Top Banner
Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop on the Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion: Interoperability of Information Systems of the Organizations Involved http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Workshop Jože Gričar eCenter Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of v Maribor [email protected] http://eCenter.FOV.Uni-Mb.si/Gricar, http://eLivingLab.org
17

Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

lynn-holman

Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop on the Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion: Interoperability of Information Systems of the Organizations Involved http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Workshop - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Relevance of Open Innovationto the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion

The 7th Workshop on the Cross-border Disaster eResponse in the eRegion:

Interoperability of Information Systems of the Organizations Involved

http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Workshop

Jože GričareCenter

Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of v [email protected]

http://eCenter.FOV.Uni-Mb.si/Gricar, http://eLivingLab.org

Page 2: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Cross-borderServices in the EU:

Procurement

Invoicing

Marketplaces

Government

Logistics

Health

Disaster Response

Learning

Inclusion

Parliament

Everything

Do we have a problem?Are there innovative opportunities?

Page 3: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Disaster eResponse Initiative

Draft Memorandum of Safe and Secure eRegion

http://eLivingLab.org/Safe/Memorandum.htm

Ljubljana, July 2005

Virtual Cross-border Disaster Response

Living Lab in the eRegion

http://eCenter.FOV.Uni-Mb.si/MerkurDay

November 2007

Workshops on Cross-border Disaster eResponse

in the eRegion 2004 - 2009

Page 4: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Cross-border Disaster e Response in the eRegion Stakeholders

• Caritas • Customs Administration• Emergency Ambulance Service• Fire Fighter Association• Insurance Association• Intelligence and Security Agency• Ministry of Defence & General Staff, Armed Forces• Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning• Ministry of Foreign Affairs• Ministry of Health• Ministry of Interior & Police• Ministry of Public Administration• Ministry of Transport• Protection and Rescue Administration• Radio and TV• Red Cross • Society for Emergency Medicine• Mobile services provider• University• University Medical Center

Page 5: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

eRegion

In the eRegion business & government

organizations, as well as individuals,

extensively use eTechnologies

in order to support their work

Page 6: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

eRegion - various perspectives

From a small business perspective, eRegion is an area

of about 100 kilometers around the company’s location.

From a large company’s perspective, eRegion is an area

of some 200-500 kilometers around the company’s location

From the Knowledge Village perspective, eRegion is the area

of about 5 hours air flight to/from Dubai, Arab Emirates.

.

Page 7: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

European transport corridors No. 5 & No. 10

Page 8: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop
Page 9: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Cross-border Baltic Region

Sweden is one of the strongest advocates for a special EU Baltic strategy, and I am pleased to tell you that the strategy is one of my government's top priorities in the discussions with France and the Czech Republic for our common presidency work programme.

Dr. Cecilia Malmström: The EU-strategy for the Baltic Sea Region under the Swedish Presidency.Baltic Sea Region Conference, Rostock 05 February 2009,http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/7972/a/120204

Page 10: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Open or Closed Philosophy/Concept/Attitudes/Values

C l o s e d

AuthoritarianTop DownCentral PlanningCommand & Control

BureaucraticRigidMonopolist

O p e n

Individual/FreedomBottom upParticipationCollaboration, Self

OrganizationCommon SenseFlexible/AdaptableCompetition -

Innovation

Page 11: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Innovation moving out of the Lab

Closed Innovation:Centralized inward looking innovation

Open Innovation:Externally focused, collaborative innovation

Innovation Networks:Ecosystem centric, cross-organizational innovation

Adopted from Richard Straub, IBM & Open Innovation Service Policy Group

Page 12: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

The Rise of the UserUser as “Research-Object”

Observation and Surveying

Prototype Development

Testing (Usability, Feasibility, Market Testing)

Piloting

User as Innovator

Interactive User Feed-back

Incremental User Innovation Ideas

User Idea Generation

User Community Innovation

Service by Definition “Co-creation”

Consumers >>> Contributors >>> Innovators

Adopted from Richard Straub, IBM & Open Innovation Service Policy Group

Industry R&D Led User & User Community Led

Page 13: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

A missing link in innovation

Innovation “no man’s

land”

Research push Market pull

Phase 1 Solution proposal

Phase 2 Prototype

Phase 3 Pre-commercial product/service

Phase 4 Commercial

product/service

Phase 0 Research

Presented by Veli-Pekka Niitamo, NOKIA & ENoLL, Bled eConference June 5, 2007

Page 14: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Cross-bordereServices in the EU:

eProcurement

eInvoicing

eMarketplaces

eGovernment

eLogistics

eHealth

Disaster eResponse

eLearning

eInclusion

eParliament

eEverything There are interoperability problems !In the eEU, innovative eServices are needed

Page 15: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

The Helsinki Manifesto “We have to move fast, before it is too late”http://eLivingLab.org/files/Helsinki_Manifesto_201106.pdfNovember 20, 2006

Implementation of European Network of Living Labs - ENoLLThe required measure No. 1

Page 16: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

The Helsinki Manifesto Twelve most supported measures

1. Implementation of a European Network of Living Labs2. Reap the benefits of re-using bank infrastructure for the e-invoicing 3. Break down internal boarders for ICT services 4. Renewing of the European innovation system5. Creation of a market for innovative products and services 6. Focus on services innovation, and establish services science, management and engineering as an academic discipline 7. Concrete funding and support for technology start-ups8. Ensure data integration between IT-solutions 9. Intensify integration of retail banking market (Payments Services Directive) 10. Implementation of European wide compatible e-invoicing system 11. Move from an organization-centered system to a citizen-centered system12. Bring people actively to the information society (ICT skills to 10 million adult people in Europe over a 3-year period).

Page 17: Relevance of Open Innovation to the Disaster eResponse in the eRegion The 7th Workshop

Opportunities in Open Innovation Experience Sharing in the eRegions

Which components, solutions, or operations successful in one eRegion could be copied, which could be followed, and which are not applicable at all in another eRegion?

Can some guidelines for successful copying be defined and generalized for better understanding of the potential of the open innovation as a concept and as a practice in an eRegion?

How relevant are the outstanding business, government, and academic leaders to the eRegions awareness creation, policy making, or solutions implementation?

Can the neighboring countries facing tensions or conflicts gain benefits if helped in, or pushed into an eRegion development and innovative experimenting in the LLs?