Top Banner

of 12

Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

Apr 14, 2018

Download

Documents

Mira Jameson
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    1/12

    CELESTINESCA

    RHETORICAL TECHNIQUE IN THE PERSUASION OF MELIBEA

    Er ica MorganWorces ter , England

    I n h i s p ro l og u e t o t h e second v e r s i o n o f La Ce Ze st im Fernando deRojas i n d i c a te s t h a t i t s t h r ou g h r h e t o r i c t h a t he hopes t o a ch ie ve h i so b j e c t iv e s i n t h e c r e a t i o n o f t h e w or kl :

    y como sea c i e r t o que toda pala bra del hombre sc i en tees ta pref iada, de Esta se 'puede d e c i r que de muy hinchaday l l e n a q u i e r e r e v e n t a r , ech and o de s i t a n c r e c i d o sramos y . ho ja s , que de l m enor 'p im po l lo se saca r ia ha r tof r u t o e n t r e p ers on as d i s c r e t a s . 2T h is r e c o g n i t i o n o f t h e power o f r h e t o r i c l ea d s t o i t s e x te n s iv e usew i t h i n t h e f i c t i o n i t s e l f 3 We see Ro jas ' cha rac te rs persuad ing them-se lv es and one ano th er , a lmos t a lways w i th q re a t success, by e loque ntm a n ip u la t io n o f t h e d e vi ce s o f r h e t o r i c .4

    Wi tho u t a doub t , t h e c h a r a c t e r who i n d u l g e s mo st i n t h e u se o f r h e t -o r i c i s th e o l d p ro c ur e ss , C e l e s t i n a . H er spe ech es r e v e a l R o ja s ' t h o ro u g hg r ou n d in g i n th e a r t o f p e r su a si o n a nd a l s o se r ve t o q u e s ti o n t h e a dh er-ence o f c l a s s i c a l r h e t o r ic i a n s t o C at o' s d e f i n i t i o n o f r h e t o r i c ( " v i rbonus d i c e n d i p e r i t u s " ) a nd t h e c o n v i c t i o n t h a t goodness i s a p r e r e q u i s i t eo f t h e t r u e o r at o r, as Q u i n t i l i a n m a in ta in s i n h i s Inst i tu t io Oratoria:"Neque eni m esse o r a to r em n i s i bonum v i r um i nd i c o ; e t f i e r e e t i am s ip o t e s t n o l o . "5One o f t h e o b j e c t i v e s o f R o j a s ' a bu nd an t u se o f r h e t o r i c i n LC , t hen ,may h ave been t o c h a l l e n g e t h i s c l a s s i c a l i d ea o f t h e e x c l u s i v e u se o fr h e t o r i c f o r h on ou ra ble pu rp ose s and f o r i l l u s t r a t i o n o f t h e t r u t h . The

    s ucc es s w h ic h R o ja s a f f o r d s h i s c h a r a c te r s i n t h e em plo ym en t o f r h e t o r i ct o de c ei ve an d e n t i c e o t h e r s i n t o d is h on o u ra b le a c t i o n s d e ri d e s t h i s i d e at h a t r h e t o r i c can o n l y s e rv e t h e t r u t h . He t h us o f f e r s a c o u n t e r - d e f i n i -t i o n o f Q u i n t i l i a n ' s d e s cr ip t io n o f t h e t r u e rh e t o r i n t he f i g u r e o f Ce-l e s t i n a . C e l e s ti n a has a v e ry h i g h r a t e o f success i n h e r r h e t o r i c a lm anoeuve r ing and y e t she c ou l d ha r d l y , be p l ac ed w i t h i n t he c a t ego r y o f' v i r bonus '. H er i n t e n t i o ns a r e f a r f r om v i r t u ou s and we s h a l l see howsh e makes u se o f i r r e l e v a n t t r u t h s when r e l e v a n t t r u t h s do n o t s e r ve he r

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    2/12

    CELESTINESCA

    purpose. R ojas i s l au g hi ng a t Q u i n t i l i a n ' s d e f i n i t i o n o f t h e c l a s s i co r a t o r , as w i l l J ua n L u i s Vi ve s a f ew y e a r s l a t e r . 6One m i g h t q u e s t i o n t h e wisdom o f t h e u se o f a c h a r a c te r l i k e C e let i n a as t h e v e h i c l e o f such s t u d i e d r h e t o r i c a l t e c hn i qu e . I t i s c l e

    t h a t C e l e s t i na h e r s e l f has no academic bac kg r ound o t he r t han he r i n c i d et a l c o n t a ct w i t h p r i e s t s and f r i a r s . Her r h e t o r i c a l s k i l l s have bea c q u i r e d b y e x p e r i e n c e a n d c u n n i n g a n d b e a r w i t n e s s t o t h e f a c t t h a t q u iw i t s a r e j u s t a s i m p o r t a n t a s t e c h ni q u e . I n f a c t R oj as seems t o e x p l ot he r o l e o f r h e t o r i c as an i n t r i n s i c and i n e v i t a b l e p a r t o f eve ryd ay l i fr a t h e r th a n as b e in g co n f in e d t o t h e c l o i s t e r s o f academ ic l i f e .It i s pe rh ap s i n C e l e s t i n a ' s p e r su a s io n o f Me1 i b e a t h a t we see tm ost p ro l onged us e o f r h e t o r i c a l t ec hn i ques . C e l e s t i n a ' s m o t iv e f o r t hpersuas ion i s persona l ga in . Ro jas makes us aware o f her underhand in tet i o n s a t t h e b eg i nn i ng o f th e w ork when she f i r s t l e a r n s o f t h e p o s s i b ii t y o f a handsome r ew a rd f r om C a l i s t o i f she manages t o o b t a i n M e l ibea foh im. Sempronio in f orm s Ce les t in a:

    As i es . C a l i s to ard e en amores de Mel ibea. De ti y dem i t i e n e neces idad . Pues ju n to s nos ha meneste r, j u n -to s nos aprovechemos; que conocer e l t iempo y us ar e lhombre de l a opo rtu nid ad hace 10s hombres pr6spe ros. (I, 8)Th is i s p r ec is e l y what Ce les t in a p roceeds t o do. Her uncanny seno f t i m i n g an d t h e a dv an ta ge she t a k e s o f o p p o r t u n i t y , t o g e t h e r w i t h hi n n a t e r h e t o r i c a l s k i l l s , a l l o w h e r t o w i n o v e r M e li be a. R oja s i n t e nt h e r ea d er t o see t he se s k i l l s as i n t u i t i v e r a t h e r t ha n t h e r e s u l t academ ic p re p a r a t i o n . Q u i n t i l i a n h ad a l r e a d y r e c o gn i z e d t h e i n f l u e n c e i n n a t e a b i l i t y when he p o i n t e d o u t i n h i s I n s t i t u t i o O r a t o r i a t h a t t e cn i c a l r u l e s a r e us el es s w i t h o u t n a t u r a l g i f t s :

    I l l u d tamen i n p r i m i s t es ta nd um e s t , n i h i l p r ae ce pt aa t qu e a r t e s v a l e r e n i s i a n d i uv a nt e n a tu r a. 7T hrough C e l es t i n a , R o jas shows t h e i m po rt ance o f qu i c k w i t s s i nc e tr h e t o r must a lw ays be capab le o f de a l i n g w i t h unex pec ted deve lopm en tsi n t e r r u p t i o ns f r om h i s aud ience o r t h e pe r son t o whom he addr es ses hims e l f .

    T r a d i t i o n a l l y t h e a r t o f r h e t o r i c i s composed o f f i v e b as i c p a r ti n v e n t i o ( i n v e n t i o n ) , d i s p o s i t i o (a r rangement ) , e Z o c u t i o ( s t y 1e) , memoand p r o n u n c i a t i o ( d e l i v e r y ) . O f t he se f a c u l t i e s i t i s t h e seco nd w h ii n t e r e s t s us h er e f o r , i n s p i t e o f t h e l a c k o f f or ma l t r a i n i n g o n C elet i n a ' s pa r t , we see t h a t , i n t h e pe r s uas i on o f M e l ibea , k o j as endows hspeech w i t h t h e t r a d i t i o n a l s t r u c t u r e o f a r h e t o r i c a l speech as s e t o u t the d i s p o s i t i o , o r f a c u l t y o f a rr angemen t. 8 R h e t o r i c a l t ex t book s . sugget h a t th e f i r s t p a r t o f th e speech, t h e e x o r d i m , o r proemiwn, be devott o g a i n i n g t h e g o o d w i l l o f t h e a u d ie nc e. One shou ld a t tem pt t o evoke tf a vo u r a nd a t t e n t i o n o f t h e a ud ie nc e i n r e a di n es s f o r t h e p e rs u as io n w hit h e y a r e a b ou t t o u nd erg o. C e l e s t i n a ' s e x o r d i m r e s t s h e a v i l y o n t h e uo f p at ho s. Th i s techn ique was de f in ed by A r i s t o t l e who cons idere d mea

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    3/12

    CELESTINESCA

    o f p e rs ua si on t o be d i v i s i b l e i n t o tw o gr ou ps : t h a t o f a r t i s t i c t ech niq ue( e t hos and pa t hos) and l o g i c a l a rgum ent , and t h a t o f d i r e c t ev idence . 9P ath os r e f e r s t o t h e t e ch n iq u e o f e v o ki n g c e r t a i n e mo ti on s i n t h e a u d i -e nce . C e l e s t i n a use s p a th o s i n t r y i n g t o g a i n M e l i b e a ' s sym pa th y f o r h e ras a n o l d woman:Que, a l a m i fe , l a ve jez no es s ino mes6n de en fe r -medades, posada de pensamien os , ami ga de r e n c il s,c ongo ja c on t i nua , l a g a i n c u r a b l e , m a n c i l l a de 10pasado, pena de 10 p resen te , cu idado t r i s t e de 10po r v e n i r , v ec i na de l a m ue rt e, choza s i n rama quese l l u e v e por cada p ar te , cayado de mimbre que conpoca carga se dobleg a. ( I V, 90)

    M e li b ea shows s u r p r i s e a t t h i s m i s e ry a nd p o i n t s o u t t h a t m o st p e o p lel o o k f o r w ar d t o o l d age:LPor qu6 d ice s , madre, ta n to mal de 10 que todo e l ,mundo con t an e f i c a c i a goz a r y v e r des ea? ( I V , 90 )

    B e w a i l in g t h e d is c o m f o rt s o f o l d age, C e l e s ti n a c a r e f u l l y i g n o r e s t h ef a c t . t h a t s he m i gh t have been happ i 'e r i f she had had a d i f f e r e n t l i f e -s t y l e i n h e r y o u th . T h i s t y p e o f f a l s e enthymeme, o r i n co m p le t e s y l l o -g ism , i s t o be se en o f t e n i n t h e c o ur se o f h e r a rg um en ts .1 0As y e t , C e l es t i na has made no m en t i on o f t he c ou rs e o f ac t i on w h i c hs he i s s ubs equen t ly t o pe rs uade M e l i bea t o f o l l o w . H ow eve r, s he i s p r e -pa r i ng t he w ay . By comp la in ing ab ou t o l d age and mak ing i t sound so un-a t t r a c t i v e , she in s i n u a t e s t h a t one s ho u ld e n jo y l i f e w h i l e s t i l l young.T h is p o i n t w i l l be h e l p f u l l a t e r when C e l e s ti n a w is he s t h e tw o l o v e r s t ocome t o g e t h e r. The r e ad e r i s i n a p o s i t i o n t o d ou bt t h i s i n s i n u a t i o ns ince he knows that i t i s p a r t l y b ecause C e le s ti n a e n jo ye d l i f e r a t h e r t o o

    much w h i l e s he was y oung t h a t she f i n d s h e r s e l f i n s uch a s o r r y s t a t e now.We l a t e r see t h a t M e li be a does n o t c o n s id e r t h i s p o i n t , e i t h e r t h ro u g ho v e r s i g h t o r , and pe r haps m o r e l i k e l y , bec ause she p r e f e r s t o i gno r e anypo i n t w h i c h sugges ts t h a t s he s hou l d no t f o l l ow he r ow n des i r ed c ou r s e o fa c t i o n .C e l e s t i n a ' s exordium a l s o c o n t a i n s e x t e n s i ve u s e o f ethos, t he a f f i r -m a t i o n a nd p r o o f o f t h e m o ra l c h a r a c t e r o f t h e sp e ak er . She a t t e m p t s t ogain Me1i e a 's c o n fi d en c e by p r o f e s s i n g i n t e r e s t o n l y i n he a ve n ly r i c h e s ,and dem ons tr a tes c om p l e t e d i s r e ga r d f o r w ea l t h :

    Aquel es r i c o que es tS b ie n con D ios . Mds segura cosaes se r menosprec iado que tem ido . Me jor suefio duermee l pob re , que no e l que t i e ne de gua r dar c on s o l i c i t u d10 que con t r a ba jo gan6 y con do lo r ha de de ja r . N iam igo no se r d s im u lado y e l r i c o s i . Yo soy quer idapo r m i pe r sona ; e l r i c o po r s u hac ienda. ( IV, 91)

    The r e ad e r ca n p e r c e iv e t h e h y p o c ri s y i n t h i s , b u t M e li be a i s n o t i n ap o s i t i o n t o ju dg e.

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    4/12

    CELESTINESCA

    F re qu e nt i n v o c a t i o n o f God a l s o h e l p C e l e s t i n a t o p r o j e c t h e r s e l f a tho rou ghly mora l person i n th e eyes of Me1 ibea : e .g. 'Has ta que Dq u i e r a ' . A m u t u a l l y b e n e f i c i a l f i c t i o n , r e s t i n g on r e 1 g i o u s commp l ac e s, i s b e in g c r e a t e d .Speak ing o f how she has aged, Ce le s t i na uses th e t y p ic a l apo lo g ia i n g r a t i a t e h e r s e l f w i t h M e lib ea : 'Que as7 goce de es ta alma pecadora y de e se c ue rp o g r a c i o s o ' . ( I V , 9 4 ) T h i s p a r t o f t h e sp ee ch i s s i m i l a r th e concZus io , o r pero ra t io n ; bo th a re des igned t o move th e m ind and swt h e e m ot io n s r a t h e r t h a n b e in g d i r e c t e d a t t h e u n de r st a nd i ng . T he se t e cn i qu e s a r e c o n t i n u e d t h ro u g h o u t t h e o t h e r p a r t s o f t h e sp ee ch b u t a r e mc onc en t r a t ed i n t hese tw o pa r t s . By em p l oyi ng t hes e t ec hn i ques, C e l es t isu cce ed s i n e vo k in g M e l i b e a ' s sym pathy a nd i s r ew ard ed w i t h t h e g i f t ofew coins.R o ja s ' p r o v i s i o n o f C e l e s ti n a w i t h an e x c e l l e n t sense o f t i m ia l l o w s h e r t o r e a l i s e t h a t t h e moment i s o p p or tu n e t o move o n t o t h e n es ta g e o f t h e e x or d iu m w h ic h c om p ri se s f l a t t e r y : ' i O h a n g e l i c a im ag eiOh pe r l a p r ec i os a , y c6mo t e 10 d i c e s ! ' ( I V Y 93) She beg ins w i t h exc lam at io , one o f th e innumerab le f i g u re s o f speech recommended f o r to rnamenta t ion and embe l l i shment o f an a rgument. She a ls o con t inu es hu se o f e t h o s t o make h e r s e l f a p pe ar v i r t u o u s :

    E s t o t uv e s iempre , que r e r mds t r a ba j a r s i r v i en do ao t r o s , que ho l ga r c on t en tando a m i . ( I V , 93 )By he r appa r en t s e l f l e s s n es s she encour ages M e li bea t o ac t l i k e w i s"Ha ven ido es to, sef iora, po r 1'0 que de c ia de l a s a jenas neces idades y m ias " ( I V , 94 ) . M e li be a i s o n l y t o o happy t o o f f e r h e r h e lp , bu t C e l et i n a c o nt in u e s t h e f l a t t e r y u n t i l she i s s ur e o f h e r g ro un d and M e li by e t aga i n begs he r t o ask what s he w i l l : "P ide 10 que quer rds , sea paqu i en f ue r e " ( I V , 94) , and on l y t hen does C e l es t i na f ee l r e ad y t o v e n t ui n t o t h e se con d p a r t o f h e r sp ee ch , t h e n a r r a t i o . T h i s s e c t i o n , b e i n g s ta te m e nt o f t h e f a c t s , o u g ht t o b e c l e a r , c o n c is e a nd w e l l -f o u n d e d.o ug ht a l s o f o l l o w t h e t e mp o ra l o r d e r o f e v e n t s a nd be s u i t a b l y ado r ned .C e l e s t i n a ' s n a r r a t i o i s an o r a t o r i c a l n a r r a t i o n , as opposed t o an h i s t oi c a l o r p o e t i c o ne . O n ly p a r t o f th e t r u t h i s used, t ho se p a r t s w h ic h a g a i n s t t h e o r a t o r ' s c as e b e i n g o m i t t e d .C e l e s ti n a i n t r o d uc e s h e r p e t i t i o n : "Yo de j o un enfermo a l a muer( IV , 9 4 ). T h i s i s o n l y a p a r t i a l t r u t h . C a l i s t o i s s i c k, o r so he w anus t o b e l i e v e , l Z b u t h i s s i c kn e s s i s l o v e . C e l e s t i n a makes no m e n t io n M el ib ea o f t h e n a t u re o f h i s i l l n e s s s in c e t h i s c o u l d j e op a r di s e h e r p l aShe p roceeds w i t h t he u t m ost c a r e, t e s t i n g t he g round w i t h am b i gu i t i eand a lw ays l ea v i ng he r s e l f an esc ape r ou t e . It i s h e r e t h a t we se er e p e t i t i o n o f t h e use o f a d ou ble d e c e i t , as i n t h e case o f C e l e s t i n at r i c k i n g L u c r e ci a t o g a i n e n t r y t o M e l i b ea ' s house. She t e l l s M e li bt h a t on e w ord w i l l h ea l h e r p a t i e n t a nd en co ura ge s h e r w i t h f l a t t e r y :

    Que no puedo c re er que en b alde p i nt as e D ios unosges tos m5s pe r f ec to s que ot r os , mds dotados degrac ias, mds hermosas facc iones; s i n 0 p a r a h a c e r l o s

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    5/12

    CELESTINESCA

    almac6n de v i r t ud es , de m is er ic or d i a , de compasiC jn ,m in is t r os de sus mercedes y d id iv as , como a ti. ( IV , 94 )The abundance o f r e f e r e n c e s t o God i s an a tt e m p t t o a pp ea lbea 's apparent p i e t y , and seems t o succeed. Ce le s t in a employss e r i e s o f f a l s e a n a lo g i e s. She p r e se n t s a s e r i e s o f u n i v e r s a lh av in g a1 r ea dy r e f e r r e d t o t h e p a r t i c u l a r t r u t h o f Cal i s t o ' sW i t h a r h e t o r i c a l q u e s t i o n she s ug ge st s a c o m o n c o ur se o f a c t i o ntw o :

    t o M e l i -a l s o at r u t h s ,i l l n e s s .f o r t h eE l pe l i can 0 rompe e l pecho po r da r a sus h i j o s acomer de sus entrafias. Las c igue i ias man t ienen o t rota n to t i emp o a sus p a d re s v i e j o s en e l n i d o , c u a n toe l l o s l e s d i e r o n cebo s ie nd o p o l l i t o s . Pues t a lc o n o c im ie n to d i o l a n a tu ra a 10s a n imales y a ve s,i p o r qu6 10s hombres habemos de se r mis cr u el es ?iP o r qu6 no daremos par te de nues tras gr ac i as yper son as a 10s prCjximos, mayormente, cuando e s td nenvu el tos en secr e tas enfermedades y ta l e s que,donde e s t d l a m e l e ci na , s a l i 6 l a c ausa d e l aenfermedad? ( I V , 95)

    T h i s s up er b p as sa ge i s r i d d l e d w i t h a m b i g ui t y. The s u g g es t i on t h a tone s h ou l d g i v e o n e ' s " g r a c i a s " a nd " pe rs on as " t o o t h e r s i s a n o v e r tr e fe re nc e t o t h e s e x ua l r e 1 a t i o n s h ip w h i ch C e le s t i n a w is h es Me1 i b e a t oi n d u l g e i n w i t h C a l i s t o , a nd t h e " s e c r e ta s e n fe rm ed ad es " t o t h e n a t u r e o fC a l i s t o ' s i l l n e s s , l ov e- si ck ne ss ( h i s "s ec re to d o l o r" o f t h e f i r s t scene)w h i ch has i t s c au se i n Me l ib e a . How ever, none o f t h e s e t h i n g s i s s a ido pe nly . C e l es t i na i s c l e v e r l y l a y i n g a f a l s e t r a i l . Here r h e t o r i c i ss e r v in g a d ua l pu rp os e --one s i d e o f t h e c o i n i s f a l s e and t h e o t h e r i st r u e . I f , when C e l es t i na f i n a l l y men t ions Cal i s t o ' s name, Me1 ibea re fu sest o h ave a n yt h i n g t o do w i t h t h e p l a n , she c an i n t e r p r e t t h e " s e c r e t a s e n-fermedades" as too thache and make .he r e n t i r e e n t e r p r is e seem in noc en t andh ar ml es s. When C a l i s t o ' s name i s i n f a c t m e nt io ne d, M e l i be a f l i e s i n t o arage. Bu t , Ce les t in a knows f rom exper ience t h a t i t i s u s e le s s t o t r y t ota c k le Me l ib e a i n h e r a n ge r. As A r i s t o t l e sa y s: "Men g ro w m i l d when t h e yhave exhaus ted t h e i r anger upon an o t he r . " l3 So C e le s ti n a a1 lows Me1i eato v e n t h e r r a g e and, a s S h ip l e y p o in t s o u t , i t does n o t l e a d t o M e l i b e a ' sb a n i s h in g C e l e s t i n a f r o m h e r p re se nc e, b u t r a t h e r t o a demand fo r a ne x p la n a t i o n o f s uc h a u d a c i t y . 1 4 T h i s , t h e n, s u gg e st s a d e s i r e o n M e l i -b e a 's p a r t t o f i n d a n o th e r , more d ec orou s, e ve n f i c t i o u s , l e v e l o f commu-n i c a t i o n . L a t e r , when she i s a g a i n calm , C e l e s t i n a p u t s M e l i b e a ' s o u t -b u r s t o f r a g e t o g ood u se .Me l i b e a knows, a f t e r t h e g a rd e n s ce ne o f A c t I, t h a t C a l is t o i st r y i n g t o woo h e r , a nd i n h e r r a g e she assumes t h a t he i s t r y i n g t o seduceh e r, t h u s g i v i n g C e l e s t i n a t h e c ha nc e t o e mb ar ra ss h e r b y r e v e a l i n g t h etrum ped -up " r e a l r e as o n" f o r h e r v i s i t . T r u t h an d f a l s i t y a r e re ve rs ed :.

    Una orac iCjn , se f io ra , que l e d i e ro n que sab ias deSanta Apo lon ia pa ra e l d o l o r de l a s muelas . Asimismot u cordt in, que es fama que ha toca do todas [ la s ]

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    6/12

    CELESTINESCA

    r e l iq u i a s que hay en.Roma y Jeru sa lg n . Aquelcab a l le ro , que d i e , pena y muere de e l l a s . Es tafu e m i ven ida . ( IV , 97)C e l es t i na p l eads i gno r anc e o f any p r ev i ou s enc oun te r be tw een C a l iand Me l ibea . Bu t she has ach ieved one imp or ta n t a im . She has e l i c i tf rom M e l i bea t he adm i ss i on t h a t she f a i l e d t o denounc e C a l i s t o ' s adv ani n t h e g ar de n t o h e r p a r en t s . C e l e s t i n a ca n d ed uce f ro m t h i s t h a t M e l.ii s n o t so opposed t o C a l i s t o ' s adv ances as he r r age s ugges ted.The n e x t p a r t o f a r h e t o r i c a l sp eech , t h e p r o p o s i t i o n , may be c lu d e d o r o m i t t e d a c c o rd i n g t o i t s c on ve n ie n ce f o r an a rg um en t a t haT h i s f o rm s t he s t a t em en t o f t he ac t ua l c once r n o f a speech. The ac t uc on ce rn o f C e l e s t i n a ' s spe ech i s , o f c o ur se , t o a r ra n g e t h e l i a i sb etw ee n C a l i s t o a nd M e l i b e a. T h e r e fo r e t h e p r o p o s i t i o n , i n t h i s c as e, no t on l y unnec es s a r y bu t , i f i n cl u de d , w ou ld a lm o s t c e r t a i n l y p r o ve d e tm e nt al t o h e r c au se a t t h i s s t a ge . Thus t h e p r o p o s i t i o n does n o t a ppi n t h i s speech.T h e r e f o l l o w s t h e confirmatio, t he de f ense o f t he a rgum en t, and

    refutatio, t he d i s m i s s a l o f any oppos ing a rgum ent w h ic h m i gh t a r i sThese t wo p a r t s a r e i n t e g r a t e d i n C e l e s t i n a ' s sp eech .She speaks o f " mi l i m p i o r no ti v o " and p roc eeds t o l ab ou r t he v i r t u ec om pass ion. The f l a t t e r y w h i c h we have obs e rv ed i n t he p r ec ed i ng pa r t sCe les t ina ' s speech con t inues und im in ished :

    Compasi6n de su do l o r , con f ian za de t u ma gn i f i ce nc iaahoga ron en m i boca a1 p r i n c i p i o l a ex p r es i 6n de l acausa. ( IV , 97)To make Me l ibe a ashamed o f he r anger, and t o encourage fe e l in gs co mp assio n w h ic h w i l l l e a d h e r t o s u r re n d e r t h e g i r d l e , C e l e s t i n a ub i b l i c a l q u o t a t i o n a nd a n im a l i ma ge ry :

    No semejes l a t e l a r a i i a que no mues t ra su fue rza s in oc on t r a 10s f l a c os an i m a l es . No paguen justos porpecad ores. I m i t a l a d i v i n a j u s t i c i a , que d i j o : e lin im a 'que pecare, aq ue l l a misma muera; a l a humana,que jamds condena a1 pad r e po r e l d e l i t o de l h i j on i a1 h i j o po r e l d e l pa dre . ( I V Y 9 8)B e f o r e c o n t i n u i n g , C e l e s t i n a w is he s t o e ns ur e that any anger on Ml i b e a ' s p a r t w i l l n o t f a l l on h e r si nc e she i s me re ly ( i n t he f i c t i o n )

    i n t e r m e d i a r y h e l p i n g a s i c k man. She f i n a l l y co n vi nc e s M e li b ea t h a thad o n l y good i n t e n t i o n s : ' T a n to a f i n a s t u i g n o r a n c i a , que me h acreer 10 que puede ser ' . ( I V , 98 ) And Me1 i bea t r i e s t o ex p l a i n he r em bar ras si ng bu r s t o f r age :No tengas en mucho n i t e ma ra v i l l es de m i pasados en t i m i en t o , po rque c on c u r r i e r o n dos c osas en t uh a b la , que c u a l q u i e r a d e e l l a s e r a b a s t a n t e pa ra

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    7/12

    CELESTINESCA

    me saca r de seso: nombrarme ese t u ca ba l le ro , queconmigo se a t r e v i6 a ha bl ar , y tambiEn pedi rmepala bras s i n mds causa, que no se pod ia sospechar s in odafio pa ra mi honra. Pero pues todo v ie ne de buenapa rt e , de 10 pasado haya perd6n. ( IV, 98-99)T hi s same escape ro u te which Ce le st in a uses becomes an excuse fo rM e li b ea who i s b e g i n ni n g t o a l l o w h e r p a ss io n s t o o ve rco me h e r i n i t i a l i n -d i gn a ti o n. 1 5 She j u s t i f i e s s e nd in g h e r g i r d l e t o C a l i s t o by i t s b e in g ana c t o f c h a r i t y t o a man s u f f e r i n g f r om t o ot ha ch e :

    Que en a lguna manera es a l iv ia d o mi coraz6n, v iendoque es obra p i a y santa sanar 10s apasionados yenfermos. ( IV, 99)C e le s t i n a r e a l i z e s a t t h i s p o i n t t h a t h e r ca se i s n e a r l y won, s i n c e

    i t seems l i k e l y t h a t M el ib ea w i l l s ub mit t o C a l i s t o a f t e r l i t t l e f u r t h e rcoax ing. She moves on t o th e concZusio t o n e a t ly t i e up a l l th e s t ra yends o f her p rev io us work , beg inn ing w i t h an indignatio:

    i Y t a l en fe rrnd, s e ti or a ! P o r D i os, s i b i en l econoc ieses , no l e juzgases por e l que has d ich o ym o st ra do c on t u i r a . ( IV, 99). She l e ad s i n t o p r a i s e o f C a l i s t o u s i ng e x t r i n s i c t o p i c s o f t h e n a t ur eo f man as des c r i bed by C i c e r o i n h i s Topica. Co nv ic t ion can be won, C ice-r o sa ys, by e x e m p l i f y i n g v i r t u e i n tw o ways: by c om pa ri son o f t he s ub j ec tt o t he gods who a r e by na t u r e v i r t u ous , and t o men famous f o r t h e i r v i r t u eachieved by har d work. Ce le s t i na uses both:

    En D ios y en m i a lma, no t i e n e h i e l ; g ra c ias , dos m i l ;en franq ueza , A1ejandre;e.n esf ue rzo , HEctor;,gesto,d e un r e y ; g r a c i o s o , a l e g r e ; jamds r e i n a e n e l t r i s t e z a .De no bl e sangre, como sabes; gran ju st ad or , pues v e r l earmado, un San Jorg e. Fuerza y es fue rzo , no tu voH E r c u l es t an t a . La p r es enc i a y f ac c i ones , d i s p os i c i 6n ,des env o l t u r a , o t r a l engua hab i a m enes te r pa r a l a s c on t a r .Todo ju n to semeja Lnge l de l c ie lo . Por f e tengo que noer a ta n hermoso aquel g e n t i l Na rc iso , que se enamor6 desu p r op ia f i gu ra , cuando se v ido en l a s aguas de l afu en te. ( I V, 99.)

    T h i s e nu me ra ti on o f C a l i s t o ' s q u a l i t i e s , b u i l d i n g h im i n t o a s up er -human be i ng , has i t s i r o n i c s i de . F i r s t , C e l es t i na does no t know C a l i s t owe l l enough to know whether he embodies these q u a l i t i e s . I n any case , anyrecommendation f rom a dub ious cha rac t e r l i k e Ce l es t i na must be suspec t .S ec on dly , t h i s p r e s e n t a t i o n o f C a l i s t o l e a ds u s t o r e g a r d h im as much l e s sthan a hero when we see h im p la y -a c t i ng and assum ing th e r o l e o f th ec o u r t l y l o v e r . C a l i s t o ' s h e r o i c q u a l i t i e s , as d e sc ri b ed by C e le s ti n a, a r enow th ro wn i n t o s t a r k c o n t r a s t w i t h t h e p a t h e t i c l i t t l e a i lm e n t w hich shenow says has h im inc ap ac i ta te d : 'Agora , se iio ra , t i 6 n e le der r iba do unaso la muela, que jamiis cesa [de l qu ej ar . ( I v , 9 9 ) From here onwards i t i s

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    8/12

    CELESTINESCA

    M e li be a who i s d o i n g t h e w or k. C e l e s t i n a h as r o u se d h e r e c u r i o s i t y aM e li be a g i ve s h e r t h e ch ance t o t e l l h e r more a b o u t C a l i s t o t o s ec u re hf a v o u r : " i Y q u6 t a n t o t i e m p o h a ? " ( I V , 9 9 ) It i s n o t q u i t e c l e a r w he tht h e s ub se qu en t m i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n by C e l e s t i n a i s i n t e n d e d b y M e l i b e a n o t, b u t e i t h e r way i t p r o v i d e s C e l e st i na w i t h t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o g iC a l i s t o ' s a g e .

    M el ib ea f i n a l l y c re a te s a r ea so n f o r C e l e s t i n a t o r e t u r n , t o c o l l et he p r a ye r and begs h e r n o t t o t e l l C a l i s t o o f h e r r ag e l e s t he s h out h i n k h e r u n c h a r i t a b l e a nd t h u s f o r m a n u n f av o u ra b l e o p i n i o n o f hc h a r a c t e r :Pues m adr e, no l e des p a r te de 10 que pas6 a es ec a b a l l e r o , p o rq u e n o me t e ng a p o r c r u e l o a r r e b a t a d ao d e s h o n e s ta . ( I V , 10 0 )

    A l l t h a t M e l i b e a s ay s h e r e , a nd t h e comments f r o m L u c r e c i a , b ew i t ne ss t o t h e e f f i c a c y o f C e l e s t i n a ' s r h e t o r i c :i Y a , ya , p e r d i d a e s m i ama! i s e c r e t a m e n t e q u i e r e q uevenga C e l e s t i n a ! F ra ud e h ay ; m i s l e q u e r r i d a r, que1 0 d i c h o ! ( I V , 1 00 )

    And e f f e c t i v e l y t h i s i s wh at M e li b ea p r om is es :M i s h ar e p o r t u d o l i e n t e , s i m e n es te r f u e r e , en pagod e 1 0 s u f r i d o . ( I V , 1 0 0)

    C e l e s t i n a ' s f i n a l pi&e de r5sistance i s t h e s u b t le r e v e l a t i o n o f tr e a l m o t i v e o f h e r v i s i t a nd t h e i n t e n t i o n b e h in d t h e d i s p l a y o f r h e t o r iT h i s s e r i e s o f commonplaces w hi ch C e l e s t i n a c l e v e r l y l i n k s t o t h e s tt h i n l y v e i l e d o b j e c t i v e o f a n a mo ro us l i a i s o n a l s o s e r v e s t h e p u rp o s e p r o v i d in g M el ib e a w i t h a means o f j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r a ny f u r t h e r s t e p s sm i g h t t a k e r e g a r d i n g C a l i s t o . R e f e r r i n g t o t h e a mb ig uo us n a t u r e o f Cl i s t o ' s i l l n e s s a s she had d e sc r i be d i t e a r l i e r , she s ay s:P o rq ue , a un qu e [ l a s p a l a b r a s ] f u e r a n l a s q ue t dp en sa b as , e n s i n o e r a n m a la s ; q ue ca da d i a h a yhom br es penados po r m u je r es y m u je r e s po r hom br es,y e s t o o b ra l a n a t u r a y l a n a t u ra o r d en 6 la D io s yD i o s n o h i z o c o sa m a l a . ( I V , 1 0 1 )

    As a s t u d e n t o f Law, R o j a s w o u l d p e rh a p s h av e b ee n m or e f a m i l i a r wj u d i c i a l r h e t o r i c t h a n w i t h d e l i b e r a t i v e o r e n co m ia s t ic .1 6 However, tr h e t o r i c i n LC c an be c o ns id e re d t o b e o f t h e d e l i b e r a t i v e t yp e s i n cei s u se d a s " c o un s e l t o p e rs u ad e o r d i ss u a de t h e a u d ie n c e" [ i n t h i s c as e t w o l e v e l s : ( 1 ) t h e f i c t i o n a l c h a ra c t er s , a nd ( 2 ) t h e r e a d e r ] , w i t h r ep e ct t o a p a r t i c u l a r c ou rs e o f a c ti o n .1 7 T hu s i n LC , Rojas shows h i s cop ete nc e i n r h e t o r i c o u t s i d e h i s own s p e c i a l i z e d f i e l d . I t i s n o t p a r t i cl a r l y s u r p r i s i n g t h a t R ojas s h ou ld do t h i s , i n s p i t e o f h i s c l a i m i na u t o r a u n su a m i g o ' t h a t t h i s t yp e o f w r i t i n g was o u t s id e h i s own f i e ls i n c e , a s P.E. R u s s e l l p o i n t s o u t , " i t i s o f t e n t o o r e a d i l y assumed t h

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    9/12

    CELESTINESCA

    l e ga l s t ud i es t hen w ere as d i v o r c e d fr om humane l e t t e r s as t hey t end t o bei n m odern u n i v e r s i t i e s . " l 8 He goes on t o sa y t h a t " t h e l i n k b etw ee n l e g a land humane s t u d i e s was s u b s t a n t i a l l y r es t o r e d tow a rds t he end o f t he f i f -t e e n t h c e n t u r y [. . . ] T h er e i s no r ea so n t o d o u bt t h a t s uc h i n f l u e n c ea l s o a f f e c t e d t h e l a w f a c u l t y a t S alamanca a t t h e t i m e R o ja s was a s t u d e n tt h e r e " (192)The f i r s t a u di en ce o f Lc was p r obab l y c omposed o f s t uden t s a t S a l a -manca U n i v e r s i t y . Such an educa t ed aud ience , f a m i l i a r w i t h t he p r ec ep t so f l o g i c and r h e t o r i c , c o u l d e a s i l y p e r ce i ve t h e u n d e r l y in g s u b t l e t i e swhich Rojas sugges ts . I n s te a d o f t h e a u t h o r p r e s e n t j n g a d i r e c t r h e t o r -i c a l a rgument, i n th e hope o f sway ing h i s aud ience , he takes them ones t age f u r t h e r . T hey become t he on l ook e r s who w i t ne s s r h e t o r i c a t w ork i na n o t h e r w o r l d , t h e w o r l d o f f i c t i o n - - a w o r l d , however, t o w h ic h t h e y c anr e l a t e . I t i s t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p w h ic h made t h e w ork p o p u l a r f o r a muchw i de r and l e s s h i gh l y - t r a i n ed p ub l i c . T he r eade r s t oo c an be, and un-d o u b t e d ly w i l l h ave been, s u b j e c t t o r h e t o r i c , a nd now t h e y see t h e i rf i c t i o n a l c oun t e r pa r t s unde r go ing t he same p r oc ess . As ob j e c t i v e on l ook-e r s , f r e e d m o m e n t a r il y f r o m t h e i r own s e l f - i n t e r e s t , t h e y c an see t h e p r o -

    cess c l e a r l y and a r e a b l e t o p e r c e iv e t h e d e c e i t i n C e l e s t i n a ' s a d ep tm a n ip u la t io n o f r h e t o r i c a l t ec hn iq u es .O c c a s i ona l l y , how eve r, R o jas enc ou rages t he r eade r t o i d e n t i f y h im -s e l f w i t h t h e c h a r a ct e r s w i t h i n t h e f i c t i o n , t h u s m akin g him aw are t h a t h et oo s ha res t he same p r ob lem o f c l ouded v i s i o n as t he c ha r ac t e r s , when hei s p e r s o n a l ly i n v o l ve d i n t h e s i t u a t i o n and i s s u b j e c t t o h i s own em otio nsand d e s i r e s . R oja s p o i n t s o u t t h a t even t h e r h e t o r h i m s e l f i s i n d an ge ro f f a l l i n g u nd er h i s own s p e l l , as i n t he c as e o f C e l e s t i n a who p roducesa rgument s w h ic h , t hough f a l s e , c onv inc e even , h e r s e l f a t t i m es .19

    Al is a, l lamada a l a casa de su hermana, de ja l ugaroportuno a Celestina para que practique su arte re-tbrico con Melibea. Auto X, Comedia (~ Bu rg os , 1499?)

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    10/12

    CELESTINESCA

    NOTES

    C o l b e r t N ep au ls in gh , "The R h e t o r i c a l S t r u c t u r e o f t h e . ~ r o l o g u e sthe L i b r o de Buen Amor and th e CeZes t ina" , BHS, 51 (1974) . I n h i s s tuo f t h e r h e t o r i c a l s t r u c t u r e o f t h e e p i s t l e - p r e fa c e and p r ol og u e t o LNepau l s i ngh no t es t h a t we s om etim es f i n d t he au t ho r h i m s e l f p r e f i x i n g tan sw ers t o h i s w ork as an i n t r o d u c t i o n . . C e r t a i n l y h e r e R oj as i n d i c a tone o f h i s o b j e c t iv e s - - t h e i l l u s t r a t i o n o f t he power o f r h e t o r i c .

    Fernando de Rojas, La CeZest ina, ed. Doro thy Seve r in, 2nd e(Madr id : A1 ianza E d i t o r ia l , S.A., 1971), p . 40 . A l l r e fe renc es a re t h i s e d i t i o n .Carne lo SamonB, a s p e t t i d e l re to r i e i sm o neZZa CeZest ina , Fac o l t ( M a g i st e ro d e l l ' U n i v e r s i a d i Roma, 1 95 3 ( S t u d i d i l e t t e r a t u r a s pa gn oQ uade rno 2 ) , makes an ex t ens i v e s t udy o f t he c om b i na t i on o f r h e t o r i ct r a d i t i o n and r e a l l i f e i n t h e mouths o f R o ja s ' c ha ra ct er s.

    A lso cons ider ing language and rh e to r i c i n LC: Ma lco lm Read, "Lu CeZestand the Renaissance Ph i loso phy o f Language" , PQ, 55 (1976), 166-77.J u l o R od r iguez- P uC rt o las , L i t e r a t u r a , h i s t o r i a , aZ i enac i 6 n ( B ar clona: Labor , 1976), po in ts o u t the emphasis p la ced on human communicati n LC and t he po t e n t i a l o f s peec h as a means o f dec ep t i on : "Pero l a p abra puede tambien ser engafiosa, y s e rv i r para 10 que ' i dea lmente debe su t i l i z a d a . Los d i i l o g o s de 10s persona jes de LC as7 10 p rueban: v i e ja - - y no s610 e l la -m an ej a habi lmente 1,a pa lab ra para engai iar a sus sme jan tes, i n c l us o a sus m is cercanos segu idores [. . . ] La palab[ . . .], u t i l i z a d a p erv er sa m

    in instrument0 de comunicac(pp. 153-54).en t e , des v i r tuada , puede c o nv e r t i r s e as i no 6n au ten t i c a , s in o de con f us id n y de engaf

    "I o l d t h a t no oneand, even i f he cou ld be ,t r a n s l a t e d b y H.E . B u t l e r iHeinemann, 1963), pp. 40-41.

    c an be a t r u e o r a t o r un l es s he i s a good mI would not have -it s o . " Q u i n t i l i a n , V o l .n t he Loeb C l a s s i c a l L i b r a r y ( London : W i l l

    A n t o n i o M a r t i , La p r ec ep t i v a r e t 6 r i c a espa%oZa en eZ si gZ c(Mad rid: Gredos, 197 2), pp. 23-24."There i s however one p o i n t wh ich I us t emphas ise before Iw hic h i s t h i s . W i th o ut n a t u r a l g i f t s t e c h n i c a l r u l e s a r e u s el es s"19) .

    beg( I , 1

    D i sp o s i t i o i n i t s t u rn i s d i v id e d i n t o s i x p a rt s : 1 ) e x o r d( i n t r o d u c t i o n ) , 2 ) n a r r a t i o ( n a r r a t i o n ) , 3 ) p r o p o s i t i o - -a l s o known d i u i s i o o r p a r t i t i o - - ( t h e p r o p o s i t i o n , s u b j e c t o f t h e s pe ec h) , 4 ) c o n fim a t i o ( p r o o f ) , 5 ) r e f u t a t i o - - o t h e r w i s e known as c on f u t a t i o o r r ep rehes i o - - ( r e f u t a t i on o f opposi ng a rgumen ts ), and 6 ) c oncZ us io ( pe r o r a t i oc oncl us i on ) .

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    11/12

    CELESTINESCA

    George Kennedy, The A r t of Rh eto ric i n t he Roman WorZd ( P r i n c e t o n :Pr in ce to n Un iv e rs i t y P ress, 1972) , pp . 114 and 221 ,l0e l e s t i n a i m p l i e s t h e s y l l o g i s m ' o l d age i s u n co m fo r ta b le , I amo l d , t h e r e f o r e I am unc om for t ab le ' . The enthymeme i s f a l s e s i nc e o l d age

    i s n o t , o f i t s e l f , n e c e s s a r i l y u nc om fo rt ab le . I n t h i s ca se C e l e s ti n a maybe c o ns i d e re d t o be p a r t l y t o b la me f o r h e r own d i s c o m f o r t .l1os e R i c o VerdG, "Resumen de l a s do c t r i n i s r e t 6 r i c a s en e l s i g l o deo ro ", i n h i s La ret6rica esp ai i~l a e 20s sig lo s XVI y XVII (Madr id : CSIC,l973) , p . 258.l2eorge A. Sh ip le y , "Con cer t ing th roug h Conce i t : Unconvent iona lUses o f Convent ion al S ickness Images i n La CeZes tina", MLR, LXX ( l975),324-32. S h i pl e y r e f e r s t o C a l i s t o ' s r e l i a n c e on t h e c l i c h e s o f l o v e - s i c k -ness f o r t h e e xp re ss io n o f h i s f r u s t r a t i o n : "Pena, aftigido, dolor, reme-dio , and a dozen r e l a te d words become key pa r t s o f a complex image sys temfro m w h ic h C a l i s t o d e r i ve s c o n s i d er a b l e s a t i s f a c t i o n , h i s v e rb a l s u b s t i -

    t u t e f o r t h e a p p a re n t ly i n a c c e s si b l e p le a su re s o f M el ib ea . I n s i s t e n t l yi n t h e f i r s t a c t s t h e l o v e r im po se s t h e same l an g ua g e on a l l t h o s e whom us t d e a l w i t h him . H i s s e r v a n t s r e p e a t e d l y o b j e c t t o t h e e x a g g e r at i o n i nh is speech [. . . . l , a nd t h e i r a l i e n a t i o n f ro m t h e p u rv ey or o f s uch s ca rc e-l y persona l images i s shared by th e rea der (who may be taken aback by th ed is co ve ry o f h i s s o l i d a r i t y , i n q u es t i on s o f s t y l i s t i c decorum, w i t hl a c ke y s , p r o s t i t u t e s , a nd p r o c u re s s [ s i c ] ) " ( p . 3 2 4) . S h i p l e y p o i n t s o u tt h e way i n w h ic h s ic k ne s s im ag ery, i n i t i a t e d by C a l i s t o , i s m a n ip u la t ed bya l l p a r t i e s c on ce rn ed and t u r n e d t o t h e i r a dva nta ge , p a r t i c u l a r l y by Ce-le s t in a , as we see her do here. He a l s o a t t r i b u t e s r a t he r m ore awa renesst o M e li be a i n t h e e s ta b li sh m e n t o f t h e f a l s e l e v e l o f c om mu nic atio nc e n t r e d on C a l i s t o ' s i n v e n te d t oo t ha c h e.l3r i s t o t l e , The 'A rt ' of Rhetoric, t r ans l a t ed by J ohn H en r y . Freese(London: W i l l am Heinemann, l9 59 ), p. 189.l4C onc e r t i ng t h r ough C onc e i t " , p. 327.l5.K. Read, "Fernando de .Ro jas l V is io n o f the B i r t h and Death o fLanguage", MLN, X C I I I ( 1978 ), 169- 70 : " Such i s t he od d i t y , i n c o ng r u i t yand d i s p a r i t y betw een t he s t anda r d m ean ing o f t h e w ords used by t he o l dbawd and t h e n a tu r e o f t h e s i t u a t i o n i n w h ic h th e y o cc u r t h a t t h e y s i g n a l

    ~CI.M e li b ea t h a t she i s t o . i n t e r p r e t them a c c o r d in g l y . T h i s she does~ P ~ e n s a sue no tengo sen t idas tu s p isa das e en ten d ido t u dai iado mensa-j e ? ; ' ) a nd t ho u gh t h e l an gu a ge o f in nu e nd o i n h i b i t s h e r r e t a l i a t i o n , i ta l s o a l l o w s h e r t o i n d u l g e i n d e c e i t w i t h ap p a re n t i m p u n i ty ( "E s o b ra p i a6 Santa sanar 10s pass ionados 6 enfe rmos . " )l6s C i c e r o e x p l a i ne d i n h i s Topica, t r a n s l a t e d b y H.H. H ubbe l l(Cambridge, Mass .: Harvard U n iv e rs i t y Press , 1949), p . 453, th er e a ret h r e e k i n d s o f r h e t o r i c a l speeches: j u d i c i a l , t h e a im o f w hi ch i s t oa c h i e ve j u s t i c e ; d e l i b e r a t i v e , t h e e nd o f w h ic h i s a dv an ta ge ; a nd e nc o-m i a s t i c , t h e a i m o f w hi ch i s h on ou r.

  • 7/29/2019 Rhetorical Technique in the Persuasion of Melibea

    12/12

    CELESTINESCA

    l7ee A. S onn ino, A Handbook h ixteenth-Century Rhetoric (LondoRout ledge Kegan Paul, 1968), p. 243.'l8. E. Russell "The Celest im cmentuda" i n Medievat HispmStudies Presented t o Rita Hamilton (London: Tamesis, l9 76 ), pp'. 175-9

    a t p. 191.l9he au t hor i s most g ra te fu l t o P ro fess or A.D. Deyermond, DDoro thy Sever in , P ro fe ssor J. Snow an d D r. R o b i n C a r t e r f o r t h e i r i n v a la b le a d vi ce and c o r r e c t i o n s d u r i n g t he p r e p a r at i o n o f t h i s a r t i c l e .-

    La ' f u r i a ' de Me l i bea . A u to I , escena p r i mera de l a o b ra .De l a t r adu cc i 6n a l emana d e C . Wi rsung (1520) .