Report on 2014 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists and Engineers Too’ Module and the Archaeology Field Workshop Zachary Singer Mandy Ranslow 4/3/2015
33
Embed
Report on 2014 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Report on 2014 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut, Mansfield,
Connecticut Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State Museum of Natural
History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists and Engineers Too’ Module and the Archaeology Field Workshop
Zachary Singer Mandy Ranslow
4/3/2015
2
Introduction
In the spring of 2014 the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), in accordance with
Connecticut General Statute 10-386, approved archaeological investigations of the Farwell
House site (78-184). The archaeological excavations were conducted as a one-week module of
the Kids Are Scientists and Engineers Too (KASET) program at the University of Connecticut
(UConn) and as a half-day Archaeology Field Workshop (AFW) session. The goal of the
KASET archaeological field school module is to teach fifth through tenth grade students
archaeological field methods and the importance of historic preservation. Since 2004, the
KASET program (formerly Kids Are Scientists Too or KAST) has trained youths in historical
research techniques, archaeological excavation techniques, and laboratory processing techniques.
Incorporating information from previous investigations of the Farwell House enriches the
KASET archaeology module by allowing new excavations to build on prior knowledge (Grady
1977, Benard 2007, Thompson 2007, Ranslow and Cruz 2014). KASET excavations at the
Farwell House Site were conducted from July 7-11, 2014. The AFW, which has excavated at the
Farwell House since 2011, was sponsored by the Connecticut State Museum of Natural History
(CSMNH) on October 20, 2014. This program teaches archaeology field methods to adults and
children in a half-day session. All artifacts from both the 2014 KASET and AFW excavations
are stored with the previously excavated Farwell House material at the Office of State
Archaeology’s storage facility at UConn, Storrs, Connecticut.
3
Farwell House Site (78-184)
The Farwell House Site is located on the Tolland/Storrs town line at the north intersection
of Horsebarn Hill Road and Route 195 (Storrs Road) (Figure 1). The Farwell House was likely
built by John Farwell before 1756 as part of a larger family farm complex (Cazel n.d.: 1) (Figure
2). Archaeological evidence suggests that the Farwell House was constructed on top of the
remains of a house built in 1710 (Gradie, personal communication to Ranslow, 2012). The
Farwell House had a 40x32 foot fieldstone foundation with a 17x7 foot rear addition and a six
foot deep cellar in the southern third of the house. The house had three brick chimneys with
ceramic casings (Poirier 2002). Members of the Farwell family occupied the Farwell House until
1908 when the property was sold to George Jacobson. Jacobson owned the estate until 1911
when he sold it to the State of Connecticut. The State of Connecticut and UConn have
maintained and used the former Farwell property since 1911.
In 1976, UConn approved a fire training exercise to burn down the Farwell House due to
financial considerations related to the continued upkeep of the House (UConn House 1976: 1).
The Mansfield Historical Society objected to UConn demolishing the historic Farwell property,
consequently SHPO recommended measures to preserve and conserve the remnants of the site as
a historic archaeological resource (Gradie 1977). Presently, the only visible evidence of the
former Farwell House is a mound where the cellar hole was filled with dirt.
4
Figure 1: Location of Farwell House (Courtesy of US Census)
Figure 2: Undated Photo of the Farwell House
5
Previous Work
Several archaeologists have excavated the Farwell House site since 1976. Robert Gradie
conducted the initial archaeological survey of the Farwell House remains after the House was
burned (Gradie 1977:3). In December 1976 Gradie excavated a ten foot square unit to document
the structure. In April and May 1977 Gradie supervised further archaeological work to produce a
map of the house site and reconstruct the layout of the first floor (Gradie 1977:5). Gradie’s
investigations indicate that the Farwell House was constructed over at least three separate
building periods (Gradie 1977:12). After Gradie’s excavations, the cellar hole was filled in and
the site has since been preserved for its contributions to local history and the understanding of
colonial history in eastern Connecticut.
Scant information is available describing the excavations of the Farwell House that were
conducted after Gradie’s initial 1977 report until the 2006 field season. There are no available
reports for the excavations at the Farwell House from 1979 to 2005. Excavations were
undertaken by Gradie in 1976, 1977, 1979-1981, and the mid-1980’s (Gradie, personal
communication to Ranslow, 2012). All paperwork and artifacts were stored at the State
Archaeologist’s storage facilities located at UConn. Early field reports were given to the State
Archaeologist and UConn’s Office of Finance and Administration and recent field reports are
filed with SHPO and the CSMNH.
Excavations took place within the foundation and to the north of the foundation in 1976-
1977 (Gradie, personal communication to Ranslow, 2012). Artifacts from excavations
conducted between 1979 and 1981 were found in storage and subsequently inventoried and
added to the master database created in 2010. These are the only artifacts recovered prior to
6
2006 that have been located thus far. Unfortunately, no paperwork accompanied the rediscovered
artifacts. The provenience information on the rediscovered bags suggests that the units were
located to the south of the foundation, which is problematic because Horsebarn Hill Road is
located to the south of the foundation where the units were supposedly located. It is likely that a
different grid was employed for the 1979-1981 excavations. In 2004 and 2005, Gradie led
KAST excavations, which consisted of 5x5 meter excavations units located on the east side of
the foundation. The exact location of these units is unknown.
In 2006, Kristina Thompson (2007:3) excavated three 1x1 meter units to the northeast of
the buried foundation (Units: N0E0, N0E2, N1E1) (Figure 3). The soil was identified as
historically disturbed. Artifacts recovered during Thompson’s excavations indicate that a refuse
area was discovered where household waste and building materials were previously discarded
(Thompson 2007:3). The majority of the artifacts recovered by Thompson date to the 20th
century indicating that this area was not related to the historic occupations of the Farwell House,
but provides evidence of modern use of the Farwell House prior to the House’s destruction
(Thompson 2007:5).
In 2007, Akeia Benard excavated additional 1x1 meter units in the same area that
Thompson investigated in 2006 (Units: N0E1, N1E0, and N1E2) (Figure 3) (Benard 2007:2).
Benard recovered similar data as Thompson, which suggested that the soil was disturbed and that
the artifacts relate to 20th
century disposal of household waste and building materials (Benard
2007:3).
In 2008, Heather Cowan Cruz placed 1x1 meter units west of the 2006 and 2007
excavations, in an area then designated Locus A (Units: S2W6, S1W5, and N0W6) (Figure 3)
7
(Cruz 2009:3). Recovered artifacts consisted of household waste and building materials (Cruz
2009:5).
In 2009, Cruz moved excavations to the west of the foundation mound, which was
designated Locus B (Cruz 2010:3). A new datum was established for Locus B, and three 1x1
meter units were excavated (Units: N0E0, N1W1, and N2E0) (Figure 3) (Cruz 2010:5). Locus B
excavations uncovered evidence of a possible walkway or garden boundary. Discarded artifacts
in Locus B suggest that a door and front window were located in this area (Cruz 2010:6).
In 2010, Mandy Ranslow excavated three 1x1 meter units (Units: S1W15, S1W17, and
S2W16) (Figure 3) based on a new datum (Ranslow & Cruz 2011:9). Architectural and domestic
artifacts were recovered, many of which were burned and melted, thus providing evidence of the
house’s destruction. Large quantities of melted glass, burned wood, and nails suggest a window
was located in proximity to the excavation units (Ranslow & Cruz 2011:14). 19th
century
domestic artifacts were recovered from deeper levels of the units, which are related to the
occupation of the house by the Farwell family.
In 2011, Mandy Ranslow and the KAST field school excavated three 1x1 meter units on
the northwest side of the foundation (Units: S1W16, S2W15, and S2W17) (Figure 3), which
would have been the front yard of the Farwell House (Ranslow and Cruz 2012). Ranslow and the
AFW excavated three 50x50 centimeter test pits (TPs: N5W5, N5W10, & N5W15) placed at five
meter intervals to the north of the foundation, which would have been the side yard of the house.
The 2011 excavations recovered architectural and domestic artifacts primarily related to the 20th
century use of the Farwell House. Many of the artifacts were burned providing evidence of the
1976 burning of the Farwell House. Probable 19th
century artifacts were recovered below 20th
8
century artifacts, documenting historic use of the Farwell House and the potential of earlier
artifacts to be in situ in older layers of soil.
The 2012 summer KASET field school, led by Cruz, excavated a transect of 50x50
centimeter test pits that were converted into 1x1 meter units fifteen meters north of the filled
house structure (Units: N15E0, N15W5, N15W10, N15W15) (Figure 3). The KASET
fieldschool also excavated two meters closer to the house mound (Units: N4W16, N4W17). The
2012 AFW excavated 50x50 centimeter test pits on a transect twenty meters north of the datum
(TPs: N20E0, N20W5, N20W10, N20W15, N20W20). The goal of the 2012 excavations was to
investigate the lawn north of the Farwell House to survey for archaeological features (Cruz and
Ranslow 2013).The 2012 excavations recovered artifacts related to 20th
century domestic and
architectural use of the Farwell House property, suggesting that cultural material from the
historic use of the Farwell House property extends well beyond the house mound.
In 2013, Cruz and the KASET field school continued excavating 1x1 meter units on the
northwest side of the foundation, which would have been the front yard of the Farwell House
(Cruz and Ranslow 2014). Cruz excavated three units (Units: N7W2, N7W1, and N6W2) (Figure
3), which contained artifacts evidencing 20th
century domestic and architectural use of the
Farwell House property. Cruz also identified a feature in N7W1, which was a dense
concentration of glass, nails, metal piping, ceramics, and charcoal. The AFW excavated test pits
along the N25 transect (TPs: N25E0, N25W5, N25W10). A light scatter of artifacts was
recovered, most of which were nails, which might be evidence of an historic outbuilding on the
farm property.
9
Figure 3: Map of Farwell House Excavation Units 2006-2014
A permanent datum was established at the Farwell House site in July 2010. Ranslow
placed a spike in the northeast corner of the foundation that will serve as a permanent datum
(N0E0) for future excavations (Figures 3, 4 & 5). The coordinates of the permanent datum are
41°49’4.36”N, 72°15’16.01”W and 719’ above sea level with a 16’ estimated error. This
coincidently is as close as can be possibly estimated for the N0E0 established in 2006 by
Thompson.
10
Figure 4: Permanent N0E0 Datum
Figure 5: Northeast Corner of the Foundation Looking South
11
Methods
The July 2014 KASET archaeological excavations were supervised by UConn graduate
student Zachary Singer, M.A. and the October 2014 AFW excavations were supervised by
Mandy Ranslow, M.A., R.P.A. Nicholas Bellantoni, Ph.D., the Connecticut State Archaeologist,
served as the head consultant for the project.
The KASET excavations consisted of six 1x1 meter units positioned on the northwest
side of the foundation, which would have been the front yard of the Farwell House. Four of the
units were placed at the North 10-meter line in five meters intervals running east to west
(Units:N10E0, N10W5, N10W10, N10W15) (Figures 3 and 6) and two units were excavated six
meters to the south, closer to the house mound (Units: N4W15, N4W10). In addition to
traditional unit excavations, Singer employed systematic metal-detecting surveys in two 10x10
meter boxes, one to the west of the foundation (S10 W20) and one to the north of the foundation
(N20W10) (Figure 7). Mandy Ranslow, Katie Lynch, David Colberg, and Anya Rozman assisted
Singer in the set up of the site. Chantal Henry, Danielle Fernald, Martina Krumova, and Scott
Brady assisted with field work in July and offered their invaluable expertise.
12
Figure 6: 2014 Units Looking West
Figure 7: Metal Detecting
13
UConn permits yearly excavations at the Farwell House Site based on the stipulation that
the grass is removed intact and the ground surface is restored to its natural appearance with grass
replaced after excavations conclude for the year. Singer and volunteers removed the grass in
each unit before KASET field school students initiated excavating units in five-centimeter levels
using trowels. Following the recommendation of Ranslow and Cruz (2011:10-11), depth
measurements for each level were measured from the natural surface stratigraphy. Four students
were assigned to each unit under the supervision of a volunteer. Volunteers also supervised
screening stations to assist the students in passing soil through ¼ inch hardware mesh screen to
recover artifacts (Figure 8). Volunteers checked all screens to ensure that all artifacts were
recovered. Students took shifts systematically surveying metal detecting boxes under the
supervision of the volunteers. All artifacts were stored in bags with their provenience recorded
on the bag. Unit level forms were also employed to record artifact provenience and planviews for
each five-centimeter level. Students were required to complete unit level forms, but Singer
maintained the official excavation level forms. The paperwork is stored with the artifacts at the
Office of State Archaeology storage facility at UConn.
14
Figure 8: Screening Artifacts
Due to time constraints of a one-week field season, none of the units were excavated to a
depth greater than 25centimeters below surface. Singer and Krumova cleaned all recovered
artifacts. After cleaning and drying, Singer identified each artifact prior to packaging in
inventory bags. Artifact information was recorded on the individual bags, and the artifacts were
inventoried in the master database (in Excel) created in 2010.
The 2014 AFW excavated four 50x50cm test pits at N0E5, N15E5, N20E5, and N20E10
(N15E10 was skipped because a large rock is on the surface at that location). Test pits were
excavated to a maximum of 30 centimeters below surface due to time limitations of the
Workshop. Test pits were opened with a shovel to remove the turf. Excavation of all test pits
proceeded with trowel in ten centimeter levels by AFW participants who were overseen by
15
Ranslow and Lori Kessel (Figure 9). Dirt was sifted through ¼” mesh screens, and screens were
monitored by Ranslow and Kessel. Official paperwork was maintained by Ranslow. Artifacts
were washed and cataloged by Ranslow.
Figure 9: AFW Participants Excavating Test Pit
Report of Findings
The July 2014 KASET excavations were located to the northwest of the Farwell House
foundation mound on the front lawn of the house. The majority of the artifacts recovered were
architectural (e.g. nails, brick, window glass, window putty, asphalt shingles, and mortar). Many
artifacts show evidence of melting or burning (e.g. charred wood, melted glass, and slag). Some
domestic artifacts were recovered, which include bottle glass, ceramics, bone, and a Victorian-
16
era hair clip. Metal detecting located many metal artifacts, most of which are associated with the
agricultural use of the Farwell property, such as bolts and irons rods. (See Appendix 1 for a full
list of the artifacts excavated).
The ceramic artifacts include red earthenware (31 sherds), creamware (1 sherd),
whiteware (3 sherds), and pearlware (9 sherds). The whiteware sherds were found 10-15
centimeters below surface, while the creamware sherd was found at a depth of 15-20 centimeters
below the surface. The stratigraphic trend of older ceramics recovered below newer ceramic
styles was noted in previous excavations of the Farwell House (Ranslow and Cruz 2012) and
suggest the possibility that lower soil horizons at the site will yield artifacts dating to the
occupation of the house by the Farwell family.
Other domestic artifacts recovered during the 2014 KASET excavations included bottle
glass fragments and a metal broche. Most bottle glass fragments were clear with no decoration,
however one painted clear glass sherd was found in N10E0 10-15centimeters below the surface
(Figure 10). A metal broche, which Dr. Kevin McBride identified as likely originating in the
Victorian era, was recovered through metal detecting (Figure 11).
17
Figure 10: Painted Bottle Glass Sherd
Figure 11: Victorian Era Broche
18
More than half of artifacts uncovered in July 2014 at the Farwell House were
architectural artifacts. Most of the artifacts are likely related to the destruction of the house as a
part of the fire training exercise. Broken window glass, melted glass, and metal fragments were
found in all excavation units.
Other architectural artifacts included more than 128.8 grams of brick, 33 nails and nail
fragments, 107 slate shingle fragments and 46.43 grams of mortar. Of the 33 nails, 17 were wire
nails, 12 were machine cut nails, and 4 were too corroded or fragmented for identification.
These nails likely reflect architectural elements associated with the latter part of the house’s
history.
A Pre-Contact argillite projectile point medial fragment was recovered in the N10E0 unit
while Singer was straitening the walls of the unit (Figure 12). The fragment retains one possible
side-notch and looks similar in style to Late Archaic Brewerton side-notched points, however
since the lithic is fragmentary the typological identification is tenuous.
19
Figure 12: Projectile Point Fragment.
A combination of domestic and architectural artifacts was recovered by the AFW
(Appendix 1). N0E5, located near the extant driveway showed evidence of disturbance, and only
asphalt and slag were recovered. Asphalt was recovered from the top layers of N15E5 along
with creamware, machine cut and wire nails, glass, and brick. Soils appear to have been
somewhat disturbed with both 19th
and 20th
century artifacts found together. N20E5 and
N20E10 located north of the Farwell House appear to be less disturbed. Domestic artifacts (e.g.
refined earthenware, bottle glass, plastic fragments, stoneware, and creamware) were recovered.
A copper shotgun shell was found in N20E5, however there are no markings on it to determine
its age (Figure 13). Architectural artifacts (e.g. brick and nails) were found in the greatest
quantities in N20E10 along with coal and bottle glass. The 2013 AFW recovered similar
20
artifacts from N25E0 and N25W10. While the information is limited, this may suggest a
structure was once standing to the north of the Farwell House. No structure is shown at this
location on the 1934 or 1965 aerial photos; however an earlier structure may have been present
north of the House (Figures 14 and 15).
Figure 13: Copper Shot Gun Shell
21
Figure 14: 1934 Aerial Photo (Courtesy of CT State Library)
Figure 15: 1965 Aerial Photo (Courtesy CT State Library)
Unknown
Outbuilding
Jacobson
Barn
Farwell
House
Approximate
Area of 2014
AFW Testing
Unknown
Outbuilding
Jacobson
Barn
Farwell
House
Approximate
Area of 2014
AFW Testing
22
Recommendations
The authors and the CSMNH recommend that summer and fall excavations continue at
the Farwell House site for members of KASET and the AFW. Participants are taught about
preservation, maintenance, and the research potential of cultural resources through the hands-on
experience. The authors recommend that the 2015 KASET and AFW programs continue
documenting the historic land-use of the Farwell House site property by excavating 1x1 meter
units in the front lawn of the Farwell House. In addition to meter excavations, 50x50 centimeter
test pits and metal detecting should be employed in an attempt to identify activity areas and
locations of other buildings that may have existed on the farmstead property. Test pits will also
reveal the integrity of the site’s stratigraphy, which will be considered during the analysis of the
site’s eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. Test pitting and metal detecting will
also allow increased horizontal archaeological survey of the Farwell House property, which is
useful for creating a management plan for the site. The excavation area 10 meters north of the
Farwell House foundation has the potential to yield artifacts mainly related to 19th
and 20th
century occupations of the house providing the KASET excavators an opportunity to find many
artifacts while learning archaeological field methods.
The possibility that additional Pre-Contact lithics will be recovered during subsequent
excavations should be considered. Native American use of the area has been well documented,
especially along the Fenton River and Mansfield Hollow Dam. Volunteers must carefully assist
KASET students in checking screens for both Historic and Pre-Contact artifacts.
It is recommended that all assemblages, data, and research from the Farwell House site
continue to be stored at the Office of State Archaeology storage facility at UConn so that future
researchers can access the data produced during previous years’ work.
23
Works Cited
Benard, Akeia
2007 Report on 2007 Excavations at the Farwell House Site. On file at the Connecticut’s
State Historic Preservation Office.
Cazel, Annarie P.
The Farwell Family and House, Mansfield, Connecticut.
Cruz, Heather Cowan
2010 Report on 2009 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation Office.
2009 Report on 2008 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation Office.
Cruz, Heather Cowan and Mandy Ranslow
2013 Report on 2012 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
and Engineers Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation
Office.
2014 Report on 2013 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
24
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
and Engineers Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation
Office.
Gradie, Robert R.
1977 End of Fieldwork Management Summary, Farwell House, Mansfield, Connecticut.
2012 Meeting with Mandy Ranslow on 5-21-2012 at the Raymond Library, East Hartford, CT.
Poirier, Dave
2002 Historic Resources Inventory Report for site 78-184/Farwell House.
Ranslow, Mandy and Heather Cowan Cruz
2011 Report on 2010 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation Office.
2012 Report on 2011 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut: Excavations by the participants of The Connecticut State
Museum of Natural History and Connecticut Archaeology Center ‘Kids Are Scientists
Too’ Module. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation Office.
2012 Excavation with Kids at the Farwell House, Storrs, CT paper presented at the Society for
Historical Archaeology Conference, Baltimore, MD.
Thompson, Kristina Lammi
2007 Report on 2006 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut,
Mansfield, Connecticut. On file at the Connecticut’s State Historic Preservation Office.
Unknown Author
25
1976 UConn House Burning Still a Smoldering Issue. Unlabeled newspaper article in KAST
file. pgs. 1 & 12.
26
Appendix 1
2014 Artifact Inventories
Report on 2014 Excavations at the Farwell House Site, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut
Zachary Singer
78-184
Farwell House, Mansfield, CT
Inventory # Bag# Unit Depth (CmBS) Count
Weight (g) Category Comments
1333 1 N10E0 0-5 1 0.8 slag
1334 1 N10E0 0-5 8 8.1 brick
1335 1 N10E0 0-5 4 2.7 slate
1336 1 N10E0 0-5 0.4 coal sample
1337 2 N10E0 5-10 1 5.5 nail Machine cut, ID'ed by Bill Farley