Top Banner
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2013, Article ID 346094, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/346094 Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in Banach Spaces A. Razani and N. Karamikabir Department of Mathematics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran Correspondence should be addressed to A. Razani; [email protected] Received 10 April 2013; Accepted 17 June 2013 Academic Editor: Chengming Huang Copyright © 2013 A. Razani and N. Karamikabir. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Some fixed point theorems for generalized set contraction maps and KKM type ones in Banach spaces are presented. Moreover, a new generalized set contraction is introduced. As an application, some coincidence theorems for KKM type set contractions are obtained. 1. Introduction Let be a Banach space and P () = { ⊂ : is a nonempty and has a property } . (1) us P bd (), P cl (), P cv (), P cp (), P co (), P cl,bd (), P cp,cv (), and P rcp () denote the classes of all bounded, closed, convex, compact, connected, closed-bounded, com- pact-convex, and relatively compact subsets of , respectively [1]. Let 1 and 2 be two Banach spaces. A multivalued mapping : 1 P ( 2 ) is said to be (i) upper semicontinuous if and only if for every closed subset of 2 , the set () = { ∈ 1 : () ∩ ̸ = 0} is a closed subset of 1 , (ii) closed if its graph Gr() = {(, ) ∈ 1 × 2 :∈ ()} is a closed subset of 1 × 2 , (iii) compact if ( 1 ) is a compact subset of 2 . e first fixed point theorem for multivalued mappings is due to Kakutani in Banach spaces, in 1941 [2]. He proved a generalization of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem to the mul- tivalued mappings. eorem 1 (see [2]). Let be a compact subset of a Banach space and let :→ P cv,cp () be an upper semicontin- uous multivalued operator. en has a fixed point. e above theorem has been extended in the literature by generalizing or modifying the domain space , domain set , and the nature of the multivalued operator . Here, compactness plays an essential role. e following definition of measure of noncompactness on a bounded subset of the Banach space is given by Dhage in 2010. Definition 2 (see [1]). A function : P bd () → R + is called a measure of noncompactness if it satisfies (i) 0 ̸ = −1 (0) ⊂ P rcp (), (ii) if then () ≤ (), (iii) ( ) = (), where denotes the closure of , (iv) (Conv()) = (), where Conv() denotes the con- vex hull of , (v) if { } is a decreasing sequence of sets in P cl,bd () satisfying lim →∞ ( )=0, then the limiting set =∩ =1 is nonempty. Definition 3 (see [1]). A multivalued mapping : P cl,bd () is called D-set Lipschitz if there exists a continuous nondecreasing function : R + R + such that (()) ≤ (()) for all P cl,bd () with () ∈ P cl,bd (), where (0) = 0. Sometimes we call the function to be a D-func- tion of on . In the spatial case, when () = , >0, is called a -set Lipschitz mapping and if <1, then is called a -set contraction on . Further, if () < for >0, then is called a nonlinear D-set contraction on .
5

Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

Feb 08, 2018

Download

Documents

trinhxuyen
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

Hindawi Publishing CorporationAbstract and Applied AnalysisVolume 2013, Article ID 346094, 4 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/346094

Research ArticleSet Contractions and KKM Mappings in Banach Spaces

A. Razani and N. Karamikabir

Department of Mathematics, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Razani; [email protected]

Received 10 April 2013; Accepted 17 June 2013

Academic Editor: Chengming Huang

Copyright © 2013 A. Razani and N. Karamikabir. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work isproperly cited.

Some fixed point theorems for generalized set contraction maps and KKM type ones in Banach spaces are presented. Moreover, anew generalized set contraction is introduced. As an application, some coincidence theorems for KKM type set contractions areobtained.

1. Introduction

Let 𝐸 be a Banach space and

P𝑝 (𝐸)

= {𝐴 ⊂ 𝐸 : 𝐴 is a nonempty and has a property 𝑝} .(1)

Thus Pbd(𝐸), Pcl(𝐸), Pcv(𝐸), Pcp(𝐸), Pco(𝐸), Pcl,bd(𝐸),Pcp,cv(𝐸), and Prcp(𝐸) denote the classes of all bounded,closed, convex, compact, connected, closed-bounded, com-pact-convex, and relatively compact subsets of 𝐸, respectively[1]. Let 𝐸1 and 𝐸2 be two Banach spaces. A multivaluedmapping 𝑇 : 𝐸1 → P𝑝(𝐸2) is said to be

(i) upper semicontinuous if and only if for every closedsubset 𝐵 of 𝐸2, the set 𝑇

−(𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐸1 : 𝑇(𝑥)∩𝐵 = 0}

is a closed subset of 𝐸1,(ii) closed if its graph Gr(𝑇) = {(𝑥, 𝑦) ∈ 𝐸1 × 𝐸2 : 𝑦 ∈

𝑇(𝑥)} is a closed subset of 𝐸1 × 𝐸2,(iii) compact if 𝑇(𝐸1) is a compact subset of 𝐸2.

The first fixed point theorem for multivalued mappings isdue to Kakutani in Banach spaces, in 1941 [2]. He proved ageneralization of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem to the mul-tivalued mappings.

Theorem 1 (see [2]). Let 𝐾 be a compact subset of a Banachspace 𝐸 and let 𝐹 : 𝐾 → Pcv,cp(𝐾) be an upper semicontin-uous multivalued operator. Then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

The above theorem has been extended in the literatureby generalizing or modifying the domain space 𝐸, domainset 𝐾, and the nature of the multivalued operator 𝐹. Here,compactness plays an essential role. The following definitionof measure of noncompactness on a bounded subset of theBanach space 𝐸 is given by Dhage in 2010.

Definition 2 (see [1]). A function 𝜇 : Pbd(𝐸) → R+ is calleda measure of noncompactness if it satisfies

(i) 0 = 𝜇−1(0) ⊂ Prcp(𝐸),

(ii) if 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 then 𝜇(𝐴) ≤ 𝜇(𝐵),

(iii) 𝜇(𝐴) = 𝜇(𝐴), where 𝐴 denotes the closure of 𝐴,(iv) 𝜇(Conv(𝐴)) = 𝜇(𝐴), whereConv(𝐴) denotes the con-

vex hull of 𝐴,(v) if {𝐴𝑛} is a decreasing sequence of sets in Pcl,bd(𝐸)

satisfying lim𝑛→∞𝜇(𝐴𝑛) = 0, then the limiting set𝐴∞ = ∩

𝑛=1𝐴𝑛 is nonempty.

Definition 3 (see [1]). A multivalued mapping 𝑇 : 𝐸 →

Pcl,bd(𝐸) is calledD-set Lipschitz if there exists a continuousnondecreasing function 𝜓 : R+ → R+ such that 𝜇(𝑇(𝐴)) ≤𝜓(𝜇(𝐴)) for all 𝐴 ∈ Pcl,bd(𝐸) with 𝑇(𝐴) ∈ Pcl,bd(𝐸), where𝜓(0) = 0. Sometimes we call the function 𝜓 to be aD-func-tion of 𝑇 on 𝐸. In the spatial case, when 𝜓(𝑟) = 𝑘𝑟, 𝑘 > 0, 𝑇 iscalled a 𝑘-set Lipschitz mapping and if 𝑘 < 1, then 𝑇 is calleda 𝑘-set contraction on 𝐸. Further, if 𝜓(𝑟) < 𝑟 for 𝑟 > 0, then𝑇 is called a nonlinearD-set contraction on 𝐸.

Page 2: Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

2 Abstract and Applied Analysis

Dhage proved a generalization of Theorem 1 underweaker upper semicontinuity conditions in 2010 [1].

Theorem 4. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, convex, andbounded subset of a Banach space𝐸 and let𝑇 : 𝑋 → Pcl,cv(𝑋)be a closed and nonlinearD-set contraction.Then𝑇 has a fixedpoint.

Lemma 5 (see [3]). If 𝜓 is a D-function with 𝜓(𝑟) < 𝑟 for𝑟 > 0, then lim𝑛→∞𝜓

𝑛(𝑡) = 0 for all 𝑡 ∈ [0,∞).

Recall that a function 𝜑 : R+ → R+ is called a compari-son function if 𝜑 is increasing and lim𝑛→∞𝜑

𝑛(𝑡) = 0 for all

𝑡 ∈ R+ [4]. As a consequence, 𝜑(𝑡) < 𝑡 for any 𝑡 > 0, 𝜑 iscontinuous at 0, and 𝜑(0) = 0.

A function 𝜑 : R+ → R+ is called a (c)-comparisonfunction if 𝜑 is increasing and there exist 𝑘0 ∈ N, 𝑎 ∈ (0, 1)

and a convergent series of non-negative terms ∑∞𝑘=1

]𝑘 suchthat

𝜑𝑘+1

(𝑡) ≤ 𝑎𝜑𝑘(𝑡) + ]𝑘, (2)

for 𝑘 ≥ 𝑘0 and any 𝑡 ∈ [0,∞) [5]. If 𝜑 : R+ → R+ is a (c)-comparison function, then𝜑 is a comparison function [5]. So,we can defineC-set contraction as follows.

Definition 6. A multivalued mapping 𝑇 : 𝐸 → Pcl,bd(𝐸)is called C-set contraction if there exists a continuous (c)-comparison function 𝜑 such that 𝜇(𝑇(𝐴)) ≤ 𝜑(𝜇(𝐴)) for all𝐴 ∈ Pcl,bd(𝐸) with 𝑇(𝐴) ∈ Pcl,bd(𝐸).

Let (𝑋, 𝑑) be a metric space. The Hausdorff metric 𝐻𝑑induced by the metric 𝑑 and defined as follows

𝐻𝑑 (𝐴, 𝐵) = max{sup𝑎∈𝐴

𝑑 (𝑎, 𝐵) , sup𝑏∈𝐵

𝑑 (𝑏, 𝐴)} . (3)

Definition 7 (see [6]). Let 𝜀 > 0. A multivalued contractive(𝜀-contractive) map is a map 𝐹 : 𝑋⊸Pcl,bd(𝑋) such that forall 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋with 𝑥 = 𝑦 (and for some 𝜀 > 0, 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦) < 𝜀, resp.),𝐻𝑑(𝐹(𝑥), 𝐹(𝑦)) < 𝑑(𝑥, 𝑦).

Theorem 8 (see [7]). Let 𝑋 be a nonempty compact andconnected metric space and let 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcp(𝑋) be a mul-tivalued 𝜀-contractive map, then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

We need the following definitions of KKM theory in thesequel [8].

Assume that 𝑋 is a convex subset of a topological vectorspace and 𝑌 is a topological space. If 𝐺 : 𝑋 → P𝑝(𝑌) and𝐹 : 𝑋 → P𝑝(𝑌) are two multivalued maps and for each𝐴 ∈ ⟨𝑋⟩, 𝐹(Conv(𝐴)) ⊂ 𝐺(𝐴), then 𝐺 is called generalizedKKM mapping with respect to 𝐹, where ⟨𝑋⟩ denote thefamily of all nonempty finite subsets of 𝑋. More generally,if 𝐹 : 𝑋 → P𝑝(𝑌) satisfies the requirement that for anygeneralized KKM mapping 𝐺 : 𝑋 → P𝑝(𝑌) with respect to

𝐹 and the family {𝐺(𝑥) : 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋} has the finite intersectionproperty, then 𝐹 is said to have the KKM property. Let

KKM (𝑋, 𝑌)

= {𝐹 : 𝑋 → P𝑝 (𝑌) : 𝐹 has the KKM property} .(4)

Lemma 9 (see [8]). Let 𝑋 be a nonempty convex subset ofHausdorff topological vector space 𝐸. Then 𝑇|𝐷 ∈ KKM(𝐷, 𝑌)

whenever 𝑇 ∈ KKM(𝑋, 𝑌) and𝐷 is a nonempty convex subsetof𝑋.

Chen and Chang obtained some fixed point theorems forKKM type set contraction mappings in various spaces [9–12]. In 2010, Amini-Harandi et al. introduced generalized setcontraction on topological spaces [13].

In Section 2, we present some fixed point theorems forgeneralized set contractions which are 𝜀-contractive (KKM 𝜀-contractive) multivalued maps. In the first step of Section 3,we introduce a new type of generalized set contraction andthen prove that the results of Section 2 hold for them.Section 4 is devoted to some KKM coincidence theorems asapplications of these results.

2. Generalized Set Contractions

In this section by applying Theorem 8, we obtain some fixedpoint theorems for 𝜀-contractive multivalued maps whichare either generalized set contraction or KKM type ones. Inall cases, the multivalued maps are not necessarily compactvalues. We consider measurement of noncompactness inDefinition 2.

Definition 10 (see [13]). A multivalued mapping 𝐹 : 𝐸 →

P𝑝(𝐸) is said to be a generalized set contraction, if for each𝜖 > 0 there exists 𝛿 > 0 such that for 𝐴 ∈ Pcl,bd(𝐸) with𝜖 ≤ 𝜇(𝐴) < 𝜖 + 𝛿, there exists 𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 such that 𝜇(𝐹𝑛(𝐴)) < 𝜖.

Lemma 11 (see [13]). Let 𝑋 be a topological space and let𝜇 be a measure of noncompactness on 𝑋. Suppose that 𝐹is a generalized set contraction on 𝑋. Then for every subset𝐴 of 𝑋 for which 𝐹(𝐴) ⊂ 𝐴 and 𝜇(𝐴) < ∞, one haslim𝑛→∞𝜇(𝐹

𝑛(𝐴)) = 0.

Proposition 12. Let 𝐸 be a Hausdorff topological space. If{𝑋𝑛} is a decreasing sequence of closed and connected setsin Pcl,bd(𝐸) such that lim𝑛→∞𝜇(𝑋𝑛) = 0, then ∩

𝑛=1𝑋𝑛 is

nonempty, compact, and connected.

Proof. Clearly, 𝐾 = ∩∞

𝑛=1𝑋𝑛 is a nonempty, closed, and

compact subset of 𝐸. Let 𝐴 and 𝐵 be two nonempty, disjoint,and closed sets so that 𝐾 = 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵. We can find disjointopen sets 𝑈 and 𝑉 around 𝐴 and 𝐵, respectively. For every𝑛 ∈ N, 𝑋𝑛 \ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉) is nonempty. If not, then (𝑈 ∩ 𝑋𝑛) and(𝑉 ∩ 𝑋𝑛) are nonempty and 𝑋𝑛 = (𝑈 ∩ 𝑋𝑛) ∪ (𝑉 ∩ 𝑋𝑛),which cannot happen. The collection of {𝑋𝑛 \ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)} isalso a decreasing sequence of nonempty closed sets. Since𝜇(𝑋𝑛 \ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) ≤ 𝜇(𝑋𝑛) then 𝜇(𝑋𝑛 \ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) → 0 as𝑛 → ∞. Hence, ∩∞

𝑛=0(𝑋𝑛 \ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)) is nonempty, that is,

𝐾 ∩ (𝑈 ∪ 𝑉)𝑐= 0, which is a contradiction.

Page 3: Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

Abstract and Applied Analysis 3

Theorem 13. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, bounded, closed, andconnected subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,co(𝑋)is an 𝜀-contractive and generalized set contraction, then 𝐹 hasa fixed point and the set of fixed points of 𝐹 is compact.

Proof. Let𝑋0 = 𝑋 and𝑋𝑛 = 𝐹𝑛(𝑋) for all 𝑛 ∈ N. Since𝐹 is an𝜀-contractivemap, then𝐹 is continuous and𝐹(𝐴) ⊆ 𝐹(𝐴). Onthe other hand,𝐹𝑛+1(𝑋) ⊆ 𝐹

𝑛(𝑋), sowe have𝐹(𝑋𝑛) ⊆ 𝑋𝑛 and

𝑋𝑛+1 ⊆ 𝑋𝑛. Since 𝐹 is continuous with closed and connectedvalues, then by [14, Lemma 1.6], 𝐹(𝑋) is connected. Hence,𝑋𝑛 which is closure of connected set 𝐹𝑛(𝑋) for all 𝑛 ∈ N, isconnected. But 𝜇(𝑋𝑛) = 𝜇(𝐹

𝑛(𝑋)), and by Lemma 11 we have

𝜇(𝑋𝑛) → 0. Therefore, by Proposition 12, 𝐾 = ∩∞

𝑛=1𝑋𝑛 is

nonempty compact and connected. Since 𝐹(𝐾) ⊆ 𝐾, then thedesired conclusion followed by an application of Theorem 8to the multivalued map 𝐹 : 𝐾 → Pcp(𝐾).

Let 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 : 𝑥 ∈ 𝐹(𝑥)}. We claim that 𝜖0 = 𝜇(𝐵) = 0.If 𝜇(𝐵) = 0 then 𝜇(𝐵) = 𝜇(𝐹

𝑛(𝐵)). Since 𝐹 is a generalized

set contraction, then for 𝜖0 > 0, there exists 𝛿 > 0 such thatfor 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑋 with 𝜖0 ≤ 𝜇(𝐵) < 𝜖0 + 𝛿, there exists 𝑛 ∈ N

such that 𝜖0 = 𝜇(𝐵) < 𝜖0, which is a contradiction. So 𝐵

is relatively compact, and since 𝐹 is continuous, then 𝐵 is acompact subset of𝑋.

If 𝐹 : 𝐸 → P𝑝(𝐸) is a 𝑘-set contraction, then 𝐹 is a gen-eralized set contraction, but the converse is not true [13].Therefore, we have the following result.

Corollary 14. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, bounded, closed, andconnected subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,co(𝑋)is an 𝜀-contractive and 𝑘-set contraction, then 𝐹 has a fixedpoint.

Corollary 15. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,bd(𝑋) is an 𝜀-contractive and generalized set contraction, then there exists acompact subset 𝐾 of𝑋 such that 𝐹(𝐾) ⊆ 𝐾.

Theorem 16. Let𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and bounded subsetof Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋) is an 𝜀-contractive andgeneralized set contraction with nonempty closed and boundedvalues, then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

Proof. By Corollary 15, there exists a compact subset 𝐾 of𝑋 such that 𝐹(𝐾) ⊆ 𝐾. Let 𝑌 = 𝐹(𝐾). Hence there existsa finite subset 𝐴 of 𝐾 such that 𝑌 ⊆ ∪𝑥∈𝐴𝑁(𝑥, 𝜀), where𝑁(𝑥, 𝜀) = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐸 : ‖𝑥 − 𝑦‖ < 𝜀}. Define a map 𝑇 : 𝐾 →

P𝑝(𝑌) by 𝑇(𝑥) = 𝑌 \ 𝑁(𝑥, 𝜖) for all 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾; then 𝑇(𝑥)

is closed for each 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 and ∩𝑥∈𝐴𝑇(𝑥) = 0. Since 𝑌 ⊆

𝐾 ⊆ 𝑋 and 𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋), then by Lemma 9, 𝐹|𝐾 ∈

KKM(𝐾, 𝑌). Thus, 𝑇 is not a generalized KKM map withrespect to 𝐹|𝐾. Hence, there exists {𝑥0, 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛} of 𝐾 suchthat 𝐹(Conv({𝑥0, 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛})) ⊆ ∪

𝑛

𝑖=0𝑇(𝑥𝑖). Thus there exists

𝑦 ∈ 𝐹(Conv({𝑥0, 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛})) such that 𝑦 ∉ ∪𝑛

𝑖=0𝑇(𝑥𝑖),

that is, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹(𝑧) for some 𝑧 ∈ Conv({𝑥0, 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛}) and𝑦 ∈ 𝑁(𝑥𝑖, 𝜖), so 𝑥𝑖 ∈ 𝑁(𝑦, 𝜖) for 𝑖 ∈ {0, 1, . . . , 𝑛}. Since𝑧 ∈ Conv({𝑥0, 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛}) ⊂ 𝐵(𝑦, 𝜖), then 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹(𝑧) ∩ 𝐵(𝑧, 𝜖).Since 𝑌 is a compact subset of 𝑋, then 𝑦 converges to some𝑥 ∈ 𝑌 as 𝜖 → 0. Consequently, 𝑧 converges to 𝑥 as 𝜖 → 0.

Since 𝐹 is continuous, then by [14, Lemma 1.6] we have 𝑥 ∈

𝐹(𝑥).

3. Asymptotic Generalized Set Contractions

In this section, we define a new type of set contraction inBanach spaces. Then we prove that the results of Section 2hold for them. Also, we conclude some fixed point theoremsfor nonlinearD-set contractions.

Definition 17. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of a Banach space 𝐸. A multivalued mapping 𝐹 : 𝑋 →

P𝑝(𝑋) is said to be an asymptotic generalized set contraction,if there exists a sequence {𝜑𝑛} of functions fromR+ in to itselfsatisfies

(i) for each 𝜀 > 0, there exists 𝛿 > 0 and𝑚 ∈ N such that𝜑𝑚(𝑡) ≤ 𝜀 for all 𝜀 ≤ 𝑡 < 𝜀 + 𝛿,

(ii) 𝜇(𝐹𝑛(𝑋)) < 𝜑𝑛(𝜇(𝑋)).

Theorem 18. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, bounded, closed, andconnected subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,co(𝑋)is an 𝜀-contractive and asymptotic generalized set contraction,then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

Proof. Define a sequence {𝑋𝑛} of sets in Pcl,bd(𝑋) such that𝑋0 = 𝑋 and 𝑋𝑛 = 𝐹𝑛(𝑋) for all 𝑛 ∈ N. As the proof ofTheorem 13,𝐹(𝑋𝑛) ⊆ 𝑋𝑛,𝑋𝑛+1 ⊂ 𝑋𝑛, and𝑋𝑛 is connected forall 𝑛 ∈ N. If there exists an integer𝑁 > 0 such that𝜇(𝑋𝑁) = 0,then𝑋𝑁 is a compact and connected set and invariant under𝐹. Thus Theorem 8 implies that 𝐹 : 𝑋𝑁 → Pcp(𝑋𝑁) has afixed point. So we assume that 𝜇(𝑋𝑛) = 0 for all 𝑛 ∈ N. Define𝜀𝑛 = 𝜇(𝑋𝑛) and 𝑟 = inf 𝜀𝑛. If 𝑟 = 0, by Definition 17, thereexists 𝑛0 ∈ N, 𝛿𝑟 > 0 and 𝑚 ∈ N such that 𝜑𝑚(𝑡) ≤ 𝑟 for all𝑟 ≤ 𝑡 < 𝑟 + 𝛿𝑟 and 𝑟 ≤ 𝜀𝑛0

< 𝑟 + 𝛿𝑟, so

𝜀𝑛0+𝑚= 𝜇 (𝑋𝑛0+𝑚

) = 𝜇 (𝐹𝑛0+𝑚

(𝑋))

< 𝜑𝑚 (𝜇 (𝐹𝑛0(𝑋))) = 𝜑𝑚 (𝜇 (𝑋𝑛0

)) ≤ 𝑟,

(5)

which is a contradiction. Hence 𝜇(𝑋𝑛) ⇀ 0 as 𝑛 → ∞.Now by Proposition 12, 𝐾 = ∩

𝑛=1𝑋𝑛 is nonempty, compact,

and connected. Moreover 𝐹(𝐾) ⊆ 𝐾. So by Theorem 8, themultivalued map 𝐹 : 𝐾 → Pcp(𝐾) has a fixed point.

Corollary 19. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,bd(𝑋) is an 𝜀-contractive and asymptotic generalized set contraction, thenthere exists a compact subset 𝐾 of𝑋 such that 𝐹(𝐾) ⊆ 𝐾.

The proof of following theorem is similar to that ofTheorem 16; hence it is omitted.

Theorem 20. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of Banach space𝐸. If𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋) is an 𝜀-contractiveand asymptotic generalized set contraction with nonemptyclosed and bounded values, then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

Proposition 21. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,bd(𝑋) is a nonlinear

Page 4: Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

4 Abstract and Applied Analysis

D-set contraction, then 𝐹 is an asymptotic generalized setcontraction.

Proof. Let 𝐹 be a nonlinear D-set contraction with D-function 𝜓. Define 𝜑𝑛 = 𝜓

𝑛 for all 𝑛 ∈ N. Clearly, 𝜇(𝐹𝑛(𝑋)) ≤𝜓𝑛(𝜇(𝑋)) = 𝜑𝑛(𝜇(𝑋)), on the other hand, by Lemma 5 we

have 𝜑𝑛(𝑡) → 0 as 𝑛 → ∞. Thus 𝐹 is an asymptotic gen-eralized set contraction.

Applying Proposition 21,Theorems 18 and 20, it is easy toconclude the following results.

Corollary 22. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, bounded, closed, andconnected subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,co(𝑋) isan 𝜀-contractive and nonlinearD-set contraction, then 𝐹 has afixed point.

Corollary 23. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, and boundedsubset of Banach space𝐸. If𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋) is an 𝜀-contractiveand nonlinear D-set contraction with nonempty closed andbounded values, then 𝐹 has a fixed point.

Remark 24. Since every C-set contraction is a nonlinearD-set contraction, then Theorem 4, Corollaries 22 and 23 holdfor these mappings.

4. Some Applications in KKM Theory

In this section we obtain two coincidence theorems for KKMtype set contractions.

Theorem 25. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, bounded, andconvex subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,bd(𝑋) and𝐺 : 𝑋 → Pcv(𝑋) are two multivalued mappings satisfying

(i) 𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋),

(ii) 𝐹 is a generalized (an asymptotic) set contraction and𝜀-contractive map,

(iii) for each compact subset𝐶 of𝑋 and any 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋,𝐺−(𝑦)∩𝐶 is open in 𝐶,

then, there exists 𝑥0, 𝑦0 ∈ 𝑋 such that 𝑦0 ∈ 𝐹(𝑥0) and 𝑥0 ∈𝐺(𝑦0).

Proof. By Corollary 15 (Corollary 19), there exists a compactsubset 𝐾 of 𝑋 such that 𝐹(𝐾) ⊂ 𝐾. Since 𝐺(𝑥) = 0 and 𝐾 iscompact, then 𝑋 = ∪𝑥∈𝑋𝐺

−(𝑋) and 𝐾 = ∪

𝑛

𝑖=1(𝐺−(𝑥𝑖) ∩ 𝐾)

for some 𝑥1, . . . , 𝑥𝑛 ∈ 𝑋. Define a map 𝑆 : 𝑋 → P𝑝(𝐾) by𝑆(𝑥) = 𝐾 \ (𝐺

−(𝑥) ∩ 𝐾) for each 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, then ∩𝑛

𝑖=1𝑆(𝑥𝑖) = 0.

Therefore, 𝑆 is not a generalized KKMmap with respect to 𝐹.So there exists a finite subset 𝐴 = {𝑎1, . . . 𝑎𝑚} of 𝑋 such that𝐹(Conv(𝐴)) ⊆ 𝑆(𝐴). Hence, there exist 𝑥0 ∈ Conv(𝐴) and𝑦0 ∈ 𝐹(𝑥0) such that 𝑦0 ∉ 𝑆(𝐴). Thus 𝑦0 ∈ 𝐺

−(𝑎𝑖) ∩ 𝐾 and

so 𝑎𝑖 ∈ 𝐺(𝑦0) for 𝑖 = 1, . . . , 𝑚. Since 𝐺(𝑦0) is convex, thenConv(𝐴) ⊆ 𝐺(𝑦0) and so 𝑥0 ∈ 𝐺(𝑦0).

By Proposition 21, Corollary 19, and slight modificationof the proof of Theorem 25, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 26. Let 𝑋 be a nonempty, closed, bounded, andconvex subset of Banach space 𝐸. If 𝐹 : 𝑋 → Pcl,cv(𝑋) and𝐺 : 𝑋 → Pcv(𝑋) are two multivalued mappings satisfying

(i) 𝐹 ∈ KKM(𝑋,𝑋) is a nonlinearD-set contraction.(ii) for each compact subset𝐶 of𝑋 and any 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋,𝐺−(𝑦)∩

𝐶 is open in 𝐶,

then, there exists 𝑥0, 𝑦0 ∈ 𝑋 such that 𝑦0 ∈ 𝐹(𝑥0) and 𝑥0 ∈𝐺(𝑦0).

References

[1] B. C. Dhage, “Some generalizations of mulit-valued version ofSchauder’s fixed point theoremwith applications,”Cubo, vol. 12,no. 3, pp. 139–151, 2010.

[2] S. A. Kakutani, “A generalization of Brouwer’s fixed pointtheorem,” Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 8, pp. 457–459, 1941.

[3] B. C. Dhage, “Asymptotic stability of nonlinear functionalintegral equations via measures of noncompactness,” Commu-nications onAppliedNonlinearAnalysis, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 89–101,2008.

[4] I. A. Rus, Generalized Contractions and Applications, ClujUniversity Press, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2001.

[5] V. Berinde, Contractii generalizate si aplicittii, vol. 22, EdituraCub Press, Baia Mare, Romania, 1997.

[6] M. Edelstein, “On fixed and periodic points under contractivemappings,” Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 37,pp. 74–79, 1962.

[7] S. B. Nadler Jr., “Periodic points of multi-valued 𝜖-contractivemaps,” Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 22, no. 2,pp. 399–409, 2003.

[8] T.-H. Chang and C.-L. Yen, “KKM property and fixed pointtheorems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 224–235, 1996.

[9] T. H. Chang and C. M. Chen, “Fixed point theorems for thegeneralized Ψ-set contraction mapping on an abstract convexspace,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp.2015–2025, 2010.

[10] C.-M. Chen and T.-H. Chang, “Some results for the family𝐾𝐾𝑀(𝑋, 𝑌) and the Φ-mapping,” Journal of MathematicalAnalysis and Applications, vol. 329, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2007.

[11] C.-M. Chen and T.-H. Chang, “Fixed point theorems for aweaker Meir-Keeler type 𝜓-set contraction in metric spaces,”Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2009, Article ID129124, pp. 1–8, 2009.

[12] C.-M. Chen, “Fixed point theorems for cyclic Meir-Keeler typemappings in complete metric spaces,” Fixed Point Theory andApplications, vol. 2012, article 41, pp. 1–13, 2012.

[13] A. Amini-Harandi, M. Fakhar, and J. Zafarani, “Fixed pointtheorems for generalized set-contraction maps and their appli-cations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications ,vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2891–2895, 2010.

[14] R. E. Smithson, “Some general properties of multi-valuedfunctions,” Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 681–703, 1965.

Page 5: Research Article Set Contractions and KKM Mappings in …downloads.hindawi.com/journals/aaa/2013/346094.pdf · Hindawi Publishing Corporation Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Differential EquationsInternational Journal of

Volume 2014

Applied MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in

Complex AnalysisJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

OptimizationJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Operations ResearchAdvances in

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Function Spaces

Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Algebra

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Decision SciencesAdvances in

Discrete MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of