This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
PJllllDIB SKilJIIGB Ylllgt SUI US BP A JBI W ~ JIJ 68~1-7250
ASSDHIIIJ JIJ 141-1Ll4 1111S SIDllll
MDBl 17 1917
US ZPA JBaiCif I ID[QJNUJJ6JDIIOI
~ by Dao srvic Inc-middotshyIa leCI1rmlogy Inc auzt Nw Jvj
I Introcbtia1of~
II lgtqlOTdod Sit JIJtory ond lthrcngtlogy of EYw1to
III Sit OOnetOrizoticn
IV Todlnical Cllta oep Egtdtirq gtMqont tD xdiat ~ lctlcn ord lloloticn ~~tlagt
- shyv Prelillinuy -lrq of ~ TodngtlOIJIbull for hulbillty study shy
IYaluotial ond Agtl~illty of ToaroolOIJI-
IV Riak ~ IUd oaaial of ARIiclblbull or Ralvant IUd
--lAta~ VII ~Plan wd Schdlle far qcent_a)_ ~ 1nvbullti911tim
ord hulbillty study
VIII Potmtial far~ Actim
IX lllpl~cn of Uty llolotlcn Plan
x ~-len
------- NOTICE If tho fll10 Image Ia le11 clear than thla notice It Ia due to tht PINETTES SALVAGE YARD
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDof the documtnt
PIS002
middot-middot
-SOl--Bita --Bitambllty-~olshy
-uary 1970 - Ilaquobq Air raroo -middot - MECXI1tncta Avm c Brooln JR (eloctrioalCDitnctar) _on nplac tmo old tnlwf~ (1940a) trta the Ia- a1tnl -tbq - c ~ lccal oolvoqo blou-a on often trarwforn tar tr if blau-~u--
bull ~ trarwfonuw ~ trca bue~ 1979 tnNprlod -tum (llgtillod) or ~ of cJeloctric fluid s 41ntled
- MoiJw lEI cel1od by eloctrWal
-middotmiddot~ cxnarn1ng McJticnol cello - by otbon inYol-~~~gtillmiddot
) illogol ~ of dleloctric fluid
Jprill080 - - lEI agtllocta 01111 anal~ shy(2) ocil 0011gt1bull ord - Aroclor 1260 (Fal) orwita in -otntiorw of 30000 -d 58000 PPImiddot
- MoiJw lEI agtllocto odlliticnol ocil on ~tar (ourfoco wtar) _1 - (3) -1- ltDlfim tho _of Aroclar 1260 and trichl~ in ocll ~ Aroclar 1260 _ intho -of tho---shy00111bullmiddot
- ra cxnbt8 aita inlpecticra anlMay 1982 oollecta toxr u MDPlbullmiddot Analysis indioat Aroclor 1260 cxna1tntiaw ~to 29000 pprr
shy
- B nctifibull Maine tEP that ~ SalWIJI Yard bullitbull hM riwd a HRS
-lll82
Soon or 39 61 juotiryiJq ito ireluaim en thll HPL in ocrtc 1982
~1982 - MaU tiP cap -gtill arM (95 X 100) with ooil ani 10 1111 po1ywthyl tD provont infiltnticn tna ~ CDltD1nltim
ICaith 1983 - EPA _u that IUIROOO clovolop JWtP to MEW u bMU for lB ooopirq
_ lllBl - ~to -1 Action (IliA) authariMd by EPA Roqicn IliA Authoriutim mitt to Dshy~-Divioicn
- EPA ani aixa1trlcton -UiMd tDbullitbull putially datU ~ of -~y1046
taw of CD1Ia1Mtod ooil shyirq 50 liP tol)Ot vollraquo ani llhlR-1 tD- __ City NY
- trial ~ ot bullite taJowl for orrioo of-ani -u -(CDR)
July 1985 - IUIFlT - Tedlniool ~w Doat (lUI) tD initioto bull llOIoticn ~~era at the bullita
- lliiFlT Cltlrlbto rint ~irq ran~ of u afaoa wter wd plltable woll ~yz port~ by ClP or by IUIFlT in holraquoo ocr-Urq
- IUInT Cltlrlbto ai1IIW)in ani ootoblUMo oaqgtlo grid of tha oito soan ran of oaqgtlirq of ooilo gron wtarallfece wter ard patable wall wtar ~ ard ~ inshy
- -t1njo _ PA ani IUIFlT 1shy tD cxrclulo that - SOlvage
-lll85-llllylll86 -middot Yard Site t not Utable far dlllletial rraa NPL _uy c11rwto IUIFlT tD ~ cno Wtional oaoplirq ran tD ciofino - or ~icbll COItainatim an plpaae a riold octivitibull --ry npgtrt
llly1916 - IUlPll - third -llzq rtUlllof u rcantter~wa~ater
- IUlPll CD1tncta IOlrVW)IzqAult)uot 1916 --middot ~tDIOlrVW)oitoon1---middot lilY 1917 - RfM-m tooo -i--lt -iPt 148-1134 to ontJct an RIPSinYooti9otiltln ot tho oito
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
I Introcbtia1of~
II lgtqlOTdod Sit JIJtory ond lthrcngtlogy of EYw1to
III Sit OOnetOrizoticn
IV Todlnical Cllta oep Egtdtirq gtMqont tD xdiat ~ lctlcn ord lloloticn ~~tlagt
- shyv Prelillinuy -lrq of ~ TodngtlOIJIbull for hulbillty study shy
IYaluotial ond Agtl~illty of ToaroolOIJI-
IV Riak ~ IUd oaaial of ARIiclblbull or Ralvant IUd
--lAta~ VII ~Plan wd Schdlle far qcent_a)_ ~ 1nvbullti911tim
ord hulbillty study
VIII Potmtial far~ Actim
IX lllpl~cn of Uty llolotlcn Plan
x ~-len
------- NOTICE If tho fll10 Image Ia le11 clear than thla notice It Ia due to tht PINETTES SALVAGE YARD
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDof the documtnt
PIS002
middot-middot
-SOl--Bita --Bitambllty-~olshy
-uary 1970 - Ilaquobq Air raroo -middot - MECXI1tncta Avm c Brooln JR (eloctrioalCDitnctar) _on nplac tmo old tnlwf~ (1940a) trta the Ia- a1tnl -tbq - c ~ lccal oolvoqo blou-a on often trarwforn tar tr if blau-~u--
bull ~ trarwfonuw ~ trca bue~ 1979 tnNprlod -tum (llgtillod) or ~ of cJeloctric fluid s 41ntled
- MoiJw lEI cel1od by eloctrWal
-middotmiddot~ cxnarn1ng McJticnol cello - by otbon inYol-~~~gtillmiddot
) illogol ~ of dleloctric fluid
Jprill080 - - lEI agtllocta 01111 anal~ shy(2) ocil 0011gt1bull ord - Aroclor 1260 (Fal) orwita in -otntiorw of 30000 -d 58000 PPImiddot
- MoiJw lEI agtllocto odlliticnol ocil on ~tar (ourfoco wtar) _1 - (3) -1- ltDlfim tho _of Aroclar 1260 and trichl~ in ocll ~ Aroclar 1260 _ intho -of tho---shy00111bullmiddot
- ra cxnbt8 aita inlpecticra anlMay 1982 oollecta toxr u MDPlbullmiddot Analysis indioat Aroclor 1260 cxna1tntiaw ~to 29000 pprr
shy
- B nctifibull Maine tEP that ~ SalWIJI Yard bullitbull hM riwd a HRS
-lll82
Soon or 39 61 juotiryiJq ito ireluaim en thll HPL in ocrtc 1982
~1982 - MaU tiP cap -gtill arM (95 X 100) with ooil ani 10 1111 po1ywthyl tD provont infiltnticn tna ~ CDltD1nltim
ICaith 1983 - EPA _u that IUIROOO clovolop JWtP to MEW u bMU for lB ooopirq
_ lllBl - ~to -1 Action (IliA) authariMd by EPA Roqicn IliA Authoriutim mitt to Dshy~-Divioicn
- EPA ani aixa1trlcton -UiMd tDbullitbull putially datU ~ of -~y1046
taw of CD1Ia1Mtod ooil shyirq 50 liP tol)Ot vollraquo ani llhlR-1 tD- __ City NY
- trial ~ ot bullite taJowl for orrioo of-ani -u -(CDR)
July 1985 - IUIFlT - Tedlniool ~w Doat (lUI) tD initioto bull llOIoticn ~~era at the bullita
- lliiFlT Cltlrlbto rint ~irq ran~ of u afaoa wter wd plltable woll ~yz port~ by ClP or by IUIFlT in holraquoo ocr-Urq
- IUInT Cltlrlbto ai1IIW)in ani ootoblUMo oaqgtlo grid of tha oito soan ran of oaqgtlirq of ooilo gron wtarallfece wter ard patable wall wtar ~ ard ~ inshy
- -t1njo _ PA ani IUIFlT 1shy tD cxrclulo that - SOlvage
-lll85-llllylll86 -middot Yard Site t not Utable far dlllletial rraa NPL _uy c11rwto IUIFlT tD ~ cno Wtional oaoplirq ran tD ciofino - or ~icbll COItainatim an plpaae a riold octivitibull --ry npgtrt
llly1916 - IUlPll - third -llzq rtUlllof u rcantter~wa~ater
- IUlPll CD1tncta IOlrVW)IzqAult)uot 1916 --middot ~tDIOlrVW)oitoon1---middot lilY 1917 - RfM-m tooo -i--lt -iPt 148-1134 to ontJct an RIPSinYooti9otiltln ot tho oito
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
------- NOTICE If tho fll10 Image Ia le11 clear than thla notice It Ia due to tht PINETTES SALVAGE YARD
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDof the documtnt
PIS002
middot-middot
-SOl--Bita --Bitambllty-~olshy
-uary 1970 - Ilaquobq Air raroo -middot - MECXI1tncta Avm c Brooln JR (eloctrioalCDitnctar) _on nplac tmo old tnlwf~ (1940a) trta the Ia- a1tnl -tbq - c ~ lccal oolvoqo blou-a on often trarwforn tar tr if blau-~u--
bull ~ trarwfonuw ~ trca bue~ 1979 tnNprlod -tum (llgtillod) or ~ of cJeloctric fluid s 41ntled
- MoiJw lEI cel1od by eloctrWal
-middotmiddot~ cxnarn1ng McJticnol cello - by otbon inYol-~~~gtillmiddot
) illogol ~ of dleloctric fluid
Jprill080 - - lEI agtllocta 01111 anal~ shy(2) ocil 0011gt1bull ord - Aroclor 1260 (Fal) orwita in -otntiorw of 30000 -d 58000 PPImiddot
- MoiJw lEI agtllocto odlliticnol ocil on ~tar (ourfoco wtar) _1 - (3) -1- ltDlfim tho _of Aroclar 1260 and trichl~ in ocll ~ Aroclar 1260 _ intho -of tho---shy00111bullmiddot
- ra cxnbt8 aita inlpecticra anlMay 1982 oollecta toxr u MDPlbullmiddot Analysis indioat Aroclor 1260 cxna1tntiaw ~to 29000 pprr
shy
- B nctifibull Maine tEP that ~ SalWIJI Yard bullitbull hM riwd a HRS
-lll82
Soon or 39 61 juotiryiJq ito ireluaim en thll HPL in ocrtc 1982
~1982 - MaU tiP cap -gtill arM (95 X 100) with ooil ani 10 1111 po1ywthyl tD provont infiltnticn tna ~ CDltD1nltim
ICaith 1983 - EPA _u that IUIROOO clovolop JWtP to MEW u bMU for lB ooopirq
_ lllBl - ~to -1 Action (IliA) authariMd by EPA Roqicn IliA Authoriutim mitt to Dshy~-Divioicn
- EPA ani aixa1trlcton -UiMd tDbullitbull putially datU ~ of -~y1046
taw of CD1Ia1Mtod ooil shyirq 50 liP tol)Ot vollraquo ani llhlR-1 tD- __ City NY
- trial ~ ot bullite taJowl for orrioo of-ani -u -(CDR)
July 1985 - IUIFlT - Tedlniool ~w Doat (lUI) tD initioto bull llOIoticn ~~era at the bullita
- lliiFlT Cltlrlbto rint ~irq ran~ of u afaoa wter wd plltable woll ~yz port~ by ClP or by IUIFlT in holraquoo ocr-Urq
- IUInT Cltlrlbto ai1IIW)in ani ootoblUMo oaqgtlo grid of tha oito soan ran of oaqgtlirq of ooilo gron wtarallfece wter ard patable wall wtar ~ ard ~ inshy
- -t1njo _ PA ani IUIFlT 1shy tD cxrclulo that - SOlvage
-lll85-llllylll86 -middot Yard Site t not Utable far dlllletial rraa NPL _uy c11rwto IUIFlT tD ~ cno Wtional oaoplirq ran tD ciofino - or ~icbll COItainatim an plpaae a riold octivitibull --ry npgtrt
llly1916 - IUlPll - third -llzq rtUlllof u rcantter~wa~ater
- IUlPll CD1tncta IOlrVW)IzqAult)uot 1916 --middot ~tDIOlrVW)oitoon1---middot lilY 1917 - RfM-m tooo -i--lt -iPt 148-1134 to ontJct an RIPSinYooti9otiltln ot tho oito
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
-SOl--Bita --Bitambllty-~olshy
-uary 1970 - Ilaquobq Air raroo -middot - MECXI1tncta Avm c Brooln JR (eloctrioalCDitnctar) _on nplac tmo old tnlwf~ (1940a) trta the Ia- a1tnl -tbq - c ~ lccal oolvoqo blou-a on often trarwforn tar tr if blau-~u--
bull ~ trarwfonuw ~ trca bue~ 1979 tnNprlod -tum (llgtillod) or ~ of cJeloctric fluid s 41ntled
- MoiJw lEI cel1od by eloctrWal
-middotmiddot~ cxnarn1ng McJticnol cello - by otbon inYol-~~~gtillmiddot
) illogol ~ of dleloctric fluid
Jprill080 - - lEI agtllocta 01111 anal~ shy(2) ocil 0011gt1bull ord - Aroclor 1260 (Fal) orwita in -otntiorw of 30000 -d 58000 PPImiddot
- MoiJw lEI agtllocto odlliticnol ocil on ~tar (ourfoco wtar) _1 - (3) -1- ltDlfim tho _of Aroclar 1260 and trichl~ in ocll ~ Aroclar 1260 _ intho -of tho---shy00111bullmiddot
- ra cxnbt8 aita inlpecticra anlMay 1982 oollecta toxr u MDPlbullmiddot Analysis indioat Aroclor 1260 cxna1tntiaw ~to 29000 pprr
shy
- B nctifibull Maine tEP that ~ SalWIJI Yard bullitbull hM riwd a HRS
-lll82
Soon or 39 61 juotiryiJq ito ireluaim en thll HPL in ocrtc 1982
~1982 - MaU tiP cap -gtill arM (95 X 100) with ooil ani 10 1111 po1ywthyl tD provont infiltnticn tna ~ CDltD1nltim
ICaith 1983 - EPA _u that IUIROOO clovolop JWtP to MEW u bMU for lB ooopirq
_ lllBl - ~to -1 Action (IliA) authariMd by EPA Roqicn IliA Authoriutim mitt to Dshy~-Divioicn
- EPA ani aixa1trlcton -UiMd tDbullitbull putially datU ~ of -~y1046
taw of CD1Ia1Mtod ooil shyirq 50 liP tol)Ot vollraquo ani llhlR-1 tD- __ City NY
- trial ~ ot bullite taJowl for orrioo of-ani -u -(CDR)
July 1985 - IUIFlT - Tedlniool ~w Doat (lUI) tD initioto bull llOIoticn ~~era at the bullita
- lliiFlT Cltlrlbto rint ~irq ran~ of u afaoa wter wd plltable woll ~yz port~ by ClP or by IUIFlT in holraquoo ocr-Urq
- IUInT Cltlrlbto ai1IIW)in ani ootoblUMo oaqgtlo grid of tha oito soan ran of oaqgtlirq of ooilo gron wtarallfece wter ard patable wall wtar ~ ard ~ inshy
- -t1njo _ PA ani IUIFlT 1shy tD cxrclulo that - SOlvage
-lll85-llllylll86 -middot Yard Site t not Utable far dlllletial rraa NPL _uy c11rwto IUIFlT tD ~ cno Wtional oaoplirq ran tD ciofino - or ~icbll COItainatim an plpaae a riold octivitibull --ry npgtrt
llly1916 - IUlPll - third -llzq rtUlllof u rcantter~wa~ater
- IUlPll CD1tncta IOlrVW)IzqAult)uot 1916 --middot ~tDIOlrVW)oitoon1---middot lilY 1917 - RfM-m tooo -i--lt -iPt 148-1134 to ontJct an RIPSinYooti9otiltln ot tho oito
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
shy
- B nctifibull Maine tEP that ~ SalWIJI Yard bullitbull hM riwd a HRS
-lll82
Soon or 39 61 juotiryiJq ito ireluaim en thll HPL in ocrtc 1982
~1982 - MaU tiP cap -gtill arM (95 X 100) with ooil ani 10 1111 po1ywthyl tD provont infiltnticn tna ~ CDltD1nltim
ICaith 1983 - EPA _u that IUIROOO clovolop JWtP to MEW u bMU for lB ooopirq
_ lllBl - ~to -1 Action (IliA) authariMd by EPA Roqicn IliA Authoriutim mitt to Dshy~-Divioicn
- EPA ani aixa1trlcton -UiMd tDbullitbull putially datU ~ of -~y1046
taw of CD1Ia1Mtod ooil shyirq 50 liP tol)Ot vollraquo ani llhlR-1 tD- __ City NY
- trial ~ ot bullite taJowl for orrioo of-ani -u -(CDR)
July 1985 - IUIFlT - Tedlniool ~w Doat (lUI) tD initioto bull llOIoticn ~~era at the bullita
- lliiFlT Cltlrlbto rint ~irq ran~ of u afaoa wter wd plltable woll ~yz port~ by ClP or by IUIFlT in holraquoo ocr-Urq
- IUInT Cltlrlbto ai1IIW)in ani ootoblUMo oaqgtlo grid of tha oito soan ran of oaqgtlirq of ooilo gron wtarallfece wter ard patable wall wtar ~ ard ~ inshy
- -t1njo _ PA ani IUIFlT 1shy tD cxrclulo that - SOlvage
-lll85-llllylll86 -middot Yard Site t not Utable far dlllletial rraa NPL _uy c11rwto IUIFlT tD ~ cno Wtional oaoplirq ran tD ciofino - or ~icbll COItainatim an plpaae a riold octivitibull --ry npgtrt
llly1916 - IUlPll - third -llzq rtUlllof u rcantter~wa~ater
- IUlPll CD1tncta IOlrVW)IzqAult)uot 1916 --middot ~tDIOlrVW)oitoon1---middot lilY 1917 - RfM-m tooo -i--lt -iPt 148-1134 to ontJct an RIPSinYooti9otiltln ot tho oito
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
-iamplamplo of dielectric fluid ~ craite in u at ltiepiM trca me to eiflt feet Dictll-- -1 in -m portion oo lirg grid - to bo dgratirgAroclor U60 in 23 ail Nq)lbull fral thne to eiltllt feet in depth Aroclor 1260 in N1iment atmp1e of cnoitA pcrd (9100 Rgtl surface wter eaplbull clean ~ for tnce of Hg
---CD1talllinatAd withctUorcbenzera no PCBII trace of -otic~ Tap wter clean except for ~ and
- the 2 ug1 ML
-------of tho docuooont
IIOTlCE If the fllbull 1bullbull1bull 11 teu clear than thla PINETTES SALVAGE YARD ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD notlco It lo duo to tho
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
--
oyoc PntUbull Lob oontallllnation by tho foll~~ bla (2~1) prtllalata di - thy1prthalata di-n-blt)1Pgttllalata 33 - dichl~icWw Aroclor 1260 -s In oodlmont M~~ple ttl in varyirq ~ OWitntiarw in nplicate uplbull Data CXJUld Rlt validated Pield ocntudnatim allo paible to agtp1aln ot tho~ 1latadabow
c~ May 19-23 1986
~ To ctgttaln UUtianol onolyticol data - to dataislno tho 1ataru W vertical CICUnt ot PCB ~tion t tha bullita
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
bullbullbull
l
2-16
QlqrM or Site QriMinltim
opIOCpnhlbull
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
QlqrM or Site QriMinltim
opIOCpnhlbull
au~ in five 5) aanplbull (3 to Rlbl Dioloctric fluill u tu DlctlorctlZOnO in fall (4) ~- (56 to 1300 Rlbl 1 2 4- trichlorotZMlll in five (5) ~- (141gt-3600 Rlbl ~ (ogricWturol -) Arclor 1260 UO to 1300000 Rlbl In oollto No --1-YOlatUbull in -1imlnt-1shysJyolatllbull trace s-ticidel In~shy
~ 11011 onal~ cuoplotoly nj-=tad tauM of -=-uiVII bgtlcllnr tl- (41 cloyo OIOV) All VCCa ~ WA ~tad Field bank u cxm-inatad with _ lobntory CgtCI1talllinont _t
ampgtrin fiold lwdlinshy- CXIItalnonto
cxn-inltim bJt nplicate ~--~middotshymiddot
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
-Sal-Yard SitBit~
_ of IIEIP1r - IRI DIIICluoiaw
IRA ~tul in ~Jn) ~ly CXI1taainat 11 thcul Arolor 1260 an1 vari~ d1~ till cdst within bull 07 acr ana
ot -shy --thin 50 p Dopth of IXlntaalnotiCIgt only partially clofiiWI ooxiJuo dopth of ~~- olrJt (8) f- (ol +469 IISL) shycxntaainlltim by Arolclor 1260 a 11Jcely to cdst teuM of peroolatim parM~tim or diftuaim
xtorolly oontiJugtlo cloy loyor t1gta41t to oodat -=- tho oit eervin u an ~le barrie for vertical Arcclor 1260 lli9rotimiddot JU1zontal algroti of ~ ia -blo
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
PINETTES SALVAGE FEASIBILITY STUDY
PRELIMINARY SCOPING
POTENTIAL REMEDIAL ACTIONS
No Action Libullited Action (1) Soil Remdiation Only (2) Groundwater Re11adiation Only Coeplete Re111adiation of Soil and Groundwater
RESPONSE OBJECTIVES
Reduce hUIIampn health risks fr011 exposure to PCh and other contuinanta to acceptable l evels (10-bull to 10middot ranae)
Reduce threat of environmental daaa fro PCh and other eontuinanu to acceptable levels
Prevent bulliaration of PCBs and other eontuinanta to other anviron~~antal media and additional exposure points (aa Aroonook River)
C011ply with federal atata and local AltARs
Provide a perbullanent coat- middot tfactiva solution to the contuination preblebull at the site
RESPONSE CATEGORIES
Ko Action Source Control (1) Containment (2) Treatment 11anaaeeent of Hiaution (1) Contairw~ent (2) Trutmant
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
TSCA naulationbull prohibit land dbpoul of 11ateriab containinamp IDOU than SOO ppm PCS
PCBbull an included in California Lilt wastes recently restricted under RCRA Land Disposal Ban-land disposal of materials conlidarad RCRA wastes that also contain more than SO ppm PCBs is proh i bited a s of July 7 1987
232Sd081487
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
Undar Land Dilpoul Ban land dhpoul of soils and debris containina 50-500 ppl and re110vad undar CERCI Sections 104 and 106 will be perbullittad until Nova~abar 7 1988
UNUSUAUUNIQUE FEATURES OF PINETTES SALVAGE CONTAMINATION PROBLEMJmiddot
bull Site location bullaku costs of transportation for off-site traatbullant ~middot disposal vary hiah but abo contributes aianificantly to ~ tJ obilbationdaiiObilization costs for on-sita trut1nnt Conlidarina ~ this tradeoff will bbull a bullbullJor componut of tb fusibility study (will ba stronaly dependent on the aount of bullbullterial requirinamp trut11ant)
Groundwnar aituation is essentially a coa~plata unknown-may ba coe~plataly uncontaminated due to confininamp layer and low 110bility of PCBI or 111ay contain a tromiddotphua system (oilwatar) that has arutly anhancad the 1110bility of PCBI and resulted in aianificant miaration
Problabull is apparently confined to PCBs and chlorobanzanasbullthus 11any sinalamiddotstap innovative tachnoloaiu for PCB traatbullant bullay ba affective at the site (La c011plex trutbullant trains for re1110val dutruction of multiple contaminants are unlikely
Hany innovative cost-cortpatitiva tachnoloaiu are availaoh for traat11ant of PCB-contuinatad materials at the bench scala however bullany of tlasa tachnoloaiu have not baan pilot bulltastad Jntorbullation fr011 currant pilot testa in Raaion I (New Bedford) and Raai n II (Wide Buch) should ba available for Pinettas FS
A ver) Uaitad nu11bar of facilitiu are currently pn1dttad for PCB diaposl either by incineration or landfillina (preliminary uti111ata - 3bull4 incineration facilities 3middot4 land disposal facilities)
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
middotlmiddot
All trutllent alternativu (wexcaption of in-aitu vitrification) i nvolve excavation - in-aitu tnet11ant bullathoda for PCImiddotcontalllinetad 111teriah an not aanually 1vailabh
PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Tnatbullant tachnoloaiu 111ay be classified into l aroupa
(1) Comucidly available proven taehnoloaiaa (2) Pilotbulltutad uchnoloaiu (3) Banch-acala tachnoloaiu that have not bn fiald-testad
~ ~achnoloaiu could be alibullinatad in praliainary acreenina on tha ~Jmiddot nil of pilot-tutina (La tachnoloaiu that are available only at1TV h bench scala would be ali11inated)
232Sd081487
)
I 8 N
iOncEifnll=~ It leu oloor thu thlo PINETTcS SALVAGE YARD notice It 11 4u to tho ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
of the docubulltnt
lU~tAUe M(l 01 e j18lJaq
6up--lue -AI8J1-IID
8S881 MtllIU -OOd 0Sj8 IUOf l _6amp1 J lU-llaJllllfS
bullUJ 01 DlqtJJidd8 lOU_ lfMtl
pol8 1-oo f A18 Pifllo_lUOJ alfllb
bullraquobull~middot -t6ototq albullP 01
II lOS PlWbullIluoJ-~ IOJ p8l181Uftbulljj0
1-0JSUUl JOJ lUll 88~middot1D d
flMfJ8u middotseu 101
jnJIIISII Cjj8 1U810
bull qlftlfl UIGJ IIUaAO 18t6ot0U~l
IMtl0 Ol paltiMoJ USOJAIioeue-o
bull I Lal$ Dl CKI$
-ubullbulltmiddotDIil bull1~--01-J
finS IOlJt) bull000 [$ Ol 0001$
I t--NP) bull IMlS
bull061$ Dl fKI$
UOj ltJfjddt Still IOJ C6ot0Ull381
UOId 8 lOU It 1 1 J8Aatto0tt II I DS 111 1 p8ltjlOSII8
SJjUtlioO lltllO put 18~ ltootsep A C6otouHil bulltill
middot1etU -011uoJ bullt SJIOIl-bullbullIMI1 JO SSIIUIIA1~JJII ltq1 pue pell f11113U~3middot11-ueeq
lOU IIA UMtpOId UO jlleotlll bullst~lUO Zl middotlt Ul Hd 01 U~l SSIII 01 Sll st)j piiJilj)lll
Sllj 0318() middotslSIIl 11183S bullIIJUIICI Uj oedd l Uetl1 ISII SSII 01 tIIIW JO Uf p1111ns s bull 3-01
S IIII Hd-qos 01 SUOf11111UIIJU03
st)j 6ut3ftP_ JO lqadeJ ltlbullt1U111Gl bull3111 Z03 01
SJfue61o s nopbull~ez~ llttflO pue Sft)l JO UOf1ep fxO Uf S1 11S811
SljUI6JO 18410 put SQ)I J O UOlMUlSiitp
Uj SlPlSitl UOliPUIj UO~OM put OS Mfl
-oJ S IIW JO UQjllOUlltll llf spje JUUaue 3ftHKeOJn ltlll
middotJtUaua ~tuMultn pue uonbullt PbullI 111JOfAU11n o1
pesoclxa JtJsnoeue11ntS S n1x1bull lltl1 po~e peppe st -lO 8111~ IU81 6utxtbull
I 01UI tlftiS e se Plll _ SJjOS PllleUtbullbull1uoJ
bull(bull3111 IltU1011) IIICIIJeAe ale SIISSII3
-oul e3tOOOCI 1IMI10 middotst~luoel u-lt 101
paamp~ej-pue pue S1UIIjllllU ptJe S8-qOIIJbull JO UOjl
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
AIJWI N IIJ JO JO NOllllllt)$]0 WIOlHlllll ]SiiiOIIISlllll UIONNOCI 1500 Ol1YW11Sl SlAU)lf80 lSIIIOIIISlll lAtlWH]lTt lAilWHU11f
U~YUIf
IHioooUt1uoJI SJAtllfIIIIIIIJlll 11ft0lNllll JO lllloJS utlfIIIINITJIW
(
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
i ~~ 5 lishy
~ i i f
~ tcmiddot~ ~1t1r ~ti ~~~~~ ~
imiddot ~
ii~i ~
1~~-bulli s middot~
~Jampit ~i$~~
Ei ~~~=~i~5
illilmlill~i i-s~~E~j
-~~ mHi~~~ middotmiddotrmiddotmiddot middotr
~ ~ ~~~ ~sl ~~ ~i~ i~Ss
~~B~Jv~ iH~i~im~~~ghHi mi~tH
~meuro~Jm 8
~~v Ji~- ~~=lii~~
~L~
~ c
2c~middot ~ ~
fj~o
-iiL~~= ~
E~ijioi~ ti~immm ~i
~~~slji mhHm~J~gtfE
~~ ~~~~~~~f~h H~wmm~
bulleh=~~Pi~~~q~rmiddot~~i
~middot ~mi1hH
H~~~h~Fmiddot i~iiii~i
~
h I
bullbull amp
bull -~
~i ~ee
w~
-a ~
ozeJ ~~
middotshy~middot
~~d
iE5
io
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
PINETTES SALVAGE
POTENTIAL FOR EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expadiud Response Action (ERA) would be applicable only to contuinatad soils at the site
Because the ERA would be a non-timemiddotcritieal removal action (La the aite dou not present an illllediate uvue thrut to public health and the environment) an anatnrina avaluationcoJt analysis (EECA) il required The EECA should aatilfy four aoals
(1) provide a 11athodoloay for avaluatina and uleetina an altunative uchno loampY for waste disposition to 11nsun that the uchnology is sound and appropriate for the apacific aita
(2) fulfill the n~uinmantl of the Natioral EnviroMantal Policy Act (NEPA) for non middottile-critical u1110val actions ERAs
(3) provide n provad documentation for re110val action aahetion to hcilitate cost reeovary afort1o and
(4) provide better documentation of the dechion-maltinamp procus for removal actions for inclusion in the adlllinistrative record
Substantively the EECA is vuy similar to a focuud Fusibility Study - shyllternltives are developed evaluated for efhctivenen enaineerinamp practicability and cost and a prahrnd alternative is uhcted and i11plemented for the re110val action The EECA includes the followinamp steps
Site Characterization Identification of Removal Action Objectives Identification of Removal Action Alurnativu Initial Scresnina of Removsl Action Alternltivu Analysis of Remlininamp Removal Action Alternatives Compantive Analysis of Removal Action Alternatives
The 11ajor adventaaa in perfor~~~ina an ERA It the Pinettes Salv1ae site would be that the sehcted source control alternative I be i11plemented 110re rapidly than throuah the RIFS-ROD-RDRA procen However there are aeveral potential problams that could delay tha ERA procen or result in the implementation of a re1110val alternative that b not cost-effective or pen~anent Then problems inc lude
Lack of volume data for the source area at the site Evaluation of reiDedial alternatives in the FS or tbe EpoundCA process will stronaly depend on the
232Sd081481
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075
~ -of splbull to~ tolgtonltary Anal~ for ~- s-ishyVolatilbull vo 8ld ~
lllo (2) pQblo wll wtr(~flr)- D WJ-fJriw(5)- r- u IQgtr (4) ourtooo wtr ~(14)__
Ton (10) ooil
-------IIO
TICE If tllo fllbull 1-t
It ltN oltor tlo
uth
lt netlct It lo
~ to tho
PIN
ET
TE
S
SAL
VA
GE
Y
AR
D
AO
HIN
IST
RA
TIV
E
RE
CO
RD
o
f tllo bullbullbullbullbullt
~~ ~-~ ~
~
t i ~ ~
~ i tl i
s I 1
~ s
6 sJ ~
l iEi 1
~ ~~~i
~ ~ E
iffbullj I ~
ifff-fli l ifi~~~~
~ 1
a~~~~ ~~~
i ~~~ ~~
~ i
I ~o~
~ ~a
1~ ~
I ~ itJli l N
tli 1 1 1fl il ~ ii1~1-il
11 1 lI
IJIll itlfilill middotlitit l
J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
~ I
~I8
(
0
barcode 581424
barcodetext SDMS Doc ID 581424
-2shy
volume of contuinaud bulleterhl to be re110ved treeted and this inforMetion will not be vdhble without site chuacurhation efforu
A detdled risk anbullnbullent hu not bn perfor11ad Thus clunbullup levels for soils caMot be adequetely specified and the n110vel action 11ay rnult in re110valtnatbullent of either 110re or len soil than would be required by riskmiddotbaud criuria
Alurnativu for PCI trnt11ent and disposal include a wida unabull of apparently costmiddotcompatitiva tachnoloaiu which are 1110ra thorouamphly evaluated throuah the FS process than the EECA proceu Also land disposal options for PCBs as uhcted for the previous removal action are vary limited
The EECA process would addreu only the aourca ana whereas the RIFS proceu wJuld i ntearate source control and manaaement of miaretion options to se lect the 1110st afacttve remedy for the entire site For axuple traet11ent of conumineted oil could pouit-ly be achieved by the sue Method used for soH trUtllent which could lead to the selection of an warall solution that is 110ra costbullaffective than sapuate ra11edial acdons for soil (based on the EE CA) and aroundwatar (baud on the FS)
The EECA Guidance Hanual is i n draft forbull and experience within EPA and ita contractors with the EE CA procns is limited (ea Merican TherMOstat)
Based on thua factors we beHave that a permanent costbulleffective reaedy for the Pinattaa Salvaae eite can but be selected throuah the RIFS process
232Sd081487
Pt4anl AIAi e ltbull tL)
(middot Chlorobenaene 0 418
1 2-Dichlorobenaene
1 3-Dichlorobenaene f J-1-14-Dichlorobenaene 0 075