HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED DEPOT ON GAT NO. 50/6A, 50/5B & 50/5A AT VILLAGE VARALE, TALEGAON, DIST. PUNE (M.S.) FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER - 2009 BY DBM GEOTECHNICS AND CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. B-301, Centaur House, 3 rd Floor, Shantinagar Industrial Estate, Vakola, Santacruz (E), Mumbai- 400 055 DBM ®
37
Embed
REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED DEPOT …tenders.hpcl.co.in/tenders/tender_prog/TenderFiles/3009/Tender/ETP... · REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
TABLE A 3 ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TEST LOCATIONS AND GROUND LEVELS
ERT NO. STRUCTURE COORDINATES
GROUND LEVEL(m)
X Y
ERT 1 Between Tank No.1 & 2 146.887 96.667 98.500
3
2.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface profile at this site generally consists of residual soils underlain by Bedrock.
Encountered soil/rock layers are described below;
LAYER I: RESIDUAL SOILS
Residual soils, consisting mostly of brown clay or sandy gravel, were encountered in the
boreholes. The lower boundary of this layer was encountered at depths between of 1.0m
and 2.0m below ground surface.
LAYER II: BASALT BEDROCK
Reddish Brown Basalt bedrock was encountered at depths between 1.0m and 2.0m below
ground surface in the boreholes. The bedrock was highly weathered to sound. Core
Recoveries varied between 9% and 94%, while Rock Quality Designation (RQD) ranged
between 0% and 84%. Compressive strength of the rock core sample ranged between 190
kg/cm2 and 958 kg/cm2. The boreholes were terminated in this bedrock layer at depths
between 3.0m and 6.0m below ground surface.
4
2.3 Ground water Levels
Groundwater accumulation in boreholes was monitored during and after completion of
drilling activities. No groundwater was observed in any of the boreholes. Seasonal and
annual fluctuations in ground water levels can be expected.
3.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
Weathered bedrock was encountered at depths between 1.0m and 2.0m below ground
surface. Spread/raft foundations for the proposed buildings and structures, supported on
this weathered bedrock, can be designed for a maximum net allowable bearing pressure of
40 t/m2.
Maximum settlement of foundations will be less than 10mm. A modulus of subgrade
reaction of 4,000 t/m3 can be utilized for design of foundations. Excavation sides should be
sloped at a maximum slope of 1:1 (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. Excavated soils are suitable
for use as footing backfill.
Proposed tanks exerting pressures of up to 22 t/m2 can be supported directly at or near the
existing ground surface. However, existing soils beneath tanks should be completely
removed for a depth of 1.0m and replaced with well compacted soils. Existing granular soils
5
(predominantly sand) at this site can be utilized as the replacement compacted fill.
Compacted fill should be placed in accordance with Section 3.3 of this report entitled
“Compacted Fill”.
3.1 Foundation Protection
A ‘mild’ Exposure Condition was assigned to this site. Therefore only following normal
precautions are recommended to protect subsurface concrete and reinforcement.
Type of Cement: OPC or PPC
Minimum Grade of Reinforced Concrete: M20
Minimum Cement Content for spread footings: 300 kg/m3
Maximum Water Cement Ratio: 0.50
Minimum Cover to Reinforcement: 50mm
3.2 Floor Slab or Pavements
The existing soils encountered at this site are capable of providing support for proposed floor
slabs and pavements. Areas to receive fill should be proof rolled with heavy equipment or
dump trucks to delineate zones of any loose or soft soils, which may require additional
removal and compaction. Based on borehole data, a minimum California Bearing Ratio
6
(CBR) value of 5 can be used for design of pavements installed at or near existing ground
surface.
3.3 Compacted Fill
Any existing surface vegetation should be removed from the area prior to any site grading.
Compacted fill beneath pavements/floor slabs or steel tanks or for site grading, should
consist of non-expansive soil, free of organics and rubble. As mentioned previously, a
minimum of 1m of existing soils should be removed beneath tanks and replaced with
compacted fill. On-site granular soils (sand) can be utilized as replacement compacted fill.
Compaction of granular soils to the recommended degree of compaction can generally be
attained with vibratory compaction equipment. Proper compaction of cohesive soils can be
achieved with pneumatic type compactors under optimum moisture conditions. Fill should
be placed in loose lifts of maximum thickness of 250mm and compacted to a minimum of 95
percent of its maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor Test.
3.4 Electrical Resistivity Tests
One Electrical Resistivity test (ERT-1) were completed at this site. Results of the test are
enclosed in the Annexure. Soil resistivities were ranged between 18.378 ohm-m and 89.064
ohm-m.
7
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
The sub-surface investigation was completed generally as per IS: 1892-1979. The field
investigation was carried out using a rotary machine. Casing was used to support sides of
borehole until sufficiently stiff strata was encountered. Standard Penetration Tests (i.e.
SPT) were carried out in soil in accordance with IS 2131-1981. Using this procedure, a 2”
outside diameter split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil by 63.5 kg. weight falling through
75 cm height. After an initial set of 15cm, the number of blows required to drive the sampler
an additional 30 cm, is known as the “penetration resistance” or “N value”.
When SPT refusal was obtained in hard strata, rock coring was done using diamond bit and
double tube core barrel to obtain rock samples. Percent Rock Core Recovery and Rock
Quality Designation (%RQD) were determined. % RQD = 100 x Sum of length of rock
pieces in cms, each having lengths greater than 10cms/Total length of core run.
Sincerely,
DBM GEOTECHNICS AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. __________________________________ Jaydeep Wagh B.E., M.S., P.E. (Geotechnical)
REFERENCES
1) Foundation Analysis and Design, J.E. Bowles, McGraw Hill Publication, 5
th Edition, 1996.
2) Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 3) Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 2
nd Edition, Terzaghi K. and Peck R. B., John
Willey and Sons, 1967. 4) Foundation Design Manual, N. V. Nayak, 5
th Edition, 1996.
5) IS:6403-1981, Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Shallow Foundations on
Soils.
9
SAMPLE CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY FOR FOUNDATIONS ON WEATHERED BEDROCK
________________________________________________ GL +0.0m Layer I, Residual soils (Sand or Clay) ________________________________________________ -1.0m to -2m Layer II, Weathered Basalt Bedrock (Assuming weathered Bedrock to be a very dense granular soil.)
Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity = qu = cNc + q (Nq – 1) + 0.5 B γNγ sγ (Refn. 5, Table 4-1) Where, q = Overburden Pressure (i.e. submerged unit weight x depth of foundation) c = Cohesion B = Minimum Width of foundation = 1m
γ’ = submerged unit weight of soil = 0.80
Nc, Nq, Nγ = Terzaghi’s Bearing capacity factors
Sc, sq, sγ = Shape factors = Assumed as 1.3, 1.2, and 0.8 D = Minimum Depth of Footing = 1.0m Minimum SPT N value obtained in boreholes = 50 Corresponding friction angle = 40
o (Reference No. 5)
Corresponding Nc=75, Nq=64, Nγ=109 (Reference 5, IS:6403-1981); Substituting these values in the above equation; q ultimate =qu =[0x75x1.3]+[1.0x0.8x(64-1)x1.2]+[0.5x1x0.8x109x0.8]= 0+60+37 = 97 t/m
2
q safe = qu/F.S. = 97/2.5 = 40 t/m2
10
CALCULATION OF SETTLEMENTS OF FOUNDATIONS (3M X 3M) EXERTING PRESSURE OF 40 T/M2:
From Reference No. 1:
Settlement = S q BE
mI Is
s f=−
0
21
'µ
Where, q0 = Footing Pressure = 40 t/m2 B’ = B/2 (Where B is the width of pressure distribution µ = Poisson’s ratio = 0.3 E = Modulus of Elasticity Is = Influence Factor (Obtained from Table 5-2, Reference No. 1) If = Depth Factor (Obtained from Figure 5-7, Reference No. 1)
m = 4 for center of footing
Very conservatively assuming weathered bedrock within the full influence zone of footings: E value for over-consolidated sand = 105(N)+4000 (Reference No. 1) Therefore, for a SPT N value of 50, E=9,250 t/m2
L’ = 3/2 =1.50, B’ = 3/2 = 1.5, H=6m, and D=1.0m Therefore, M=L/B=1; and N=H/B’=4 and D/B=0.33
Corresponding, Is = 0.43, Conservative If = 1.0 (From Table 5-2, Reference 1)
Settlement of Layer = S1 = 0.143.049250
3.015.140
2
xxxxx−
= 0.011m = 11mm
From IS8009: Due to Footing Rigidity Factor, Settlement = 0.8 x 11mm = 9mm Therefore, Total Settlement = 9mm
Date
:09.0
9.2
009
Bitum
en T
ank N
o.
1 &
2C
urr
en
t : 7
Am
p
X 1
46.8
877
Vo
ltag
e :
50 V
Y 9
6.6
773
98.5
00m
.
Wenners
Four
Pin
Equal P
robe S
pacin
g.
Field
Reading
R ( N - S )
Field
Reading
R ( NE - SW )
Field
Reading
R ( E - W )
Field
Reading
R ( SE - NW )
mo
hm
oh
mo
hm
oh
mo
hm
oh
mo
hm
oh
mo
hm
oh
m -
m
11
.00
.03
11
00
3.1
00
.02
61
00
2.6
00
.03
21
00
3.2
00
.02
81
00
2.8
02
.93
18
.37
8
22
.00
.02
71
00
2.7
00
.02
11
00
2.1
00
.02
61
00
2.6
00
.02
31
00
2.3
02
.43
30
.47
3
33
.00
.02
31
00
2.3
00
.01
91
00
1.9
00
.02
41
00
2.4
00
.02
10
02
.00
2.1
54
0.5
27
44
.00
.02
11
00
2.1
00
.01
71
00
1.7
00
.02
21
00
2.2
00
.01
81
00
1.8
01
.95
49
.00
9
55
.00
.01
91
00
1.9
00
.01
81
00
1.8
00
.02
01
00
2.0
00
.01
61
00
1.6
01
.83
57
.33
4
66
.00
.01
71
00
1.7
00
.01
61
00
1.6
00
.01
81
00
1.8
00
.01
81
00
1.8
01
.73
65
.03
1
77
.00
.01
61
00
1.6
00
.01
71
00
1.7
00
.01
91
00
1.9
00
.01
61
00
1.6
01
.70
74
.77
0
88
.00
.01
41
00
1.4
00
.01
51
00
1.5
00
.01
61
00
1.6
00
.01
31
00
1.3
01
.45
72
.88
5
99
.00
.01
61
00
1.6
00
.01
41
00
1.4
00
.01
71
00
1.7
00
.01
61
00
1.6
01
.58
89
.06
4
10
10
.00
.01
31
00
1.3
00
.01
21
00
1.2
00
.01
51
00
1.5
00
.01
41
00
1.4
01
.35
84
.82
3
Apparent Soil
Resistivity
ρρρρ = 2 ππππ a R
Dir
ecti
on
- S
E-N
W
Jo
b N
o.
:2
24
0D
BM
GE
OT
EC
HN
ICS
& C
ON
ST
RU
CT
ION
S P
VT
. L
TD
.
Range
Range
Range
Electrode
Spacing, a
Sr.
No
R (Average)
Dir
ecti
on
- E
- W
Lo
cati
on
:
Range
Dir
ecti
on
- N
- S
Dir
ecti
on
- N
E -
SWEL
EC
TR
ICA
L R
ES
IST
IVIT
Y T
ES
T
Red
uced
Level
:
Su
rvey M
eth
od
:
Pro
ject
:
Geo
tech
nic
al
Investi
gati
on
Fo
r P
rop
osed
Dep
ot
On
Gat
No
. 50/6
A,
50 /
5B
& 5
0/5
A a
t V
illa
ge V
ara
le,
Tale
gao
n D
ist.
Pu
ne
(M.S
.)E
RT
1
Co
ord
inate
:
Test
No
.
:
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10
.0
11
.0
12
.0
02
04
06
08
01
00
Depth (m)
Ap
pa
ren
t S
oil R
es
isti
vit
y (
oh
m-m
)
----
-D
AT
E:
Wet Density
Dry Density
Gravel %
Sand %
Silt %
Clay %
Liquid %
Plastic %
Plasticity Index,
Ip %
Type
Cohesion Cu
kg/cm2
Degree φ
Comp. Index
Ccv (Lab)
Initial Void
Ratio
BH
- 0
10.
00 -
0.3
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--S
C8
4523
2442
2418
13 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
65
BH
- 0
20.
00 -
0.3
5D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--C
I5
3432
2948
2622
12 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
64
BH
- 0
30.
00 -
0.6
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--S
M21
52 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
66
BH
- 0
40.
00 -
0.5
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--C
H3
2434
3954
2727
14 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
63
BH
- 0
41.
00 -
1.4
5S
PT
1 -
----
---
-- -
----
GM
4840
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--
CH
EM
:T
uu
:
Tri
ax
ial
Tes
t (
Un
con
soli
da
ted
Un
dra
ined
)S
P
:
Sw
elli
ng
Pre
ssu
re o
r S
wel
lin
g P
ote
nti
al
Tes
tA
ng
le o
f In
tern
al
Fri
ctio
n
CO
MP
:
Tcu
:
Tri
ax
ial
Tes
t (
Co
nso
lid
ate
d U
nd
rain
ed )
SP
T
:S
tan
da
rd P
enet
rati
on
Tes
t S
am
ple
Un
dra
ined
Co
hes
ion
DS
:T
cd
:T
ria
xia
l T
est
( C
on
soli
da
ted
Dra
ined
)U
DS
:
Un
dis
turb
ed S
oil
Sa
mp
leE
ffec
tiv
e A
ng
le o
f In
tern
al
Fri
ctio
n
K
:
NP
:N
on
Pla
stic
VL
:L
ab
ora
tory
Va
ne
Sh
ear
Tes
tE
ffec
tiv
e C
oh
esio
n
FS
I
:S
L
:
Sh
rik
ag
e L
imit
Tes
tU
C
:
Un
con
fin
ed C
om
pre
ssio
n T
est
Co
mb
ined
Sil
t +
Cla
y
Per
mea
bil
ity
Tes
t
Ch
emic
al
An
aly
sis
2240
Job
. N
o.
:
Fre
e S
wel
l T
est
Remarks
Ve
rica
l
Co
nso
lid
ati
on
12.0
9.20
09
Shrinkage Limit %
Tri
ax
ial
Te
st
C
on
sist
an
cy
Lim
its
Soil Classification (I.S)
Depth in m.
Sample Type
UD / D
SO
IL T
ES
T D
AT
A S
HE
ET
DB
M G
EO
TE
CH
NIC
S &
CO
NS
TR
UC
TIO
NS
PV
T. L
TD
.
Co
mp
act
ion
Tes
t
Dir
ect
Sh
ear
De
nsi
ty
gm
/ cm
3 M
ech
an
ica
l A
na
lysi
s
Lo
cati
on
:
Bore Hole No.
Natural Moisture
Content, w %
27 12
Specific Gravity
Pro
ject
:F
LB
04
Geo
tech
nic
al
Inv
est
igati
on
fo
r P
rop
ose
d D
ep
ot
at
Vil
lag
e V
ara
le,
Tale
gao
n.
Unconfined
Compression Test
Kg/cm2
Part
icle
%%
%%
mm
mm
mm
BH
- 0
10.
00 -
0.3
0S
C8
4523
24 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
4224
18D
S 1
BH
- 0
20.
00 -
0.3
5C
I5
3432
29 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
4826
22D
S 1
BH
- 0
30.
00 -
0.6
0S
M21
52 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--D
S 1
BH
- 0
40.
00 -
0.5
0C
H3
2434
39 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
5427
27D
S 1
BH
- 0
41.
00 -
1.4
5G
M48
40 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--S
PT
1Liquid
Limit, Wl
φφφφ10%
φφφφ30%
Co
eff.
of
Un
ifo
rmit
y,
Cu
= D
60 /
D1
0
Co
eff.
Of
Cu
rva
ture
Cc
D3
02/(
D6
0*D
10)
Gra
v
el
San
d
DBM GEOTECHNICS & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
Siz
e(m
m)
Dep
th i
n m
.
Plasticity
Index, Ip
Cla
y
Sil
t
φφφφ60%
Plastic
Limit, Wp
Bo
re
Ho
le
No
.
Sy
mb
o
l
Job No. :
Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Depot at Village Varale, Talegaon.
Cla
ssif
i-
-cati
on
( IS
)
Remarks
Project :
2240
-----
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
Location :
1227
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10
0
0.0
00
10
.00
10
.01
0.1
11
0
PERCENTAGE FINER THAN
PA
RT
ICL
E S
IZE
( m
m )
GR
AV
EL
FC
SA
ND
CM
FS
ILT
CL
AY
80
.0
20
.0
4.7
5
2.0
0
0.4
25
7
5x1
0-3
2x1
0-3
FC
SA
ND
FCC
Part
icle
%%
%%
mm
mm
mm
BH
- 0
50.
00 -
0.4
0C
I2
3530
33 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
4927
22D
S 1
BH
- 0
60.
00 -
0.3
0S
M40
45 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--D
S 1
BH
- 0
70.
00 -
0.2
0C
H5
2333
39 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
5628
28D
S 1
BH
- 0
80.
00 -
0.5
0G
M51
32 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--D
S 1
17
-----
Remarks
Project :
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
Location :
2240
Bo
re
Ho
le
No
.
Sy
mb
o
l
Job No. :
Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Depot at Village Varale, Talegaon.
Cla
ssif
i-
-cati
on
( IS
)
Gra
v
el
San
d
DBM GEOTECHNICS & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
Siz
e(m
m)
Dep
th i
n m
.
Plasticity
Index, Ip
Cla
y
15
Sil
t
φφφφ60%
Plastic
Limit, Wp
Liquid
Limit, Wl
φφφφ10%
φφφφ30%
Co
eff.
of
Un
ifo
rmit
y,
Cu
= D
60 /
D1
0
Co
eff.
Of
Cu
rva
ture
Cc
D3
02/(
D6
0*D
10)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10
0
0.0
00
10
.00
10
.01
0.1
11
0
PERCENTAGE FINER THAN
PA
RT
ICL
E S
IZE
( m
m )
GR
AV
EL
FC
SA
ND
CM
FS
ILT
CL
AY
80
.0
20
.0
4.7
5
2.0
0
0.4
25
7
5x1
0-3
2x1
0-3
FC
SA
ND
FCC
----
-D
AT
E:
Wet Density
Dry Density
Gravel %
Sand %
Silt %
Clay %
Liquid %
Plastic %
Plasticity Index,
Ip %
Type
Cohesion Cu
kg/cm2
Degree φ
Comp. Index
Ccv (Lab)
Initial Void
Ratio
BH
- 0
50.
00 -
0.4
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--C
I2
3530
3349
2722
13 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
64
BH
- 0
60.
00 -
0.3
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--S
M40
45 -
----
---
-- -
----
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
2.66
BH
- 0
70.
00 -
0.2
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--C
H5
2333
3956
2828
14 -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2.
63
BH
- 0
80.
00 -
0.5
0D
S 1
---
-- -
----
---
--G
M51
32 -
----
---
-- -
----
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
2.66
CH
EM
:T
uu
:
Tri
ax
ial
Tes
t (
Un
con
soli
da
ted
Un
dra
ined
)S
P
:
Sw
elli
ng
Pre
ssu
re o
r S
wel
lin
g P
ote
nti
al
Tes
tA
ng
le o
f In
tern
al
Fri
ctio
n
CO
MP
:
Tcu
:
Tri
ax
ial
Tes
t (
Co
nso
lid
ate
d U
nd
rain
ed )
SP
T
:S
tan
da
rd P
enet
rati
on
Tes
t S
am
ple
Un
dra
ined
Co
hes
ion
DS
:T
cd
:T
ria
xia
l T
est
( C
on
soli
da
ted
Dra
ined
)U
DS
:
Un
dis
turb
ed S
oil
Sa
mp
leE
ffec
tiv
e A
ng
le o
f In
tern
al
Fri
ctio
n
K
:
NP
:N
on
Pla
stic
VL
:L
ab
ora
tory
Va
ne
Sh
ear
Tes
tE
ffec
tiv
e C
oh
esio
n
FS
I
:S
L
:
Sh
rik
ag
e L
imit
Tes
tU
C
:
Un
con
fin
ed C
om
pre
ssio
n T
est
Co
mb
ined
Sil
t +
Cla
y
17
Shrinkage Limit %
Tri
ax
ial
Te
st
Natural Moisture
Content, w %
FL
B 0
4G
eo
tech
nic
al
Inv
est
igati
on
fo
r P
rop
ose
d D
ep
ot
at
Vil
lag
e V
ara
le,
Tale
gao
n.
Unconfined
Compression Test
Kg/cm2
Co
nsi
sta
ncy
Lim
its
Soil Classification (I.S)
Depth in m.
Sample Type
UD / D
SO
IL T
ES
T D
AT
A S
HE
ET
Pro
ject
:
DB
M G
EO
TE
CH
NIC
S &
CO
NS
TR
UC
TIO
NS
PV
T. L
TD
.
Co
mp
act
ion
Tes
t
Dir
ect
Sh
ear
De
nsi
ty
gm
/ cm
3 M
ech
an
ica
l A
na
lysi
s
2240
Job
. N
o.
:
Fre
e S
wel
l T
est
Remarks
Ve
rica
l
Co
nso
lid
ati
on
Per
mea
bil
ity
Tes
t
Ch
emic
al
An
aly
sis
Specific Gravity
15
Lo
cati
on
:
Bore Hole No.
16.0
9.20
09
----
-D
AT
E:
Gravel %
Sand %
Silt %
Clay %
Liquid %
Plastic %
Plasticity Index,
Ip %
Type
Cohesion Cu
kg/cm2
Degree φ
Comp. Index
Ccv (Lab)
Initial Void
Ratio
TP
-01
0.3
0D
S 1
1.6
02
0.4
0 -
----
CH
21
04
14
76
42
93
51
40
.55
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
2.6
2
TP
-02
0.5
0D
S 1
2.0
21
0.2
0 -
----
GP
93
3--
----
----
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--2
.68
CH
EM
:T
uu
:
Tri
axia
l T
est
( U
nco
nso
lid
ated
Un
dra
ined
)S
P
:
Sw
elli
ng
Pre
ssu
re o
r S
wel
lin
g P
ote
nti
al T
est
An
gle
of
Inte
rnal
Fri
ctio
n
CO
MP
:
Tcu
:
Tri
axia
l T
est
( C
on
soli
dat
ed U
nd
rain
ed )
SP
T
:S
tan
dar
d P
enet
rati
on
Tes
t S
amp
leU
nd
rain
ed C
oh
esio
n
DS
:T
cd
:T
riax
ial
Tes
t (
Co
nso
lid
ated
Dra
ined
)U
DS
:
Un
dis
turb
ed S
oil
Sam
ple
Eff
ecti
ve
An
gle
of
Inte
rnal
Fri
ctio
n
K
:
NP
:N
on
Pla
stic
VL
:L
abo
rato
ry V
ane
Sh
ear
Tes
tE
ffec
tiv
e C
oh
esio
n
FS
I
:S
L
:
Sh
rik
age
Lim
it T
est
UC
:U
nco
nfi
ned
Co
mp
ress
ion
Tes
t C
om
bin
ed S
ilt
+ C
lay
FL
B 0
4G
eo
tech
nic
al
Inv
est
iga
tio
n f
or
Pro
po
sed
De
po
t a
t V
illa
ge
Va
rale
, Ta
leg
ao
n.
Unconfined
Compression Test
Kg/cm2
DB
M G
EO
TE
CH
NIC
S &
CO
NS
TR
UC
TIO
NS
PV
T.
LT
D.
Co
mp
acti
on
Tes
t
Dir
ect
Sh
ear
Mech
an
ical
An
aly
sis
Lo
cati
on
:
C
on
sist
an
cy
Lim
its
Soil Classification (I.S)
Depth in m.
Sample Type
UD / D
Pro
ject
:
22
40
Job
. No
. :
Fre
e S
wel
l T
est
Remarks
Veri
cal
Co
nso
lid
ati
on
Per
mea
bil
ity
Tes
t
Ch
emic
al
An
aly
sis
4
Natural Moisture
Content, w %
Specific Gravity
Shrinkage Limit %
16
.09
.20
09
Swelling Pressure
kg/cm2
Tri
axia
l T
est
Optimum Moisture
Content %
Maximum Dry
Density
SO
IL T
ES
T D
AT
A S
HE
ET
Bore Hole No.
Pa
rtic
le
%%
%%
mm
mm
mm
TP
-01
0.3
0C
H2
10
41
47
---
-- -
----
---
-- -
----
---
--6
42
93
5D
S 1
TP
-02
0.5
0G
P9
33
5.1
71
1.5
2.2
50
.84
----
----
----
DS
1
2240
Sy
mb
o
l
Job No. :
Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Depot at Village Varale, Talegaon.
DBM GEOTECHNICS & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
Siz
e(m
m)
De
pth
in
m.
Plasticity
Index, Ip
Cla
y
Sil
t
φφφφ60%
Bo
re
Ho
le
No
.
Plastic
Limit, Wp
Remarks
-----
Gra
v
el
Sa
nd
Project :
Cla
ssif
i-
-ca
tio
n
( IS
)
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE
Location :
4
Liquid
Limit, Wl
φφφφ10%
φφφφ30%
Co
eff.
of
Un
ifo
rmit
y, C
u
= D
60 /
D10
Co
eff.
Of
Cu
rvat
ure
Cc
D3
02/(
D6
0*D
10)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.0
00
10
.00
10
.01
0.1
11
0
PERCENTAGE FINER THAN
PA
RT
ICL
E S
IZE
( m
m )
GR
AV
EL
FC
SA
ND
CM
FS
ILT
CL
AY
80
.0
20
.0
4.7
5
2.0
0
0.4
25
7
5x1
0-3
2x10
-3
FC
SA
ND
FCC
Date : 16.09.09
Project :
Location : TP - 01
Depth : 0.30 Weight of Hammer : 4.89 kg
Reduced Level : ------ Height of Fall : 45 cm
Type of Test : Modified Proctor Test No. of Layers : 5
Observation Table
Rammer
Job. No. :
Chekd. By :
6
Dry Density
gm / cm3
4
27.80
1.600
1.49
Maximum Dry Density ( gm / cm3
) :
1
23.90
5
3
PROCTOR DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Geo. Investigation for Proposed Depot at Village Varale, Talegaon.