Top Banner
Return Torque Micro- Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams
21

Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit

Scott Kruse

Jared Smith

Jacob Reese

John Anderson

Cherrod Williams

Page 2: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Overview• Project Introduction

• Design Requirements

• Concept Generation/Selection

• Design Progression

• Material/Magnetic Selection

• Large-Scale Prototype Construction

– FDM (Rapid Prototyping)

– Magnetic Construction

– Assembly

• Results

• Future Work

Page 3: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Project Introduction

• Design Statement: •Design of a micro return torque bearing for actuation purposes through the use of permanent magnets

• Design Specifics:•When an external torque is applied to the bearing, the bearing reacts by producing an opposing torque.•Once the external torque is removed, the bearing returns to its initial position.•Traditionally accomplished with springs.

Page 4: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Design RequirementsDegrees of Travel 15

Max Torque .001 in-lb @ 15 degrees displacement

Torque Requirement Monotonic (no max/min between end

points)

Max Diameter .1 in

Max Thickness .06 in

Page 5: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Proposed Concepts

Shaft/pin

Rotational Magnetic Pair

Axial Magnetic PairAxial Magnetic Pair

Grounded Outer Bearing Surface

Inner Bearing(attached to pin)

Page 6: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Initial Chosen Concept

• Variant of Concept 3• Allows multiple

moment arms• Repeatable/expandable

geometry• Travel limiter inherent

in design• Simple, balanced and

symmetric

Page 7: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Design Progression

• More robust design

• Added magnetic material to produce necessary torque

• Uses only repulsive forces to generate return torque

– Better model of a spring

Page 8: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Chosen Material: Polysilicon• Stronger than steel• Low coefficient of friction• Extremely flexible• Directly compatible with modern IC fabrication• Used extensively in micro-machining

Page 9: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Magnetic Selection

*Sintered NeFeB 48 was chosen for our application.

Page 10: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Torque Results

Torque vs. Angular Displacement

0

0.0002

0.0004

0.0006

0.0008

0.001

0.0012

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Angular Displacement (degrees)

To

rqu

e (i

n-l

b)

Page 11: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Field Visualization

Page 12: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Geometry Results (inches)

Page 13: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Results SummaryDegrees of Travel 15

Max Torque .001 in-lb @ 15 degrees displacement

Monotonic Torque? Yes

Diameter .08 in

Thickness .06 in

Page 14: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Construction of Large-Scale Prototype

Page 15: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

Rapid Prototyping Process

– Adds layers of material instead of subtracting

– Can construct complicated geometries

– Fast turn around from CAD files to working prototypes

– Utilizes ABS plastic

Page 16: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Prototyping Process

Page 17: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Magnet Construction

• Purchased small Neodymium magnets• Set magnets in blocks of resin of the necessary

geometry

Page 18: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Assembly

•Cut Plexiglas to required diameter •Epoxied magnetic blocks in the appropriate locations•Completed the assembly by adding the parts created through FDM

Page 19: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Prototype Results

Page 20: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Future Work

• Research attachment details for the micro-scale

• Run cost/benefit analysis for the replacement of springs with permanent magnets

• Apply design on the micro-scale

Page 21: Return Torque Micro-Bearing Refit Scott Kruse Jared Smith Jacob Reese John Anderson Cherrod Williams.

Acknowledgements

• Dr. Masson• Dr. Gielisse• Dr. Luongo• Gary the Prototype

Guy• Ron Wild and Dr.

Greenwood