Golder Associates Inc. 305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. LaureL NJ USA 08054 Tel: (609) 273-1110 Fax (609) 273-0778 ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONIFEASffiiLITY STUDY 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTSLETTERREPORT DISTRmUTION: 2 Copies - USEPA Prepared for: SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. Three Greenwood Square 3329 Street Road · Bensalem, Pennsylvania 2 Copies - SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. 1 Copy CH2M Hill- Murray Rosenberg 1 Copy - PADER- Jeff Silar 1 Copy - PADER- Tom Lever 2 Copies r- Golder Associates Inc. ,. June 1995 Project No.: 923-6053 AR307609 OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA CANADA GERMANY, HUNGARY. ITALY, SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES ///5J7 --
33
Embed
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY … · (Appendix E of RI/FS Workpleinl 060 063 064 ... CFc'Cz I) • ... ·~ ... the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Golder Associates Inc.
305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. LaureL NJ USA 08054 Tel: (609) 273-1110 Fax (609) 273-0778
ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONIFEASffiiLITY STUDY
1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTSLETTERREPORT
DISTRmUTION:
2 Copies - USEP A
Prepared for:
SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. Three Greenwood Square
3329 Street Road · Bensalem, Pennsylvania
2 Copies - SCA Setvices ofPennsylvania, Inc. 1 Copy CH2M Hill- Murray Rosenberg 1 Copy - P ADER- Jeff Silar 1 Copy - P ADER- Tom Lever 2 Copies r- Golder Associates Inc. ,.
June 1995 Project No.: 923-6053 AR307609
OFFICES IN AUSTRALIA CANADA GERMANY, HUNGARY. ITALY, SWEDEN, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES
///5J7 --
Golder Associates Inc.
305 Fellowship Road, Suite 200 Mt. Laurel. NJ USA 08054 Tel: (609)273-1110 Fax (609) 273-0778
June 19, 1995
SCA Services ofPennsylvania, Inc. Three Greenwood Square 3329 Street Road Bensalem, PA 19020
Attn: Mr. Trevan.· Houser/Mr. Glen Schultz
Project No.: 923-6053
RE: ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS . 1995 RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS LETTER REPORT
Gentlemen:
Golder Associates.Inc. (Golder) is pleased to forward herewith two copies of our Report on the Results of the 1995 Residential Well Sampling Event at the Elizabethtown Landfill which was conducted on April 25, 1995. This document includes the sampling results in USEPA Region III format that was used for Volume III of the Remedial Investigation Report dated May 1994. Please note that to finalize the metals results tables provided on June 6, 1995, two • changes were made. The CRDL column for sample RES21 contained the IDL information. The correct CRDLs now appear in this column. On page two, the parameter calcium was listed twice. The first listing for calcium was actually the cadmium data. The parameter name and CRDL have been corrected. Two copies of the Report have been sent directly to the USEP A In addition, one copy has been sent to Murray Rosenberg, CH2M Hill, one copy to Tom Lever at P ADER, and one copy to Jeff Silar at P ADER
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.
~k~ GeO arrest, P.G., C.P.Eng. Project Manager Project Director and Associate
DESClUP'ItON OP IMAGEllY Pwlt c_~~ Pn 'uM-e.. (.;-t4#u- SOlA rCeY.
wfl&'~. :)6@ ?f<tct-k . CFc'Cz I)
•
...
·~
AR3076l7
June 1995 -Al- . 923-:6053
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Golder has validated the analytical data for the residential well samples collected April 25, 1995 in the vicinity of the Elizabethtown Lanlifill (Site) in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The samples were collected at the request of the USEP A. Samples were collected from .four residences as shown on Table 1 of the main report. The samples were collected in accordance with the Field Sampling Plan (FSP) and the Quality Assurance. Project Plan (QAPjP) contained in the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Work Plan for the Site. The samples were analyzed for the Inorganic Target Analyte List (TAL) in accordance with the :tJ.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA) Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for Inorganics Analysis, Multi-Media, MultiConcentration (CLP SOW ILM03.0); and the Organic Target Compound List (TCL}, excluding Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in accordance with the Superfund Analytical Methods for Low Concentration Water for Organics Analysis (SAM) dated 10/92. Reporting of tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) was 'not required by the QAPjP. The analyses were performed by CompuChem Environmental Corporation (CompuChem) of Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Samples were collected from four (4) primary locations. One sampling location (RES02) was sampled in duplicate for Field Duplicate analysis. All of the samples for metals analysis were collected as unfiltered (total) portions only.
The Sample Identification Points are summarized in Table 1 of the Report.
Data validation of inorganic data collected using the CLP SOW ILM03.0 was performed in accordance with the Region III Modifications to the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses (dated April, 1993). Data validation for organic data collected using the SAM was. performed in accordance with the USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (dated February 1994) and Region III Modifications to the National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review, Multi-Media, Multi-concentration (dated September ~994). These documents are referred to as "functional guidelines" hereafter.
In general, the discussions which follow in Sections 2.0 through 5.0 describe only instances where the quality control criteria specified in the documents named above were not met. Tables A2 through AS of this document summarize specific samples for which qualification occurred. ·
Data qualifiers are defined in Table A1. Where quality control criteria were met, positive results were qualified as acceptable (no code) and non-detected results were qualified with a "U" flag signifying that the result is below the quantitation limit (organics) or detection limit (inorganics). Where more than one qualifier for a sample result was warranted, the most predominant or general qualifier was applied to the results. For ~ .. · example, a positive result for a volatil~ organic compound may need to be qualified as estimated (J) due to the initial or continuing calibration criteria not having been met, but this compound is also present in the a~sociated blanks and the blank action level is greater than the concentration of the compound reported in the sample. In this particular case, the compound would be qualified as "B" indicating that the concentration
Golder Associates aR301G\8
June 1995 -A2- 923-6053
is not substantially' greater than the concentration in the associated blanks. The (R) qualifier, which signifies .that the result has been rejected, takes priority over all other qualifiers. It should be noted that the discussions contained within Sections 2.0 through 5.0 explain where quality control was deficient. As specified in the functional guidelines, if the non-adherence to quality control criteria are slight, qualification of data may not be warranted. However, if the non-adherence is significant, qualification and possible rejection of the data may be necessary. The narrative discussion specifies where rejection of the data is necessary.
Following data validation and qualification, the analytical data and qualifiers for each sample point were summarized. Qualified results are provided in Appendix B of this Report in the USEPA Region III Format as previously used in Volume III of the Elizabethtown Landfill R]/FS Report dated May 1994.
Golder Assoclatft\ R 3 0 7 6 I 9
June 1995 -A3- 923-6053
2.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST VOLATILE ORGANIC PARAMETERS
Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate and one trip blank was collected for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The sampl~s were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for VOCs using the SAM dated 10/92. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Precision: Goals for laboratory and field precision were generally met, except where noted below.
Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.
Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported in the raw data.
Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all samples except sample ·RES20.
Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in. this data set. A total of 200 results for these samples were reported in which 175 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 88% for these samples which meets the RI/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.
Major Deficiencies
Identified below are the major deficiencies which required rejection of the data. Refer to Table A2 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.
The initial and/or continuing calibrations had response factors (RRF) which were less than the· minimum of 0.05 for Acetone, 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone, 2-Hexanone, 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane and 2-Butanone. Since these c;ompounds were undetected in all samples in this SDG, the results were qualified as rejected (R). ·
Minor Deficiencies
Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table A2 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.
Laboratory preparation blanks, storage blanks and trip blanks are evaluated for target compound conta:nUnation. Methylene chloride was found as a contaminant in various blanks for this SDG. Samples associated with these blanks required qualification. For Methylene Chloride, an action limit of 10 times· the concentration found in the blank was calculated. For sample FRES02 where Methylene Chloride was detected as a positive
Golder Associates'\ R 3 0 7 6 2 0
June 1995 -A4- 923-6053
result between the Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL) and the action limit, the result was flagged with the (B) qualifier.
The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/4/95 for Acetone, Methylene Chloride, 2-Butanone and 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane. The above listed compounds have been previously qualified for various deficiencies and require no additional qualification.
The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 30% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/7/95 for Acetone. Since Acetone was previously qualified "R", the affected samples (RES02, RES20, RES21 and RES22) required no additional qualification.
Sample point RES20 was inadvertently analyzed at a 2.3:1 dilution. By the time the laboratory realized of the dilution, the sample was outside of the hold time window. The data was reported with elevated detection limits, no qualification of the sample data was required.
Golder Associates t\R30762\
June 1995 -AS- 923-6053
3.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC PARAMETERS
Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and pnalyzed for SVOCs using the SAM dated 10/92 .. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.
Data Quality Objectives
Precision: Goals for laboratory and field precision were generally met, except where noted below.
·Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.
Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported in the raw data.
Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all analyses.
Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in this data set. A total qf 300 results for these samples were reported in which 296 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 99% for these samples which meets the RI/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.
Major Deficiencies
Identified below are the major deficiencies which required rejection of the data. Refer to Table A3 for the spe~ific samples affected by each deficiency.
The initial and/or continuing calibrations had response factors (RRF) which were less than the minimum of 0.05 for 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since this compound was undetected in the affected samples (RES21, RES20, FRES02 and RES22) in this SDG, the results were
. qualified as unusable (R).
Minor Deficiencies
Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table A3 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.
According to the SAM the laboratory is required to re-extract and analyze any sample that yield low surrogate recoveries for two or more base-neutral surrogates and/or acid surrogates. Low surrogate recoveries were a problem for sample RES02. As required by the SAM, the laboratory re-extracted the sample for analysis. The re-extraction of sample RES02 was performed outside of the seven day hold time window. As a result, all compounds in sample RES02 were qualified as estimated quantitation limits (UJ).
Golder Associates AR307622
.
June 1995 -A6- 923-6053
The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/15/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine, Butylbenzylphthalate, 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine, Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and Di-n-butylphthalate. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required.
The functional guidelines require that the calculated response factors remain stable over the concentration range of the initial calibration ( <30% RSD). This criterion was not achieved for the initial calibrations analyzed on 5/17/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in the affected sample (re-analysis of RES02), no qualification was required.
The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 25% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/16/95 for 4-Chloroaniline, N-Nitrosodiphenylamine and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required. ·
The functional guidelines require the percent differences for the response factors between the initial and continuing daily calibration be less than + 25% difference. This criteria was not achieved for the continuing daily calibration analyzed on 5/16/95 for 4-Chlo roaniline, N -Nitrosodiphenylamine, Bu tylbenzylp h thala te, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Di-n-octylphthalate and 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Since the above listed compounds were not detected in any of the affected samples, no qualification was required.
AR307623 Golder Associates
June 1995 -A7- 923-6053
4.0 TARGET COMPOUND LIST PESTICIDES
Samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for Pesticides. The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for Pesticides using the SAM dated 10/92. PCBs analysis was not requested because PCBs are not Compounds of concern (COCs) for the Site (meeting with USEPA on November 9, 1992). The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.
Data Qualitr Objectives
Precision: Goals for laboratory and field 'precision were generally met, except where noted below.
Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generaJly met, except where noted below.
Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported ifl the raw data. Positive presence of a TCL pesticide must . be confirmed by analysis on a dissimilar chromatographic column. Quantitation is performed for each column and the lower value is reported by the laboratory. The percent difference between the two results is calculated and reported by the laboratory.
Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all analyses.
Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) samples were validated in this data set. A total of 105 results for these samples were reported in which 105 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 100% for these samples which meets the Rl/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.
Major Defi~iencies
· There were no major deficiencies whi~h would have required rejection of the data.
Minor Deficiencies
Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data .. Refer to Table A4 for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.
The matrix spike recovery for Heptachlor Epoxide was slightly outside the QC limits specified in the SAM. Using professional judgement, the data validator deemed that qualification of the non-detected result in the primary sample was not necess~ry.
The matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate relative percent differences for gamma-BHC, Endrin, and gamma-Chlordane were slightly above the control limits specified in the
. SAM. Using professional judgement, the data validator deemed that qualification of the non-detected results in the primary sample was not necessary.
Golder Associates AR307624
June 1995 -A8- 923-6053
For pesticides analysis, if an analyte is detected on both GC columns, quantitation is performed for both columns and the lower of the two values is reported. The percent differences between the two values were greater than 25% for Endosulfan ·Sulfate in sample RES02 and Heptachlor, alpha-Chlordane, and Heptachlor Epoxide in sample RES20. All of these results were qualified as estimated values G).
Concentrations below the laboratory-derived method detection limits (MDLs) were reported for Endosulfan II and Endosulfan Sulfate in sample RES02 and for Heptachlor and Endosulfan Sulfate in sample RES20. These results were qualified with an asterisk on the data tables to indicate that the concentrations are below the MDLs.
Golder Associates AR307625
June1995 -A9- 923-6053
5.0 TARGET ANALYTE LIST INORGANIC PARAMETERS
Unfiltered samples were collected from four (4) residential wells. Additionally, one well was sampled in duplicate for TAL Inorganics (metals and cyanide). The samples were grouped into one SDG by the laboratory and analyzed for metals and cyanide using the CLP SOW ILM03.0. The SDG was validated in accordance with the functional guidelines.
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Precision: Goals for laboratory and field precision were generally met, except where noted below.
Accuracy: Goals for accuracy were generally met, except where noted below.
Sample Result Verification: All sample results were supported in the raw data.
Detection Limits: The detection limit goals were achieved for all analyses.
Completeness: The data packages were complete for all requested analyses. Five (5) unfiltered samples were validated in this data set. A total of 120 results for unfiltered samples were reported in which 120 were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 100% for unfiltered samples which meets the RT/FS Work Plan objective of 85%.
Major Deficiencies
There were no major deficiencies which would have required rejection of the data.
Minor Deficiencies
Identified below are the minor deficiencies which required qualification of the data. Refer to Table AS for the specific samples affected by each deficiency.
Various metals were found to be present in the blanks associated with these samples. Action levels were . calculated for each of these analyt~s based upon the highest concentration found in the associated blanks. Positive results in the samples greater than the instrument detection limit (IDL) but less than the action level were qualified with a B indicating that the analyte was detected substantially above the level reported in the associated blanks. Positive results above the action level and non-detected results did not require qualification.
Lead was detected in the laboratory blanks at negative absorbances indicating that sample results may ·have been negatively influenced. The non-detected results for this analyte required qualification as biased low detection limits (UL). Positive results for this· analyte required qualification as biased low values (L).
Golder AssociatAR 3 0 7 6 2 6
June 1995 -AlO- 923-6053
6.0 SUMMARY
Validation of the data collected for the 1995 Residential Well Sampling Event in the vicinity of the Elizabethtown Landfill was performed in accordance with the most current versions of the USEPA Region III data validation guidelines and the QAPjP.
Overall, the data required qualification due to some quality control criteria which were not achieved, but the majority of the data may be deemed usable. Although a positive result was qualified as estimated, the analyte should be considered present. Similarly, a non-detected result which was qualified as an estimated quantitation/detection limit should be considered not present for the purposes of this study, although the limit itself may not be precise. Rejected (unusable) data that are assigned the "R" qualifier should not be used. Rejected data have been included in the summary tables only for the purpose of completeness.
z:\6053\95samp\rw95.nar
Golder Associates AR307627
June 1995 923-6053
TABLEAl
GWSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES
CODES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION (confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):
U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximate sample concentration necessary to be detected.
NO CODE= Confirmed identification.
B = Not detected substantially above the level reported in laboratory or field blanks.
R = Unusable result. Analyte ~ay or may not be present in the sample.
N = Tentative identification. Consider present.
CODES RELATED TO OUANTITATION . (can be used for both positive results and sample quantitation/detection limits):
J = Analyte present. Reported value may not be accurate or precise.
K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower. ·
L. = Analyte present. Reported value may be bia.Sed low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
UJ = Not detected. Quantitation/detection limits may be inaccurate or impr.ecise.
UL = Not detected. Quantitation/detection limit is probably higher.
OTHER CODES
NJ = Qualitative identification questionable due to poor resolution. Presumptively present at approximate quantity.
Matl Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point
FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 2.3 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA
Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result <5 R ·5 <5 R 11 <11 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2
. <5 R 5 <5 R 11 <11 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 R 1 <1 R 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2
. <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 . u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 . u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 . u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 <5 R 5 <5 R 11 <11
-·
(1') Sample Quantitation Umit (SQL) Is the CRQL multiplied by the dilution factor and adjlltlted for percent moisture as appropriate. W The Qual column Indicates the qualifier applied to the result following data validation <- below).
C.O "Result below the laboratofy MJL. NA- Not Applicabfe.
u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 R 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 ,, u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 u 1 R 5
,J - Estimated (Semiquantitative) Data UJ - Nat Detected/Estimated Data R- Unusable Data K- Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U - Nat DetectediQuarditatiYe Data Q- Nat Applicable
Result Qual <5 R <1. u <1 u <1 u <1. u
•<1 u <5 R <1 u <1 u <1" u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 R <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 . u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <1 u <5 R
L - Biased Low (SemlquantitatiYe) Data UL - Nat Delecled/Biaeed La.v N - T entalive ldentillcation B-~ In aaoclated blanks (Semlquanlilatlve Data) (No Code)- Confirmed ldentlflcalion
ACCESS\Itown.mb1~ Nf)Ort.-
923-6053
Sample Point RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual 5 <5 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 5 <5 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u
I 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 R 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 -u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 ' u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 5 <5 R
P8ge 1
June 1995 SUMMARY OF CLP ORGANICS ANALYSES ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS
Residential Well Sample Results Volatile Organlca
Matl riX: Residential Well$ Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point
l:ll :0 (.,)
0 -.J (7\
c...:> 0"'1
Sample Point FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21
Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4I2SI95 Date Sampled: ~ Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 2.3 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA
CRQL Pa,rameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result
5 4-Methyf-2-Pentanone 5 <5 R .5 <5 R 11 <11 2 Methylene Chloride 2 1 B 2 <2 u 5 <5
1 styrene 1 <1 ·u f <1 u 2 <2 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Tetrachloroethene 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2
1 Toluene 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 -
1 1,1,1-Trlchloroethene 1 • <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2
1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Trlchloroethene 1 8 1 8 2 <2 1 Vlnyt Chloride 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 1 Total Xyfenes 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 2 <2 .
Notes: All unh are pg/1.. Sample Quantllation Umlt (SOL) Is the CRQL multiplied boJ the dll'ullon fador and adjusted for percent moisture as appropriate. The Qual column lndicat• the qualifier llpplied lo the reUt follaMng data validation <-below). "Resuut below ltle labondofy Kll.. NA • Not Applk:able.
J • E&tim«Md (Semiquantitatiw) Data UJ ·Not Detec!ediEalmated Data R • Unuuble Data K ·Biased High (Semiquantlta1iw) Data U ·Not Detec!ed/Quantilatiw Data Q • Not Appl'k:able
Result <5 <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
L • Biased Low (Semlquantltatiw) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low N • Tentatiw ldeniJk:ation
Qual R u u u u u u u u u u
B-~In aaociaCed b1anb (Semlquantltatiw Data) (No Code) ·Confirmed ldentlllcaflon
~~
923-6053
5arnple Point RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Mollsture: NA SQL Result Qual
5 <5 R 2 <2 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u 1 <1 u
~2
]:II
:xJ (....)
a .....,J
0'\ eN ......,J
June
5
ANALYSES _ RI/FS
Residential Well Sample Results Semivolatile Organics
'Matrix: Residential Well Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point
FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Mo·isture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA
CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result 5 Acenaphthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 - Acenaphthylene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ . 5 <5 5 Anthra<:ene 5 <5" u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(a)Anthracene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Butytbenzylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Chloro-3-Methy1phenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 4-Chloroaniline 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-Chloroelhoxy)Methane 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-Chloroethyl)ethe 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Chloronaphthalene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2-Chlorophenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5. <5 5 4-Chlorophenyl-phen 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Chrysene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dlbenz(a,h)Antlncene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dibenzofuran 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldlne 5 <5 R 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,4-Dichlorophenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Diethylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,4-Dlmethylphenol 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Dimethyl Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Di-n-butylphthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 20 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 20 2,4-Dinltrophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20 5 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 2,6-Dinltrotoluene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 bis(2-EthylheXyt)Phthalate 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Fluoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(b)Fiuoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(k)Fiuoranthene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Fluorene ---- 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5
Notes: -*'II units are ll1JIL. Sample Cuantilalion Umit (SOL) is l11e CRQl multiplied by l11e dilution factor and adjusted for percent moisture as a.pproprlate. The Qual column lndicatea the qualifief applied to the result following data validation <- below). "Result below lire Jaboralory P4ll..
NA- Not Applicable.
Qual SQL Result Qual u 5 <5 u u 5' <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u R 5 <5 R u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 20 <20 u u 20 <20 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u . u 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u u . 5 <5 u u 5 <5 u
Quallfiefs ................................................................................................................................................... . J - Elllmated (Semiquantitatiw) Data UJ -Not Detected/Estimated Data K- Bined High (Semlquantltative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data
• L - Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low B-~ in associated blanks (Semiquantltatiwl Data)
ACCESS\elown.mb1~port\ r.port_.
11111!1115 10:2!1:33 AM Golder Associates
R - Unusable Data Q - Not Applicable N - Tentative IdentifiCation (No Code) -Confirmed IdentifiCation
923-6053'
Sample Point RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual
' 5 <5· u 5 <5 u !
5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 '<5 u 5 <5 u '
5 <5 u 5. <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u
. 5 <5 u 5 <5 R 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <.5 u 5 <5 u
Page 1
l::a ::0 (,..,)
0 ---a (7)
c..v c::o
Jl!fl81995 SUMMARY OF CLP ORGANICS ANALYSES E.LIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RVFS
Resldeqtial Well Sample Results Semivolatlle Organics
Ma trix: Residential Wells Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point
FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21 Date 5ampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: .o4l25l95 Dilution Factor: 1.0 - Dilution Factor. 1.0 DIMion Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA
CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual
5 ~ 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5 5 Benzo(a)Pyrene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5
5 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5
20 2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol 20 <20 u 20 <20 UJ 20 <20
5 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol_ 5 <5 u 5 <5 UJ 5 <5
Noles: All units are IJIJI'L. Sample QuantHation Umil (sat.) is the CRQL mulllpl'ied by the dl'lution factor and adjusted for percent moisture as a,ppropriate. The Qual column Indicates the qualiflet' appl'ied to the result following da1a validation (see below).
u 5 u 5· u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 20 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 5 u 20 u 5
J - Esllmaled ~nlltatlwt) Data W -Not Detectedi'Eatlmated Data R- Unuuble Data K- Blaed High (SemiquantilatMI) Data u -Not DeteclediQuantilatlwt Data a- Not Applicable
<5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <20 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <5 u <20 u <5 u
l· BiMed Low (Semiquantitative) Data ut - Not DetectediBined Low N - T entati't'e Identification B. P--.tln auocJat.ed b1anb (SemiqiMntilltive Data) (No Code)· Confirmed ldenllfication
Golder
923-6053
Sample Poilnt I RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 DHutlon Factor: 1.0 ' I Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual,
5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 20 <20 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u 5 <5 u
Residential Well Sample Results Pesticide Organics
Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point FRES02 RES02 RES20 RES21
Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled; 4125195 Date Sampled: 4125195 DHution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA Percent Moisture: NA
CRQL Parameter SQL Result Qual SQL Result Qual SQL Result 0.01 Aldrin 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 • <0.010 O.o1 alpha-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 beta-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 delta-BHC 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.01 alpha-Chlordane 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 0.014 0.01 gamma-Chlordane 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 0.017 0.02 4,4'-DDD 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.02 4,4'-DDE 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.02 4,4'-DDT 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 0.20 Dieldrin 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 t:l 0.02 <0.020 0.01 -Endosulfan I O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 0.02 Endosulfan II 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02. 0.0022 J* 0.02 <0.020
0.02 Endosulfan Sulfate 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 0.0019 J* 0.02 0.0015 0.02 Endrin 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020
0.02 EndrinAidehyde 0.02 - <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020
0.02 Endrin Ketone 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020
0.01 Heptachlor 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u O.Q1 0.0014
0.01 Heptachlor Epoxlde 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 0.0099 0.10 Methoxychlor 0.10 <0.10 u 0.10 <0.10 u 0.10 <0.10 1.0 Toxaphene 1.0 <1.0 u. 1.0 <1.0 u 1.0 <1.0
Notes: All units are !J91l. Sample Quantitation Limit (SQL) is the CRQL multiplied by the dilution factor and adjusted fro percent moisture as appropriate. The Qual column Indicates ~ qual,ifl« applied lo the result following data validation (see below).
Qual SQL u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 u 0.01 J 0.01
O.Q1
u 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02. u 0.02 u 0.01 u 0.02 J* 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02 u 0.02 J* 0.01 J 0.01 u 0.10 u 1.0
J • Estimated {Semiquantitative) Data W • Not DetecledJE&timated Data R • Unusable Dala K. Biated High (Semiquantitative) Data U ·Not DetectlldiQuantitatlve Data Q • Not Applicable
L • Blued Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL ·Not Detected/Biased Low N ·Tentative IdentifiCation
Qual
u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u_
B • ~ In aaoclated blanks (Semiquantitative Data) (No Code) • Confinned Identification
ACCESS'Mown.mb11pest-report\ report.pat
ll/11W510:1g:58 AM Golder Associates
923-6053
Sample Point RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Percent Moisture: NA SQL Result Qual
0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u O.Q1 <0.010 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.02 <0.020 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.01 <0.010 u 0.10 .. <0.10 u 1.<!___ <1.0 U I
~1
:t» :::0 w 0--.......l 0" .a:::-0
June 1995
Matrix: Res,ldentlal Wellls
Sample POint FRES02
Date Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA
Parameter CRDL IDL Result Qual
Aluminum 200 19.2 606
Antimony 60 1.9 <1.9 u Arsenic 10 3.2 <3.2 u Barium 200 0.2 124
Beryllium 5 0.2 <0.20 u Cadmium 5 0.3 <0.30 u Calcium 5000 28.5 30300 Chromll!m 10 0.9 6.8
Cobalt 50 0.6 <0.60 u Copper 25 0.7 7.0
Iron 100 15.7 477
Lead 3 1.9 11.6 L
Magnesium 5000 4.0 7690
Manganese 15 0.3 17.9
Mercury 0.2 0.2 <0.20 u Nickel 40 1.4 2.3
Potassium 5000 16.7 1530
Selenium 5 4.4 <4.4 u Silver 10 0.5 <0.50 u Sodium 5000 202.0 8990
ThaJJ,Ium 10 4.5 <4.5 u Vanadium 50 0.4 1.2 B
Zinc 20 1.4 13.0
Cyanide 10 10.0 <10.0 u
Notes: Alii units are J.191L.
SUMMARY Of CLP TOTAL INORGANfCS ANALYSES
ELIZABETHTOWN LANDFILL RifFS
Realdentlal Well Sample Results
Sample Point Sample Point RES02 RES20
Date Sampled: 4125195 . Date Sampled: 4125195 D'ilution Factor: NA Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA Percent Solids: NA
CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result
200 19.2 619 200 19.2 103
60 1.9 <1.9 u 60 1.9 <1.9
10 3.2 <3.2 u 10 3.2 <3.2
200 0.2 129 . 200 0.2 435
5 0.2 <0.20 u 5 0.2 <0.20
5 0.3 <0.30 u 5 0.3 0.36
5000 28.5 30100 5000 28.5 78500
10 0.9 7.0 10 0.9 <0.90
50 0.6 <0.60 u 50 0.6 <0.00
25 0.7 8.9 25 0.7 38.8
100 15.7 465 100 15.7 497
3 1.9 12.1 L 3 1.9 5.4
5000 4.0 7580 5000 4.0 12500
15 0.3 17.3 15 0.3 94.7
0.2 0.2 <0.20 u 0.2 02 <0.20
40 1.4 2.7 40 1.4 <1.4
5000 16.7 1550 5000 16.7 1630.
5 4.4 <4.4 u 5 4.4 <4.4
10 0.5 <0.50 u 10 0.5 <0.50
5000 202.0 8980 . 5000 202.0 11800
10 4.5 <4.5 u 10 4.5 <4.5
50 0.4 1.0 B 50 0.4 0.86
20 1.4 19.6 20 1.4 348
10 10.0 <10.0 u 10 10.0 <10.0
Sample Quantitation Umlt (SQL) Is the Instrument Detection Umlt (IDL). The CRDLs and IDLs have been adjusted for dilution factors and percent solids as aPJXopriate .
QualifierS ................................................................................................................................................... . J: Estimated (SenWquantitative) Data UJ - Not Detected/Estimated Data R - Unusable Data
Qual
B
u u
u B
u u
L
u u
u u
u B
u
K- Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data · Q- Not Applicable L- Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/BiaMd Low N- Tentative ldentlflcation
923-6053
Sample Point RES21
D211e Sampled: 4125195 Dilution Factor: NA Percent Solids: NA
CRDL IDL Result Qual
200 19.2 92.2 B
60 1.9 <1.9 u 10 3.2 4.9
200 0.2 120
5 0.2 <0.20 u 5 0.3 <0.30 u
5000 28.5 15300
10 0.9 <0.90 u 50 0.6 0.72
25 0.7 <0.70 u 100 15.7 1490
3 1.9 <1.9 UL
5000 4.0 4370
15 0.3 635
0.2 0.2 <0.20 u 40 1.4 <1.4 u
5000 16.7 646
5 4.4 <4.4 u 10 0.5 <0.50 u
5000 202.0 38500 10 4.5 <4.5 u 50 0.4 <0.40 u 20 1.4 8.7
10 10.0 <10.0 u
B - Present In associated blmks (Serniquantitatl Data) (No Code)- Confirmed IdentifiCation
Auocfatls ,.. 1
et1~11:31:4111AM
l:ll :::0 (.A)
0 ......, (5'\
.r::-
Resklentlal Well sample Results Matrix: Residential Wells
sample Point Sample Point Sample Point Sample Point RES22
Date Sampled: 4125195 Date Sampled: Date sampled: Date Sampled: Dilution Factor: NA Dilution Factor: Dilution Factor: Dilution Factor: Percent Solids: NA Percent Solids: Percent Solids: Percent Solids:
Parameter CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result Qual CRDL IDL Result. Qual CRDL IDL Result Qual
Aluminum 200 19.2 82.9 B Antimony 60 1.9 <1.9 u Arsenic 10 3.2 <3.2 u Barium 200 0.2 80.4
BefYIIium 5 0.2 <0.20 u Cadmium 5 0.3 <0.30 u Calcium 5000 28.5 40900 Chromium 10 0.9 <0.90 u Cobalt 50 0.6 <0.60 u Copper 25 0.7 127
Iron 100 15.7 <15.7 u Lead 3 1.9 <1.9 UL
Magnesium 5000 4.0 8980
Manganese 15 0.3 1.1
Mercury 0.2 0.2 <0.20 u Nickel 40 1.4 <1.4 u Potassium 5000 16.7 1480
Selenium 5 4.4 <4.4 u Silver 10 0.5 <0.50 u Sodium 5000 202.0 10200
Thallium 10 4.5 <4.5 u Vanadium 50 0.4 0.60. B
. Zinc 20 1.4 11.8 . Cyanide 10 10.0 <10.0 u
--- --- --
Notes: All units are J.I!J{L. Sample Quantitation U,mit (SQL) Is the Instrument Detection Limit (IDL). The CRDLs and IDLs have been adjusted for dilution factors and percent solids as appropriate.
Qualifters .................................................................................................................................................. .. J • Estimated (Semiquantitative) Data UJ - Not Detected/Estimated Data R • Unusable Data K • Biased High (Semiquantitative) Data U -Not Detected/Quantitative Data Q • Not Applicable L- Biased Low (Semiquantitative) Data UL- Not Detected/Biased Low N ·Tentative Identification B • Present In associated blanks (Semiquantitative Data) (No Code) - Confirmed ldentlfiC8tion