REPUBLIC OF KENYA THE PRESIDENCY MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING · 2015. 7. 6. · the sector targets in SPS 2015 have been aligned to the aspirations of the Constitution, Kenya

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

THE PRESIDENCY

MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING

SECTOR PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 2015

2nd Edition

MARCH 2015

i

ii

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

THE PRESIDENCY

MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING

SECTOR PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 2015

2nd Edition

MARCH 2015

iii

FOREWORD

The Sector Performance Standards 2015 review marks an important milestone in the

Government’s implementation of the performance contracting process that was

adopted in 2003 and which is a key input in the successful implementation of Kenya

Vision 2030 and Medium Term Plans. The first Sector Performance Standards

developed in 2009 covered the Kenya Vision 2030, First Medium Term Plan 2008-

2012. The emerging developments and dynamics since then, that included the

promulgation of the Constitution 2010 and the Second Medium Term Plan 2013-2017

has necessitated the review of the Standards.

The Sector Performance Standards enables different sectors to define performance

levels; improve performance contracting and evaluation; strengthen the linkages

between development planning, budgeting and M&E. This will ultimately improve

public service delivery in the country and lead to the achievement of Vision 2030

targets.

The Sector Performance Standards (SPS) highlight outcome oriented indicators for

monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of programmes and projects in all

sectors. The key result areas, performance indicators and the targets in each sector

have been carefully identified and address the priorities of the Government. The

performance indicator targets have been benchmarked against those in the middle

and high income economies.

These Standards cover the Second MTP 2013-2017 plan period and will guide the

performance contracting process across the public service. All public sector institutions

are required to apply these standards when setting their performance indicators and

targets.

The achievement of the targets contained in this SPS calls for a collaborative approach in implementing programmes and projects and commitment to ensure realization of Kenya Vision 2030 that will make our country a globally competitive and prosperous

nation.

I therefore call upon Government institutions, development partners, private sector and all development stakeholders to work towards achieving these Standards. My office is committed to maximizing the welfare of Kenyans through efficient and effective performance contracting and public service delivery. Anne Waiguru, OGW

Cabinet Secretary

Ministry of Devolution and Planning

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Ministry of Devolution and Planning, which is mandated with the formulation of

national development plans, as well as undertaking monitoring and evaluation,

reviewed the Sector Performance Standards 2009/10. The review was undertaken in

order to align the performance indicators to the Second MTP and Vision 2030.

This SPS is a product of benchmarking and is therefore a tool that will guide

implementation of the government’s priorities/programmes towards achieving the

country’s global competitiveness. The key result areas, performance indicators and

the sector targets in SPS 2015 have been aligned to the aspirations of the Constitution,

Kenya Vision 2030, Second MTP and other government policies. The SPS is a key

document for reference in setting standards for the performance contracting targets

by all MDAs and will inform policy.

The SPS has been developed through a consultative process where MDAs provided

targets that have been included. Several sector discussions and validation meetings

were held to ensure that consensus is built with regards to identification of key result

areas and performance standards. This document contains the sector vision and

mission, strategic objectives, key result areas and performance standards, as well as

the status as at 2012.

We are grateful to the Cabinet Secretary, Ms. Anne Waiguru, O.G.W, for authorizing

and providing overall leadership in the review of the Sector Performance Standards.

We wish to thank the team that worked tirelessly to review the Sector Performance

Standards. The team comprised the following experts: Mr. Jackson Kiprono of Ministry

of Devolution and Planning (Chairperson), Mr. Bernard N. Simiyu (Vice Chair and

Consultant), Prof. Tabitha Kiriti Ng'ang'a of School of Economics, University of Nairobi

(UoN); Dr. Jacob N. Onkunya, HSC (Consultant), Mr. Elisha Wandera (Consultant),

Eng. Harry Mathenge (Consultant), Mr. Francis Mwandembo of Kenya National Bureau

of Statistics, Ms. Ada Mwangola of Vision 2030 Delivery Secretariat, Ms. Margaret

Githinji of Ministry of Devolution and Planning, and Mr. Joshua Mwiranga of Ministry

of Devolution and Planning.

Similarly, we wish to acknowledge the contributions of Mr. Kirung’e Kinuthia

(Consultant), Mr. Adonijah A. Nyamwanda (Consultant), Ms. Anastacia Kariuki of

Public Service Commission of Kenya and Mr. Andrew Maiyo of Kenya Bureau of

Standards.

We would also like to thank the staff of Performance Contracting Division, particularly

Mr. Paul Mbuni, Coordinator of the Review exercise. Special thanks go to the

v

Secretariat comprising Ms. Marianne Kisanji, Mrs. Joyce Bonuke, Ms. Lydiah Mutenyo

and Mr. Rufus Muiruri.

In conclusion, the Ministry acknowledges all the MDAs for providing support in the

process of developing the 2015 Sector Performance Standards.

Eng. Peter Mangiti Principal Secretary, State Department of Planning Ministry of Devolution and Planning

vi

Table of Contents

FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................ iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... viii

CHAPTER ONE ......................................................................................................................................... 1

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE ........................................................................................................ 1

1.2.1 Establishment of the task force .................................................................................. 1

1.3 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 2

1.3.1 Sectors ............................................................................................................................ 2

1.3.2 Development of Draft Sector Standards ................................................................... 4

CHAPTER TWO ........................................................................................................................................ 6

AGRICULTURE, RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 6

2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6

2.2 Vision and Mission ................................................................................................................ 7

2.5Key Result Areas ......................................................................................................................... 8

CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 23

GENERAL ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS SECTOR ................................................................ 23

3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 23

3.2 Vision and Mission .............................................................................................................. 23

3.3 Strategic goals/objectives of the Sector .......................................................................... 24

3.4 Sub Sectors and their Mandates ....................................................................................... 25

3.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies ....................................................................... 26

3.6 Key Result Areas ................................................................................................................. 27

CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 39

ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INFORMATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY SECTOR .. 39

4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 39


4.3 Strategic Goals/Objectives of the Sector......................................................................... 40

4.4 Strategic objectives ............................................................................................................ 41

4.5 Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (AGAs and SAGAs) ...... 42

4.5.1 Energy and Petroleum Subsector ............................................................................. 42

vii

4.5.2 Transport and Infrastructure Subsector .................................................................. 42

4.5.3 Information Communications and Technology Subsector .................................... 43

4.6 Key Result Areas ................................................................................................................. 43

CHAPTER 5 ............................................................................................................................................ 52

SOCIAL PROTECTION, CULTURE AND RECREATION SECTOR ................................................................. 52

5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 52


5.3 Strategic Objectives ............................................................................................................ 52

5.4 Sub-Sector Mandates ......................................................................................................... 53

5.4.1 Labour, Social Security and Services ....................................................................... 53

5.4.2 Sports, Culture and the Arts sub-Sector ................................................................. 53

5.5.2 Sports, Culture and Arts Sub-Sector ........................................................................ 54

5.5.3 Programmes ................................................................................................................ 55

5.6 Key Result Areas ................................................................................................................. 55

CHAPTER 6 ............................................................................................................................................ 65

EDUCATION SECTOR ............................................................................................................................. 65

6.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 65


6.3 Strategic Goals and Objectives of the Sector ................................................................. 65

6.3.1 Strategic Objectives of Education Sector ................................................................ 66

6.4 Sub Sectors .......................................................................................................................... 67

6.5 Commission ......................................................................................................................... 67

6.6 Sagas in the Sector ............................................................................................................ 67

6.7 Key result areas .................................................................................................................. 68

CHAPTER 7 ............................................................................................................................................ 78

HEALTH SECTOR .................................................................................................................................... 78

7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 78


7.3 Strategic Objectives ............................................................................................................ 79

7.4 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs) ....................................................... 79

7.5 Key Result Areas ................................................................................................................. 79

CHAPTER 8 ............................................................................................................................................ 85

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SECTOR................................................. 85

8.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 85

viii


8.3 Strategic goals/Objectives of the Sector ......................................................................... 85

8.4 Sub-Sectors ........................................................................................................................ 86

8.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies ....................................................................... 86

8.6 Key Result Areas ................................................................................................................. 87

CHAPTER 9 .......................................................................................................................................... 102

GOVERNANCE, JUSTICE LAW AND ORDER SECTOR ............................................................................ 102

9.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 102

9.2 Vision and Mission ............................................................................................................ 102

9.3 Strategic Objectives of the Sector .................................................................................. 103

9.4 Sub-sectors ....................................................................................................................... 103

9.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs) ..................................................... 104

9.5.1 SAGAs ......................................................................................................................... 104

9.5.2 TRIBUNALS ................................................................................................................ 104

9.6 Key Results Areas ......................................................................................................... 105

CHAPTER 10 ........................................................................................................................................ 116

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES SECTOR ................................. 116

10.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 116

10.2 Vision and Mission ............................................................................................................ 116

10.3 Strategic goals/Objectives of the Sector ....................................................................... 116

10.4 Sub-Sectors and their Mandates .................................................................................... 117

10.4.1 Environment, Water and Natural Resources ........................................................ 117

10.4.2 Mining Sub-Sector ..................................................................................................... 117

10.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies ..................................................................... 118

10.6 Key Result Areas ............................................................................................................... 119

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................... 127

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The development of Sector Performance Standards was first undertaken in 2010 and

covered Medium Term Plan I which ended in 2012. There was therefore need to review

ix

these standards and align them to MTP II (2013/2017) and to Vision 2030. A Task

Force was appointed by the Office of the Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Devolution and

Planning, to assist in the review of Sector Performance Standards (SPS) developed in

2009. The team started its work on 5th May, 2014 with the goal of updating and bench

marking the Standards to International best Practice.

In the development of Sector Performance Standards the following activities were

undertaken: Review of the Sector Performance Standards 2010; Consultations with

different sectors and updating current status; Stakeholder workshop for validation.

The review identified new Key Results Areas (KRAs) and aligned the same to MPT II

and Kenya Vision 2030. For each Key Results Area (KRA), indicators have been

identified to enable assessment of progress. The targets were set for each indicator

against the status as at 2012 and in line with the global standards.

The Task Force observed that some global performance indicators can enable

comparison of Kenya with other countries in areas such as governance, productivity

and human welfare. However, there are other indicators in this report which had no

comparative international data. For such indicators the Task Force relied on expert

opinion to set the standards. In addition there are some indicators which are

crosscutting in nature and collaboration amongst MDAs is necessary in setting their

targets. Due to the dynamic nature of national and global economies, the status on

indicators needs to be determined and updated on a regular basis.

The KRA indicators and targets form a framework of an effective performance

management system that delivers high quality services and builds public confidence

and trust in the performance management system. The SPS forms the basis of

development of performance indicators for all sectors. These standards will also enable

Kenya to compare itself with other economies worldwide.

1

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND

In 2008, the Government of Kenya published Kenya Vision 2030 as its long term

development blueprint for achieving global competitiveness and prosperity. Through the

Vision, the Government aims to link public sector reforms and economic growth to high

quality of life of Kenyans. Among the key strategies for implementation of Kenya Vision

2030 is to link result based management and performance contracting towards the

implementation of its goals.

The development of Sector Performance Standards (SPS) in 2009, created a basis for

linking the implementation of public sector reforms to planning and budgeting. It also

provided a platform of drawing up of performance indicators benchmarked to

international best practices.

Key Results Areas (KRAs) are identified on the basis of sector and sub-sector mandates

aligned to Vision 2030. The KRAs are considered essential components for a globally

competitive nation. For each KRA, indicators were designed to enable measurement of

progress. The current status of the KRAs and Standards has been determined, and the

targets to be achieved for immediate, medium term and long term proposed.

1.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE

1.2.1 Establishment of the task force

The office of the Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Devolution and Planning, constituted a

Task Force to review Sector Performance Standards 2010, in May 2014. The Task Force

comprised of experts from the private sector and the public sector who had been

involved in the development of the Sector Performance Standards 2010. The task force

was mandated to do the following:

a) Establish the current sector Performance status in comparison with the previous

standards;

2

b) Align sector standards (indicators and targets) for each sector to Medium Term

Plan (MTP) II;

c) Define Key Result Areas/performance measures for each sector, benchmarked to

best international practices;

d) Define/ project performance levels to be achieved in each sector for the country

to achieve and possibly exceed the growth rates in Vision 2030;

e) Hold consultative forums with stakeholders for the purpose of obtaining

consensus, validation and ownership on the Sector Performance Standards.

1.3 METHODOLOGY

The assignment was undertaken in four phases, namely:

i) Review of the Sector Performance Standards 2010

ii) Consultations with different sectors and updating current status

iii) Stakeholder workshop to discuss the draft document

iv) Post draft consultations and finalization of the document

1.3.1 Sectors

The Task Force developed the SPS document in consultation with nine (9) Medium

Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) sectors as follows:

1. Agriculture, Rural and Urban Development Sector

The sector comprises of the following subsectors:

a) Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Development

b) Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development

c) National Land Commission

2. General Economic and Commerce Affairs Sector


a) Ministry of East African Affairs, Commerce and Tourism

b) Ministry of Industrialization and Enterprise Development

3

3. Energy, Infrastructure, Information, Communication and Technology

Sector


a) Ministry of Energy and Petroleum

b) Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure

c) Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology

4. Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector


a) Ministry of Sports and the Arts

b) Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services

5. Education, Science and Technology Sector

The sector comprises of the following subsector:

a) Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

6. Health Sector

The sector comprises of the following subsector:

a) Ministry of Health

7. Public Administration and International Relations Sector


a) The Presidency

b) Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Relations

c) Ministry of Devolution and Planning

d) The National Treasury

e) Vision 2030 Delivery Secretariat

f) Public Service Commission of Kenya

4

8. Governance, Justice, Law and Order Sector

The sector comprises of the following sub-sectors:

a) Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government

b) Office of the Attorney General and Department of Justice

9. Environment, Water and Sanitation Sector


a) Ministry of Environment, Water and Natural Resources

b) Ministry Mining

1.3.2 Development of Draft Sector Standards

Development of Sector Performance Standards entailed identification of Key Result

Areas, performance indicators and standards. The process involved;

i) Detailed review of various documents including:

The Kenya Vision 2030,

Second Medium Term Plan (MTPII) of Vision 2030,

Sector MTEF Reports,

MDAs’ Strategic Plans,

Global reports, and

Other relevant policy documents.

ii) Identification of international best practices from literature review,

iii) Consultative meetings with key stakeholders;

iv) Use of expert opinion especially where data was not available.

In the selection of the best performance indicators, the task force was guided by the

characteristics of good indicators which include;

Specific- Focused and clear

Measurable – Quantifiable and reflecting change

5

Attainable- reasonable in scope and achievable within the set time frame

Relevant- pertinent to the review of performance

Timely – time bound/ trackable. Progress can be charted chronologically.

Programmatically important – Linked to sector impact or achievement of objectives

that needed impact

i) Determination of Current Status

The Task Force obtained information through consultation with technical staff from

different MDAs, and review of relevant literature.

ii) Emerging Issues

Emerging issues such as climate change and productivity improvement in the public

sector were considered and incorporated in the relevant sectors.

iii) Stakeholder Validation workshop

A stakeholders’ validation workshop was held on 17th December, 2014 with the sector

representatives for Ministries to discuss the draft, receive feedback and initiate the

process of ownership of the SPS document. During the workshop, participants made

comments on key result areas, performance indicators, current status, and targets

which have been incorporated.

iv). Challenges

The following challenges were encountered:

Insufficient data on the current status of some indicators

Inadequate stakeholder understanding of the difference between outputs

and outcomes.

6

CHAPTER TWO

AGRICULTURE, RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

2.1 Introduction

The Agriculture, Rural and Urban Development (ARUD) Sector comprises of three sub-sectors namely: Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries; Land, Housing and Urban Development; and the National Land Commission. The Research and Development institutions in the sector are; Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) and Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI). The sector comprises of key sub-sectors that are considered key drivers for Kenya’s economic growth and critical for attainment of the 10 percent economic growth rate envisaged under the Kenya Vision 2030. It directly contributes to the national economy through enhancing food security, income generation, employment and wealth creation. The Agricultural sector directly contributes 25.3 percent of the GDP. The sector also contributes approximately 27 percent to GDP through linkages with manufacturing, distribution and other service related sectors. It further accounts for about 65 percent of Kenya’s total exports, 18 percent and 60 percent of the formal and total employment

respectively (Economic Survey 2014).

Land as a factor of production is critical to economic, social, political and cultural development. Secure access to land, sustainable land use planning and equitable distribution of land remain immensely important for food security, employment creation and generally the socio-economic development of the country. Housing is a basic human need and Article 43 1(b) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 emphasizes the right of every person to accessible and adequate housing, and to reasonable standards of sanitation. Housing is a means of promoting and mobilizing savings, expanding employment opportunities and economic activities which have multiplier effects in the economy. Urban areas and cities are an important component of the country’s social economic development. Urbanization has been growing at a very high rate. The 2009 census shows that 34% of the population of Kenya lived in urban areas and city. This growth is projected in the Kenya Vision 2030 to reach 60% of the population of Kenya by the year 2030. Public works facilitates development, maintenance and rehabilitation of Government Buildings and Other Public Works infrastructure in the country. This includes construction and maintenance of coastline infrastructure i.e. jetties and seawalls to improve water transport through provision of landing infrastructure and protecting land and property in low lying areas from erosion and flooding and sea wave action respectively.

7

Research and Development institutions in the sector play a critical role in strategic research of national importance. They undertake research and disseminate technologies, information and knowledge aimed at increasing productivity and competitiveness in the sector. The sector also has a number of Semi Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs) that contribute to national development through carrying out regulatory, commercial, service and training functions. A notable change in the sector is the operationalization of AFFA and KALRO Acts 2013. KALRO resulted in consolidation of four research institutions namely;

i. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI); ii. Kenya Sugar Research Foundation (KESREF); iii. Tea Research Foundation (TRF), and iv. Coffee Research Foundation (CRF).

The Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Authority (AFFA) has a composition of the following SAGAs;

i. Coconut Development Authority (CoDA); ii. Horticulture Crops Development Authority (HCDA); iii. Cotton Development Authority (CDA); iv. Coffee Board of Kenya (CBK); v. Tea Board of Kenya (TBK); vi. Kenya Sugar Board (KSB); vii. Pyrethrum Board of Kenya (PBK), and viii. Sisal Board of Kenya (SBK).

2.2 Vision and Mission

Vision A food secure nation with sustainable land management, modern urban infrastructure, and affordable and quality housing Mission To facilitate attainment of food security, affordable housing, modern urban infrastructure and sustainable land management for socio economic development

2.3 Strategic goal/objectives of the sector

Strategic Goal The Strategic goal for the sector is to attain food security, sustainable land management and development of affordable housing and urban infrastructure.

8

Strategic Objectives The strategic objectives of the sector are to:-

i. Create an Enabling environment for Agricultural development. ii. Increase Productivity and Outputs in agricultural sector. iii. Improve market access and trade. iv. Ensure national food security v. Strengthen Institutional capacity. vi. Ensure efficient and effective administration and sustainable management of

land resource vii. Facilitate the production of decent and affordable housing and enhanced estates

management services and tenancy relations. viii. Develop and maintain cost effective public buildings and other public works. ix. Protect land and property from sea wave action, flooding and erosion and

enhance accessibility between human settlements in and out of waters. x. Improve infrastructure development, connectivity and accessibility, safety and

security within urban areas and Metropolitan Regions. xi. Provide efficient and effective support services for sustainable land, housing and

urban development. xii. Facilitate access and use of land for socio-economic and environmental

sustainability. xiii. Enhance secure storage, access and retrieval of land and land resource data and

information. xiv. Facilitate an equitable and secure access to land and land based resources. xv. Promote optimal use of land for the benefit of the society. xvi. Develop capacity to enhance efficiency and transparency in service delivery.

2.5Key Result Areas

i. Food Security ii. Enhance Income/wealth iii. Value addition iv. Sustainability of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries as an enterprise v. Food Safety vi. Eradication of livestock diseases vii. Enhanced Technology Development viii. Increased Land access and security of tenure ix. Ease of doing business x. Improved access to affordable and decent housing xi. Safety and Security of people and property xii. Income and wealth creation xiii. Sustainability of the fisheries sector

9

xiv. Urban development and improved environmental sustainability xv. Development and maintenance of coastline infrastructure

10

Sector Performance Targets

SECTOR: AGRICULTURE, RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Sub-sector Key Result Areas

Performance Indicators

Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Agriculture Food Security % reduction in the number of food in secure households (those receiving famine relief)

2.1 Million1 5 5 702

Increase in the ratio of extension officers per household

1:10003 1:950 1:905 1:4004

%Increase in staple food output per hectare/per farmer/TFP

1.7 tons 5 5 41

Increase in cereal yield (kg per hectare)

1660 2087 2169 33905

%Increase in production of non-staple food crops (rice and wheat)

570,000 tons 5 5 8,140,000 wheat and 1,032,450 metric tons for rice6

% increase in yield per hectare (wheat)

3.6 Mt per hectare

5 5 7.1 metric tons per hectare

1 FEWS NET, Republic of Kenya and World Food Program (2012) says that the population in need of humanitarian assistance declined from 2.2 million in February 2012 to 2.1 million in September 2012. A decrease of 30% would leave only 630,000 households in need of famine relief. 2 This is equivalent to 630,000. We may not completely eradicate this due to influx of refugees, drought, floods and other natural disasters. 3Sanga, G. Kalungwizi, V. J. and Msuya, C. P. (2013) “Building an agricultural extension services system supported by ICTs in Tanzania: Progress made, Challenges remain” International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2013, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 80-99. 4Internationally recommended ratio 5Benchmarked against Mauritius cereal yield per hectare in 2013, according to world development indicators (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG/countries). Kenya (1660), Malawi (2087), Rwanda (2169), South Africa (3650), Mauritius (3390) 6This is benchmarked against Egypt in 2007 for wheat in metric tons and Pakistan in 2009 at 1032450 metric tons for rice.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.YLD.CREL.KG/countries

11




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 % increase in yield per hectare (rice)

4.625 Mt per hectare

5 5 3.587

% increase in number of bags in strategic food reserves

3.0 M 6M 10M 30m8

Increase in canned beef in strategic food reserves (MT)

N/A 2000 3000 9500

Increase in powdered milk in the strategic food reserves

N/A 4000 6000 19000

% increase in Metric tons

of cereal production 4,099,902 tons

5 10 1009

Number of months of national food consumption covered by strategic food reserves

1 2 6 24

Food price inflation

810 7 6 <511

7Benchmarked against Pakistan in 2009 8This is a 90 per cent increase based on the 2012 figure. 9409,990,200 tons 10Michal Andrle, Andrew Berg, R. Armando Morales, Rafael Portillo and Jan Vlcek (2013) Forecasting and Monetary Policy Analysis in Low-Income Countries: Food and non–Food Inflation in Kenya, International Monetary Fund Working Paper No WP/13/61. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/kenya/indicators shows that the food price inflation for 2013 was 11.1 per cent. 11Benchmarked with South Africa at 4.3 per cent in 2013; Botswana (4.4), Zambia (5.9), Namibia (4.8).

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/kenya/indicators

12




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 % in average household expenditure share of food items

4212 40 38 3013

Improvement in score on global Food Security index

37.6/100 40.1/100 50/100 86.814

Level of improvement in Food production index

148 152 160 188.215

% Increase in investment to agriculture sector out of total budget

3.5 10 12 1516

Enhance Income/wealth

% Increase in growth of horticultural exports

Ksh.89.9 billion

10 10 100

12Amendah, D. D, Buigut, S, Mohamed, S. (2014) Coping Strategies among Urban Poor: Evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. PLoS ONE 9(1): e83428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083428.........Food spending is the single most important component, accounting for 52% of total households' income and 42% of total expenditures. 13Benchmarked against South Africa at 22 per cent in 2013 14Global Food Security Index 2012: An assessment of food affordability, availability and quality A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit. Kenya was ranked number 77. The Global Food security for Kenya in 2013 was 36.4 and ranked at 80. United States had the best GFI in 2013 at 86.8. Kenya started appearing in the Global Food Security Index in 2012. 15 Source: World Development indicators: This figure is for 2010. In 2011, it was 123.12 and Kenya was ranked number 51 out of 188 countries. Cameroon (152), Mali (160) Kuwait 166 in 2013. Angola had the highest food production index in 2011 at 188.2 16The Maputo Declaration expects countries in African to allocate 10% of their budget to the agricultural sector.

13




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 Increase of employment in Agriculture(millions)

13.817 14 15 19.7418

Value addition

Increase in the proportion of processed agricultural exports

9 15 20 100

Increase in the number of agro-processing technologies developed

5 8 10 20

% Increase in contribution of agricultural exports to Kenya’s foreign exchange earnings

26 30 50 100

Improved crop production index

172.9 173 174 17519

Improved food production index

148.2 160 168 18520

% Increase in annual growth in agricultural value added as a % of GDP

3021 35 50 100

17This is 60% of the total working population of 23.1 million people out of an estimated population of 42 million people 18This will be 47 per cent of the population estimated at 42 million benchmarked against India’s % as at 2012. 19World Development Indicators (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS/countries) shows Mauritania crop production index for 2012 was 175 so we benchmark Kenya against this. 20Benchmarked against Marshall Island food production index for 2012 (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS/countries) Mali (160), Marshall islands (185), Malawi (173), Rwanda (168.5) 21World Development Indicators (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS/countries)

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS/countries



14




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Sustainability of agriculture as an enterprise

% Increase of farmers accessing credits

N/A 10 20 100

% Increase in the number of farmers accessing micro-credit through Public Private Partnership

349,000 farmers22

10 10 100

% Increase in the number of small scale farmers accessing credit

N/A 10 30 100

% Increase of farmers aware of key market information

60 %23 65 70 100

% Increase in number of Agriculture farmers covered by the Global Index Insurance Facility

100,000 10 30 100

% Increase in number of farmers adopting improved seed varieties

80 85 90 100

22Kenya Agricultural Commodity Exchange ltd http://www.kacekenya.co.ke/news.asp?ID=290 .......Kenya government in partnership with the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)…… So far, this innovative agriculture financing scheme has helped leverage a total of 50 million dollars of financing to benefit 49,000 small holder farmers in the form of direct lending to purchase farm inputs. 23Research ICT Africa (2012)

15




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 Establishment of stabilization funds and buffer stocks

Nil 1 1 3

Decrease in the number of counties under risk of flood/drought

12 10 8 0

% Increase in Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)

4 % 10 20 70.2 24

Food Safety % Increase in number of

small scale horticultural export farmers complying with international food standards

30 35 50 100

% Reduction on incidences reported illness by food poisoning

9,215,589 cases

10 85 9525

Livestock Sustainable of the livestock

sector as an enterprise

% Increase in number of livestock farmers covered by the Global Index Insurance Facility

300000 10 30 100

% Increase in strategic feed reserves in bales

Nil 1.5 million 10 100

% Increase in 3 1526 20 2527

24Benchmarked against Pakistan in 2012 World Development Indicators: Israel (31.8), Mauritius (22.5). 25Benchmarked against Botswana (http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/f/food_poisoning/stats-country.htm) 26The livestock development sub-sector contributed to about 42 per cent of agricultural GDP and about 10 per cent directly to the overall GDP in 2013. 27Livestock production contributed 3.3% o Kenya’s GDP, 20% of Ethiopia’s and 8% of Sudan’s GDP in 2003.

http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/f/food_poisoning/stats-country.htm

16




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 contribution of livestock

to GDP

Improvement in livestock production index

113.0 131 143 194.628

% Increase in number of pastoralists buying index-base livestock insurance

5000 10 30 100

% Increase in contribution of livestock sales to household income

4029 45 50 60

Eradication of livestock diseases and pests

% Increase in proportion of livestock branded

N/A 960,000 20 100

% Increase in number of disease free zones and maintained

N/A 5 10 100

Value

addition

Increase the number of satellite abattoirs

4 6 10 400

% Increase in value of hides, skins and leather production chain

Ksh.7.55 billion

10 21 100

Increase in the value of US$42 US$90 US$100 US$15230

28World Development Indicators: Mauritius (131.3), Nigeria (127.3), Rwanda (143.3), Senegal (142.4), Sierra Leone (194.6) 29Index Based Livestock Insurance in Northern Kenya and Southern Ethiopia Protecting pastoralists against the risk of drought related livestock mortality (http://www.nerpo.org.za/downloads/NERPO_presentation_Sep2013.pdf) 30 The value of Kenya’s exports of hides, skins and leather was US$83,404,000 in 201; Italy (US$ 5,354,780,158), Ethiopia (US $152,274,390) (Source: UN COMTRADE)

http://www.nerpo.org.za/downloads/NERPO_presentation_Sep2013.pdf

17




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

livestock products exported (Hides, skins and

leather) ( Billion )

Fisheries Income and Wealth

% Increase in Fishing Industry growth rates

3.4 5 7 10

% Increase in contribution of Fishing to GDP

0.4 0.5 0.7 31 10

% Increase in production from fish farming

21,487 tons32

20 30 100

Sustainability of the fisheries sector

% Increase in number of fish ponds constructed in the country

48,00033 20 30 100

Number of rivers restocked with certified appropriate fingerlings

9 12 14 20

% Increase in number of fish fingerlings supplied to fish farmers

28 million fingerlings

20 30 100

31 Benchmarked against Norway in 2010 32P S Orina, J G Maina, S M Wangia, E G Karuri, P G Mbuthia, B Omolo, G O Owiti, S Musa and J M Munguti (2014), Situational analysis of Nile tilapia and African catfish hatcheries management: a case study of Kisii and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya, Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (5) 2014. 33 In the financial year 2009/2010 and in a period of 4 years the government injected Kshs 6 billion (US$ 75 million) to construct 48,000 fish ponds in the mapped aquaculture prime areas across the country: P S Orina, J G Maina, S M Wangia, E G Karuri, P G Mbuthia, B Omolo, G O Owiti, S Musa and J M Munguti (2014), Situational analysis of Nile tilapia and African catfish hatcheries management: a case study of Kisii and Kirinyaga counties in Kenya, Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (5) 2014.

18




Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 % Increase in volume of fish and fish products exported

15,421 metric tons

2034 30 100

Value addition

% Increase in the number of fish processing and packaging factories

15 20 30 100

Enhanced

Technology Development

% Increase in number of new fish products and processes

835 10 20 100

% Increase in number of techniques for reducing post-harvest losses developed for fish

636

10

20

100

34Nepad Partnership for African Fisheries (2014), Kenya aquaculture to export 150,000 metric tons of fish in 2014, http://www.africanfisheries.org/news/kenya-aquaculture-export-150000-metric-tonnes-fish-2014. Mauritius exported 54867 tons. 35 1. Fish fillets; 2. Sundried fish; 3. Smoked fish; 4. Fish fingers; 5.Fish Sausages; 6. Fish maws; 7.Cooked Tuna Loins; 8.Frozen Octopus; 361.Solar/sun drying; 2. Fish smoking; 3.Refrigeration: 4. Icing; 5.Vacuum Packaging; 6. Freezing

http://www.africanfisheries.org/news/kenya-aquaculture-export-150000-metric-tonnes-fish-2014

http://www.africanfisheries.org/news/kenya-aquaculture-export-150000-metric-tonnes-fish-2014

19




Status (2012)

PERFORMANCE TARGETS

2015 2017 2030

Land Housing and Urban Development

Increased Land access and security of tenure

% Level of implementation of

National Land Information Management System (NLIMS)

1037 50 80 100

% level of implementation of

the Kenya National Spatial

Data Infrastructure

5038 85 90 100

% increase in number of

adjudicated sections finalized and registered39

33 50 80 100

37 The Ministry developed Integrated Records Management System; Initiated the safeguarding and digitization of land records at the Ministry headquarters, Mombasa, Kitale, Nakuru land registries; re-engineered and redesigned the Ministry’s processes and procedures in preparation for developing a Geographical Information System (GIS) based National Land Information Management System; developed and implemented the Integrated Land Rent Information System and captured details of 150,000 Government leased plots into the system;

38Kenya National Spatial Data Infrastructure (KNSDI) Policy is at 50% complete and the center is at 95% complete.This will provide an appropriate framework for preparation and implementation of national, regional and local area land use plans and ensure that the planning process is integrated, participatory and meets stakeholder needs. 39 There are over 139 adjudication sections in the country. 46 sections have been finalized and registered while 93 sections will be finalized by 2030.

This translates to 1.56 million titles covering 8 million hectares that have been registered from adjudication sections and over 200,000 household families settled in 460

settlement schemes

20




Status (2012)

PERFORMANCE TARGETS

2015 2017 2030

Number of formal and

informal settlements

regularized

1140 20 25 30

Ease of doing

business

Reduction in number of procedures required to register property

- 9 6 <3

Reduction in days for registration of properties

73 16 14 <10

% reduction of cost of registering property as a proportion of the property value

4 3 2 <2

Improved access to affordable and decent housing

41Number of households in slums and informal settlements with access to improved facilities and services

450,208 495,398 600,000 5 million

40 The regularization process entails the following: a) Preparation of base maps, b) Enumeration of squatters, c) Preparation of draft plans, d) Validation of draft plans by

stakeholders, e) Publication for wider stakeholders comments, f) Processing for approval (Vetting & submission), g) Approval. The Settlement schemes reguralized were: 1)

Kambi Somali Slum Settlement, Nakuru County, 2) Talai Settlement, Kericho County, 3) Manyatta Arab Settlement Scheme, Kisumu County, 4) Maganda Settlement,

Mombasa County, 5) Kiriko Settlement, Nyandarua County, 6) Shingalla Settlement, Kilifi County, 7) Sabharwal ‘B’ Settlement, Kwale County, 8)Kongorwonin Squatter

Settlement, Baringo County, 9) KahehoSquater Settlement, Nyandarua County, 10) Ngorika Settlement, Nyandarua County, 11) Mweiga Informal Settlement, Nyeri County

41 This is achieved through implementation of Kenya Slum Upgrading Program (KENSUP) and Kenya Informal Settlement Improvement Project (KISIP). The facilities provided

include access roads, flood lighting, water reticulation, sanitation facilities, footpaths, schools, health centres, social halls/community centres, land tenure security and housing

units in slums and informal settlements. The household density is based on the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2009 census. Figures in the matrix are cumulative.

21




Status (2012)

PERFORMANCE TARGETS

2015 2017 2030

42Number of households benefitting from serviced land for housing development

1,170 1,970 2,500 10,000

Urban Development and Improved Environmental Sustainability

% increase in proportion of Urban population with

access to improved sanitation facilities i.e. Flush or pour-flush to piped sewer system or septic tank or pit latrine/toilet169

3743 39 42 65

% households connected to a sewage system in urban areas

70 77.5 80 100

Safety and Security of people property44

Number of fire stations

per 100,000 population in metro region

0.1 0.5 0.8 1

42Urban households benefitting from installed physical infrastructure such as access roads, sewerage system, storm water drainage, trunk water lines and street lighting. The installed infrastructure lowers the overall cost of housing development to the investors who choose to move into such areas. Figures in the matrix are cumulative.

43 This is the average % of sewerage coverage for Nairobi Metropolitan Region which covers the following Counties; Kajiado 50%, Kiambu 23.3%, Machakos 40%, and

Nairobi 35%.However, data for Murang’a County was not available.

44 The region with a population of 4,620,524 is served with 5 fire stations, 8 fire engines and 207 trained personnel as at 2012. This capacity is below international standard

of 1 fire station per 100,000 people, 2 fire engines per fire station and 2 firemen for every 1000 people (Nairobi Metropolitan Disaster Management Strategic Plan (2014-

2019)

22




Status (2012)

PERFORMANCE TARGETS

2015 2017 2030

Number of fire trucks/engines per

100,000 population

1 1.1 1.7 2

Development

and

maintenance of

coastline

infrastructure

Meters of seawall constructed and rehabilitated

675 1000 1250 3000

Number of jetties constructed and rehabilitated

2 1 3 15

23

CHAPTER 3

GENERAL ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS SECTOR

3.1 Introduction

The General Economic and Commercial Affairs (GECA) Sector comprises of two Sub

sectors namely: East African Affairs, Commerce and Tourism; and Industrialization and

Enterprise Development. The East African Affairs, Commerce and Tourism sub-sector is

comprised of two State Departments; East African affairs and Commerce and Tourism.

The Industrialization and Enterprise Development sub-sector comprises of two

Directorates: Industrialization and Cooperative Development.

The Sector is a key contributor to economic growth of the country as reflected by its

share in GDP currently estimated at about 33percent. The Sector plays a key role in

accelerating economic growth, employment creation, poverty reduction, industrial

development and achieving equitable distribution of resources as well as attainment of

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

through trade, tourism and investments.

The Sector plays a significant role towards achievement of the Vision 2030 goals. The

second MTP of the Kenya Vision 2030 has identified the GECA sector as a priority sector

under the economic pillar which aims at achieving an average economic growth rate of

10% per annum and sustaining it till 2030. This will be achieved through:

i. Promoting trade within and outside the country by strengthening economic

partnerships with our neighbours in East Africa and the rest of Africa;

ii. Improving the overall climate of doing business in Kenya;

iii. Transforming Kenya into a top 10 long haul tourist destination in the world that

offers a high-value, diverse and distinctive visitor experience;

iv. Strengthening Cooperatives to enhance collective marketing, mobilization of

financial resources and technological transfer; and,

v. Promoting growth and diversification in manufacturing.


Vision

A globally competitive economy with sustainable and equitable socio-economic

development

24

Mission

To promote, co-ordinate and implement integrated socio-economic policies and

programmes for a rapidly industrializing economy.

3.3 Strategic goals/objectives of the Sector

a. Strategic Goals

The Sector works towards achievement of the following strategic goals;

i. Growth and development of commerce

ii. Tourism promotion and development

iii. Promotion of regional integration and cooperation

iv. Savings and investment mobilisation

v. Employment creation

vi. Industrial and entrepreneurship development.

b. Strategic Objectives

In order to achieve the goals of the Vision 2030 and the Medium Term Plan, 2013-2017,

the General Economic and Commercial Affairs Sector will focus on the following strategic

objectives:

i. To undertake policy, legal and institutional reforms for the development of the

sector

ii. Build Capacity for development of the Sector

iii. To promote research and development (R&D) and adoption of innovation and

technology

iv. To broaden and deepen Kenya’s participation in the EAA

v. Support growth and development of domestic and regional trade

vi. Broaden and deepen export markets and products

vii. To promote value addition, standardization and productivity improvement and

market access

viii. To promote micro, small, medium and large enterprises

ix. To increase tourists arrivals and earnings.

x. To mobilize savings and investment resources for industrial and enterprise

development

25

3.4 Sub Sectors and their Mandates

The sector has 2 sub-sectors whose mandates are as highlighted below:

East African Affairs, Commerce and Tourism

i. Formulation of National Policies on Regional Integration

ii. Co-ordination and implementation of Regional Integration initiatives (COMESA,

EAC and COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite Free Trade Area)

iii. Coordinating the implementation of the EAC regional programmes and projects

iv. Implementation of the Treaty for the establishment of the EAC

v. Kenya South Sudan Support Programme (KESSP)

vi. National Trade Policy Development

vii. Fair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection

viii. Promotion of Retail and Wholesale Markets and Trade

ix. Business Premises Dispute Resolution mechanism

x. Promotion of Small Medium Enterprises and other interest groups through training,

counselling, consultancy and Research

xi. Promotion of exports

xii. Tourism Policy Management

xiii. Tourism Development and Promotion

Industrialization and Enterprise Development

i. Buy Kenya policy

ii. Co-operative Policy and Implementation

iii. Co-operative Financing Policy

iv. Co-operative Legislation and Support Services

v. Co-operative Governance, Education and training

vi. Co-operative Production, Marketing and Value Addition

vii. Co-operative Audit services

viii. Co-operative Savings, Credit and other Financial Services Policy

ix. Development of Micro and Small Business

x. Industrialization Policy

xi. Kenya Property Rights Policy (Patents, Trade Marks, Service Marks, and

innovation)

xii. Leather Development

xiii. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development and training

xiv. Private Sector Development Strategy and Policy

xv. Promotion of Co-operative Ventures

26

xvi. Quality Control including Industrial Standards

xvii. Special Economic Zones

xviii. Conduct Research and Development in Industrial and allied technologies

3.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies

The Sector has twenty six (26) Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies which include:

i. Bomas of Kenya (BoK)

ii. Tourism Fund (TF) {Formerly CTDLT}

iii. Kenya Tourism Board (KTB)

iv. Tourism Finance Corporation (TFC) {Formerly KTDC}

v. Tourism Regulatory Authority

vi. Kenya Utalii College (KUC)

vii. Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC)

viii. Kenya Safari Lodges and Hotels

ix. Export Promotion Council (EPC)

x. Kenya National Trading Corporation (KNTC)

xi. Anti-counterfeit Agency (ACA)

xii. Export Processing Zones Authority (EPZA)

xiii. East African Portland Cement Company(EAPCC)

xiv. Industrial and Commercial Development Corporation (ICDC)

xv. Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS)

xvi. Kenya Industrial Estates (KIE)

xvii. Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI)

xviii. Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI)

xix. Kenya Investment Authority (Ken Invest)

xx. Kenya Leather Development Council (KLDC)

xxi. Kenya National Accreditation Services (KENAS)

xxii. Kenya Wine Agencies Limited (KWAL)

xxiii. Micro and Small Enterprises Authority (MSEA)

xxiv. New Kenya Cooperative Creameries (NKCC)

xxv. Numerical Machining Complex (NMC)

xxvi. Sacco Society Regulatory Authority (SASRA)

27

3.6 Key Result Areas

The following key result areas have been identified following review of mandates

of various state departments in the GECA sector:

i. Department of East African Affairs

Deepening Regional Integration Growth in Trade and Industry

ii Department of Commerce and Tourism

a) Commerce Export growth and global competitiveness Contribution to economic growth of 10% p.a. Employment, prosperity and equity

b) Tourism

Global competitiveness Contribution to economic growth of 10% p.a. Employment, prosperity and equity

Sustainability

c) Industry Industrial growth and development Contribution to economic growth of 10% p.a. Employment, prosperity and equity. Global competitiveness. MSEs Development

d) Cooperative development Access cooperative financial services Strengthened marketing through cooperatives

28


SECTOR: GENERAL ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS

SUB-SECTOR KEY RESULT AREAS

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

East African

Affairs

Deepening Regional Integration

Harmonization of EAC Education Standards45

Structures and framework of the harmonization of EAC education systems and training curricula developed

Structures for TIVET education to be developed. Harmonized examination and awards format for primary, secondary and teacher education

National curricula development agencies to implement harmonized EAC curricula

Fully harmonized EAC education standards

Mutual Recognition of Academic and Professional qualifications within EAC

Engineers, Accountants, Architects have signed Mutual recognition of Academic and professional qualification (MRAs)

Veterinarians, Lawyers, Nurses MRAs to be in place

Other professions

All Professionals to have MRAs

45 According to the Report of the 12th meeting of the Sectoral Council on Education, Science and Technology, Culture and Sports of 3rd October, 2014

29




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Growth in Trade and Industry

Increase in Kenya’s exports going to EAC (Million USD)46

1544.4 (2011)

1644 1790

2000

Commerce Export growth and global competitiveness

% Increase in COMESA regional market share47

19 25 30 5048

Improvement in Logistics Performance Index(1 to 5 best)

2.8 2.9 3 4.049

Improvement in ranking of Ease of Doing Business (rank among 181 countries)50

122 110 90 <50

Increase in number of functional legal metrology labs

4 6 8 10

46 According to EAC Facts and Figures Report 2012

47Include efficiency of customs and other border procedures, quality of transport and IT infrastructure, logistics competence, etc.

48 Kenya had the largest market share of 19% for intra COMESA exports in 2012 followed by Egypt, Congo DR and Zambia with shares of 16%, 12% and 11% respectively.

49 Brazil in 2014 was at 3.6 while Kenya was at 2.8 (Trade logistics – World Bank report 2014)

50 Ease of doing business report 2013-Kenya ranked 129, Malaysia-6, SA-41 Tunisia-51, Ghana-67.

30




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Contribution to economic growth of 10% p.a.

% Increase in number of formal establishments

3.11 10 20 100

Increase in FDI inflow (% of GDP)51

0.6 1.5 2.0 6.0

Decrease in top 5 exports share(% of merchandise exports)

50.5 48 45 20

% Growth in share of formal employment in trade, Restaurants and hotels

2.6 3.0 3.5 10.0

Employment, prosperity & equity

% Decrease in total employment in the informal sector

89.7 80 75 40

Tourism

Global

competitiveness

Improved Ranking among

African destinations

752

6

5

3

Increase in global market

share of tourism53 (%)

0.17 0.19 0.27 1.38

51 World Bank report 2013 Indonisia-0.6, Ghana-0.1, Botswana-0.1.

52According to UNWTO World Tourism Barometer April 2014, Kenya (1,710,800) was ranked 7th in terms of visitor arrivals after Morocco (9,375,000), South Africa (9,188,000), Tunisia (5,950,000), Algeria (2,634,000), Mozambique (2,113,000) and Zimbabwe (1,794,000).

53Estimated using the Actual/projected visitor arrivals in Kenya divided by the respective UNWTO Actual/Projected global visitor arrivals

31




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

% increase in number of 4

and 5 star hotels

1854 25 33 40

Increase in number of

international tourist arrivals

1.7 2.7 3.06 5.45

Increase in average

spending per tourist per day

(Kshs)

56,47055 63,609 65,360 73,394

Contribution to

economic growth of

10% p.a.

% Increase in contribution

of

Tourism to GDP

12.156 12.25 12.4 14

Increase in tourism revenue,

Kshs billion57

96 143 200 91858

54Source is Kenya Gazette notice no. 62 of 13th June 2003 (Vision 2030 has 18%).

Source: Economic Survey, 2014

55 Estimated as Tourism earnings divided by visitor arrivals. In 2012, tourism earnings were KShs 96 billion while tourist arrivals were 1.7 million.

56The total contribution of Travel & Tourism to GDP (including wider effects from investment, the supply chain and induced income impacts): - WTTC Report: Travel and Tourism: Economic Impact Kenya, 2014.

57 The United Nations World Tourism Organization uses the International Tourism receipts and International tourism earnings as the two key indicators for measuring tourism performance in various destinations. Others are derived from this two.

58 Estimated as a product of Projected tourists arrivals and current average spend per visitors

32




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Employment,

prosperity and

equity

% Contribution of Tourism

to Formal employment

10.659 12 16 20

Sustainability % increase in proportion of

tourists from non-traditional

sources60

48 50 56 64

Improved ICCA Ranking of

Kenya as a M.I.C.E

Destination61

56 51 44 20

Increased bed-nights (in

Millions) by domestic

tourists

2.862 3.7 4.5 12

59Total Contribution of Travel & Tourism to employment (including wider effects from investments, supply chain and induced income impacts): - WTTC Report: Travel and

Tourism: Economic Impact Kenya, 2014.

60In 2012, 713,000 out of 1,371,000 departing visitors from Kenya were from non-traditional sources i.e. other sources except the UK, Germany, Italy France and USA.

Calculated as follows: traditional considered as the top 5 source countries; the rest are non-traditional: Source Economic survey 2014

61 ICCA:- International Congress and Convention Association; MICE: - Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions. Source:- ICCA Country and City Ranking 2012

Report.

62 Source: Economic Survey 2014

33




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

INDUSTRY Industrial Growth and Development

% Annual growth of manufactured value added63

4.8 5.4 6 15

Increase in FDI in manufacturing sector (US$ billions)64

1.2 3 4.2 10

Increase in manufactured GDP per unit of capital (US$)65

60 70 100 300

Increase in manufactured GDP per employee (US$)66

0.05 0.055 0.06 0.07

Increase in number of SME parks developed67

0 0 10 47

63The annual growth rate of least developed countries was 1% while the emerging industrial economies were 8% in 2012 (UNIDO REPORT, 2013).With the current emphasis

and huge budgetary allocation to the manufacturing sector, the outputis expected to increase. Malaysia (1970–1997) manufacturing grew by 13%,Indonesia (1966–1997) grew

by 12 %(UNIDO REPORT, 2013)

64Developing countries took 52% of global FDI manufacturing inflows in 2012 due to the biggest fall in FDI inflows in developed countries which accounted for only 42 per cent

of global flows. Developing economies also generated almost one third of global FDI outflows (World Investment Report 2013)

65In 2011 the value for Uganda was US 29,Tanzania US 40 while Kenya was US 60(UNIDO Report 2013).To realize V2030 it is estimated be 300.

66The base year 2012,the figure was calculate from the 2014 Economic Survey data where by manufacturing GDP was Kshs.1049.3 billion and the employees was 272,3900.The

projections are based on the growth rate of the manufactured value added ~10% as per V2030.

67By 2030 every county is expected to have one SME Park.

34




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Increase in amount of industrial credit/capital issued (Ksh. billion)68

183 200 260 300

Increase in number of firms registered outside Nairobi (industries)69

10 15 30 70

% Increase in contribution of textiles to Manufacturing GDP70

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.3

% Increase in contribution of Leather & leather products to Manufacturing GDP71

0.023 0.03 0.05 0.4

Contribution to economic growth of 10% p.a.

% Increase in share of manufactured value added in GDP72

6.8 11 13 32

68 Due to expected reduction in the interest rates and expected growth in the sector as envisaged in V2030 credit is expected to increase to realize the vision.

69 The devolution and the subsequent preparation of county integrated development plans (as per requirement of County governments Act 2012) most of the firms will be

attracted to invest in rural areas.

70The projections are based on that fact that textile is the priority area the government is determined to transform to realize V2030

71The projections are based on that fact that the leather sector is the priority area the government is determined to revive to realize V2030.

72Due to ambitious agenda for industrialization and massive investment in leather, textile and Special Economic Zones the manufacturing sector is expected to contribution to GDP increase. In Malaysia manufacturing contributes 28%.South Korea 32% and Thailand 36% (Industrialization Road Map).

35




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Employment, prosperity &equity

%Increase in contribution of manufacturing sector to total employment73

(1.7) 10 12 57

% increase in number of industrial research findings commercialized74

9 15 18 20

Global competitiveness

% Increase in share of industrial products in regional market75

71 75 80 80

% Increase in share of manufactured exports to total exports76

7 10 15 41

73In developing countries the in 2009 manufacturing sector was accounting for about 50% of the total employment(UNIDO 2013)

74Level of commercialization of industrial research (status and targets) is the % of the number of technologies developed against the number of research projects on industrial

and allied technologies completed. Projections based on the research completed. 75The ambitious programme by the government to spur the growth through manufacturing the sector is expected to increase the manufactured in the region market.

76 The ambitious programme by the government to spur the growth through manufacturing the sector is expected to increase the manufactured products to be exported.

36




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Increase in number of accredited testing laboratories77

13 19 50 100

% Increase in number of industrial products with standardization marks 78

7239 5 11 66

Increase in number of enterprises operating in EPZs79

82 106 162 300

% Growth in export earnings from EPZs80

3.0 21.0 28.0 25

Increase in contribution of EPZs to total exports81

7.72 10 15 20

Increase in number of industrial innovations patented82

100 150 217 300

77According to Kenya Accreditation Services (KENAS)

78 Targeting is based on assumption of product saturation and specialization as envisaged in Vision 2030

79Many enterprises will be operating due to infrastructure improvement which will increase earnings, employment and output as envisaged by V2030.Kenya economic Survey

2013 -KIPPRA. 80 Economic Survey 2013 -KIPRRA 81 Same as in 20 822015, 2017 and 2030 targets are based on the expected focus and deliberate shift towards improving the quality and scopes of Research, Technology and Innovation

programmes and activities under the transformation of the Institute into a world class Industrial Research Institution in line with Vision 2030.

37




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Industrial Patent Rights (IPRs)Registered

23 30 45 50

% increase in level of awareness on IPRs83

14.6 30 45 75

Increase in number of people/firms receiving technical advice on Intellectual Property Rights84

4925 5,215 7,509 80,340

Increase in number of Madrid Trade Mark registrations85

1513 1,305 1,580 5,455

Increase in number of registered (National) trademarks86

2,500 4,048 5,828 62,355

MSEs Development % Increase in Growth of MSEs87

N/A 20 30 50

Increase in the Number of MSMEs successfully incubated88

1168 1468 1967 3000

83 The level of the awareness is expected to rise at 10% per year. 84 With 20% growth is maintained per year the targets will be achieved.

85Madrid trademarks are projected to grow at 10% per year 86National trademarks depend on the prevailing economic conditions thus are expected to grow by 20%. 87Newly established MSEA will establish the status as at 2012. 88KIE

38




PERFORMANCE TARGETS

Status 2012

2015 2017 2030

Cooperative Development

Access to cooperative Financial services

% increase in proportion of

national savings through

cooperative SACCOS

(Billions)

380 15 9 81

% Increase in job opportunities created by cooperative societies/District Cooperative Unions/their Affiliates

400,000 0 50 40

Strengthened marketing through cooperatives

Increase in number of producer cooperatives involved in value addition

60 70 80 90

% Increase in the share of wholesale price going to producers

80 82 83 85

39

CHAPTER 4

ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INFORMATION, COMMUNICATIONS AND

TECHNOLOGY SECTOR

4.1 Introduction

The Energy, Infrastructure and Information, Communications and Technology Sector

consists of Energy and Petroleum; Transport and Infrastructure; and Information,

Communications and Technology Subsectors. In the Kenya Vision 2030, infrastructure

development has been recognized as an enabler for sustained development of the

economy and particularly for the seven key Sectors identified under the economic pillar.

The Energy, Infrastructure and ICT Sector play a major facilitating role in realization of

the key targets under this pillar.

The Infrastructure Sector aspires to be a world-class provider of cost-effective public

utility infrastructure facilities and services’ in the areas of energy, transport and ICT that

meet international standards to make Kenya a globally competitive and prosperous

country.

The strategies and measures to be pursued in the medium term include:

Supporting the development of infrastructure initiatives around flagship projects;

Strengthening the institutional framework for infrastructure development;

Raising the efficiency and quality of infrastructure as well as increasing the pace

of infrastructure projects so that they are completed as envisaged;

Protecting the environment as a national asset; and

Conserving infrastructure for the benefit of the future generations and the wider

international community.

Other measures include encouraging Private Sector participation in the provision of

infrastructure services through the Public-Private-Partnerships (PPPs) framework.

The sector aims at improving both the quality and quantity of Infrastructure facilities in

order to contribute to the attainment of an accelerated and sustained economic growth.

In the long run, the aim is to provide an enabling environment for socio-economic

development.

40


Vision

A world-class provider of cost-effective public utility infrastructure facilities and services’

in the areas of energy, transport and ICT

Mission

To provide efficient, affordable and reliable infrastructure for sustainable economic

growth and development

4.3 Strategic Goals/Objectives of the Sector

Strategic goals

i.Accelerating on-going infrastructure development, focusing on quality, aesthetics and

functionality of the infrastructure services;

ii.Infrastructure development to support identified flagship projects to ensure

contribution to the economic growth and social equity goals;

iii.Improving efficiency and effectiveness of the infrastructure development process

at all levels of planning, contracting, and construction;

iv.Providing a utility Sector that is modern, customer- oriented and technologically-enabled

to provide efficient, cost-effective, quality services to all citizens;

v.Enable universal access to IT enabled services to promote a knowledge based society;

vi.Develop modern national ICT infrastructure for sustainable development;

vii.To provide competitive, reliable, safe and sustainable access to energy for all while

protecting and conserving the environment;

viii.To build Human Resource Capacity in the Oil/Gas and mineral sector.

ix.To promote exploration and development of Geothermal and Fossil resources.

x.To promote development of new and renewable energy sources.

xi.To increase access to electricity in rural areas.

xii.To develop and enforce regulations and standards to ensure safe, secure and

41

efficient transport and infrastructure systems;

xiii.To develop and maintain sustainable transport and infrastructure to facilitate

efficient movement of goods and people;

xiv.To undertake research and implement the findings for an efficient transport and

infrastructure systems; and

xv.To mobilize resources and build capacity for technical and professional staff.

4.4 Strategic objectives

i.Strengthening the institutional framework for infrastructure development and

accelerating the speed of completion of priority projects;

ii.Raising efficiency and quality of infrastructure projects;

iii.Developing and maintaining an integrated, safe and efficient transport network;

iv.Benchmark infrastructure facilities and services provision with globally acceptable

performance standards targeting enhanced customer satisfaction;

v.Enhancing private Sector participation in the provision of infrastructure facilities

and Services strategically complemented by public sector interventions;

vi.Developing and strengthening policies and capabilities of the Sector;

vii.Enhancing economic productivity by lowering transaction costs;

viii.Reduction of access to cost of ICT services through affordable connectivity,

hardware and software;

ix.Utilize energy as a tool to accelerate economic empowerment for the National

and County Governments as well as urban and rural development;

x.Improve access to quality, reliable and affordable energy services;

xi.Prioritize and promote development of indigenous primary and secondary energy

resources;

xii.Promote exploration and development of Oil/Gas.

xiii.Increased installed generation Capacity.

xiv.Promote energy efficiency and conservation;

xv.Ensure that a comprehensive, integrated and well informed energy sector plan

is put in place for effective development;

xvi.Foster international co-operation in energy trade, investments and development; and

xvii.Provide for the phased transfer of provision of energy services to the Counties

in accordance with Article 174 of the Constitution

42

4.5 Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (AGAs and

SAGAs)

There are various AGAs and SAGAs in the sector.

4.5.1 Energy and Petroleum Subsector

i. Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited (KPLC)

ii. Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC)

iii. Rural Electrification Authority (REA)

iv. Energy Tribunal

v. Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC)

vi. National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK)

vii. Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen)

viii. Kenya Petroleum Refineries Ltd (KPRL)

ix. Geothermal Development Company (GDC)

x. Kenya Electricity Transmission Company (KETRACO)

xi. Kenya Nuclear Electricity Board (KNEB).

xii. Independent Power Producers (IPPs)

4.5.2 Transport and Infrastructure Subsector

i. The Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA)

ii. The Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA)

iii. Kenya Urban Roads Authority (KURA)

iv. The Kenya Roads Board (KRB)

v. Engineers Registration Board (ERB);

vi. Kenya Civil Aviation Authority (KCAA)

vii. Kenya Airports Authority (KAA)

viii. Kenya Ports Authority (KPA)

ix. Kenya Ferry Services (KFS)

x. Kenya National Shipping Line (KNSL)

xi. Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC)

xii. Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA)

xiii. National Transport Safety Authority (NTSA)

43

4.5.3 Information Communications and Technology Subsector

i. Communication Authority of Kenya (CAK)

ii. Kenya Broadcasting Corporation (KBC)

iii. Kenya Films Classification Board (KFCB)

iv. Kenya Film Commission (KFC)

v. National Communications Secretariat (NCS) Postal Corporation of Kenya (PCK)

vi. Communications Appeal Tribunal (CAT)

vii. Brand Kenya Board (BKB)

viii. Kenya Year Book Editorial Board (KYEB)

ix. Kenya Information Communication Technology Board (KICTB)

x. Media Council of Kenya (MCK)

xi. Kenya Institute of Mass Communication (KIMC)

xii. Konza Technopolis Development Authority (KoTDA)


i. Roads Improve accessibility of all parts of Kenya

ii. Transport Accessibility of transport facilities Transport Safety and Security Affordability and Reliability of transport facilities

iii. Energy Easy access to energy Customer satisfaction Enhanced level of energy generation

iv. ICT Increased internet, radio, television and telephone access and usage Access to, and use of, ICT by households and individuals Increased cyber security/safety Increase in E-government Services Modernization of mass media equipment Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO)

44


SECTOR: ENERGY, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Status 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Roads Improve accessibility of all parts of Kenya89

% Increase in number of kilometers of rural roads constructed

3,362 10 3590 80

% Increase in number of kilometers of urban roads

2381 10 30 100

% Increase in number of kilometers of roads maintained and rehabilitated

195,075.76 40 10091 100

% Increase in the proportion of classified roads maintained and rehabilitated

52,512.78 40 50 100

% increase in kilometers of Class A (International) roads constructed and rehabilitated

2,96792 10 2093 3,588

Increase in kilometers of National roads constructed and rehabilitated94

4,716 1414 2411 220

89 Targets and indicators based on the Global Competitiveness Index (World Economic Forum 2012-2013) and Recommendations by World Bank 90 Second MTP target is to construct and rehabilitate 1,675 km county roads. 91 Second MTP target is to routinely maintain 200,000 km roads (40,000kms annually) 92KeNHA 2012-2013 Annual Report 93 Second MTP target is to rehabilitate and Upgrade 600 km transnational trunk road. 94Second MTP target is to construct and rehabilitate 3,825 km national trunk roads.

45


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

% Reduction in per unit cost per km of tarmac road built

US$360,000 10 20 5095

Improvement in global competitive ranking in quality of roads

72 54 40 1796

% increase in the proportion of all-weather roads

16,714kms 20 40 100

Transport Accessibility of transport facilities97

Number of kilometers of railway lines built and completed

1919.2 2069.2 2619.2 4980

Improvement in global competitive ranking of available airline seat Kms /week

55 51 37 1898

Improvement in global competitive ranking of railroad infrastructure

72 55 46 1099

Improvement in global competitive ranking in quality of port infrastructure

91 61 43 20100

95 Cost of road construction ranges between US$ 14,200 – 18,320 per km depending on several factors, World Bank Report. 96 Korea Republic ranks number 17 in quality of roads in the Global Competitive Index (Malaysia 27, Namibia 35, Rwanda 40, South Africa 42 and China 54) 97 Indicators based on recommendations by World Bank and Global Competitiveness Index (World Economic Forum 2012-2013) 98 Korea Republic ranks 18 out of 144 in Global Competitiveness Index 2012-2013 (South Africa 24, Qatar 29, Chile 37 and Nigeria 51) 99 Korea Republic ranks number 10 out of 144 in Global Competitiveness Index 2012/13 (Switzerland 1, Malaysia 17, Namibia 39, South Africa 46 and Botswana 55) 100 Korea Republic ranks number 20 out of 144 in Global Competitiveness Index 2012/13 (Netherlands 1, Namibia 27, Seychelles 43, South Africa 52 and Zimbabwe 61)

46


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 Improvement in global competitive ranking of air transport infrastructure

65 50 39 15101

Transport Safety and Security

% reduction in number of deaths in maritime sector

29 28 20 100

Increase in number of search and rescue and navigation aid centers completed.

1 3 6 15

Affordability and Reliability of transport facilities

% increase in airport passenger clearance (Million)

N/A 20 45 102 58103

% increase in cargo handling capacity at the ports (tonnes)

21.9 million 15 75104 100

% Increase in cargo (tonnes) from Port transported through rail

1.1 million 20 50105 80

% increase in container handling capacity (in million TEU)

0.90 1.8 4.4 20.8106

101 South Africa ranks number 15 out of 144 in Global Competitiveness Index 2012/13 (Singapore 1, Malaysia 24, Korea 26, Chile 39 and Ethiopia 50) 102 Second MTP targets 45 million passengers. 103 Dubai was ranked 10 with 57.7 million passengers by Airports Council International 2012 (Dubai was able to increase by 21.2% between 2010 1 and 2012. Atlanta was

leading with 94.9 million followed by Beijing with 81.7 million). 104 Second MTP targets 50 million tonnes capacity. 105 Second MTP targets 25 million cargo freight by rail 106 Malaysia handled 20.8 million TEUs in 2012 (Netherlands – 12.1 million, South Africa – 4.4, Morocco – 1.8)

47


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Energy Easy access to energy

Total No. of customers connected to the national electricity grid

2,330,962 2,930,962 3,530.962 15 million

Access to electricity (% of population) 28 40 70 100107

Increase in flow rate of refined petroleum products (lt/hr)

830,000108 830,000 120,000 >120,000

Customer Satisfaction

Improvement in global competitive ranking in quality of electricity supply

102 94 52 32109

Time taken in obtaining an electrical connection (days)

60 30 21 3.9

% Reduction in system losses as a proportion energy purchased

18.6 17 15 15

Cost of energy per KWh (US$ Cents110) Domestic

19.78 17 10.43 7.5

107 South Africa had 84.7 (Botswana – 45.7 while Kuwait, United Arab Emirates and Singapore had 100% each) - World Bank, 2009-2013

108 From Mombasa to Nairobi( Replacement of The existing 14 inch pipeline by a 20 inch one)

109 Korea Republic ranks number 32 with 6.0 points in Global Competitive Index 2012-2013 (Namibia 52 – 5.4, Mauritius 66 – 5.0, South Africa 94 – 3.9, Kenya 102 – 3.6) 110 China has 7.5 to 10.7, Malaysia 7.09 to 14.78 while South Africa has 8 to 16 US cents per KWh: Global Electricity Price Comparison – Wikipedia.

48


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 Cost of energy per KWh (US$ Cents111) Industrial/Commercial

14.14 12.49 9 7.4

Enhanced level of energy generation

Total installed power generating capacity in Mega Watts(MW)

1765 2565 6000 18,000

% of electricity generated from renewable energy.

20 40 74 85

Total installed capacity of Geothermal power(MW)

273.7 700 1887 5000

Total installed capacity of Wind Energy (MW)

5.1 25 630 900

Total installed capacity of Coal power(MW)

0 0 1920 2400

111 China has 7.5 to 10.7, Malaysia 7.09 to 14.78 while South Africa has 8 to 16 US cents per KWh: Global Electricity Price Comparison – Wikipedia.

49


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 Number of days of strategic reserves for petroleum products

30 90 90 1 year

Information Communication and Technology

Increased internet, radio, television and telephone access and usage

% increase in Mobile telephone subscriptions per100 adult population

65

80

90

100112

% increase in Internet users/100 adult population113

40 57 70 100

% increase in Mobile Broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants114

2 4

10 25

112Seychelles is ranked 17 with 145.7, Malaysia 33 with 127.0, South Africa 35 with 126.8, China 117 with 73.2 while Kenya is 120 with 64.8: GCI 2012-2013.Te earlier indicator

was deleted to align the measure with the international accepted standard as provided for by ITU. Source of data- ITU YearBook of Statistics 2013. It is calculated but dividing

the number of mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions by the population and multiplying by 100. 113 Internet users refer to the proportion of individuals using the internet. Formula defined by ITU is - no. of Internet users = Ʃ (1MD+10TW+100FFOS) where MD is the

number of mobile data/internet subscriptions; TW is the terrestrial wireless subscriptions; and FFOS by 100 is fixed DSL, Fibre optic and satellite subscriptions

114A Broadband Internet subscriber is someone who pays for high-speed access to the public Internet (a TCP/IP connection). Highspeed access is defined as being equal to, or greater than 256 kbit/s, as the sum of the capacity in both directions. The statistic is measured irrespective of the type of access, or the type of device used to access the Internet, or the method of payment. A broadband Internet subscriber per 100 inhabitants is obtained by dividing the number of Broadband Internet subscribers by the population and multiplying by 100.

50


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030 % increase in TV population coverage115 58 58116 80 100

Improvement in Telecommunication Infrastructure Index117

N/A 0.16 0.3 0.87

Access to, and use of, ICT by households and individuals

% increase in Proportion of households with Internet access at home

N/A 33 75 100

% increase in Proportion of persons with Internet access at Work

N/A 20 50 100

Increased cyber security/safety

% increase in number of cyber-crimes detected and prevented.

N/A N/A <5 <50

% increase in number of cyber-crimes resolved against total cyber-crimes reported

N/A N/A <30 100%

115 Source: Ministry of Information and Communication Strategic Plan and CA Strategic Plan 116 Most newly industrialized countries are at 100% as they do not really on terrestrial broadcasting.

117UN E-government Survey 2014. Comprises subscription for fixed telephone, mobile cellular telephone, fixed broadband and wireless broadband. Morocco has 0.3 and Luxembourg 0.8.

51


SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Increase in E-government Services

% increase in e-government development index

N/A 0.38118 0.5 0.9

Increase in E-participation Index N/A 0.65119 0.8 0.9

Modernization of mass media equipment

%Increase in number of Multimedia cities120 N/A 5 10 70

Total number of 24hr digital stereo studios N/A 3 3 13

Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO)

% Contribution of ICT/BPO to GDP121 N/A 3.5 5 10

Number of jobs created in the BPO sector N/A 17,000 20,000 15,000,000

118UN E-government Survey 2014. Tunisia is at 0.53 , Brazil 0.6, Singapore 0.9

119 UN E-government Survey 2014 .E-participation index for Japan 0.96, Morocco 0.8, Singapore 0.9

120 Multimedia cities are centers with Video-conferencing facility and are the Multimedia University and the Kenya Mass Communication College in Kenya. They were also the

only public institutions offering studies in film technology

121 Source: First Medium Term Plan (2008-2012), Kenya Vision 2030

52

CHAPTER 5

SOCIAL PROTECTION, CULTURE AND RECREATION SECTOR

5.1 Introduction

The Social Protection, Culture and Recreation Sector comprises of two Sub – Sectors

which are; the Labour Social Security and Services, and the Sports, Culture and the Arts.

The sector plays a critical role in promotion of harmonious industrial relations, safety and

health at workplaces, employment promotion, industrial training, productivity

management, national human resource planning and development, social security,

children welfare, social development, promotion and exploitation of Kenya’s diverse

culture for peaceful co-existence, enhancing Kenya’s reading culture, promotion of sports

for a vibrant sporting industry and promotion and preservation of Kenya’s heritage for

national pride and harmony. The sector is also mandated to promote cultural and sports

tourism; development and of the film industry as well as advancement and preservation

of music in the country.


Vision

To have a productive workforce, just society, conserved heritage, and vibrant arts and

sports industry

Mission

To promote sustainable employment, productive workforce, empower the vulnerable

groups and nurture diverse heritage, arts and sports to enhance Kenya's regional and

international competiveness.

5.3 Strategic Objectives

i. To promote harmonious labour relations, social dialogue and fair labour

practices;

ii. To promote occupational safety and health culture;

iii. To develop, implement and review policies, legislation and programmes on

labour issues, children, persons with disabilities, older persons, and other

vulnerable groups;

iv. To provide policy guidance on national human resource planning, development

and utilization;

v. To provide relevant skills to industry;

vi. To promote productivity awareness, improvement and measurement;

53

vii. To ensure coordination and integration of national social protection programmes

for improved livelihoods;

viii. To harness, develop, preserve and promote sports, cultural heritage, and the

arts;

ix. To promote and accelerate access to library information services to all Kenyans;

x. To promote, preserve and maintain positive and diverse culture for national

identity, pride, integration and cohesion;

xi. To provide custody, preservation and access to public records and archives for

posterity;

xii. To promote growth, development and regulation of the local film industry; and

xiii. To promote research, indigenous knowledge/technologies, conservation and

sustainable utilization of national heritage.

5.4 Sub-Sector Mandates

5.4.1 Labour, Social Security and Services

i. Social security, assistance and protection policies and programmes; ii. National Employment policy and strategy for Kenya ; iii. Employment promotion iv. National human resource planning and development v. National productivity and competitiveness improvement vi. Child labour policy and regulations management vii. Labour and industrial relations policy viii. Internship and volunteers policies ix. Social and Community development x. Protection, rights and advocacy of needs of persons with disabilities xi. Work injury compensation xii. Promotion of occupational health and safety at work xiii. Management of labour migration and international jobs xiv. Management of vocational, apprenticeship and industrial training xv. Trade unions xvi. Family protection and matrimonial policies xvii. Policies on children welfare, protection and development

5.4.2 Sports, Culture and the Arts sub-Sector

i. Promotion and development of sports and sports facilities ii. Development and management of sports industry policy iii. Training of athletes and sports personnel iv. Expansion of the sports industry v. National Culture Promotion and Policy vi. National Heritage Policy and Management

54

vii. National Archives and Public Records management viii. Management of National Museums, and Monuments ix. Human Evolution, Botanical and Biomedical Research in the National Museums x. Development and promotion of diverse creative arts xi. Promotion and development of the Film Industry xii. Promotion of Library services xiii. Research and Conservation of Music xiv. Languages of Kenya Policy

5.5 Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies

5.5.1 Labour, Social Security Sub-Sector i. National Social Security Fund (NSSF) ii. National Industrial Training Authority (NITA) iii. National Council for Children Services (NCCS). iv. National Council for Persons with Disabilities (NCPWD) v. Child Welfare Society of Kenya (CWSK)

Proposed

i.National Productivity Council (Bill in Parliament) ii.The Conciliation and Mediation Commission (in the Budget and Bills prepared) iii.National Social Protection Council (in Parliament, Secretariat operational). iv.Occupational Safety, Health and Injury Compensation Authority (Bill at Attorney

General office) v.National Employment Authority (Draft Bill at Attorney General office)

5.5.2 Sports, Culture and Arts Sub-Sector

i. Kenya National Library Service (KNLS) ii. Sports Kenya. iii. The National Sports Fund. iv. The Kenya Academy of Sports. v. The Sports Disputes Tribunal. vi. Registrar of Sports. vii. Kenya Film Commission (KFC) viii. Kenya Film Classification Board ix. Kenya Cultural Centre (KCC) x. Natural Products Industry Co-ordination Board (Proposed)

55

5.5.3 Programmes

i. Promotion of Best Labour Practices; ii. Manpower Development, Employment and Productivity Management; iii. Social Development; iv. National Safety Net v. Sports vi. Culture and Arts vii. Children Services viii. Promotion of Library Services and Archives Management; ix. Policy, Planning and General Administrative services


i. Access to Employment and Capacity Utilization ii. Labour Relations and Productivity iii. Workplace Safety and Health Improvement iv. Improve livelihoods of vulnerable population (Children, Older persons and Persons

With Disabilities)

v. Social protection

vi. Social Security

vii. Promotion of sports

viii. Promote national heritage and culture ix. Enhanced national pride and harmony x. Effective and accessible public library services

56


SECTOR: SOCIAL PROTECTION,CULTUREAND RECREATION

SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Labour, Social Security and Services

Access to Employment & Capacity Utilization

National Unemployment 12.7122 9 8 <5

Enhancing Flexibility of Wage

5123 5.5 6.1 6.5

Reduction in Brain Drain of Talented People to other countries

3.7124 3.9 4.5 6.3

Country Capacity to retain talent125

3.9 4.1 4.5 >6.0

Capacity to attract talent126

3.8 4.1 4.6 >6.1

Female participation in labour force127

0.86 0.92 0.97 1.06

Labour Market Flexibility128 (Score)

7.52 (71.85)

7.59 (74.92)

7.87 (80.71)

8

122Provisional figures; Kenya National Bureau of Statistics: Kenya Population Census, 2009. Benchmarked against China 4.1 and India 4.9 123An indicator of 7 reflects the situation where it is the individual company that determine the workers’ pay (good environment for promoting competitiveness) and

1 is where pay is determined by a centralized bargaining process with Kenya at 5, Uganda 6.1, Singapore 6.0, Uruguay 2.3 and South Africa 3.0 (Source: World

Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey – 2011, 2012) 124Best practice is 7 where the country is able to retain its talented people (1 denoting a situation where the best and brightest people opt to leave to pursue

opportunities in other countries) with Kenya at 3.7, South Africa 3.5, Burundi 1.8, Switzerland 6.3 and Japan 5.7 (Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion

Survey – 2011, 2012) 125 WEF; 1= best & brightest leave to pursue opportunities in other countries, 7= best & brightest stay and pursue opportunities within the country. Kenya 3.9,

Brazil 4.1, Rwanda 4.3 and Qatar 6.0 126 WEF; 1= Not at all, 7= attracts best and brightest from around the world. Kenya 3.8, Liberia 4.1, Rwanda 4.6 and Switzerland 6.1 127 WEF; Ratio of women to men in labour force – Kenya 0.86, Liberia 0.92, Sierra Leone 0.97 and Malawi 1.06 128GTCR – Labour market flexibility – looks at how country allows market forces to determine wages and establish the conditions of hiring and firing,

57


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

% of Female Labour Employed in Non-Agricultural Sector as Percent of Total

34.5129 36 40 50

Youth Employment as % of Youth Population130 (Score)

32.8 34.1 41.5 74.4

Reliance on Professional Management131 (Score)

4.28 (56.64)

4.58 (59.65)

5.16 (69.31)

6.3 (100)

Labour Relations & Productivity

Improvement of Labour/Employer Relations

4.1132 4.8 5.4 6

% Increase of Reported Industrial Disputes Resolved

87133 89 92 100

and refrain from the use of conscription - 0 for worst 9.06 (100%) for best. 129Source: Economic Survey 2014; Computations 130 GTCR – Kenya 32.8 (33.76), Singapore 34.1 (35.35, Botswana 41.5 (47.61) and Tanzania 74.4 (100 best) 131WEF – Reliance on professional management - Opinion Survey (EOS) is conducted on an annual basis to gather information from business leaders on topics for

which hard data sources are scarce or non-existent. Kenya – 4.28, China – 4.55, India – 4.58, Brazil – 4.89, Botswana – 5.16, South Africa – 5.6, New Zealand –

6.3 132Labor-employer relations in a country are generally confrontational if they are at 1 and generally cooperative if at 7 with Kenya at 4.1, Switzerland 6.1, Malaysia

5.4, Spain 3.9 and South Africa 3.3 (Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey – 2011, 2012 ) 133Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Department of Labour – Labour Complaints Register (LD 64)

58


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Reduction in time taken to settle reported disputes

3 months134 2.5 months 2 months 14 days

Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes135

3.9 4.1 4.8 6.1

Cooperation in labour-employer136 relations

4.2 4.5 5.1 6.0

Flexibility of wage determination137

5.1 5.3 5.6 >6.2

Hiring and firing practices138

4.7 4.8 5.0 >5.8

Redundancy costs139 15.8 15.3 9.3 0

Reduction in days taken for attestation of foreign contracts

30140 15 10 2

Labour productivity per employee141

3,956 4,016 26,167 153,432

134Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Department of Labour – Labour Complaints Register (LD 64) 135 WEF; 1= Extremely inefficient, 7= extremely efficient. Kenya 3.9, Ghana 4.1, Zambia 4.4, Botswana 4.8 and Singapore 6.1. 136 WEF; 1= Generally confrontational, 7= Perfectly cooperative. Kenya 4.2, Senegal 4.5, Rwanda 4.9, The Gambia, 5.1 and Switzerland 6.0. 137 WEF; 1= by centralized bargaining process, 7= by individual company/organization. Kenya 5.1, Morocco 5.3, The Gambia 5.6 and Uganda 6.2. 138 WEF; 1= Heavily impeded by regulations, 7=extremely flexible. Kenya 4.7, Nigeria 4.8, Uganda 5.0, Hong Kong SAR 5.8. 139ACR; Kenya 15.8, Cameroon 15.3, Swaziland 14.6, Rwanda 13, Mauritius10.6, South Africa 9.3 and Denmark 0.0. 140Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Department of Labour – Attestation of Foreign Contracts (LD 21form) 141 WEF- Kenya 3956, Senegal 4016, S.Africa 26167, Trinidad & Tobago, Singapore 103399, Qatar 153432

59


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Effect of taxation on incentive to work142

3.5 3.7 4.3 >6.4

Relationship of pay to productivity143 (Score)

4.04 4.2 4.69 5.38

% Improvement of Labour Productivity Index

2.1144 2.3 2.9 5

% Improvement of Productivity practice and awareness

5145 12 20 >50

Workplace Safety &

And Health Improvement

% Increase of reported cases of occupational accidents and Ill-Health acted upon

59.9%146

(3906:6512)

60 62 70

142 ACR, WEF; Extent taxes reduce work. 1= significantly reduce incentives, 7= do not reduce incentives to work. Kenya 3.5, Swaziland 3.7, Gabon 4.3 and Qatar

6.4 143 GTCR – Extent of pay in relation to productivity (1 = not related and 7= strongly related) - Kenya 4.04 (50.72), Morocco 4.2 (53.31), China 4.69 (61.57),

Singapore 5.38 (73.01). 144Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Productivity Centre of Kenya(Kenya Productivity Statistic Report 2012)- Computation based on KNBS

figures 145Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Productivity Centre of Kenya - % Level of productivity practice and awareness across countries; Kenya

5% across the country, Japan 70%, Malaysia 50%, Botswana 20%, USA 80% (National Productivity Awareness Reports 2012) 146 1 international OSH performance indicators: ILO uses loss time injury and accident rates. These require Baseline surveys and an effective electronic data base

system. Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Directorate of Occupational Safety and Health services- DOSH 1 Form

60


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Increase in number of people trained in occupational safety and health

10,731

(54.6%) 17,000 25,000 100,000

Improve livelihoods of vulnerable population

Proportion of Orphans and Vulnerable Children accessing Cash Transfer

19.1147 26 37 100

% increase in number of children accessing care and protection services (in Statutory Children’s Institutions)

33148

(8,450)

43 (10,953)

60 (14,673)

100 (25,300)

Number of rescue centres for children in need of care and protection

4149 5 7 47

147Self-help groups, 10,644 women groups accessed development fund (Source: Women Enterprise Fund Annual Report 2012) 489 groups of Persons With Disability

(Source: National Council for Persons With Disability annual Report 2012) 148Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Department of Children Services, Annual Reports file 149Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Department of Children Services, Voluntary Children Officers file

61


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Proportion of elderly people under the Cash Transfer Programme

10.9150

60 85 100

Proportion of Persons With Severe Disability (PWD) under Cash Transfer Programme

7.4151 13.5 38.5

100

% increase in number of Persons With Disabilities with gainful employment

29.56152

(217,000) 40 (292,025)

50 (367,050)

80 (587,280)

Proportion of Persons With Disabilities accessing disability fund

3.4153 3.8 4.5

6.2

150According to 2009 population census there were 1,332,273 older persons aged 65 years and above. Out of these 540,000 translating to 40.6% require social

security to cope with basic human needs. In 2012 the programme covered 59,000 beneficiaries accounting for 10.9% of the vulnerable older people. Source:

MoLSS&S and KNBS; Kenya Population Census, 2009 151Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; Cash Transfer Programme database. There are approximately 200,000 persons with severe disability in

the country out of the existing 1.3 million PWDs 152The total number of Persons With Disabilities in Kenya aged between 15-64 is 734,000. 217,000 of these are engaged in gainful employment translating to

29.56% compared with 38.1% in the USA, 83.9% in China and 66% in Japan (Source: Report from Council on Developmental Disability, US 2011, Rights to Work?

A Comparative Look at China and Japan’s Labour Rights for Disabled Persons)

153Source: Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services; National Council for Persons With Disabilities

62


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Social protection

Social safety net as a percentage of GDP154

N/A 0.8 1.5

4.0

Social Security Proportion of total assets of social security pension schemes to GDP155

13.51%

14.06%

16%

36%

Proportion of eligible membership coverage 156

15.1%

18.7%

50%

100%

Sports, Culture and the Arts

Promotion of sports

Increase in number of sports stadia capacity per Million population

6710 8000 15000 35,000

% increase in uptake National Sports Fund

N/A 15% 20% 100%

% increase in youths accessing sports funds

N/A 15% 20% 70%

% increase in youths sponsored for national and international sports events

N/A 20% 30% 90%

154 Benchmarked against Brazil 2.49, Kenya 0.8, Eriteria 2.5, Gambia 1.0, Lesotho 4.6 Mauritius 4.4 Source “The state of social safety nets 2014” a world bank

publication 155Source National Social Security Fund Annual Report (2012) Total asset value of social security pension schemes in the country was KShs. 548 billion in 2012; in

year 2014, it was KShs. 633.5 billion which was contribution of 16 registered fund managers 156Source: Economic Survey: Active members in 2012 were 1.9 million out of 12.6 million eligible members which is(2.1 million in the formal sector and 10.5 million

in the informal sector) and in 2014, active membership was 2.5 million out of 13.4 million eligible members (2.2 million from the formal sector and 11.2 million in

the informal sector).Indonesia – 15%;

63


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Promote national heritage and culture

% Increase in number of research papers, media articles and books on heritage and culture

40% increase (about 700 by 2012 cumulatively157

85% 88% 90%

Increase in number of World Heritage Sites158

6

8 10 10

Enhanced national pride and harmony National pride

Increase in number of Cultural Exchange Programmes

30159 35 40 100

Increase in number of Audio Visual Records of music and dance heritage

200160 400 600 1,000

450161 700 900 1,000

157Source :NMK PC Report (2011-2012)

158UNESCO website and NMK Annual Report (2011-2012): These include Mount Kenya National Park and Natural forest, Fort Jesus, Old town Lamu, Kenya Lake system in the Great Rift Valley, the Sacred Mijikenda Kaya Forest and The Turkana National Park. Ethiopia 8, Egypt 7, Mali 10. Source : WEF report on ‘The travel

and Tourism competitive report 2013’

159Source: Ministry of National Heritage and Culture

160Source : Permanent Presidential Music Commission catalogues/data bank

161 Source : Permanent Presidential Music Commission catalogues/data bank

64


SUB-

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT

STATUS

2012

TARGET

2015

TARGET

2017

TARGET 2030

Increase number of youths trained on music and dance

Effective and accessible public library services

Increase in number of National Libraries established

57162 68 75 96

162 Source : KNLS

65

CHAPTER 6

EDUCATION SECTOR

6.1 Introduction

The Education Sector comprises the Ministry of Education Science and Technology

(MOEST), the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) and their affiliated Institutions. The

sector envisions “a globally competitive education, training, research and innovation

system for sustainable development”. To realize this, the Sector undertakes “to provide,

promote and coordinate quality education and training; integration of Science,

Technology and Innovation in sustainable socio- economic development processes.” The

sector’s overall goal is to increase access to education and training; improve quality and

relevance of education, reduce inequality as well as exploit knowledge and skills in

science, technology and innovation for global competitiveness. The sector undertook

policy, legal and regulatory reforms aimed at aligning the sector to the Constitution of

Kenya 2010 and Vision 2030 as well as international commitments like the Millennium

Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These reforms

have necessitated increased investment in order to expand access and equity in

education; improve quality, transition and relevance; and integrate science and

technology in the production sectors of the economy as well as addressing Human Capital

needs of the nation.


Vision

A globally competitive education, training, research and innovation system for sustainable

development

Mission

To provide, promote and coordinate the delivery of quality education, training and

research and enhance integration of Science, Technology and Innovation into national

production systems for sustainable development.

6.3 Strategic Goals and Objectives of the Sector

The overall sector goal is to increase access to education, raise the quality and relevance

of education, and ensure equity as well as to exploit knowledge in science, technology

and innovation for global competitiveness. The Sector goal also includes provision of

adequate teaching services and improvement of performance and professional conduct

66

of teachers for increased learning outcomes in public educational institutions. The

following are the strategic goals and objectives of the sector.

i. Curriculum review and reform

ii. Access, equity, and quality and governance in the education and training sector

iii. Revitalizing of Technical Vocational Education and Training.

iv. Harnessing Science, Technology and Innovation

v. Developing a Highly Skilled Human Resource Base

vi. Intensification of Innovation in Priority Sectors

vii. Enhancing Science, Technology and Innovation Awareness

viii. Strengthening the ST&I Performance Management Framework

ix. Enhanced ST&I infrastructure

x. Increased funding for Research and Development

xi. Developed Human Resource Capacity in Science, Technology and Innovation

(STI)

xii. Increased innovations

xiii. To provide access to quality education and training at all levels

xiv. To establish, maintain and manage professional teaching service for all public

primary, secondary and tertiary institutions.

xv. To formulate, review and implement appropriate policies, legal and institutional

frameworks for the Sector

xvi. To create new knowledge and technologies

xvii. To promote and coordinate the development of Science and Technology

6.3.1 Strategic Objectives of Education Sector

The following are the broad strategic objectives under the sector:

i. To enhance access, equity and quality of education and training at all levels

ii. To promote and integrate Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and Information and

Communication Technology (ICT) in Curriculum delivery and at all levels of

education and training

iii. To strengthen linkages between higher education and training institutions with

communities and industry

iv. To promote and integrate research, science, technology and innovation at all levels

v. To provide sufficient teaching service for all public institutions and achieve equitable

and optimal utilization of teachers in the country

67

vi. To undertake quality assurance and review standards of education and training for

the teaching service

vii. To improve the management capacities of education managers and other personnel

involved in education and training at all levels.

viii. To coordinate quality assurance and review standards of education and training at

all levels.

ix. To provide and maintain a sufficient teaching force in public primary and secondary

and tertiary institutions

x. To enhance quality teaching, professionalism and integrity in all public educational

institutions

6.4 Sub Sectors

i. State Department of Education ii. State Department of Science and Technology

6.5 Commission

i. The Teachers Service Commission

6.6 Sagas in the Sector

i. Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD)

ii. Kenya National Examination Council (KNEC)

iii. Kenya Education Management Institute (KEMI)

iv. Institute for Capacity Development of Teachers in Africa

v. Kenya Institute of Special Education (KISE)

vi. Jomo Kenyatta Foundation (JKF)

vii. Kenya Literature Bureau (KLB)

viii. Kenya Institute of Special Education (KISE)

ix. KNATCOM for UNESCO

x. Commission for University Education (CUE)

xi. Higher Education Loans Board (HELB)

xii. National Commission for Science Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI)

xiii. Technical & Vocational Education Training Authority (TVETA)

xiv. Kenya Universities &Colleges Central Placement Service (KUCCPS)

xv. National Research Fund (NRF)

xvi. Universities and Tertiary Institutions

68

6.7 Key result areas

i. Access to education

ii. Quality of education

iii. Equity- Access to Education by Regions &Gender

iv. A culture of scientific innovation

v. Vibrant Technical Industrial Vocational Entrepreneurship Training (TIVET) vi. Global competitiveness of Higher Education vii. Higher Education viii. Enhanced Technology Development (Capacity for Innovation)

69


SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Education

Access to Education

Improved rating on education index163

.690 .731 .811 >.850

% Increase of NER in ECDE164

53.5 55 60 >80.0

Increase in proportion of Expenditure on Education as a % of government expenditure165

17.2 18.3 19.2 20

Public spending on education, total (% of GDP)166

6.7 7.3 8.1 12.8

Expenditure per a primary school pupil (% of GDP per capita)167

N/A 11.4 17.8 20.2

163Malaysia.851,Gabon.843,South Africa.843,Mauritius.839,Jamaica.834,Swaziland.731,Namibia.811,Kenya.690(Source:UNDP’s Human Development Report, 2013) 164Ireland at 82% (male-82%,female 81%);South Africa 51% (male 50%,female 51%);Kenya 48% (male 49%,female47%);Malaysia 47% (male 48% ,female 46%);Indonesia 44% (male 43%,female 45%); Mexico 114% (male 114%,female 114%); Philippines 46%(male 46%,female 47%); Chile 56% (male 55%,female 57%) ; Mauritius99% (male 98%, female 100%); Ghana 60% (male 59%,female 62%) (Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2014)

165Indonesia at 15.2%;Greece at 7.0%; Finland at 12.3%; Tunisia at 21.5%; Singapore at 22.7%; Philippines at 15.0%; Malaysia at 21.3%; Mauritius at 13.7%; South Africa at 19.2%;Ireland a t13.3%, Cuba18.3%, Australia 13.5%,USA13.1%(Source: UNESCO EFA Global Monitoring Report ,2013/4) 166Indonesia at 3.6%; Ghana a t8.1%; Finland a t6.8%; Tunisia at 6.2%; Singapore a t3.0%; Malaysia at 5.9%; Mauritius a t3.5%; South Africa at 6.6%;Ireland at 6.2%, Cuba 12.8%, Australia 5.1%,USA5.4%; Cyprus 7.3%(Source: World Bank – World Development Indicators,2013) 167Indonesia at 11.9%;Ghana at 11.4%; Finland at 21.1%; Singapore at 11.2%; Malaysia at 17.1% ;Mauritius at 10.5%; South Africa at 17.8%;Ireland at

70

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Expenditure per secondary168 school student (% of GDP per capita)

N/A 17.0 20.1 26.1

Expenditure per Tertiary Institution student, (% of GDP per capita)169

N/A 20.0 24.2 38.3

% increase of NER in primary schools170

95.5 97.7 98.4 99.0

% increase of NER in Secondary schools171

39.5 45.8 46.4 >50.0

% increase in the Transition Rate from Primary to Secondary172

77.4 78.0 79.2 >80.0

19.7%, Cuba 49.3%, Australia 20.2%,USA 22.1%; Cyprus 34.1% (Source: World Bank – World Development Indicators,2013) 168Indonesia at 10.7%;Ghana at 26.1%;Finland at 36.2%; Singapore at 17.0%; Malaysia at 19.9% ;Mauritius at 19.0%; South Africa at 20.1%; Ireland at

28.9%, Cuba52.1%, Australia 18.0%,USA24.3%; Cyprus 40.7% (Source: World Bank – World Development Indicators,2013)

169Indonesia at 24.2%;Finland at 37.8%; Singapore at 23.4%; Malaysia at 60.9%; Mauritius at 8.8; Ireland at 31.2%, Cuba 63.0%, Australia 20.0%,USA20.9%;

Cyprus 38.3%(Source: World Bank – World Development Indicators,2013) 170Mauritius 97.4%; Rwanda 98.4% (Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2014) 171Seychelles 95.2%; Guatemala 46.4%; Bangladesh 45.8%; Lao PDR 38.7%; Timor-Leste 37.7%; Swaziland 34.9%(Source: UNESCO Institutefor Statistics,2014) 172World average 88.0%; Maur i t ius 78.0%; Togo 79.2%;Developing Countries 86.3%; Lower income Countries 79.8%; Togo 79.2%; Finland99.9%; Africa average 76%; Eritrea 98.2%; Botswana 96.4%; Malaysia 99%; Malawi 86.2%; Algeria 97.1% (Source: UNESCO Institutefor Statistics, 2014)

71

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

% increase in Transition Rate from Secondary to University

8.3 15.3 19.9 50.0

Quality of Education

Improvement in Adult Literacy Rate (% in ages 15 & older)173

87.4 88.7 89.6 >80

Improvement of Quality rating in primary education174

3.6 4.2 4.6 >6

% Improvement in Secondary Survival Rate175

90 93.3 97.5 100

Improvement of Pupil per Teacher Ratio (PTR) in primary schools176

47:1 33.9:1 31.7:1 25:1

173Cuba’s adult literacy rate at 99.8%,Georgia 99.7%, Myanmar 92.3%, Lesotho 89.6%, South Africa 88.7%, Kenya 87.4%, Uganda 73.2%.

(Source:UNDP’sHumanDevelopmentReport,2013) 174A rating of 7 (best in the world) denotes excellent and 1 poor. Kenya’s score 3.6, Rwanda 3.9, Botswana 4.2, Gambia 4.6, Malaysia 4.9,Singapore 6.1, Finland 6.8 (World Economic Forum: Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013) 175 Iceland 99.5%, Seychelles 98.0%, Mauritius 97.5%, Zambia 97.3%, Botswana 96.9%, Gambia 93.3%, Kenya 89.6%. (Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics,

2014) 176Finland at 13.6;Ghana at 31.7; Malaysia at 12.5;Mauritius at 20.9;Ireland at 16.1;China at 18.2; Global average at 20.6; Africa 27.0; Sub-Saharan Africa 27.9; Djibouti 34.2; Eritrea 40.9; Gambia 33.9.(Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics,2014).

72

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Improvement of Student per Teacher Ratio (PTR) in secondary schools177

29.7:1 21.4:1 17.8:1 15:1

Improvement of Quality of education (rating) in meeting needs of a competitive economy178

4.3 4.6 5.1 >5.5

% Improvement in Primary school Completion Rate (PCR)179

80.5

86.7

93.6

100

Equity- Access to

Education by Regions &Gender

% Increase of NER in Northern Kenya

40.3 50 60 100.0

Improvement of Gender Parity

Literacy (Female

literacy rate/male literacy rate)

0.98 1 1 1

177 Burundi 19.7; Burkina Faso 26.3; China 14.5; Finland 12.8; Cuba 8.4; Cameroon 21.4; Kenya 29.7; (Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics 2014) 178A rating of 7 denotes’ very well’and1’not well at all ’with Kenya’s score a t4.3, India 4.4, UK4.7, USA4.7, Gambia 4.6, Malaysia5.1, Ireland 5.3, Singapore5.8,

Switzerland 6.0, Finland 5.8. (Source: World Economic Forum: Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014) 179Ghana at 98.9%; Indonesia 97.2%; Morocco 93.6%; Guyana 86.7%; Mauritius 83.8%; Namibia 81.3% .(Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2014)

73

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Improvement of Gender Parity Index (Female NER/Male NER) in primary school

1.01 1 1 1

Improvement of Gender Parity Index (Female NER/Male NER) in secondary school

1.01 1 1 1

% Increase of male NER in primary schools

95 97 100 100

% Increase of female NER in primary schools

95.7 97 100 100

% Increase of male NER in secondary schools

39.6 55 85 100

% Increase of female NER in secondary schools

39.8 45 60 >75

% Increase of Male

Secondary Survival Rate

50 95.8 98.6 99

% Increase of Female Secondary Survival Rate

N/A 93.8 97.9 99

74

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Higher Education, Science and Technology

A culture of Scientific Innovation

Increase in number of Science parks180

3181 3 4 5

Increase in research fund as a % of GDP182

0.56 0.98 1.5 2

Increase in availability of Scientists and Engineers index183

4.1 4.8 5.5 5.9

% Increase in number of patents filed per million population184

0.1 0.6 6.2 >50

% Increase in number of institutional researchers

7,000 20 40 70

180Science Parks: Malaysia 3,South Korea11;Source International Association of Science Parks (IASP), Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology is registered with IASP as an affiliate member 181MMUST, UoN, KU (incubation centre) 182 %of GDP for Research & Development: Korea 4.0%; Israel 3.9%; Finland 3.6%; Austria 2.84%; Brazil 1.21%; Malaysia 1.1%; South Africa 0.76%; Kenya 0.98%

(Source: World Bank Development Indicators, 2014) 183Availability of Scientists and Engineers (1 = not at all; 7 = widely available): Finland 6.3; Puerto Rico 5.6; Singapore 5.0; Malaysia 4.9; Tunisia 4.8; Morocco 4.5;

Cameroon 4.4; Kenya 4.3. (Source: World Economic Forum: Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014) 184Sweden 302.7; Korea 183.4; Singapore 124.4; South Africa 6.2; Malaysia 12.1; Morocco 0.6; Kenya 0.1. (Source: World Economic Forum -Global Competitiveness

Report 2013-2014)

75

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

% Increase in number of scientific publications per million population185

7.25186 17% 30% 70%

Vibrant Technical Industrial Vocational Entrepreneurship Training (TIVET)

Increase in enrolment of students for TIVET per year

76,000 86,000 93,000 137,000

Global competitiveness of Higher Education

% Increase in number of Accredited Universities

22 35 44 100

Improvement in the Web metrics ranking of World Universities

1,435 Top1,000 Top

800 Top500

185US had 900 scientific publications per Million Population (2000)–CORDIS, South Africa 72 and Kenya 17 scientific articles per million inhabitants(1998),UNESCO Science Report 2005 186http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IP.JRN.ARTC.SC

76

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

% Increase in number of university students accessing Government loans187

49% 50% 60% 100%

Increase in the successful linkages between Universities, and Industry Index188

4.3 4.5 5.0 7.0

Research and Development

Enhanced

Technology Development (Capacity for Innovation)

Increase in Quality of Research institutions Index189

4.0 4.5 4.9 6.0

Increase in company spending on R&D Index190

4.0 4.6 5.0 6.0

187 Higher Education Loans Board Strategic Plan 2012-2018 (the figure include students in TVET). 188Index a measure of the extent to which businesses and universities collaborate on research and development(1=do not collaborate at all;

7=collaborateextensively)Index:Switzerland5.8,Singapore5.6,Malaysia5.0,SouthAfrica 4.5,Kenya 4.3. (Source: World Economic Forum -Global Competitiveness

Report 2013-2014) 189Index assesses the quality of scientific research institutions;(1 = extremely poor - among the worst in the world; 7 = extremely good - among the best in the

world): Israel 6.4; Singapore 5.6; Austria 5.0; Malaysia 4.9; South Africa 4.8; India 4.5; Kenya 4.0. (Source: World Economic Forum -Global Competitiveness Report

2013-2014) 190 Index assesses extent to which companies spend on research and development (R&D)? [1 = do not spend on R&D; 7 = spend heavily on R&D]: Switzerland 6.0; Singapore 5.0; Malaysia 4.6; Kenya 4.0. (Source: World Economic Forum -Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014)

77

SECTOR: EDUCATION

SUB-

SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

STATUS

2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Increase in the Capacity for Innovation Index191

4.1 4.4 4.9 6.0

191 Index assesses extent to which companies have the capacity to innovate. (1 = not at all; 7 = to a great extent): Switzerland 5.8; Malaysia 4.9; Indonesia 4.4; South Africa 4.1; Kenya 4.1. (Source: World Economic Forum -Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014)

78

CHAPTER 7

HEALTH SECTOR

7.1 Introduction

The Overall goal of the health sector is to provide equitable, affordable and quality

healthcare to all citizens. The Constitution, through the chapter on Bill of Rights, puts a

heavy responsibility on the health sector to ensure that the right to health is realized. The

provisions of this Bill, especially the right to life and the right to the highest attainable

standard of health, including reproductive health and emergency treatment, have also

raised the expectations of the citizens regarding healthcare.

Health sector is one of the key areas in the Social Pillar that aims at building a just and

cohesive society that enjoys equitable social development in a clean and secure

environment. A healthy nation is critical for economic development, and poverty

reduction. In this regard, a sector-specific plan is essential in spelling out the specific

issues that the sector will address and which priority programmes will be implemented

with focused attention.

The Constitution of Kenya devolved the responsibility of delivering essential health

services to the Counties while at the National level Ministry of Health will provide policy

support and technical guidance. With changes in roles and responsibilities, it is envisaged

that health service delivery will improve.


Vision

A healthy and globally competitive nation

Mission

To deliberately build progressive, responsive and sustainable technologically-driven,

evidence-based and client-centered health system for accelerated attainment of the

highest standard of health to all Kenyans

79

7.3 Strategic Objectives

The Sessional Paper No.6 of Kenya Health Policy (2014 – 2030) has six policy objectives and eight strategic measures, which provide a framework for the attainment of the highest standard of health in a manner responsive to the needs of the Kenya population envisioned in Vision 2030’s goal for the health sector. The six policy objectives are:

i. Eliminate communicable conditions;

ii. Halt and reverse the burden of non-communicable conditions;

iii. Reduce the burden of violence and injuries;

iv. Provide essential healthcare;

v. Minimize exposure to health risk factors; and

vi. Strengthen collaboration with private and other health related sector providers.

7.4 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs)

There are eight Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs) under the Ministry

of Health which complement it in discharging its core functions through specialized

health service delivery; medical research and training; procurement and distribution

of drugs; and financing through health insurance.

These SAGAs are:

i. The Kenyatta National Hospital;

ii. Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital;

iii. Kenya Medical Training College;

iv. Kenya Medical Supplies Agency,

v. Kenya Medical Research Institute,

vi. National Hospital Insurance Fund; and

vii. National AIDS Control Council


i. Promotive and preventive health care

ii. Access to Quality and Affordable Health care

80


SECTOR : HEALTH

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Health Promotive and Preventive health care services

Infant Mortality per

1000Live-births192

52193 35 20 8

Under five Mortality per 1000 live births194

74195 50 35 16

Maternal Mortality per 100,000 Live-births196

488197 300 140 29

Prevalence of undernourished population198

26 23 20 <5

% Reduction in Malaria Prevalence in the total population annually199

9200 8

7 <5

192 Infant Mortality Rate( under 1 year per 1000 live Births) in 2012: Cuba was 4, USA was 6, Malaysia was 7, Chile was 8, China was 12, Mexico was 14, Uganda was 45, Tanzania was 38, Ethiopia was 47( source WHO World Health Statistics) 193 Source: Ministry of Health, KDHS 2008/09. Current KDHS, is on going 194Under five refer to between 1st and 5th birthday. According to WHO health statistics 2012, under-five mortality rate per 1000 live births, Malaysia was at 9, Mexico

16, Sweden 3, USA 7, Rwanda 55, Uganda 69, and Tanzania 54. 195 Source: Ministry of Health 196 Maternal Mortality rate per 100,000 live births as at 2013 in Malaysia was 29, Mexico was 49, USA was 28, South Africa was 140, Rwanda was 320, Uganda was 360. (Source WHO World Health Statistics) 197 Source: Ministry of Health KDHS 2008/09. Currently KDHS, is on going 198 Source World Bank. In 2013 the % of population undernourished in Algeria , Chile, Cuba, Egypt, Ghana, Malaysia and more other countries were at 5% 199 Source WHO: Mexico 1,000, Mauritania 670,000, Malaysia 3,801, South Africa: 17,000 200 Source: WHO, Ministry of Health

81

SECTOR : HEALTH

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Reduction in HIV/AIDS Prevalence Rate201

6.3202 5.2 4.5 <0.5

Reduction in Water-borne

and sanitation related diseases per 100,000 population203

60 26 13 <10

Increase in TB treatment cure rate204

81205 84 90 100

Reduction in incidence of TB (per 100,000 population)206

272207 200 150 <100

Increase in the percentage level of Food Safety208

80209 90 100 100

% Reduction in risk of death

from Non-Communicable

N/A 20 50 80

201 At 2012 the prevalence rate was: Mauritania and Malaysia < 0.6, china 0.1 while Phillipines and Sri-lanka was <0.1 Source: UNAIDS Global report 2013 202 Source: Ministry of Health 203 WHO, Chile and Mauritius 1, Cuba 2, China, Mexico and Malaysia 4, South Africa 26, Egypt 13, Tunisia 8 204 WHO: Sweden 94%, Singapore and Benin at 100% 205Data as at 2014. Source: Ministry of Health, HIS 206 Monaco 2, Switzerland and Netherlands 6, Spain 14, Mexico 23, Rwanda 86, Tanzania 165 and Uganda 179 207 Source WHO 208Food safety with reference to International Health regulation which includes a set of indicators on legislation. Laboratories, zoonosis, preparedness among others. Refer to WHO website 209 According to WHO percentage level on compliance with International Health Regulations on food safety : China, Denmark, Malaysia, France, Netherlands, Singapore and more other countries were at 100% in 2013

82

SECTOR : HEALTH

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Diseases per 100,000

population210

Improvement in life expectancy(yrs)211

60212 62 65 80

Access to Quality& Affordable Health Care

% increase in the level of access to basic health and related services213

57 214 60 70 100

% increase in access to specialized health care in management of lifestyle diseases (Renal, Cancer, Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases215)

5216 15 30 100

210 Source WHO, Risk of death from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases in 2008: France, 322, South Africa 645, Tunisia 455 211 Source WHO Argentina 76, Ghana 62, Chile 80, Ethiopia 64,

212 Source: Ministry of Health 213 Includes indicators on: No. of well-equipped health facilities/ 5kms square radius, No. of specialized diagnostic and laboratory services, No. of patients attending health facilities among other indicators. 214Access rate as at 2014. Source: Ministry of Health SARAM (Service Availability and Readiness Assessment Mapping, report) 215 Cholesterol, blood pressure, heart attacks among others 216Access rate as at 2014. Source: Ministry of Health, SARAM (Service Availability and Readiness Assessment Mapping, report). 2 facilities (KNH, MTRH) were already giving specialized care. Work on the establishment of cancer centre ongoing at MTRH.

83

SECTOR : HEALTH

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Out of pocket expenditure as a percentage of private expenditure on health217

76.9218 70 60 <20

Increase of Doctors (Number) per 10,000 population219

1.7220 26 32 70

Increase of Nurses (Number) Per10,000 population221

15.3222 22.9 33.3 >228

% net increase in Medical tourism

N/A 5% 30%223 50%

Increase in proportion of health expenditure as % of GDP224

5.4225 5.6 7 10

217 South Africa : 13.8, Uganda: 64.8,Tanzania: 52.3, USA: 20.7, Botswana: 12.7, Australia: 62.2, Mozambique:9.6 Source WHO Health statistics 218 Source: WHO health statistics. 219 WHO recommendation is 230 doctors per 100,000; Cuba at 672( 2010), USA at 245(2011); China at 146; Malaysia at 120(2010); South Africa at 77(2013) 220 Source Ministry of Health ,Health Human resource strategy 221 Nurses and Midwifery personnel per 100,000 population in USA in 2012 was 245, Mexico in 2011 was 201, Egypt in 2009 was 352; Qatar in 2010 was 774; Brazil in 2013 was 760; Cuba in 2010 was 905. WHO recommendation is 228 Nurses per 10,000. ( Source: WHO, World Health Statistics) 222 Source: Ministry of Health, Health Human resource strategy 223This is a new field and there is no existing data from other countries to benchmark with. Research is recommended in this area. However, with the set plans on

rehabilitation of existing medical services to have at least one referral hospital in every county and other measures as planned in the MTP II, this percentage might

go up to more than 30%

224Mexico 6.2(2012); Chile 7.2(2012) Mexico 6.2(2012): Source WHO 225 Source: Ministry of health

84

SECTOR : HEALTH

SUB-SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS 2012

Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

% Increased research on vaccines and other disease prevention measures for humans226

10 43 50 >70

Improvement on HDI Rating(UNDP)

0.677227 0.7 0.75 0.75

Increase in % of customer satisfaction

70228 78 85 >80

Improvement in Kenya’s ranking on Global Competitiveness scoreboard on Health229

118/148 90/148 65/148 Top 50

226 KEMRI has developed vaccines for Polio, Hepatitis, Measles, Yellow Fever, Influenza, Chicken pox Meningitis, Rabies, Cholera, and Typhoid. HIV-AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria vaccines are being considered among other diseases. 227 Source: UNDP 228 Source: Ministry of Health 229The scoreboard includes health and education which are twinned. Where by improved educations has also a bearing to health and vice versa.

85

CHAPTER 8

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS SECTOR

8.1 Introduction

The Public Administration and International Relations sector plays an important role and

cuts across the entire government. It focuses on provision of overall Policy and leadership

direction on matters pertaining to management of Government, Legislation, planning,

financing and public human resource management. It also has greater linkages with all

other sectors of the economy.


Vision

Excellence in public policy management, resource mobilization, governance and foreign

relations for national transformation

Mission

To provide overall leadership and oversight in the management of the economy, resource

mobilization, implementation of devolution and foreign relations for effective public

service delivery

8.3 Strategic goals/Objectives of the Sector

The sector has been and continues to pursue the following strategic objectives:

i. Provide overall policy and strategic direction for the socio-economic and political

transformation of the country

ii. Enhance coordination and implementation of devolution for equitable development

iii. Promote empowerment of youth, women and the vulnerable groups

iv. Promote and articulate Kenya’s foreign policy for national development

v. Ensure prudent financial management for macroeconomic stability

vi. Enhance economic policy management for national development

vii. Ensure prudent governance and accountability at all levels of Government

viii. Facilitate the implementation of the constitution for national transformation

ix. Attract, retain and develop competent human resource in the public service for

efficient and effective service delivery

x. Improve accountability in the management of public resources

xi. Ensure provision of efficient and effective public service delivery for enhanced

86

national competitiveness.

8.4 Sub-Sectors

The Public Administration and International Relations sector comprises of the following

sub-sectors:

i. The Presidency

ii. Ministry of Devolution and Planning

iii. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade

iv. The National Treasury

Commissions and Independent offices

i. Parliamentary Service Commission

ii. Commission on Revenue Allocation

iii. Public Service Commission

iv. Salaries and Remuneration Commission

v. Auditor General

vi. Controller of Budget

vii. Commission on Administrative Justice


i. The Presidency

Lamu Port South Sudan Ethiopia Transit Corridor Development

Authority (LAPSSET)

ii. Ministry of Devolution and Planning

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS

Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA)

National Council for Population and Development (NCPD)

Community Development Trust Fund ( CDTF)

New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD

Constituencies Development Fund Board

Vision 2030 Delivery Secretariat

Transition Authority

87

Kenya School of Government

Kenya Development Learning Centre

Women Enterprise Fund

Youth Enterprise Fund

Uwezo Fund

National Drought Management Authority

National Youth Council

NGO Co-ordination Board

iii. The National Treasury

Central Bank of Kenya

Kenya Institute of Supplies Management

Public Procurement Oversight Authority

Kenya Revenue Authority

Insurance Regulatory Authority

Capital Markets Authority

Retirement Benefits Authority

Privatization Commission

Public Sector Accounting Standards Board

Competition Authority

Kenya Trade Network Agency


i. Quality Leadership

ii. Good governance and accountability in the public service

iii. Evidence-based and effective policy and planning system

iv. Improved Trade and Investment

v. Promoting and safeguarding Kenya’s national interest abroad

vi. Efficient capacity for coordinating implementing, monitoring and evaluation of

Vision 2030

vii. Productivity and improved welfare of Public Servants

viii. Youth development and empowerment

ix. Enhanced standards of Living of communities in Arid Areas

x. Women empowerment and gender equity

xi. Stable Macroeconomic Environment

xii. Effective mobilization and management of public resources

xiii. Competitiveness in finance and Investment Market

88


SECTOR: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

SUB- SECTOR KEY RESULT AREAS


STATUS

2012 PERFORMANCE TARGETS

2015 2017 2030

The Presidency

Quality Leadership

% of Kenyans satisfied with the government Performance

63.5 (2009)

65

70 85

Improved corruption perception Index230

27 43 65 85

% increase in economic growth231

4.6 7.8 10 10

% reduction in number of Kenyans living below the poverty line232

45.2 40 35 <9

Increase in GDP per capita (USD) of Kenyans233

1246 1300 1400 4,000

Reduction in unemployment rate

12.7 11 10 <5

Improved efficiency score in provision of necessary public goods and

3.1 3.7 4.4 6.0

230 perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 - 100, where 0 means that a country is perceived as highly corrupt and 100 means it is perceived as

very clean. Denmark rank 1st with a score of 90, Botswana 65, Namibia 48, South Africa 43. Kenya Scored 27. (Source: Transparency International, 2012) 231Kenya Economic Survey 2013. The Target for 2017 is 10.1 percent sustained over the Kenya Vision 2030 plan period 232 Kenya Economic Survey 2013- based on small area estimation 2009. Kenya Vision 2030 targets reduction of poverty to between 30-35% 233WEF 2012-2013. Gabon , Botswana, Mauritius and South Africa ranks top in Africa with USD 10,654, USD 9,481, USD 8,777,and USD 8,066 respectively. Kenya

Vision 2030 targets middle income status by 2030 with per capita of over USD 3,000. Chad USD 892, Senegal USD 1076.

89

Sector Performance Standards 2015




STATUS


2015 2017 2030

services234

Improved transparency score in government policymaking235

3.8 4.2 4.8 5.2

Improved level of Kenya’s Human Development Index236

0.52 0.63 0.70 0.92

Good governance and Accountability in the

Improved level of Governance237

39 56 61 75

Improved score in reduced favoritism in decisions of

2.5 4.0 4.5 >5

234 Rate the composition of public spending in your country? [1 = extremely wasteful; 7 = highly efficient in providing necessary goods and services. Singapore

leads globally with score 6.0, Rwanda ranks 1st in Africa with 5.5, Tha Gambia 4.7,Botswana 4.4, China and Mauritius 3.7 235 Measure how easy is it for businesses in a country to obtain information about changes in government policies and regulations affecting their activities. Singapore

ranks 1st with score 6.3, Malaysia 5.2, South Africa 4.8, China 4.5, Cameroon 4.2. Source WEF report 2013-14. 236World Development Indicators, 2012. Norway ranks 1st with 0.955, China 0.69, Gabon 0.683, Egypt 0.662, South Africa 0.63Ghana 0.558 237World Governance indicators 2013. Percentile rank among all countries ranges from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). Mauritius 73, South Africa 65, Brazil61, India

58, Senegal 56, Tanzania 42

90





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

public service

Government officers238

Improvement in government spending for efficient provision of goods and services239

3.1 3.9 4.4 5.5

Ministry of Foreign

Affairs and International Trade

Promoting and safeguarding Kenya’s national

interest abroad

% increase in accessibility of foreign mission services

N/A 80 80 90

Improved Trade

Improved global ranking on trading across boarders240

156 130 Top 100 Top 50

% growth in share of 15.2241 18 25 50

238WEF, 2012-2013. Accesses extend government officials show favoritism to well-connected firms and individuals when deciding upon policies and contracts? [1 =

always show favoritism; 7 = never show favoritism] .New Zealand 5.4, Gambia 4.5, Malaysia and Botswana 4.1 239WEF 2012/13.composition of public spending [1 = extremely wasteful; 7 = highly efficient in providing necessary goods and services. Rwanda is 4th globally

with 5.5, Malaysia 4.4, Ethiopia 3.9 240Doing business Report 2013. Tunisia ranks 31, Senegal 80, Ghana 109, South Africa 106, Brazil 124, India 132 and Tanzania 139 241Economic Survey 2013. Brazil 13%, China 27%, South Africa 30%

91





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

and Investment

exports to GDP

Ministry of Devolution and Planning

Evidence-based and effective policy and

planning system

Improved transparency score in government policymaking242

3.8 4.2 4.8 5.2

Efficient capacity for coordinating,

implementing, monitoring and evaluation of Vision 2030

Improved ranking on the Global Competitiveness index

106 Top 70 Top 50 Top 30

242WEF 2012.Measure how easy is it for businesses in a country to obtain information about changes in government policies and regulations affecting their activities.

Singapore ranks 1st with score 6.3, Malaysia 5.2, South Africa 4.8, China 4.5, Cameroon 4.2

92





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

Productivity and improved

welfare of Public servants

Improvement in the extent to which remuneration is related to productivity243

4.0 4.4 4.7 5.3

Improvement in retention and attraction of talented people244

3.4

3.8 4.8 >5.5

243WEF 2012, Kenya ranks 59th with score of 4.0, morocco 4.2, Indonesia 4.4, China 4.7 and Malaysia 5.3 244Measures how country retain and attract talented people, [1 = no, the best and brightest normally leave to pursue opportunities in other countries; 7 = yes, there

are many opportunities for talented people within the country] Switzerland ranks 1st with score of 6.3, USA 5.6, Rwanda 4.8 ,South Africa and Botswana 3.8 (WEF,

2012-13)

93





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

Youth development and empowerment

% of funding for youth programmes as a percentage of the GDP

N/A 1 3 5

% reduction in youth unemployment

N/A 10 30 100

% increase in number of youths graduating from NYS

18,500 15 30 50

Increase Youth Development Index (YDI) measure245

0.417 0.5 0.64 0.745

% increase in number of youth /youth groups/enterprises accessing 30% public procurement opportunities 246

N/A 30 60 100

245YDI examines youth development under five indicator headings: health, education, employment, civic participation, and political participation. Singapore score

0.745, Malaysia 0.699, Brazil 0.642, Ghana 0.598, south Africa 0.580. Common Wealth Youth development Index 2013.

246Implementation of this policy began in 2013/14.

94





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

Enhanced standards of Living of communities in Arid areas

% increase in persons accessing water and sanitation services in ASAL

2M

50

75

100

% Increase in persons accessing health services

2.3M 50 75 100

% Reduction in persons accessing drought contingency fund

2M 25 75 100

Women empowerment and gender equity

Improvement in gender inequality index247

0.62 0.5 0.4 0.2

% Growth in proportion of credit given by MFI to women

N/A 5 15 30

National Treasury

Stable Macro- economic Environmen

% increase in Economic growth (GDP)

4.6248 7.8 10.6 >10.8

% reduction in average 11.73 8.3249 7.3 4.8

247HDI 2012 Report.(GII) reflects gender - based inequalities in three dimensions – reproductive health, empowerment, and economic activity. Netherlands ranks

1st with 0.045, China 0.213, Brazil 0.447, South Africa 0.462, Ghana 0.565 248Kenya Economic Survey 2013 249World Development Indicators 2013. Japan ranks 3rd with 0.91, Malaysia 1.81%, South Africa 3.3%, Hong Kong 4.99%, Singapore 5.24%, Botswana 7.39% and

Nigeria 8.39%

95





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

t interest rate spread (difference between

typical lending and deposit rates)

% increase in overall Balance of payment

Kshs.122.9 billion

20 50

Reduction in Inflation rate250

9.6 5 5 <5

Reduction in Gross Government Debt(% of GDP)251

49.5252 49 48 18.4

Increased Gross international Reserves (Months of Import cover)253

3.9 5.3 6.0 10

Improvement in fiscal deficit(% of GDP)254

-6.8 -4.1 -3.8 0.7

Effective Improvement in revenue 24.1 25.5 25.7 27

250 Central Bank of Kenya monetary policy aims to achieve stable prices with an inflation target of 5%. WEF 2012/13 UAE ranks 1st with 0.9%, Malaysia 3.2%, South

Africa 5.0% and China 5.4% 251 Global Finance and World Economic Outlook 2012- Gross government debt (% of GDP) for Botswana was 13.6, China 22.2, Indonesia 23.9, South Africa 41.2,

Thailand 44.2, and India 67.6. 252Annual Public Debt Report2012/13. 253Reserves expressed in terms of the number of months of imports of goods and services they could pay for (World Bank data). Algeria 34months, China 19 months,

Japan 14 months, Botswana 10 months, Malaysia 7 months and Singapore 6 months. 254Fiscal Surplus/ Deficit. Singapore 8.7%, Angola 6.7%, Botswana 1.4%, India -3.8%, Malaysia -4.5%, South Africa -4.6% and Japan -8%

96





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

mobilization and

Management of public resources

to GDP ratio255

Efficiency of revenue mobilization256

4.0 4.5 5 6

Improvement in Country’s Credit Rating257

29.1 37 53 64

Level of utilization of allocated funds for both National and County Governments258

N/A 100 100 100

Improvement in level of score on Financial Auditing and Reporting Standards regarding financial performance259

4.4 4.9 5.4 6.5

Improvement on global Ranking on the ease and simplicity in the process

166

Top 100 Top 50 Top 20

255 Kenya Vision 2030 target for 2015 was 22%. In 2012, South Africa was at 26.5% and Belgium at 25.7% 256 World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Analysis 2012- efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). In 2012, Samoa was at 4.5 while Ethiopia

and India was at 4.0 257 Assess the probability of sovereign debt default on a 0–100 (lowest probability) scale. Norway ranks 1st with score 94.9, India 64, South Africa 61.4, Algeria 53.7

and Ghana 37.2 258 Utilization based on 2013/2014 budget cycle- Controller of Budget 259Measures strength of Auditing and Reporting Standards regarding financial performance. South Africa ranks 1st with score of 6.6, Singapore 6.1, Malaysia 5.4,

India 5.0 and Thailand 4.9

97





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

of paying taxes260

Increase in Gross

National Savings as a %

of the GDP261

13.5% 19.7 25.7 >29

Increase in proportion of

public development spending to the GDP

9.2% 13.5 15 18

Intensity of the budget information disclosure (Open Budget Index)262

49 65 68 90

Improvement in rank on public finance management263

3.1 3.7 4.4 5.5

% increase in level of consistent allocation of funds to sector

60 70 80 100

260Doing Business Report 2012 and Paying Taxes Series 2012 PWC. Singapore ranks 4th, Rwanda 19th, Malaysia 41st, South Africa 44th, Thailand 100th and Japan

120th 261 Kenya Vision 2030 targets 29% by 2030. Global Competitiveness Report 2012/13, Malaysia 33.7, Netherlands 26.4%, Tanzania 23%, South Africa 16.5% 262Open Budget Index (OBI) assigns each country a score from 0 to 100. New Zealand leads in public availability of budget information with 93, South Africa 90 Norway and France 83, India 68, Uganda 65 (Open Budget Survey 2012) 263 Rates wastefulness of Government spending [1 = extremely wasteful; 7 = highly efficient in providing necessary goods and services] WEF 2012/13. Singapore

ranks 1st with 6.0, Rwanda is 4th with 5.5, Malaysia 4.4, China and Botswana at 4.4, China 3.7

98





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

expenditure as per the MDGs and SDGs264

Improvement in diversion index score of public funds265

2.8 3.7 4.2 5.1

% increase in growth in the pension funds

522.6266 Billion Kshs.

30 50 200

Improvement in insurance penetration ratio (Premiums as % of GDP)267

3.05 3.5 3.9 6.0

Improvement in the score level of encouragement in the Rules governing Foreign Direct Investment268

4.4 4.7 4.9 6.9

Competitiv Improvement in the strength of investor

5.0 5.3 6.0 9.3

264 Kenya will implement the Post 2015 Development Agenda. 265 Global Competitive Report 2012/13 [1 = very common; 7 = never occurs] , New Zealand rank 1st with less incidence of diversion of funds at score 6.5, Japan

5.3, Botswana 4.7, Malaysia 4.2, China 3.7 266Based on Retirement Benefits Authority 2nd Half Financial Report 2011/12. Full implementation of new NSSF Act 2013 will greatly increase the pension funds. 267According to World Insurance 2012, Taiwan ranked 1st with 18.19%, South Africa 14.16%, Singapore 6.0%, Mauritius 5.94%, Malaysia 4.8% and India 3.9% 268 WEF 2012/13 on scale [1 = strongly discourage FDI; 7 = strongly encourage FDI]. Ireland ranks 1st with 6.6, Malaysia 5.5, Uganda 5.1, Botswana 4.9, South

Africa 4.7

99





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

eness in finance and Investment Market

Protection Index269

% increase in the amount of Direct Foreign Investment in Kenya

462.5270 20 50 300

Improvement in score on regulation of Securities Exchange271

4.2 4.9 5.3 6.3

Improvement in ranking on availability of financial services to businesses272

4.7 5.0 5.4 6.1

Improvement in global ranking on soundness of Kenyan banks273

5.0 5.4 5.7 6.2

Ease of access to loans274 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.5

269Strength of Investor Protection Index on a 0–10 (best) scale. New Zealand ranks 1st with 9.7, South Africa 8.0, Botswana 6.0 and South Korea 5.3 (WEF 2012/13) 270Kenya Economic Survey 2013 show that in 2011 FDI in was 462.5 Billion Kshs. 271Assess the regulation and supervision of securities exchanges in scale of [1 = ineffective; 7 = effective]. South Africa ranks 1st with 6.5, Malaysia 5.3, Morocco

4.9. WEF 2012/13 272Assess extent the financial sector provide a wide range of financial products and services to businesses [1 = not at all; 7 = provides a wide variety. South Africa

ranks 2nd globally with score 6.4, Singapore 6.1, Thailand 5.4 and India 5.0 (WEF 2012/13) 273 According to WEF 2012/13 where score 1= insolvent and may require a government bailout; 7 = generally healthy with sound balance sheets] |, Canada ranks

1st with 6.9, Mauritius 6.2, India 5.7 and Japan 5.4 274 WEF 2012/13 on the scale[1 = very difficult; 7 = very easy] Qatar is 1st with 4.9, Malaysia 4.4, Luxemburg 4.1, USA 3.8 and South Africa 3.5

100





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

Rankings on financing through local equity275

4.4 4.7 5.0 >5.5

% increase in number of companies listed on the stock exchange

61276 Companies

10 30 >100

Improvement in level of

influence of taxation to work or investment277

3.3 4.0 4.7 5.4

Reduction in number of procedures required to start a business278

11 9 8 4

Level of efficiency of customs procedure279

3.4 3.8 4.3 5

% Increase in proportion of investment to GDP280

20.6 26.9 30.0 >32

275 Measure how easy is it to raise money by issuing shares on the stock market. Hong Kong ranks 1st with 5.7, South Africa is 3rd with 5.4, Singapore 5.1, Malaysia

4.9, France 4.7, India 4.6 276 The number of listed companies as at July 2014 277WEF 2012/13. Bahrain is at the top on low level of tax impact on work or investment with score 6.2 where [1 = significantly limits incentives to work or invest; 7

= has no impact on incentives to work or invest] . Singapore 5.5, Mauritius 5.1, South Africa 4.0 278Doing Business 2012/WEF 2012/13. Canada has 1 requirement, Malaysia 4, South Africa 5, Ghana 7, Japan 8 and Gabon 9. Kenya had 10 in 2013. 279 WEF 2012/13 on the scale 1 = extremely inefficient; 7 = extremely efficient]. Singapore was 1st with 6.2, Malaysia 5.0, USA 4.5, South Africa 4.3 and Thailand

4.3. Kenya had a score of 3.6 in 2013 280Kenya Economic Survey 2013. Kenya Vision 2030 target if 32% of GDP by the year 2030

101





STATUS


2015 2017 2030

% increase in proportion of Kenyans access to formal financial services

42.3281 20 60 80

281World Bank 2011.Adults with an account at a formal fin.inst. to total adults (%). Singapore 98.2, USA 87.9, Malaysia 66.7,

102

CHAPTER 9

GOVERNANCE, JUSTICE LAW AND ORDER SECTOR

9.1 INTRODUCTION

The Governance, Justice Law and Order Sector (GJLOS) is premised within the political

pillar of the Kenya Vision 2030 and plays an important role in providing an enabling

environment for social-economic development of the country as outlined in the Second

Medium Term Plan (MTP II 2013-2017).

The Sector has the responsibility of providing:

i. Effective policing services;

ii. Coordination of National Government,

iii. Peace building and conflict management;

iv. Reforming of laws;

v. Promotion and protection of human rights;

vi. Registration services;

vii. Administration and access to justice,

viii. Prosecution and legal advice to Government agencies;

ix. Promotion of integrity and the fight against corruption;

x. Management of electoral process;

xi. Regulation of gaming industry;

xii. Management of custodial and noncustodial offenders;

xiii. Spearheading implementation of the Constitution;

xiv. Providing population management services;

xv. Eradication of drugs and substance abuse;

xvi. Promotion of gender equality and freedom from discrimination;

xvii. Witness protection;

xviii. Crime research;

xix. Government printing services; and

xx. Regulation of political parties.


Vision

A secure, just, cohesive, democratic, accountable, transparent and conducive

environment for a globally competitive and prosperous Kenya

103


Mission

To ensure effective and accountable leadership, promote a just, democratic and secure

environment as well as establishing strong governance institutions to empower citizens,

for the achievement of socio-economic and political development

9.3 Strategic Objectives of the Sector

The main objectives of the Sector are to:-

i. Strengthen institutions and systems of governance;

ii. Enhance constitutional compliance among state and non-state actors;

iii. Maintain law and order and ensure public safety, peace and security;

iv. Improve the custodial facilities, supervision, rehabilitation, reintegration and

resettlement of offenders and vulnerable groups;

v. Improve access to justice to all Kenyans irrespective of status;

vi. Prevent and combat corruption and economic crimes;

vii. Promote national values and ethics, ethnic harmony and cohesion;

viii. Enhance the security of identification, registration and migration services;

ix. Promote and protect human rights, gender equality and non-discrimination;

x. Deliver free, fair and credible elections;

xi. Enhance the capacity of printing, supply and security of government documents;

xii. Regulate gaming industry and;

xiii. Regulate political parties.

9.4 Sub-sectors

The Governance, Justice, Law and Order Sector (GJLOS) consists of fifteen (15) sub-

sectors namely:

i. State Department for Interior;

ii. State Department for Coordination of National Government;

104


iii. Office of the Attorney General and Department of Justice;

iv. The Judiciary;

v. Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC);

vi. Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP);

vii. Commission for the Implementation of the Constitution (CIC);

viii. Office of the Registrar of Political Parties (ORPP);

ix. Witness Protection Agency (WPA);

x. Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR);

xi. Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC);

xii. Judicial Service Commission (JSC);

xiii. National Police Service Commission (NPSC);

xiv. National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC); and

xv. Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA).

9.5 Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs)

There are 11 SAGAS in the sector which undertake specialized functions and have

specific mandates. There are eleven (11) tribunals in the sector

9.5.1 SAGAs

i. National Campaign against Drug Abuse Authority (NACADA)

ii. The Kenya Citizens and Foreign Nationals Management Service

iii. Kenya Copyright Board

iv. National Crime Research Centre

v. Kenya School of Law

vi. Council of Legal Education

vii. Kenya Law Reform Commission

viii. National Council for Law Reporting

ix. Auctioneers Licensing Board

x. The Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration

xi. Asset Recovery Agency

9.5.2 TRIBUNALS

i. Political Parties Disputes Tribunal

ii. Education Appeals Tribunal

iii. HIV and AIDS Tribunal

iv. National Environment Tribunal

v. Rent Restriction Tribunal

105


vi. Sports Dispute Tribunal

vii. Energy Tribunal

viii. Cooperative Tribunal

ix. Industrial Property Tribunal

x. The Standards Tribunal

xi. Business Premises Rent Tribunal

9.6 Key Results Areas

i. Improved internal Security of people and property ii. Partnerships and collaborations in policing iii. Efficient traffic control and management iv. Effective Public participation in government development initiatives v. Effective Criminal justice system vi. Civil justice delivery system vii. Criminal justice delivery system viii. Humane treatment of offenders ix. Expeditious administration of justice x. Effective and efficient management system of Gaming, betting and lotteries. xi. Effective immigration services xii. Efficient registration of persons of age 18 and above xiii. Efficient registration of births and deaths xiv. Efficient management of refugees affairs xv. Effective implementation of the Constitution

xvi. Transparency, ethics electoral integrity

106


SECTOR: GOVERNANCE, JUSTICE, LAW AND ORDER

SUB -SECTOR

KEY RESULT AREAS


Status 2012 Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National

Government

Improved internal Security of people and

property

Police population ratio282

1:562 1:500 1:450 1:400

Improved index measure of cost of crime and violence on business283

3.5 4.5 5.0 6.3

282 Police population ratio in 2009 was 1:533. This figure includes Administration Police Officers. Current population computation is 43.2 Million in 2012 divide by

0.076882M police and administration police officers equal 1: 562. There will be a recruitment of 10,000 officers in the year 2014. Benchmarking with UN ratio

1:450. 283The Global Competitive Report 2013 ranked Kenya’s index was 3.5 where 1-to a great extent and 7- not at all. Libya’s index was 5.6, Rwanda 5.6, Liberia was

4.5, Singapore was 6.3. In 2012 Kenya has since moved to 3.5, and Singapore went down to 6.1. The highest is Qatar at 6.6.

107



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS Status 2012 Performance Targets

2015 2017 2030

Improved ratio of police per square Kilometer in Northern Kenya region284

1:32 1.20 1:10 1:10

Reduction in crime per capita per 100,000 people285

125 110 37 20

% Increase in Kenya’s peace index (global peace index)

2.466 2.20 2.00 1.55286

Reduction in police response time to distress calls (min)

90 60 30 3287

284 Total population in all Northern Counties is 4,337,253 (2009 population census). Area is 322,019 sq.km. If we are to achieve the UN standard of 1:450, it

works out to be 1 police officer per 33.5 sq.km. The calculation is based on total population per 100, 000 dived by the total security workforce for NPS not area. 285 According to the 2013 Annual crime Statistics (Kenya Police Reports) the Crime level reduced by 8% compared to the previous period. 2014 Population

estimate is 43 million against 36,957 crimes translating to 85 crimes per 100,000 people. Benchmarking with Nepal at 37 crimes per 100,000. 286Benchmark with Singapore. 287 Benchmarking with Philippines

108



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Increase in number of police dogs (K9s) for crime detection provided to police officers288

429 500 650 2,000

Partnerships and collaborations in

policing

% Increase Community involvement in crime reduction289

N/A 50 80 100

Improve Police Corruption global position290

139 130 80 50

288The ideal establishment of the number of dogs nationally is 650 according to Crime Survey Index, Kenya Police Reports. The Ransely Report recommends full

establishment of 1,767. 289Launched Nyumba Kumi Initiative to reduce crime in the country. 290 TI survey on perceived levels of public sector corruption, 2012 ranked Kenya on position 139 out 176 countries with a score of 27 where 100 – very clean and

0 is highly corrupt. . The global report for 2009 ranked Kenya 139 out of 176. Benchmarking with Rwanda for 2017, and seek to improve towards 2030. Index is a

better measure and therefore should be considered despite the ranking.

109



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Increase the index measure on Reliability of police service by the public291

3.7 4.5 4.9 5.9

Efficient traffic control and management

% Area of major highways covered by CCTV cameras for traffic control and management292

0 20 50 100

Effective Public participation in government development initiatives293

% increase in public awareness programmes implemented on government policies and programmes294

30 75 100 100

291Global Competitive Report 2013. The Ransely Commission benchmarked with Botswana, Sweden and UK. Out of these Sweden’s index is 5.9 in 2013-14. 292Kenya Police Service Reports. For 2012 the highways targeted to be covered with the CCTV cameras are Uhuru highway, Mombasa Road, Thika Road and

Nairobi-Nakuru highway. 293Through the awareness campaigns and public barazas 294Programmes and policies that are specific to the relevant target groups

110



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Effective Criminal

justice system

Improved global rating of Correctional institutions295

3 4.0 6.0 8.0

Increase the prison officers inmate ratio to international standards296

1:12

1:11 1:8 1:5

Civil justice delivery system

index297

Improve civil justice delivery system index

0.55 0.79 0.87 0.90

Criminal justice delivery system index298

Improve criminal justice delivery system index

0.49 0.82 0.87 0.90

295World Justice Project Report 2013: Kenya – 3.0, Finland – 0.80, South Africa – 3.0 296International staff inmate ratio is 1:5 297World Justice Project Report 2013-14.Benchmark with Singapore.

298World Justice Project Report 2013-14.Benchmark with Singapore.

111



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Humane treatment of offenders

% Increase in number of new modern model prisons completed

10299 50 80 100

% decongestion of prisons300

200 160 120 <100

Expeditious administration of

justice

Improve effectiveness of criminal investigative system301

0.44 0.50 0.7 0.9

Improvement in effectiveness of Correctional system302

0.29

0.40 0.50 0.80

299Initiated the construction of 6 new prisons namely Rachuonyo, Vihiga, Nyamira, Kaloleni, Kwale and Mwingi. These are identified flagship projects in Vision

2030 Blue Print. 300The Kakamega prison is over congested to 300% while the least congested is Mandera prisons at 70% 301 World Justice Project (WJP) Report is in terms of index, where 1.0 is best and 0.0 is worst. 2013-14 Report Kenya is at 0.44, Botswana is 0.75, Malaysia is

0.72, and Finland is 0.9. 302 WJP Report 2013-14: where 1.0 is best and 0.0 is worst. Botswana is 0.5, Malaysia is 0.44, Thailand is 0.62, Finland is 0.78, and Korea is 0.8.

112



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Effective and efficient management system of Gaming, Betting and Lotteries

% reduction in illegal gambling

66 cases

(100%)

54.5 45.5 0

Effective immigration services

Reduction in average days time for Passport processing303

8 days 4 days 3 days 1 day

Efficient Registration of Persons of age 18 and above

% increase in number of people registered for IDs annually304

215,500 (9.39%)

80 90 100

Reduction No. in waiting days for processing IDs Nairobi

16 10 2 0

Reduction in waiting days for processing IDs in ASAL areas

40 days 10 2 0

303Eldoret, Kisumu and Embu it takes a maximum of two days. 304 This is % of total population who qualify for ID registration

113



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Efficient Registration of Births and

Deaths

% increase in birth registration coverage in ASAL areas305

26.24

50

80

100

% increase in birth registration coverage Nationally306

59.64 80 90 100

% increase in death registration in ASAL areas307

13.32 50 90 100

% increase in death registration national coverage308

49.8 80 90 100

305 % birth registration coverage in ASAL areas = Registered figures/expected figures. In 2012, the registered were 60, 035 and the expected births were 228,821.

Hence the coverage was (60,035/228,821)*100=26.24% 306 % birth registration coverage nationally = Registered figures/expected figures. In 2012, the registered were 832,236 and the expected births were 1,395,425.

Hence the coverage was (832,236/1,395425)*100=59.64 307 % death registration coverage in ASALS areas = Registered figures/expected figures. In 2012, the registered were 6,213 and the expected deaths were 47,008.

Hence the coverage was (6,213/47,008)*100=13.32% 308 % death registration coverage nationally = Registered figures/expected figures. In 2012, the registered were 194,127 and the expected deaths were 389,757.

Hence the coverage was (194,127/389757)*100=49.8%

114



SUB -

SECTOR

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE


2015 2017 2030

Efficient management of refugee affairs

% of registered refugees annually

42,954 100% 100% 100%

SUB-SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREA

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

Status

2012

2015 2017 PERFORMANCE

TARGET 2030

Office of the Attorney General and

Effective implementation of the Constitution

Legislation enacted for effective implementation of the Constitution309

30 42 49 Review

309 Out of the 49 legislations earmarked for the effective implementation of the Constitution under Schedule 5 of the Constitution, 16 were developed and enacted

during the first year of the Constitution implementation (2010/2011), 14 during the second year (2011/2012), and 4 during the third year (2012/2013). 8 Bills are

scheduled for the year 2013/2014 (ending on 26 August 2014) while 7 bills will be developed during 2015/2016).

115


SUB-SECTOR KEY RESULT

AREA

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

Status

2012

2015 2017 PERFORMANCE

TARGET 2030

Department of Justice

Transparency,

Ethics and

Integrity

Corruption perception index score improved

27310 40311 65 87

310 Transparency International Report 2013 puts Kenya as 27 and ranked 136 out of 175. Benchmarking with Botswana is at 65 and Singapore at 87 for 2017 and

2030. 311 The National Anti Corruption Policy will be developed by December 2014 in line with the Presidential directive of 18th March 2014. Meanwhile, a Concept Paper

on the same has been prepared.

116

CHAPTER 10

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES SECTOR

10.1 Introduction

Kenya’s Economic Survey Report (2013) indicates that 42% of her Gross Domestic

Product (GDP) is derived from natural resources based sectors. The Environmental

Protection, Water and Natural Resources sector is the largest natural resources based

sector therefore presents great potential in the attainment of the targeted annual GDP

growth rate of 10% as stipulated is in the Kenya Vision 2030.

The sector is composed of two sub-sectors namely: Environment, Water and Natural

Resources and Mining. The Environment, Water and Natural Resources Sub-Sector is

composed of the State Departments of Environment and Natural Resources and Water

whereas Mining Sub-Sector is composed of the State Department of Mining. The sector

has twenty five (25) Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies (SAGAs) and four other

institutions.


Vision

Sustainable development in a secure environment

Mission

To promote sustainable utilization and management of environment and natural

resources for socio- economic development

10.3 Strategic goals/Objectives of the Sector

The overall goal of the sector is sustainable development in a clean and secure

environment. The specific objectives include:

i. To develop, implement and review sectoral strategies, policies and legislative

frameworks in line with the Constitution;

ii. To enhance sustainable management of environment and natural resources;

iii. To enhance access to natural resources benefits for socio-economic development;

iv. To enhance capacity building for environment and natural resources management;

v. To promote and implement integrated regional development programmes; and

vi. To enhance research on environment and natural resources for sustainable

development;

117


10.4 Sub-Sectors and their Mandates

The sector has two sub-sectors:

i. Environment, Water and Natural Resources, and

ii. Mining

Their mandates are as outlined below.

10.4.1 Environment, Water and Natural Resources

The mandate of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Sub-Sector includes:

i. Environmental policy management;

ii. Forest development policy management;

iii. Regional Development Authority policy;

iv. Water Resources Management policy;

v. Water and Sewerage Services policy;

vi. Waste water treatment and disposal policy management;

vii. Conservation and protection of national wildlife;

viii. Management of Marine parks;

ix. Meteorological Management;

x. Water catchment area conservation, control and protection;

xi. Restoration of Lake Naivasha Basin;

xii. Development of Forest;

xiii. Re-afforestation and agro-forestry;

xiv. Kenya Forest Services;

xv. Restoration of strategic water towers;

xvi. Protection and regulation of marine ecosystems;

xvii. Meteorological Training;

xviii. National Environment Management;

xix. Management of Lake Victoria Basin and Environment Programmes;

xx. Water Quality and Pollution Control, and

xxi. Flood control and reclamation.

The sub-sector is also mandated with coordination of climate change affairs, and

management of public water schemes and community water projects.

10.4.2 Mining Sub-Sector

The mandate of the Mining Sub-Sector includes:

i. Mineral exploration and mining policy and management,

118


ii. Inventory and Mapping of Mineral Resources,

iii. Mining and Minerals Development, and

iv. Policies on the management of quarrying and mining of rocks and industrial

minerals.

The sub-sector is also mandated with management of health conditions, as well as health

and safety in mines, resources surveys and remote sensing, and policy on extractive.


The sector has twenty five SAGAs and four other institutions as described below:

i. Kenya Forest Research Institute (KEFRI)

ii. Kenya Forest Service (KFS)

iii. Kenya Water Institute (KEWI)

iv. Kenya Water Towers Agency (KWTA)

v. Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS).

vi. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)

There are three other institutions that play an important role in the Environment

Protection, Water and Natural Resources sector under NEMA. These include:

a)National Environment Tribunal (NET)

b) National Environment Trust Fund (NETFUND)

c) Public Complaints Committee (PCC)

vii. National Water Conservation and Pipeline Corporation (NWCPC)

viii. Regional Development Authorities (RDAs)

There are six (6) Regional Development Authorities in the country. They include:

a) Tana and Athi Rivers Development Authority (TARDA);

b) Kerio Valley Development Authority (KVDA);

c) Lake Basin Development Authority (LBDA);

d) Ewaso-Nyiro North Development Authority (ENNDA);

e) Ewaso-Nyiro South Development Authority (ENSDA), and

f) Coast Development Authority (CDA).

ix. Regional Water Services Boards (WSBs)

There are eight (8) regional WSBs in the country. They include:

a) Tana Water Services Board;

b) Athi Water Services Board;

c) Tanathi Water Services Board;

d) Lake Victoria South Water Services Board;

119


e) Lake Victoria North Water Services Board;

f) Rift Valley Water Services Board;

g) Coast Water Services Board, and

h) Northern Water Services Board.

x. Water Appeals Board (WAB)

xi. Water Resources Management Authority (WRMA)

xii. Water Services Regulatory Board (WASREB)

xiii. Water Services Trust Fund (WSTF)

xiv. Wildlife Clubs of Kenya (WCK)


i. Clean and Secure Environment

ii. Improved waste management and pollution control

iii. Controlled climate change and Desertification iv. Wildlife Conservation and Management v. Forest and wildlife Conservation and Management vi. Sustainability of forests and wildlife

vii. Improved irrigation and drainage infrastructure viii. Available and accessible safe water ix. Increased benefits to Kenyans through optimal exploration, mining and utilization

of oil and mineral resources x. Adequate Sanitation

120



SECTOR: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES

SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

Environment, water and Natural resource

Clean and Secure Environment

Reduction in carbon emissions (in metric tons) per capita312

0.3054313 0.3012 0.2698 0.2000

% reduction in air emissions per capita to the environment(including greenhouses gases)314

2.4 3315 5 15316

% reduction of particulate matter in the air317

N/A 3 5 15

% increase in private and public organizations that use a recognized environmental or social management/reporting/auditing

24 60 100 100

312 Vision 2030 progress report of 1st February, 2013 states that environment challenge is low levels of environmental management. MTP II envisages a Green

Economy. Indicators on Co2 emissions (metric tons per capita) by World Bank report of 2010: Ethiopia 0.1, Austria 0.0, Haiti 0.2, Madagascar 0.1, Rwanda 0.1,

Tanzania 0.2. MTP II envisages a Green Economy 313 Kenya carbon emissions level is 31(last updated on August 7, 2013). Reference Kenya’s National Climate Change Action Plan2013 – 2017 (launched 27th March,

2013). Carbon emissions expected to decline to 17 MtCO2e in 2020 and then to 13 MtCO2e by 2030 due to Government’s effort to restore forests on degraded

lands and conservation and sustainable forest management 314 Major causes of GHE in Kenya from: (i) energy-related GHG emissions expected to reach 25 MtCO2e in 2030; transport projected to reach 18 MtCO2e in 2030 315 Benchmark based on European Joint Research Centre/Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, 2011 reports: % Reduction of air emissions per capita EU

3%, Japan 2%, United Kingdom targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050.USA attained 3.7% reduction in 2012 316 Botswana has targeted to reduce GHG by 30% by 2020 in line with EU regulations. Levels of GHG emissions per capita :Botswana 2.64, Chile 3.31, Cuba 2.41, India 1.38, Kenya 0.30, Malaysia 7.32, Mauritius 3.06 (Source: UN Statistics Division: Millennium Development Goals (2011) 317 Norway reduced by 8% within 10 years: Particulate matter in air is measured as (PM10, PM2.5): 150ug/m3 per day or 50 microns/m3 p.a3

121



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

System(e.g.ISO 14000,etc)

Improved waste management and pollution control

% reduction in Solid waste318 in Kgs per capita

35319 20 10 0

Wildlife

Conservation and Management

Survival rate of endangered specifies in established and branded wildlife conservation parks for increased tourist traffic 320

22 Parks branded

85 90 100

% Reduction in number of incidences of reported human wildlife conflict

1525 50 25 0

% increase in the security level of Wildlife

90 100 100 100

318 Waste-related GHG emissions are expected to increase to 2 MtCO2e in 2030 (Kenya’s National Climate Change Action Plan2013 – 2017). Un Habitat: Solid Waste (Kg per capita) report at World Urban Forum in Rio, 23 March 2010: Moshi 338, Nairobi 219, Lusaka201, Delhi 184, Dhaka 167, Ghorahi (Nepal) 167. Ghorahi runs cooperatively a state-of-the-art system/facility for waste sorting and recycling, sanitary land filling and treatment 319 SPS 2010 target of 45% was surpassed in 2012 320 Kenya has branded 22 wildlife conservation parks out of 23 National Parks, 31 National Reserves and 6 National Sanctuaries, 4 Marine National Parks and 6

Marine National Reserves at the Coast. KWS manages 154 field stations outside protected areas. Source: KWS Strategic Plan:2012-2017

122



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

Forest and wildlife

Conservation and Management

% Increase in proportion of degraded protected natural forest rehabilitated

415,393 ha321

80 100 100

% increase in forest/tree cover322

4.4%323 8324 10 20325

% Increase in the number of endangered species (wildlife and trees)

263326 10 30 100

Improved irrigation and drainage

infrastructure

Increase in hectares of irrigated area/land327

153,800 ha 200,000

404,800

890,000328

Increase in hectares of drainage area329

33,610 45000 90,000 > 200,000

321 Kenya Vision 2030 progress report of 1st February, 2013 322 The Philippine government plans to increase the country's forest cover from 24% to 30 %. Source: Manila Bulletin – Thu, Apr 24, 2014. 323 Vision 2030 : Second Medium Term Plan:2013-2017 324 Kenya attained 7% of the United Nations requirement of 10 % forest cover by 2013 325 Forest cover: Brazil 56.1%, Tanzania 37.22%, Mauritius 56.10%, Nigeria 12%, Cuba 24,47%, South Africa 7.31%,Ghana 10.2%, Jamaica 30.1%, Source:, CIA

world fact book 326 Species (higher) threatened in Kenya last measured in 2013 according to the World Bank Higher: plant132, Bird 34, fish 69. According to Vision 2030 : Second

Medium Term Plan:2013-2017, 51 mammals have been classified as threatened. 327 Kenya Vision 2030: Second Medium Term Plan: 2013-2017 projected targets. Existing irrigation schemes cover 17% i.e 153,800 ha. Country is to put under

irrigation 404,800 ha 328 Kenya’s irrigation potential stands at 890,000 ha according to Kenya Vision 2030: Second Medium Term Plan: 2013-2017 329 SPS 2010, Vision 2030/Sector projected targets

123



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

% increase in improved flood control/protection330

N/A 10 30 100

Available and accessible safe Water

Increase in renewable fresh water per capita331

647m³ 850 1000 2000m³

% decrease in volume of unaccounted water loss

45332 30 20 5333

increase in surface water storage per capita334

4.5m3 10m³ 30m³ >70m³

Increase in total water storage per capita335

4.3M3 10m³ 16 m³ 100m3

Proportion of urban population with access to clean and safe water336

61.7% 85 90 100

330 SPS 2010, Vision 2030/Sector projected targets

331Kenya is a water-scarce country with less than 1,000m3per capita of renewable freshwater supplies. Botswana 1208, Cuba 3380, Chile 51073, Jamaica 3474,

Kenya 492.5, Rwanda 852, India 1184, Mauritius 2139, Philippines 5039, South Africa 885,Uganda 1109, Tanzania 1812, Ghana 1220, Ethiopia 1365. (Source: The

World bank: World development Indicators (2011). (UN minimum 1000 m3)

332 Vision 2030 : Second Medium Term Plan:2013-2017 333 Singapore benchmark: Unaccounted water (up to 57%). Singapore’s National Water Services Strategy 2007-2015 proposes reduction to 30% by 2015 334 SPS 2010,, Vision 2030 projected targets 335 Vision 2030 projected targets 336 % based on Joint WHO/UNICEF progress report on improved Water –Sanitation access, 2014 update: Botswana 99%, Cuba 96%, Chile100%, Indonesia

93%, Jamaica 97%, Israel 100%, India 97%, Malaysia 100%, Mauritius 100%, Philippines 92%, South Africa 99%. Reasonable access-fountain or water spigot

within 200 meters of the household

124



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

Proportion of rural population with access to clean and safe water337

47.1% 65 70 100

Amount of water access per capita338 (in liters per day)

<4 7 10 20

% increase in per capita water available)

59339 90 100 100

% of households using water from sources considered safe340

62 90341 100 100

Adequate

Sanitation

% of urban population accessing safe/improved sanitation facilities

70.6 80342 90 100343

337 % based on Joint WHO/UNICEF progress report on improved Water –Sanitation access, 2014 update: Botswana 93%, Cuba urban 87%, Chile 91%,

Indonesia 76%, Jamaica 89%, Israel 100%, India 91%, Malaysia 99%, Mauritius 100%, Philippines 91%, South Africa 88%

338Access water per capita: 20 liters per day (U.N). Worldwide, the average water availability per person is close to 7,000m3.Water availability enhanced by

investing in water storage infrastructure, expanding irrigation systems, applying desalination and wastewater re-use technologies and mitigating

unsustainable/inefficient use. (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMNAREGTOPWATRES/Resources/Water_Sector_Brief--Fall2010.pdf) 339 Government’s Joint Monitoring Programme’s 2012 report (on water and sanitation crisis) points out access to safe water supplies throughout Kenya is 59% 340 Singapore achieved 100% access to basic sanitation as well as safe drinking water for the population (http://www.unep.org/GC/GCSS-VIII/Singapore.IWRM.pdf). National % based on Joint WHO/UNICEF progress report on improved Water –Sanitation access, 2014 update: Botswana 97%, Cuba 94%, Chile 99%, Indonesia 85%, Jamaica 93%, Israel 100%, India 93%, Malaysia 100%, Mauritius 100%, Philippines 92%, South Africa 95%, Rwanda 71%, Sub Saharan Africa 64% 341 MDG target is 90% 342 MDG target 343 % based on Joint WHO/UNICEF progress report on improved Water –Sanitation access, 2014 update: Botswana 78%, Cuba 94%, Chile 100%, Indonesia 71%,

Jamaica78%, Israel 100%, India 60%, Malaysia 96%, Mauritius 92%, Philippines 79%, South Africa 82%.

125



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

% of rural population accessing safe/improved sanitation facilities

63.8 70 75 100344

% of households connected to a sewage system in urban areas

21.85 70 77.5 100

Proportion of population using an improved sanitation facility

50 72.5 80 100

Oil and Mineral Resources

Increased benefits to Kenyans through optimal exploration, mining and utilization of oil

% increase in value of mineral output 345

Kshs 27.6 billion346

5 10 20

% of successful petroleum exploration blocks

Ongoing exploration to establish commercial viability347

50 100 100

344 % based on Joint WHO/UNICEF progress report on improved Water –Sanitation access, 2014 update: Botswana 42%, Cuba 88%, Chile 89%, Indonesia 46%,

Jamaica 82%, Israel 100%; India 25%, Malaysia 95%, Mauritius 90%, Philippines 69%, South Africa 62%. 345Minerals considered are Soda Ash, Fluospar, Salt, Crushed refined Soda, Carbon dioxide, Diatomite, Gold and Gemstones. Titanium ore production, started 2014 will be added to the list according to Vision 2030:Second MTP: 2013-2017 346Kenya Economic Survey 2014 indicates the total value of mineral output declined by 28.6 % from KSh 27.6 billion in 2012 to KSh 19.7 billion in 2013 mainly

due to declines in fluorspar and gold production. In Vision 2030 : Second Medium Term Plan:2013-2017, the exploitation of Kwale mineral deposits covering 1,355

ha will make country a global producer of rutile, zircon and titanium concentrates. In addition, exploitation of coal deposits in Kitui and other mines in the country

point to future prospects of recouping the loss of 2013

347 Government has signed production sharing contracts with International Oil Companies to carry out exploration at Lamu covering 261,000km2, Mandera 43,404

km3, Nyanza 81,319 km

2and Tertiary Rift 106,673 km

2

126



SUB SECTO

R

KEY RESULT

AREAS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS

CURRENT Status 2012


2015 2017 2030

and mineral

resources

% increase in contribution of oil and mineral resources to foreign exchange earnings348

3% of export earnings349

5 10 30

% increase in % share of oil and mineral resources to GDP350

1351 2.5 3.5 5

348 Primary mining accounted for 38% of South Africa’s exports and 12.3% of total investments in 2010 (Source: Quarterly Financial Statistics, December 2011) 349 Vision 2030: Second Medium Term Plan: 2013-2017. Recent discoveries of oil, gas and other mineral resources to contribute to increased export earnings, GDP

growth, broader social development, infrastructure development, job creation. 350 Mining sector accounted for 9.2% of South Africa’s GDP in 2011 (Source: Quarterly Financial Statistics, December 2011) 351 Vision 2030: Second Medium Term Plan:2013-2017.

127


CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CONCLUSIONS The Sector Performance Standards provide yardsticks for measuring the expected outcomes of the various initiatives rolled out by the Government Ministries and Agencies towards the achievement of Vision 2030 and beyond. These performance standards have been mirrored to the global best practices. The development of Sector Performance Standards entailed determination of a series of Key Results Areas (KRAs) on the basis of sector and sub-sector mandates and alignment to Vision 2030. For each KRA, performance indicators have been determined and targets for immediate, medium term and long term proposed to enable measurement of progress. These KRAs focus on outcome based indicators and form a basis for an effective performance management system that will deliver high quality services and build public confidence and trust in service delivery in the public sector. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. There is need for regular consultations between PCD and its stakeholders to secure understanding, ownership and adoption of Sector Performance Standards.

2. MDAs should undertake key surveys in order to provide data which will facilitate comparability of Kenya to other countries.

3. All public sector institutions are required to apply the standards when crafting performance indicators and setting performance targets.

4. In order to align sector Performance Standard with Medium Term Plans and Vision 2030, these Standards shall be reviewed at the end of MTP2 in 2017.

128


129


REPUBLIC OF KENYA THE PRESIDENCY MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING · 2015. 7. 6. · the sector targets in SPS 2015 have been aligned to the aspirations of the Constitution, Kenya

Documents