Reverberation Chamber System Validation and Verification John Ladbury, Principal Investigator Galen Koepke, Project Leader (Retired) Perry Wilson, Group Leader: RF Fields Group 2018-03-22
Reverberation Chamber System Validation and Verification
John Ladbury, Principal InvestigatorGalen Koepke, Project Leader (Retired)
Perry Wilson, Group Leader: RF Fields Group
2018-03-22
2
Outline
• About NIST
• Ideal Reverberation Chamber Characteristics
• Validation and Verification Plan
• Loaded Chamber Uniformity
• Fields and Field Probes
• Empty Chamber Evaluation
• Signal Quality Evaluation
3
About NIST (Organization)
NIST: National Institute of Standards and TechnologyDedicated to measurement science, rigorous traceability, development and use of standards
CTL: Communications Technology LabAdvances the measurement science underlying wireless technologies
RF Technology DivisionDevelops theory, metrology and standards for the technologies upon which the future of wireless communications depends.
RF Fields Group: Measures, characterizes, and calibrates antennas and radiated fields
4
RF Fields Group
Principal traceability path for rf field probe calibration in the US
Over 40 years of experience in reverberation chamber research
Helped establish international standards for calibrating and performing measurements in reverberation chambers
5
Ideal Reverberation Chamber Characteristics
• Antenna placement unimportant.
• Probe placement unimportant.
• Test artifact/animal placement unimportant.
• Orientation is unimportant
6
Validation and verification plan
• Uniformity (temperature in phantoms, probe field, antenna power)
• Note: cannot directly measure SAR
• Field probe/chamber calibration
• Signal quality
7
Validations Performed:
• December, 2007 after initial installation
• April, 2012 after pre-chronic and thermal pilot studies
• May, 2015 well after all tests complete, and system had been off for around 1 year
8
Loaded Chamber Uniformity
Replace 1 cage with an antenna at random orientation.Measure average received power during continuous paddle rotation.Repeat at 20 cage positions.Standard deviation 1.3 dBRange 2.5 dB
9
RF Field Probes and calibration
Calibration Procedure for each axis1. Generate known signal
GSM, CDMA, …
2. Measure forward and reflected power.3. Radiate signal using known antenna.4. Compute field based on radiated power.5. Measure probe response6. Repeat over multiple levels to deal with
nonlinear response.
Standard uncertainty: 0.4 dB or 10 % in power
IT’IS calibration is very similar.
10
Types of fields
Electric and Magnetic, also know as E-fields and H-fields. (proportional in RC)
Cartesian components: aligned with x-axis ( 𝐸𝐸𝑥𝑥 ), y-axis (𝐸𝐸𝑦𝑦), and/or z-axis (𝐸𝐸𝑧𝑧)Depends on orientation
Total Electric Field = 𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇= 𝐸𝐸𝑥𝑥 2 + 𝐸𝐸𝑦𝑦2 + 𝐸𝐸𝑧𝑧 2 (independent of orientation)
SAR is proportional to 𝐸𝐸𝑇𝑇2 = 𝐸𝐸𝑥𝑥 2 + 𝐸𝐸𝑦𝑦2 + 𝐸𝐸𝑧𝑧 2
11
Empty Chamber evaluation
Measure received power on NIST antenna and Spectrum Analyzer, field on NIST E probe, IT’IS E probe, and IT’IS H probe at 100 discrete paddle positions.
Convert all measurements to squared total E field using known equations.
Compare averages in each chamber with a target field
12
Single-axis field comparison: 2007
10
100
1000
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 19 20 21
Chamber
Estim
ated
Tot
al F
ield
(V/m
)
IT'IS ExIT'IS EyIT'IS EzIT'IS HxIT'IS HyIT'IS HzNIST ExNIST EyNIST EzNIST AntennaGoal
CDMAMice
GSMMaleRats
CDMAMaleRats
Note:Field levels change over time due to animal growth, although SAR remains constant.
No entries for sham chambers.
13
Single-axis deviation from goal: 2007
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 19 20 21
Chamber
Dev
iatio
n fr
om G
oal (
dB)
IT'IS Ex IT'IS Ey IT'IS Ez
IT'IS Hx IT'IS Hy IT'IS Hz
NIST Ex NIST Ey NIST Ez
NIST Antenna Goal
14
Total field comparison: 2007
10
100
1000
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 19 20 21
Chamber
Mea
sure
d To
tal F
ield
(V/m
)
IT'IS EtIT'IS HtNIST EtGoal
15
Total field deviation from goal: 2007
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 19 20 21
Chamber
Dev
iatio
n fr
om G
oal (
dB)
IT'IS Et IT'IS Ht NIST Et
Goal Uncertainty
GSM Male Rats GSM Female Rats
16
CDF’s of single-axis field measurement: 2007
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 150
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Cum
ulat
ive
Prob
abili
ty
Normalized Total Field (dB V/m)
Chamber 17, H-Field Probe
Chamber 16, H-Field Probe
Chamber 5, H-Field Probe
Chamber 6, H-Field Probe
All GSM Rat chambers
17
A closer look at Chamber 6: High Male Rat GSM 2007
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Cum
ulat
ive P
roba
bilit
y
Normalized field (dB V/m)
Clipping
IT'IS H-Field Probe Axes
IT'IS E-Field Probe Axes
NIST E-Field Probe Axes
NIST Antenna
_______
_______
_______
_______
18
Single-axis deviation from goal: 2012
19
Total field deviation from goal: 2012
20
CDF’s of single-axis field measurement: 2012
21
A closer look at Chamber 6: High Male Rat GSM 2012
22
Single-axis deviation from goal: 2015
Zeroing units in chambers 3 and 20 had failed. Data review showed no problems in chamber 20 during tests, but chamber 3 had issues for last 6 months of test.
23
Total field deviation from goal: 2015
No issues seen in measurements of total electric field.
24
CDF’s of single-axis field measurement: 2015
25
Signal distortion
All transmitted signals have some distortionRegulations focused on preventing interference with users of adjacent spectrum.Limited guidance in main signal band.
26
High-power GSM emissions, Chamber 6 (male rat)
27
High-power GSM emissions, Chamber 11 (mouse)
28
High-Power CDMA Spectra Chambers 11 (mouse) and 7 (m rat)
29
High-power GSM in time domain
0 2 4 6 8 10-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Mea
sure
d O
utpu
t Pow
er (d
Bm
)
Chamber 6, GSM, High Power
30
Overall Summary
Loaded chamber uniformity: standard deviation of 1.3 dB.
Some unusual probe behavior observed in high-power chambers for H field probes, improved for thermal pilot and prechronic, fixed for chronic tests.
After chronic tests, two zeroing units had failed. One had been working during chronic tests, the other failed approximately 6 months before end of chronic tests. Negligible impact on estimation of the total E field.
Signal quality within standard parameters for communications standards.