RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THE RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THE LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL COMMODITIES COMMODITIES John E. Tilton John E. Tilton Colorado School of Mines and Colorado School of Mines and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Email: [email protected]Email: [email protected]Birkbeck, University of London October 17, 2012
38
Embed
RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THE LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL COMMODITIES
RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THE LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL COMMODITIES. John E. Tilton Colorado School of Mines and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Email: [email protected] Birkbeck, University of London October 17, 2012. PURPOSE & SCOPE. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THERESOURCE DEPLETION AND THELONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL
COMMODITIES COMMODITIES
John E. TiltonJohn E. TiltonColorado School of Mines and Colorado School of Mines and
• Explore the threat of depletion to the Explore the threat of depletion to the long-run availability of mineral long-run availability of mineral commoditiescommodities• Mostly conceptual. Few definitive Mostly conceptual. Few definitive forecastsforecasts• Focus on depletion alone and not other Focus on depletion alone and not other threatsthreats
OVERVIEWOVERVIEW
I.I. Nature & perceptions of depletionNature & perceptions of depletionII.II. Cumulative availability curveCumulative availability curveIII.III. Petroleum Petroleum IV.IV. LithiumLithiumV.V. Conclusions and implicationsConclusions and implications
I. NATURE OF DEPLETION:I. NATURE OF DEPLETION:TWO COMMON VIEWSTWO COMMON VIEWS
• The fixed stock paradigmThe fixed stock paradigm• The opportunity cost paradigmThe opportunity cost paradigm
Opportunity Cost ParadigmOpportunity Cost ParadigmShortcomings of PriceShortcomings of Price
• Factors other than depletion affect prices (mostly in short run)
• Environmental and other external costs (levels vs trends)
• Future prices unknown
Opportunity Cost Versus Fixed Opportunity Cost Versus Fixed Stock ParadigmsStock Paradigms
• Despite the problems with price, opportunity cost paradigm more useful way of assessing the threat of depletion
Implications for DepletionImplications for Depletion
1. Scarcity not inevitable: A race between the cost-increasing effects of depletion and the cost-reducing effects of new technology
2. Availability can increase over time, and has in the past for some mineral goods
3. Threat is economic depletion - higher costs and prices curtailing demand - not physical depletion
Implications for DepletionImplications for Depletion
4. Probably not a surprise, time to respond
5. Focus on cost and price trends, not life expectancies
III. CUMULATIVE AVAILABILITY III. CUMULATIVE AVAILABILITY CURVECURVE
• Shows total quantity available at various prices over all time
• Scarcity (measured by costs and prices) depends on:– Movement up curve
– Shifts in curve
– Slope and shape of curve
• USBM efforts in 1970s and 1980s
• CAC is not a traditional supply curve
Cumulative primary output
Priceandcosts
Other More Troubling ShapesOther More Troubling Shapes
Cumulative primary output
Cumulative primary output
Priceandcosts
Priceandcosts
Copper and the Skinner Copper and the Skinner HypothesisHypothesis
GradeGrade
Amount of metal available at a given grade
Amount of metal available at a given grade
Source: Skinner (1976)
Unimodal Bimodal
Copper and the Skinner Copper and the Skinner HypothesisHypothesis
104
Ore grade, %Cu
Sulfide ores
107
The mineralogical barrier
106
105
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Energy, BTU/lb of copper
Common rocks
Source: Skinner (1976)
Another Cause of Jumps in CACAnother Cause of Jumps in CAC
• Demand exceeds byproduct Demand exceeds byproduct supply requiring much more supply requiring much more costly main product productioncostly main product production
• Shape of the curveShape of the curve• Nature and incidence of mineralization• Other geologic factors
• Movement up the curveMovement up the curve– Growth in metal consumption (consumer
preferences, conservation, material substitution)
– Recycling• Shifts in the curveShifts in the curve
– Changes in input costs– Cost-reducing technological change
2. Questions Some Common Beliefs2. Questions Some Common Beliefs
• Population growthPopulation growth• Renewable resourcesRenewable resources• Resource use in developed Resource use in developed countriescountries
3. Assessing the Future3. Assessing the FutureThreat of DepletionThreat of Depletion
• When shape of CAC is benign – depletion is not a problem
• When shape is not benign – depletion may or may not be a threat
• Requires actual estimation of CAC Cumulative primary output
Priceandcosts
IV. PETROLEUMIV. PETROLEUM
Roberto F. Aguilera and others, 2009. Roberto F. Aguilera and others, 2009. ““Depletion and future availability of Depletion and future availability of petroleum resources,petroleum resources,”” Energy Energy Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 141-174Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 141-174
ApproachApproach
• Extends two USGS studies – National Oil Extends two USGS studies – National Oil and Gas Assessment (1995) and World and Gas Assessment (1995) and World Petroleum Assessment (2000)Petroleum Assessment (2000)• Estimates resources from Estimates resources from
• Unassessed provinces (using a Variable Shape Distribution model)
• Estimates production costsEstimates production costs• Many explicit assumptionsMany explicit assumptions
Life ExpectanciesLife Expectancies
Years at 0% DD Growth
Years at 2% DD Growth
Years at 5% DD Growth
ConventionalPetroleum
151 70 43
Conventional and
UnconventionalPetroleum
651 132 70
FindingsFindings
• Quantity of conventional petroleum Quantity of conventional petroleum greater than often assumedgreater than often assumed• Use of unconventional petroleum Use of unconventional petroleum does not cause a big jump in CACdoes not cause a big jump in CAC• Price not likely to rise sharply in Price not likely to rise sharply in near future due to depletionnear future due to depletion• Hard landing unlikely even if Hard landing unlikely even if conventional oil production peaksconventional oil production peaks
V. LITHIUMV. LITHIUM
Andrés Yaksic and John E. Tilton, Andrés Yaksic and John E. Tilton, 2009. 2009. ““Using the cumulative Using the cumulative availability curves to assess the threat availability curves to assess the threat of mineral depletion: The case of of mineral depletion: The case of lithium,lithium,”” Resources Policy, Vol. 24, pp. Resources Policy, Vol. 24, pp. 185-194185-194
ConcernConcern
• Lithium batteries for hybrid and full Lithium batteries for hybrid and full electric automobileselectric automobiles• Demand growth could exceed Demand growth could exceed available resourcesavailable resources• Perhaps R&D should be redirectedPerhaps R&D should be redirected
ApproachApproach
• Literature review and interviews to Literature review and interviews to identify known resources and their identify known resources and their production costsproduction costs• No attempt to estimate undiscovered No attempt to estimate undiscovered resources. So new discoveries can resources. So new discoveries can cause CAC to shift downwardcause CAC to shift downward• Demand scenariosDemand scenarios
Types of Lithium ResourcesTypes of Lithium Resources
• BrinesBrines• Hard rock mineral depositsHard rock mineral deposits• ClaysClays• Seawater Seawater
Lithium from SeawaterLithium from Seawater
• Huge resource - 44.8 billion tons at Huge resource - 44.8 billion tons at 20% recovery rate20% recovery rate• Cost estimates based on 1975 study Cost estimates based on 1975 study by Steinberg and Dang at Brookhaven by Steinberg and Dang at Brookhaven National Lab updated for inflation – National Lab updated for inflation – $7-10 per pound of lithium carbonate$7-10 per pound of lithium carbonate
Estimated Lithium CACEstimated Lithium CAC
FindingsFindings
• Depletion will not be a problemDepletion will not be a problem• Conventional sources sufficient for Conventional sources sufficient for the rest of this century and beyondthe rest of this century and beyond• Lithium from seawater is a huge Lithium from seawater is a huge source of potential supply and only source of potential supply and only raises costs of lithium used in autos raises costs of lithium used in autos from $42 to $150from $42 to $150
V. CONCLUSIONS AND V. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSIMPLICATIONS
• Threat of depletion depends on Threat of depletion depends on three sets of determinantsthree sets of determinants• Movement up and shifts in CAC Movement up and shifts in CAC unknown and unknowableunknown and unknowable• Shape of CAC (though often Shape of CAC (though often unknown) is knowableunknown) is knowable• Knowledge of the shape can Knowledge of the shape can provide useful insights concerning provide useful insights concerning the future threat of depletionthe future threat of depletion
RESOURCE DEPLETION AND THERESOURCE DEPLETION AND THELONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL LONG-RUN AVAILABILITY OF MINERAL
COMMODITIES COMMODITIES
John E. TiltonJohn E. TiltonColorado School of Mines and Colorado School of Mines and