7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
1/30
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
2/30
Investigating the Use ofAnaerobic Fermentation
on Pretreated Biomass toStreamline Bio-fuel
Production
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
3/30
Table of ContentsPurpose ____________________________________________________________________________ 1
Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ 1
Figure 1: World Ethanol Production: 2007-2011 __________________________________________ 1
Figure 2: Greenhouse Gas Reductions __________________________________________________ 3
Figure 3: Biofuels Lifecycle Emissions ___________________________________________________ 3
History _____________________________________________________________________________ 4
Figure 4: Ethanol Net Returns and Corn Prices ____________________________________________ 5
Methods and Materials ________________________________________________________________ 6
Acid pretreatment__________________________________________________________________ 6
Acid hydrolysis Determination of Klason lignin __________________________________________ 6
Figure 5: Mixing Sulfuric Acid into Biomass ______________________________________________ 7
Figure 6: Verifying Neutral pH of Klason lignin ____________________________________________ 8
Figure 7: Formula for Determining Klason Lignin __________________________________________ 8
Determination of Carbohydrate Content ________________________________________________ 9
Figure 8: Glucose and Xylose Percentages ______________________________________________ 10
Introduction of Bacteria to Facilitate Ethanol Production __________________________________ 10
Figure 9: Boiling to Remove Oxygen ___________________________________________________ 11
Fi 10 Addi S l i A l d M di 12
http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068312http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068313http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068314http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068316http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068320http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068321http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068322http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068324http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068326http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068327http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068327http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068326http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068324http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068322http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068321http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068320http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068316http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068314http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068313http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc3490683127/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
4/30
Figure A3: Trace Element Formula _____________________________________________________ 2
Figure A4: Selenium Tungsten Solution ________________________________________________ 2
Figure A5: Vitamin Formula __________________________________________________________ 2
Figure A6: Sodium Sulfide Solution _____________________________________________________ 2
Figure A7: Glucose and Xylose Percentages ______________________________________________ 2
Figure A8: HPLC Results Ethanol Content ________________________________________________ 2
Figure A9: Klason Lignin Content ______________________________________________________ 2
Figure A10: Average Ethanol Content ___________________________________________________ 2
Figure A11: Comparison of Ethanol Content 2012 and 2013 _________________________________ 2
http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068340http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068341http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068341http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068341http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068342http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068343http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068344http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068345http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068346http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068347http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068348http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068348http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068347http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068346http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068345http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068344http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068343http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068342http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc349068341http://c/Users/DEDA/Documents/00-Jonah/00-Science%20Fair%202012-2013/Research%20Paper/Research%20Paper.docx%23_Toc3490683407/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
5/30
PurposeThe purpose of this investigation was to determine if anaerobic fermentation
could be utilized as a feasible method to produce ethanol biofuel; and which of the
bacteria in the trials, Clostridium thermocellum, Clostridium thermolactium, or a co-
culture using equal parts of both microorganisms would produce the most ethanol.
IntroductionThe United States is the largest producer of ethanol fuel, producing 15.2 billion
gallons in 2012. The USA and Brazil produce most of the worlds ethanol fuel, as
shown in Figure 1: (Source: F. O Licht, cited in Renewable Fuels Association, Ethanol
Industry Outlook 2008-2012 reports.)
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
6/30
The USA uses corn while Brazil uses sugarcane as primary glucose sources to
produce ethanol. Brazil has aggressively promoted the use of ethanol fuel; Brazilian
law has required an ethanol-gasoline blend since 1986 and a 25-percent blend of
ethanol to gasoline since 2007, although this dropped to 20% in 2010 because of
diminished production of sugar cane crops. In the United States, Portland, Oregon (in
July of 2006) became the first American city to require that all gasoline sold within the
city limits be blended with at least ten percent ethanol. Although federal clean air laws
do not require the sale of E10 ethanol blends, they do mandate specific amounts of
ethanol be used in each state, to be decided by the state. This requirement may be met
with E10, E15, E20, or E85. In 2011, the 133.93 billion gallons of gasoline (3.19 billion
barrels) consumed in the United States contained about 12.87 billion gallons of ethanol,
accounting for nine percent of the volume of gasoline consumed. (U.S. Energy
Information Administration)
Ethanol reduces gasoline prices: After subtracting the cost of subsidies, ethanol
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
7/30
In 2011, the production and use of 13.9 billion gallons of ethanol in the U.S.
reduced CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions by 25.3 million tons, the equivalent
to removing four million vehicles from America's roadways. (Source: Argonne National
Laboratory's GREET Model).
Figure 2: Greenhouse Gas Reductions
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
8/30
Ethanol feeds livestock: About one third of the cellulose can be recovered to
produce animal feed.
HistoryHenry Fords first vehicles ran on ethanol, as did most of the farm equipment of
the time. Because it was cheaper than gasoline, it remained the fuel of choice until
1901 when the Texas oil fields were discovered, which dropped the cost of gasoline
below ethanol.
In the mid-seventies, the octane-boosting lead additive used in gasoline was
discovered to be a dangerous pollutant, so it was replaced with methyl tertiary-butyl
ether (MTBE). Due to studies that discovered MTBE in groundwater and showed it to
be carcinogenic, ethanol was substituted as an oxygenator in gasoline starting with
California in 2003. Since then, E10 gas (10% ethanol-gasoline blend of fuel) has
become the conventional fuel and gasoline without ethanol is now atypical and is
difficult to find.
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
9/30
Cellulosic ethanol could be considered a stable source because it is created
solely from waste. Today, most of the ethanol biofuel created in the United States is
made from corn kernels. Aside from the fluctuating costs, this creates a conflict with
food production, and raises questions about the advisability of using arable land for
anything but food when there is a world need for more food production. This is where
cellulosic ethanol can step in to fill the void with a desperately needed alterative to
ethanol produced from corn. If the obstacles to cheap, clean cellulosic ethanol
production can be resolved, then a superior, renewable energy source will be available
Figure 4: Ethanol Net Returns and Corn Prices
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
10/30
Cellulosic ethanol production has remained a much-studied science because the
rewards can be substantial. According to former Energy Secretary, Samuel Bodman,
"Cellulosic ethanol contains more net energy and emits significantly fewer greenhouse
gases than ethanol made from corn"
Methods and MaterialsThis research examined the residue from a Zea mays L. (corn) crop. Called,
corn stover, it consists of the plants left in the field after harvesting, which includes the
leaves, stalks, husks and cobs.
Acid pretreatment
The biomass samples were cut into small pieces and dehydrated in a drying oven set at
149 Celsius. Once dried, the biomass was crushed in a grinder until the particles were
approximately the size of 50 microns. A five-gram sample of the biomass was collected
and a one-percent sulfuric acid (H2SO4) solution was introduced into it. The treated
biomass was placed in a metal cylinder that had been forcefully tightened to allow
pressure to build up in it It was placed in a 120 degree Celsius oil bath for 45 minutes
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
11/30
After the acid was thoroughly mixed with the biomass; the beaker, with the glass
rod, was placed in a vacuum desiccator for 15 minutes to facilitate wetting and
dispersion. After dispersion, the beaker was covered with aluminum foil and placed in a
water bath at 30 degrees Celsius for 60 minutes and the biomass was stirred frequently
with the glass rod. The beaker was removed and 84 mL of deionized water was added
to dilute the concentration of H2SO4 to 3.0 percent. Four calibration solutions were
prepared containing five monosaccharides (glucose xylose galactose arabinose and
Figure 5: Mixing Sulfuric Acid into Biomass
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
12/30
acid-insoluble lignin (Klason lignin). The lignin was washed with hot water to remove
the acid, and a neutral pH was verified with a pH paper.
The filter papers with the lignin were dried in an over at 105 Celsius overnight or
to a constant weight, then cooled in a desiccator and weighed. After the samples
l d t t t th filt t t i i th h id d th id
Figure 6: Verifying Neutral pH of Klason lignin
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
13/30
Determination of Carbohydrate Content
The filtrate, containing the monosaccharides and the acid-soluble lignin, was
tested to determine the percentages of glucose and xylose using the High-Performance
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): To begin, the HPLC was calibrated by running pure
samples of glucose and xylose.
To prepare the filtrate samples to be run through the HPLC, the liquid from each
sample was filtered through a .45 m membrane into a small glass vial that is specially
designed for the HPLC. The samples were placed in the HPLC at specific locations that
identified them by untreated 1 or 2 or treated 1 or2, samples; and processed to
determine the glucose and xylose content.
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
14/30
TreatedSample One
TreatedSample Two
UntreatedSample One
UntreatedSample Two
Glucose
Percentage 48.4 49.2 33.1 33.8
XylosePercentage
17.3 19.1 16.3 13.5
AveragePercentage
Glucose48.8 33.5
Average
PercentageXylose
18.2 14.9
Introduction of Bacteria to Facilitate Ethanol Production
The media for cultivating the bacteria was created using the lists of chemicals in
Appendices A1 through A6. Utilizing a scale precise to 1/10000th of a gram, nine, .002
gram specimens of pretreated biomass were isolated and placed in nine, ten mL, sterile
serum bottles. Six more bottles had the same amount of untreated biomass inserted
into them. Next, five milliliters of the media was introduced into each bottle, and they
were separated into three batches of five each, three with treated and two with
Figure 8: Glucose and Xylose Percentages
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
15/30
The bottles were removed from the heat source and cooled to 22 degrees
Celsius using a nitrogen/carbon dioxide gas. Using the crimping tool, the crimp seals
were seated onto each bottle. This had to be done promptly to avoid oxygen reentering
the media. The samples were placed in the autoclave for 20 minutes at 20 pounds per
square inch and 121 degrees Celsius to remove any unwanted organisms, and the
samples were cooled to 22 degrees Celsius. To create the ideal environment for
culturing the bacteria, a hypodermic syringe was utilized to introduce the trace element
Figure 9: Boiling to Remove Oxygen
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
16/30
Using a hypodermic syringe, the following bacteria was added to the fifteen
samples: .5 ml of Clostridium thermocellum was added to five samples, .5 ml of
Clostridium thermolactium was added to another five samples, and .25 ml of Clostridium
thermolactium and .25 ml of thermocellum (co-culture) was added to final five samples.
These strains of bacteria were used because they can live at higher temperatures than
most bacteria.
Figure 10: Adding Solutions to Autoclaved Media
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
17/30
locations that identified them by material and as a, b, or c samples; and processed
to determine the ethanol content.
Using Bacterial Cellulose Hydrolysis to Create Ethanol
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
18/30
ResultsAfter performing bacterial cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation on the
Clostridium thermocellum strain, the Clostridium thermolactium strain, and the co-
culture, which consisted of equal parts of the two strains; and, after examining the High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) test results, it was concluded that the
most viable bacteria choice for large-scale ethanol production was the co-culture. This
was based on high ethanol content. See Figures 12, A7, and A8.
The five samples of the Clostridium thermolactium strain performed poorly
compared to the Clostridium thermocellum, producing significantly less ethanol than
either the Clostridium thermocellum or the co-culture.
Clostridium Thermocellum efficiently degrades hexoses, monosaccharides with
six carbon atoms, while Clostridium thermolactium proficiently degrades pentoses,
monosaccharides with five carbon atoms. Therefore, the co-culture performed better
than either of the single strain cultures, since it was able to convert most of the simple
sugars.
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
19/30
Comparison of Enzymatic Hydrolysis (2012) and Bacterial Hydrolysis (2013)
Enzymatic Hydrolysis Bacterial Cellulose Hydrolysis
Biomass
(2011-2112)NaOH PretreatmentAverage Ethanol %
(a and b)v/v
(2011-2012)H2SO4 PretreatmentAverage Ethanol %
(a and b)v/v
(2012-2013)Clostridium
ThermocellumAverage Ethanol %
(a,b,c)v/v
(2012-2013)Clostridium
ThermolactiumAverage Ethanol %
(a,b,c)v/v
(2012-2013)Co-culture
Average Ethanol %(a,b,c)
v/v
CornStover 5.135 8.994 7.18 5.08 14.55
DiscussionThe focus of this study was investigating the use of bacteria to break down
cellulose, retrieve sugars, and ferment them into ethanol. This streamlined, one-step
approach could be a viable method to convert cellulosic biomass into renewable fuel.
These studies are vital because finding the best process is imperative to a cost-effective
cellulosic ethanol program.
Figure 12: Average Ethanol Content 2012-2013
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
20/30
the sugars is still protein-rich and can be used as livestock feed, which provides another
revenue source to offset the cost of ethanol production.
Another important aspect of lowering costs is finding better enzymes. Studies
are being made on the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) to examine the
structures of biomass products and enzymes at the molecular level to fully understand
how enzymes release glucose, with a goal of finding and/or creating more efficient and
cheaper enzymes. This is an important key to cost-effective cellulosic ethanol
production, since the cost of enzymes is a significant factor in glucose recovery.
The U.S. Department of Energys National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL) has just forged an agreement with Johnson Matthey, chemical manufacturer, to
commit five years and seven million dollars in a collaboration to find a catalyst that will
lower the cost of producing cellulosic biofuels. Many such efforts are being undertaken
today because the rewards of success would be enormous.
Last year this study discussed corn stover extensively because it comprises 75%
of agricultural waste and is readily available. The drawbacks were primarily soil loss
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
21/30
released a sustainable retention map, which shows areas of the country that require
high retention and areas that are sustainable with low retention. See Figure 13.
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
22/30
AcknowledgmentsI thank Dr. Ulrike Tschirner, from the University of Minnesota, for her
generous and steadfast assistance with equipment and materials,
with bacteria, and with informed counsel.
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
23/30
ReferencesEnergy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2011, Crop Residues and AgriculturalWasteshttp://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/btu_crop_residues.pdf
Osborne, Stefan, 2007, Energy in 2020: Assessing the Economic Effects ofCommercialization of Cellulosic Ethanolhttp://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ia
n_002699.pdf
Milbrandt, Anelia, 2006, Geographic Perspective on the Current Biomass ResourceAvailability in the United States, NRELhttp://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39181.pdf
Davis, John, 2009, International Energy Agency (IEA)http://domesticfuel.com/2009/10/13/iea-global-biofuel-production-to-rise-big-by-2012/
Glossary of Biomass Termshttp://www.nrel.gov/biomass/glossary.html
Lane, Jim, 2010, EPA Confirms Tiny Cellulosic Biofuels Mandate for 2011http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011
Hayes, Dermot, 2012, New University Study: Ethanol Reduced Gas Prices by Morethan $1 in 2011http://www.ethanolrfa.org/
http://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ian_002699.pdfhttp://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ian_002699.pdfhttp://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ian_002699.pdfhttp://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39181.pdfhttp://domesticfuel.com/2009/10/13/iea-global-biofuel-production-to-rise-big-by-2012/http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/glossary.htmlhttp://www.nrel.gov/biomass/glossary.htmlhttp://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011http://www.ethanolrfa.org/http://www.ethanolrfa.org/http://www.ethanolrfa.org/http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/12/epa-confirms-tiny-cellulosic-biofuels-mandate-for-2011http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/glossary.htmlhttp://domesticfuel.com/2009/10/13/iea-global-biofuel-production-to-rise-big-by-2012/http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39181.pdfhttp://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ian_002699.pdfhttp://www.trade.gov/mas/ian/build/groups/public/@tg_ian/documents/webcontent/tg_ian_002699.pdf7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
24/30
Page A1 ofA7
Appendices
Basal Medium
Chemical Formula Required Grams (g)Sodium Chloride NaCl 10.000
Magnesium MgCl2.6H2O 0.500
Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate KH2PO4 0.200
Ammonium Chloride NH4Cl 0.300
Potassium Chloride KCl 0.300Calcium Chloride Hydrate 2X with
Water
CaCl22H2O
0.015Sodium Bicarbonate NaHCO3 2.520
Resazurin 0.050
Yeast extract 4.000
L-Cysteine 0.240
Figure A1: Basal Medium Formula
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
25/30
Page A2 ofA7
Added to Completed Basal MediumAfter Autoclaving
Solution Required Milliliters (mL)
Trace Element Solution 1.00
Selenium-Tungstate solution 1.00
Vitamin Solution 5.00
Sodium Sulfide Solution 10.00
Trace Element Solution
Chemical Formula Required Milligrams (mg)
Iron Sulfate Hydrated 7X with WaterFeSO4 7H2O
2085.00
Cobalt II Chloride Hydrated 6X withWater
CoCl2 6H2O190.00
Manganese Chloride Hydrated 4Xwith Water
MnCl2 4H2O100.00
Zinc Sulfate Hydrated 7X with WaterZnSO4 7H2O
111.00
Boric Acid H3BO3 6.00Sodium Molybdate Hydrated 2X with
WaterNa2MoO4 2H2O
36.00
Nickel Chloride Hydrated 6X withWater
NiCl2 6H2O24.00
Copper II Chloride Hydrated 2X withWater CuCl2 2H2O 2.00
Figure A2: Solutions Added To Basal Medium
Figure A3: Trace Element Formula
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
26/30
Page A3 ofA7
Selenium - Tungsten Solution
Solution Formula Required Milligrams (mg)
Sodium Selenite Hydrated
5X with WaterNa2SeO3 5H2O
6.00Sodium Tungstate
Hydrated 2X with WaterNa2Wo4 2H2O
8.00
Sodium Hydroxide NaOH 540.00
Vitamin Solution
Chemical Required Milligrams (mg)
Biotin 20.00
Folic Acid 20.00
Pyridoxine Hydrochloride 100.00
Riboflavin 50.00
Thiamine 50.00
Nicotinic Acid 50.00
Pantothenic Acid 50.00
Vitamin B12 1.00
p-Aminobenzoic Acid 50.00
Thioctic Acid 50.00
Figure A4: Selenium Tungsten Solution
Figure A5: Vitamin Formula
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
27/30
Page A4 ofA7
Sodium Sulfide Solution
Chemical Formula Required AmountSodium Sulfide Solution
Hydrated 9 timesNa2S 9H2O
48 (mg)
Deionized Water H2O 40 (mL)
Glucose and Xylose PercentagesTreated
Sample OneTreated
Sample TwoUntreated
Sample OneUntreated
Sample Two
GlucosePercentage 48.4 49.2 33.1 33.8
XylosePercentage
17.3 19.1 16.3 13.5
AveragePercentage
Glucose48.8 33.5
AveragePercentage
Xylose18.2 14.9
Figure A6: Sodium Sulfide Solution
Figure A7: Glucose and Xylose Percentages
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
28/30
Page A5 ofA7
HPLC Results Ethanol Content Ethanol Average
BacteriaEthanol, ml
ethanol per mlof solution
Ethanol,% v/v
AverageEthanol %
(a,b,c)v/v
ClostridiumThermocellum 1a 0.0720 7.20 7.18
1b 0.0545 5.45
1c 0.0890 8.90
Control 1d 0.0025 0.25Control 1e*
ClostridiumThermolactium 2a 0.0435 4.35 5.08
2b 0.0410 4.10
2c 0.0680 6.80
Control 2d 0.0012 0.12
Control 2e*
Co-culture 3a 0.1705 17.05 14.55
3b 0.1225 12.25
3c 0.1435 14.35
Control 3d 0.0210 2.10
Control 3e 0.0180 1.80* The label "*" control samples couldn't give integratable HPLC curves, probably they were toosmall, and were covered by noisy signals.
Figure A8: HPLC Results Ethanol Content
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
29/30
Page A6 ofA7
TreatedSample One
TreatedSample Two
UntreatedSample One
UntreatedSample Two
Klason LigninPercentage
17.94 17.62 25.18 24.59
AveragePercentage
Klason Lignin
17.78 24.89
BacteriaTreated Average Ethanol
%(a,b,c)v/v
Untreated Average
Ethanol % (Control )
(e and d)
ClostridiumThermocellum 7.18 0.13
ClostridiumThermolactium 5.08 0.06
Co-culture 14.55 1.95
Figure A9: Klason Lignin Content
Figure A10: Average Ethanol Content
7/30/2019 Research Paper-Google Science Fair
30/30
Page A7 ofA7
Comparison of Enzymatic Hydrolysis (2012) and Bacterial Hydrolysis (2013)
Enzymatic Hydrolysis Bacterial Cellulose Hydrolysis
Biomass
(2011-2112)NaOH PretreatmentAverage Ethanol %
(a and b)v/v
(2011-2012)H2SO4 PretreatmentAverage Ethanol %
(a and b)v/v
(2012-2013)Clostridium
ThermocellumAverage Ethanol %
(a,b,c)v/v
(2012-2013)Clostridium
ThermolactiumAverage Ethanol %
(a,b,c)v/v
(2012-2013)Co-culture
Average Ethanol %(a,b,c)
v/v
CornStover 5.135 8.994 7.18 5.08 14.55
Figure A11: Comparison of Ethanol Content 2012 and 2013