ASEAN R i lRi k A t S i W kh ASEAN Regional Risk Assessment Scoping Workshop Bangkok, Thailand 11-12 October 2011 Risk Assessment and Its Role in Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Risk Reduction and Emergency Management Dr Heather Bell Science Advisor In Collaboration with the ASEAN-UNISDR Dr . Heather Bell, Science Advisor Pacific Disaster Center 1305 N. Holopono St., Suite 2 Kihei, Hawaii 96753 http://www.pdc.org In Collaboration with the ASEAN UNISDR Technical Cooperation
18
Embed
Risk Assessment and its Role in Disaster Risk Reduction and Emergency Management (Heather Bell)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ASEAN R i l Ri k A t S i W k hASEAN Regional Risk Assessment Scoping WorkshopBangkok, Thailand11-12 October 2011
Risk Assessment and Its Role in Disaster Risk Reduction and EmergencyRisk Reduction and Emergency
Management
Dr Heather Bell Science Advisor In Collaboration with the ASEAN-UNISDRDr. Heather Bell, Science AdvisorPacific Disaster Center1305 N. Holopono St., Suite 2Kihei, Hawaii 96753http://www.pdc.org
In Collaboration with the ASEAN UNISDR Technical Cooperation
People CenteredDRR and RVADRR and RVA
A Basic Approach to DRR
A k l d Ri kAcknowledge RiskAssess Risk
Add Ri kAddress RiskCommunicate Risk
How Does RVA Support DRR and EM?
• Makes idea of risk more
DRR and EM?
Acknowledge
tangible• Helps stakeholders
understand patterns of riskRgRisk
understand patterns of risk and potential consequences
• Identifies gaps and A Ri k
RecoveryMitigation
Assess Risk
Communicate Risk
Address Risk
“hotspots”• Increases effectiveness of
DM activities
Assess Risk
PreparednessAddress Risk DM activities• Aids prioritization and goal
setting
ResponsePreparedness
• Provides evidence for decision making
Risk Assessment in the ARPDM
Sub-Component 2.2.a: Specialized Training in Risk, Damage d d A
Building better risk assessment capacity will help ASEAN
and Needs Assessment
Member Countries to better respond to and mitigate natural disaster risks…Risk assessment requires multi-disciplinary teams to quantify and evaluate hazards vulnerability andteams to quantify and evaluate hazards, vulnerability and capacities. Systematic assessment of risks is a key input to preparedness and mitigation, planning and other aspects of d i i kidecision making.
Risk is characterized as a function of Hazard Vulnerability and Capacity;Risk is characterized as a function of Hazard, Vulnerability, and Capacity; Risk and vulnerability assessments
contribute to DRR and EM decision making
Risk Assessment Roadmap
Purpose, Goals, and Objectives of Risk Assessmentp , , j
AADMER and the Hyogo Framework for ActionFramework for Action
The Parties to this Agreement,
RECALLING ALSO th H D l ti d th
g
…RECALLING ALSO the Hyogo Declaration and the Hyogo Framework for Action set out by the World Conference on Disaster Reduction in January 2005, which, among others, stress the need to strengthen and when necessary develop co-ordinated regional approaches, and create or upgrade regional policies, operationalcreate or upgrade regional policies, operational mechanisms, plans and communication systems to prepare for and ensure rapid and effective disaster response in situations that exceed national coping capacitiessituations that exceed national coping capacities
Summary of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-
20152015www.unisdr.org
Summary of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-
20152015
For Implementation and Follow-up, Regional Organizations
• Promoting regional programmes for technical cooperation,
Are Tasked with:
g g p g p ,capacity development, development of methodologies and standards for hazard and vulnerability monitoring and assessment, information sharing, and effective mobilization of resourcesg,
• Undertaking and publishing regional and sub-regional baseline assessments
• Coordinating and publishing reviews on progress and support• Coordinating and publishing reviews on progress and support needs, and assisting countries in preparation of national summaries
• Establishing specialized regional collaborative centers• Supporting the development of regional mechanisms and
capacities for early warning, including for tsunami
AADMER Part I
Article 2:
The objective of this Agreement is to provide effective mechanisms to achieve substantial reduction of disaster losses in lives and in the social economic and environmental assets of the Parties and tosocial, economic and environmental assets of the Parties, and to jointly respond to disaster emergencies through concerted national efforts and intensified regional and international co-operation. This h ld b d i th ll t t f t i bl d l tshould be pursued in the overall context of sustainable development
and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
Article 3.1:
The Parties shall give priority to prevention and mitigation, and thus shall take precautionary measures to prevent, monitor and mitigate disasters.
AADMER Part II: Risk Identification and Monitoring
1 Identify Disaster Risks Covering:
Identification and Monitoring
1. Identify Disaster Risks, Covering:• Natural and Human Induced Hazards• Risk Assessment• Monitoring of Vulnerabilities• Disaster Management Capacities
2 Ri k L l B d A d C i i2. Risk Levels Based on Agreed Criteria 3. Communicate to AHA Centre at Regular
IntervalsIntervals4. AHA Centre to Consolidate and Disseminate
Risk Information, and May Conduct Analyses , y yon Regional Level Implications
Disaster Characterized by UNISDR (2009)by UNISDR (2009)
Components of Disaster RiskDisaster Risk
EventHazard
CharacteristicsIn Exposed Area
Exposure/Affected Area
Vulnerabilityof Exposed
El t
Level ofDisruption
Beyond
Human-EnvironmentS t
Elements
Coping Capacity
Beyond Ability to Cope
Systemp g p yof ExposedElements
C i iConnectivity
Risk Assessment Characterized by UNISDR (2009)y ( )
A methodology to determine the nature and extent of risk byA methodology to determine the nature and extent of risk by analysing potential hazards and evaluating existing
conditions of vulnerability that could pose a potential threat or harm to people, property, livelihoods and the
environment on which they depend.
Risk assessments (and associated risk mapping) include: a review of the technical characteristics of hazards such as their location, intensity, f f , y,frequency and probability; the analysis of exposure and vulnerability including the physical, social, health, economic and environmental dimensions; and the evaluation of the effectiveness of prevailing and alternative coping capacities in respect to likely risk scenarios This seriesalternative coping capacities in respect to likely risk scenarios. This series of activities of activities is sometimes known as a risk analysis process.
Risk Assessments
• Can Be Qualitative or Quantitative• Can Be Technically and Thematically Simple or
Complex• Multi Hazard or Single Hazard• Multi-Hazard or Single Hazard• Are Performed for Communities, Sectors, Systems or
Objects• Should Support Larger DRR and EM Goals• Generally, Require Information on:
– Frequency and Intensity of Relevant Hazards– Assets and Resources that May Be Exposed– Characteristics that Make those Elements More Susceptible to p
Impact and Less Able to Cope– Losses
Considerations
• Like Maps, Estimations and Interpretations of Realityp , p y• Practical Tools to Help Us Do Our Jobs More
Effectively• Address a Limited Number of Factors• What You Include Depends on Purpose, Goals and p p ,
Constraints• In order to effectively support DRR and EM, risk
information must be relevant, accessible, understandable, and easily integrated and applied
• Supporting structures are important to success
Risk Assessment Roadmap
Purpose, Goals, and Objectives of Risk Assessmentp , , j