Top Banner
100

Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Oct 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 2: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

The structure is three dimensional (3D),

comprising floor slabs, beams, columns and

footings, which monolithically connected and

act integrally to resist vertical loads and lateral

loads.

3D view of reinforced concrete building structure

Page 3: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Idealized as 3D frame which consist of slabs, beams and column.

In many cases the slabs are analyzed separately (analyses frame consist only beams and columns)

3D frame of building structure

Page 4: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Analysis of 3D frame represent the real behavior

of the structure but it is quite complicated since

the structure is highly indeterminate

The analysis normally carried out by computer

since the manual calculation is unfeasible

Page 5: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

In order to simplify the analysis, the 3D structure

is generally divided into a series of independent

parallel two dimensional plane frames (2D).

2D frame of building

structure

Simplified frame into substitude frames (sub-

frame) or continuous beams

Page 6: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Braced Frame ◦ Frames that not contribute to

the overall stability of the

structure

◦ None of the lateral actions,

including wind, are transmitted

to the columns and beams but

carries by bracing members

such as shear wall

◦ Support vertical actions only

Page 7: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Unbraced Frame

◦ Frame that not contribute to

the overall stability of the

structure

◦ All lateral actions, including

wind, are transmitted to the

columns and beams since

there are no bracing

members such as shear wall

are provided.

◦ Support vertical and lateral

actions

Page 8: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Primary objective - to obtain a set of internal

forces and moments throughout the structure

that are in equilibrium with the design loads for

the required loading combinations.

General provisions to analysis are set out in EN

1992-1-1 section 5.

Page 9: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

One-level sub-frame ◦ Each sub-frame mat be taken to consist of the beams at one level

together with the columns above and below.

◦ The ends of the columns remote from the beams may generally

be assumed to be fixed unless the assumption of a pinned end is

clearly more reasonable

Sub-frame for analysis of beams and columns

Page 10: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Two-points sub-frame ◦ The moments and forces in certain individual beam may be found

by considering a simplified sub-frame consisting only of the beam,

the columns attached to the end of that beam and the beams on

either side is any.

◦ The column and beam ends remote from the beam under

consideration may generally be assumed to be fixed unless the

assumption of pinned is clearly more reasonable

Sub-frame for analysis of individual beam

Page 11: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

The stiffness of the beams on either side of the beam considered should be taken as half their actual values if they are taken to be fixed at their outer ends

Page 12: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Continuous beam and one-point sub-frame

◦ The moments and forces in the beams at one level may also be obtained by considering the beams as a continuous beam over supports providing no restraint to rotation

Continuous beam for analysis of beams

One-point sub-frames for analysis of columns

Page 13: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

The ultimate moments for column may be calculated by simple moment distribution procedure

assumption that the column and beam ends remote from the junction under consideration are fixed and that the beams posses half their actual stiffness

The arrangement of the design ultimate variable loads should be such as to cause the maximum moment the column

Page 14: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Action on buildings is due to permanent (dead load),

variable (imposed, wind, dynamic, seismic loads)

and accidential load

Mostly multistiry buildings for office or residential

purpose are design for dead, imposed and wind

loads

Separate actions must be applied to the structure in

appropiate directions and various tyoes of actions

combined with partial safety factors selscted to

cause the most severe design condition.

Page 15: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

The framing plans for a

multistory building are shown

in Fig E9.1. The main

dimensions structural features,

loads, material, etc. are also

set out in the figure. Analyze

sub frame 3/A-D, Level 1 to

determine shear forces and

bending moments of

corresponding beams and

columns. Use all the three

methods of analysis that

discussed before

Page 16: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 17: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 18: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 19: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 20: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 21: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 22: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 23: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 24: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 25: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 26: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 27: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 28: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 29: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 30: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 31: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 32: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 33: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 34: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 35: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 36: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 37: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 38: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 39: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 40: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 41: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 42: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 43: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 44: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 45: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 46: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 47: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 48: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 49: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 50: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 51: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 52: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 53: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 54: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 55: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 56: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 57: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 58: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 59: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 60: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 61: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 62: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 63: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 64: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 65: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 66: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 67: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Building frames are subjected to lateral loads as

well as vertical loads.

Building must not only have sufficient lateral

resistance to prevent failure but also must have

sufficient resistance to deflection to prevent

damage to their various part.

Page 68: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Portal method ◦ The frame theoretically divided into independent portals.

◦ The shear in each storey is assumed to be divided between the

bays in proportion to their span.

◦ Shear in each bay is then divided equally between columns.

◦ The column end moments are the column shear multiplied by

one-half the column height

◦ Beam moment balance the column moments

◦ The external column only resist axial load which is found by

dividing the overturning moment at any level by the width of the

building

Page 69: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Cantilever method

◦ The axial loads in column are assumed to be

proportional to the distance from the center of

gravity of the frame

◦ Assume that all the column in a storey are of

equal cross-section area and the point of

contraflexures are located at the mid-points of

all column and beams.

Page 70: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Wind forces- variable loads which act directly on

the internal and external surfaces of structures.

The intensity is related to the square of the wind

velocity and the dimension of the members that are

resisting the wind.

Wind velocity-dependent on geographical location,

the height of the structure, the topography of the

area and the roughness of the surrounding terrain.

Page 71: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

The response of a structure to the variable

action of wind can be separated into two

components

Background component ◦ Involves static deflection of the structure under the wind pressure

Resonant component ◦ involves dynamic vibration of the structure in response to

changes in wind pressure

Page 72: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Wind

◦ creates pressure on the windwards side of a building

and suction on its other three sides

◦ Produces suction on flat roofs, on the leeward side of

sloping roofs, and even on the windwards side of roofs

with a pitch less than 30°

Page 73: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Simplified procedure ◦ Limited in application to building of rectangular in

plan and not greater than 15.0 m high

Page 74: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Analytical procedure

◦ Limited to regular building that are not more

than 200m high and structure with roof span

less than 100 m

Page 75: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis

Wind tunnel procedure

◦ Used for complex buildings

Page 76: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 77: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 78: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 79: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 80: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 81: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 82: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 83: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 84: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 85: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 86: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 87: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 88: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 89: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 90: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 91: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 92: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 93: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 94: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 95: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 96: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 97: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 98: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 99: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis
Page 100: Reinforced Concrete Design 2: Frame Analysis