Top Banner
Rigging Math Calculating our WLL from catalog WLL
23

Rigging math

Dec 05, 2014

Download

Documents

dboevers

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Rigging math

Rigging Math

Calculating our WLL from catalog WLL

Page 2: Rigging math

Basically

WLL=UL(d)

Page 3: Rigging math

Basically

WLL=UL(d)

Working Load Limit

Ultimate Load

Design Factor

Page 4: Rigging math

But More Like

WLL=UL(d)(e)

Working Load Limit

Ultimate Load

Design Factor

Efficiency

UL(Force Ratio)

Page 5: Rigging math

And Actually

WLL=UL(d)(e)

My Working Load Limit

Ultimate Load

My Design Factor

Efficiency

UL(Force Ratio)

Catalog WLL/(d)

Vendor Design Factor

Page 6: Rigging math

Or

WLL=(Catalog WLL/Vendor Design Factor)(Force Ratio)(Design Factor)(Efficiency)

…But I can’t remember ever using precisely that formula.

Page 7: Rigging math

Terms

• WLL– Working Load Limit– Safe Working Load– Maximum Allowed Force

– A derived strength value based on the Ultimate Load and the Design Factor

Page 8: Rigging math

Terms

• UL– Ultimate Load– Failure Load– Minimum Failure Load– Breaking Strength– Minimum Breaking Strength

– The applied force that causes failure

Page 9: Rigging math

Terms

• Design Factor– Safety Factor… “saferty factor”

• A mathematical value applied to provide appropriate capacity for unknown influences

• Usually expressed as a ratio, i.e. “10:1”

Page 10: Rigging math

Terms

• Efficiency

• The nature of the application may require the load capacity to be reduced

• Some things that change efficiency– D/d Ratio– Type of termination

Page 11: Rigging math

Terms

• Force Ratio

• The nature of the application may require the applied load to be increased

• Something causing a force ratio– Accelerations• 16 FPM Chain hoists add 25% on stop and start

Page 12: Rigging math

Work In Steps

• Remember– Is this really the load?– Do I get full capacity?– Am I comparing apples & apples• Apples = Breaking Strength• Oranges = Vendor Working Load Limit• Peaches = My Working Load Limit

– Do Not Exceed Vendor Working Load Limit

Page 13: Rigging math

Work In Steps

• To derive your WLL for a given component– Multiply UL by your Design Factor• Include efficiency calculation if necessary

• To find UL– Look it up in the vendor information– Multiply vendor WLL by their Design Factor

Page 14: Rigging math

Example

• If the catalog WLL of a given ¼” screw pin anchor shackle is ½ Ton, what is the maximum applied force I can apply using a 10:1 Design Factor?

Page 15: Rigging math

Example

• ¼” Shackle has a WLL of 1/2t or 1000#• If you follow the asterisk you see this:

• “Maximum Ultimate Strength is 6 times the Working Load”

Page 16: Rigging math

Example

• Vendor WLL=1000#• Vendor Design Factor = 6:1• Ultimate load = 6000#

• My Design Factor = 10:1• My WLL= 6000#/10• My WLL= 600#

Strip their design factor to get to

breaking strength and then apply our more conservative design factor to get

to our WLL.

Page 17: Rigging math

Example

• What is the maximum load I can apply to a sling of ¼” 6x19 IWRC Cable terminated at each end with wire rope clips used in a “basket” over a 1 ½ Schedule 40 pipe.

Page 18: Rigging math

Example

• Find the cable breaking strength

• cable breaking strength is 2.94t or 5880#• Since breaking strength is given there is no

additional calculation

Page 19: Rigging math

Example

• Find the termination efficiency

• termination efficiency is “80% for 1/8”-7/8” sizes”

Page 20: Rigging math

Example• Find the efficiency of the cable around the

pipe• Pipe diameter

is 1.9”• Cable diameter

is 0.25”• D/d ratio is

7.6:1

• Efficiency is roughly 82%

Page 21: Rigging math

Example

• Find the capacity change due to sling configuration

• Basket is SWL x 2

Page 22: Rigging math

Example

• Cable Breaking Strength = 5880#• Termination Efficiency = 80%• Sling breaking strength

• 5880#(0.8)= 4704#

• Strength lost due to pipe diameter = 82%• 4707#(0.82)= 3857#

• Strength gained from configuration = 200%• 3857#(2)=7714#

• Apply our Design Factor of 10:1• 7714#(0.1)= 771#

Page 23: Rigging math

Rigging Math

Calculating our WLL from catalog WLL