time of surgery and anesthesia

• Prolonged Post op ICU Stay

• Length of hospitalisation >14 days

• Morbidity significantly higher

– needs close monitoring with various specialists

• Mortality – similar (TTE vs THE)

• Survival – marginally better

– (Altorki et al and Skinner et al )

• ?QOL

Page 47: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Justification for T H E

Subtotal oesophagectomy possible

Adjacent organ removal

Abdominal and lower mediastinal node removal

(PINOTTI)

Relief of dysphagia

BETTER Q O L

Page 48: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Justification for T H E

Avoiding Thoracotomy

Has it made any difference ?

Hulscher JBF et al. T H E has lower pulmonary complications…

N Eng J Med 2002;347:1662-69

Page 49: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Review of Minimal Access

Page 50: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Palanivelu et al 2006

J Am Coll Surg 2006 Vol :203 (1) : 7 -16

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy : Thoracoscopic

mobilisation of the EsophagusAnd Medicastinal

Lymphadenectomy in prone Position :

Experience of 130 patients

Page 51: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Palanivelu et al 2006

• Respiratory complications: Very minimal

• Anastomotic leak 2.31 %

• Peri- operative mortality 1.54%

• Median Hospital stay : 8Days

• No tracheal/ lung injury

• Stage specific survival was similar

– between open/MAS at 20 months fU

Page 52: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

MAS

• It has potential to replace

other convential type of Eosphagectomies

Page 53: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

To be studied

• RCT for

– THE vs MAS

– TTE vs MAS

Page 54: Role of Surgery in CA Oesophagus

Thank you