This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Reptiles used for medicinal and magic religious purposesin Brazil
Rômulo R.N. Alves 1,2, Nivaldo A. Léo Neto 1, Gindomar G. Santana 3,
Washington L.S. Vieira 3 and Waltécio O. Almeida 4
1 Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Av. das Baraúnas,351/Campus Universitário, Bodocongó, 58109-753, Campina Grande-PB, Brasil
2 Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia),
Laboratório e Coleção de Herpetologia, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia,Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58051-900, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil
4 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Bioprospecção Molecular, Universidade Regional do Cariri,Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Rua Cel. Antônio Luiz 1161, CEP 63100-000,
Key wordsEthnozoology, reptile conservation, traditional medicines, zootherapy.
Introduction
Human use of animals is an integral part of many cultures. Reptiles and human so-cieties have interacted for millennia, virtually wherever they have been in contact.Thereby, reptiles are one of the fundamental ethnozoological entities, and we inter-pret our relationship with reptiles differently depending upon culture, environment,
and personal experience. Evidence from a variety of sources shows that humanshave exploited the eggs, meat, blood, oil, shell, skin, bones, and other parts of thereptiles to provide raw materials for food, toolmaking, ornaments, medicines andreligious objects (e.g., Klemens and Thorbjarnarson, 1995; Franke and Telecky,2001; Fitzgerald et al., 2004; Zhou and Jiang, 2004; Frazier, 2005; Alves et al.,2007a,b; Alves et al., 2008; Alves and Santana, 2008).
Because reptiles possess low energy requirements and tend to have high repro-ductive rates, they often occur at high densities and biomass levels (Pough et al.,2004). These life-history traits make them especially well-suited for managementas a food resource; throughout the lowland tropics, many reptiles have served asan important source of protein for human communities (Mittermeier et al., 1992).Nevertheless, besides the use of them as food, reptiles have been used for vari-ous purposes, for example, trade as pets, for use in traditional medicine and formagical-religious endings (Franke and Telecky, 2001; Fitzgerald et al., 2004; Zhouand Jiang, 2004; Alves and Pereira-Filho, 2007).
Reptiles are among the animal species most frequently used in traditional folkmedicine, and their role in folk practices related to the healing and/or preventionof illnesses has been recorded in different social-cultural contexts throughout theworld (Zhou and Jiang, 2004; Alves and Rosa, 2006, 2007a,b; Mahawar and Jaroli,2006, 2008; Vazquez et al., 2006; Alves et al., 2007b; Alves and Pereira-Filho,2007; Alves et al., 2008a,b).
In Brazil, reptiles have been exploited for many purposes and about 693 speciesare recognized as occurring in Brazil: 357 snakes, 232 lizards, 62 amphisbaenids,6 caimans, and 36 turtles (Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, 2008). A signifi-cant part of this fauna had been used by human populations and some of them havebeen used as merchandise by modern societies. Reptiles are used for meat, leather,ornamental value, magic religious finalities and supposed medicinal importance.In this context, Brazil can be used as a useful case study to increase our knowl-edge of use of reptiles by people and their implications. In this sense, the interestof the present paper is to catalog the reptiles species being used for medicinal ormagic/religious purposes in Brazil and to discuss the implications of these uses forreptile conservation.
Methods
All available references or reports on the species being used for medicinal ormagic/religious purposes in Brazil were examined. Only taxa that could be iden-tified to species level were included in the data base. Scientific names pro-vided in publications were updated according to the ITIS Catalogue of Life:2008 Annual Checklist (http://www.catalogueoflife.org/search.php) and BrazilianList of Amphibians and Reptiles of Brazilian Society of Herpetology (http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br/). The conservation status of the reptile species follows
IUCN 2008 (http://www.iucnredlist.org/) and CITES 2008 (http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/species.html).
The sources analyzed were: Branch and Silva (1983), Begossi (1992), Begossiand Braga (1992), Figueiredo (1994), Marques (1995), Freire (1996), Costa-Neto(1996, 1999a,b,c,d, 2000a,b,c, 2001), Begossi et al. (1999), Costa-Neto and Oliveira(2000), Seixas and Begossi (2001), Almeida and Albuquerque (2002), Silva et al.(2004), Almeida (2005), Pinto and Maduro (2003), Alves (2006a,b), Alves andRosa (2006, 2007a,b), Alves et al. (2007a,b), Alves and Pereira-Filho (2007), Alvesand Santana (2008), Alves (2008), Alves et al. (2008a,b,c) and Alves (2009).
Reptile species used
Of 44 species (35 genera and 17 families), 42 are used for medicinal purposes,two for magical religious endings and 11 for both. The largest numbers of speciesused were snakes (15), turtles and tortoises (14), lizards (10), and crocodilians (5)(table 1). The high taxonomic diversity observed among reptiles used as remediesand magic purposes is not surprising, given that numerous workers have pointedout that reptiles are among the animals most frequently used in folk medicine (e.g.,Branch and Silva, 1983; Begossi, 1992; Seixas and Begossi, 2001; Almeida and Al-buquerque, 2002; Silva et al., 2004; Alves and Rosa, 2007a,b; Alves et al., 2007a).
Reptiles represent ingredients used in most traditional medical systems globally(Adeola, 1992; Sodeinde and Soewu, 1999; El-Kamali, 2000; Lev, 2003; Wal-ston, 2005; Alakbarli, 2006; Mahawar and Jaroli, 2006, 2008; Dharmananda, 2007;Fretey et al., 2007; Negi and Palyal, 2007). Alves et al. (2008) summarized the useof reptiles in traditional folk medicine worldwide and documented the use of 165species, but they suggested that this was an underestimate. The widespread use ofreptiles in traditional medicine, the increasing reliance on such approaches amongthose in developing countries who cannot afford western health care (Alves andRosa, 2007b) and the interest in the developed world in alternative medicine havecontributed to the great demand for reptiles and reptile products.
Some widespread species are used in different regions. For example, the medici-nal use of Tupinambis spp. has been recorded in various localities of regions north-east, north and southeast of Brazil (Branch and Silva, 1983; Begossi, 1992; Begossiand Braga, 1992; Alves et al., 2007a; Alves and Rosa, 2007a,b). On the other hand,the medicinal use of the Amazonian species Podocnemis expansa, Melanosuchusniger and Podocnemis unifilis was only recorded in the north region (Alves andRosa, 2007a,b; Alves and Santana, 2008). These results corroborated Alves andRosa (2007b) that suggest the close relationship among the locals’ inhabitants andtheir natural environment. As dwellers of areas very close to nature, and havingdaily encounters with their ambient animal resources, they have been able to gain avast experience of local animal resources utilization.
An analysis of historical documents indicated that reptiles have been used in tra-ditional medicines in Brazil since the beginning of colonization (see Silva et al.,2004; Almeida, 2005; Alves et al., 2007a). For example, during his voyage throughthe interior of Brazil in the nineteenth century, Von Martius (1939) recorded manynatural medicines used by the Amerindian tribes he encountered, such as freshfat of a caiman applied to alleviate rheumatism (Costa Neto, 2005). Even today,caiman fat (Cayman latirostris, Melanosuchus niger and Paleosuchus palpebrosus)is used in rural and urban communities to treat rheumatism (Alves and Rosa, 2006,2007a,b). Some examples of reptiles that have been used in Brazil since colonialtimes include: Iguana iguana, Caiman latirostris, Crotalus durissus, and Micrurusibiboboca.
Reptiles are used to treat approximately 100 illnesses. Thirty-three species havemultiple therapeutic uses, which were prescribed to treat various diseases, whiledifferent reptiles can likewise be used to treat the same illnesses. Products derivedfrom Tupinambis merianae and T. teguixin, for instance, were indicated for treating8 and 18 conditions, respectively, and medicinal products of Eunectes murinus werementioned as useful in the treatment of wounds, skin problems, bruises, sprains,arthrosis, rheumatism, boils, sexual impotence, headache, sore throat, thrombosis,swelling, tumour, asthma, muscle strain, numbness, syphilis, to reduce pain, luxa-tion (Alves et al., 2007a).
Different ways of preparing and administering animal remedies were recorded.Hard parts, such as bones, rattles from snakes and skin generally are sun-dried,grated and crushed to powder, being then administered as tea or taken during meals,while fat and oil are either ingested or used as an ointment, in according to diseasetreated (Alves and Rosa, 2006; Alves et al., 2007).
Human societies often have elaborate typical cultural beliefs, values, and cus-toms regarding wildlife, including reptiles. Besides their role in healing, naturalproducts frequently have magical-religious significance, reflecting the differentviews of health and disease that exist within different cultures. Brazilian traditionalhealing is intertwined with cultural and religious beliefs, and is holistic in nature.The influence of magical beliefs integrated into traditional medicine in Brazil isapparent, and zootherapeutic practices are closely connected with Afro-Brazilianreligions (which have also incorporated elements from indigenous peoples). Rep-tiles are employed within a magical-prophylactic perspective, with the purpose ofwarding off diseases of ‘unnatural’ origin — a practice that encompasses percep-tions related to the belief that supernatural forces are involved in causing diseases,as well as in their treatment. In this context, animal parts are used to prepare clinicalremedies as well as to make amulets or charms used in magical/religious diag-noses. Popular beliefs usually affect the way species are used in zootherapy (Alvesand Rosa, 2006). One form of spiritual treatment involves the use of amulets con-taining reptile parts to protect the user from the ‘evil-eye’ or from diseases (Alvesand Pereira-Filho, 2007). An example is caiman teeth (C. latirostris, M. niger, and
P. palpebrosus) used as protection against snake bites (Costa Neto, 2005; Alves etal., 2007a).
Magic religious uses
A variety of wild animals form an integral part of cultural and religious festivalsand ceremonies, some of which seek to promote the good health of local peo-ple and their communities (Ajayi, 1978). During the performance of some ritualsand festivals, for example, certain species may be sacrificed (Adeola, 1992). Rep-tiles are commonly associated to myths in faiths in different countries and alsoused in magic-religious rituals. A good example is the serpent’s cult practice thatpersists in India, central Africa, Oceanic people, Greece, Egypt, Rome and East.The people venerate the proper serpent, serpentiforms illustrations or related to it,ofidaeform gods, sources protectors, representatives of earth fecundity, terrestrialcreative force, of the hermetic secrets, and the infinite (biting the own tail) (Bie-dermann, 1996). Serpent images appear in several objects worldwide. In equatorialAfrica (Congo to Cameroon) the serpent is the shape of good wise persons, forestspirits lead to the right path (Cascudo, 1988).
In Brazil, at least 13 reptile species were recorded as having magic religioususes (Alves, 2006a; Alves and Pereira Filho, 2007; Alves 2008). Reptiles werecommonly sold in outdoor markets and stores that sell religious articles. Reptileproducts are used mainly by Afro-Brazilian religious followers. The animals areoccasionally sold whole, but mostly cut into pieces (flesh, skin, tail, eyes, head,tooth, cloaca, fat, rattle, carapace) with a single reptile providing many differentraw materials (Alves, 2006a; Alves and Pereira Filho, 2007).
Some reptiles uses for magical-religious purposes recorded in Brazil are sim-ilar to uses in Africa, clearly reflecting an African influence. In the dry regionsof Nigeria, animal products are used in cultural ceremonies (e.g., in funerals orwhen leaders take office), in traditional rites (e.g., to invoke or reconcile with theGods), and have a very significant role in the traditional pharmacopoeia (Adeola,1992). Sodeinde and Soewu (2001) report that in Nigeria animals and their partsare used as charms in ameliorating/treating other conditions. For example, the en-tire Senegal Chameleon Chamaeleo senegalensis making the recipient invincible todetractors/charm. Reptiles and their parts also are used as a sacrifice to appease andinvoke spirits and traditional gods, for example, the head of Python sebae (AfricanPython) is used to invoke and protect against witches. In Brazil, the head of otherBoidae (Boa constrictor) is used for similar purposes.
In addition to whole animals or their parts, other products derived from reptilesare offered for sale in Brazilian cities, principally “águas” (waters) or perfumes and“pó” (dust). The águas or perfumes are products that contain reptiles suspended iningredients such as alcohol, rose water, or solutions containing other plant materi-als. The “waters” or “perfumes” are mixed with water during baths or utilized as aperfume following the bath. It is believed that this procedure will make the bath user
achieve love and financial success (Alves, 2006a; Alves and Pereira Filho, 2007).The pó is produced from the animals or their parts, which are dried in the sun andthen ground to a fine powder with a mortar and pestle. Reptile species utilized forthe preparation of “waters” or “perfumes” and pó (“dust”) are Boa constrictor, Ura-noscodon superciliosus, Chelonoidis denticulata and C. carbonaria.
Reptiles that move slowly (“lerdos”) are used to calm people (“lerdar”). For ex-ample, the products produced from U. superciliosus (dust and water) are used to“amansar” (to calm an aggressive person or ease the anger of someone betrayed bytheir wife or husband). There is an association between the biological characteris-tics of a lizard and the effects its use is expected to generate (Alves, 2006a; Alves,2008). This observation is similar to that of Radbill (1976) who pointed out thatin homeopathic or imitative magic, it is assumed that certain qualities attributed toanimals can be transferred to humans, and that this transfer can occur by inhalation,ingestion or application of the body parts of those animals.
Another product derived from reptiles and very popular in stores are the “patuás”,a kind of amulet that is hung around the neck, glued on a piece of cloth or kept ina pocket or wallet. They are square or round objects, usually made of leather orsome syntactical material, inside which are put animal parts (pieces of snake skinor a dolphin eye) (Alves and Rosa, 2008). According to the owners of shops inwhich this material is traded these amulets are very popular among custumers thatseek good luck, love and financial success (Alves, 2006a; Alves and Pereira-Filho,2007).
There is a great deal of overlap in the use of species as the same species canbe used for multiple magical religious purposes. For example, B. constrictor canbe sold in parts: skin, tail, cloaca, eyes, head, excrement, fat and teeth and alsoproduces águas and pó with the head or body and use of these products have variousindications, such as success in love, with money, with gambling, travel, and businessdealings (Alves, 2006a; Alves and Pereira-Filho, 2007).
Implications for conservation
Our observations demonstrate that 44 reptile species are used in traditional medi-cine and for magic religious purposes in Brazil and that these are collected from thewild. Of these, 23 (52.3%) are included on endangered species lists. The trade ofmedicinal and magic religious reptiles in urban areas (Freire, 1996; Alves, 2006a;Alves and Pereira-Filho, 2007; Alves and Rosa, 2007b) represents an importantfactor for their over-exploitation. Of the species catalogued in this study, 23 are in-cluded in one of three CITES Appendices (see table), although the reasons for theirinclusion are not necessarily related to medicinal use. These results demonstrate theneed to assess the implications of the trade of reptile used for medicinal or magicreligious purposes on their wild populations, and the need for including such usesin discussions of reptile conservation.
Apparently, the magic and medicinal use of reptiles is not a threat to populationsin Brazil. Although capture for these purposes causes an impact, it seems to be lessserious when compared to habitat degradation and capture of animals for other pur-poses. Marques (1997) highlights the medical potential of the Brazilian fauna andthe possibility of its depletion through overexploitation or even species extinction.
Eleven species are used for medicinal and/or magic religious purposes. Someare also hunted as food and represent important protein sources for the inhabi-tants of rural areas and include Podocnemis expansa, P. unifilis, Chelonia mydas,Chelonoidis denticulata, C. carbonaria, T. merianae, Paleosuchus palpebrosus,P. trigonatus, Melanosuchus niger. In addition, some medicinal reptiles are kept aspets, for instance C. carbonaria, C. denticulata and Boa constrictor. These multipleuses of reptiles and their impact on animal populations must be properly assessed(Alves and Rosa, 2006, 2007a) and taken into consideration when implementingrecovery plans for these species, especially those that are highly exploited (Alves etal., 2008b).
Ultimately the most successful conservation programs are those that identify anddeal with the reason a species is endangered and the same time provide economicbenefits to local people (Pough et al., 2004). In that sense, which are the possiblestrategies of management plans and reptiles conservation that can be establishedto minimize the impact of the traditional populations which use several species asfood, medicine and in religious rituals? An alternative proposal can be the creationof cooperatives in rural gatherers communities of reptile breeders for raw mate-rial supplies and products manufacture of medicinal and magic-religious usage.These cooperatives could be part of breeding sites of species such as Podocne-mis expansa, P. unifilis, Chelonia mydas, Chelonoidis denticulata, C. carbonaria,T. merianae, Paleosuchus palpebrosus, P. trigonatus, Boa constrictor, Uranoscodonsuperciliosus, Tupinambis spp. among others, with the appropriate authorizationand regulation of competent governmental bodies, besides a specialists attendancein the area (biologists, veterinarians and zootecnics). An example of a successfulcooperative can be the snake collectors for poison extraction in India (Whitaker,1989).
In addition, the therapeutic indications of wild animals and plants and domesticor cultived species also overlapped in many cases (Alves et al., 2007a). This as-pect opens the possibility of, where suitable, replacing the use of threatened specieswith others in traditional medicine recipes. Such replacement of products is of in-terest from a conservationist perspective, in the context of reducing the pressure onoverexploited populations, or legally protected species (Alves and Rosa, 2007a).Educational programs are also alternatives quite viable, mainly when focused onrural communities where inhabitants eat the reptiles and use in traditional medicineand religious practices. Projects seeking teachers’ formation in those communitiesand the old hunters’ train in sites nearby protected areas helps to minimize the im-pacts upon reptiles. As pointed out by Pough et al. (2004), education is urgentlyneeded at all levels to maintain viable populations of reptiles. Training in areas of
habitat protection, wildlife management, and conservation biology is needed, espe-cially in tropical countries where most species of reptiles are found. The successof conservation and management programs ultimately depends on how well theprograms are tailored to the interests and needs of the people on whose land thethreatened or endangered animal live.
The manner in which natural resources are used by human populations and cul-tural norms associated with that use are extremely relevant to the definition ofpossible conservation strategies (Alves et al., 2008b). Gibbons et al. (2000) pointedout that the use of reptiles is an integral part of many cultures. The great diversity ofinteractions between humans and reptiles provide the foundations for the cultural,economic, emotional, intellectual, social, and spiritual motivations that determinehow conservation and management activities are designed, conducted, and assessed(Frazier, 2005; Alves et al., 2008b). Hence, an understanding of the cultural, social,and traditional role of these reptiles is fundamental for establishing managementplans directed towards the sustainable use. However, because the information iswidely dispersed, and impacts of different types of human-reptiles interactions haverarely been evaluated in a systematic way, this issue needs much greater attention.
References
Adeola, M.O. (1992): Importance of wild animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals, andtraditional medicine, of Nigeria. Environ. Conserv. 19: 125-134.
Ajayi, S.S. (1978): The Utilization of Tropical Forest in West Africa, p. 76. FO:Misc/79/26, FAO,Rome, Italy.
Alakbarli, F. (2006): Medical Manuscripts of Azerbaijan. Baku, Heydar Aliyev Foundation.Almeida, A.V. (2005): Prescrições zooterápicas indígenas brasileiras nas obras de Guilherme Piso
(1611-1679). In: Atualidades em Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia, pp. 47-60. Alves, A.G.C., Lucena,R.F.P., Albuquerque, U.P., Eds, Nuppea, Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia.
Almeida, C.F.C.B.R., Albuquerque, U.P. (2002): Uso de plantas e animais medicinais no Estado dePernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil): Um estudo de caso. Interciencia 27: 276-284.
Alves, R.R.N. (2006a): Uso e comércio de animais para fins medicinais e mágico-religiosos no Nortee Nordeste do Brasil. p. 252, PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba.
Alves, R.R.N. (2006b): Use of marine turtles in zootherapy in Northeastern Brazil. Mar. Turtle Newsl.112: 16-17.
Alves, R.R.N. (2008): Commercialization of Uranoscodon superciliosus Linnaeus (1758) (Tropiduri-dae) for magical-religious purposes in North and Northeastern of Brazil. Sitientibus 8: 257-258.
Alves, R.R.N. (2009): Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed.5: 1.
Alves, R.R.N., Pereira-Filho, G.A. (2007): Commercialization and use of snakes on North and North-eastern Brazil: implications for conservation and management. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 969-985.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (2005): Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines?J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 1: 1-5.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (2006): From cnidarians to mammals: the use of animals as remedies infishing communities in NE Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 107: 259-276.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (2007a): Zootherapeutic practices among fishing communities in North andNortheast Brazil: a comparison. J. Ethnopharmacol. 111: 82-103.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (2007b): Zootherapy goes to town: the use of animal-based remedies inurban areas of NE and N Brazil. J. Ethnopharmacol. 113: 541-555.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L. (2008): Use of tucuxi dolphin Sotalia fluviatilis for medicinal and magicreligious purposes in North of Brazil. Hum. Ecol. 37: 443-447.
Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., Santana, G.G. (2007a): The role of animal-derived remedies as comple-mentary medicine in Brazil. BioScience 57: 949-955.
Alves, R.R.N., Pereira Filho, G.A., Lima, Y.C.C. (2007b): Snakes used in ethnomedicine in NortheastBrazil. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 9: 455-464.
Alves, R.R.N., Santana, G.G. (2008): Use and commercialization of Podocnemis expansa (Schweiger1812) (Testudines: Podocnemididae) for medicinal purposes in two communities in North ofBrazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 4: 1-6.
Alves, R.R.N., Lima, H.N., Tavares, M.C., Souto, W.M.S., Barboza, R.R.D., Vasconcellos. (2008a):Animal-based remedies as complementary medicines in Santa Cruz do Capibaribe, Brazil. BMCComplement. Altern. Med. 8: 1-9.
Alves, R.R.N., Vieira, W.L.S., Santana, G.G. (2008b): Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine:conservation implications. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2037-2049.
Alves, R.R.N., Soares, T.C., Mourão, J.S. (2008c): Uso de animais medicinais na comunidade de BomSucesso, Soledade, Paraíba. Sitientibus 8: 142-147.
Begossi, A. (1992): Food taboos at Búzios Island (SE Brazil): their significance and relation to folkmedicine. J. Ethnobiol. 12: 117-139.
Begossi, A., Braga, F.M.S. (1992): Food taboos and folk medicine among fishermen from the To-cantins River. Amazoniana 12: 101-118.
Begossi, A., Silvano, R.A.M., Amaral, B.D. (1999): Uses of fish and game by inhabitants of an Ex-tractive Reserve (Upper Juruá, Acre, Brazil). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 1: 73-93.
Biedermann, H. (1996): Diccionario de Simbolos. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica, S.A. Barcelona & BuenosAires.
Branch, L., Silva, M.F. (1983): Folk medicine in Alter do Chão, Pará, Brasil. Acta Amaz. 13: 737-797.Cascudo, L.C. (1988): Dicionário do folclore brasileiro. Ed. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Ceballos, C., Fitzgerald, L.A. (2004): Native and exotic turtle trade in Texas. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 32:
881-892.CITES — Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (2007):
CITES species database. (http://www.cites.org/eng/resources/species.html).Costa-Neto, E.M. (1996): Faunistic resources used as medicines by an Afro-Brazilian community
from Chapada Diamantina National Park, state of Bahia-Brazil. Sitientibus 15: 211-219.Costa-Neto, E.M. (1999a): Healing with animals in Feira de Santana city, Bahia, Brazil. J. Ethnophar-
macol. 65: 225-230.Costa-Neto, E.M. (1999b): Barata é um santo remédio: introdução a zooterapia popular no Estado da
Bahia. Feira de Santana, Editora Universitária da UEFS.Costa-Neto, E.M. (1999c): Recursos animais utilizados na medicina tradicional dos índios Pankararés,
que habitam no Nordeste do Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Actual. Biol. 21: 69-79.Costa-Neto, E.M. (1999d): Traditional use and sale of animals as medicines in Feira de Santana city,
Bahia, Brazil. Indig. Knowl. Devel. Monit. 7: 6-9.Costa-Neto, E.M. (2000a): Conhecimento e usos tradicionais de recursos faunísticos por uma comu-
nidade Afro-Brasileira. Resultados Preliminares. Interciencia 25: 423-431.Costa-Neto, E.M. (2000b): Zootherapy based medicinal traditions in Brazil. Honeybee 11: 2-4.Costa-Neto, E.M. (2000c): Introdução a etnoentomologia: considerações metodológicas e estudo de
casos. Feira de Santana, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana.
Costa-Neto, E.M. (2001): A cultura pesqueira do litoral Norte da Bahia. Bahia, EDUFBA; EDUFAL.Costa-Neto, E.M. (2005): Animal-based medicines: biological prospection and the sustainable use of
zootherapeutic resources. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 77: 33-43.Costa-Neto, E.M., Oliveira, M.V. (2000): Cockroach is good for asthma: Zootherapeutic practices in
Northeastern Brazil. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 7: 41-51.Dharmananda, S. (2007): The medicinal use of snakes in China. (http://www.itmonline.org/arts/
snakes.htm).El-Kamali, H.H. (2000): Folk medicinal use of some animal products in Central Sudan. J. Ethnophar-
macol. 72: 279-282.Figueiredo, N. (1994): Os ‘bichos’ que curam: os animais e a medicina de ‘folk’ em Belém do Pará.
Bol. Mus. Para Emílio Göeldi 10: 75-91.Fitzgerald, L.A. (1994): Tupinambis lizards and people: a sustainable use approach to conservation
and development. Conserv. Biol. 8: 12-15.Fitzgerald, L.A., Painter, C.W. (2000): Rattlesnake commercialization: long-term trends, issues, and
implications for conservation. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28: 235-253.Fitzgerald, L.A., Painter, C.W., Reuter, A (2004): Collection, Trade, and Regulation of Reptiles and
Amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert Ecoregion. TRAFFIC North America. Washington, DC,World Wildlife Fund.
Fitzgerald, L.A., Porini, G. Lichtschein, V. (1994): El manejo de Tupinambis en Argentina: historia,estado actual, y perspectivas futuras. Interciencia 19: 166-170.
Franke, M.S., Telecky, T.M. (2001): Reptiles as Pets: An Examination of the Trade in Live Reptiles inthe United States. Hum.Soc. United States.
Frazier, J. (2005): Traditional and cultural use of marine turtles. THIRD MEETING OF THE SIGNA-TORY STATES. Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of MarineTurtles and their Habitats of the Indian Ocean and South-East Asia. Bangkok.
Freire, F.C. (1996): Répteis Utilizados na Medicina Popular no Estado de Alagoas. Maceió, UFAL.Fretey, J., Segniagbeto, G.H., Soumah, M. (2007): Presence of sea turtles in traditional pharmacopoeia
and beliefs of West Africa. Mar. Turtle Newsl. 116: 23-25.Gibbons, J.W., Scott, D.E., Ryan, T.J. (2000): The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians.
BioScience 50: 653-666.Hallam, E. (1996): Gods and Goddesses. A Treasury of Deities and Tales from World Mythology,
p. 184. New York.Ita, E.O. (1994): Aquatic Plants and Wetland Wildlife Resources of Nigeria. CIFA Occasional Paper,
21. Rome, FAO.IUCN — The World Conservation Union (2008): IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
(http://www.iucnredlist.org).Jenkins, M.D. (1995): Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles: The Trade in Southeast Asia. Cambridge,
U.K., TRAFFIC International.Klemens, M.W., Thorbjarnarson, J.B. (1995): Reptiles as a food resource. Biodivers. Conserv. 4: 281-
298.Lev, E. (2003): Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine
practice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 86: 107-118.Mahawar, M.M., Jaroli, D.P. (2006): Animals and their products utilized as medicines by the inhabi-
tants surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park, India. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2: 1-5.Mahawar, M.M., Jaroli, D.P. (2008): Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: A review. J. Ethno-
Marques, J.G.W. (1995): Pescando Pescadores: Etnoecologia Abrangente no Baixo São FranciscoAlagoano. São Paulo, NUPAUB/USP.
Marques, J.G.W. (1997): Fauna medicinal: recurso do ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade? Mutum1: 4.
Mittermeier, R.A., Carr, J.L., Swingland, I.R., Werner, T.B., Mast, R.B. (1992): Conservation ofamphibians and reptiles. In: Herpetology. Current Research on the Biology of Amphibians andReptiles, p. 59-80. Adler, K., Ed., Oxford, Soc. Study Amph. Rept.
Negi, C.S., Palyal, V.S. (2007): Traditional uses of animal and animal products in medicine and ritualsby the Shoka Tribes of District Pithoragarh, Uttaranchal, India. Ethno-Med. 1: 47-54.
Pinto, A.A.C., Maduro, C.B. (2003): Produtos e subprodutos da medicina popular comercializados nacidade de Boa Vista, Roraima. Acta Amaz. 33: 281-290.
Radbill, S.X. (1976): Child hygiene among the Indians. Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 3: 419-512.SBH — Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia (2008): Brazilian reptiles — List of species.
(http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br).Seixas, C., Begossi, A. (2001): Ethnozoology of caiçaras from Aventureiro, Ilha Grande. J. Ethnobiol.
21: 107-135.Silva, M.L.V., Alves, A.G.C., Almeida, A.V. (2004): A zooterapia no Recife (Pernambuco): uma ar-
ticulação entre as práticas e a história. Biotemas 17: 95-116.Sodeinde, O.A., Soewu, D.A. (1999): Pilot study of the traditional medicine trade in Nigeria. Traffic
Bull. 18: 35-40.Vázquez, P.E., Méndez, R.M., Guiascón, O.G.R., Piñera, E.J.N. (2006): Uso medicinal de la fauna
silvestre en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 31: 491-499.Von Martius, C.F.P. (1939): Natureza, Doenças, Medicina e Remédios dos índiosbrasileiros (1844).
São Paulo, Companhia Editora Nacional.Walston, N. (2005): An Overview of the Use of Cambodia’s Wild Plants and Animals in Traditional
Medicine Systems. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Indochina.Whitaker, Z. (1989): Snakeman. India Magazine Books, Bombay, India.Zhou, Z., Jiang, Z. (2004): International trade status and crisis for snake species in China. Conserv.