J. Kaminski IEKP, Karlsruhe Report on a test beam with a GEM-TPC at CERN and on a high magnetic field test at DESY ICLC Paris, 21/04/2004 J. Kaminski a , M. Ball b , M. Janssen b,c , S. Kappler a,d , B. Ledermann a , Th. Müller a , M. Ronan e , P. Wienemann b a IEKP, Karlsruhe b DESY, Hamburg c University of Dortmund d CERN, Geneva e LBNL, Berkeley
16
Embed
Report on a test beam with a GEM-TPC at CERN and on a high ...ilctpc/kaminski_paris_2004.pdf · J. Kaminski IEKP, Karlsruhe Report on a test beam with a GEM-TPC at CERN and on a high
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Report on a test beam with a GEM-TPC at CERN and on a high magnetic field test at DESY
Magnet at Hamburgsuper conducting magnet (up to 5.5T)solenoidal fielddiameter of bore: 28cmlength: 186cm
scintillator 2
scintillator 1
µ
25cm
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Enlargement of clusters due to diffusion
ma gnet isch e In duk tion in T0 1 2 3 4 5
intrinsische C
lusterbreite in
µm
010 0
20 030 040 0
50 060 0
Ar : CH4 95-5B = 0T Edrift = 95V/cmDtrans = 726.0 µm/ √c m
Ar : CH4 : CO2 93-5-2B = 5T Edrift = 240V/cmDtrans = 72.6 µm/ √c m
Ar : CH4 : CO2 93-5-2B = 0T Edrift = 240V/cmDtrans = 476.5 µm/ √c m
(diffusion coefficients calculated with Magboltz)
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
diffusion coefficient in dependence of magnetic field
Intrinsic enlargement of cluster width by GEMs and transfer/induction field
B = 2T
squared cluster width versus drift distance
Diffusion coefficientin dependence of magnetic field
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Transversal spatial resolutionTransversal spatial resolution σs p res was determined from width of residuals:σ 2
res = σ2sp res + σ 2
track => with approximation σ2track = σ 2
res/N
The transv. spatial resolution is limited by diffusion for long drift distances and low magnetic fields.
For short drift distances and high magnetic fields the cluster width becomes so small that the number of pads hit above noise is insufficient for the reconstruction algorithm (COG) and the spatial resolution worsens.
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Transversal spatial resolution in dependence of different parameters at B = 4T
D rifts treck e in cm2 4 6 81 01 214 16 182 02 224
Ortsauflösung
in µm
0204060801 001 201 401 601 80 4.0°Wink el = 2.0°1.0°0.57°Wink el =Wink el =Wink el =
D rifts treck e in cm2 4 6 81 01 214 16 182 02 224
Ortsauflösung
in µm
020
4060
801 001 201 401 601 80 4.0°Wink el = 2.0°1.0°0.57°Wink el =Wink el =Wink el =
D rifts treck e in cm2 4 6 81 01 214 16 182 02 224
Ortsauflösung
in µm
020
4060
801 001 201 401 601 80 4.0°Wink el = 2.0°1.0°0.57°Wink el =Wink el =Wink el =
transv. spatial resolution versus effective gas gain
transv. spatial resolution versus inclination
of track
transv. spatial resolution versus drift distance and
inclination of track
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Longitudinal spatial resolutionCalculation of long. spatial resolution analogous to the transv. s. r.
Dlong = 297µm/ √c m - MagboltzAt drift distance of 23 cm:1.42mm = 31.6ns=> Basically one time slice hit=> Improvement with longer drift distances
Degradation of spatial resolution with higher magnetic fields: since transversal cluster width decreases and thus the time information of less pads contributes to the cluster reconstruction (COG).
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Longitudinal spatial resolution in dependence of different parameters
long. spatial resolution in dependence of gas amplification
long. spatial resolution in dependence of track inclination
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
Combined results of spatial resolution study
All cluster sizes are determined by Magboltz diffusion coefficients and actual drift distance.
J. KaminskiIEKP, Karlsruhe
ConclusionDetector was tested in a high rate hadronic beam and high magnetic fields
=> no problems were observedSame GEMs are still working after 6 trips of 500 km inside the detector and being operated in 3 different experimental environments.
Transversal and longitudinal spatial resolutions were studied under various conditions. The smallest resolutions reached were:test beam: 62µm transversally and 59µm longitudinally
OutlookFurther tests at the magnet and the test beam are intended:•for higher statistics•test different readout designs•stability tests
AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank:R. Heuer und R. Settles for their support and adviceM. Hauschild (CERN) for discussions and supporting this projectM. Van Stenis (CERN) and T. Barvich (Karlsruhe) for building
the detector and parts of the equipmentL. Durieu (CERN) and the CERN PS-TeamThe FLC-group at DESY for their help with the magnet