4/4/2012 1 The Impact of Bandwidth on MRI Image Quality Chen Lin, PhD DABR Indiana University School of Medicine & Indiana University Health Disclosure • Research funding provided by Siemens Healthcare. Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012 What’s Bandwidth ? Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012 Radio Signal Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012 Bandwidth of Radio Signal Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012 CF BW More Waves / Frequencies -> Higher Bandwidth Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012 BW Hz Amplitude Higher “Bandwidth” = More Lanes
7
Embed
Research funding provided by Siemens The Impact of ...mri/seminars/slides/The Imapct of Bandwidth on MRI...• Research funding provided by Siemens Healthcare. Chen Lin, ... –Larger
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
4/4/2012
1
The Impact of Bandwidth on MRI Image Quality
Chen Lin, PhD DABR
Indiana University School of Medicine & Indiana University Health
Disclosure
• Research funding provided by Siemens Healthcare.
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
What’s Bandwidth ?
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Radio Signal
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Bandwidth of Radio Signal
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
CF
BW
More Waves / Frequencies -> Higher Bandwidth
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
BW
Hz
Amplitude
Higher “Bandwidth” = More Lanes
4/4/2012
2
RF Transmit and Receive in MRI
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Transmit Bandwidth (tBW)
Receive Bandwidth (rBW)
Why care about BWs ?
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
tBW
Readout Duration
Excitation & Refocusing Duration
Slice Gradient
Slice Thickness
Spatial Resolution
ESP, TE , TR, etc
rBW Read-out Gradient
PNST & SAR
SNR, Contrast,
Artifacts, Scan time
Tx Frequency
Z
tBW
(
~ 2
KH
z)
Slice/Slab Selection Excitation
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Thick Slice
Thin Slice
Given the same RF pulse, i.e. fixed tBW, thinner slice -> steeper slice selection gradient
Slice selection gradient: Gz Df (z) = g z Gz
What’s appropriate tBW ?
Advantages of high tBW
– Less distortion artifacts
– Shorter excitation pulse -> Shorter TE and Echo Spacing (ESP)
× Disadvantages of high tBW
– Larger minimal slice thickness
– Higher RF Amplitude -> Higher RF power and SAR
– Peripheral Nerve Stimulation PNST
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Slice Profile Distortion
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Z
DB(z) = z Gz
B0
B0 inhomogeneity
Thinner slice -> steeper slice selection gradient -> less slice profile distortion due to B0 inhomogeneity
Air Artifact ?
4/4/2012
3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
rfsincnf = (pi/2)*msinc
nf(128,4)
Time Bandwidth Product
• Higher tBW RF pulse -> Shorter pulse length
– > Higher gradient amplitude
– > Higher RF amplitude
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
FT
Time Domain Frequency Domain
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
rfsincnf = (pi/2)*msinc
nf(128,4)
BW
Time
Choices of Different RF Pulses
• Low SAR:
– 90/180: 5888ms/7680ms
• Normal:
– 90/180: 4096ms/5120ms
• Fast:
– 90/180: 2048ms/2560ms
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
90 180
Min. TE and ESP
RF Pulse (Type)
Min. TE (ms) Min. ESP
(ms) Min. SL (mm)
Low SAR 19 18.6 0.4
Normal 16 16.1 0.6
Fast 14 14.4 1.2
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Normal Gradient Mode & rBW=130 Hz/px
Relative RF Amplitude
• Low SAR
– 90/180: 26V/42V
• Normal
– 90/180: 37V/64V
• Fast
– 90/180: 70V/105V
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
RF Power and Absorption
1. High BW RF pulse -> High RF power
2. Short TE and ESP -> High duty cycle
1 & 2 -> High SAR
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
1
2( ) ( )P t B t
0
( )
T
SAR P t dt
What’s appropriate tBW ?
Advantages of high tBW
– Larger gradient -> Less distortion artifacts
– Shorter RF pulse -> Shorter TE and Echo Spacing (ESP)
× Disadvantage of high tBW
– Larger min. slice thickness due to max. gradient limit.
– Higher B1 -> High SAR (RF power)
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
4/4/2012
4
Rx Frequency
X
Rx
Ban
d W
idth
(RB
W)
(+/
- 8
– 1
28
KH
z)
Frequency Encode Direction
Frequency Encoding
Df (x) = g x Gx
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Chemical Shift Artifact
x
Gx
Water Signal Fat Signal
220Hz @ 1.5T
Miss-registration of fat and water in the frequency encoding and slice selection direction
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
rBW specifications
• GE: kHz
• Philips: WFS in pixels
• Siemens: Hz/pix
(WFS shown as Tool Tip.)
• Hz/pix = rBW / # of pix in freq dir
• WFS = (Hz/pix)/220Hz @ 1.5T or (Hz/pix)/440Hz @ 3.0T
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
WFS = 0.4 pix
rBW
What’s appropriate rBW
• Disadvantage of higher rBW
– Lower SNR
– Lower max. in-plane resolution
• Advantages of higher rBW
– Shorter TE and ESP (Faster Scan)
– Less artifacts
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Chemical Shift Artifact
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
rBW = 125Hz/px rBW = 490Hz/px
rBW & SNR
• SNR ~ f(Sequence Type, FA, TR, TE, TI …) x B0 PD Dx Dy Dz ( Nphase NEX ) 1/2 / rBW ½
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
f f
Low rBW High rBW
Signal
Noise
4/4/2012
5
rBW and Spatial Resolution (Pixel Size)
• Higher resolution -> Higher readout gradient
• Higher rBW-> Higher readout gradient
Both resolution and rBW are competing for readout gradient
Given max. gradient available, reduce rBW to allow higher max. spatial resolution (smaller pixels in readout direction).
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
MRI @ 200nm !
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Min. TE and ESP
RF Pulse (Type)
Min. SL (mm)
Min. TE (ms) Min. ESP
(ms)
Low SAR 0.4 19 -> 18 18.6 -> 17.7
Normal 0.6 16 -> 13 16.1 -> 13.4
FasT 1.2 14 -> 8.7 14 -> 8.74
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Normal Gradient Mode & rBW = 130Hz/px -> 651 Hz/px
rBW and artifacts
• Chemical shift artifacts
• B0 inhomogeneity (susceptibility) artifacts
– Spatial distortion
– Signal lost
• T2 Blurring artifacts in FSE
• Ghosting artifacts in EPI
• Banding artifacts in bSSFP
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
TR/TE (ms) 500/66 500/14 500/9
2 kHz 16 kHz 32 kHz
Comparison of rBW
Courtesy of Dr. J. Zhou of UIC
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
Susceptibility Artifact
• Increase receiver bandwidth (rBW).
• Use SE instead of GRE sequences.
• Reduce TE
• Imaging at lower field strength.
Chen Lin, PhD 3/2012
4/4/2012
6
Reducing Susceptibility Artifact 3D SPACE and High Receiver Bandwidth