Top Banner
1 1 Reward Management TEACHING AND LEARNING UNIT 1 Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks Professor Brian Main 2 Employee Reward be familiar with the alternative approaches to employee reward recognise the role of context in relation to employee reward be able to reflect systematically on the consequences of choices of approach in context After engaging with ideas discussed in this course you should: 3 4 5 http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/dec/05/oecd-ineqaulity-report-uk-us 6 1. Introduction to course – Employee Reward 2. The concept of the effort bargain 3. Systems thinking – interacting factors 4. Employer - employee orientations 5. Corporate, national and international contexts for thinking and acting on employee reward Learning Points Unit 1.(i)
23

Reward Management Introduction

Nov 26, 2015

Download

Documents

Uma Srinivasan

Introducing the subject reward management
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 11

    Reward Management

    TEACHING AND LEARNING UNIT 1Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks

    Professor Brian Main2

    Employee Reward

    be familiar with the alternative approaches to employee reward

    recognise the role of context in relation to employee reward

    be able to reflect systematically on the consequences of choices of approach incontext

    After engaging with ideas discussed in this course you should:

    3 4

    5http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/dec/05/oecd-ineqaulity-report-uk-us

    6

    1. Introduction to course Employee Reward

    2. The concept of the effort bargain

    3. Systems thinking interacting factors

    4. Employer - employee orientations

    5. Corporate, national and international contexts for thinking and acting on employee reward

    Learning PointsUnit 1.(i)

  • 27

    What is employee reward?

    A reward may be anything tangible or intangible that an organisation provides to its employees either intentionally or unintentionally in exchange for the employees potential or actual work contribution, and to which individuals attach a positive value

    reward

    remuneration

    compensation 8

    The effort-and-reward bargain

    In its socio-economic relational context Every employment contract consists of two elements:

    (1) an agreement on the [reward] rate (either per unit of time or per unit of output);

    and (2) an agreement on the work to be done.

    Hilde Behrend (1957)University of Edinburgh (1954 1982)

    9

    Reward systems

    Classical labour economics models may be viewed as closed wage-setting systems.

    Occupational psychology may equally focus on stimuli internal to the individual organism.

    General systems theory (although not without critics) enables the analysis of effort-reward relationship patterns as open systems that interact dynamically and reciprocally with the environment, to understand the way different reward systems operate in practice.

    10

    Reward design

    Edward E. Lawler III

    The New Pay

    its not just what you pay

    its how you pay

    if you want team work

    do not use individual bonus payments

    11

    Nature of reward

    Extrinsic

    tangible or transactional element for the work

    money, health care, company car, pension etc

    Intrinsic

    something derived from the work

    development oriented: job satisfaction, learning (self-actualisation)

    environment oriented: pleasant and safe working conditions 12

    Unit labour costs

    Cost of labour utilised per unit of output

    Total labour costs

    _______________ Total output

    Clearly wish this to be as low as possible

  • 313

    Reward versus Labour Cost

    Low wages do not guarantee low unit labour costs

    low wages attract low quality workers

    low output per worker raises labour costs

    High wages need not imply high unit labour costs

    high wages attract productive workers

    high wages encourage high commitment

    unit labour costs lowers at high productivity14

    Reward Systems

    wages are not set in isolation

    what other groups getting paid

    what were paid last period

    what is happening in the economy (inflation, unemployment)

    AND you actions may affect these other things

    This last point distinguishes OPEN SYSTEMS from CLOSED SYSTEMS

    15

    Examples of reward issues

    Bankers bonuses

    Executive pay

    Minimum wage

    Public sector wage restraint

    etc

    16

    Labour as a factor of production

    capital, land, labour

    with labour person accompanies factor into production

    there is a relationship

    employer employeeeconomics + social psychology

    17

    Exercise in effort-reward bargaining

    consider the job of a sales assistant

    in a large Department Store (e.g., Harvey Nicholson)

    list what the employer wants

    list what the employee wants

    identify points of tension/disagreement

    suggest ways to use reward to resolve these

    18

    Employer orientations towards the workforce

    Interpretation Issues Reward agendaEmployees valuable objects but devoid of feelings

    How do we get the best and keep them in good shape?Instrumental.

    Instrumental relationship;Pay by results;Exploitative?

    (i) Employees our greatest asset need to be used effectively

  • 419

    Employer orientations towards the workforce

    Interpretation Issues Reward agenda

    Employees as liabilities troublesome responsibilities; need to be policed

    How do we minimise problems;Keep under close surveillance?Wary/antagonistic?

    Arms length relationship; minimise cost.

    (ii) Employees are a liability need to be controlled

    20

    Employer orientations towards the workforce

    Interpretation Issues Reward agendaEmployees are independent beings with choices based on logic and emotion loyalty contingent.

    What do we want as an employee?What can we offer?Employee-centred relationship.

    Understand employees preferences.Honesty and transparency.Service orientation.

    (iii) Employees are customers need to understand and serve them

    21

    Employer orientations towards the workforce

    Interpretation Issues Reward agendaEmployees are independent beings with choices based on logic and emotion commitment contingent.

    What do we want as an employee?What can we offer?Partner -centred relationship.

    Understand employees preferences.Honesty and transparency.Alliance orientation.

    (iv) Employees are corporate allies develop a mutual success agenda

    22

    Alternatives; Consequencies; Contexts

    e.g.:

    reward on time committed

    versus

    reward on performance

    (i) Alternatives:

    3 themes present in all discussions

    23

    Alternatives; Consequencies; Contexts

    e.g. of choice of payment by hour:

    poor quality output

    need to police hours worked

    etc.

    (ii) Consequencies:

    24

    Managers should try to define given the current limitations of the environment, and the chances of altering them to make elbow room what the best course of action might be.

    Alternatives; Consequencies; Contexts

    (iii) Contexts:

    Context-free Context-bound

  • 525

    Employee reward management contexts

    Context factors:

    industry sector age and scale of enterprise state of economic conditions legislation (eg national minimum wage, disclosure

    requirements on executive remuneration) extent of globalisation presence or absence of trade unions skills shortages/tightness of labour market(s)/talent

    war pressures technological profile geographical setting

    26

    Employee reward management contexts

    Context factors (continued):

    local/transnationally mobile workforce corporate governance priorities rate of product/service change duration of value-creation cycles annual employee voluntary turnover workforce demographics ownership/finance capital investment profile carbon footprint

    27

    Employee reward management contexts

    Context factors (continued):

    management style and values organisational culture mergers and acquisitions planned/pending joint ventures/partnerships

    28

    Summary

    Reward defined extrinsic and intrinsic An effort bargain relationship-based Systems thinking interacting factors Employer-employee orientations Corporate, national and international contexts for

    thinking and acting on employee reward

    http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/pay/general/payrewrdovw.htm

    for a CIPD factsheet.

    29

    Theorising employee rewardUnit 1.(ii)

    30

    Why theory?

    the rules: theories are behind all employee reward ideas.

    there are lots of competing theories knowing the rules helps you to understand whats said. knowing the sources and assumptions of ideas about what this or that reward policy/practice is predicted to do is empowering: you evaluate it through understanding,

    and you decide if it fits the situation youre in (and why).

  • 631

    Closed system theory

    Classical Labour Market - Economic man: market-based exchange relation assumption that an employee will seek to minimise sacrificed leisure time to work and to maximise the rate of pay. Labour supply and demand regulate the price (wage rates).

    Units (hours) of labour

    Wage rate

    S

    D

    e

    a)

    32Labour units

    Marginal Value of Labour

    ()

    MVPL

    B

    C

    AWage

    Conventional view of labour demand

    33Labour units

    Marginal Value of Time

    ()

    Supply of Labour

    E

    F

    D

    Wage

    Conventional view of labour supply

    34Labour units

    Supply of Labour

    E

    F

    D

    Wage

    Labour Demand

    MVPL

    B

    C

    A

    GW *

    L *

    Conventional view of labour market equilibrium

    35Labour units

    Supply of Labour

    E

    F

    D

    Wage

    Labour Demand

    MVPL

    B

    C

    A

    GW *

    L *

    Conventional view of labour market equilibrium

    36

    Adam Smith (Wealth of Nations)

    The whole of the advantages and disadvantages of different employment of labour and stock must, in the same neighborhood, be either perfectly equal or continually tending to equality. If in the same neighborhood there was any employment either evidently more or less advantageous than the rest, so many people would crowd into it in the one case and so many would desert it in the other, that its advantages would soon return to the level of other employments. This at least would be the case in a society where things were left to follow their rational course, where there was perfect liberty and where everyman was free both to choose what occupation he thought proper, and to change it as often as he thought proper.

    Conventional view compensating wage differentials

  • 737

    Adam Smith (Wealth of Nations)

    The five following are the principal circumstances which, so far as I have been able to observe, make up for a small pecuniary gain in some employments, and counterbalance a great one in others: first, the agreeableness or disagreeableness of the employments themselves; secondly, the easiness and cheapness, or the difficulty and expense of learning them; thirdly, the constancy or inconstancy of employment in them; fourthly, the small or great trust which must be reposed in those who exercise them; and fifthly, the probability or improbability of success in them.

    Hay points: skill, responsibility, effort etc.

    Conventional view compensating wage differentials

    38

    1. Non-pecuniary aspects of working conditions

    2. Human capital: Expense of learning the business

    3. Constancy of employment

    4. Responsibility or trust reposed

    5. Probability of success

    Compensating Wage Differentials

    Adam Smiths

    39

    Wage

    Injury Probability

    U1

    U2U3

    AB

    CW2

    W1

    P1 P2

    Example of conventional view

    compensating wage differentials

    Supply

    40

    Wage

    Injury Probability

    U1

    U2U3

    AB

    CW2

    W1

    P1 P2

    PW

    Accept increase in probability of injury (P) in return for increase in wage rate (W)

    Example of conventional view

    compensating wage differentials

    Supply

    41

    H

    Wage

    Injury Probability

    Production

    Technology

    F G

    W4

    W3

    P3 P4

    Example of conventional view

    compensating wage differentials

    Demand

    42

    Wage

    Injury Probability

    U1

    U2U3

    HW5

    P5

    Work for W5Accept risk P5

    Example of conventional view

    compensating wage differentials

  • 843

    Closed system theory continued

    Institutional Theory: factors in environmental and institutional context scale of organisation industry sector trade union presence imperfect information bounded rationality transaction costs imperfect mobility (mill towns)

    b)

    44

    Closed system theory continued

    Institutional Theory: decisions contingent on context may lead to a shared history common understandings emerge lead to a shared legitimacy of custom and practice

    b)

    45

    Entry Level 1

    Entry Level 2

    Internal Labour Marketsc)

    ports of entry

    Administered wages; rent sharing46

    Entry Level 1

    Entry Level 2

    Internal Promotion

    Promotion as an incentive device - tournaments

    Internal Labour Markets

    Promotion as incentive/ reward

    Not for fit

    ports of entry

    47

    Unexpected termination of employment relationship

    Separation as a discipline device !

    Career Concerns

    48

    External succession as incentive

    Succession as an incentive device !

    Career Concerns

  • 949

    Top prize

    CEO job

    Tournaments

    Relative performance measures

    Lazear Rosen

    Lazear, Edward and Rosen, Sherwin (1981) Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, No 5, October, pp 841-864.

    d)

    50

    Promotions as a Tournament

    versus

    Promotions as a matching process

    The Peter Principle

    Employees in an organization rise to the level of their own incompetence.

    Career Concerns - promotion

    ALSO, when output depends on team effort this can lead to free riding Or sabotage - industrial politics influence costs.

    51

    Promotions as a Tournament ?

    If it is a tournament (or any payment based on relative performance), there is more than one way to win a footrace

    Bad-mouth oppositions Snuggle up to the boss etc

    All non-productive activity-Influence activities

    -Industrial politics

    Career Concerns - promotion

    52

    Wage-gap theorye) Trade union mark-up

    Monopoly power in the supply of labour allows trade union to secure a mark-up over the going or market rate

    - especially where employer enjoys some monopoly power in the product market rent sharing

    53

    EarningsOr Costs

    Age2118

    Earnings with no degree

    Earnings with degree

    Human Capitalf) College decision

    54

    EarningsOr Costs

    Age2118

    Earnings with no degree

    Earnings with degree

    B

    C

    Student funds own education

    Human Capital - College

  • 10

    55

    No Training

    Age21 65

    Earnings

    With Training

    Human Capital on-the-job

    56Age21 65

    Earnings

    With Training

    No Training

    Human Capital on-the-job

    57

    Productivityor Earnings

    Age3021

    Productivity with no training

    Productivity with training

    Hold up costs

    B

    C

    Human Capital who pays?Simplifydiagram

    58

    Wage profile of trainee: 125 then 160

    ProductivityOr Earnings

    Productivity with no extra training

    Productivity with extra training

    Age3021

    125

    160

    185

    100

    140

    Wage premium = P

    Human Capital who pays?

    100 = productivity during training; 185 = after training140 = productivity without training;

    59

    Expected net present values:C the cost of trainingB the benefits that will accrue to the employerS the salary that must be paid because of the training

    Assume employer pays for training:

    B S > C train

    The Arithmetic of training

    60

    Polar cases:

    B > C

    (i) S = 0 train, employer pays(ii) S = B employee should be willing to pay for training

    if can find finance

    The Arithmetic of training

  • 11

    61

    Between these two polar cases:

    B > C and 0 < S < BTraining should go ahead

    Employee will pay up to SEmployer will pay up to (B-S)

    Willingness to pay:S + (B - S) = B > C

    Surplus to be shared

    The Arithmetic of training

    62

    Specific Human CapitalProductivity with employer is higher once trainedProductivity no higher with other employerEmployer and employee share costs

    General Human CapitalProductivity higher everywhereEmployee pays

    Barron and Kreps Chapter 15

    Human Capital who pays?

    63

    The gross value added from the training is affected by:1. Factors that impact on the employees tenure

    with the firm, including demographics, local job market conditions, and the firms HR practices.

    2. The employees pre-existing skills and how the training in question might complement those skills.

    Training

    64

    3. The impact of the training on employee effort and loyalty, because the training improves the employees bargaining position vis--vis the firm.

    4. Spillovers to other employees, both direct (the newly acquired skills are shared with co-workers) and indirect (by signalling to others and by reinforcing the organisations culture).

    5. The impact the training programme has on recruitment.

    Training

    65

    The share of this value added that is retained by the firm depends on the general bargaining strengths of employee and employer, including:a) The extent to which the training develops

    firm-specific versus more general-purpose human capital

    b) Whether a substantial lemons problemexists for other employers who might seek to lure the employee away

    c) The degree of employee inertia, particularly loyalty engendered by the training

    Firms share of value added

    66

    1. Outstanding training programmes can be leveraged by turning them into general training institutes, which both amortises the cost of the programme and gives the organisation the ability to skim the cream of trainees.

    2. Government support can sometimes be enlisted to help defray the costs of training.

    3. On-the-job training can sometimes be relatively cheap, and apprentices can sometimes be employed for less than the value they provide the organisation.

    Costs of training

  • 12

    67

    1. Cost-benefit calculations concerning human capital investments may be distorted because important benefits are intangible or long-term in nature.

    2. Additional benefits of training arise through symbolic effects and impacts on third parties.

    3. Systematic experimentation with the design of training programmes, criteria for selecting whom to train, and post-training assignments can help identify and maximise the value-added features of training activities.

    Designing training programmes

    68

    Principal-Agent Relationship: Principal (owner) wants hard working employee Employee wants a pleasant life

    Supervision - expensive

    Pay for PerformanceIncentive alignment mechanism design

    Principal-Agent Theoryg)

    69

    Motivation

    Standard economic model utility maximising rational amount of effort?

    Income goodEffort bad

    Asymmetric information complicates matters:hidden action

    moral hazardpost-contractual opportunism hidden

    information adverse selection

    pre-contractual opportunism70

    Principal-agent solution

    Two-part approach

    1: figure out what agent will do by way of effort when confronted with various incentive (payment by results) contracts

    2: use this information to select the scheme that (given the predicted reaction of the agent) produces the greatest profit

    Action may not always be effort minimising. E.g. CEO takes pleasure in increased status from running larger organisation and may be led into acquisitions (M&A activity) that are not in the interest of the company.

    71

    Performance

    Pay

    Firm A

    Firm B

    Base Pay versus Performance Pay

    Incentive compensation

    (i) e.g. executive pay

    72

    Self selection of high ability types

    Self selection of entrepreneurial types

    Tolerance for risk

    Self-belief

    Base Pay versus Performance Pay

    Rewards effortPost-contractual:

    Pre-contractual:

  • 13

    73

    Years of service

    Pay

    Firm A

    Firm B

    Base Pay versus Performance Pay

    Deferred compensation

    (ii) e.g.

    Deferred payment

    74

    Motivation and Remuneration

    Hidden information adverse selection

    Stay for a long time ?- Low pay but great pension.

    Hidden action moral hazard

    Work hard in the interests of firm?- zero base pay but high bonus

    75

    Principal-agent solution

    Two-part approach

    1: Figure out what agent will do by way of effort when confronted with various incentive (payment by results) contracts

    2: Use this information to select the scheme that (given the predicted reaction of the agent) produces the greatest profit subject to the outcome remaining attractive to the agent

    Action may not always be effort minimising. E.g. CEO takes pleasure in increased status from running larger organisation and may be led into acquisitions (M&A activity) that are not in the interest of the company.

    76

    Higher commission rates provide stronger incentives than lower commission rates

    A high commission rate above a certain threshold isgenerally better than a low rate on all sales, butthe threshold setting process must have integrity:

    Dont change targets easily Never use individual past performance as the new target Avoid caps since high productivity workers are penalized

    Some principles of incentive design

    We will see that caps are very common in the design of directors remuneration

    77

    Analogy of the fish in the water

    Gordon Bethune Continental Airlines (now part of United)

    78

    Signalling:Want high ability peopleEducation signal is cheaper to the more ableThe more able signal their presence by offering

    educational credentials

    Screening: Employer may use a difficult to alter

    characteristics to indicate a difficult-to-measurelabour market characteristics

    Can lead to discrimination e.g., gender and career intentions

    Signalling and Screeningh)

  • 14

    79

    Organisations can encourage the right applicants through: Offering premium wages and conditions, thereby

    attracting a larger, more able applicant pool Self-selection, which is a powerful tool for

    finding applicants who fit Referrals from current employees, which often

    have beneficial effects (including on the referrer) but can also reproduce the existing workforce

    Judicious use of personnel search organisations

    Recruitment

    80

    Closed system theory

    Psychological drives

    regulate the motivation to work (for reward)

    motivational drive to obtain extrinsic reward will diminish as basic needs are satisfied

    individuals will be motivated to satisfy higher-order (intrinsic) needs self-actualise.

    Closed system The managerial role is limited:

    just respond to the conditions.

    i)

    81

    j) Efficiency Wages

    Paying higher wages is CHEAPER:

    1. Cheat-threat effect

    2. Sample selection effect

    3. Turnover effect

    4. Gift-exchange/ Morale effect

    5. Union deterrence effect

    82

    Deferred compensation

    Wage

    Age

    Productivity

    Waget

    A

    B C

    D

    E

    F

    Alternative view - Bondingk)

    83

    Deferred compensation

    Wage

    Age

    Productivity

    Waget

    A

    B C

    D

    E

    F

    Alternative view - Bonding

    84

    OBEF = OACDEF in present value terms

    Allows reduced supervision costs more efficient

    Wage

    Age

    Productivity

    Waget

    A

    B C

    D

    E

    F

    Alternative view - Bonding

  • 15

    85

    Employment Contracts:

    1. Spot contract for future service

    2. Contingent claims contract

    3. Wait for future then spot contract

    4. Contract now for authority relationship

    Possible modes of employer-employee relationship:l)

    86

    All beset by transactional details:

    1. First-mover advantage

    2. Problems of opportunism

    3. Bounded rationality

    4. Information impactedness

    Problem is to elicit consummate performance (not just perfunctory performance)

    87

    Transaction cost economics interpretation of internal labour markets suggests solution is:

    Governance structure

    Problem is to elicit consummate performance (not just perfunctory performance)

    88

    In many employment situations, employees and employer are increasingly bound to one another as they develop relation-specific assets, which dulls the discipline of market forces. This can subject either side to the threat of

    exploitation or a hold-up, leading to inefficient contractual guarantees, refuse to invest in the relation, or simply refuse to contribute to the common good, fearing that any such contributions will go unreciprocated

    Asset specificity

    89

    Example:

    Your company has just paid for you to go on theEdinburgh Business School MSc in HRM.

    It is now time to return to your company and you are getting very attractive offers from alternative employers.

    What to do?

    Asking for a big raise hold up cost90

    But the threat of hold-up say, of the employee by the employer can be defeated by at least three means other than by law or contractual provision: Goodwill on the part of the employer, or an

    ethical aversion to exploiting employees A balance of power, arising from the credible

    threat by the employee to retaliate (to the extent possible) if s/he is exploited

    The desire of the employer to maintain a reputation generally among employees (and prospective employees) for not being exploitative

    Avoiding hold-up costs

  • 16

    91

    Governance in employment is efficient if decision-making authority vests in a party that:

    (a) has access to and ability to use information to make efficient decisions;

    and (b) can be trusted by the other side because, say, she has an adequate reputation stake.

    reputation and trust

    92

    Several qualifications to the balance-of-power and reputation stories must be given.1. Efficiency is a product of well-designed

    governance and cooperative expectations. Neither alone is sufficient

    2. Expectations are formed only through time, based on experience, which can make it difficult to change HR practices and policies

    3. Trust is destroyed when a party with decision-making authority can take enormous immediate advantage of the other side

    qualifications

    93

    4. Reputation faces a free-rider problem that is not always easily solved. Employees are most likely to solve the free-rider problem and sanction an exploitative employer when they are interdependent and/or proximate, socially homogenous, subject to peer pressure, or organisationally bonded (eg through common language, titles, or socialisation experiences)

    5. In both the balance-of-power and reputation stories, the contract between parties must be clear, giving a rationale for the sort of consistency discussed in Chapter 3

    qualifications

    94

    In the balance-of-power and reputation stories, the exact terms of trade are not fixed by economic factors alone, but depend on bargaining ability, expectations, social custom, and the like.

    This economic framework is silent in two important ways (dealt with in Chapter 5): It highlights the crucial importance of the

    parties expectations but offers little insight into where those expectations come from

    It is silent on the formation of things like employer and employee goodwill

    non-market influences

    95

    Psychological drives (continued)m)

    Herzbergs two-factor theory

    (motivation-hygiene theory)

    Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors

    certain motivator factors in the workplace cause job satisfaction,

    Pay may be an extrinsic hygiene factor

    achievement, competency, status, personal worth, and self-realization

    other separate set of hygiene factors (or absence of) cause dissatisfaction

    supervision, technical problems, salary, interpersonal relations on the job, and working conditions

    96

    Psychological drives (continued)Maslows hierarchy of needs

    Physiological needs

    Safety needs

    Belonging

    Esteem

    Self-actualization

    Financial security, Health,Safety

    water,

    food

    Friendship

    Family

  • 17

    97

    Goal setting/ Expectancy Theory

    Value of reward

    Reward Probability given effort

    effort

    abilities

    role

    perceptions

    Performance

    98

    Goal setting/ Expectancy Theory

    Value of reward

    Reward Probability given effort

    effort

    abilities

    role

    perceptions

    Performance

    extrinsic reward

    intrinsic reward

    Satisf-action

    99

    Value of reward

    Reward Probability given effort

    effort

    abilities

    role

    perceptions

    Performance

    extrinsic reward

    intrinsic reward

    Satisf-action

    100

    Expectancy(will performance lead to result)

    Instrumentality(will result turn into reward)

    Valence(assessment of likely satisfaction of reward)

    101

    Organisational

    Culture;

    Experience;

    Expectations;

    Alternatives

    Fairness;

    Trust;

    Delivery

    of the deal

    Citizenship;

    Commitment;

    Motivation;

    Satisfaction

    Psychological contract:

    Causes: Content: Consequencies:

    A fair days work for a fair days pay.

    We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us.102

    Employment as a Social Relation

    Employment relations are shaped by economics and by social and psychological forces.

    Process and symbolism are at least as important to effective HRM as are the content and economic values of HR practices.

    n)

  • 18

    103

    Key cognitive and social-psychological processes

    A number of cognitive and social-psychological processes are key to employment relationships:

    1. Anchoring on available and salient cognitive anchors for example, the level of performance expected by superiors often anchors the level of performance that is provided

    104

    2.Attributions about attitudes, motivations, and behaviours, based on inferences from observing our own conduct:2.1 Intrinsic motivation to do a task

    can be muted by calling conspicuous attention to extrinsic rationales for doing the task. When extrinsic rationales are absent, individuals tend to attribute effort they expend to their liking of the task or some other higher purpose, thereby enhancing commitment.

    105

    2.2 Commitment so derived escalates the longer the individual performs the task without attributing motivation to external influences.

    2.3 Intrinsic motivation is probably more prevalent than you think and represents a powerful motivational device in situations where extrinsic incentives are hard to get right.

    Making monetary rewards (e.g., bonuses) too salient can be counterproductive 106

    3. Individuals evaluate their position relative to others, in a process of social comparison:3.1 Social comparisons sometimes occur

    upward and downward, but in work settings the most common comparisons are horizontal, vis--vis others who are similar demographically, in terms of status, etc.

    3.2 Formal organisational categoriesshape the social comparisons individuals make. So organisations use categorisation processes (job levels etc.) strategically to affect outcomes and behaviour.

    107

    4. Individuals attend not only to the absolute rewards they receive, but how they fair relative to others (distributive justice) and the processes by which outcomes are determined (procedural justice):4.1 Distributive justice can be assessed

    based on ideas of equality, meeting needs, or (more prevalent in work settings) the equity principle that rewards should go to those who contribute the most.

    108

    4.2 Perceptions of procedural justice tend to rise when procedures: are based on valid criteria; are applied consistently and explained clearly by competent individuals; reinforce organisational values and culture; do not denigrate the individual; and involve participation and a right of appeal.

  • 19

    109

    5. Reciprocity and gift exchange the desire to reciprocate gifts in kind can be a powerful force for eliciting consummate effort from employees. The nature of the gift and the situations of the gift giver and receiver all affect the extent to which a gift is perceived as such.

    110

    6. Status inconsistency occupying discrepant positions on multiple organisational and/or social hierarchies can have negative effect. Unnecessary status conflicts should be avoided; where they are necessary or unavoidable, artificial means for reinforcing the desired status hierarchy can help (e.g., low badge numbers denoting long-tenure at Apple).

    Pay, authority level, and technical expertise should balance where possible

    111

    7. An important source of organisational inertia is a need for legitimacy in organisational practices (building trust through consistency). Constant change de-legitimises practices.

    This organisational inertia can be regarded as a legitimation cost.

    112

    113

    1. labour rates are the same as labour costs.

    2. cutting labour rates will lower labour costs.

    3. labour costs represent a large portion of a company's total costs.

    4. keeping labour costs low creates a potent and sustainable competitive edge.

    5. individual incentive pay improves performance.

    6. people work primarily for the money.

    Jeffrey Pfeffer: Six Dangerous Myths About Pay (HBR May/June 1998)

    114

    Closed system theory

    Closed system The managerial role is limited:

    just respond to the conditions.

  • 20

    115

    Criticisms of closed system theory

    Fails to explain observed variations to similar groups across system all other things equal is ambiguous in day-

    to-day practice - becomes messy. Most people dont behave this way because of bounded knowledge need to earn an income for living costs.

    People read signals conveyed by extrinsic reward regarding what an organisation regards as

    important and may use wage to reinforce higher-order senses such as self-esteem.

    116

    Open systems perspective

    Pay rate

    Supply

    Demand

    Competition in labour market

    117

    Open systems perspective

    Pay rate

    Supply

    Demand

    Competition in labour market

    Education

    Training

    decisions

    Behavioural expectations

    Household work-life constraints

    118

    Open systems perspective

    Pay rate

    Supply

    Demand

    Competition in labour market

    Education

    Training

    decisions

    Behavioural expectations

    Household work-life constraints

    Institutional:

    legal + social norms

    trade unions etc..

    119

    Open systems perspective

    Pay rate

    Supply

    Demand

    Competition in labour market

    Education

    Training

    decisions

    Behavioural expectations

    Household work-life constraints

    Institutional:

    legal + social norms

    trade unions etc..

    Management input

    Efficiency wages

    Principal-agent incentives etc. 120

    Benefits Complementary skills and experiences Greater flexibility Social benefits -- fun and commitment Less resistant to change

    Costs Coordination costs Personal discomfort and conflict Diffusion of responsibility, free riders Increased risk seeking

    Costs/ Benefits of Teams

  • 21

    121

    Principal-Agent Relationship: Principal (owner) wants hard working employeeEmployee wants a pleasant life

    Supervision

    Pay for PerformanceIncentive alignment

    About Teams

    122

    Free-Rider Problem in teams: Team of 10 Share productive effort My effort in the next hour costs me 50 My effort in the next hour creates 100 value My slacking has opportunity costs = 10 Incentive to slack as become free rider

    About Teams

    123

    Note on last example: If I slack and no one else does

    I get 90 for an hour of slacking If everyone else slacks and I work

    I get 10 for an hour of work and that hour cost me 50So I net -40 on the experience

    If everyone else slacks and I slack I get zero

    About Teams

    124

    Prisoners Dilemma:

    Others Work

    Others Slack

    I work (50,50) (-40,10)

    I slack (90,40) ( 0, 0)

    (My net pay-off, net pay-off of representative other team member)

    About Teams

    125

    So why work in teams?! The whole is greater than the sum of the parts (lifting) Specialization (Adam Smith) Knowledge Transfer (hold-up costs and opportunism)Appropriate measurements Widespread information sharing Individual and group rewards

    About Teams

    126

    Necessary expenditure on employee reward

  • 22

    127

    Issue Theory Source Comment

    Wage Market clearingNeo-classical economics Closed system

    Attraction of skilled labour Human capital

    Institutional economics

    Premium to skills / experience

    Control and retention

    Exchange theory,Efficiency wages

    Institutional economics, Bargaining to limit

    instrumental behaviour

    StabilityInternal labour market;Rent sharing

    Institutional economics,Industrial relations

    Large private firms or public sector

    Incentives Tournaments Managerial economics Premium on talent128

    Management influence on work attitudes and behaviour that arises form employee reward

    129

    Issue Theory Source Comment

    Employee discretion Role Sociology Vague

    Managerial control Agency

    Labour Economics Alignment of interests

    Employee satisfaction Drive theories

    Managerial psychology Job enrichment versus

    reward

    Learning/ training

    Reinforcement theory

    Managerial psychology Danger of damaging implicit

    contract

    Incentive for future oriented effort

    Expectancy theory

    Managerial psychology

    Signals as credible information

    Informational signals

    Cognitive evaluation theory

    Managerial psychology

    Continuous effort-reward bargaining is ongoing 130

    Fair returns to investment in human capital with employer

    131

    Issue Theory Source Comment

    Perceptions of organisational justice

    Distributive/Procedural/InterpersonalJustice

    Political science,Sociology

    Attention to process as much as to substance of employee reward

    Trust in employer to honour implicit expectations

    Psychological contract theory

    Managerial psychology

    Need to avoid damaging employees implicit expectations

    132

    Report in People Management (June 2008) accessed by following the Internet hyperlink: http://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/pm/articles/2008/06/long-term-pay-deals-a-safe-choice-in-uncertain-times.htm

    prompts consideration of the way employers and employees may be theorising the implications of pay-rate-setting over the short versus medium term, when concerns exist related to economic uncertainty.

    Exercise:

    Reflect on the apparent indications that people in the public and private sectors are adopting alternative employee reward determination theories.

  • 23

    133

    Summary

    A rationale for practical theory on employee reward

    Closed system theory and its critics Interactive open perspectives on reward

    setting Theories on level of reward to be set Theories on managerial influence through

    reward Theories on principles of organisational

    justice and the balance between explicit and implicit contracts