Alex van der Linden [email protected] Road to Change Management in Teamcenter Room 3 (Foyer 1) PLM Europe / 25-Oct-2017 10:30-11:30 / Berlin PLM Solution Architect
Feb 25, 2019
Alex van der Linden
Road to Change Management
in Teamcenter
Room 3 (Foyer 1)
PLM Europe / 25-Oct-2017 10:30-11:30 / Berlin
PLM Solution Architect
Survey Question 126 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 2
powered by kahoot.com
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Customer Integrator / reseller I am a Siemens PLM employee Other
What is your relation to Siemens PLM?
• ASML Introduction
• Configuration Management
• Application Landscape
• The step to the future
• Challenges
• Process vs Functionality
Agenda
26 October 2017
Public
Slide 3
ASML Introduction
26 October 2017
Public
Slide 4
It’s hard to imagine a world without chips26 October 2017
Slide 5
Public
More than 200 billion ICs are made every year26 October 2017
Slide 6
Data: WSTS
In 2015, 230 billion
ICs were produced —
30 for every man,
woman and child on
the planet.
Global semiconductor
industry sales were
$335 billion.
0
50
100
150
200
250
199
1
199
2
1993
199
4
199
5
1996
199
7
199
8
1999
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
IC units, in billions
Public
ASML makes the machines for making those chips
• All of the world’s top chip makers are
our customers
• More than 16,000 employees (FTE)
worldwide
• Annual results 2016:
• Net sales: € 6,895 mln.
• R&D investments: € 1,106 mln.
• Average selling price: € 29 mln.
26 October 2017
Slide 7
Public
26 October 2017
Slide 8
Public
Video about ASML
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq852vTfY2o
26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 9
Current Teamcenter @ ASML
• Teamcenter 10.1 – AWC 3.2 – NX 11
• Multi-site setup
• Netherlands (headquarters), United States (2x), Asia
• 10.000 active Teamcenter users (login within last three months)
• ~ 1500 NX users
• ~ 4000 Document creators
• ~ 4500 Viewers
• Clients:
• Desktop (TC Portal)
• Active Workspace (NL only; search docs only)
26 October 2017
Slide 10
Public
Configuration Management
26 October 2017
Slide 11
Public
Survey Question 226 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 12
powered by kahoot.com
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes, but we don't use it I've heard of it Never heard of CMII
Do you know CMII?
ASML: Implement CMII Closed Loop Change ProcessCM = Configuration Management
26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 13
• Close Loop Change Process
• CMII best practice
• ASML Objectives:
• Minimize corrective
actions/rework
• Cost and planning of
changes in control
• ASML Solution
• Implement CMII Closed
Loop Change Process
CMII @ ASML – Change Specialists26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 14
• We started with CSII and
CSIII (time-to-market is
paramount for ASML)
• Daily standup ‘Change
Tracker’ to discuss the
process of change &
landscape of changes over
all projects
• Major support by upper
management
CMII @ ASML – Document Impact Analysis26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 15
• Conduct cross-sectoral
impact analysis before
change approval
• Document Impact
Analysis (DIA)
• Main deliverable: DIA-BOM
• Document impact on the
BOM showing complete
planned impact
• Currently done outside
Teamcenter
Application Landscapepast – current – future
26 October 2017
Slide 16
Public
SAP Production
1997 Introduction of Teamcenter & SAP26 October 2017
Slide 18
Teamcenter
• Teamcenter: the central part database for Design Engineering
• SAP: the central part database for Manufacturing
Public
26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 19
2003 Introduction of ZECN ZECN = custom build SAP transaction
26 October 2017
Slide 20
Teamcenter SAP Production
SAP
ZECN
Change
• ZECN enables a controlled entry of part changes in SAP
including review possibilities.
Public
26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 21
2008 Automated Part Interface Teamcenter-ZECN26 October 2017
Slide 22
Teamcenter SAP Production
SAP
ZECN
Change
• Part release in Teamcenter is coupled with an automated interface to
ZECN in order to improve data consistency.
Public
26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 23
Future Change Management in Teamcenter & SAP26 October 2017
Slide 24
Teamcenter SAP Production
SAP
Change Mgt
ChangeChange
• Change Management in Teamcenter enables a change-controlled way-of-working including review of the part data before releasing it to SAP.
• Change Management in SAP opens many standard SAP possibilities, like using effectivity.
Change
Public
The step to the future
26 October 2017
Slide 25
Public
Teamcenter SAP
ZECN
EC 789
Current Situation26 October 2017
Slide 26
Part 456
Part 123 Review
&
Logistic
Enrichment
SAP
Prod.
Effectuate
Part 456
EC 789
Part Release
Part 123
EC 789
Part Release
Public
Part Release
Part Release
Teamcenter
ECN 789
SAP
Change Mgt
ER 789
Part 456
Part 123
ECN
Release
Future Situation26 October 2017
Slide 27
Part 456
Part 123
Logistic
Enrichment
SAP
Prod.
Review Effectuate
Public
Teamcenter SAP
Facilitate both: new WoW + old WoW26 October 2017
Slide 28
Non ECN-Based
Parts
ECN-Based Parts
Parts
Review
Review
PartsECN Release
Part ReleaseOld
WoW
New
WoW
Public
Change Management in Teamcenter – Overview
• Teamcenter Change Management = PR + ECR + ECN
• We will start using only ECN
• Within the ECN we’ll use:
• Impacted Items
• Solution Items
• Reference Items
26 October 2017
Slide 29
Problem Report Change Request Change Notice
X √X
ECN
Impacted Items
Solution Items
Old Parts
New Parts
Reference Items
Supporting Docs
Public
Change Management in Teamcenter – Screenshot26 October 2017
Slide 30
Public
Survey Question 3 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 31
powered by kahoot.com
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Yes No No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a.
Are you using the Change Management module in Teamcenter?
Challenges
26 October 2017
Slide 32
Public
Site consolidation
• Currently 4 Teamcenter sites
• Support needed for real Global Change Management
• Consolidate to 1 Teamcenter site (Veldhoven, NL)
26 October 2017
Slide 33
San Diego
Linkou
WiltonVeldhoven
Public
CMII: As-Planned/As-Released Baseline
• CMII uses As-Planned/As-Released
Baseline for implementing ECNs
• Multi-level overview of planned
changes on an end-item
• Teamcenter doesn’t provide such
multi-level overview.
• How to plan a new item (revision)
without creating it in Teamcenter?
• Our Solution: Plan new item(rev)s
outside Teamcenter
26 October 2017
Slide 34
Public
CMII: Creator/User
• CMII uses Creator/User principle
• Every document (including BoM) has a creator and designated user
• Current Teamcenter configuration at ASML:
• Multiple datasets (= documents) within an Item Revision
• Challenge:
• TC Workflows needed to support Creator/User
• Siemens: Execute TC Workflows on Item Revisions, not Datasets
• Our plan:
• Consider all NX-data and BOM as ‘one document’
• Configure Non-NX dataset as separate Document Item(rev)
26 October 2017
Slide 35
Public
Survey Question 4 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 36
powered by kahoot.com
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No I don't know / n.a.
Are you using the Creator/User principle?
Review of a change in Teamcenter (1/2)
• Showing the delta is essential when reviewing a change
• Teamcenter does not provide this OOTB (Out of the Box)
• Custom reports to be created showing deltas on
• BOM-lines: which components have been added/removed/updated
• Attributes: which attributes have been updated
• Documents: which documents have been updated
26 October 2017
Slide 37
ECN
Impacted Items
Solution Items
Old Parts
New Parts
Delta
Public
Review of a change in Teamcenter (2/2)
• Challenges when using Teamcenter OOTB reporting framework:
• Customization needed for useful / advanced reporting features
• Current review facilitated by ZECN tool (to be phased-out).
• ZECN provide rich reports, like showing changes in context of the
item hierarchy (see below). Can we level-up?
26 October 2017
Slide 38
Public
Concurrent Engineering / Unincorporated Changes
• At ASML, concurrent engineering is very common
• Current WoW in Teamcenter @ ASML: Support by allowing multiple
non-released revisions
• Siemens advise: Do not allow multiple non-released revisions
• Teamcenter provides functionality “Unincorporated Changes”
• Which companies are using this?
26 October 2017
Slide 39
Public
Item
rev
Arev
Brev
C
Survey Question 5 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 40
powered by kahoot.com
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Yes No, but we have challenges withconcurrent engineering.
No. Concurrent engineering is notan issue for us.
I don't know / n.a.
Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes functionality?
Item Disposition
• When defining a product change, parts are typically replaced.
• Item Disposition specifies how to dispose physical parts that are
currently being used.
• Example values: Scrap, Rework, Use As Is
• ASML currently has customized Teamcenter to handle this.
• This customization gives conflicts when using ECN functionality
• Siemens has new OOTB capability to handle this.
• Available in AWC 3.3
26 October 2017
Slide 41
Public
Survey Question 6 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 42
powered by kahoot.com
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No I don't know / n.a.
Do you define Item Disposition?
Supersedures & BOM Changes
• Teamcenter Change Manager provides functionalities:
• Supersedures
• BOM Changes
• We plan not to use these
• Do you?
26 October 2017
Slide 43
Public
Survey Question 7 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 44
powered by kahoot.com
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Yes No I don't know / n.a.
Are you using the Supersedure functionality in Teamcenter?
Process vs Functionality
26 October 2017
Slide 45
Public
ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality
Process 26 October 2017
Slide 46
ASML Process
Public
ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality
Configure Teamcenter 26 October 2017
Slide 47
ASML Process
TC OOTB
Public
ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality
Add Customizations 26 October 2017
Slide 48
ASML Process
TC OOTB
& Customizations
Public
ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality
Update ASML Process 26 October 2017
Slide 49
ASML Process
TC OOTB
& Customizations
Public
ASML Process & Teamcenter Functionality
Alternative Process Less Customization 26 October 2017
Slide 50
ASML Process
TC OOTB
& Customizations
Public
Summary
26 October 2017
Slide 51
Public
Summary26 October 2017
Slide 52
CMII @ ASMLChange Management Improvement
Process vs Functionality Mapping
DCR
Work Copies
Order History
Re
co
rd
Revision History
Repository for
Released
Information
Ba
se
line
PR
ECR
Technical Review by
Creator
Complex Change (full track)
Simple Change (fast track)
Cost Estimate
Change Specialist I
ECR +
Impl. Plan
Deviations
Modification
Authorizations
Deviations
Work
Authorizations
Business Decision &
Priority
By CRB
By Creator
ECN +
Impl. Plan
CIB
Impl. Plan
Change Specialist IV Change Specialist II
ECNFCN
Validate document
MCN
MCRValidate manual
By User
Change Specialist IIIRelease
Upgrade documentUpgrade manual
By Creator
Public
Implementation Challenges
Survey Question 8 26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 53
powered by kahoot.com
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
:) :| :(
What do you think about this presentation?
Survey – Detailed Results (1/2)26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 54
Players Email address Domain / CompanyWhat is your relation to
Siemens PLM?Do you know CMII?
Are you using the
Change Management
module in Teamcenter?
Are you using the
Creator/User principle?
Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes
functionality?
Do you define Item
Disposition?
Are you using the
Supersedure
functionality in
Teamcenter?
Per [email protected] akerrolutions.com Yes, but not in Teamcenter
MROM [email protected] asml.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No, but we're planning to No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
T. Center [email protected] asmpt.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it Yes No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Ramon [email protected] atos.net Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Frank [email protected] atos.net Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Paiste [email protected] avasis.biz Integrator / reseller Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Raak [email protected] daftrucks.com Customer I've heard of it I don't know / n.a. No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Kardyb [email protected] danfoss.com Yes, but we don't use it No Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter No
Lars T [email protected] danfoss.com Customer Never heard of CMII No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No
Dan Foss [email protected] danfoss.com Customer Never heard of CMII I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. Yes, but not in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
HLD [email protected] digitread.com Integrator / reseller Yes, but we don't use it No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Jannes [email protected] dvna.nl Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter No
Jeannette [email protected] ecs-gmbh.de Integrator / reseller Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Nico [email protected] edf.fr Customer Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
AT [email protected] ford.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
PLME [email protected] fraenkische.de Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Anders [email protected] gknaerospace.com Customer I've heard of it No, but we're planning to Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Clabo [email protected] gknaerospace.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. No No
Kish [email protected] gknaerospace.com Customer Never heard of CMII No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Hunter [email protected] gknaerospace.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it
Manni [email protected] hemle.de Yes No No No
JS [email protected] its-plm.si Integrator / reseller I've heard of it No No No
PNOV [email protected] lighting.com No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Oz [email protected] lighting.com Customer No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Maxplus [email protected] mahle.com No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a.
Tamara [email protected] mail.weir Customer I've heard of it No, but we're planning to No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Phil [email protected] mt.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No Yes, in Teamcenter No No
Chandra [email protected] mt.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
OleW [email protected] nexans.com Customer I've heard of it No No No
Jt [email protected] nexans.com Customer Never heard of CMII No, but we're planning to I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
Kevin [email protected] oce.com Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Wojtek [email protected] pg.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
ToHo [email protected] pg.com Customer Never heard of CMII Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
PLM’ist [email protected] polar.com Other Yes Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Stefan [email protected] siemens.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Yes, we are using it (partly) Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
Survey – Detailed Results (2/2)26 October 2017
Confidential
Slide 55
Players Email address Domain / CompanyWhat is your relation to
Siemens PLM?Do you know CMII?
Are you using the
Change Management
module in Teamcenter?
Are you using the
Creator/User principle?
Are you using the Unincorporated-Changes
functionality?
Do you define Item
Disposition?
Are you using the
Supersedure
functionality in
Teamcenter?
Mark [email protected] siemens.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it I don't know / n.a. No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Marcel [email protected] siemens.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Yes, but we don't use it Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No I don't know / n.a.
J@rda [email protected] siemens.com Customer Yes Yes, in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a. Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Marc [email protected] siemens-healthineers.com Other Never heard of CMII Yes Yes, in Teamcenter Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
PC [email protected] siemens-healthineers.com I am a Siemens PLM employee Never heard of CMII Yes No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Yagiz [email protected] stm.com.tr Customer No, but we're planning to No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Whale [email protected] teploobmennik.ru Customer No Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
waltervl [email protected] vdletg.com Customer Yes, but we don't use it No, but we're planning to No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, in Teamcenter I don't know / n.a.
Billy [email protected] ventum.de Other I've heard of it No No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Clemens [email protected] volkswagen.de No, but we're planning to Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Piet [email protected] wartsila.com Customer Yes, in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
Johan [email protected] wartsila.com Yes, but we don't use it Yes I don't know / n.a. No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us.
Themousr Customer Never heard of CMII No No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
PJ Customer Never heard of CMII No No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Ian Customer I've heard of it No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
J. Hetfield Customer Yes, we are using it (partly) No, but we're planning to No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
JSp Yes No No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
mike No I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
Timo Customer No No No
Act Yes, but not in Teamcenter No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
TI No No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. No No
Simon Customer Never heard of CMII No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Andrew2 No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. Yes, but not in Teamcenter No
J Yes Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Say I don't know / n.a. No, but we have challenges with concurrent engineering. No No
change master Yes, in Teamcenter Yes
Andrew Customer Yes, but we don't use it Yes
Timo2 No No
Change master Customer Never heard of CMII Yes
Z I don't know / n.a. No No
Ewan Yes, in Teamcenter No. Concurrent engineering is not an issue for us. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Musicbert Customer Never heard of CMII No
Duke Nukem I don't know / n.a. No I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a. I don't know / n.a.
Muskalla Yes
Uwpic Customer
If you know any missing
email addresses,
please let me know.
- Alex
Have questions or feedback afterwards?
Please mail me: [email protected]