1 | Page | INTERNSHIP REPORT | RCC BOX FOR A ROAD UNDER BRIDGE A. INTRODUCTION It is well known that railway tracks have to cross through the roads in and around highly populated, well-built cities and towns so a level crossing is provided in those points but these level crossings may be manned or unmanned, and further causes a traffic jam when a train has to pass by. As both population and traffic are increasing day by day delays and the risk of accidents at the level crossings are also increasing, on Indian Railways. About 30% of consequential train accidents were at level crossings, in terms of causalities it contributes 60%. So Indian Railways has decided to go for road over bridges (ROB’s) and road under bridges (RUB’s) where ever necessary in populated cities. As the cities are well built the land acquisition for construction of ROB is difficult and sometimes not possible, so under such cases engineers go for RUB’s. Sometimes the railway lines or the roads are constructed in embankment which comes in the way of natural flow of storm water (from existing drainage channels) or city sewages, as such flow cannot be obstructed and some kind of cross drainage works are required to be provided to allow water to pass across the embankment. Culverts are provided to accomplish such flow across the rail lines and roadways; small and major bridges depending on their span which in turn depends on the discharge, if span is small engineers go for box or slab bridges. To construct RUB’s with minimum disruption to train services and road traffic is a challenge to the Engineers. Methods adopted for construction of these structures are 1. Cut and cover method 2. Box pushing method 3. Restricted Height Girder method Box pushing technique is most widely used because of its numerous advantages over the other conventional method i.e. cut and cover method, box pushing technique is safer to construct in a busy junction of rail and road over conventional method. In Box pushing technique, R.C.C. boxes in segments are cast outside and pushed through the heavy embankments of Rail or Road by Jacking. The required thrust is generated through thrust bed, as well as line and level of precast boxes is also controlled. This underpass RCC Bridge is pushed into embankment by means of hydraulic equipment which is detailed explained in this report, since the availability of land in the city is less, such type of bridge utilizes less space for its construction. Hence constructing Underpass Bridge is a better option where there is a constraint of space or Land. In this report a detailed explanation of a RCC Box RUB construction project through an embankment of a rail line located in Mettuguda, Secunderabad.
49
Embed
Reinforced concrete box road under bridge design and construction
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
RCC BOX FOR A ROAD UNDER BRIDGE
A. INTRODUCTION
It is well known that railway tracks have to cross through the roads in and around highly
populated, well-built cities and towns so a level crossing is provided in those points but these
level crossings may be manned or unmanned, and further causes a traffic jam when a train has
to pass by. As both population and traffic are increasing day by day delays and the risk of
accidents at the level crossings are also increasing, on Indian Railways. About 30% of
consequential train accidents were at level crossings, in terms of causalities it contributes 60%.
So Indian Railways has decided to go for road over bridges (ROB’s) and road under bridges
(RUB’s) where ever necessary in populated cities. As the cities are well built the land acquisition
for construction of ROB is difficult and sometimes not possible, so under such cases engineers
go for RUB’s.
Sometimes the railway lines or the roads are constructed in embankment which comes in the
way of natural flow of storm water (from existing drainage channels) or city sewages, as such
flow cannot be obstructed and some kind of cross drainage works are required to be provided
to allow water to pass across the embankment. Culverts are provided to accomplish such flow
across the rail lines and roadways; small and major bridges depending on their span which in
turn depends on the discharge, if span is small engineers go for box or slab bridges. To construct
RUB’s with minimum disruption to train services and road traffic is a challenge to the Engineers.
Methods adopted for construction of these structures are
1. Cut and cover method
2. Box pushing method
3. Restricted Height Girder method
Box pushing technique is most widely used because of its numerous advantages over the other
conventional method i.e. cut and cover method, box pushing technique is safer to construct in a
busy junction of rail and road over conventional method. In Box pushing technique, R.C.C. boxes
in segments are cast outside and pushed through the heavy embankments of Rail or Road by
Jacking. The required thrust is generated through thrust bed, as well as line and level of precast
boxes is also controlled. This underpass RCC Bridge is pushed into embankment by means of
hydraulic equipment which is detailed explained in this report, since the availability
of land in the city is less, such type of bridge utilizes less space for its construction. Hence
constructing Underpass Bridge is a better option where there is a constraint of space or
Land.
In this report a detailed explanation of a RCC Box RUB construction project through an
embankment of a rail line located in Mettuguda, Secunderabad.
2 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
B. DETAILED REPORT
In this report a detailed explanation of a RCC Box RUB construction project under a railway
embankment in Mettuguda (Secundrabad, India) is given. This report is divided into following
parts
Site selection and description
Design
Construction and Execution
Time and progress of work
Safety and precautionary measures
Advantages and Limitations
References
3 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
1. SITE SELECTION AND DESCRIPTION
Secundrabad (Hyderabad, India) is a highly populated, well-built city. It is the capital of state of
Telangana, headquarters for many government organizations, MNCs, industries and many other
businesses, so it is a center of attraction for a large work force. So there is a prevailing need of
an efficient road system. Secunderabad is also headquarters of south central railways, so
Secundrabad railway station is busiest station in this region. So a need for RUB’s and ROB’s for
all its level crossings is must.
The site chosen for this RUB construction had a long pending need of rail crossing as road
width extension was being carried by state government to accommodate the increasing traffic
volume. Construction of ROB is highly impractical as land acquisition is difficult and ROB is too
costly. Also there is also an active metro rail project under construction in that place and as the
current rail line is on elevated portion engineers chose to go for a road under bridge (RUB)
construction using box pushing technique which causes minimum disruption to train services
and road traffic
As you can see in this satellite image of construction site below, how well built is the area
around the location of the project is, so the construction of a RUB was must. Executive Engineer
stated that there was a lot demand from political side and the local authorities & public.
Satellite image of RUB construction site connecting Boiguda-Mettuguda in Secundrabad, courtesy google maps
4 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
Satellite map of RUB construction site connecting Boiguda-Mettuguda in Secundrabad, courtesy google maps
5 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
2. DESIGN OF THE RCC BOX
Design data
Size of the box 10.5 m X 5.15 m
Length of the box 24 m
Thickness of top slab 0.9 m
Thickness of bottom slab 0.9 m
Thickness of end vertical walls 0.9 m
R.L of Rail level 100.1 m
R.L of formation level 99.39 m
R.L of invert level 92.33 m
Grade of concrete M40
Grade of steel Fe415
Clear cover to reinforcement 50 mm
Density of soil 1.9 T/m3
Angle of internal friction 30o
Unit weight of ballast 19.2 T/m3
Assumptions
1. Density of concrete = 2.5 T/cubic meter
2. Density of Soil = 1.9 T/cubic meter
3. Loading standard = 25T - 2008 LOAD As per (Indian rail code standards)
6 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF R.C.C BOX
Loads acting
Structural loads or actions are forces, deformations or accelerations applied to a structure or its
components. Loads cause stresses deformations and displacements in structures. Assessment of
their effects is carried out by the methods of structural analysis. Excess load or overloading may
cause structural failure, and hence such possibility should be either considered in the design or
strictly controlled.
The total loads acting on the box are determined and the resulting bending moments, shear
forces and axial forces acting on the box are calculated for each combination of loads and then it is
designed for the most adverse combination of loads.
The loads considered are
1. Dead loads
2. Live loads
3. Dynamic effects
4. Longitudinal force
5. Earth pressure
6. Surcharge pressure
7 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
DEAD LOADS
Dead loads are those that are constant in magnitude and fixed in location throughout the lifetime
of the structure. Usually the major part of the dead load is the self-weight of the structure. The
dead load can be calculated accurately from the design configuration, dimension of the structure
and density of the material, rail load, sleeper load, ballast load. The load due to weight of earth
above box (earth cushion) also contributes to dead weight it is called cushion load.
2.3.2.1. The live load due to pedestrian traffic shall be treated as uniformly distributed over the
footway. For the design of footbridges or footpaths on railway bridges the live load including
dynamic effects shall be taken as 4.8 kPa (490 kg/m2) of the footpath area. For the design of foot-
path on a road bridge or road rail bridge, the live load including dynamic effects may be taken as
4.07 kPa (415 kg/m2) except that, where crowd loading is likely, this may be increased to 4.8 kPa
(490 kg/m2).
2.3.4.2 Dispersion of railway live loads shall be as follows:
(a) Distribution through sleepers and ballast: The sleeper may be assumed to distribute the live load uniformly on top of the ballast over the area of contact given below:
TYPE 1 TYPE 2
Under each rail seat
BG 2745mm X 254mm 760mm X 330mm
MG 1830mm X 203 mm 610mm X 270mm
2.4 DYNAMIC EFFECT 2.4.1 Railway Bridges (Steel) 2.4.1.1 For Broad and Metre Gauge Railway: The augmentation in load due to dynamic effects should be considered by adding a load Equivalent to a Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA) multiplied by the live load giving the maximum stress in the member under consideration. The CDA should be obtained as follows and shall be applicable upto 160 km/h on BG and 100 km/h on MG – (a) For single track spans:
CDA= 0.15 +8
6+L
Where, L is the loaded length of span in metres for the position of the train giving the maximum
stress in the member under consideration.
41 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
2.4.2 Railway pipe culverts, arch bridges, concrete slabs and concrete girders. 2.4.2.1 For all gauges (a) If the depth of fill is less than 900mm, the Coefficient of Dynamic Augment shall be equal to- [2-(d/0.9)] *CDA/2 as obtained from Clause 2.4.1.1(a) Where, d = depth of fill in ‘m’. (b) If the depth of fill is 900mm, the Coefficient of Dynamic Augment shall be half of that specified in clause 2.4.1.1(a) subject to a maximum of 0.5. Where depth of fill exceeds 900mm, the Coefficient of Dynamic Augment shall be uniformly decreased to zero within the next 3 metres.
(c) In case of concrete girders of span of 25m and larger, the CDA shall be as specified in Clause 2.4.1.1.
APPENDIX - XXIII “25t Loading-2008” BROAD GAUGE-1676 mm Equivalent Uniformly Distributed Loads (EUDL) in kilo Newtons (tonnes) on each track, and Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA). For Bending Moment, L is equal to the effective span in metres. For Shear Force, L is the loaded length in metres to give the maximum Shear Force in the member under consideration. The Equivalent Uniformly Distributed Load (EUDL) for Bending Moment (BM), for spans upto 10m, is that uniformly distributed load which produces the BM at the centre of the span equal to the absolute maximum BM developed under the standard loads. For spans above 10m,
42 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
the EUDL for BM is that uniformly distributed load which produces the BM at one-sixth of the span equal to the BM developed at that section under the standard loads. EUDL for Shear Force (SF) is that uniformly distributed load which produces SF at the end of the span equal to the maximum SF developed under the standard loads at that section. NOTE:
1) Cross girders – The live load on a cross girder will be equal to half the total load for bending in a length L, equal to twice the distance over centres of cross girders.
2) L for Coefficient of Dynamic Augment (CDA) shall be as laid down in clause 2.4.1. 3) When loaded length lies between the values given in the table, the EUDL for Bending
Moment and Shear Force can be interpolated.
43 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
44 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
IRC 6-2000
207.1 Details of I.R.C Loadings 207.1.1 For bridges classified under Clause 201.1, the design live load shall consist of standard wheeled or tracked vehicles or trains of vehicles as illustrated in Figs. 1, 2 & 3 and Annex A. The trailers attached to the driving unit are not to be considered as detachable. 207.1.2 Within the kerb to kerb width of the roadway, the standard vehicle or train shall be assumed to travel parallel to the length of the bridge and to occupy any position which will produce maximum stresses provided that the minimum clearances between a vehicle and the roadway face of kerb and between two passing or crossing vehicles, shown in Figs. 1, 2 & 3, are not encroached upon. 207.1.3 For each standard vehicle or train, all the axles of a unit of vehicles shall be considered as acting simultaneously in a position causing maximum stresses.
IRS BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE
5.8.2 Earth Pressure Due To Surcharge on Abutments The horizontal active earth pressure P due to surcharge, dead and live loads per unit length on abutment will be worked out for the following two cases. Case-1: When depth of the section h is less than (L-B). Case-2: When depth of the section h is more than (L-B) . Where: L = Length of the abutment;
45 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
B = Width of uniform distribution of surcharge load at formation level; and h= Depth of the section below formation level.
P1=Force due to active earth pressure on ‘abde’ P2 = Force due to active earth pressure on ‘bcd.
P1 = (S+V)
B+h*h*ka acting at
h
2 from section under consideration
P2 = (S+V)
2B(B+h)*h2*ka acting at
2h
3 from section under consideration
46 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
P1 = Force due to active earth pressure on ‘’abdefg’’ P2 = Force due to active earth pressure on “bcd”
P1 = (S+V)
L*h*ka acting at
h
2 from section under consideration
P2 = (S+V)
2BL*(L-B) 2*ka acting at [h -
L−B
3] from section under consideration
Where, S = Live load surcharge for unit length. V = Dead load surcharge for unit length. h = Height of fill. This is assumed to act at a height of h/2 from base of the section under consideration. Surcharge due to live load and dead load may be assumed to extend upto the front face of the ballast wall.
47 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
ABOUT FEW OTHER R.U.B. BOX SITES VISITED
I. BOX PUSHING IN RAICHUR (Karnataka, India)
We visited Raichur where a RUB was under construction at a level crossing outside Raichur station
Yard. The site of construction is highly built (see satellite image below) so Box pushing method was
chosen; all of the construction method is similar to Box construction in Secunderabad which is
discussed in earlier sections.
But during the phase of excavation engineers encountered a hard rock (granite) stratum at depth
on 3.90m from ground level. So to excavate the site rock blasting was done with help of explosives.
To ensure safety of public the explosives were covered with rubber dampeners (layers truck tiers).
Satellite image of RUB construction site in Raichur, courtesy Google maps
Engineers encountered another problem during this RUB construction a city sewer pipe line was
passing through the construction site and it caused lot of hindrance during construction of Thrust
bed, so engineers diverted the sewer pipe line. There was problem of excess seepage of water into
construction site, so engineers have built retaining walls and have put a pump system to suck
water away from construction site. Chiseling was done inside the box while pushing the box in
embankment.
48 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
Pictures of RUB Box construction site in Raichur
49 | P a g e | INTERNSHIP REPORT |
2. BOX PUSHING IN SAFILGUGA (Hyderabad, India)
We visited a box pushing site in Safilguda in Hyderabad. Here engineers wanted a major drainage
to cross a railway embankment so they chose to go for a box culvert which is to be pushed into
embankment as that area is highly built and the railway line is active.
Satellite image of site in Safilguda, courtesy Google maps