Top Banner
Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis UCSF iGEM Team 2006 Patrick Visperas Matthew Eames Eli Groban Ala Trusina Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao Tang, Chris Rao
13

Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Jan 12, 2016

Download

Documents

alisa

Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis. UCSF iGEM Team 2006. Patrick Visperas Matthew Eames Eli Groban Ala Trusina. Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao Tang, Chris Rao. Goal. Start. Remote Control of a Bacterial Machine. How Chemotaxis is Observed. Goulian Motility Assay (U Penn). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

UCSF iGEM Team 2006

Patrick Visperas

Matthew Eames

Eli Groban

Ala Trusina

Christopher Voigt, Tanja Kortemme, Chao Tang, Chris Rao

Page 2: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Remote Control of a Bacterial MachineRemote Control of a Bacterial Machine

Go

al

Sta

rt

Page 3: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

How Bacterial Chemotaxis WorksBacteria Swim Up Gradients

concentration gradient

No gradient

CCW Glide

Tumble?CW

How Chemotaxis is Observed

Goulian Motility Assay (U Penn)

Page 4: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

The Regulatory Network

WAP~

YP~

A

Y

No CheW

No Swimming

Page 5: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Binding Partners

•Orthogonal binding pair Tsr-CheW (Liu et al, 1991)

•We mapped these mutations onto the Tar-Chew complex

Tar

CheW

Page 6: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Tsr mutation can be mapped to Tar Gradient Aspartate

• point mutation in Tar* reduces motility to approximately 40% that of wild-type

Page 7: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Part Design• New orthogonal signaling pairs

“Codon randomization” is used to reuse scaffolds without fear of recombination

Page 8: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Chassis Engineering• Build E. coli strain lacking all sensors and CheW, but retaining the other chemotaxis proteins

tar tsr tap trg aer cheW

Wild-type E. coli

tar tsr tap trg aer cheW

UU1250 (Parkinson, U Utah)

UUcheW

tar tsr tap trg aer cheW

cheW* tar*

Page 9: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Tested in UU1250

FimE

IRL IRR

IRR IRL

OUTPUT[ara]

FimE

Ptrc*rfp gfp

MCS

GREEN

RE

D

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 0.3 1.2 5[arabinose] (mM)

% b

act

eri

a

1. The plasmid is unstable

2. The strain contains FimE/ FimB

2 Possible Problems

Device Characterization: The Fim-Switch

- ara

+ ara

INPUT

T. Ham, et al (2006)

Page 10: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

- arabinose

Phe Asp

araC PBAD fimE T1x4 CheW r2 Ptrc* r2 CheW* T1 PlacIQ r0 phe-tar r0 asp-tar*

Phe

CheYCheY

Constructed via DNA synthesis (DNA 2.0)

System Design (11 kB)

Page 11: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

araC PBAD fimE T1x4 CheW r2 Ptrc* r2 CheW* T1 PlacIQ r0 phe-tar r0 asp-tar*

Asp

CheYCheY

Phe Asp

+ arabinose

Constructed via DNA synthesis (DNA 2.0)

- arabinose

Phe Asp

System Design (11 kB)

Page 12: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Results Gradient Gradient Aspartate Phenylalanine

Page 13: Remote Control of Bacterial Chemotaxis

Conclusions• Orthogonal pairs are a rapid method to built signaling pathways that can operate simultaneously

• Chassis developed to rapidly screen for new protein-protein interactions

• Limited by the switch performance in this chassis

• Directional control could also be achieved by non-chemical inputs (light, radiation, etc)