Report Engineering Investigation at Inactive Hazardous ...

••

•

ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS AT

INACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES IN Tl-E

ST ATE OF NEW YORK

PHASE I - PRELIMINARY lNVESTIGA TION

FINAL REPORT

TRONIC PLATING COMPANY, INC. SITE

CONTRACT NO. 0000452 NYSDEC SITE NO. 152028

Submitted To: Division of Solid Waste

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

50 Wolf Rood Albany, New York 12233-0001

Submitted By: Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc.

1250 Broadway, 15th Floor New York, New York I 0001

September 20, 1984

82C4548

396874

I lll/11 //Ill lllll l//ll /llll /ll// l/ll /ll/

; --- (J'P:O Oili

~~ -

-

1250 Broadway. 15th Floor New York. New York 10001 212-926-2878 (NY: NJ) 212-594-2118 (Direct) Telex 133-541

Woodvvard·Cl~de Const:~Hants, Inc.

September 20, 1984 82C4548

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid Waste Room 209 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233

Attention:

Subject:

Dear Sir:

Mr. Norman H. Nosenchuck Director

Engineering Investigations at Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites in the State of New York Phase I - Preliminary Investigation Tronic Plating Company, Inc. NYSDEC No. 152028 EPA No. Not Available

This report presents the results of our Preliminary Investigation of the

Tronic Plating Company, Inc. site in Farmingdale, Suffolk County, New York.

This preliminary investigation fulfills the requirements of Phase I of our Contract

No. D000452 to perform engineering investigations at 40 inactive hazardous waste

sites in the State of New York. Phase JI involves field investigation services at

the sites.

The objective of Phase I was to:

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

collect and review data

perform a site reconnaissance

prepare a draft 1-iazard Ranking System (HRS) and Documentation

develop a specific site work plan for Phase II

develop Phase II site investigation costs

identify known responsible parties

prepare a summary report

Ccnsu1ting Engineers. Geologists and Env:ronmental ·Scient:sts

100002

• September 20, 1984 82C4548 Page 2

V/oodward·Cly<le Consultants, Inc .

This report contains six sections. Section 1.0 includes a description of

the site. Section 2.0 presents the preliminary HRS work sheets, the HRS

documentation records, and EPA site assessment forms (2070-12 and 2070-13).

Section 3.0 provides a brief summary of the history of site activities. Section

4.0 includes a discussion of existing site data. Section 5.0 provides on assessment

of the data adequacy identifying major data gaps. Lastly, Section 6.0 presents

the recommended Phase II Site Investigation Work Pion and costs. The sampling

and analysis plan and the health and safety plan ore not included. These ore to

be supplied by NYSDEC.

Tronic Plating Co. Inc.is on active electroplating and anodizing facility

- which performs industrial plating for the electronics industry. State and County

authorities have determined that hazardous wastes consisting primarily of heavy

metals were discharged from storage tonks and leaching pools on the site. The

owner of the Tronic Plating Co. site is reportedly Jerrold Roth (President) of

Central Avenue, Farmingdale, New York.

•

The HRS scores developed for the Tronic Plating Co., Inc. site ore as

follows:

SM = 41.60 (Sgw = 71.97 Ssw = 0.0 S0 = 0.0 )

SFE = N/A

soc = 12.so

The adequacy of data must be evaluated in view of the source of the available

information. Tronic Plating denied us permission to conduct on on-site inspection

of their facility. Therefore, oil of the currently available site specific data

were token from existing SCDHS site inspection reports and laboratory test

results. No known analyses and testing of soils or water from the site have

been conducted.

10000.3

• Wocdv1ard·C!yde Consultants, Inc .

September 20, 1984 82C4548 Page 3

The work pion for Phase ll (field investigations) is specifically designed

to address the data gaps identified, and confirm allegations made regarding waste

disposal. The location, extent, character, and transport mechanism of the disposed

wastes are unknown. We have proposed a limited geophysical survey to better

define the possible presence of contaminant plumes. We also propose to install

three shallow (30 .±. ft.) monitoring wells, and to conduct ground water sampling

and analysis. A detailed description of the work plan and costs is provided in

Section 6.0. The total estimated cost for Phase II investigations at the Tronic

Plating site is $22,584.

If there are any questions or comments concerning the work plan or any

other portion of the Phase I report, please do not hesitate to contact us.

DRG/cp C634/l 19

Veq truly yours,

!. . -x~ ..,erLJ..Ll .. : 1~ Donald R. Ganser, Project Manager

10'-0004

• V/oodward·Cfyde Consultants, Inc .

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1-1

2.0 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION 2-1

2.1 Preliminary HRS Work Sheets 2.2 Documentation Records For HRS 2.3 EPA Form 2070-12 2.4- EPA Form 2070-13

3.0 SITE HISTORY

lt.O SITE DAT A

It.I Site Area Surface Features /t.2 Site Hydrogeology

4-.2.l Ground Water Occurrence lt.2.2 Ground Water Quality

4-.3 Past Sampling and Analysis

5.0 DAT A ADEQUACY

6.0 WORK PLAN

6.1 Objectives 6.2 Field Investigation Plan

6.2.1 6.2.2

Geophysical Studies Monitoring Wells

6.2.2.l Installation 6.2.2.2 Water Elevations 6.2.2.3 Aquifer Testing

6.2.3 Sampling and Analysis Plan

6.2.3.l General Plan 6.2.3.2 Sampling Parameters 6.2.3.3 Sampling Locations

6.3 Health and Safety Plan 6.4- Cost Estimate

C634-/119 i

2-2 2-10 2-24-2-29

3-1

4--1

4--1 4--1

4--1 4--2

4--3

.5-1

6-1

6-1 6-1

6-1 6-2

6-2 6-3 6-4-

6-4-

6-4 6-4-6-4

6-4 6-4

100005

• Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc .

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

6-1 PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES AT TRONIC PLATING COMPANY SITE 6-5

6-2 GEOPHYSICAL STUDIES COSTS 6-6

6-3 DRILLING/WELL INSTALLATION COSTS 6-7

6-4 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS COSTS 6-8

6-5 REPORT PREPARATION COSTS 6-9

6-6 PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTS 6-10

C634/ll9 ii lQOOO~

- ------

• Woodvvard·Clyde Consultants, Inc .

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure

l SITE LOCATION MAP - TRONIC PLATING COMPANY, INC.

2 LOCATION PLAN FOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION

C634-/119 iii 1B0007

• Woodward-Clyde Consultzints, Inc .

APPENDICES

Appendix

A REFERENCES

B PERTINENT INFORMATION

C UPDATED NEW YORK STATE REGISTRY FORM

C634/119 iv 100008

Woodward-Clyde ConsuHar.ts, Inc.

Id v IA_ J l3Jo ~ ( ""'- .

1.0

SITE DESCRIPTION

Tronic Plating Company Inc. is located at 168 Central Avenue in

Farmingdale, New York (Figure I). The site is located in southwestern Suffolk

County, approximately 11/i miles east of the Nassau County line. Tronic Plating

Co., Inc. currently occupies the southeast corner of a long building in an industrial

park area. The site presently consists of the building, 2 inside above ground

waste storage tanks, 4 below ground leaching pools, and a storm drain in the

paved area to the northeast of the building (SCDHS 1983).

At the time of the site survey (WCC, 1983), Tronic Plating was an active

electroplating facility and did not grant wee permission to visit the facility. As

a result the site survey was limited to the general vicinity of the site and details

of waste storage is based on available documents only. The area surrounding

the site is generally paved with other commercial and industrial facilities located

in the vicinity. Cemeteries are located Y- mile east and approximately 1,000 ft.

south of the site.

C634. I /119 1-1 .400009

• Woodward·Clyde Consultani"s, Inc .

2.0

U.?. ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY DOCUMENTATION

This section includes documentation records and work sheets required to

develop Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores. In addition, two EPA forms

regarding site inspection and preliminary assessment hove been completed and

ore included as required.

Documents included in this section are:

I. Preliminary Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Work Sheets

2. Documentation Records for HRS

3. EPA Form 2070-12 (Preliminary Assessment)

4. EPA Form 2070-13 (Site Inspection Report)

All forms were prepared as completely as possible using information available

from county, state, and federal agency files. However site-specific data ore

very sporce and consist primarily of SCDHS site inspection reports and laboratory

test results. All information provided in the Documentation Records for HRS

is referenced, and copies of most references ore included in Appendix B.

C634.2/l l9 2-1 100010

Woodward·Clyde Consultants, Inc.

e --..

2.1 Preliminary HRS Work Sheets

C616.2/119 2-2 ..

l0001l

•

e

lacilicy Ra:m.: Tronic Plating Co., Inc.

Loe.a tiou: 168 Central Ave., Farmingdale, NY

11' A I.a p.ou: II

c. Mancini, wee 6 Sept. 83

C.nara.l D.~riiltiou of the facility:

(!'or ~le: laadfil.l, surface impoundlleu:, pile, coutrlner; type• ot b.a:ardou.t sub1tauces; locatiou of the facilir,; cout~n.atiou route of major concerti; types of infona.atiou needed for ratina; aseucy action, etc.)

Areas of concern include inside above ground waste storage tanks.

below ground pit and outside leaching pools. Hazardous materials

of concern include heavy metals from rinse tanks. The major route

of concern is ground water, with a score of 71.97.

Score•: 5K - 41.60 (Sp • 71. 97 Ssw • 0.0 s. - 0.0 )

Sn• N/A

5DC • 12.50

100012

~%.-.•·-----------.1-. -

• ·~

GROUND WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET

"8ting ~actor AuianeG Value t W\Jlti- Score ~. · Ref. tClrcl• On•) oner Seo re (Section)

ill ObMNeC RefM.M 0 '5 , 0 '5 3.1

"oe&eNed '91u.s.e ia given a~• of '5. procffd to llM {!]." If oCHNed r~ ia gtv.n a seor-e of 0. O'QCHd to IJM [!}.

m Rout• ~stic:a a 1 ~

l.l C)ecrt1'1 to ,l(;ulfet of % ~ I Cone~

Ne! Precipitation a •ffi3 1 1 3 ~lityof~ 0 1 2 3 1 ~ l Unuti.nted~

1 ;c;) fllfly~ State 0 1 .3 3

I Toal ~te Chanct~.ics S«>re \3 15

m Containment Q 1 20) , 3 3 3.3

G1 Wute O'laractMi~

• ,G1a 1•

Toaicity I Pera.ist~ 0 3 • 1G) 1 \S 11 Ha:atCO\l.a Wute 0 , 2 3 ' 5 •

, 8 I ~

I Tota& w..te Chancterlatiea Score 1~ 21 .

[3J Targets . 3.5 Qrownd Water UM 0 1~3 . 3 " I OfstAnee to Neerat l 0 • I 10

, 40 40

Wett/~ 12 ,. ,, ~ ~ 2• 3Q lZ .a

I Totm Ter;.ta Score q" • [!] KUM~ .. '5. muttipty cli11':' Jl [)]

If line aa_a.~ • •C!l• ti] 41, 1G:t:l. 57.330

CiJ Ot-ricSe UM [!] by 57,330 ~ tnultti>ty by 100 Sgw• 1-J. q"".J. 1i1nn1. 1 ) ----.-1

I

. ~ .. -- -- ,.._._,... ·-1...-·- ... - ·- -··· - --· --·--------- ·- ···-

• SURFACE WATER ROUTE WORK SHEET

flt&ting f'ac10t ANJgrt..cs Value Multi. kc><•

Mu. Ref. (Cirel• One> i>ll•r Scor• IS.et\Onl

[!) ()t)s~ Re-IUM 0 '5 1 0 45 4.1

If ~ r~ ia Oiv•n • w:aiu• of '-'· pro<:H'd to line rn. If ~ r9'1U.S. is gi-.en I value of 0, l:)f'O(;Md to line m

al "°'11• C1\.&rai:teri~ @1 2 3

•.J 't.:ility SSOQ-e anci tnt~nq 1. 0 3 Terrain • ·

1-yr. 24-hr. ~nf&ll c!> ,~3 ' ~ 3 C)(.ance to HurHt Surfae• 1 3 2 0 I Water

a' 2Q) ~aie.al State , ..3 3

I Tot ti Route ~..nsuca Sc.or• 5 15

[1J Conta.inm~ a , 2G) 1 3 1 •.3

[!] Waste Cl\ar¥:tenStlcs '·' To.icity , ,. MSi st e-nce 0 3 I 11~1 1 \S ,, w.z.araoia Waste 0 , 2 3 ' • 1(!} 1 8 I Quantity .

I T~ Waste ~en~~ 13 21

[3J T~ets 4.5 ~.water UM ~, z 3

3 0 • Ofatanc• tO • s.Mitt¥9 1 a 3 2 0 • lnvi~ ~.tion S.,.._,104starice } 4 I I 10

, 0 ., to Water lntair..e ,, 11 20 Downatt'Ml'n 24 XI 32 l! 40

J. I Tot.t Targe1.1 ~ 0 51

m "11ne m • 45. mui~ m • m • m .

•MM m • o. ,....~ []] • ID • t!l • Iil 0 M.350

[!] QMde HM t:iJ by 64.350 ~ ~y by 100 .... - 0.0

2-5 lfrO.Q 1·4

. -..: .. ---":.·--~-- - . --- - ·--- -- . ..

• AIR ROUTE WORK SHEET

"-tin; Factor t Adign~ Value liiluttl-

ke><• Max. Aet.

lOrcie Onel plier Score tSeetion1

m ObHNed R..ieue -- © 45 1 0 4! 5.1 ..

Cate and U>e&tlon: .

Sampll~ Protocol: -

If line m ls o. U'I• s - o. Ettter On nne rn . ""-~

"llM m ls~. tMil'I ;>ro<:Hd to line lil. rn Wut• O\&racterlstlca 5.2

Auctfvity and 0 1 2 3 1 3 lneOm ~tlt>l 1 ity

Toxicity 0 1 2 3 3 I HallrdOUI Wute 0 1 2 3 4 s I 7 a , a ~

' TOtlil Waate Ch&r"Kt~ ~ 20

tD Tar; ea S.3 ~Wh'hln } 0 I 12 15 11 1 30 ..WI._~ 21 2' 27 30

Ofstanc• tc s.n.lttve 0 , 2 3 2 • ltmronment Land UM 0 , 2 ~ , 3

. -

-. -

-- I Toe.I T.-;eta Scor'9 31

Gl MuHiPIY GJx[i]ll[i] () 35.100

1IJ ~ nne GI Dy 35. ioo and ~ Dy 100 •• - o.o

+,.

100015 2-6

'

/9

Air ~O\Ate 5':of"• (Sa>

2 . 52 52 5 ;w • sw • a

s

().Q

WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING SM

52

o.o

o .. o

100016

I i

. f

--." .

..

e

~

FIRE ANO EXPLOSION WORK SHEET

Rating F~or

rn Waste Charac:teriaUC. ~ E'lidenee 'Qnit&Oillty

tII

~~ fneom?&ti t:lility Hazardous Wute

Ou.al'I tlty

Targ~s

I Ci~n.:e to Nearut Poci~tlon

Ol.un<:• to Nura~ Suildl~

Cisian<:• to Senaittve Environm.m

Landu .. ~Witftin 2-Mll• ~1"'9 8uildl~I Wltftin 2-MU. ~~

I

I AuigMd Value tCircle One) I Mum- Seo<•

pller

, 3 1

a 3 1 a 1 2 3 1 0123 , .. a , 2 3 1 0 1 2 3 ' 5 I 1 I . J .. •

Total Wute ~sti<:S ~

a , 2 3 ' 5 , 0 1 2 3 1

0 , 2 3 1

a 1 2 3 , a , 2 3 ' 5 1

a , 2 3 ' 5 , .

. ~

s,,. 'N/A

Max. Score

3

3 3

.l 3 3 I

' : .

20 :

s

3

3

3 5

5 . . r

1,...0

Raf. !Section)

1., -

7.2

1.3

.

100017

• DIRECT CONTACT WORK SHEET

Jll.ati~ , actor

' A~~n+d VaJue I Multi- S«lr• M•x. Raf.

{Clrele One) plier Scora (S~ion)

m ~ lncid.ni G ~ 1 0 •! a.1

If llM m 1a 45.. ;>roc:Hd tO line m If nne m is O. proe.-.d to tine m •

til keaui~llty 00)2 3 , l 3 9.2

(!I Conta!nm..m 0 0) 1 \$ 15 8.3

8 Wut•~sties :(3). 15 .

Tcx~ty 0 1 .! 1! a.•

rn T~~ 2G)•

a.s ~Lation W.tnitl a 0 1 5 ' t ?-. 20 1-Mil• Radi~

G)1 Di•tane• tc a 2 3 ' 0 12 Critical ~tat

,

I T oc:a1 Targets s.:c.r. lA 32

rn "Utte m .. '5. ~ m • m ll rn lf lt~ GJ ia o. mul~ w JI rn x m :a GJ ~::;.co %1.S:O

rn OMd• llt'le r:!l Cy 2'1.«IO Ind ~ by 100 Soc• J;L.50

100018


2.2 Documentation Records for HRS

C616.2/ 119 2-10

100019

Woodward·Clyde Consuit~nts1 Inc.

DOCUMENTATION RECORDS FOR HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM

INSTRUCTIONS: The purpose of these records is to provide a convenient way to prepare an auditable record of the data and documentation used to apply the Hazard RCHlking System to a given facility. As briefly as possible summarize the information you used to assign the score for each factor (e.g., "Waste quantity = 4,230 drums plus 800 cubic yards of sludges"). The source of information should be provided foc each entry and should be a bibliographic-type reference that will make the document used for a given data point easier to find. Include the location of the document <rld consider appending a copy of the relevant poge{s) for ease in review.

FACILITY NAME: Tronic Plating Company, Inc.

LOCATION: Farmingdale, New York

C634/I 19 2-1 I

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc.

GROUND WATER ROUTE

I. OBSERVED RELEASE

Contaminants detected {5 maximum):

None known.

Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility:

N/A.

... * *

2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS

Depth to Aquifer of Concern

f'.lame/description of aquifer(s). of concern:

Upper glacial aquifer; Magothy aquifer (Franke and McC!ymonds, 1972; Jensen and Soren, 1974).

Depth{s). from the ground surface to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone {water table(s).). of the aquifer of concern:

31 ft. (Donaldson and Koszalka, 1979; USGS, I 979b).

Depth from the ground surface to the lowest point of waste disposal/storage:

13 ft. (Bens in and Burns, I 97 4 ).

C634/l 19 2-12

1 h o·. 0·1)··1· ' '"' '-' t;.,


Net Precipitation

Meon annual or seasonal precipitation (list months for seasonal).:

46 inches (User's Manual).

Mean annual lake or seasonal evaporation (list months for seasonal).:

31 inches (User's Manual).

Net precipitation (subtract the above figures).:

15 inches

·Permeability of Unsaturated Zone

Soil type in unsaturated zone:

Sandy loam (SCS, 1975).

Permeability associated with soil type:

less than 1 o-3 cm/sec greater than or equal to IQ-5 cm/sec (User's Manual).

Physical State

Physical state of substcrices at time of disposal (or at present time for generated gases).:

Liquid (Bensin and Burns~ 1979).

C634/l 19 2-13

• Vloodward·Clyde Consuitants, Inc .

3. CONTAINMENT

Containment

Method(s). of waste or leachate containment evaluated:

4 outside leaching pools; l inside holding pit; 2 above ground 4,000 gallon storage tanks; 1 I 00 gallon above ground tonk; numerous small rinse tonks; 25 drums.

Method with highest score:

Surface impoundment: 3 (Bensin and Burns, 1974).

4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

Toxicity and Persistence

Compound{s). evaluated:

Copper Zinc Silver Iron Lead Cadimum Cyanide

(Bensin and Burns, 1974).

Toxicity I I I I I I 3

Compound with highest score:

Cyanide : 15 (User's Manual).

1-tazordous Waste Quantity

Persistence 3 3 3 3 3 3 2

Total quantity of hazardous substances at the facility, excluding those with a containment score of 0 (Give a reasonable estimate even if quantity is above moximum).:

19 x I 06 gallons including contaminated soil.

Basis of estimating <:nd/e< computing waste quantity:

Based on 1,250,000 gallons per year water usage (Bensin and Burns, 1974). and a minimum of 15 years of operation. C634/ l 19 2-14

• Woodward·Clyde Consultants, Inc •

5. TARGETS

Ground Water Use

Use(s). of oquifer(s). of concern within o 3-mile radius of the facility:

Public water supply, industrial and irrigation of lawns (cemeteries, golf courses). (NYSDEC, I 983a).

Distance to Nearest Well

Location of nearest well drawing from aquifer of concern or occupied building not served by a public water supply:

222 Central Ave. (NYSDEC, I 983a).

Distance to above well or building:

e 1400 ft. (NYSDEC, 1983a).

Population Served by Ground Water Wells Within a 3-Mile Radius

Identified water-supply well(s). drawing from aquifer(s). of concern within a 3-mile radius and populoti()('\$ served by e<X:h:

Public water supply well fields for South Huntington, Dix Hills, East Farmingdale, Babylon (Suffolk County Water Authority) and Plainview Water Districts. Population served are, 51,200, 30,000, 5,200, 377,000, 35,000 respectively. (SCDHS, I 983d; Rand Mc Na I ly, 1980).

Computation of land area irrigated by supply well(s). drawing from aquifer(s). of concern within a 3-mile radius, and conversion to population (1.5 people per acre).:

None (SCDHS, I 983a).

Total population served by ground water within a 3-mile radius:

About 498,000 (SCDHS, l 983a).

C634/l 19 2-15

1 ()0 0 'l-4 v ·•'1..1

Woodward-Clyde Consu!tanls, Inc.

SURF ACE WATER ROUTE

1. OBSERVED RELEASE

Contaminants detected in surface water at the facility or downhill from it (5 maximum).:

None known.

Rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility:

N/A.

2. ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS

Facility Slope and Intervening Terrain

Average slope of facility in percent:

e Less than 3 percent (WCC Site Survey, 1983).

Nome/description of nearest downslope surface water:

Amityville Creek (USGS, I 979a).

Average slope of terrain between facility c:rtd above-cited surface water body in percent:

Less than I percent (USGS, 1969).

Is the facility located either totally or partially in surface water?

No (USGS, 1979; WCC Sit, Survey, 1983).

C634/l I 9 2-16 10002·5

• Woodward-Clyde Consu!tants, Inc .

Is the facility completely surrounded by areas of higher elevation?

No (WCC Site Survey, 1983).

I-Year 24-Hour Rainfall in Inches

2.7 inches (User's Manual).

Distance to Nearest Downslope Surface Water

4 miles (USGS, I 979a; USGS, I 979b).

Physical State of Waste

Liquid (Bensin and Burns, 1974).

3. CONTAINMENT

Containment

* * *

Method(s). of waste or leachate containment evaluated:

See: Ground Water.

Method with highest score:

Surface impoundment : 3 (Bensin and Burns, 1974).

C634/l 19 2-17

10002ff

Woodward·C!yde Consl!Ha1iis, Inc .

• 4. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

Toxicity and Persistence

Compound(s). evaluated

See: Ground Water.

Compound with highest score:

See: Ground Water.

1-iazardous Waste Quantity

Total quantity of hazardous substances at the focility, excluding those with a containment score of 0 (Give o reasonable estimate even if quantity is above maximum).:

19 x 106 gallons including contaminated soils

e Basis of estimating <rid/oc computing waste quantity:

See: Ground Water.

... ......

5. TARGETS

Surface Wat er Use

Use(s). of surface water within 3 miles downstream of the hazardous substcnce:

None (USGS, I 979a, USGS, I 979b).

C634/I 19 2-18

10oot)1 J •t;,..,.


Is there tidal influence?

No (USGS, I 979a, USGS, I 979b).

Distance to a Sensitive Environment

Distance to 5--ocre (minimum). coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish and Wildlife, I 975a).

Distance to 5--ocre (minimum). fresh-water wetland, if I mile or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish ar;id Wildlife, I 975b).

Distance to critical habitat of on endangered species or national wildlife refuge, if I mile or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1983; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1983).

Population Served by Su...face Water

Location(s). of water-supply intake(s). within 3 miles (free-flowing bodies). or I mile (static water bodies). downstream of the hazardous substance aid population served by each intake:

N/A.

C634/l 19 2-19

100028

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, lnc.

Computation of land area irrigated by above-cited intoke(s). and conversion to population ( 1.5 people per acre).:

N/A.

T olol population served:

N/A.

Name/description of nearest of above water lxx:lies:

N/A.

Distance to above-cited intakes, measured in stream miles:

N/A.

C634/119 2-20 100029

• Wooclward-CI~·de Consultan?:s, In.c .

AIR ROUTE

I. OBSERVED RELEASE

Contaminants detected:

None known.

Date CV1d location of detection of contaminants:

N/A.

Methods used to detect the contaminants:

N/A.

Rationale foc attributing the contaminants to the site:

-- N/A.

... .... 2. WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

Reactivity aid Incompatibility

Most reactive compcxnd: ·

None known.

Most incompatible pair of compounds:

None known.

C634/l l 9 2-21

100030

• Woodward·Clyde Consuifants

1 Inc •

Toxicity

Most toxic cornpolIDd:

None known.

Hazardous Waste Quantity

Total quantity of hazardous waste:

19 x 106 gallons including contaminated soil

Basis of estimating and/or computing waste quantity:

See: Ground Water.

3. TARGETS

Population Within 4-Mile Radius

Circle radius used, give population, and indicate how detecmined:

0 to 4 mi 157,031

0 to 1 mi 1239

(Donnelly Marketing, 1982).

Distance to a Sensitive Environment

0 to 1/2 mi 0

0 to 1/4 mi

Distance to 5-acre (minimum}. coastal wetland, if 2 miles or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1975a).

Distance to 5-acre (minimum}. fresh-water wetland, if 1 mile or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1975b).

C634/119 2-22 100031

• Woodward-Clyde Consultants1 Inc •

Distance to critical habitat of an endangered species, if I mile or less:

None (NYSDEC, Division of Fish and Wildlife, 1983).

Land Use

Distance to commerciot/industriol area, if I mile or less:

Immediately adjacent to site (WCC Site Survey, 1983).

Distance to national or state park, forest, or wildlife reserve, if 2 miles or less:

1.2 miles (USGS, 1979b).

Distance to residential area, if 2 miles or less:

0.5 mil es (Donnelly Marketing, I 982).

Distance to agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if I mile or Jess:

None (NYS Department of Agriculture and Marketing, 1983).

DistCYlCe to prime agricultural land in production within past 5 years, if 2 miles OT Jess:

None (NYS Department of Agriculture and Marketing, 1983).

Is a historic or lcndmark site (National Register of f-fistoricaJ Places <rld National Natural Laidmarks). within the view of the site?

No (NYS Parks and Recreation, 1983).

C634/l l9 2-23 10003~2·

Woodward·Clyde Consu:tants, Inc •

• 2.3 EPA Form 2070-12

(Preliminary Assessment)

• C616.2/119 2-24

100.03.3

-POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. lOENTIFJCA TION

&EPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 01 STATEI02 SITE NUMBER

PART 1 - SITE tNFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT ~y IJ/IT I

11. SITE NAME AND LOCATION 01 SITE f'ol.£.ME (L•g#. ~ .. or ~•~l;f'CfiV'9 ,...,,,.. ot Me) 02 STREET, ROUTE NO., OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IDENTIFIER

Ti2-or.o\c. Yl...AT1"16 CD/'VIPftrJY J ..rr.J c. Its CeN-fr1...A L. Av~. 03 CITY °' ST ATE l°5 ZIP COOE I 06 COUNTY rCOUN I Te CONG FA f).r>") I~ Go-- :l>A Le:- rJY Jl73f"" .5vFFoLK.

CODE DIST

103 09 COORD<NATES LATITUDE - LONGITUDE

+o 4-~ J_'J__ 0 I _:!.2 ~+ f]. 0 10 OfRECTIONS TO SITE 1sr.,-r.,11 ''°"' ,,..,,., ,,.,_ ~

..".:::>.::> "-Tk.. J+ar r~ lri.A.n ia..1 E>c.prC!>S<-<...~ ~st -fu ~+. l>o .!:'as -t c~n-tY-al Ave.

.I

on 1 ew +t,·~hw,-u.i .f.4 st . I

1/1. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES

01 OWNER'"""°'"'"' 02STREET (~. -· ru..O.nt..i)

J e-t'l2. ~ L. l> R.o!H I p 14cS I Dcto-1 J" 168. CcrJltlAL I'.!€"

03CfTY o.sTATEI 05 ZJ?cooe I oe TELEPHONE NUMBER

FAa...m1NctPALt /\J)" J/73~ <~U> 1..A2-7rl3 07 OPERATOR /XicJ'tOirn'MHSdd'feremtromc..,,..t1 08 STREET (lluV..u. ~. ,....,_,,...,

Ci CITY 10STATE111 ZIP CODE 112 TELEPHONE NUMBER

( )

TYPE OF OWNERSHIP 10..C•-J

1"A. PRIVATE D 8. FEDERAL: DC.STATE DD.COUNTY 0 E. MUNICIPAL .. 1•~1-1

0 F.OTHER: 0 G.UNKNOWN 1s.-:;,1 .. ... •. - .... ,,.

14 OWNER/OPERA TOR NOTIFICATION ON f1LE /Chod< .. m.t °""YI

C A. RCRA 300 i DA TE RECEIVED: I I 0 8. UNCONTFIOLLED WASTE SITErCE!OCLA 103 ~1 DATE RECEIVED: I I CC.NONE M()O{TM OA Y YE.All MONT}< 0 .. Y YEAR

IV. CHARACTERiZATION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD

01 ON SITE INSPECTION BY (Check .. ,,.., _J

~YES DATE 7 llll f~ 0 A.EPA 0 8. EPA CONTRACTOR 0 C.STATE _)('D. OTHER CONTRACTOR ""°"'™ OA Y YE.All 0 E. LOCAL HEALTH OFFICIAL D F.OTHER:

ONO (fio«#y/

CONTRACTOR NAME(S): /NDopk.JA~,;::. - C.'-"t_l>E C..ONJ V l...J)tt('4T f INC.. I

02 SITE STATUS1c--1 03 YEARS OF OPEAATION

I YA.ACTIVE 0 8. INACTIVE 0 C.UNKNOWN ,~,i' Pttn°"r 0 UNKNOWN l!'EGINH!NG YE 'II ENO<HGYEAA

04 DESCRIPTION OF SUBST .t.NCES POSSIBLY PRESENT. KNOWN, OR AU.EGED

CoPf'~ 1 SILVE'l'\.-,, "Ll~C J tl't.orJ , L.E)'IP I c A:>,,., I\)"" / c.y/lt-rJ1-Pr

; 05 OESCRJFTION OF POTENTIAL 1-t>.Z.ARO TO E~ONMENT ANO/OR ?OPULA T10N

LfflCHAT'C Fn-o-. VN1) £1't.6 "LO~ LEl\Cl"tUJ6 "?oo'..1 h,.09 av~oFp P'!Lo/V'

I) N p /l.O IE" C. ~ ,,~;;>004 7?\~)IL .SPIL'J }'N't,,,t; t'b~rJTI~'- F,Jf"- J'2.£)1leH 1,.Jfr- &°'a.tvNP w A J'l'Yl,..".I

1"'1,12.A11rl• "Dow,J ~/1.f!QJ~ ~ ~AT£Yz..1rJ r- Pv1?or..1~ w A~ f11PPc.1e-I.

V.PRIORITY ASSESSMENT

01 PRIOAITYFORINSPECTION1o..c.-.•-.,-•cl>K.ted • ....-,•,,_2·---,,_,.~,,,,,u•-~--

0 A.HIGH JI(&. MEDIUM 0 C.LOW 0 D.NONE , .. ___ .,, -- ,..._..,, ___ ,,..,,..,,_~--....---

Vl. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM ,. ...

COOT ACT 020F1,._,,~.,_,, "Si_cFfz>/K c C) /.M.-1 '!1 Dep: d 03TELEPHONENVMBER

t..J I I... f.. I ltfV'. 12..o 13. EV\..;---' (S c.DH5) J-ko./#1 Servi e..s <5"/'l 4-S" J-4-627 04 PERSON RESPONSlaLE FOR !.SSESSMENT 05AGENCY

loeORGANQATION l~r~E~~UM%~ 080ATE

7>o1'1A~O a.. t; A_,.; Sen.. "'-'000 ....,Jl(\..D • Ct I -. s- 1z.1a:> C~~•.Jl.Tl't..JT"f /rt.. Of 7 -b 00 MONTH 04.Y 'r£..,_

EPA FORM 2070-12(7 .. 1) 100034 . I I I i

r .- POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION

J,EPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT O~Ty I 02 SIT;J/A(R

PART 2- WASTE INFORMATION

11. WASTE STA TES, QUANTITIES, AND CHARACTERISTICS

01 PHYSICAL STATES tC,..chlrr •• ,_,,, 02 WASTE 00.-.NTITY AT SITE 03 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS CCkct .,m.1-1 l~u. of wasU Q4.lof-"'l'l•,..J:

~A. TOXlC 0 ASOUO 0 E. St.URRY ......rM~fll} 0 E.SOLUSLE 0 I. ~LYVOLATr..E

0 8 POWDER. FINES jf!F UOUID TONS 0 8 CORROSIVE Cl F. l'olFECTIOUS 0 J EXPLOS!VE 0 C. RADIOACTIVE Ci G FLAMMABLE 0 K. REACTIVE 0 C.SLUDGE Ci G GAS ~4-1. ooo ~O. PERSISTENT 0 L "NCOMPATIBLE CUBICYAROS 0 H. IGNIT AS LE

DO.OTHER 0 M. NOT APPLICABLE

(~} - NO.OFORVMS

ITT. WASTE TYPE

CATEGORY SUBSTANCE NAME 01 GFIOSS AMOUt-IT !02 UNIT OF MEASURE 03COMMENTS

SLU SLUDGE

OLW OILY WASTE

SOL SOLVENTS

PSO PESTICIDES

occ OTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS l.1~ l'...Jow ,.> '1 ~ LlJM f: IOC INORGANIC CHEMtCALS

ACO ACIDS

BAS BASES

MES HEAVY METALS l-',..) &:c-"" 0 W..J v'oLu,...G IV. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 1s..~,,._.,,,,,,.,.,,,_r1y,,,,odCAs1<1.-,.,.J

01 CATEGORY 02 SUSST ANCE NAME 03 CAS NUMBER 1).4.STORACiEIO<SPOSAL METHOD 05 CONCEt-ITRATION Ofi t.IEASURE OF CONCENTRATON

M€5 C.c.FP~ ~vti..r-'"A~ J~Pov..;:,/'l'I f>Jf <j .j- /WI e; IL "2..Jr-lC.

, ... ,. ,, 12.0 If

~~r 51( ... v C:A- ., 0 ·If ,,

l""\C:f / ,4-o,.::J ,, - - ~ - - ,.., 0 ,, ,..... E"5 LE°49 .. ].1- fl

,...c,f CA-;>m1v,..,... 74+o-4J-47 ,. z.. ~ " occ.. c. YA-...J1'D€ ,., ., ~,.JJC

V. FEEDSTOCK~ ·s..,_,.,._io-C.As..._._.1

CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NVMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER

FOS FOS

FOS FOS

FOS FDS

FOS FOS

Vt. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 1c.t•~,.,.,...., ..... g •• .,.,.1 .... -...iya1o._..1

~

e scvJ-J5 rria..p ( 1q7cj) us~ l+u t1-k4}tv f\ / N . y. / 'I z. fYl •">'\. -fv pa30ph ,·c..

I Qt,<Cc a_,-,j/e- --

EPA FORM 2070-12 (7-61)

f·

• POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION

I SEPA 01 STATE I 02 SITE ABER PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT NY NI j PART 3 - DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS I . 1 11. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS

01.E: A.. GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ~q&'°, DOO

02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: } Ji! POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: v •

l t::'Yi f;, t1 uJ ' Poo<..f' Ft> tJ"' r.> ro eo,..,~,,J ~\Jy h1E/A <.J ~r LtY't:L.j Al')c.\1£

S°"J'l"t"'~A-f'-0$.

UE.>"tC tfA rl[ }'tit] Po T'c7'1i)A 1.. oF t2-t:YrCH 1,.J C. b/U<Jr'O ~Tl;Y\.. ( l>'ll,11-A ll,J6- be><.J,.J 6 l't.-14.P I@"_,--

01)!!l'"8. SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) )rJ' POTENTIAL Ci ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: v ~~,Jow,J O• NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

L-1:.')ll,<. J~ re 1> I~ C~61,J ,I J..JIP >/'On.~ 1:> fl....A- J r.J i-r.+r Po~n~ Fot1-£'l-' T En I ,J (, f 1,H'I, F74 c (; ,_,, A f\::?"\. r ~- OJ'f"FC.~ c F fTO~ 'J>/Z....,..,,.,

$' y f Tc.-----· 01 0 C CONTAMINATION OF AJR 02 Ci OBSERVED(DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL Ci ALLEGED .03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARF\A TIVE DESCRIPTION

No infor fT1ttn·o r1 4..va..cl~t b le.- (tJ/f+J

01 0 D. FIRE:EXPLOSNE CONDITIONS 02 C OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: O• NARRA TlVE DESCRIPTION - N/A 01 CE. DfRECT CONT"CT 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: 1· . 0- POTE/'ITIAL D ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NAARA T1VE DESCRIPTION

N/A 01pF. CONTAMINATION OF SOIL u oJ i::..rJowr 02 0 OBSERVED (DA TE: ) Ji! POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 03 AREA POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRA T1VE DESCRIPTION

{Acre•}

(_,C-VO.C ~ ~ 1-CJf+Jc J,_J'" I"" l'"'"U ,..,_ v IJ D E>'\. C 40 v,JO Pao t...J C.or~1,..A;1,..1 6

S• 1 '-f v,.sO l&T\.. .$ } rt:; IN J 'J")-1 rto.~7 Mt:-n.4-J c cyA-r-J,p("

01~ G. DAINKINGWATER CONTAMINATION 4'1.9'l () 0 0 02 0 OBSERVED {DATE: ) ~POTENTIAL 0 AL.L.£GED

03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

L &'4c.. rM 7€' rl"Y't f J··'" "TO>-J1) A'- ~o..i_ !2.e4-C-rr, rJ .s- b4othoJO 4.,.,J}t~ .A,N~ ~7"b"11,.Jr

?"<i l.l <- ..,.AT"si"- 5 ,;/>P1...y ::i> o .....,,_;) 6 /t.f4DJ E-11 ot: .( 111£.

01 0 H. WORKER EXPOSURE/INJURY 02 0 OBSERVED (0.t. TE. ) 0 POTENTIAL. 0 AU.EG£O 03 WORKERS POTENnAl..L Y AFFECTED: 04 NAAAATIVE DESCRIPTION

N/A

0 I. POPULATION EXPOSURE/INJURY 02 0 OSSERVED(O.t.TE: I 0 POTENTIAL. D AU..EGEO POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARRA T1VE DESCRIPTION ..

N /A - 100D3S :

EPA FURM 2070-12(7 .. 1)

I J.-,EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE l IOENTIFICATION

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT O~TYTEI02 ~Tfj//t"Fl .. PART 3- DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS

/

I U. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS rc°"'rw<di I 01 0 J. DAMAGE TO FLORA 02 0 OBSERVED (DA TE:

04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED

I N/A -01 0 K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED

I 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION r~nomol•Jot~••J

N/A I

I 01 0 L CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARAA TIVE DESCRIPTION

I N/ft I

01 0 M.UNSTABLECONTAINMENTOFWASTES 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENDAL 0 ALLEGED

I (~'f\Jf"lotf'sr~ ~•lfr.gdrl.IM)

03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NARAA TIVE DESCRIPTION

,J/Pr J 01 0 N. DAMAGE TO OFFSITE PROPERTY 02 0 06SERVED (DATE: ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED

• NARAA TIVE DESCRIPTION

I . tJ/A - -.. - ·- ..

01 ~ONTAMINATION OF SEWERS, STORM DRAINS, WNTPs 02 0 06SERVEO (DATE: ''i:.'- ) 0 POTENTIAL )"1<'ALLEGED 04 TIVE DESCRIPTION

( ~"L~~ovf ""'"''T"E'"} Fi'\.O,_ l.~J<;~ 6 ,..,.,.,..,, )C f' ~l.C..tr"6t'""'OL-~ ~"'° ty c.')-..> ,,..,~

l 5-ro,..,_ ~(1.A, ,.J

I

I 01 "f>. lLLEGAUUNAUTHORIZED DUMPING 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: L 1 &:_o ) 0 POTENTlAL J'!ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

L~'l9C~r<" ~ ~)C.1,I' /->001-J < /f't,..JJ#f J"h..,o f)JIC~CF '""""" .sro~-D/l.-A-1 rJ A 1-(..C 6 ~""t> 1-y

OC.C.Uf".~ . 0.5 DESCRIPTION OF ~ OTHER KNOWN, POTENTIAL. OR ALLEGED HAZARDS

I

NIA-111. TOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 4T-"1¥' 00 0

IV. COMMENTS

... -. . i V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ICt•~,.,.,_ ..... g.,_.,_ __ ....,,.._ __ ·.

e 5" CP H5 --

EPAF~2070-12(7-a1)

100037'

Woodward·Clyde Consultants, Inc .

• 2.4 EPA Form 2070-13

(Site Inspection Report)

C616.2/119 2-29

I•

&EPA POYENTIAL HAVJIDOUS WASTE SITE L IDEWTIFICATIOH

.. 51TE ~~i-SHECTK»i REPORT 01 STA.TE I 02 arrE ~

PAAT 1 - M"E LOCA noN A..>-20 ~CllON ~orud.&. TlOH NY' N

I. OO'E ~ AffiO LOC-A no+4 ' i'Ol"'~~it;",.;,.-. .. --r//- 02: aTJllEET. ~NO •• Oll'I ~ l.00\TON li9fTlAEJI\

Tfl-Or-l 1 '- PLATirJCr co,..,,pfl,..J)" ) .:rrJc "~ C EN fl"I.. A 1...- AvE ·:. Cll~n· - °'STA.TE i 06 rg. COOE I()& COlHTY

r~r~~ ::- FA fl.MING- DALi;: Ny' I 17 3 !) S.;ffoLr: I o,J Ill 're.$

I rO nn: OF (Doacl -J

u~ 77~1.__. ~A. f"AIY A TE D a. FEDERAL 0 C. STATE 0 D. COUNTY 0 E. t.ll...lt-ICIPAL !_o ·!f:: S- I "3 • 0 F.OTt-ER CG.UNKNOWN a. l'tSf>f:CTIOH l'Nf OR:iitA TlOH 01 Ool.TE OF • .: .. : -- , -

' 02: 91'\"E IT A. TVS ,~~OF~;-;b/ 7 l27l 5-3 ~~ I 'ftt.H&l,- _UNIQONN M0WT>< 04Y ~ ~YEA.I'\ ENOl"1G YE.t.f\

CM 1'l:JE)«;Y - - - -- HSPECTO< re-. - - -J 0 A. EPA 0 8. EJ> A eotrrRACTOA OC.~AL 0 D. YJNICIP Al CONTR>CTOA

OE.STATE J(F.STATECON'TRACTOR WooJ,_,,,:::7~~vdL £~,~ -r//--"'~ 1·£.•1'<.I• ' 7-,,,-;._ _,,

05 CHEF l'GPECTOR oemu 07 oPGAH:zA TION De TE.LE:PH>IE NO

/Y1. 5wJ t:,..J ror>Je.w.>JCJ CN,a.... r-r c. c:i <1. (-? ('/$) 6'10,J2.11 Oi on£P. HSPECTORS 10Trn.E , l Ol'IG,.t,HZATlQN 12 TEJ.£p,.o,jf NO

/Y'I • A J£ t:/'l. 13 i=n~ 5 512-. SMF"~ <("El:> Lo G 1 ~r 1-J C.C- <Zo 1l 7is>-o7oo

( )

( )

( )

( )

1 s an JlllEPfESE>'r-' T1'w'ES HTEJME~ 1.&TITU 1MDCl'E.SS 1•~MO

/'Jo~ c - VerJI E"D ~ lYl.,,"f ( )

I

5° I re- 5 LI '1-\,) .-y c 0,.J 0 I) (. T£1.:> F (le,-. OFP-)11 T ( )

( )

( )

- ( )

( )

17,.......~SY 1•TMEl7~ 1 t WE.t.n-E'I OOCi l iC»6 ----D1"Ell" 5,.. 0 CJ1S-- s J~/'»7' -J-~or a llotllWINCT

rt. N'OIWA T10H AV ALUU fl'ROll 01 CtCWT .tCT 02 OF ""° >'2 p i;V:fh,l_k. Cou11tt Deer O:t~JllO.

• l...JJ~'-IAl"'l 1..o I!. e-tl.15 SC. i::> H 5 <>t ,, 45:1- f6Z7 OF a l l'1 '-->'P .rv1 es 04 ~ fl£Si'O<W..£ FOfl STE IA CC I ON~ oe.....,....~ oe Ol'!GNCZAT'QN d

~~-=~~ oe E».T£

wocW-cc;.r~-Cly t--~ l 2-.l 'i'J "'l>o~A{...D '2-. G- A r.J..S €Y\....... - ~ C...C-'..-,··h -z..o,) >-o7oo

1-D,,., u. 1-hl ~ In<.. -™ P" y -

2-30

£Gt CM

• 13~ f'OTBfML 1-lA.ZAnOOllS WASTE afT£ L IDa<TFlCA llOH

arr£ ~CTIOH REPORT ~~1El°2~ _,. .. .,... * - - ·i>Afrrl·W.cU'YE~T!OM _,

L WMTE STA.~. OUAWlTTlES., AHO CHAltt.C~TICS ... I 01 ~.,-•TU ~---'YJ 02 WASTE CllMlrnTY AT !!lTE 0:3 •A.STE~ ~--IWlrl -. . ~- - ___..,,, __

~~ 01t..80f.lil - 0£.~

_ .. _ 0£.klU.9..£ Ct.~YYOLAn..E

0._~"'10 ~-F.LCU> lQN6 0 ~. W'ECT10Ut o~.~ cc 08..~ CJ f 1 Doo

oc.~ OCl~ Oil.~

0-9C y /111/l)iS /(o.~ 0 K. INT AlllE OL~._TSLE

0 O.on-el'I o .... 1«1T~ ......,., IC) OFOAUMS

a.WA.STE TYPE

CA~ &AIST N<;E JlolAME 01~~ ~2LNTOF~ 03~

SL.U SLUDGE

OLW C..Y WASTE

80L. 9:X.va<tS

f"SD P£STICCJES

occ OTHER~ CHEMIC.&.l..S v µ F+iow,J Uow,....G

IOC ~DEMICALS

ACO ACIDS

a.as BASES

MES >EA VY MET Al.5 c.)tJ;:::rJoW ,..J UOLvME°" EROOUS $UgSTA.HCESts-- --....-.-CAS--.1 QOillY 02 SLeST N#O£ NAME 113 CAS l'«..W&ll 06 5TOfWJE. ~ tETl<)O 05 a>;a:i;nv;T1:lH OI!~~ co..cf >{!'IV. n::io..

ME"'S' Copt~EY\- )U4.F. IJ'V\.Po\)rJ;>~~1'"" ~·!" ~c; IL . ~FE f '2..11"l c. " 11- '• ""~ f SI t.. v f2t'\- " 0 I 1 ' " ~e-~ 11'2...o~ ., /70 " /lo\ E"' S" l-e"'i!:> ,, '·'- ., ,,.,,~5 C~rvi Ii.),..,,.. 7 #D-i::J-47 .. 2.r rt

oc..c. CyAN1v€ c;., q '"T"'A .N ~

.

' V. f'E£DSTOO(I ~--CA.S-

CA'TBIOln' 01 1'&141 OCK~ OZCAI~ CA~ 01 Jl&DSTOCX ~ ClaCA.S.........,. ... FC8 .. PD6 ... PD6 ... .... ~Of' 94FOfltV.A.TIOflC lt:a-""'-. ..... ___ ...,.... -

S'CI:>J-t.$ .

100040 -

2·-31

'

POTamAL HAZA.RDOUS WASTE SITE L~TION

@EPA SITE IHSPECTION REPORT kn ~Ale l 02 fiITfJ it:°' /VY 1J

PARTl·~OFHAZARDOUS~AMD ~ 7 I

I. f",..UA.:;r.-o!..tl ~ "~ ~ ... ~A. (lo~ATEJll OOHT ~TlOH 4{j ~ O 0 0 O:.Z 0 OB90tt'ED (OATE· I /~ D AU.roED ~"OOH POTEHTW!. Y AffECTED: ) OC ~TI'w'E OE.9CfllP1lON

l:~~ CH J.,.1 6 f'oot..f Fi>-.J~D rt c 0 r-1 i'I'\ , _, H?;;l'tvy M E"T"l'l"-.f .A-r- L~Vf:L./ At1o"e

":>~~~$. lt ........ C.ttAtt Mi"t.S Po~TIAL- Fi> /I- a.e ..... C..t\ ',_.) (r '('L.o <)~ WA.~A,,._J;>

-:.vi l 6 ft-A ...-i ,.l ... "l>ow,J G- ('l....AZ> J ~ -r_ ·-

01 ~~WATER CONT~T!Ot'i 02 0 08:S6M:D (DATE· I If[ POT8'ffiAL D AU.EQE.O OJ TlON PO~ Y AFFECTED V ~~~ow,, OC NA.ARA TM OESCfllP110N

li!l\-C..l+A~ p 1.S '-l+llfl.61,lt- l~n:> srvn,... l> (l., /\ • r.> ~.s Pore-rH)AC.... Fo~ ~i'8'1.1r-J6-

S 1.1'-Ff-\c..E "-.IA~ ~(Lo,.,.. o JT" F -o "" OF STP~"' l>M1,..> sy ~7lz.,..,...

01 = C c;oo.rT ~TON OF /II'. 02 C 08SERVED (DATE ) 0 POTEHTIAL. 0 ALJ..EGEO 03 PQPVl.An::;... POTEHTW.l.Y AFFECTED: OC N.tm>..TM OESCAPTlON

rJo i n-fu rm a..--h ()('\ ~vtti I ct h(e ( rJ/fr)

01 :: 0 f'ff.'EX?LOSNE ~ 02 0 08SERVED (DATE ) D POTENTIAL D N..l.EGEO 03 POPULATlON POTENTIAU.Y A1'FECTED· OC NAAAATM OESCRPTlON

tJ I A

01 _, £ ~CT CONTACT 02_,~(0ATE I D POlCNTIAL 0 ALJ...EGED 03 POP1JV. TION POTENTW.L Y AFFECTS>. 04 NN'fV. TM OESCAFTlON

N/lt 01 F OQlo(T ~ TIOH OF 3CllL.

UtJ~rJow cl 02 D 08SE1'IVEO (OA TE ) 7~ 0 AU.EQED

l#£A PO~ y AFF£CTED: °" fW'RA'TM OESCAPTlON -lc-...C" t't re l.t.:""'A j& J cJ (3 F (1.-o,.,.. v ~ 0 EYl-6 l'l.<> v rJ 1> ?004.-.J ,Oo~n..-<- A>I"\-~~,,j A"i?AJ t. .501L. f \),.. i) t.""'- S1Te.

01 G ~WA~COHT~1"X>N.f-Cjf 0() O 02 D 08SEPi w'El (DA~ ) J!~ 0 M..L.EQIED ~ TlON POTEHTIAU. Y AFFECTED: 1 04 JIWllV.TM CE3CAIPTION

L t:-~ H'""A IE" AAJ r'o~niH- Fo"- ~G b '1A' vrJO c..JA-~ ~o

~.t-1.- ?.Jl)L..l C- wA\'c.~ $°&1 PfJL7 i:>owrl l.ILl\;::>1~-r OF $1T'C.

01 0 H. WOACB'I ~ 02 D C89ERVEO {°""TE. ) c~ Cl AU.EOED 03 ~ l'O~Y AR'ECTE>: 04 NMAATMtlE8CAPTlOH

N/A 01 0 l POP\A.ATC>N ~ 02 0 ~{°"TE· I 0 '°'1iNTW. OAU.EOED m ll"Ol"\AATIQllj P01BmAL.L v AFF£CTED: Oil NN'l'IAlM belCM'lOC

Ni ft 100041

'.

2-32

i ~· I

•

I ~

~-¥2¥ffi'Mf'ilP'~ .... ,.., .... ,,...,.,~"'""'""'" ..... ________ _

/! I

I &EPA POTEN'llAL. HA.Z>.Rt>OUI WA.STE SITE l IDIEWTiACA TlON

SITE~ ftE'POiltT pi ~/.TErir1'£N;A PAJllT I-~ OF~~ AMO INCti00ITS ~y N .

i. I L W-~A cx:ieYnOHS ~ ~ ~

I 01 0 J. r».!JW)E TO Fl...OP.A CllrD~!OATE: ' 0 f'OTBffil\L . OAUBlED °' ~-OEIJOW'llON l !: I -r -

I -- 1-J/A .

010K~TOF~ Q2 D 066ERVED (o.t.TE: I D PO"TCJoffi.'.L 0 ALl.£GEO

I ().(~TM~...-_.,,,,_

N/A

I 01 0 L o::>r. ~ "Tl:)ro; Of' FOOO Cl-!AJN Q2 0 089ERVED (o.t.TE I D "°1E.NTIAL 0 AU.EGEO o.. NAAfiA TIVE DESCRIFTlON

I tJ /A 01 0 W lJNSTASlECONT~ENTOFW.a.sTES 02 D Cl8SEfNED (CATE• I 0 POTENTW. 0 AU.EGEO - ""'"'°".__..,, - i........, ~· 03 POPl.ILATO\ F'OTEHTW.l.Y AFFECTED: 04 NAFl'V.Tl'w£ ~

t\J/A 0 N C>AM.A.GE TO OffSIT"E ~RTY 02 0 08SEJNE> (rM TE J 0 POTEHTW. 0 AU.EGEO

04 N.A.RF<.>. Th'E OESOW" rON

N/fr 01 ~CO!"T~'TlOl'< OF SEWERS, STOfM OfU.HS, ~ 020~(rMTE. f'fM'Z- J D llOTEN'TW. ¥AU.EGED 04 Th'E OESCf'FTlON

- .m"'L-~"".s WJ AJ 1'€..F P-~-- Lic;"'lol\)C~,.J""" ~JC./ Au...c,e-oL.7 1>16C-J.+An.6~ J,.,,,} i1J

>TO-(\.N\ -p r1.ifr J ~ •

oi~~DUMPING 02 0 OlllS:Ph£0 (Do\TE: f'J.. ru J 0 POTENTl,t,L _/4-AU.EaED 04 1'M OE:.:::>W' rlON

L i::.l"r'- 1-t"'A T'G'" f'/l.C..- l(;>t4~1,.J 6 /1001-5 1 ~,.l~f h~~ PIS'-~&~ INTD

5)0 (l..,.,.. "'t>rt.q 1..l A L..l-€61:-0 Ly 0 cc.. u /I.. t:'"l:> •

06 OESatFTION C:# »N ~ KHOWN. POTBCTW... Of' AU.£GEO MAZNIOS

- tJ (4

a. TOTAL. ~TlON "OTaiTIAllY ~ 1-11J1<ilOc.>

"-~ -

··~ OIF NFC>ftMATIOt4ic--=--• •·-----

.>c..PH 5

1nnn,,,.. --· - -, -

') -- ".) ')_

&EPA POTENTlAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IOENTl"FICA TION

SITE lNSPECTK>N 01 ST.a.TEI 02 srrestr.:EA PART 4-PaWIT AHO DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION /\JV N

I L PfRWT N'C>RMA TION 01 TYPE OF P£RLIT ~ 02 ~ N.A.l1IER 03 DA TE ISSUED G4 EXF1'\.a. TOo! 0.0. TE 05~

~--~ 04. l9'DES

o-. 9C- -oc. A.IA 0 D. 9'Cl'IA

OE. -~~STAT\1$

0 F. 8PCC 11'\.A.N

~ G STATE 1-J ~f"JDE5 J-JYOo7>>74 1/z,7}¥0 4-}•)?'5 OH. LOCAL,_,.1

OL OTHER1-..1

0.J. HONE

Ill SITE DESCRIPTION 01 STOf'.AGE. 'OISPOS.a.L ~ r1.,.,., -'11 02 Nl/Ol..Jf(f 03 I.HT OF lEASUFIE ()4 TRE.A.TMEN! to-:*,,.,.. _,.J 050nER

JI"- SURF"ACE IMPOUNDMENT 4- OA..~TlON r· 8IJ1lDINGS Of.I SITE 0 8 PIL.ES 0 9. UNDERGROUND NJECTION ~C. ORUMS. '4130\IE GROUND 25 0 C. CHEMIC.A.lA'HYSICAl. ~O. TANK, ABOVE GROUND 7 0 0. 810l.OGICAL lo£. T JHlf.., BELOW GROUND I 0 E. WASTE OIL ~ESSING 06 1'PEA OF SITC

0 F. LNCIFIU 0 F. SOL.VENT RECOVERY D G.LNO=AAM 0 G. OTHER RECYCL.H31RECOVERY 0 .~ -0 H. Of"EN OOMP 0 H.OTHER ..

-.-i 0 I.OTHER ~·

OT COOAIENTS

-

IV. CONT AIHMENT 01 COl'(T NNJENT OF W~ rr>w:a -i

0 A. AOEQl.JATE. SECURE 0 8. MODERATE J{c. WAOEQUATE. ~ 0 0. HSECURE, l>GOUNO, DANGEROUS

02 CIESCM'T10H OF CR.MS. ~. lJE!'IS. BAAFIERS, ETC.

6'' i3 en.-""' t tto TE"t.. T>.J G -p 00/'l.. ',.l c..ASE () f ;~Door\- T)l;"' >c- () /'\- i:> ti,..u,...... JPIL'-

V.ACC~

01 WASTE £A3L. Y ,t.CCE$Sel F; y/YES Cl NO m~

Yl.. loOCJR-CES Of' INFOft»A TIOH ra._... --· • • - - ---J

5c..D H 5

10QOe13

2-34

&EPA rc>ramA.L HAZAAOOUS W ~-'TE mE l IOGffiFlCA TJON

SlTE ~SP'ECTIOW ~ ~lfl°2~R PMT 15· ~ATEft. ~~ 1--~ 9Ni:~Oh>i:SiTA.L DATA

L~WATEl'~Y ~

01 TV?t: O/F~~y •STATUS ~N«::ETOOO'E r::a---.--1 - .T

~ACE 11116..l.. ~ lff'ECTED ~ ()CJ!iM Nn" A.0 ··~ ~{ 8-D C.D -

A.. 0·8" "'"'> ~ C.D D.D E.O F.D •• 4'NJ -· a. Qlll()(H)W ATER

01 ~ATelueEI<~~_,

j' A.. OK.Y ~ FOfl; 0FW«NJ 0 a.CIPN<:Nl 0 C.~~NWJATOC 0 0. NOT IJ!IEO, 1H.J!1EAa.E ,,._. __ , -----1 ~~~TION -----}

02 ~iDlol ~IN QA:JlKl WATEl'I f6()0b

°'DIST /llHCE.TO IEN'IEST ~ W A'TBI WEU. o. ~ ~

°' tJEl'T>1 TO (IPOl..>CIWA TEJll 06 Dl'IECTIOH OF QPO...H:;#lATEJI FLOW OI DEPT1'i TO~ OT~Y'EU> oesoi..e~~

OFJ(~ OF~

2. \ '9tl 5ovTet t:><\S} till" U::ijkr.J.Mf'l .(gDdJ ,?'YES CJ NO

01 CJE.SOlllFTO; OF WEU.S~-· -· _..,_., _e ___ .,_., 1'v~LIC.. P\J ATC)'t. 5vP~t.y ""'t:'"l...I.. f Fo ...... ~. FAY"l-M I .l ' t> A I. t l>n~ rl"•L'1 OA~yu..>, .s. ttu ~ ll ,.> 6 j'O ,.)

, , ....., A \"e"'\.. l)1J Jn.\' TJ I Nt.JN\~v.> lr>Qu1~1 1\~ &,...> t\..1-J I 11t..4,~1tno~ DF-

C. lo:°)"l\~i\:--....."€"J ~ G~C-F Coun.S E, WI~ r,.J "") "''"-E J 0 t= s,n:. 1 c 1'!EC>l""'3E 4l'E>. ,,~WEA

CJ YES I co.AENTS 0 Y£S I OQt - '0ITS CJ NO CJ NO

N. SURFACE WATER

01 llJllFACE WA'TBI UM:~ -

0-A.~.~TION 0 8. lflAGATOl, ~y cc.~~ ~D. NOT~y U15Et> ~ W-'"TCR SOURCE MPORT/IXT RESOURCES

az ~y llff'£CTB> a::>CIESOIF WA"TBI

NAME: A I CCIED DET AHCE TO STE

~D~b ~Ov.J~ 0 ...., 0 {1111)

CJ {1111)

V. DE»OGR.VHIC A.ND "'~TI INFOAMATION

01 TOTAL ~Tl:Jllj wm-< F.:un .. ..f+)

OZ CIST »CE TO IEAl"E.ST l"CPIJl..A Toe

CHE (1J11&£ OF~ TWO (%) IA.ES OtF STE ~OFSTE 0 -<-~ A. 12,....J~ •• 10 zoo C. /~7o"3 f 111111

Cl~- m~-=-- m.~-

OJ l&.W:l'I C1F • • Ql«l8 wm. TWO IZ1 -.S C1F llTE 06 CSTMCETO llEN'IEST Qff'.-n; a.-.J»G

700-1000 0 ..., OI l'O"..l.A'TDt ...,.._ VICNTY C1F ST"E~----------.-.-. ..-,... __,. ___

5 • l"E"'" \j l-.:>C..Al'El> /~ f~Pv.S f't"\.1AC.... (0 Pt<L-~ .+n,..£)&. A\...or.J4 '1ln4 -- - av SJ'"' fiJS~

l'l u """"~" S CD1"1""1&....,.,__c...1At-- /'f..,.J~ ""' ~ \J F /'\ c. ~ ,.J,.. . -

) I) 12-12-0 v ~ y .. "'I,) a-f Cc:w-. ~'I!:" f ~o 4€J IOt::)<l r714 L. ~s.

1000!121 9' A l'Ol'M 2071>-1 a (T .. 1 I

2-35

• POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SlTE l IO£NTIFIC A. T!ON

&EPA SITE IHSPECTlON REPORT 0~~1°2 SlTENm-R PART 5-WATER. DEMOGRAPHIC, Afro ENVIROtt~ENTAL DATA

/ Vt. E>NIRONUEMT Al ~.:f'OR."4A TION 01 ~OF L.ll'CSJ.TURA TED ZON£ IC'-" .,..I

.. D A.10-•-10-•cm1NC _,Jf s.10-•-10-•cm1..c 0 C.1Cr' - 10-> omfMC 0 0. GAEA TER THAH 10-2 cm/MC . -a2 ~OF 8EDAOO'.ic-ca-1

~ !"A.. MPERME"8LE D 8. RELAlML Y l..'f'£RMEABl.E 0 C. PIELA. TNEl Y PERMEASl..E 0 0. VERY P£RME.A..BLE ...... ..., 10-• .Oft.".MJC) 110-•-10-•-1 - 1•0-2 - 10-• --=1 ~-- 10-2 ...,-..Cl -

03 OEP"Tti TO llEDROCK 04 OEP"Trt OF COh'T ~TEO SOii.. ZONE ~SOil.pH

i:~oo tftl U 1 I ~t'1Qv.Jri (ft) l;.,r1 tYtDL-UVI

oe NET F'fiECPIT A TION OT 00£ YEAA 24 ~~AU. Cle SLOPE

£..7 SITE SLOf>E I DIRECTION OF SITE St.OPE I TERR>JN AVERAGE SLOf'E IS- ~} ('\) '- 3 "' 5 o v\°)1 <-3 " 09 Fl.000 POTE!oliW. \D

SITCIS~ YEAR FLOOOPt.AIN Cl SITE IS ON BARRIER ISLAND, C0"5T AL t«3ti HAZA.RO AP.EA, RIVERINE FLCX>OW AY

11 DIST AHCE TO WETL.AHOS I~..,,. -i \2 DIST »ICE TO CAIT1C-'L MA!llT AT to1 ........_w ..,....i

ESTUARINE OTHER - (mi}

'- -A. (mi) 8. (nwl END~O sPECES: -

13 L.AN0 USE: fol V1CIN1TY

DISTANCE TO: AESIDENTIAL. AAE.-.S, NATIONAUSTATE PARKS, AGRICUL TURAl LANDS

. COMMERC1AL.~STRIAL FORESTS, Of\ WIUXJFE RESERVES PRIME A/3 LANO NlLANO

C> f,(_ - -A. (ml} •• 1'911) c. (ftli} o. (1111)

1' OE:SCRIPTION OF SITE fol REUTION TO~ TOPOGRAPHY

sire- I .S I~ PA..J&J) A(\..~"")'\ s v 12. /Lo...,~ ., €""'!:> G '/ O~"'r'\. 'ii.u1t...1>1.Jl..J • - ~8-1'-nvny ~'-Ar Th°"t'\,~v.J

·.

VLSOUACES Of' INFORMATION /QI_---. .. , .. --.---

S' c.:p M--5

2-36 100045

r -.

@EPA POl::iM11Al KA.Vu'WOOS WASTE &rr£ L l>9ITACA noN

- ..-rE ~CTIOH REPORT o;_r~nol02 •it~

I - - - . ~MIT I-~ AhlO FED INFORHA T10N / I

·1.~T~ :

~1:Y"E ~~Of' 02 ~CIEHTTO ~ ElrTw>. TED °"TE

•• ~T~ ,_Jo,..J f · ... ~

~1S ""11..>a..E I

.. ~-

-.irFAa{~TBl'I -I -

WASTE :

NP.

I 111.HOff-

IPLl.

klL

I ~ATON ,

cme

II.. FlEl.ll ~Tl.KEH 01 TYPE Cl2 o::w.e<rS

,,.J /} ,.J ~

IV. PHOTOO-R>.PHS .\HO M~

01 T'9'E 0 ~ Cl AERIAL I ca t1 a.stc:IO'r' OF -----~~ I °' l..OCA llOJoj OF 11&...-s

~:s ,,..., ·o o l> ..., A l"\.-:2 .-t:..LY~e c.o ,..> J " \..-TJ't ,..n-J .-

V. OTl'EJ' FlELD DATA COLLECTED,_ - -1 t

.

VI.. 801..J11Ca OF H'Of!MA TlOfi io. - - •·•·· - -. ----

SCDH-f

~ 2-37

F11.-1FJ

. °' 1 .... ,nn4c.~ tJ i,.J t.; '\}

• &mt\ POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE l. IDDITIFICATlON

SITE INSPECTION REPORT 0~~ 102 ~N!AR PART 7 - OWNER lNFORMA TION

/ . L CUfl;P.aIT O~ ftAAEHT COM?AHY "'--'"!

01 NA.tAE ro+e~R 06 N.a.ME DllO+S~R

j8"Ul--O Lp f2-o I)./ I Pa..ts. 1)3 ~ 6DOfESS ~ 0 -- fllFD '· -.1 rSCCOCE 1 0 STREET #,DORESS ~ o ....... WO 1. otc.J

r1SICCOOE - t{,f!. C EN 'l't"l.A L- Av£. -. 06CIT7

r~YTE 07 ZIPCOOE 12 ClTY - r3STATE 1•Z1PCOOE

FA<2-Nl1,Ji-PAL-t 117:Js 01 iu..w£ 02o+8~ oe NAME Oil o+ 8 NUMBCR

~3STRE£T~(/00 ....... lllFD•.-J rSICcooe

10STREETAOClA£SS1/0 0 ....... /llFO '· ocr:.1 r1SICCOOE

~CtrY rSTATE 07 Z1PCOOE 12 CITY r3STATE t•Z1PCOOE

oi~ 02 o+ a HUMBER 08MAME 09 O+ 8 NUMBER

i03 Sll£ET ADORESS ti' 0 - II/FD•. -.J l°'saccooe 10 STREET ADORE SS 11' o a. • .., •. 0tc I

l,,SICCOOE

~CITY rSTATE 07 Z1PCOOE 12CtrY r3STATE t•XJPCOOE

Cl~ 02 o+a NUMBER 08 NAME 090+1N~R

03 ST1£ET AIXlF£SS ,,. 0 ....... ,,,0 •. Ok.} l°'SICCOOE

10 STJ'EET ADORESS 1/0 0 - M'D • . .,. I r13ICCOOE

0$aTY loeSTAr 07 DPCOOE 12aTY r3STATE 1'ZF COOE

IL PREVIOUS OWNER(S) ;:.. - -=- -J IV. lllEAL TY OWNER(S) "- • - -=- -1

Ol fU.ME 02o+B~R 01 NAME 02o+B~R

03 5Tl'!EET AIXlRESS (l'.O. -· fllFD •. -.) I O.SICCOOE 03 ST1'!EET AOOAESS 11' o. -· "'0 •. ""'·i l°'SICCOOE

06 aTY rSTATE 07ZFOOOE (QC> CITY IOllSTATI: 07 ZJPCOOE

01- !02 o+a M.MeE~ 01NMIE 02 o+ a HUW&ER

03S1l'EET~11'.0 -· fllFD •.-.I l°'acCOOE 03 SlllEET AOOAESS I'" o. -· fllFD •. osc J I°' SIC COCIE

06 ClTY rSTATI: !071:1' COCE 05aTY IOISTAll: 07ZFCOOE

.. 01- 020+•~ ID'- 020+•~

03 sn.E£T AODl'£35 ~ o. -- fllFD •• -1 l°'SICCOOE 03 ST1'IE£T AOCfllESS (I'. 0. -· fllFD I. -} l°'SICCOOE

ID&aTT rSTATE

071:1'COOE 05aTY r STATE 07 1:1' COOE

-Y. SOUflK;E.I ~ .U:OAMATIOtt i.::a--.-...... - - ---

.)CDH5

100047 2-38

.

POTENTIAL HAZAR:OOUS WASTE 8rTE LD~A.not;

&EPA SITE IH$PECTIOH REPORT o;_:ryn:j02NfAR · -ftMT I ·ot"atA.TOft ~ T10N

1

L~~T~

,.__, _____ Of'EJ\ATC>ft'S PAJE:l(T ~#ff ,__.

l O\~ . ., r C>+a N..MZSI \ 0 ""1.£ r\C>+l~R

4; . -! 03~~ ,..0 --•.-.J IOCllCOOOE 11~ JliDOfllE:aS r.0.-.-.1.-.i rllCCOOE -

"t OfiaTY rll"ATEr7 zPOOOE HCITY . f' ll"ATEre ZIP COOE

' Cll YEAl'll OF OPf1V. nooi IOI IWoE OI' OWHEJI

a.~~ OPERATC>f\(S} ~------·---- PREYK>C.JS ~TORS' PAADCl" COMP~S r--.; 0\ lllAME 1021>+•.......,. 1011ME r\C+l~R

03ST'l'IE£T~ ,,..0.-.-•.-1 rlCCOOE ti aiw::ET ~ ,_.o.-. WI>•. -.1 IU SICCOOE

()& O"TY r aTA TEr7 ZP CODE 14CITY rllTAT£1 \IZF C00E

Cll ~OF ~:TlOf; IOI ~ OF OW'IE1' tUWoG iMS l'E1'IOC

01 NAME rc-+a......eER \0- I" O+ I N:JM8E R

- :..ITl'IEE:T~~.o -.WtJ•.-.1 IC>411C~ 12Sll£ET ACICJfllESS ~.0 -· llOR>I. --1 rl llCCOOE Cll QTY loaSTATErT zP OOOE 1' CITY rlSTATEr• ZIP COOE

Ol l'EAl'IS OF OPE1\t.~ loe~O/F~~ne~

-01 IUolllE laze>+•~ 10llMIE I \1 O+. IC.AlllER

03 lll£ET ~,-.o.-. -·· -.i 10. llCCCDE 12 STl'll£T ~ fl'.O. --·· -1 rlCOOOE 06 CITY raTATErT zPOOCE 14CITY r . .,. ... TE.

1,. ZP OOOE

Cll ~OF Of"SY.~ r OI ~OF ~f:All9GTl9 ~

IV.IOURCD~WORMA'TIOH1Qt __ ,..._.--.---

. 5 C D..+.5 . ' -- -

.,.. l'QNll 207'C>-t a (7 ... t >

2-39 100048

-.

• SEPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFICATION

SITE INSPECTION RE.PORT O~ST;;Ersrr~/A!:R PARTl-OEHERATORITRANSPORTER lNFORMATION

' I

a. Off.SITE OEHERA TOR 01 NAME 02o+l~R

03 ~-NXlf'IESS fl'.0 -- /llFP#. Ole.) 104SICCOOE - --. 05Cttl' loe STATE 07 "bP C(X)E -. 11. OFF-SITE QENERATOR(S} 01 NAME 02 0+11 HLJO.eER 01 !<.A.ME 02 O+ 8 NUMBER

03 STREET ADOl'IESS f" 0 -·MD'• «<:.J 104SICCOOE 03 STREET ADOF\ESS r• O ao., /llFD •. - J 104SICCOOE

O!>CITY !Cle STATE or ZJP cooe 05 CITY Ice STATE 07 Z1P COO£

01 ""-ME 02 O ... llHUMSER 01 NAME 02 0 ... 8 NUlolSER

03STREET ADOf\ESS r• o -· llfFD•. -1 104SICCOOE 03 STREET ~SS ti' o -· l<FO '· -.J 104SICCOOE

~CITY rSTATE 07ZJPCOOE ~CITY r STATE 07 ZJP COO£

IV. TIV.NSPORTER(S) 01~ 020+1MUMSER 01 NAME 02 o+ll NUMBER

03 snEET ADOFIESS ,,. 0 -· //flTJ#, --I 104Sl:COOE 03 STREET AOOF\ESS 11' O ....... l'fFO •.Ole I l°'SICCOOE Q5 CITY 106STATE 071:JPCOOE 06CITY rSTATE

071:/P COOE

01 -"'AME 02 o+ll HUloeER 01 NAME 020+1~R

03 STREET A00RESS 11' O -. llF!l •. --1 104!1COOOE 03 STREET AOOR£SS fl'.O. -. /llFP •. -.J l°'SICCOOE ~CITY rSTATC 07ZPCOOE Q5CITY Ice STATE 01 DP cooe

V.$0\JRCES Of' IHFORMATION '"""--···•··--___ _..,

scD{4~

' -

8'A ~ 207C>U (7-a1)

2-40 100049

Et*W* mm·

• ·&e¥\ --··· -- POTB-tll.U KA2AJtt>OOS WASTE SITE L~no+I

.-r£ ~TI()H ~T °'~Y-i02

1m - -,- •urr 10 -PUT p~.:;e ACTM"T1iE$ 7

I.. PA.IT ~;M ACTMTQ N0 H1~:J -e~ ~ o6Y! '5.t Acnv1.-ht~ Kn.00Ji1 01 0 .... "9Alal\ 81..PP'L y Cl..08ED 02Do\TE ' 03~

--~ -~

• 01 0 IL~ W1'TB\ lU'f'l.Y ~ 02Dol.TE 03~ .-CE«-rTDH

I 01 0 C ~ W1'TER 8J'P\..Y ~ 020iJ,.TE 03~Y Oil DEBCAPTlOH

01 DO §"LUI)""'~~ 020ATE Q3 /1113EN:,Y

j °"' C£9(>W" '°" 01 DE. ~ .......... TEO 90L ~ 02 OA'TE 03 ""3E>CY

I °" c:ESCFF'TION

01 0 F. WASTE AEP 1'D<.N3ED 02 OA'TE 03 "'3EJ'¥;Y 04te:O+'llON

I -~~~

02 Oil.TE 03 "'3E>CY

' -

01 0 I'<. Ct< 5rTE ~ 02Dol.TE 03NJEJCY 01 ~904'TION

01 D L "' ST\.J ~ 1'£An.e.IT 020ATE 03NJeCY CM CE!!JC:AFTION

---01 a .1. .. 5T\J .,. OQIC&!. TP1EA w 02Do\TE 03//DeCY °' CJE!JC M'10ol

01 D K. .. STlJ ~ Tl'EAn.EHT 02Do\TE Q3N3EJC'f 04 CE31:s:F? ION

01 D L.. ec.N"9..UTION 02Do\TE 03NJIEHCY 0.. OEIJ! .... TIOH

01 0 .. ~ WA:>~TillEAn.en" 02 OiJ,.TE 03N3BC;Y 04L£1k>W>ION . 01 0 M. QJTOR: WAU.S 021».TE 03KJE>CY 0. DEa ,,.llCN

01 0 Q..~~/IU.W1'l"B"~ 021».TE 03NJE!HCY oe..,._.._!ION

01 0 ... OJT()Fy: ~ 02 DJ.'TE 03NEC:V °" ODl:;M> I ION

01 0 Q. a..e.'!U'FACIE CllTOFF WAU. 02Dit.TE 03fl08CY Oil CIE9C:M'l CM

100050~

·.

,D'EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WA.STE SITE L~ATION

SITE tNSPECTIOH REPORT !01 6T"'TEI oz BITE~ PART10·PASTRE~E~CTIV1TtES ,....'>'-/ N

I I PAST RES?OH.SE ACT!V!T6 ~

,. . 01 0 R. BA.ffllER WALLS CONSTAIJCTED 02.0ATE 03~ .. 04~

JtfDS.~ 02DATE 03N3ENOr' ... ~ . - -..,, 01- 0 T. BOLK T ~ REP>.P:ED 02DATE 03~Y 04 OESCflF"l ION

01 0 U GROUT CURT .A.JN CONSTRUCTED 02. DATE 03~'( °' DESCAIPTlON

01 0 II. BOTIOM SEAl.ED 020ATE 03 N::.CNCY 04 DESCRFTlON

01 0 W GAS CONTROL 02.0ATE ' 03 ll.G€NCY 04 OESCRIPTlON

01 0 x. ~ CONT'ROl 020ATE 03 AGENCY 04 OESCRIPTION

01 CY. LEACHATE TREATMENT 020ATE 03 /1.13CJ¥:;'( 04 OESCRIPT)C)N

01 C Z flAE>. EV ACU_.,TEO 020ATE 03 "'3ENCY 04 OESCAF'TION

01 0 1 . ACCESS TO SITE RESTfttCTEO 02.DATE 03'"3ENCY 04 OESCAIPTION

~

01 0 2. POPULATION RElOCATEO 020A"TE 03/IDEHCY 04 CESCAIPTON

01 0 3. cm-ER REMEDIAL ACTMTIES 02 D.t."TE 03N:JSCY

°' OESCAFT10N

"t

a. IOUACES Of' IHFOfUIATIOH tca....---. ..... --. --· -

Sc Drt 5

EP"'f'ONol 207C>-13 {7~11

2-42

. 10'0.0·51

I

1- 0' 0 7

hA.-71c.~ 17

100052'

2-43

1 l ! ~-

' • l

l .

I I

. ! I i -. i

• Woodward-Clyde Consua~mts, Inc .

3.0

SITE HISTORY

Tronic Plating Company Inc. has operated continuously from July 1968 to

the present (SCDHS, 1968). The history of the site previous to 1968 is unknown.

Operations at the site include electroplating, anodizing, and etching operations

primarily for the electronics industry (Benson and Burns, 1974). A State Pollution

Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit was issued to Tronic Plating

Company on April I, 1980 (NYSDEC, 1980).

In June 1980, an Order on Concent was issued to Tronic Plating Co., Inc.

for discharging industrial wastes to the ground water from leaching pools. Tronic

Plating Co., Inc. agreed to obtain a part 360 permit and clean out the leaching

pools (NYSDEC, 1980). As of January 1983, a 360 permit has not been obtained,

(SCDHS, 1983). The leaching basin was found to be contaminated with copper,

silver iron, zinc, lead, and cadmium, (SCDHS, I 979-1982). Also heavy metal

contamination is suspected in a storm drain located northeast of the building,

(SCDHS, 1982).

In 1982, operations at the facility consisted of the storage of waste acids

and cyanides, in a collection pit, above ground storge tanks and in 55 gallons

drums inside the facility building. Process cooling water is discharged to a

sanitary sewer. The wastes were picked up by various industrial scavengers.

Waste flow to the scavengers was 29,800 gallons from January through August

1982, (SCDHS, 1982).

C634.3/l l 9 3-1 • 100053

e

4.1 Site Area Surface Features


4.0

SITE DATA

The site of the Tronic Plating Company Inc. is located in a generally flat

area with an average, ground surface slope of less than 3 percent.

There are no surface water features in the vicinity of the site. The area

surrounding the site is paved and surface run-off is via existing storm drains.

The predominant land use in the area is industrial. The site is surrounded

by existing manufacturing and commercial facilities. Large cemeteries are

located to the south and east of the site vicinity.

4.2 Site Hydrogeology

4..2. l Ground Water Occurrence. Ground water in the site area occurs in

unconsolidated sediments of Pleistocene and Cretaceous age. These deposits are

approximately 1300 feet thick and overlie Precambrian crystalline bedrock (Taney,

1961; Jensen and Soren, 1974). The low hydraulic conductivity bedrock is

considered to be the bottom of the ground water reservoir (Jensen and Soren,

1974).

The site area is directly underlain by glacial outwash deposits consisting

of coarse sand and gravel. These deposits comprise the upper glacial .aquifer

and are probably less than 100 feet thick. Ground water in the upper glacial

aquifer occurs at an approximate elevation of 66 feet above MSL (Donaldson and

C634.4/ l l 9 4-1 100054


Koszalka, 1983) which translates to approximately 31 feet below the ground

surface at the site (USGS, 1979b). The water table has a hydraulic gradient of

about 8 feet per mile (Kimmel and Braids, 1980) in a southeasterly direction.

The next major water bearing unit underlying the site area is the Cretaceous

Magothy Formation. The Magothy aquifer is a major aquifer throughout most

of Long Island and is hydraulically linked to the upper glacial aquifer. The

Magothy aquifer consists of predominantly fine to coarse sand interbedded with

clay, silt and lignite. It is believed to be approximately 750 feet thick in the

site area (Taney, 1961; Jensen and Soren, 1974).

The Magothy aquifer directly overlies the clay member of the Cretaceous

Raritan Formation. The clay in turn overlies and confines the Lloyd Sand member

of the Raritan Formation, which constitutes the deep confined aquifer in the

site area (Taney, 1961; Jensen and Soren, 1974). The Lloyd Sand consists of

stratified beds of sand, gravel, silt and clay.

Underlying the members of the Raritan Formation is crystalline bedrock of

Precambrian age. The bedrock surface dips approximately 60 feet per mile to

the southeast, as do the overlying Cretaceous formations (Taney, 1961, Franke

and McClymonds, 1982).

4.2.2 Ground Water Quality. Ground water quality in Suffolk County is generally

good, typically containing less than 100 ppm dissolved solids (51 mg/l in the

vicinity of the Babylon landfill). Local contamination by domestic waste, industrial

waste, and road salt has caused some alteration of the regional quality of the

ground water (Kimmel and Braids, 1980).

Water quality samples from the Babylon landfill show that the water in

the upper glacial aquifer has been contaminated by domestic waste with high

concentrations of ammonia, nitrate, calcium, sodium, sulfate, and chloride

(Kimmel and Braids, 1980).

C634.4-/ 119 4-2 1 (\(\(\"~~

1 .. .s - : .... : J ~)

Woodward-Clyde Consui!ants, Inc.

A plume of leachate-enriched water eminating southeastward from the

Babylon landfill has been delineated on the basis of specific conductance. Specific

conductance ranges between 1,000 and 2,000 micromhos (umho) throughout the

plume; however values between 200 and 400 umho have been measured in wells

outside the boundary of the plume in the vicinity of the site area (Kimmel and

Braids, 1980).

4.3 Past Sampling and Analysis

Past sampling and analysis at the site has been confined to samples of the

waste collected from the leaching pools and above ground tanks (SCDHS, 1979;

SCDHS, 1980). All available analytical results are included in Appendix B.

Sampling and water quality analysis from existing wells in the vicinity of

the site has been conducted for a study of the leachate plume from the Babylon

landfill (Kimmel and Braids, 1980).

There has been no reported soil or air quality sampling for the site area.

C634.4/119 4-3 10005$


5.0

DAT A ADEQUACY

Available data were generally adequate for HRS scoring of the Tronic

Plating Company site. Based on these data, the route of major concern is ground

water, with a score of 71.97. Ground Water Route Characteristics, Waste

Characteristics, and Targets all contributed to this relatively high score.

C634-.5/ l l 9 5-I 100057

•

6.1 Objectives

Woodward·Clyde Consu:tarits, Inc .

6.0

WORK PLAN

Because there has been no reported previous sampling of ground water and

soils at the site, the objective of this proposed work plan is to collect essential

field information required to adequately prepare a final HRS Score and

recommendations for remedial action. For this site, the work plan will primarily

address questions concerning ground water flow and quality and extent of the

soil contamination.

6.2 Field Investigation Plan

6.2.1 Geophysical Studies. A geophysical survey utilizing the terrain conductivity

technique will be performed at the site. This technique may be utilized to

locate any subsurface plumes resulting from leakage of the underground tanks.

For this purpose, measurements will be taken around the site vicinity especially

in the south and east direction which is downgradient of the facility. Ground

water flow is assumed to be in a sq_utheasterly direction. Furthermore, these

measurements could help identify anomalous conductivity distributions that may

indicate buried metallic objects such as tanks and pipes. The data will be plotted

on maps and contoured. These contour maps will provide the basis for defining

the number and location of g:-vund water monitoring wells.

It is anticipated that a two person team will require two days to perform

the conductivity survey, with readings taken for exploration depths of

approximately 50 feet.

C634.6/l I 9 6-1 1ooosS

Woodward·Clyde Corysultants, Inc.

6.2.2 Monitoring Wells

6.2.2.1 Instal lotion. Monitoring wells will be installed to provide data

pertinent to both water chemistry and characterization of the stratigraphy and

ground water regime at the site. It is recommended that three monitoring we! Is

be installed, at the approximate locations shown in Figure 2. Finalized well

locations will be determined after the geophysical data has been plotted and

reduced. These locations will depend also on the utility search in order to avoid

underground obstacles and on accessibility behind the plant building.

One well (MW-I) will be installed at a presumed upgradient location, on

the north side of the facility. This well will provide background data on the

ground water flowing into the area.

Two monitoring wells will be required to monitor downgradient flow

directions and water quality. Wells MW-2 and MW-3 will be installed at the

approximate locations shown in Figure 2. These two locations will provide an

opportunity for interception of a contaminant plume, from the wastes which have

leaked from underground storage tanks.

All monitoring wells will be installed so as to sample the upper 10 feet of

ground water. It is assumed that the ground water table will be within 35 feet

of the ground surface and that total well depth will not exceed 50 feet.

Borings will be advanced through the overburden by 6-inch 1.0. ho! low stem

augers or driven casing, with continuous split spoon sampling through the upper

15 feet of soil, and at 5-foot intervals below 15 feet. Soil samples will be

classified in the field by a hydrogeologist. Selected samples will be sent to our

geotechnical laboratory for grain size analysis and Atterberg Limits testing. To

maximize information on any volatile organic contaminants, headspace analyses

will be conducted on soil samples, using a portable gas chromatograph. These

data will be used to evaluate relative concentrations of organic contaminants in

various stratigraphic horizons.

C634.6/l 19 6-2 100059.


Slotted 3-inch I.D. PVC wel I screen will be installed over I 0-foot intervals

in each well, with a riser of flush joint, threaded, 3-inch l.D. PVC pipe. Where

necessary, risers will extend at least 3 feet above the ground surface to prevent

contamination by surface water flooding. A grovel pock will be completed to

approximately 2 feet above the top of the screen, where a I-foot bentonite seal

will be installed. To further assure that water samples will be representative

of the screened interval, the remaining annular space will be grouted, and a

protective steel casing will be installed. After installation, the wells will be

developed by pumping, to remove any fine grained material.

We estimate that 9 days will be required to conduct the drilling and well

installation operations. This schedule includes time for surveying of well

elevations, organic vapor analysis and slug-type permeability testing.

6.2.2.2 Water Elevations. Ground water depths will be measured at

- the time of well development and again at the time of pumping. Relative well

elevations will be surveyed by WCC personnel. Water elevations will be plotted

and used to develop contours of the ground water table at the site. Based on

this map, the direction(s) of ground water flow will be calculated.

Flow and gradient data will be fundamental input in quantifying site

conditions and will be assessed together with plume geometries (if any) inferred

from geophysical survey data.

6.2.2.3 Aquifer Testing. "Slug"-type permeability tests will be conducted

in each newly installed well to evaluate the permeabiltiy of materials spanning

the screened interval. The method is a rapid m..,,,,ns by which the in-situ

permeability in the immediate vicinity of a monitoring well can be approximated.

C634.6/J 19 6-3

Woodward·Clydc Consuaanis, Inc.

The test does not involve pumping of potentially contaminated water, and results

generally suffice for ground water flow analysis.

6.2.3 Sampling and Analysis Plan

6.2.3.1 General Plan. Sampling and analysis plan to be supplied by NYSDEC.

6.2.3.2 Sampling Parameters. Previous sampling at the site is limited to

the waste materials at the surface. Therefore, the laboratory analysis will focus

on chemical screening techniques to determine the range of concentration and

the migration of contamination in ground water and contamination of subsurface

soils. Sampling parameters include heavy metals and cyanide. Sample types and

chemical parameters are summarized in Table 6-1.

It is estimated that one day in the field will be required to collect samples

for analytical testing of the ground water and soils.

6.2.3.3 Sampling Locations. One water sample and one soil sample

from each of the three ground water monitoring wells will be analyzed. Results

of each pair of analyses will be compared to evaluate any downward migration

of contaminants through soil. Ground water analyses will be evaluated in terms

of other hydrogeologic data to evaluate the presence, distribution, and migration

directions of any ground water contaminant plumes.

6.3 Health and Safety Plan

Heolth and Safety Plan to be supplied by NYSDEC.

6.4 Cost Estimate Costs for Phase II work were developed based on assumptions, rates, and

charges described in WCC's cost proposal submitted to NYSDEC on 29 October

1982. Costs have been grouped by task, and estimates are presented in Tables 6-2,

6-3, 6-4, 6-5, and 6-6. Costs my be affected by the contents of the sampling

and analysis plan or the health and safety plan to be supplied by NYSDEC. The

C634.6/l 19 6-4

10')06l

Woodward·Clyde Consuitants, lnc.

total estimated cost for Phase II investigations at the Tronic Plating Company

site is $22,584.

C634.6/l 19 6-5 100062

Table 6-1.

Sample Type

Ground Water

Soil

C634T6-l/l 19

Woodward·Clyde ConsuHan-ls, Inc.

PROPOSED CHEMICAL ANALYSES AT THE TRONIC PLATING CO MP ANY SITE.

ANALYSES

Metals

x

x

6-5

Remarks

One sample at each of three wells.

One sample from unsaturated zone at each of three wells.

1000s~

Woodward-Clyde Consultants, In

TABLE 6-2. GEOPHYSICAL STUDIES' COSTS.

1. Direct Material a. Purchased Parts b. Subcontract Items c. Other

2. Material Overhead

3. Direct Labor Senior Staff Engineer/

Geologist/Scientist

4. Labor Overhead Labor Overhead

5. Special Testing

Estimated Hours

40

0 H Rate

120%

Rate/ Hour

12.62

Estimated Cost

505

Total Direct Labor

X Base

505 606

Total Labor Overhead

6. Special Equipment - Terrain Conductivity Equipment (EM-34)

7. Travel a. Transportation b. Subsistence

8. Consultants

9. Other Direct Costs

10.

25 120

Total Travel

·Total Consultants

Total Direct Costs and Overhead

11. General and Administrative Expense (rate 15% of Cost Element No's. 1, 3, 4-, 7, 9)

12. Royalties

13.

14. Fee 15.

C634T6-2/ 119

Sub Total

166 Total Estimated Cost

6-6

Estimated Cost

$ 505

$ 606

$ 400

$ 145

$1,656

$ 188

$1,844

$2,010

I

100064

•

100065

TABLE 6-3. Woodward·Clyde ConsuH~mts, Inc.

DRILLING/WELL INSTALLATION COSTS.

Total Estimated Estimated

Cost Cost 1. Direct Material

a. Purchased Parts b. Subcontract Items c. Other

2. Material Overhead

3. Direct Labor Senior Staff Engineer/

Geologist/ Scientist


5. Special Tes ting

6. Special Equipment

$ 7,555

Total Direct Material

Estimated Hours

90

Rate/ Hour

12.62 1136

Total Direct Laboe

0 H Rate X Base

12096 1, 136 1,363


Century Organic Vapor Analyzer Photovac lOAlO Gas Chromatograph

250 450


8. Consultants

9. Other Direct Costs

10.

Total Special Equipment

76 420

Total Travel

Total Consultants


11. General and Administrative Expense (rate 1596 of Cost Element No's. 1, 3, 4, 7, 9)

12. Royalties

13.

14. Fee 15.

C634T6-3/119

Sub Total

1,155 Total Estimated Cost

6-7

$ 7,555

$ 1,136

$ 1,363

$ 700

$ 496

$ 11,250

$ 1,583

$ 12,833

$ 13,988

100066

•

--

Woodward-Clyde Consultattis, Inc.

TABLE 6-4. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS COSTS.

1. Direct Material a. Purchased Parts b. Subcontract Items c. Other

Estimated Cost

$ 900

Total Estimated

Cost

Total Direct Materials $900 2. Material Overhead

3. Direct Labor Senior Staff Engineer I

Geologist/ Scientist


5. Special Testing

Estimated Rate/ Hours Hour

10 11.51.j. 115

Total Direct Labor

0 H Rate X Base

12096 115 138


6. Special Equipment - Pumps, Bailers


8. Consultants

9. Other Direct Costs Sample Shipment

10.

25

Total Travel

Total Consultants

250

Total Other Direct Costs



12. Royalties

13.

14.. Fee 15.

C634T6-9/ 1l9

Sub Total


6-8

$ 115

$ 138

$1,092

$ 100

$ 25

$ 250

$2,620

$ 214

$2,834

$3,089

¥ '·

-

Woodward-Clvde Consulfants, Inc.

TABLE 6-5. REPORT PREPARATION COSTS.

Estimated

- Cost 1. Direct Material

a. Purchased Parts b. Subcontract Items c. Other

2. Material Overhead Estimated Rate/

Hours Hour 3. Direct Labor

Senior Staff Engineer/ Geo lo gist/ Scientist 30 12.62 379

Drafts person 10 10.24 102 Typist 3 8.44 2.5

L

Total Direct Labor

0 H Rate X Base 4. Labor Overhead

Labor Overhead 120% 506 607


5. Special Tes ting

6. Special Equipment


8. Consultants

9. Other Direct Costs Total Consultants

10. Total Direct Costs and Overhead


12. Royal ties

13.

14. Fee b.

C634T6-5/119

Sub Total


6-9

Estimated Cost

$ 506

$ 607

$ i50

$1,263

$ 189

$1,452

$1,.583

100068

·a. -

/ I

r!Q!!: BASE MAP FROM USOS, HUNTINGTON QUAD, 1171

I

'\

i ··-..... -~

SITE LOCATION MAP TRONIC PLATING COMPANY

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS CONSUL TINO ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS

WAYNE, NEW JERSEY

DR. IY: CIG SCALE: 1 IN.• 2000 FT PROJ. NO.: 82C4548·14

CK'D. IY: AJS DATE:. 31AUGUST1983 FIG. NO.: I

J

, ~ rJ . 8f-- . +k .

~~L.:-~~~.----:-:-~----:71i~--~--------~~--~---+~-o __ ~ ___ · ____________ -.-__ ~ ...w-t · .'. 17~ \ ~. tllJ-

~ ;[ ~(

'----- GRASS AREA : \

LEGEND

\

\

~ PROPOSED MONITORING WELL

NOTE:

DRAWING ADAPTED FROM BENSIN

AND BURNS, 1974

'\..... PAVED PARKING \

MW-3r:i

~MW-2

CEtO RAL AVENUE

LbCATION PLAN fOR PROPOSED PHASE II INVESTIGATION

TRONIC PLATING COMPANY

WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS, INC.

Ill ::> z Ill > < Ill (,) a: "' :E :E 0 (,)

CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS ANO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS NEW YORK, NEW YORK

OR. BY: ORS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE PROJ. NO.:

CK'O. BY: A.JS DATE: 26 AUGUST 1983 FIG. NO.: 2

• ·.

Woodward-Clyde ConsuUarii:s, Inc .

APPENDIX A

REFERENCES


Bensin and Burns Consulting Engineers, 1974, Tronic Plating Co., Inc., Waste Treatment System, Engineering Report, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

Donaldson, C.D. 1 and Koszalka, E.J., 1983, Water Table on Long Island, New -York, March 1979, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (82-163 Syossett, New York, (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Donnelly Marketing, 1982, American Profile Information Retrieval System, based on 1980 Census Data, Stamford, Connecticut, (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Franke, O.L. and McClymonds, N.E., 1972, Summary of the Hydrologic Situation on Long Island, New York, as a Guide to Water-Management Alternatives, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 627-F, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCC Files}.

Jensen, H.M. and Soren, 1974, Hydrogeology of Suffolk County, Long Island New York, U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-50 I, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Kimmel, G.E. and Braids, O.C., 1980, Leachate Plumes in (;round Water From Babylon and Islip Landfills, Long Island, New York, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1085, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCC Files).

NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets, 1983, Agricultural Districts Map, Division of Rural Affairs, (LOCATION: NYSDA&M/ Albany Files).

NYSDEC I 975a, Tidal Wetlands Maps of Suffolk County, Division of Fish and Wildlife, (LOCATION: NYSDEC/Region I Files).

NYSDEC I 975b, Freshwater Wetlands Maps of Suffolk County, Central Islip Quad., Division of Fish and Wildlife, (LOCATION: NYSDEC/Albany Files)

NYSDEC, 1980a, Order on Consent Issued to Tronic Plating Co. for Violation of Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Low of the State of N. Y ., File No. 1-0607, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

NYSDEC 1980B, SPDES Discharge Permit to Tronic Plating Co, NY-0075574, April I, 1980 to April I, 1985.

NYSDEC 1983, Listing and Maps of Significant Habitats in Suffolk County, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Significant Habitats Unit, (LOCATION: NYSDEC Files/ Albany).

NYSDEC I 983a, Well Permits, (LOCATION: NYSDEC Files/ Albany).

NYS Parks and Recreation, I 983, Files of Suffolk County Historical Sites listed on State and Federal Registers, Division of Historic Preservation, (LOCATION: NYSP&R/ Albany Files).

C634.A/119 A-1 100073


Rand McNally, 1980, Rand McNally Road Atlas, (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Sox, N.I. 197.9, Dongerrous Properties of lndustrail Materials, Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York (LOCATION: WCC Files).

SCDHS, 1968, Letter to Tronic Plating for District Engineer, Paul A. Wingler doted July 5, 1968, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

SCDHS, 1979-1982, Notifications of Unsatisfactory Industrial Waste Sampling to Tronic Plating Co. on July 13, 1983, July 6, 1981, December 3, 1980, October I, 1980, August 5, 1980, May 21, 1980, January 3, 1980,. November 14, 1982, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

SCDHS, Analysis reprot of sample collected from "Storm drain northeast of rear door of Tronic" on August 25, 1982, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

SCDHS, Inspection Report of Tronic Plating Co., August 2, 1982 and January 24, 1983, (LOCATION: SCDHS Files).

SCDHS, 1983, SCDHS Files, (LOCATION: Hauppoque, N.Y .)

Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Deportment of Agriculture, 1975, Soil Survey of Suffolk County, New York, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Taney, N.E., 1961, Geomorphology of the South Shore of Long Island, New York, Technical Memorandum No. 128, Beach Erosion Boord, Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., (LOCATION: WCC Files).

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1983, Notional Wildlife Refuges, A Vistor's Guide, (LOCATION: wee Files).

U.S.G.S. 1979a, Amityville, N.Y. 7.5 minute Quadrangle (LOCATION: WCC Files).

U.S.G.S. 1979b, Huntington, N.Y. 7.5 minute Quadrangle, (LOCATION: WCC Files).

Woodward-Clyde Consultants 1983, Site Survey of Tronic Plating, conducted by H. Gold on April 22, 1983, (LOCATION: WCC Files).

C634.A/l I 9 A-2

·e


APPENDIX B

PERTINENT INFORMATION

SECTION

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTViENT ciF F.NVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION STATE POLLUfANT DISCHARGE L'LIMINATION SYSTEM (SPDES)

DISCBARGE PERMIT

GENERAL CONDITIONS (PART II)

PAGE

l. General Prov is ions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. Prohibitions ...................................... · ................... 1-2

3. E..-:clusions ................................... · ...........•............. 2

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

lL

12.

1/79

}Jodification, Suspensior:, Revocation ................•................. 2-3

Re1uort ing Noncompliance.; ... ·-· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 .. :;.

Insp:=ct ions .............. .i~ •••••••••..•••••••••••••••••.•••••..••••.•• 4-5

Tri311sfer of o .. ;nership .... : ... -· ...................................... ~ 5

rermi t :Renewal ........... .-~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Special Provisions - Kew or l·roified Disp::isal Systems ................. 5

l".onitoring, Recording end Rei::orting ................................... 6-8

10.1

10.2

10.3

10 .4

10.5

10.6

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Vonitoring Locations ........................................... 6

Recording of Monitoring Activities and Results ..............•.• 7

,.t.nalytical Eethods ..........................•.................. 7-8

P..pplication for Alternate Test Froced.ures ....•................. 8

Confidential Inforrra.tion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

J:!isI,:osal System O~eration and Quality Control. ....................... . 9-10

9-10

9-10

11.1 General ....................................................... .

11.2 Prohibition of Bypass ......................................... .

11.3 Special Condition-Disp.Jsal Systems with Septic Tanks ........... 10

11.4 :Cisr:csal of Collected Solids .................................•. 10

Conditions Ar:·plicable to a Publicly 0....'Tled Treatment Works (PO'JW) 1-tl!d. Users ~f a P01i'7. . . . . . • • . . . • . • • • . . • • • • . • • • . • . • • • • . • • . . • • . • . • . • . • • 11-12

12.1

12.2

Ger. eral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Fational Prctre::atrr.ent Standards: Prohibited Disch3.rges •......• 11-12

T :- ,,.,. ... --. ..

~~

},PR 4 1~·::;0

........

r· -r I

. ( •·

. : ·: ~~ ...........

;,·:-·_

:.~

'.' "":

PART.II GENERAL CONDITIONS t ...• ~ 1~ GENERAL PROVISIONS

I

a. A determination has been made on the basis of a submitted application, · lans, or ot~er available information, tha~ compliance with the specified permit

~revisions will reasonably assure compliance with applicable water quality standards. Satisfact~on of permit provisions notwithstanding, if operation

·pursuant to the permit causes or contributes to a condition in contravention of State water quality standards, or if the Department determines, on the basis of notice provided by the permittee and any related investigation, inspection or sampling, that a modification of the permit is necessary to assure maintenance of water quality standards or compliance with other provisions of ECL Article 17, or the Act, the Department may require such a modification and may require aba~em~nt action to be taken by the permit~ee and may also prohibit the -no~iced act until the permit has been modified.

b. Ail discharges aut~~~zed by this permit shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of t~is permit; facility expansions, production increases, or process modificatiofrS which result in new or increased discharges of pollutants must be-reported by submission of a new SPDES application or, if such new or increased discharge does not violate the effluent limitations specified i.n this permit, b·y submission to the permit is.suing authority of notice of such new or increased discharges of pollutants (in which case the permit may be modified to specify effluent limitations for any pollutants not identified and limited herein); the discharge of any pollutant not identified and authorized or the discharge of any pollutant more frequently than or at a level in excess of that identified and authorized by this permit shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit.

c. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any 'provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision td other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.

d. If .the discharge(s) permitted herein originate within the jurisdiction of an interstate water pollution control agency, then the permitted discharge(s) must also comply with any applicable effluent standards or water quality standards pro~ulgated by that interstate agency.

2. PRO!HBITIONS

a. Tl1e follc~ing discharge~ in~o the waters of the State are hereby prohibit~d:

(1) The discharge of any radiological, chemical or biological warfare agent or high-level radio~ctive waste, such as terms are defined by the Act or pursuant thereto; '--- .. .. ,.

'. l r_.:l 4 l_::_ 30 -~~· ("\. • ·" .....

·-·. ':

l - .• ;

\00017A

.. . . .. -:~-

f. ~ r t t. t ' f

f t

t

I I. f I

1

f f l·

l

l ~ ' '

. ::.:;•

r· t ' f

(

(2)

·--Any discharge which the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers finds would substantially linpair anchorage and navigation;

(3) Any discharge to which the Regional Administrator has objected in writing pursuant to any right to object

(4)

. provided the Administrator in Section 402(d) of the Act; and

Any discharge from a point source ~hich is in conflict with a plan or amendment thereto approved pursuant to section 208(b) of the Act, or any other discharge not permitted by this article, article 17 of the ECL, other rules and regulations adopted or applicable pursuant thereto, the Act, or the provisions of a SPDES permit.

3. EXCLUSIONS

a. The issuance of thi~permit by the Departmenl ~nd the receipt thereof by the Applicant does not supersede, revoke or rescind an order or modification thereof on consent or determination by the commissioner issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or modification

.reof.

b. The issuance of this permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor ~ny infringement of Federa~, State or local laws or regulations; nor does it obviate the necessity of obtaining other assent required by law for the discharge authorized.

c. This pe1'mi t does not autr.orize or offshore i;:hysice.l structures or facilities navigable ~aters.

e.pprove tJ-1e construction of any onsf-Dre or or the undertaking of any work in any

d. 1:otr ing in this per-mi t sh3.ll be deen1ed to preclude the institution of any legal action nor relieve tJ-.e pe>rmittee from ill'V resronsibili ties, liabilities, or penal ties to whicl1 the permi ttee is or may be subjE.~ i: under Section 311 of the Clean Water .Act, as amended.

(-;~---_,. •.-...;'•- - .. _ ... -a. If the i:,enr:ittee fails or refuses to comply with an interim or> final -~-e~i:;_{~

rr.-ent in a SPGFS permit, such noncompliance srall constitute a violation of the·.'~ l\ :pcrmi t fer which tJ-1e C'rn;r;;issior.er rray rncx:Efy, suspend, or revok~ the p~mi t. or. ·. : ~ f: t,,gke r'.Jir·ect r:nforC:C·J!lent .3.Ction pursu211t to lc.W. \tlhen, at any time nurfng or p:cior" • period~for corr:_pli-=:nce, tre f""'rmittee announces or_otJ-,erwise 1c=':t's'.J.t~]280 J<d)wn, o:· L1-E' C'cilnnss1oner on reasonable cc.use determines, tr.at tr•e permittee

i . . :' _;'-; :· :~ .-..

.... · .... ,

--·

'-.

.. ; .

-.

·.!~ ~-- :·.

L I ! f [ r ! ' I t ~

l t •. <-r

f

I. i ~

r ~ r.

I t (. r 1· . .-

1 f

'· t f ~-

f

-3-

will not make the requisite efforts to achieve compliance with an interim >r final requirement, the Corr.missioner may modify, suspend or revoke the permit and ,a~irect enforcement action pursuant to law, without vaiting for expiration of tr ~riod for compliance with sue~ requ}rements.

J. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, suspended, or revoked in ;.rhole or in part during its term for cause including, but not limited -4:,0

1 the following: . .-

1. Violation of any terms or conditions of this permit; or;

2. Obtaining this permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts, or false or inaccurate statements or iri_formation in the application; or;

3. A change in ar1y physical circumstances, requirements or criteria applicable to discharges that requires either a temporary or per~anent reduction or elimination of the authorized discharges, such as:

(i) staI'-dards for c~pstruction or operation of the discharging facility,

(ii) the characteristics of the waters into which such discharge is made,

(iii) tl:e ;.rater quality standards applicable to such waters,

(iv) the classification of such water~, or

(v) e.ffluent limitations or other requirements applicable pursuant to the Act or State law.

c. Notwithstanding (b) above, if a toxic effluent standard or prohibition (including any scheduJe of corr.pliance specified in Section 17-0813 of the EnvironI11ental Conservation law or Section 307(a) of tP-e Act) is established for a toxic pollutant which is present in the discharge authorized herein and such standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation upon such pollutant in this permit, or if this permit contains no limitations on such rollutants, this peroit shall be revised or modified in accordance ~ith the toxic effluent stancards or prohibition and the permittee shall be so notified •

. This J:-8rrait shall be ~edified, or alternatively, revoked and reissued, to comply with any e.pplicable effl1Jent stands.rd or limitation issued or approved under sections 301 (b) (2) (C) and (D), J04(b) (2) and 307(a) (2) of the Clean v:'ater Act, if the effluent standard or ]imitation so issued or aprroved:

(1) Co11tains different conditions or is otherwise more strin~ent than any effluent limitations in the permit; or

(2) Controls any pollutant not limited in the permit.

The permit as rr.odified or reissued under this paragraph shall also contain any other requirei:ents of the Act then applicable. . --~

5. RE_fOFTJJ;G .1~C·l·!CGHPLil;.l:!CE

·'

a. If for any reason the perr;-1i ttee does not cocply vi th or will be 1.i.~ble to cor.-ply with &dai}y IT-RXiiDUID effluent }iI:litation specified in this permit or shou;I_d ,S.D_Y.: ~r:11,sual cir -aordir:&ry clischA.rge of \:nstes occur for the permitted facilities, 'the perrr.i ttee shall

:l.T"'·:ediutcly noU fy the I'ef-'lrl!:.~ent of Fnvirom;:ental Conservation Region,al Office ~y te1ephon end provide the follc.....-ing infor;:;ation in vritir.g vi thin five days of S1:J.cl: 1notifi~a.,tion: \.> .. ,\_' !.'. . ·_'-, I_. _, ~

I -· --~·1-.00·079· ... ..: .;,.-:-"";..

I

b.

c.

d.

(1) Cause of noncompliance;

(2) A description of the noncomplying discharge including its impact upon the receiving waters;

(3) Anticipated time the condition of noncompliance is expected to continue, or if such condition h3.s been corrected, the duration of the period of noncompliance;

(4) Steps taken by the pennittee to reduce and eliminate the noncomplying discharge; and

' (5) Steps to be taken by the permittee to prevent recurrence of the condition of noncompliance.

Permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse impact to navigable ~aters resulting from noncompliance with any effluent limitation specified in this permit, including such accelerated or additional monitoring as rray be necessary to determine the nature and impact of the non-complying discharge.

Except as provided ·herein urXler_;Prohibition of~ss of Treatment Works, nothing in this permit sffi.11 be construed.-ito rel.Teve the permTitee from clVll or criminal penalties for noncompliance.

It is recognized tfB.t equip-nentrrnalfunction, acts of God or other circumstances c.eyond the control of the Permittee may sometimes result in effluent concentrations exceeding the permit limitations despite the exercise of appropriate care and rra.intena.nce measures and corrective measures by the Permittee. The Permittee rnay come forward to derrcnstrate to the Departrr1ent tra.t such circu;r:stances exist in any case where effluent concentrations exceed those set forth in this permit. The Department, t.cwever, is not bound to wait for or solicit such demonstrations prior to the initiation of any enforcerr,ent ·proceeding; nor must it accept as valid on its face the statements rrade in any such demonstration. t~evertheless, if the Department seeks to enforce in an ac1~inistrative or judicial proceeding any provision of any permit issued to the Permittee by any permitting c.gency, the Permittee way raise at that time the issue of whether under the Constitution, statute, or decisional law it is entitled. to a defense trat its conduct was caused by circumstances beyond its contrDl.

INSPECTIONS

a. The permittee shall allow the Commissioner of the :cepartment of Environmental Conse:1~vation, the Re8ional "~_c.JTiinistrator, end/or their a.uthorized repr·esentative, uron the presentation of credentials:

1. To Pnter up::>n the permittee's premises where an effluent source is located or in which c:my recor<ls are required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit;

2. To rcve access to and copy, at reasonable ti.mes, any records required to be }:ept under the terms and conditions of this -··-~-A-----~~=;;--pcrmi t; --~-~--~· ~--~·-:_ . __ . . . ..

... - .. . . ;~:

3. To inspect any rnonitor:ing equirment or practices being paintaJped pur·sue:.nt to this :permit; or ~f:,tK 4 j_::D

.. ; ..

._. -:~a""';'"~ •-·· • •" • - ' :. ~

--4. To have access to and· sample any discharge of pollutants to waters of the State or to publicly owned treatment works resulting directly or indirectly from activities or operations of the owner or operator of the premises in which the effluent source or outlet is located.

--TRP.NSFER OF 0\·INERSHIP

a. P.ny permi ttee who intends to transfer a SP DES permit is required to r.otify the the Department in advance of the transfer. In the case of a change of ownership only, notice to the Department is required prior to change; in the case of an ownership change accompanied by a change or proposed change in wastev:ater characteristics, a minimum of 180 days prior notice to the Department is required.

b. The terms and conditions of this permit are binding on the successors or assigns in interest of the original permittee.

8. PERMIT RENEWAL

a.

b.

--

Any permittee who wishes to continue to discharge after the expiration date of a permit shall apply for 'renewal of its permit no later than 180 days prior to the permit's expiration date (unless permission for a later date has been granted by the Departrr.ent) by submitting any forms, fees, or supplemental information which may be required by the Department. Upon request, the Department sha 11 provide the permit tee with specific i nfomation concerning the forms, fees, and supplemental inforil.ation required.

When a pennittee has made timely and sufficient application for the renewal of a pennit or a new permit with reference to any activity of a continuing nature, the existing permit does not expire until the application has been finally detennined by the Department, and, in case the appli-cation is denied or the terms of the new permit limited, until the last day for seeking review of the Department order or a later date fixed by order of the reviewing court, provided that this subdivision shall not affect any valid Department action then in effect surmiarily suspending such permit.

9. SPECIAL PROVISIONS - NEW OR MODIFIED DISPOSAL SYSTEMS

a.

b.

c.

Prior to construction of any new waste· disposal system or modification which would materially alter the volume of, or the method or effect of treating or disposing of the sewage, industrial waste or other wastes. from an existing waste disposal system, the Permittee shall submit to the Department or its designated field office for review, an approvable engineering report, plans, and specifications which have been prepared by a person or firm licensed to practice Professional Engineering in the State of New York.

The construction of the above new or modified disposal system sh~ll not start until the Permittee receives written approval from the Department or its designated field office.

The construction of the above new or rr;odified disposal..system shall be under the general supervision of a person or firm 1 icens~d-~t;g P-l'.'~cti_ce .. -·: --"" Professional Engineerins in i!ew York State, and upon co0pletfo_l} of.· ·: · · construction that person or fi rn1 shall certify to the DepartmenJ_ or· its · designated field office that the system has been fully c6replet~· in accordance with the approved engineering report, pl ans and speci fi catioq?_~~ pe,.i.-mir}ind letter of approval. ·· -

- . ' .. · .. \ .. '.

--~ .....

...

: '.

.---- 6 -

d. The Department and its designated field offices review wastewater disrosal system re:p::>rts, ·pJ.ans, and specifications for treatment process capability only, and approval by either office does not constitute approval of the system's structural integrity.

lO. MONITORING RECORDING P..ND REPORTING

10.1 General

a. The permittee shall comply with all recording, rerorting, rocmitoring and sampling requirements herein and such other additional terms, provisions, requirements or conditions that the Department rray deem to be rea~onably necessary to achieve the purroses of the Environmental Conservation Law, ~.rticle 17, the Act, or rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto.

~~ ::.; b. Sair1ples and mea.s1-ll'ip..Jr.ents taken to meet the nxmi toring requirements specified herein srall be representati've of the volume and nature of the n-onitored discr.a.rge. -comrosite samples should be 11 flow-prorortioned 11

if necessary to obtain· a representative sample.

c. The permittee shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instru.-rr,entation to insure accuracy of rr:easure..TT,ents.

10. 2 Voni taring Locations

a. Perrnittee shall taK:e samples and measurements to meet the monitoring requirewents at the locations specified.

b. Unless specified otherwise, sainples of the effluent shall be taken at the roint of combined flow into the outfall sewer.

c. lTnless specified otherwise, sa.~ples of the influent wastewater shall be taken at the roint of plant inflow.

4 EJO

•.· .;· -:,,

.· ···,

ll . •

:-: .... ,. '

-7-·

10.3 Recording of Monitoring Activities and Results

a. The permittce mation resulting from permit.

shall make and maintain records of all inforthe monitoring activities required by this

' b. The permittee shall record f~r each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this permit the following information: (1) The date, exact place, and time of sampling; (2) The dates analyses were performed; (3) Who performed the analyses; (4) The analytical techniques or methods used; and, (5) The results of all required analyses.

c. If the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than is required by this per!flit, he shall include the results of such monitoring in the calculatron~and reporting of the values required in the Discharge Monitoring Reptrt form. Such increased frequency shall be indicated on the Discharge Mpnitoring Report form.

·r d. The perrnittee shall retain for a minimum of three (3) years

all records of monitoring activities and results including all records of calibration and maintenance of instrumentation and original strip chart recordings from continuous monitoring instrumentation. This period of retention shall be extended during the course of any unresolved litigation or other proceedings regarding the discharge of pollutants by the permittee or when requested by the Commissioner of

\. the Department of Environmental Conservation or the EPA Regional Administrator.

10.4 Analytical Methods

Following promulgation of guidelines establishing~-;t~'.~ft'. :p~-j~t~dSure$ for the analysis of pollutants, published pursuant -·Eo·· s ect·ion·.:- ~foLI'(g) ~· of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, all sampling and analytical methods used to meet the monitoring requirements specified above shall conform to such guidelines. If the Section 304(s guidelines do not specify test procedures for any pollutants required to be monitored by this permit and until such guidelines are promulgated, sampling and analytical methods used to meet the monitoring requirements specified in this permit shall, unless otherwise specifiec by the Commissioner, conform to the latest edition of the following references:

1. Standard .Methods for the Examination of ~'lter and Wastel'!_aters, 14th Edition, 1976, American Public Health Association, New York, New York 10019.

2. A. S. T. M. St~ndards, Part j1, Wate~; Atmospheric l\na-lysD:;;-i-9~7~A;-e-~ican Society for Testing and l'1.ab::rin.l

.,

i

t i I

~ " ' ! ! l

.:-":.

~· ~

t r ! f ~.. ~ f-• r. ~ i t f

Philacl1;lph1.a., p,-;nnsylvania 19103. 1~n.99~ \%V' a

I -8-

3. Metl~od~J_or Chemical l\nalys is of Water and Wastes, ~arch, 1979, Environmental Protection Agency Water Quality Office, Analy~ical, Quality Control Laboratory, NECR, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.

10.5 Application for Alternate Test Procedures

a. The applicant shall submit ~is application to the Director of the Bureau of Monitoring and Surveillance, Division of Pure Waters, N.Y.D.E.c., 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233.

b. Unless application triplicate.

and until printed application forms are made ava_ilable, an for an alternate test procedure may be made by letter.in

Any application for an alternate test procedure shall: ,_ -. -(1) Provide the name ~!d address of the responsible person or

firm making the discharge (if not the applicant) and the applicable ID number of the existing or pending permit, issuing agency, and type of permit for which the alternate test procedure is requested, and the discharge serial number.

(2) Identify the pollutant or parameter for which approval of an --alternate testing procedure is being requested.

(3) Provide justification for using testing procedures other than those specified in Table I? FEDERAL REGISTER, 52781, Vol. 41, No. 232, ~ed., Dec. 1, 1976, or as amended.

(4) Provide a detailed description of the proposed alternate test procedure, together with references to published studies of the applicability of the alternate test procedure to the effluents in question.

a. Except_for data determined to be confidential under Section 17-0805 of the Enviro~rnental Conservation Law or Section 308 of the Act, all such reports shall be available for public inspection at the offices of the Department of Environmental Conservation and the Regional Administrator of EPA Region II. Knowingly making any false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided for in Section 71-1933 of the Environ.mental Cons.ervation - ; ....... Law or Section 309 of the Act. --- ,_-:"\

: >

: .. (:. :··. ) i ~·~

~->~·- · _ ~; i ·. _ -, <-· ~-s ,---.. "·:---~--~- -: -l00-0·8~

' ,.

r f..

I t ~ l

l t

t ~

t

.. ·

r [. I

r-L. f. f t [ t l r. I. l l i

f t r i-i r.. ' t f !- ·. f I i

~ I 1 r I

t . t

- 9 -

11. DISPOSAL SYSTEM OPERATION AND QUALI1Y C01\"I'R_Q_1.

11.l General ~

a. The dis:i=osal syste.m sh3.ll not receive or be corrrrnitted to receive wastes beyond its design capacity as to volume and ch3.racter of wastes treated, nor shall the system be materially altered as to: type, degree, or capa.city of tr·eatment provided; dis:i=osal of treated effluent; or treatment and dis:i=osal of separated scum, liquids, solids or combinations thereof resulting from the treatment process without prior written approval of the Department of Fnvironmental Conservation or its designated field office.

b. The permittee sh3.ll at all times maintain in gcx:xi working order and operate as efficiently as reasonably possible any dis]:)Osal system or systems installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.

c. Any rraintenance of. t~e disposal system trat rray cause a degradation of effluent quality sr.aJi be scheduled during non-critical ~ater quality pericxis and shall be carried out in a rria.nner approved by the New York State Department of L1vir-onrf.ental Conservation.

d. When required under Title 6 of tt.e Official Compilation of (',odes·, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York (61'i'YCRF650), sufficient personnel meeting qualifications for operators of sewage treatment works as required thErein shall be err;ployed to satisfactorily operate e.nd maintain the treatment works.

e. 'D".e permittee shall not discharge floating solids or visible foam, unless specifically authorized by this permit.

11.2 Prohibition of Eyp~ss of TreatT~nt ~orks

a. Bypass or diversion of wastes from any portion of the treatment facilities is prohibited except:

(1) Where unavoidable to prevent loss of life, serious injury or severe property Clarrage. Severe property darrage includes substantial pl·iysical narra.ge to property; daJ?age to the treat1J1ent facilities which would cause tr.em to become inoperable; or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonablsr be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. It does not include economic loss caused by delays in production; and

(2) vJ-,ere triere are no feasible alternatives to bypass, such as the use of auxjliary trcatrr.ent facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or JT'aintenance during nonral periods of equipment downtime; and

..... \ ' J

10DD.85 . . - ... ~- .

(

ll.3

11.4

- l·C -

(3) vlhere the permittee promptly but in no event later t~ 24 hours after the permittee learns of the bypass, submits notice of the bypass or an anticipated need for bypass to the Department containing the inforrration requir~ by Section S of this Part.

Where the permittee knows in advance of the need for the bypass, this notification sh:Ul be submitted for approval to the Department before the date of bypass. Bypass shaJ.l be either:

(i) Prohibited by the Dep3.rbnent in consideration of the adverse effects of the bypass and the factors set out above, or

(ii) Allowed under conditions determined to be necessary by the Department to minimize any adverse effects.

s-pecial Condition - DiSfOSal SystB~S with Septic Tanks

If a septic tank is.:.instaJled as part of Hie disposal system, it shaJl be inspected by U1e :pE;,.~ittee or his agent for scum and s1udge accumu1ation at intervals not to exceed one year's duration, and such accumulation will be removed before the depth of either exceeds one-fourth (~) of the liquid depth so that no set"tleable solids or scum will leave in the septic tank effluent. Such accwT.ulation srall be disposed of in an ap~r0ved rr6Jlner.

Sludge Disp:?sal

a. The storage or disposal of collected screenings, sludges, other solids, or precipitates separated from the permitted discrarges and/or intake or supply water by the permittee shall be done in such a rra..nner as to prevent creation of nuisance conditions or entry of such-rrater·ials into classified waters or their tributaries, and in a rra.nner approved by the Department. P..:ny live fish, shellfish, or ot1ier anirrals collected or trapped as a result of intake water screening or treatment rray be returned to their y;ater bc<ly habitat. The permittee shall IJB.intain reC'Ords of disposal on all effluent screenings, sludges 211d other solids associated with the discha.J.~ge(s) herein described. The following data shall be compiled and reported to the Department or its designated field office upon request:

1. The sources of the rrBterials to be disposed of;

2. The appl"'Oxirrate volumes and weights;

3. The rr.ethod by which they were rcL"cved and transported;

4. Their final disposal locations.

... ·- -:..

t' -·'"I 'l ....... . ! .••••

. i :: .rs.

.. ·- ...... \ :. : J

! I l

!

12. -. -,;.2.1

·e

·9

CONDI_:!'l.._0_!'.i~PLICABJ,E TO A PUBLICLY OW~ED TREATMENT WORKS (POTW) A...l-.l"D USERS OF A POTH

GENERAL

a. Notice shall be given the Department of Environmental Conservation of any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW from a source which would be a new source as defined in Section J06 of the Act if such source was discharging pollutants; and, except as to such categories and classes of sources specified by tbe Commissioner, any new 'introduction of pollutants which exceed 10,000 gallons on any one day into the POTW from a source which would be subject to Section 301 of the Act if such source was discharging pollutants; and any substantial change in volume or character of pollutants being introduced into the POTW at the time of issuance of the permit. Such notice shall include information on the quality and quantity of effluent to be introduced into the POTW; and an anticipated impact of such change in the quantity or quali'ty of effluent to be discharged from the POTW. •, · . ..;.

~ .)

b. The permittee shall require any industrial user of the POTW to comply with the require~ents of Section 204(b), 307, and 308 of the Act. Any industrial user subject to the requirements of Section 307 of the Act shall be required by the pennittee to prepare and transmit to the New York State DepartUJent of Envirorn;:iental Conservation periodic notice (over intervals not to exceed 9 months) of progress toward full compliance with Section 307 requirements. The permittee, upon receipt of such reports shall transmit a copy prm:iptly to the Department. ·

c. For discharges from publicly owned treatment works, appropriate measures will be established by the pennittee to insure compli9"nce by industrial users with any system of user charges and recovery of construction costs required under the provisions of the Act.

d. Persons discharging industrial waste to a publicly owned treatment works shall comply with toxic effluent standards and pretreatment standards and with moni.toring, reporting, recording, sampling and entry requirements provided by the Act or the Environmental Conservation Law, Article 17 or adopted pursuant to the Act or the EnviroTh~ental Conservation Law, Article 17.

(Note: The following Section was published in the Federal _i::_e~_!_er, Vol. 43, No. 123 - Honday June 26, 1978. The effective date of the regulation (Part 403) was August 25, 1978)·

§403.5 National Pretreatment Standards: Prohibited Disch~rges.

(a) Pollutants.introduced into POTW's by any source of a nondomestic djscharge shall not inhibit or Interfere with the operation O_:!.· perfonnance of the works. These general prohibitions apply to all such use_.rs <Jif f~POTW whether or not the user is subject to other Nati.anal Pref'rc~tnrent:-0 St,tnchrds or <lny National, State, or local Pretreatment Requi_rcmcpts:

... _, .

·: .. · ..

..... :.'J. •.

.i-·

·.,;. .. . ....

t· -~ .

. _.-:··

[ r l .. • '."' f

·. :{()0,08? \ i

I

(b) The following pollutant; may not be introduced into a POTW:

(1) Pollutants which c~ate a fire or explosion hazard in the POTW;

(2) Pollutants which will cause co~rosive structural damage to the POTW, but in no case discharges with pH lower than 5.0 unless the works is specifically designed to accorm:nodate such discharges;

(3) Solid or viscous p,ollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in sewers, or other Interference with the operation of the POTW;

(4) Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) released in a discharge of such volume or strength as to cause Interference in the POTW.

(5) Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in Interfere~c~:but in no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at the treaclnent works influent exceeds 40°C(l04°F) unless the works is designed to acc··orurao9ate such heat.

(c) POTW's developing POTW Pretreatment Programs pursuant to ~403.8 shall be required to develo~ and enforce specific_ limits for discharges of the pollutants listed in g403.5(b) (1)-(5). In addition, any POTW in violation~ of an RPDES Permit requirement as a result of Interference by a polJutant listed in §403.S(b)(l)-(5) shall be required by the EPA or NPDES state to develop and enforce such specific limits.

(d) Where specific prohibitions or limits on the pollutants or pollutant parameters listed in §403.5(b)(l)-(5) are developed by a POTW, either as a requirement of an Approved POTW Pretreatment Program pursuant to §403.8 or an NPDES Permit, such limits shall be incorporated in the NPDES Permit issued to the POTW and shall replace and be enforceable in lieu of the general prohibitions set forth in this section.

(e) Compliance with the provisions of this section is required beginning on the effective date of this regulation, except for paragraph (b)(S) of this section which must be complied with within 3 years of the effective date of this regulation.

?:"-;:: ,,,. ~- ..

.-

I t -t

4 E~C i (' .-. . -. I (· ooos~rr

. ~· '-· .. . !

. ,. . -1;_ .-

--Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc.

APPENDIX C

UPDATED NEW YORK ST A TE REGISTRY FORM

•••

Code=-~---~-~~~ Site Code: 15d-Oef-g··

Region : __ -=l ___ _ Name of Site: Tronic Pl a ting Co., Inc. County: Suffolk Street Address 168 Central Ave.

To-wn/CHy Earmjngdal e

· Status of Site Narrativ~:

"Tronic Plating Co.is an active electroplating facility which has been in operation at least since 1968. Heavy metals were detected in the leaching pools and in a stDr.m drain on site. The facility was ordered to clean out the leaching pools and construct an adequate be-m in the building to contain possible spills.

Access to the site was denied so this report is based on available information There is no record of compliant with the above mentioned order on consent.

Type.. of Site: Open Dump Landfill

D CJ

Treatment Pond(s) 0 Lagoon (s) l1J

Number of Ponds ___ _ Number of Lagoons_........;4_

Structure l!J

:E.sti.!nated Size 0.5 Acres

Hazardous Wastes Disposed? Confirmed []]

*Type and Quant~ty of Hazardous Was~es:

Cooper, silver, zinc. iron, lead.

cadium, cyanide

* Use additional sheets if more space is needed.

C-1

Suspected 0

QUANTITY (Pounds, C.rums, tons, gallons)

total greater than 19 x 106

gallons including contaminated water & soil

.l Name. of Current ewner.of Site: Stockholders (Jerrold Roth, Pres.)

Address of Current Owner of Site: .168 Central Ave. Farmingdale, NY 11735

Time Period Site Was Used for Hazardous Waste Disposal:

July 19 68 To Present 19

Is s:ite Active I:!J. · Inactive r::J (Site is inactive if hazardous wastes were disposed of at this site and site was closed pri.or to August .25, 1979)

Types of Samples: Air 0 Groundwater a. None D Surface Water I:J Soil J::]

Remedial Action: Proposed U In Progress 0

Nature of .Action:

Under Design D Completed CJ

Status of Legal Action:~~~~~~~~~~~ State 0

Permits Issued: Federal 0 Solid Waste r::J

Local Government CJ M:ined Land CJ

Assessment or Environmental Problems:

Federal 0

SPDES [3iJ Wetlands D

There exists the.possibility of ground water contamination from the

leaching pools ·(heavy metals) as well as from inadequately c.ontai.ned

spills within the building.

Assessment cf Real th. Problems:

Unknown; there exists a public water supply well field less than one

mile distant.

Persons Completing th1.s Form:

Michael Aker.l>ergs

Woodward-Clyde Consultants

August 4, 1983

Other r::J

Nev-York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

New YorK State Depa~tment of Realth

Date ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6/3f 8l. Rl'H: cl.

C-2

------.