Top Banner
Lecture 9: Robust Design Spanos EE290H F05 1 Robust Design A New Definition of Quality. The Signal-to-Noise Ratio. Orthogonal Arrays.
31
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

1

Robust Design

A New Definition of Quality.The Signal-to-Noise Ratio.Orthogonal Arrays.

Page 2: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

2

The Taguchi Philosophy

Quality is related to the total loss to society due to functional and environmental variance of a given productQuality is related to the total loss to society due to functional and environmental variance of a given product

Taguchi's method focuses on Robust Design through use of:• S/N Ratio to quantify quality• Orthogonal Arrays to investigate quality

Taguchi starts with a new definition of Quality:

Page 3: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

3

Meeting the specs vs. hitting the target

better quality worse quality

mm-5 m+5

Page 4: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

4

Quadratic Loss Function:

L(y) = k (y - m)2

Fig 2.3 pp 18 fromQuality Engineering Using Robust Design

by Madhav S. PhadkePrentice Hall 1989

Page 5: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

5

Quadratic Loss Function on Normal Distribution

Average quality loss due to µ and σ:

Fig 2.5 pp 26

E(Q) = k [(µ-m) + σ ] 2 2

Page 6: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

6

Exploiting non-linearity:

Fig 2.6 pp 28

Page 7: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

7

Parameters are classified according to function:

Fig 2.7 pp 30

Page 8: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

8

Orthogonal Arrays

b = (XTX)-1XTy V(b) = (XTX)-1σ2

During Regression Analysis, an orthogonal arrangement of the experiment gave us independent model parameter estimates:

Orthogonal arrays have the same objective:For every two columns all possible factor combinations occur equal times.

L4(23) L9(34) L12(211) L18(21 x 37)

Page 9: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

9

Simple CVD experiment for defect reductionmax n = -10 log (MSQ def)

10

Page 10: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

10

Simple CVD experiment for defect reduction (cont)

Using the L9 orthogonal array:

Page 11: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

11

Estimation of Factor Effects (ANOM)

m = 19 η1+η2+η3+...+η9

mA1 = 13 η1+η2+η3

mA2 = 13 η4+η5+η6

mA3 = 13 η7+η8+η9...

mB2 = 13 η2+η5+η8...

mD3 = 13 η3+η4+η8

η Ai,Bj,Ck,Dl = μ+αi+βj+γk+δl+eαi = 0Σ βi = 0Σ γi = 0Σ δi = 0Σ

Page 12: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

12

Analysis of CVD defect reduction experiment

Fig 3.1 pp 46Tab 3.4 pp 55

Page 13: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

13

ANOVA for CVD defect reduction experiment

Grand total sum of squares: ηi2 = 19,425 (dB)2Σi=1

9

Total sum of squares: ηi-m 2 = 3,800 (dB)2Σi=1

9

Sum of squares due to mean: m2 = 15,625 (dB)2Σi=1

9

Sum of squares due to error: ei2 = ??? (dB)2Σi=1

9

Sum of squares due to A: 3 mAi-m 2 = 2,450 (dB)2Σi=1

3

Page 14: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

14

ANOVA for CVD defect reduction experiment (cont)

Page 15: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

15

Estimation of Error Variance

The experimental error is estimated from the ANOVA residuals.

It is then used to estimate the error of the effects and to determine their significance at the 5% level.

Page 16: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

16

Confirmation ExperimentOnce the optimum choice has been made, it is tested by performing a confirmation run.This run is used to "validate" the model as well as confirm the improvements in the process.

Variance of prediction (for the model)

σpred2 = σe2n0

+ σe2nr

This gives us +/-2σ limits on the confirmation experiment.

1n0

σe2 = 1n + 1

nA 1 - 1n + 1

nB1 - 1n σe2

Page 17: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

17

The additive model

Fig 3.3 pp 63, enlarged 120%

Since we assumed additive model, we must make sure that there are no interactions:

Page 18: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

18

Example: Large CVD experiment.

Objectives:

a) reduce defects n = -10 log (MSQ Def)

b) maximize S/N of rate n'= 10 log (µ / σ )

c) adjust poly thickness to a 3600 Å target.

10

102 2

Page 19: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

19

Choosing the Control Factors

Tab 4.6-7 pp 88-90

Page 20: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

20

Using the L18 orthogonal array...

Tab 4.3 pp 78, enlarged 120%

Page 21: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

21

Data summary for large CVD experiment:

Tab 4.5 pp 85, enlarged 120%

Page 22: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

22

Data analysis for large CVD experiment (cont)

Fig 4.5 pp 86, enlarged 120%

Page 23: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

23

ANOVA table for large CVD experiment: η

Page 24: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

24

ANOVA table for large CVD experiment : η’

Page 25: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

25

ANOVA tables for large CVD experiment: η’’

Page 26: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

26

Combined Prediction Using the Additive Model

Tab 4.6-7 pp 88-90

Page 27: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

27

Verification for large CVD experiment

Tab 4.10-11 pp 92

for further reading: Quality Engineering Using Robust Design by Madhav S. PhadkePrentice Hall 1989

Page 28: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

28

“Inner” and “Outer” Arrays

• Often one want to improve performance based on some “control”factors, in the presence of some “noise” factors.

• Two arrays are involved: the inner array explores the “control”factors, and the entire experiment is repeated across an array of the noise factors.

• Inner arrays are typically orthogonal designs• Outer arrays are typically small, 2-level fractional factorial designs.

Page 29: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

29

Why use S/N Ratios?

• They lead to an optimum through a monotonic function.

• They help improve additivity of the effects.

⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎝

⎛−=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛−=

ii

STB

i iLTB

YnN

S

YnNS

sY

NS

2

2

2

2

1log10

11log10

log10Nominal is best:

Larger is better:

Smaller is better:

Page 30: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

30

Taguchi vs. RSM

Taguchi RSMSmall number of runs Explicit control of InteractionsEngineering Intuition Statistical Intuition“Complete” package Training IssuesAdditive Models More General ModelsOrthogonal Arrays Fractional FactorialsA “Philosophy” A Tool

Page 31: Robust Design

Lecture 9: Robust Design

SpanosEE290H F05

31

Design of Experiments Comparison of Treatments Blocking and Randomization Reference Distributions ANOVA MANOVA Factorial Designs Two Level Factorials Blocking Fractional Factorials Regression Analysis Robust Design

Analysis

Modeling