Top Banner

of 71

Relative Resource Manager 1

Apr 03, 2018

Download

Documents

apples05
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    1/71

    Operations

    Management5230Session 3

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    2/71

    Before everything else,

    getting ready is the secretof success.

    Henry Ford

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    3/71

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    4/71

    News You Can Use Schedule

    Class Date: At Start of Class Before Break After Break End of Class

    Feb 5 Jane Girard Patricia Vondrak Marta Aranda Brad Gronke

    Feb 12 Tushar Agarwal Nilesh Patel Christine Weber Wil Benjamin

    Feb 19 Mary Fetting Alana Bogart Lori Davis Larry Schwartz

    Feb 26 Martha Hunt Hilda Newborn Karina Formento Sharon Shlimoun

    Mar 5 Thomas Mozny Michael Duggan Rachel Vincent Patience Gallegos

    Mar 12 Christine Walker Zi Zhuan Wu Johnny Vincent Janelle Zervan

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    5/71

    News You Can Use

    Jane Girard

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    6/71

    Previously

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    7/71

    Strategies forOperational Competitive Advantage

    1. Differentiation

    2. Cost leadership

    3. Responsive

    Name them

    Everything that impacts customers

    perception of value

    Provide the maximum value as perceivedby customer

    Flexibility // Reliability //Timeliness

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    8/71

    Finance

    CompanyStrategy

    HR / JDLocationLayout

    CA

    Process

    Capacity

    DesignG // S

    QualityMaint -

    Reliability

    Marketing

    SCM

    Inventory

    Scheduling

    SO

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    9/71

    Process Strategies Are?

    1. Process Focus

    2. Repetitive Focus

    3. Product Focus

    4. Mass Customization

    StrategySelection

    Based on

    Volume

    &Variety

    Which relate to

    What you do & Strategy Selected

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    10/71

    Tools for Process Design

    Flow Diagrams

    Time-Function/Process Mapping

    Work Flow Diagrams

    Process Charts Work Flow Analysis

    Value Stream Mapping -- VSM

    Service Blue Printing w/ Poke-Yokes

    Pp 266 269

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    11/71

    Value-Stream Mapping

    Figure 7.8

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    12/71

    Process Chart

    Figure 7.9

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    13/71

    Aggregate Planning

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    14/71

    Operations Management & PlanningSuccess Over a Time Horizon

    Optimize capacity--Modify or

    Medi-

    range

    3

    3

    0mon

    Short-

    Range

    1wkto3m

    on

    Long-

    Range

    12+//

    244

    8mon

    Add facilitiesAdd long lead time equipment /

    components

    Optimally Use capacity

    Key Planning

    Driver

    ModelingStatisticalmulti-variant &other

    Market

    Integrated

    DemandForecastingVolume &Resource

    Agency Add FTEs Add ShiftsEquip --Spare Rent Subcontract

    *Limited options existTimeFrame

    Schedule servicesSchedule personnel

    Registry

    Allocate Facilities~ EquipmentWork Center LoadingWork sequencingOrdering Supplies

    Time

    PlanningObjectives

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    15/71

    The Planning Process

    Figure 13.1

    Long-range plans(over one year)Research and DevelopmentNew product plansCapital investmentsFacility location/expansion

    Intermediate-range plans

    (3 to 18 months)Sales planningProduction planning and budgetingSetting employment, inventory,

    subcontracting levelsAnalyzing operating plans

    Short-range plans

    (up to 3 months)Job assignmentsOrderingJob schedulingDispatchingOvertimePart-time help

    Topexecutives

    Operationsmanagers

    Operations managers,supervisors, foremen

    Responsibility Planning tasks and horizon

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    16/71

    Aggregate

    Planning

    Figure 13.2

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    17/71

    Aggregate Planning

    Objective is to minimize cost over theplanning period by adjusting

    Production rates

    Labor levels

    Inventory levels

    Overtime work

    Subcontracting rates

    Other controllable variables

    Determine the quantity and timing ofproduction for the immediate future

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    18/71

    Aggregate Planning Strategies

    Cap

    acity

    1. Use inventories to absorb changes in demand

    2. Accommodate changes by varying workforcesize

    3. Use part-timers, overtime, or idle time to absorbchanges

    4. Use subcontractors and maintain a stableworkforce

    5. Change prices or other factors to influencedemand

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    19/71

    Aggregate Planning Options

    Table 13.1

    Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

    Changinginventorylevels

    Changes inhumanresources aregradual or

    none; no abruptproductionchanges.

    Inventoryholding costmay increase.Shortages may

    result in lostsales.

    Applies mainly toproduction, notservice,operations.

    Varyingworkforce

    size byhiring orlayoffs

    Avoids the costsof other

    alternatives.

    Hiring, layoff,and training

    costs may besignificant.

    Used where sizeof labor pool is

    large.

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    20/71

    Aggregate Planning Options

    Table 13.1

    Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

    Varyingproductionratesthrough

    overtime oridle time

    Matchesseasonalfluctuationswithout hiring/

    training costs.

    Overtimepremiums; tiredworkers; maynot meet

    demand.

    Allows flexibilitywithin theaggregate plan.

    Sub-contracting

    Permitsflexibility andsmoothing of

    the firmsoutput.

    Loss of qualitycontrol;reduced profits;

    loss of futurebusiness.

    Applies mainly inproductionsettings.

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    21/71

    Aggregate Planning Options

    Table 13.1

    Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

    Using part-timeworkers

    Is less costlyand moreflexible thanfull-time

    workers.

    High turnover/training costs;quality suffers;scheduling

    difficult.

    Good forunskilled jobs inareas with largetemporary labor

    pools.

    Influencingdemand

    Tries to useexcesscapacity.Discounts draw

    new customers.

    Uncertainty indemand. Hardto matchdemand to

    supply exactly.

    Createsmarketingideas.Overbooking

    used in somebusinesses.

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    22/71

    Aggregate Planning Options

    Table 13.1

    Option Advantages Disadvantages Some Comments

    Backorderingduringhigh-

    demandperiods

    May avoidovertime.Keeps capacityconstant.

    Customer mustbe willing towait, butgoodwill is lost.

    Many companiesback order.

    Counter-seasonalproduct

    and servicemixing

    Fully utilizesresources;allows stable

    workforce.

    May requireskills orequipment

    outside thefirms areas of

    expertise.

    Risky findingproducts orservices with

    oppositedemandpatterns.

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    23/71

    Methods for Aggregate Planning

    A mixed strategy may be the best wayto achieve minimum costs

    There are many possible mixedstrategies

    Finding the optimal plan is not alwayspossible

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    24/71

    Mixing Options to Develop a Plan

    Chase strategy Match output rates to demand forecast for each period

    Vary workforce levels or vary production rate

    Favored by many service organizations

    Level strategy Daily production is uniform

    Use inventory or idle time as buffer

    Stable production leads to better quality and productivity

    Some combination of capacity options, amixed strategy, might be the best solution

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    25/71

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    26/71

    Law Firm Example

    Table 13.9

    Labor-Hours Required Capacity Constraints

    (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)(1) Forecasts Maximum Number of

    Category of Best Likely Worst Demand in QualifiedLegal Business (hours) (hours) (hours) People Personnel

    Trial work 1,800 1,500 1,200 3.6 4

    Legal research 4,500 4,000 3,500 9.0 32

    Corporate law 8,000 7,000 6,500 16.0 15

    Real estate law 1,700 1,500 1,300 3.4 6

    Criminal law 3,500 3,000 2,500 7.0 12

    Total hours 19,500 17,000 15,000Lawyers needed 39 34 30

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    27/71

    Yield Management

    Allocating resources to customers atprices that will maximize yield or revenue

    1. Service or product can be sold in

    advance of consumption2. Demand fluctuates

    3. Capacity is relatively fixed

    4. Demand can be segmented5. Variable costs are low and fixed costs

    are high

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    28/71

    DemandCurve

    Yield Management Example

    Figure 13.5

    Passed-upcontribution

    Money lefton the table

    Potential customers exist who arewilling to pay more than the $15variable cost of the room

    Some customers who paid$150 were actually willing topay more for the roomTotal

    $ contribution= (Price) x (50

    rooms)= ($150 - $15)x (50)

    = $6,750

    Price

    Room sales

    100

    50

    $150Price charged

    for room

    $15Variable cost

    of room

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    29/71

    Total $ contribution =(1st price) x 30 rooms + (2nd price) x 30 rooms =

    ($100 - $15) x 30 + ($200 - $15) x 30 =$2,550 + $5,550 = $8,100

    DemandCurve

    Yield Management Example

    Figure 13.6

    Price

    Room sales

    100

    60

    30

    $100Price 1

    for room

    $200Price 2

    for room

    $15Variable cost

    of room

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    30/71

    Yield Management Matrix

    D

    urationofuse

    Unpredicta

    ble

    Predic

    table

    Price

    Tend to be fixed Tend to be variable

    Quadrant 1: Quadrant 2:

    Movies Hotels

    Stadiums/arenas AirlinesConvention centers Rental carsHotel meeting space Cruise lines

    Quadrant 3: Quadrant 4:

    Restaurants Continuing careGolf courses hospitals

    Internet serviceproviders

    Figure 13.7

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    31/71

    Making Yield Management Work

    1. Multiple pricing structures must befeasible and appear logical to thecustomer

    2. Forecasts of the use and duration ofuse

    3. Changes in demand

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    32/71

    H

    HH

    C

    ost

    Optimize

    How to Go in the Three Required Directionsat Once?

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    33/71

    FoldRiteTeam 3 Team Bud

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    34/71

    News You Can Use

    Patricia Vondrak

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    35/71

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    36/71

    News You Can Use

    Marta Aranda

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    37/71

    Location Strategies

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    38/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Location Strategy

    One of the most important decisions afirm makes

    Increasingly global in nature

    Significant impact on fixed andvariable costs

    Decisions made relatively infrequently The objective is to maximize the

    benefit of location to the firm

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    39/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Location Decisions

    Country Decision Key Success Factors1. Political risks, government rules,

    attitudes, incentives

    2. Cultural and economic issues

    3. Location of markets

    4. Labor talent, attitudes, productivity,costs

    5. Availability of supplies,communications, energy

    6. Exchange rates and currency risks

    Figure 8.1

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    40/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Location Decisions

    Region/CommunityDecision

    Key Success Factors1. Corporate desires

    2. Attractiveness of region

    3. Labor availability and costs

    4. Costs and availability of utilities

    5. Environmental regulations

    6. Government incentives and fiscal policies

    7. Proximity to raw materials and customers

    8. Land/construction costs

    MNWI

    MI

    IL INOH

    Figure 8.1

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    41/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Location Decisions

    Site Decision Key Success Factors1. Site size and cost

    2. Air, rail, highway, and waterwaysystems

    3. Zoning restrictions

    4. Proximity of services/ suppliesneeded

    5. Environmental impact issues

    Figure 8.1

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    42/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Global Competitiveness Indexof Countries

    Country 2009 Rank 2005 Rank

    Switzerland 1 4USA 2 1Japan 8 10Canada 9 13

    UK 13 9Israel 27 23China 29 48Italy 48 38India 49 22Mexico 60 59

    Russia 63 53

    Table 8.1

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    43/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    2011 Pearson Education

    Ranking CorruptionRank Country 2011 CPI Score (out of 10)

    1 New Zealand 9.52 Demark, Finland 9.45 Singapore 9.26 Norway 9.08 Australia, Switzerland 8.8

    10 Canada 8.712 Hong Kong 8.414 Germany, Japan 8.016 UK 7.824 USA 7.1

    32 Taiwan 6.143 South Korea 5.460 Malaysia 4.375 China 3.6112 Vietnam 2.9

    143 Russia 2.4

    LeastCorrupt

    MostCorrupt

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    44/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Clustering of Companies

    Industry Locations Reason for clustering

    Theme parks(Disney World,UniversalStudios)

    Orlando, Florida A hot spot forentertainment, warmweather, tourists, andinexpensive labor

    Electronicsfirms

    Northern Mexico NAFTA, duty freeexport to US

    Computer

    hardwaremanufacturers

    Singapore, Taiwan High technological

    penetration rate andper capita GDP,skilled/educatedworkforce with largepool of engineers

    Table 8.3

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    45/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Locational Break-Even AnalysisExample

    $180,000

    $160,000 $150,000

    $130,000

    $110,000

    $80,000

    $60,000

    $30,000

    $10,000

    Annualcost

    | | | | | | |

    0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

    Volume

    Akronlowestcost

    Bowling Greenlowest cost

    Chicagolowestcost

    Figure 8.2

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    46/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Center-of-Gravity Method

    Finds location of distributioncenter that minimizes distributioncosts

    Considers

    Location of markets

    Volume of goods shipped to thosemarkets

    Shipping cost (or distance)

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    47/71

    2011 PearsonEducation, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Center-of-Gravity MethodNorth-South

    East-West

    120

    90

    60

    30

    | | | | | |

    30 60 90 120 150Arbitraryorigin

    Chicago (30, 120)New York (130, 130)

    Pittsburgh (90, 110)

    Atlanta (60, 40)

    Center of gravity (66.7, 93.3)+

    Figure 8.3

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    48/71

    2011 Pearson

    Education, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Transportation Model

    Finds amount to be shipped fromseveral points of supply to severalpoints of demand

    Solution will minimize totalproduction and shipping costs

    A special class of linearprogramming problems

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    49/71

    2011 Pearson

    Education, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Worldwide Distribution of

    Volkswagens and Parts

    Figure 8.4

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    50/71

    2011 Pearson

    Education, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Service Location Strategy

    1. Purchasing power of customer-drawing area2. Service and image compatibility with

    demographics of the customer-drawing area

    3. Competition in the area

    4. Quality of the competition

    5. Uniqueness of the firms and competitorslocations

    6. Physical qualities of facilities and

    neighboring businesses

    7. Operating policies of the firm

    8. Quality of management

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    51/71

    2011 Pearson

    Education, Inc.publishing as Prentice

    Geographic InformationSystems (GIS)

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    52/71

    Capacity Simulation

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    53/71

    Modify capacity Use capacity

    Planning Over a Time Horizon

    Intermediate-rangeplanning

    Subcontract Add personnelAdd equipment Build or use inventoryAdd shifts

    Short-rangeplanning

    Schedule jobsSchedule personnel

    Allocate machinery

    *

    Long-rangeplanning

    Add facilitiesAdd long lead time equipment /components *

    * Limited options exist

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    54/71

    6

    Scheduling Objectives

    1. Meet due dates / commitments

    2. Minimize lead time

    3. Minimize setup time or cost

    4. Minimize work-in-process inventory

    5. Maximize machine utilization

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    55/71

    1. What is your teams ops posture

    2. What actions your team took to manage / control the factory

    3. Why your team took the actions above

    4. Show analysis to justify conclusions

    5. Identify key operational management themes (correlate to

    material in text and present)

    6. Identify & explain key lessons learned from the simulations

    7. What course objective does this assignment relate to & why

    Littlefield Capacity Management Simulation Presentation

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    56/71

    As of noon todayDay = 143

    (Tuesday 5J an)

    Total = 268 Days

    (125 to go!)

    75 more days(hours) ofInteraction

    Followed by 50hour run

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    57/71

    Maintenance & Reliability

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    58/71

    Strategic Importance of

    Maintenance and ReliabilityFailure has far reaching effects on a

    firms

    Dissatisfied customers Reputation

    Operation

    Profitability

    Idle employees

    Profits becominglosses

    Reduced value ofinvestment in

    plant andequipment

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    59/71

    Maintenance and Reliability

    The objective of maintenance and reliability isto maintain the capability of the system whilecontrolling costs

    Maintenance is all activities involved inkeeping a systems equipment inworking order

    Reliability is the probability that amachine will function properly for aspecified time

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    60/71

    Maintenance Strategy

    Employee Involvement

    Information sharingSkill trainingReward systemEmployee empowerment

    Maintenance and ReliabilityProcedures

    Clean and lubricateMonitor and adjustMake minor repairKeep computerized records

    Results

    Reduced inventoryImproved qualityImproved capacityReputation for qualityContinuous improvementReduced variability

    Figure 17.1

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    61/71

    Reliability

    Improving individual components

    Rs = R1 x R2 x R3x x Rn

    where R1 = reliability of component 1

    R2 = reliability of component 2and so on

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    62/71

    Overall System Reliability

    Relia

    bilityofthesystem(

    percent)

    Average reliability of each component (percent)

    | | | | | | | | |

    100 99 98 97 96

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0

    Figure 17.2

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    63/71

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    64/71

    Providing Redundancy

    Provide backup components to increase reliability

    + xProbability offirstcomponent

    working

    Probability ofneedingsecond

    component

    Probabilityof second

    componentworking

    (.8) + (.8) x (1 - .8)

    = .8 + .16 = .96

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    65/71

    Maintenance

    Two types of maintenance Preventive maintenance routine inspection and servicing to keep

    facilities in good repair

    Breakdown maintenance emergency or priority repairs on failedequipment

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    66/71

    Maintenance Costs

    Figure 17.4 (a)

    Traditional View

    Totalcosts

    Breakdownmaintenance costs

    Costs

    Maintenance commitment

    Preventivemaintenance costs

    Optimal point (lowestcost maintenance policy)

    Typically this approachfailed to consider the truetotal cost of breakdowns

    Inventory

    Employee morale

    Scheduleunreliability

    M i t C t

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    67/71

    Maintenance Costs

    Figure 17.4 (b)

    Full Cost View

    Costs

    Maintenance commitment

    Optimal point (lowestcost maintenance policy)

    Totalcosts

    Full BreakdownCost

    Preventivemaintenance costs

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    68/71

    News You Can Use

    Brad Gronke

    The Goal E ec ti e E al ation Pape

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    69/71

    The Goal Executive Evaluation Paper

    AssignmentPrepare an executive brief of what transpired in The Goal as the basis fordemonstrating your work and general understanding of materials considered duringthe segment. The assignment will be evaluated on your presentation related to thefollowing elements, each of which should be focused on with equal emphasis:

    Identify examples of Ten OM Decisions in The Goal. (describe and elaborate onthe examples and the impact on the companys performance)

    Evaluation of essential operational decisions / strategies / principles exercisedin the The Goal

    Key lessons learned from The Goal

    Paper Format:is to be submitted by the start of session four. Do not include a cover sheet or

    presentation folder. Use a header at the top of the paper to include student nameand date. Paper should have reasonable margin and font.

    is limited to maximum 3 pages.(papers that exceed 3 pages will not be graded)

    The Goal Executive Evaluation Paper

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    70/71

    The Goal Executive Evaluation PaperGuidelines & Considerations

    Start with a Thesis {Avoid "In this paper I will"}; Make your point(s) leveraging theconcepts with evidence to support your assertions and Provide a conclusion.Writing should clearly use and reflect Ops Mgt - language, terms, concepts,theories, etc.

    Include organizational elements to enhance flow / concise presentation - usebullets, section breaks paragraphs, section breaks, headings, attachments and

    other organizational elements in a manner that leads the reader through the work aclear linkage is made between each section.

    All papers are to be written in accordance with the LFGSM writing guidelinescriteria, and to conform to an expected level of excellence for graduate level work.Spelling, grammar and structural errors will subtract from the overall grade level.

    Rubric: Total Value 15 points

    Identification of 10 DOMs in The Goal: 5 pointsConnection to course materials, critical thinking, connection to operationsdecisions: 4 pointsKey Learnings: 4 points

    Paper structure (organization, thesis, grammar, punctuation) : 2 points

  • 7/29/2019 Relative Resource Manager 1

    71/71

    Next Week (week 4)

    News You Can Use X4

    Review Session 3

    Supply Chain Management Discussion

    Outsourcing as a Supply Chain Strategy

    Littlefield Simulation Presentation Preparation

    The Goal paper is Due!