-
Dynamic Topography Change of theEastern United States Since3
Million Years AgoDavid B. Rowley,1* Alessandro M. Forte,2 Robert
Moucha,3 Jerry X. Mitrovica,4
Nathan A. Simmons,5 Stephen P. Grand6
Sedimentary rocks from Virginia through Florida record marine
flooding during the mid-Pliocene.Several wave-cut scarps that at
the time of deposition would have been horizontal are nowdraped
over a warped surface with a maximum variation of 60 meters. We
modeled dynamictopography by using mantle convection simulations
that predict the amplitude and broad spatialdistribution of this
distortion. The results imply that dynamic topography and, to a
lesser extent,glacial isostatic adjustment account for the current
architecture of the coastal plain andproximal shelf. This confounds
attempts to use regional stratigraphic relations as references
forlonger-term sea-level determinations. Inferences of Pliocene
global sea-level heights or stabilityof Antarctic ice sheets
therefore cannot be deciphered in the absence of an appropriate
mantledynamic reference frame.
Thecontinental margin of the East Coast ofthe United States is
the archetypal Atlantic-type or passive-type continental margin(1).
Such margins have been thought to overlay amantle that is entirely
passive (2). As a conse-quence, passive-type margins are generally
inter-
preted as having simple stratigraphic historiescontrolled by the
interplay between thermallydriven subsidence, sediment loading,
compaction,and sea-level variations (3, 4). Flexural responsesof
the lithosphere resulting fromoff-shore sedimentloading (5, 6) and,
less frequently, onshore ero-
sional unloading (7) are also recognized as poten-tially
important (4–6). These assumptions underpinthe rationale for the
use of the U.S. East Coastmargin in determining global long-term [≥
0.1 mil-lion years (My)] sea-level variations (4–6, 8, 9).
The mantle is not a passive player. Mantleflow influences
surface topography, through per-turbations of the dynamic
topography, in a man-ner that varies both spatially and temporally.
As aresult, it is difficult to invert for the global long-term
sea-level signal and, in turn, the size of theAntarctic Ice Sheet
by using East Coast shorelinedata (10). Factors that need to be
considered in-clude flow associatedwith the negative buoyancyof the
subducted Farallon slab (10–14) and thecoupled shallower westward
flow of hotter man-
1Department of the Geophysical Sciences, 5734 South EllisAvenue,
The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637,
USA.2GEOTOP—Université du Québec à Montréal CP 8888, suc-cursale
Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada. 3De-partment of
Earth Sciences, 204 Heroy Geology Laboratory,Syracuse University,
Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. 4Department ofEarth and Planetary
Sciences, Harvard University, 20 OxfordStreet, Cambridge, MA 02138,
USA. 5Atmospheric, Earth, andEnergy Division, Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory,Livermore, CA 94551, USA. 6Jackson School of
GeologicalSciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
78712, USA.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Fig. 1. Post–mid-Pliocene warping and incision of theCoastal
Plain. (A) Present topography based on ETOPO1emphasizing the
incised, low-relief, mid-Pliocene floodingsurface of the East Coast
Coastal Plain, highlighting (blacksolid and dashed line) the
locations of the Orangeburg,Chippenham (CS), Thornburg (TS)
wave-cut scarps and TrailRidge (TR) and (blue dots) sites with
preserved mid-Pliocene(Yorktown, Duplin, Chorlton, and Cypresshead
Formations)strata. Superimposed are contours showing an estimate
ofthe amplitude of the post–3-Ma change in the dynamictopography
based on TX2007 V2 model. The dynamic to-pography change is shown
by the contours with a 10-mcontour interval, white where they are
superimposed on thetopography. (B) Inset graph of the height of the
OrangeburgScarp as a function of latitude (solid line) based on
(26) andthe highest preserved mid-Pliocene marine sedimentaryrocks
as a function of latitude (dots). (C) Contours of GIA-induced
relative sea level change based on the V2 viscosityprofile
(supplementary text) with a 5-m contour interval. TheOrangeburg,
Chippenham, and Thornburg Scarps areindicated by the thick black
line; the Fall Zone is the thickdashed gray line.
28 JUNE 2013 VOL 340 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org1560
REPORTS
on
Janu
ary
24, 2
017
http
://sc
ienc
e.sc
ienc
emag
.org
/D
ownl
oade
d fr
om
http://science.sciencemag.org/
-
tle (10, 12, 15). The latter produces, at least lo-cally,
changes in buoyancy and associated shorterwavelength changes in
dynamic topography. Bothfactors confound local estimates of
long-term sea-level variations (15).
The Coastal Plain is characterized by a se-quence of marine and
nonmarine sedimentaryunits that range from at least Early
Cretaceous topresent in age. These units generally thicken
east-ward to more than 12 km (16–19). This packageunconformably
overlies pre-Mesozoic crystallinerocks, as well as
Triassic/Jurassic rift-basin strata,and pinches out to the west
along the Fall Zone(Fig. 1A).Models of the depositional
architectureof this margin have been developed on the basisof
combinations of seismic stratigraphy and drill-ing (9, 18, 19) in
order to better understand itsevolution (4–6, 20). Thesemodels have
also beenused to infer global sea-level history by solvingfor the
contributions of thermal subsidence, sedi-ment loading and
compaction, flexural loading,and sediment delivery while assuming
that theonly remaining unknown is the contribution fromchanges in
sea level. Most attempts have fo-
cused on the New Jersey segment of this margin(4–6, 9, 21). A
local and temporally limited sea-level estimate has been made by
using the mid-Pliocene Orangeburg Scarp as a marker (8). Inthis
particular example, after correction for ~50 T18 m of
post–mid-Pliocene uplift derived froma local estimate of stream
incision rate (22), theOrangeburg Scarp has been inferred to have
hadan elevation of 35 T 18 m, which has been takento indicate the
height of themid-Pliocene sea level(8). This height would imply
collapse of theGreenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheets
andpotentially considerable melting of the East Ant-arctic Ice
Sheet during the mid-Pliocene cli-mate optimum (23–25). However,
the Pliocenestrandline and immediately adjacent shallowma-rine
sediments are not preserved at constant ele-vation along the
Coastal Plain (Fig. 1B) (26).Thus, the Orangeburg Scarp is not a
good refer-ence for sea-level determinations for the Plio-cene.
Instead, we used the scarp as a marker forcharacterizing the
processes that have warped thecontinental margin subsequent to 4 to
3 millionyears ago (27).
To assess the processes responsible for thepost–mid-Pliocene
warping of this margin, wedeveloped a model of the Coastal Plain
that ac-counts for mantle dynamics (10) and glacial iso-static
adjustment (GIA) (28). Formation of karstscan also induce uplift
(29). However, becausecarbonates are scarce north of Florida, we
ignoredthis effect. Potential contributions from flexuralwarping
because of offshore sediment loadingand erosional unloading (7, 30)
were assessed(supplementary text) but were deemed too un-certain to
yield reliable estimates for the currentanalysis. In addition, it
is shown below that themajority of the warping can be accounted for
bydynamic topography and GIA alone.
Our analysis focused on the variably incised,mid-Pliocene,
low-relief flooding surface that char-acterizes the geomorphology
of the eastern sea-board coastward of theOrangeburg and
equivalentwave-cut scarps that define the landward edge ofthis
surface (Fig. 1A). The Orangeburg and cor-relative scarps would
have been horizontal at thetime of formation; the adjacent
mid-Pliocene shal-lowmarine rocks and associated flooding
surfacewould have been largely undissected and wouldhave sloped
gently eastward in a manner com-parable to the modern shallow
shelf. Therefore,the warping (Fig. 1B) and incision of this
low-relief flooding surface primarily reflects post–mid-Pliocene
relative uplift together with erosionaldown-cutting by rivers and
streams that traversethe eastern Coastal Plain. A reasonable test
of ourmodeling will be the retrodiction of this floodingsurface to
a configuration comparable to the mod-ern shelf.
We calculated global mantle convective flowby following the
approach of (10, 15, 31, 32)with the tomography models TX2007 (33)
andTX2008 (34), in which global seismic data to-gether with a range
of convection-related observ-ables (present-day surface topography,
free airgravity, plate velocities, and core-mantle bound-ary excess
ellipticity) were jointly inverted to yieldthe three-dimensional
(3D) distribution of densityin the mantle (34) that is consistent
with seismic,geodynamic, andmineral physics data. The under-lying
physical basis of this model is described indetail by Forte (35).
We considered two differentmodels of the radial distribution of
viscosity, V1and V2 (10, 31, 32), and these, together with thetwo
different inversions (TX2007 and TX2008)for mantle density, provide
four alternative mod-els for predictions of time varying dynamic
to-pography (see supplementary materials).
The 3D distribution of mantle buoyancy, whenintegrated with
estimates of the radial distribu-tion of viscosity, allows the
computation of theinstantaneous global flow field (31). With this
inhand, we iteratively computed a global backwardadvection solution
brought forward in timewith afull convection calculation to
estimate the verticalstresses acting on the base of the crust
arisingfrom flow in the mantle (10, 32). These time-dependent
vertical stresses generate a globally dis-tributed dynamic
topography that warps Earth’s
SE Georgia Embayment
SWGeorgia
Embayment
Charleston Embayment
AlbemarleEmbayment
SalisburyEmbayment
RaritanEmbayment
South NewJersey Arch
SouthFlorida
Embayment
40°
36°
32°
28°
84° 80° 76° 72°
0 20 40 (m)-40 -20Dynamic Topography Change Since 3 Ma
Fig. 2. Calculated dynamic topography change since 3 Ma.
Locations of features associated withEast Coast Coastal Plain
geology after (36). The Fall Zone marks the approximate landward
erosional edgeof the Early Cretaceous to Cenozoic Coastal Plain
strata. Color image is the distribution of retrodicteddynamic
topography change based on TX 2007 V2 results. Dashed gray
rectangular boxes outline theunderlying resolution of the Simmons
et al. (33, 34) joint seismic-geodynamic tomography inversion.
TheOrangeburg and correlative scarps pass over the center of the
maximum of retrodicted dynamictopography change since 3 Ma.
www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 340 28 JUNE 2013 1561
REPORTS
on
Janu
ary
24, 2
017
http
://sc
ienc
e.sc
ienc
emag
.org
/D
ownl
oade
d fr
om
http://science.sciencemag.org/
-
surface. The difference between the present-daydynamic
topography and estimates of past dy-namic topography yields the
change in dynam-ic topography as a function of time (Figs. 1 and2
and fig. S1). The variations in height of theOrangeburg Scarp and
related sediments (Fig. 1B)is well correlated, in latitude, with
our estimatesof the dynamic topography change since 3 mil-lion
years ago (Ma). Both are high in Florida, de-crease toward the
north in the Southeast GeorgiaEmbayment (~31°N), and then rise
again farthernorth in the vicinity of the Cape Fear, Neuse,
andNorfolk arches (Fig. 2).
The height of the Orangeburg Scarp risesmore quickly starting
north of 32°N than the es-timates of dynamic topography change
since 3Ma(fig. S1). We attribute this misfit primarily to
dif-ferences in the spatial scales of these data setsand to
uncertainties in the tomography-based flowcalculation. The joint
seismic-geodynamic con-strained tomography model has a minimum
hori-zontal spatial resolution of 270 km by 270 km(34) (Fig. 2). It
thus resolves mantle heteroge-neity on a length scale substantially
greater thanthe geological data being considered, whose var-iations
are known to less than a kilometer resolu-tion. In this regard, it
is important to emphasizethat our estimates of dynamic topography
changeare derived from full global mantle convectionsolutions and
have not been adjusted or in anyway tuned to yield better fits to
the observedwarping of the Orangeburg and correlative scarps.
Despite the longer-wavelength character ofthe seismic tomography
constrained mantle flowcalculations, there is a good spatial
correlationbetween the maxima of the estimated changes indynamic
topography since 3 Ma and relative in-cision of the mid-Pliocene
flooding surface (Fig.1). Regions in Georgia with limited
retrodictedchanges in dynamic topography are character-ized by
limited fluvial incision into this surface.In contrast, farther
north, where the retrodictedamplitude of dynamic topography change
in-creases, the intensity of dissection increases con-comitantly,
and both reach a maximum in thevicinity of Chesapeake Bay (Figs. 1
and 2). Theamount of incision of the low-relief floodingsurface is
about 50 T 10 m in this region, in ac-cord with the retrodicted
amplitude of dynamictopography change since 3 Ma. This impliesthat
a large fraction of the Coastal Plain geo-morphology, at least
shoreward of the Orange-burg Scarp, is a result of the interaction
betweenflooding-related planation and subsequent dy-namic
topography induced uplift and fluvialincision within the last 3
My.
The principal outstanding feature of the dy-namic topography
retrodictions is the pattern ofvariable uplift along the East Coast
of the UnitedStates (fig. S1). The origin of this uplift can
bedirectly traced to the existence of hot, buoyantmaterial in the
shallow (50 My) start-ing from the present, and thus anymisfit
withmore
Fig. 3. Retrodicted paleogeography of the Coastal Plain at 3 Ma.
Paleogeographic reconstructionof the eastern United States at 3 Ma.
Retrodicted topography from which differential dynamic to-pography
based on TX 2007 V2 results and a GIA signal have been subtracted.
Scale bar is in meters.No attempt has been made to remove effects
of subsequent river and stream incision. Thick dottedline is the
shoreline inferred geologically (23, 29) that essentially follows
the Orangeburg andcorrelative scarps. The thin blue line is the +25
m contour on the retrodicted topography. Blue dotsare locations for
which there are independent outcrop or borehole constraints on the
presence ofPliocene marine sediments. Blue stars in southern
Delaware and New Jersey are locations of Plioceneestuarine
sediments (38, 42).
28 JUNE 2013 VOL 340 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org1562
REPORTS
on
Janu
ary
24, 2
017
http
://sc
ienc
e.sc
ienc
emag
.org
/D
ownl
oade
d fr
om
http://science.sciencemag.org/
-
recent times (
-
originally published online May 16, 2013 (6140), 1560-1563.
[doi: 10.1126/science.1229180]340Science
2013) Mitrovica, Nathan A. Simmons and Stephen P. Grand (May 16,
David B. Rowley, Alessandro M. Forte, Robert Moucha, Jerry X.Since
3 Million Years AgoDynamic Topography Change of the Eastern United
States
Editor's Summary
years.mid-Atlantic and Southern United States coast varied by 60
meters or more during the past 5 millionpublished online 16 May)
used a model of flow in the mantle to show that the topography of
the
(p. 1560,et al.Rowley that the coastal plain has deformed in
response to flow in Earth's mantle. been used to infer changes in
global sea level through the Cenozoic. However, recent work has
shown
hasmostly to the weight of deposited sediments. As a result, the
fine-scale stratigraphy of the sediments The Atlantic coastal plain
of North America has been thought of as a passive margin,
responding
By the Sea Side
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.
Article Tools
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6140/1560article
tools: Visit the online version of this article to access the
personalization and
Permissionshttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlObtain
information about reproducing this article:
is a registered trademark of AAAS. ScienceAdvancement of
Science; all rights reserved. The title Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20005. Copyright 2016 by the American Association for thein
December, by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York
(print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published
weekly, except the last weekScience
on
Janu
ary
24, 2
017
http
://sc
ienc
e.sc
ienc
emag
.org
/D
ownl
oade
d fr
om
http://oascentral.sciencemag.org/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/sciencemag/cgi/reprint/L22/378385746/Top1/AAAS/PDF-Bio-Techne.com-WEBOE-W-009269/RNDsytems.raw/1?xhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6140/1560http://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://science.sciencemag.org/