Reforming Public Services in India: Drawing Lessons from Success Vikram K. Chand The World Bank February 2, 2005
Jan 18, 2016
Reforming Public Services in India: Drawing Lessons from
Success
Vikram K. ChandThe World Bank
February 2, 2005
Objectives of the Report The report documents 25 cases of success in
improving public services across sectors/states. Cases were chosen on the basis of three
criteria: (a) Substantial institutional reforms introduced, (b) Documented success in improving outcomes through user surveys, objective indicators, and external recognition, and (c) initiatives in existence for at least two years.
The main objective was to draw lessons on how to improve public service delivery across sectors.
Success in a Difficult Environment These reforms took hold, despite
serious systemic obstacles to improving public delivery systems.
These systemic obstacles include: Overstaffing. Frequent transfers of public servants. Weak anti-corruption enforcement
mechanisms. The need for electoral financing reform.
The Enabling Environment
The Role of Political Leadership Vision Counts: The political leadership
influenced the kinds of reforms pursued in several states, like AP, MP, and Karnataka.
Bipartisan consensus across party lines facilitated reforms to improve program delivery in Tamil Nadu.
Electoral incentives motivated political leaders to support change in Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh.
An Empowered Civil Service Stability of tenure crucial to empowering
civil servants spearheading reform initiatives.
Managerial autonomy for decision-making. Political support and signaling.
Civil Servants when empowered by political leaders can be an effective instrument for innovation in service delivery.
The Role of Civil Society Civil society and media as source of
pressure for change. MKSS in Rajasthan.
Civil society as partner in implementation The Bangalore Agenda Task Force
Several initiatives actively sought to spark demand for change. Delhi’s Public Grievances Commission
INSTRUMENTS FOR REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
Simplifying Transactions: Cases Report examined several cases using
e-governance to simplify transactions. One-stop-shops: E-Sewa and Friends Government Certificates: Bhoomi Rural Card in Andhra Pradesh Computerizing Inter-state Check-
posts in Gujarat.
Simplifying Transactions: Lessons High-level political support key to
overcoming resistance. Stability of tenure for administrative
champions necessary. Importance of Public-Private Partnerships
in E-Governance Low levels of citizen awareness in rural
areas an obstacle to change. No jobs lost in any of these initiatives: Win-
Win Reforms.
Restructuring Agency Processes: Cases
State-Wide Agencies Maharashtra’s Registration Department The Karnataka State and Road Transport
Corporation. City-Wide Agencies
Transforming City Agencies in Bangalore Reforms in the Surat Municipal Corporation Making the Hyderabad Water Supply and
Sewerage Board more responsive.
Restructuring Agency Processes: Key Lessons Business process re-engineering needs to
accompany computerization. Centralized monitoring systems can
empower senior management in relation to front-line staff and junior management.
Inter-agency coordination needed to break down silos.
Restoring Performance Incentives in Agencies.
More Effective Linkages with Civil Society Needed.
Promoting Competition: Cases and LessonsCases: Telecom Reform in India, 1980-2004. Opening up Rural Marketing in MP.Lessons: Conventional wisdom borne out: Competition benefited
consumers in telecom and farmers in MP. Rent-seeking by vested interests curbed. Strong action at highest-levels needed to push reform
PMO push reform in the Telecom case. MP government amend Mandi laws to allow for
greater private participation.
Decentralization: Cases and Lessons
Cases: Surat After the Plague, 1994-2005. Decentralizing Teacher Management in MP.Lessons: Decentralization in Surat freed the municipal
commissioner to focus on policy issues and empowered zonal commissioners, on the ground, to deal with a fast-changing situation.
Decentralizing teacher control to PRIs in MP lowered teacher absenteeism and reinforced accountability.
Use of para-teachers made it possible to extend a decentralized model of teacher management in MP that boosted school enrollment in a fiscally-constrained setting.
Building Political Support for Program Delivery
Comparing HD Outcomes in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.
Both States possess similar human development outcomes in 1981; By 2001, Tamil Nadu had jumped to third place while Karnataka remained in seventh place, despite similar rates of economic growth.
Gap is now narrowing, but the question remains why TN was a superior performer in the 1980’s and 1990’s on the whole.
Key difference is the role of the Tamil Nadu government in fashioning a set of public policies and interventions to boost human development beyond what might have been expected by growth alone.
Welfarism and Politics in Tamil Nadu DMK and AIDMK share similar ideology rooted
in the thought of ‘Periyar’ E.V. Ramaswamy. Food crisis in the late 1960’s led to the end of
the Congress hegemony in Tamil Nadu: Both DMK and AIDMK learned early on the importance of social programs for electoral success.
Both parties engage in one-upmanship to extend social programs, including the adoption of a universal PDS system, a midday meal scheme in 1982, effective family planning and nutritional interventions.
Political Support Spurred Tamil Nadu’s Civil Service into Action Programs effectively implemented by Tamil
Nadu’s civil service. Collector in TN a senior officer unlike many
states; TN also have no divisional commissioner system to dilute the collectors’ power; and Secretaries possess tradition of autonomy in implementation in the state.
Karnataka lacked an entrenched welfarist ideology to push social programs: Mid-day meal scheme in the state, for example, not launched until 2002; northern Karnataka remains behind the rest of the state.
Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms: Cases
Reducing Frequent Transfers in Karnataka. Report Cards in Bangalore, 1994-2004. Right to Information: Rajasthan and Delhi. Strengthening Anti-Corruption Institutions
The Central Vigilance Commission The Karnataka Lok Ayukta
Public Interest Litigation and the Courts.
Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms: Premature Transfers
Karnataka reduced premature transfers through quantitative caps, computerized counseling in education, and public reporting of transfer numbers.
New approaches might involve the creation of statutory civil services boards to restrict transfers, legal minimum tenures, and a stability index to track transfers.
Aggregate Transfers, Karnataka, 2000-05
Total Group A, B, C and D Transfers - Government of Karnataka (2000-2005)
16798
30275
34017
54333
8211
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 (April-Sept)
Year
Em
plo
yees
in T
ho
usa
nd
s
Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms: Report Cards Report cards prod agency heads into
action, and mobilize public pressure for change.Satisfaction with Public Services Across CRCs
4 6 9 5
25
1
14
46 45
3025
43
16 18
54
71 73
18
37
15
65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
BWSSB BESCOM BSNL BMP GovtHospital
BDA RTO
Agency
Pe
rce
ntg
e
1994 1999 2003
Strengthening Accountability Mechanisms: Other Lessons Anti-corruption Institutions need to focus
more on corruption in service delivery; the media can be an important ally when prosecution is difficult.
Access to information laws work best when appeals processes are simple and pressure from below encourage their use.
The role of the Courts in improving delivery has been positive Need to guard against risk of supplanting administrative initiatives to reform services.
Tactics of Reform Justifying reform by invoking past traditions Dealing with employees (e.g.
accommodating potential spoilers, guaranteeing no job losses upfront, improving working conditions).
Activating constituencies that gain from reform against opponents of the process
Sequencing is critical for SuccessAll reforms were incremental in nature; the big bang approach in the rare cases where it was tried did not deliver results. Vested interests were overcome in many cases.
Sustaining Reforms Popular reforms usually survived
political transitions. Bipartisan consensus helped
sustainability. Grounding reforms in law made them
harder to reverse. Sound revenue models facilitated
sustainability.
Transplanting Reforms Not a mechanical process; reforms are
often highly context-bound. Competition between agencies, cities, and
states help spread of ideas/innovations. NGO networks facilitate transmission of
knowledge about good practices. GoI can play an important role in
facilitating cross-state/agency interactions; establishing an overarching monitoring system; and structuring incentives for reform.