Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.

Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4

Dr. Frank SummersSpace Telescope Science Institute

April 2, 2009

2

A Space Telescope

3

4

Artist’s Illustration

WRONG

Photograph

CORRECT

5

Size of Earth

Size of Earth’s Atmosphere

6400 km

600 km above surface

Size of Hubble’s Orbit

100 km above surface

6

7

8

Some Hubble History

9

• 1946 – Space telescope proposed

• 1962 – National Academy of Sciences recommends

Lyman Spitzer

• 1976 – NASA & ESA collaborate• 1977 – Congress funds project• 1985 – Construction complete• 1986 – Challenger accident

10

• 1990 – Launch• 1993 – Servicing Mission 1• 1997 – Servicing Mission 2• 1997 – Mission extended

from 15 to 20 years• 1999 – Servicing Mission 3A• 2002 – Servicing Mission 3B• 2003 – Columbia accident• 2004 – No shuttle mission?• 2005 – Two gyro mode• 2006 – “One final house

call”• 2008 – Hardware delay

11

What Makes Hubble So Great?

12

• Clear View – located above blurring effects of atmosphere

13

• Serviceable – new instruments every few years keeps it current

14

• Public – Observers get only one year of exclusive access

15

• Professional – STScI provides excellent support to scientists

16

Houston, We Have a Problem

17

18

19

20

21

22

Hubble Servicing Missions

23

Servicing Mission 1 – December 1993

• COSTAR, WFPC2

• solar arrays, gyros

24

Servicing Mission 2 – February 1997

• NICMOS, STIS

• fine guidance sensor, solid state recorder, reaction wheel assembly

25

Servicing Mission 3A – December 1999

• gyroscope failure in November

• computer, data recorder, fine guidance sensor, electronics improvement, thermal protection

26

Servicing Mission 3B – March 2002

• ACS

• solar arrays, NICMOS cooling system, reaction wheel assembly, power control unit

27

Servicing Mission 4 – May 2009

• WFC3, COS

• ACS repair, STIS repair, gyros, batteries, fine guidance sensor, thermal blanket, de-orbit module

28

Servicing Mission 4 – May 2009

• WFC3, COS

• ACS repair, STIS repair, gyros, batteries, fine guidance sensor, thermal blanket, de-orbit module

29

30

1990

31

1993

32

1997

33

2002

34

2009

35

Hubble, We Have an Anomaly

36

37

38

SM4: An Ambitious Workload

39

SM4: An Ambitious Workload

“This final mission will be, without doubt, the most complicated and challenging that NASA has ever mounted.”

40

Major Goals for SM4

1 Enhance Hubble’s scientific capabilities with a new camera and new spectrograph• WFC3, a panchromatic camera, replacing WFPC2

• COS, a very efficient spectrograph, replacing COSTAR

2 Restore existing Hubble capability through in-situ repair• STIS: repair failed electronics

• ACS: repair failed electronics

3 Upgrade Hubble to last to beyond 2014• Install refurbished Fine Guidance Sensor

• Install 6 new gyros

• Install 6 new batteries

• Install thermal protection covers

• Install Capture Mechanism for de-orbit mission

If successful, HST will be at the height of its power,

with 6 working, complementary, science instruments

41

NOTE: Now that SM4 is officially manifested and a crew has been assigned, the EVA timeline is controlled by the Space Shuttle Program.

42

Wide Field Camera 3

– WFC3…

43

Wide Field Camera 3

• WFC3 has two wide field cameras– near ultraviolet and optical imaging

(UVIS)– near infrared imaging camera (IR)

• First truly panchromatic camera• Improves on ACS & NICMOS

– UVIS >30x discovery power of ACS/WFPC2– IR 15-20x discovery power of NICMOS

44

Camera Comparison

45

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph

47

Cosmic Origins Spectrograph

• COS optimized for ultraviolet observations• Far Ultraviolet Channel

– 1-reflection, aberration-corrected along dispersion– 2 side-by-side 16k by 1k pixel detector (FUSE design)– Records arrival time of every detected photon– 3 gratings; 300 or 800 (nm) spectral range– Resolving power ~3000, ~20,000 [115 to 205 nm]

• Near Ultraviolet Channel– Fully corrected optical design– 1k by 1k pixel detector (STIS design)– Records arrival time of every detected photon– 4 gratings– 10 to 80 nanometers spectral ranges– Resolving power ~2000, ~20,000 [170 to 320 nm]

48

COS vs STIS

Limiting Flux for S/N=10 in 3600 sec (R~10,000 (0.15 Ǻ) binning)

-15.5

-15.0

-14.5

-14.0

-13.5

-13.0

-12.5

1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

Wavelength (Ǻ)

log

Flu

x (

erg

cm

-2 s

ec-1

Ǻ-1)

STIS E140MR=45,000

STIS G140MR~11,000-17,000

COS G130MR~20,000-24,000

COS G160MR~20,000-24,000

49

ACS Repair

• Advanced Camera for Surveys• ACS failure in January 2007• Cut through a grill• Similar to WFC3, but …

50

STIS Repair

• Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph

• STIS failure in August 2002• > 100 fasteners• Similar to COS, but …

51

Gyros

• 3 gyros operating is nominal• 2 gyro mode since 2005• 3 failed, 2 operating, 1 spare

52

Gyros installed in SM3A

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

RR

RR

Solid blue = run tim e @ SM3BSlant blue = run tim e @ 9/17/07Red = run tim e @ pre-SM3B failureSlant red = run tim e @ pos t-SM3B failureRR = rotor res triction failure

Gyros in HST at completion of SM1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

Ru

n-t

ime

in

Ye

ars

FL

FL

FL

FL

Solid blue = run tim e @ SM2Slant blue = run tim e @ SM3ARed = run tim e @ failureFL = flex lead failure

50% failure probability

75% failure probability

95% failure probability

ON

OFF

FL

ON

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6

53

Batteries

• Hubble can not point without batteries

• About 100,000 charge-discharge cycles

54

55

56

Bay 8 Thermal Situation

BAY9

BAY8

SM3B Survey

57

Bay 8 Thermal Situation•Patched during SM2, however expected to

be completely degraded

PATCHBAY 7 BAY 8

58

Bay 8 Thermal Situation

59

• Possible severe scheduling impacts

Possible Bay 8 Impacts

60

SM4 Preparations

61

62

HFMS Fit Check

63

HFMS Fit Check

64

ASIPE Fit Check

65

66

67

68

HST equipment at KSC

69

May 12, 2009

70

71