Risk Management Hedging with Swaps 1 Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Dec 23, 2015
Risk Management Hedging with Swaps
1
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Terminology, Conventions and Market Quotes
Fixed-Rate payer Pays fixed rate in the swap Receives floating rate in the swap Is considered the buyer of a swap Is long a swap; but Has entered into a short hedge
• Why?• You are E(i) to increase (want to be paying the FR);
therefore, Prices to decrease. Has constructed a position with the price
sensitivities of a longer-term liability and a floating-rate asset (ST Asset funded by a LT liability)
2
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Terminology, Conventions and Market Quotes
Floating-Rate payer Pays floating rate in the swap Receives fixed rate in the swap Is considered the seller of a swap Is short a swap; but Has entered into a long hedge
• Why?• You are E(i) to decrease (want to be paying the VR);
therefore, Prices to increase. Has constructed a position with the price
sensitivities of a longer-term asset and a floating-rate liability (LT Asset funded by a ST liability)
3
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking4
Plain Vanilla Interest Rate Swap
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Plain Vanilla Swap:Interest Rate Debt or Revenue Swap
Involves periodic exchange of fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments No actual transfer of principal, only interest payments on debt or
investment/loan contracts. Useful in managing interest rate gap problems in FIs
BEFORE SWAP
Firm 1Fixed rate assetsVariable rate liabilities
Firm 2Variable rate assetsFixed rate liabilities
AFTER SWAP
Firm 1Fixed rate assetsFixed rate liabilities
Firm 2Variable rate assetsVariable rate liabilities
5
Concerned if interest rates decrease
Concerned if interest rates increase
Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
Town Bank and Country Bank have the following opportunities for borrowing in the
short-term (floating rate) and long-term (fixed rate) markets:
Town Bank Country Bank
Floating Rate T-bill + 1.0% T-bill + 2.0%
Fixed Rate 8% 10.5%
Town Bank has a positive gap and Country Bank has a negative gap.
1. Show how both banks can benefit from a swap in the sense of lowering their interest rate risk and their cost of funds. Assume any potential savings is split ⅔ to Town and ⅓ to Country.
2. Based upon your swap construction in #1, what is the net payover amount (in $) for the next 4 years given the following information:
Notional amount = $1,000,000
T-bill rates:
Year 1 = 6%; Year 2 = 8%; Year 3 = 3%; Year 4 = 10%
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
6
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
1.a) Need the opposite regarding desired payments
1.b) Need savings potential
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
7
Given:
ISGAP is: Receive PayCountry Bank Negative: ISA<ISL
Town Bank Positive: ISA>ISL
Therefore Bank wants to:
L-T / FR S-T / VRCountry Bank 10.50% T + 2.0%Town Bank 8.00% T + 1.0%Premium Difference
Savings
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
1.c) LT premium > ST premium (usually is the required case)
So, YES a swap is possible between the two parties!
2.a) Allocate potential savings between the two parties. Assume any potential savings is split ⅔ to Town and ⅓ to Country.
Savings to Town: ⅔ x 1.50% = 1.00%
Savings to Country: ⅓ x 1.50% = 0.50%
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
8
L-T / FR S-T / VRCountry Bank 10.50% T + 2.0%Town Bank 8.00% T + 1.0%Premium Difference 2.50% 1.00% 1.50%
Savings>
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
2.b) Construct the Swap
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
9
1 (want LT) (want ST)Country Bank Town Bank
5 Borrow ST Borrow LT6 Pay FR Receive FR7 Receive VR Pay VR4 Costs w/ swap3 Costs w/o swap2 Savings
Swap Terms
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
2.c) Determine Payover rate, and who pays whom and when.
Payover rate = FR – VR under terms of the swap.
Payover rate = 8.00% - T%
If T ____ 8%; a wash
If T ____ 8%; Town pays Country: (T% - 8%) x Notional Amount
If T ____ 8%; Country pays Town: (8% - T%) x Notional Amount
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
10
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing an Interest Rate Debt Swap
What is the net payover amount (in $) for the next 4 years given the following information:
Notional amount = $1,000,000
T-bill rates:
Year 1 = 6%; Year 2 = 8%; Year 3 = 3%; Year 4 = 10%
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking11
Notional Amount= $1,000,000Year T-bill rate Net Payover Who pays Whom Amount
1 6% T < 8% Country pays Town = (8%-6%) x $1,000,000 =2 8% T = 8% a wash3 3% T < 8% Country pays Town = (8%-3%) x $1,000,000 =4 10% T > 8% Town pays Country = (10%-8%)x$1,000,000 =
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking12
Variable-Rate Payments at LIBOR + ½%
Fixed-Rate Payments at 9½%
Investors inFixed-Rate
Bonds Issuedby Quality Co.
Risky Co.Quality Co.
Fixed-RatePaymentsat 9%
Investors in Variable-RateBonds Issuedby Risky Co.
Variable-RatePayments
at LIBOR + 1%• Borrower with lower credit rating
pays fixed payments of borrower with higher credit rating, while
• Borrower with higher credit rating pays short-term floating rate of borrower with lower credit rating
Plain Vanilla Swap #2Quality Interest Rate Swap
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking13
Example: Analyzing & Constructing a Quality Interest Rate Swap
Risky Bank can borrow short-term at Prime + 1.75% and long-term at 11.50%. Safe Bank can borrow short-term at Prime and long-term at 9%.
Risky Bank wants to borrow long-term, but feels their long-term rate is too expensive. Safe Bank wants to borrow short-term and is always looking for a way to lower its short-term borrowing rate.
1. Could a swap be constructed between Risky and Safe Bank that would be advantageous to both? If so, how? What would be the potential savings?
2. Construct a swap. Assume any potential savings is split 2/3 to Risky Bank and 1/3 to Safe Bank.
3. What is the net payover rate and who will pay whom?
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking14
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing a Quality Interest Rate Swap
Given: Need the opposite
LT rate ST rate Receive Pay (Debt)Safe Bank 9.00% P%Risky Bank 11.50% P + 1.75%
Therefore Bank wants to
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking15
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing a Quality Interest Rate Swap (cont.)
1. Safe & Risky
A swap IS possible. Safe and Risky want the opposite, thereis a potential savings, and the LT premium is > than the ST premium.
L-T/Fixed rates S-T/Variable ratesRisky Bank 11.50% P + 1.75%Safe Bank 9.00% P%
Savings
>
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking16
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing a Quality Interest Rate Swap (cont.)
2.1) (want LT) (want ST)
Risky Bank Safe Bank5) Borrow ST Borrow LT6) Pay FR Receive FR7) Receive VR Pay VR4) Costs w/ swap3) Costs w/o swap2) Savings
Assume savings split is 1/3 to Safe and 2/3 to Risky.
Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking17
Solution to Example: Analyzing & Constructing a Quality Interest Rate Swap (cont.)
3. Payover rate = FR - VR = 9% - (P-0.25%) = 9.25% - PIf P = 9.25%, a washIf P > 9.25%, Safe pays Risky P% - 9.25%If P < 9.25%, Risky pays Safe 9.25% - P%
Regulation
The Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have implemented uniform guidelines that require banks to: establish internal guidelines regarding hedging activity establish trading limits disclose large contract positions that materially affect the risk to
shareholders and outside investors As of 2000 the FASB requires all firms to reflect the marked-to-market
value of their derivatives positions in their financial statements Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, swap markets were governed by relatively
little regulation—except indirectly at FIs through bank regulatory agencies
The Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have implemented uniform guidelines that require banks to: establish internal guidelines regarding hedging activity establish trading limits disclose large contract positions that materially affect the risk to
shareholders and outside investors As of 2000 the FASB requires all firms to reflect the marked-to-market
value of their derivatives positions in their financial statements Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, swap markets were governed by relatively
little regulation—except indirectly at FIs through bank regulatory agencies
18 Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking
Regulation
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 requires most OTC derivatives to be exchange-traded to ensure performance by all parties
The act also requires OTC derivatives be regulated by the SEC and/or the CFTC
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 requires most OTC derivatives to be exchange-traded to ensure performance by all parties
The act also requires OTC derivatives be regulated by the SEC and/or the CFTC
19 Copyright 2014 Diane Scott Docking