References - Springer978-3-658-09665-6/1.pdfReferences 197 Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice.Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press. Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic

References

Abbott, A. D. (2004). Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Abrahamson, E. (1996). ‘Management fashion’. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), 254-285.

Academy of Management (2012). Divisions and interest groups. http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?id=18 (accessed 15 January 2012).

Aldrich, H. (1988). ‘Paradigm warriors: Donaldson versus the critics of organization theory’. Organization Studies, 9 (1), 19-25.

Allan, G. (2008). ‘Pragmatism and process’, in Weber, M. and Desmond, W. (Eds), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, Vol. 1, 325-337. Heusen-stamm: Ontos.

Alvesson, M. (2008). ‘The future of critical management studies’, in Barry, D. and Hansen, H. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization, 15-26. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. A. (2006). ‘Critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 255-283. Lon-don: SAGE.

Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2011). ‘Generating research questions through prob-lematization’. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 247-271.

Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2013). ‘Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research’. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (1), 128-152.

Ambrosini, V., Jenkins, M. and Collier, N. (Eds) (2007). Advanced strategic manage-ment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Anacker, M. (2012). ‘Transforming main issues of philosophy of science pragmati-cally’, in Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (Eds), Revisiting pragmatism: William James in the new millenium, 217-227. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood: Jones-Irwin. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for

growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs: Pren-

tice-Hall.

D. Djurić, Strategy Tools as Symbolic Objects in Managerial Language Games, Schriften zur Unternehmensentwicklung, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-09665-6, © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

194 References

Ansoff, H. I. (1991). ‘Critique of Henry Mintzberg's 'The design school: Reconsider-ing the basic premises of strategic management'’. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), 449-461.

Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action per-spective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Armstrong, J. S. and Brodie, R. J. (1994). ‘Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: Experimental results’. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11 (1), 73-84.

Ashley, D. (1990). ‘Habermas and the completion of 'the project of modernity'’, in Turner, B. S. (Ed), Theories of modernity and postmodernity, 88-107. London, Newbury Park: SAGE.

Astley, W. G. (1984). ‘Subjectivity, sophistry and symbolism in management science’. Journal of Management Studies, 21 (3), 259-272.

Astley, W. G. (1985). ‘Administrative science as socially constructed truth’. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 30 (4), 497-513.

Astley, W. G. and Zammuto, R. F. (1992). ‘Organization science, managers, and lan-guage games’. Organization Science, 3 (4), 443-460.

Bacharach, S. B. (1989). ‘Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation’. Acad-

emy of Management Review, 14 (4), 496-515. Bachiochi, P. D. and Weiner, S. P. (2002). ‘Qualitative data collection and analysis’, in

Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organiza-tional psychology, 161-183. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bagshaw, M. and Bagshaw, C. (2001). ‘Co-opetition applied to training - a case study’. Industrial & Commercial Training, 33 (5), 175-177.

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. (1980). Wittgenstein: Understanding and meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.

Baker, T., Miner, A. S. and Eesley, D. T. (2003). ‘Improvising firms: Bricolage, ac-count giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process’. Re-search Policy, 32 (2), 255-276.

Baker, T. and Nelson, R. E. (2005). ‘Creating something from nothing: Resource con-struction through entrepreneurial bricolage’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (3), 329-366.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

References 195

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Te-xas Press.

Bakken, T. and Hernes, T. (2006). ‘Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead’. Organization Studies, 27 (11), 1599-1616.

Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2007). ‘Strategy as practice perspective’, in Ambrosini, V., Jenkins, M. and Collier, N. (Eds), Advanced strategic manage-ment, 196-211. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Balogun, J., Pye, A. and Hodgkinson, G. P. (2008). ‘Cognitively skilled organizational decision making: Making sense of deciding’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 233-249. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard Univer-sity Press.

Barney, J. B. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.

Barney, J. B. (2001). ‘Is the resource-based 'view' a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes’. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 41-56.

Barrett, M., Constantinides, P. and Oborn, E. (2011). Materiality and new visibilities: Performance management and the managing of performances in multidiscipli-nary healthcare teams. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process organization studies. Corfu.

Barry, D. and Elmes, M. (1997). ‘Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse’. Academy of Management Review, 22 (2), 429-452.

Barry, D. and Hansen, H. (Eds) (2008). The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton. Baumann, G. (Ed) (1986). The written word: Literacy in transition. New York, Oxford:

Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press. Bauman, Z. (1988). ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity (book review)’. Sociol-

ogy, 22 (3), 473-475. Baum, H.-G., Coenenberg, A. G. and Günther, T. (2007). Strategisches Controlling.

Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. Bell, B. I. (1926). Postmodernism and other essays. Mliwaukee: Morehouse Publish-

ing Company. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting.

New York: Basic Books.

196 References

Bell, D. A. (1990). Husserl. London, New York: Routledge. Benton, T. and Craib, I. (2001). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foun-

dations of social thought. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in

the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday. Berger, U. and Bernhard-Mehlich, I. (2006). ‘Die Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ent-

scheidungstheorie’, in Kieser, A. and Ebers, M. (Eds), Organisationstheorien, 169-192. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of conscious-ness. London: Sonnenschein.

Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. London: Macmillan. Bergson, H. (1912). An introduction to metaphysics. New York: Putnam. Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and memory. New York: Zone Books. Bergson, H. (2002). The creative mind: An introduction in metaphysics. New

York: Kensington. Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and

praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Bertilsson, T. M. (2004). ‘The elementary forms of pragmatism: On different types of

abduction’. European Journal of Social Theory, 7 (3), 371-389. Beyer, J. M. and Trice, H. M. (1982). ‘The utilization process: A conceptual frame-

work and synthesis of empirical findings’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4), 591-622.

Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Atlantic Highlands, Hassocks: Har-vester Press, Humanities Press.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: Uni-versity of California Press.

Blumer, H. (1973). ‘A note on symbolic interactionism’. American Sociological Re-view, 38 (6), 797-798.

Boisot, M. H. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the in-formation economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boje, D. M. (1995). ‘Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as 'Tamara-land'’. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (4), 997-1035.

Boland, R. J. and Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). ‘Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing’. Organization Science, 6 (4), 350-372.

Bontis, N. and Choo, C. W. (Eds) (2002). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: A collection of readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

References 197

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Boxenbaum, E. and Rouleau, L. (2011). ‘New knowledge products as bricolage: Meta-

phors and scripts in organizational theory’. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 272-296.

Bracken, J. A. (2002). ‘Whitehead and the critique of logocentrism’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststruc-turalist postmodernisms, 91-110. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Brady, R. H. (1998). ‘The idea in nature: Rereading Goethe's organics’, in Seamon, D. and Zajonc, A. (Eds), Goethe's way of science: A phenomenology of nature, 83-111. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Brewerton, P. and Millward, L. (2001). Organizational research methods: A guide for students and researchers. London: SAGE.

Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991). ‘Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating’. Organiza-tion Science, 2 (1), 40-57.

Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2001). ‘Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective’. Organization Science, 12 (2), 198-213.

Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard Univer-sity Press.

Bruns, H. (2011). Empirical evidence to explicate the process of knowledge develop-ment. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process organiza-tion studies. Corfu.

Bryson, N. (1988). ‘The gaze in the expanded field’, in Foster, H. (Ed), Vision and visuality, 87-108. Seattle: Bay Press.

Buaron, R. (1981a). ‘How to win the market-share game? Try changing the rules’. Management Review, 70 (2), 8-17.

Buaron, R. (1981b). ‘New-game strategies’. McKinsey Quarterly, 17 (1), 24-40. Buchanan, D. A. and Bryman, A. (Eds) (2009). The SAGE handbook of organizational

research methods. Los Angeles: SAGE. Buchler, J. (1968). The concept of method. London, New York: Columbia Univer-

sity Press. Burrell, G. (1988). ‘Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The

contribution of Michel Foucault’. Organization Studies, 9 (2), 221-235. Burrell, G. (1994). ‘Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 4: The

contribution of Jürgen Habermas’. Organization Studies, 15 (1), 1-19.

198 References

Burrell, G. (1996). ‘Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), Handbook of organi-zation studies, 642-658. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analy-sis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.

Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P. and Johnson-Cramer, M. (2008). ‘The social construction of

rationality in organizational decision making’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Star-buck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 399-417. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Calvino, I. (1989). The literature machine: Essays. London: Picador. Cameron, K. S. (Ed) (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple

model. New York: Academic Press. Carnap, R. (1959). Foundations of logic and mathematics. Chicago: University of Chi-

cago Press. Carr, A., Durant, R. and Downs, A. (2004). ‘Emergent strategy development, abduc-

tion, and pragmatism: New lessons for corporations’. Human Systems Manage-ment, 23 (2), 79-91.

Case, K. (2011). American pragmatism and poetic practice: Crosscurrents from Emer-son to Susan Howe. Rochester: Camden House.

Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the sci-ence of surprise. New York: HarperCollins.

Ceccato, S. (1962/1964). Un tecnico fra i filosofi. Padua: Marsilio. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the indus-

trial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chesley, J. A. and Wenger, M. S. (1999). ‘Transforming an organization: Using models

to foster a strategic conversation’. California Management Review, 41 (3), 54-73. Chia, R. (1994). ‘The concept of decision: A deconstructive analysis’. Journal of Man-

agement Studies, 31 (6), 781-806. Chia, R. (1995). ‘From modern to postmodern organizational analysis’. Organization

Studies, 16 (4), 579-604. Chia, R. (1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Berlin: de Gruy-

ter. Chia, R. (1998). ‘From complexity science to complex thinking: Organization as sim-

ple location’. Organization, 5 (3), 341-369.

References 199

Chia, R. (1999). ‘A 'rhizomic' model of organizational change and transformation: Per-spective from a metaphysics of change’. British Journal of Management, 10 (3), 209-227.

Chia, R. (2002). ‘Essai: Time, duration and simultaneity: Rethinking process and change in organizational analysis’. Organization Studies, 23 (6), 863-868.

Chia, R. (2003). ‘The production of management knowledge: Philosophical underpin-nings of research design’, in Partington, D. (Ed), Essential skills for management research, 1-19. London: SAGE.

Chia, R. and King, I. (2001). ‘The language of organization theory’, in Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (Eds), The language of organization, 310-328. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Chia, R. and Langley, A. (2004). ‘The first organization studies summer workshop: Theorizing process in organizational research (call for papers)’. Organization Studies, 25 (8), 1486.

Child, J. (1972). ‘Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice’. Sociology, 6 (1), 1-22.

Choo, C. W., Detlor, B. and Turnbull, D. (2000). Web work: Information seeking and knowledge work on the world wide web. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publish-ers Group.

Clark, D. N. (1997). ‘Strategic management tool usage: A comparative study’. Strate-gic Change, 6 (7), 417-427.

Clark, T. (2002). ‘A Whiteheadian chaosmos? Process philosophy from a Deleuzean perspective’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms, 191-207. Albany: State Uni-versity of New York Press.

Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world. London, Newbury Park: SAGE.

Clegg, S. and Hardy, C. (2006). ‘Representation and reflexivity’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of or-ganization studies, 425-443. London: SAGE.

Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (Eds) (2006). The SAGE hand-book of organization studies. London: SAGE.

Clegg, S., Hardy, C. and Nord, W. R. (Eds) (1996). Handbook of organization studies. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Cobb, J. B. (1964). ‘From crisis-theology to the post-modern world’. Centennial Re-view (8), 209-220.

200 References

Cobb, J. B. (1993). ‘Alfred North Whitehead’, in Griffin, D. R., Cobb, J. B., Ford, M. P., Gunter, P. A. Y. and Ochs, P. (Eds), Founders of constructive postmodern phi-losophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whitehead, and Hartshorne, 165-195. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Cobb, J. B. (2007). ‘Person-in-community: Whiteheadian insights into community and institution’. Organization Studies, 28 (4), 567-588.

Cobb, J. B. (2011). Personal communication at the Center for Process Studies. Code, M. (1995). Myths of reason: Vagueness, rationality, and the lure of logic. Atlan-

tic Highlands: Humanities Press. Code, M. (2008). ‘Symbolism: The organic functioning of reason’, in Weber, M. and

Desmond, W. (Eds), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, Vol. 1, 633-644. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

Comte, A. (1853). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte: In 2 volumes. Lon-don: Chapman.

Conant, J. (2011). ‘Wittgenstein's methods’, in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, 620-645. New York, Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

Conger, J. A. (1991). ‘Inspiring others: The language of leadership’. Executive, 5 (1), 31-45.

Connolly, T. and Koput, K. (1997). ‘Naturalistic decision making and the new organ-izational context’, in Shapira, Z. (Ed), Organizational decision making, 285-303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. (1999). ‘Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing’. Organi-zation Science, 10 (4), 381-400.

Cooper, R. (1989). ‘Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida’. Organization Studies, 10 (4), 479-502.

Cooper, R. (1990). ‘Organization/disorganization’, in Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (Eds), The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new perspectives, 167-197. London: Routledge.

Cooper, R. (1992). ‘Systems and organizations: Distal and proximal thinking’. Sys-temic Practice and Action Research, 5 (4), 373-377.

Cooper, R. and Burrell, G. (1988). ‘Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction’. Organization Studies, 9 (1), 91-112.

Corman, S. R. (2005). ‘Postpositivism’, in May, S. and Mumby, D. K. (Eds), Engaging organizational communication theory & research: Multiple perspectives, 15-34. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

References 201

Corradi, G., Gherardi, S. and Verzelloni, L. (2010). ‘Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading?’. Management Learning, 41 (3), 265-283.

Crary, J. and Kwinter, S. (Eds) (1992). Incorporations. New York: Zone Books. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). ‘Prudent aspirations for social inquiry’, in Kruskal, W. (Ed),

The social sciences: Their nature and uses: Papers presented at the 50th anni-versary of the Social Science Research Building, the University of Chicago, De-cember 16-18, 1979, 61-81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cronshaw, S. (2011). Whitehead on matter matters: Implications for process organiza-tion studies. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process or-ganization studies. Corfu.

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Daft, R. L. (1983). ‘Learning the craft of organizational research’. Academy of Man-

agement Review, 8 (4), 539-546. Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E. (1984). ‘Toward a model of organizations as interpreta-

tion systems’. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 284-295. Daniell, A. (2002). ‘Preface’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and differ-

ence: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms, xix-xxiii. Al-bany: State University of New York Press.

Davis, M. S. (1971). ‘That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1 (2), 309-344.

Debrock, G. (2003). ‘Introduction: Process pragmatism’, in Debrock, G. (Ed), Process pragmatism: Essays on a quiet philosophical revolution, 1-10. Amster-dam: Rodopi.

Debrock, G. (Ed) (2003). Process pragmatism: Essays on a quiet philosophical revolu-tion. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Deetz, S. A. (2009). ‘Organizational research as alternative ways of attending to and talking about structures and activities’, in Buchanan, D. A. and Bryman, A. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods, 21-38. Los An-geles: SAGE.

Deleuze, G. (1988a). Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books. Deleuze, G. (1988b). Foucault. London: Athlone. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena: And other essays on Husserl's theory of

signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

202 References

Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, J. (1981a). Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, J. (1981b). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Derrida, J. (2000). ‘Et cetera’, in Royle, N. (Ed), Deconstructions: A user's guide,

282-305. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Desa, G. (2012). ‘Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bri-

colage as a mechanism of institutional transformation’. Entrepreneurship: The-ory & Practice, 36 (4), 727-751.

Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction in philosophy. New York: Holt. Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and

action. New York: Minton, Balch & Co. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H. and Tracey, P. (2010). ‘Social bricolage: Theorizing so-

cial value creation in social enterprises’. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34 (4), 681-703.

Dibben, M. R. (2008). ‘Management and organization studies’, in Weber, M. and Des-mond, W. (Eds), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, Vol. 1, 127-143. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

Dibben, M. R. and Cobb, J. B. (2003). ‘Process thought and organization studies’. Process Studies, 32 (2), 179-182.

Dibben, M. R. and Munro, I. (2003). ‘Applying process thought in organization stud-ies’. Process Studies, 32 (2), 183-195.

Dibben, M. R. and Smallman, C. (2005). Ignoring convention? Reframing process thinking in organizational analysis. Paper presented at the 1st Organization Stud-ies workshop on ‘Theorizing process in organizational research’. Santorini.

Dionysiou, D. D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). ‘Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective’. Academy of Management Review, 38 (2), 181-205.

Donaldson, L. (1985). In defence of organization theory: A reply to the critics. Cam-bridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Donaldson, L. (1992). ‘The Weick stuff: Managing beyond games’. Organization Sci-ence, 3 (4), 461-466.

Donaldson, L. (1996a). For positivist organization theory: Proving the hard core. Lon-don: SAGE.

Donaldson, L. (1996b). ‘The normal science of structural contingency theory’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), Handbook of organization studies, 57-76. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

References 203

Donaldson, L. (2005). ‘Organization theory as a positive science’, in Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 39-62. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dowling, M. J., Roering, W. D., Carlin, B. A. and Wisnieski, J. (1996). ‘Multifaceted relationships under coopetition’. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5 (2), 155-167.

Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Oxford: Blackwell. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Brothers. Drucker, P. F. (1970). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society.

London: Heinemann. Drucker, P. F. (1994). ‘The age of social transformation’. The Atlantic Monthly,

138 (11), 53-78. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. New York: Free Press. Duymedjian, R. and Rüling, C.-C. (2010). ‘Towards a foundation of bricolage in or-

ganization and management theory’. Organization Studies, 31 (2), 133-151. Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. A. (2003). The Blackwell handbook of organiza-

tional learning and knowledge management. Malden: Blackwell. Eastman, T. E. (2004). ‘Duality without dualism’, in Eastman, T. E. and Keeton, H.

(Eds), Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, process, and experience, 14-30. Al-bany: State University of New York Press.

Eastman, T. E. and Keeton, H. (Eds) (2004). Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, proc-ess, and experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Ebers, M. (1985). ‘Understanding organizations: The poetic mode’. Journal of Man-agement, 11 (2), 51-62.

EGOS Standing Working Group 05 (2012). Strategizing: Activity and practice. http://www.egosnet.org/swgs/current_swgs/swg_05 (accessed 17 April 2012).

EGOS Standing Working Group 12 (2012). Understanding organization as process. http://www.egosnet.org/swgs/current_swgs/swg_12 (accessed 17 April 2012).

Eikeland, O. and Nicolini, D. (2011). ‘Turning practically: broadening the horizon’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24 (2), 164-174.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Santos, F. M. (2002). ‘Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy?’, in Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Handbook of strategy and management, 139-164. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process: The development of manners: Changes in the code of conduct and feeling in early modern times. New York: Urizen Books.

204 References

Elkjaer, B. and Simpson, B. (2011). ‘Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory?’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization theory, 55-84. Bingley: Emerald.

Empson, L. (2001a). ‘Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms’. Human Rela-tions, 54 (7), 839-862.

Empson, L. (2001b). ‘Introduction: Knowledge management in professional service firms’. Human Relations, 54 (7), 811-818.

Esslinger, A. S. (Ed) (2007). Erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Work-Life Balance in Orga-nisationen: Strategien, Konzepte, Maßnahmen. Wiesbaden: DUV.

Evered, R. (1983). ‘The language of organizations. The case of the Navy’, in Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G. and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds), Organizational symbol-ism, 125-143. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Faris, R. E. L. (Ed) (1964). Handbook of modern sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally. Farmer, D. J. (2012). ‘Theorizing in perspective’. Administrative Theory & Praxis,

34 (2), 180-190. Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (2006). ‘Introduction’, in Faulkner, D. and Campbell,

A. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy, 1-24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (Eds) (2006). The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fayard, A.-L. and DeSanctis, G. (2008). ‘Kiosks, clubs and neighborhoods: The lan-guage games of online forums’. Journal of the Association for Information Sys-tems, 9 (10), 677-705.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowl-edge. London: Humanities Press.

Feyerabend, P. K. (1978). Science in a free society. London: NLB. Feyerabend, P. K. (1979). Erkenntnis für freie Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhr-

kamp. Feyerabend, P. K. (1987). Farewell to reason. London, New York: Verso. Feyerabend, P. K. (2011). The tyranny of science. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press. Fiol, C. M. (1989). ‘A semiotic analysis of corporate language: Organizational

boundaries and joint venturing’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (2), 277-303.

References 205

Fisher, G. (2012). ‘Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research’. Entrepreneurship: The-ory & Practice, 36 (5), 1019-1051.

Fiske, D. W. and Shweder, R. A. (Eds) (1986). Metatheory in social science: Plural-isms and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Floyd, S. W. and Wooldridge, B. (2000). Building strategy from the middle: Reconcep-tualizing strategy process. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cog-

nitive science. Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press. Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of

mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. Foster, H. (Ed) (1988). Vision and visuality. Seattle: Bay Press. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Lon-

don: Tavistock Publications. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications. Franck, H., Cornelissen, J. P. and Zundel, M. (2013). Re-processing organization stud-

ies: Rethinking key organizational themes through a processual lens. Call for pa-pers for the annual EGOS meeting in Rotterdam in 2014. http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1368705858152&subtheme_id=1361932433083 (ac-cessed 16 September 2013).

Franklin, S. F. (2008). ‘Theory of language’, in Weber, M. and Desmond, W. (Eds), Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought, Vol. 2, 5-20. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

Freese, L. (1980). ‘Formal theorizing’. Annual Review of Sociology, 6 (1), 187-212. Friedl, H. (2012). ‘The ontology of William James: Thinking in images and images of

thinking’, in Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (Eds), Revisiting pragmatism: William Ja-mes in the new millenium, 51-69. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

Furrer, O. and Thomas, H. (2000). ‘The rivalry matrix: Understanding rivalry and competitive dynamics’. European Management Journal, 18 (6), 619-637.

Gare, A. (2002). ‘The roots of postmodernism. Schelling, process philosophy, and

poststructuralism’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms, 31-53. Albany: Sta-te University of New York Press.

Garud, R. (1997). ‘On the distinction between know-how, know-why, and know-what’, in Walsh, J. P. and Huff, A. S. (Eds), Organizational learning and strate-gic management, 81-101. Greenwich: JAI Press.

206 References

Garud, R. and Karnøe, P. (2003). ‘Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and em-bedded agency in technology entrepreneurship’. Research Policy, 32 (2), 277-300.

Gergen, K. J. (1978). ‘Toward generative theory’. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36 (11), 1344-1360.

Gergen, K. J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). ‘The social constructionist movement in modern psychology’. American Psychologist, 40 (3), 266-275.

Gergen, K. J. (1986). ‘Correspondence versus autonomy in the language of under-standing human action’, in Fiske, D. W. and Shweder, R. A. (Eds), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities, 136-162. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1992). ‘Organization theory in the postmodern era’, in Reed, M. I. and Hughes, M. (Eds), Rethinking organization, 207-226. London: SAGE.

Gergen, K. J. (2010). ‘Co-constitution, causality, and confluence: Organizing in a world without entities’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemak-ing, and organizing, 55-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gergen, K. J., Schrader, S. M. and Gergen, M. M. (2009). Constructing worlds to-gether: Interpersonal communication as relational process. Boston: Pear-son/AandB.

Gherardi, S. (1999). ‘Learning as problem-driven or learning in the face of mystery?’. Organization Studies, 20 (1), 101-123.

Gherardi, S. (2000). ‘Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organiza-tions’. Organization, 7 (2), 211-224.

Gherardi, S. (2001). ‘From organizational learning to practice-based knowing’. Human Relations, 54 (1), 131-139.

Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell.

Gherardi, S. (2009). ‘Introduction: The critical power of the 'practice lens'’. Manage-ment Learning, 40 (2), 115-128.

Gherardi, S., Nicolini, D. and Strati, A. (2007). ‘The passion for knowing’. Organiza-tion, 14 (3), 315-329.

Gherardi, S. and Perrotta, M. (2011). ‘Egg dates sperm: A tale of a practice change and its stabilization’. Organization, 18 (5), 595-614.

Giddens, A. (1981). ‘Modernism and post-modernism’. New German Critique, 9 (22, special issue on modernism), 15-18.

References 207

Giddens, A. (1984a). Interpretative Soziologie: Eine kritische Einführung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Giddens, A. (1984b). The constitution of society: Introduction of the theory of structu-ration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gioia, D. A. (1986). ‘Symbols, scripts, and sensemaking. Creating meaning in the or-ganizational experience’, in Sims, H. P. and Gioia, D. A. (Eds), The thinking or-ganization, 49-74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gioia, D. A. (2007). ‘Individual epistemology - interpretive wisdom’, in Kessler, E. H. and Bailey, J. R. (Eds), Handbook of organizational and managerial wisdom, 277-294. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K. (1991). ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation’. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), 433-448.

Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday. Golden-Biddle, K. and Azuma, J. (2010). ‘Constructing contribution in 'strategy as

practice' research’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 79-90. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gold, J., Walton, J., Cureton, P. and Anderson, L. (2011). ‘Theorising and practitioners in HRD: The role of abductive reasoning’. Journal of European Industrial Train-ing, 35 (3), 230-246.

Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds) (2010a). Cambridge hand-book of strategy as practice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (2010b). ‘Introduction: What is strategy as practice?’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 1-20. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gouldner, A. W. (1973). For sociology: Renewal and critique in sociology today. New York: Basic Books.

Grand, S., Rüegg-Stürm, J. and Arx, W. von (2010). ‘Constructivist epistemologies in strategy as practice research’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 63-78. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Grant, R. M. (1996). ‘Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organiza-tional capability as knowledge integration’. Organization Science, 7 (4), 375-387.

208 References

Grant, R. M. (1997). ‘The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for man-agement practice’. Long Range Planning, 30 (3), 450-454.

Grant, R. M. (2002). ‘The knowledge-based view of the firm’, in Bontis, N. and Choo, C. W. (Eds), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: A collection of readings, 133-148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grant, R. M. (2006). ‘The knowledge-based view of the firm’, in Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy, 203-227. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Greenwood, D. J. and Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social re-search for social change. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Griffin, D. R. (1993a). ‘Introduction to SUNY series in constructive postmodern thought’, in Griffin, D. R., Cobb, J. B., Ford, M. P., Gunter, P. A. Y. and Ochs, P. (Eds), Founders of constructive postmodern philosophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whitehead, and Hartshorne, vii-x. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Griffin, D. R. (1993b). ‘Introduction: Constructive postmodern philosophy’, in Griffin, D. R., Cobb, J. B., Ford, M. P., Gunter, P. A. Y. and Ochs, P. (Eds), Founders of constructive postmodern philosophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whitehead, and Hartshorne, 1-42. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Griffin, D. R., Cobb, J. B., Ford, M. P., Gunter, P. A. Y. and Ochs, P. (Eds) (1993). Founders of constructive postmodern philosophy: Peirce, James, Bergson, Whi-tehead, and Hartshorne. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Griffith, T. L., Northcraft, G. B. and Fuller, M. A. (2008). ‘Borgs in the org? Organiza-tional decision making and technology’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 97-115. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press. Habermas, J. (1981). Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung.

Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Habermas, J. and Ben-Habib, S. (1981). ‘Modernity versus postmodernity’. New Ger-

man Critique, 9 (22, special issue on modernism), 3-14. Halewood, M. (2005). ‘A. N. Whitehead, information and social theory’. Theory, Cul-

ture & Society, 22 (6), 73-94. Halme, M., Lindeman, S. and Linna, P. (2012). ‘Innovation for inclusive business: In-

trapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations’. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (4), 743-784.

References 209

Hambrick, D. C., MacMillan, I. C. and Day, D. L. (1982). ‘Strategic attributes and per-formance in the BCG matrix - a PIMS-based analysis of industrial product busi-nesses’. Academy of Management Journal, 25 (3), 510-531.

Hanson, N. R. (1965). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual founda-tions of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Lon-don: Free Association.

Harris, E. E. (1970). Hypothesis and perception: The roots of scientific method. Lon-don, New York: Allen & Unwin, Humanities Press.

Hartshorne, C. (1983). Insights and oversights of great thinkers: An evaluation of Wes-tern philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (Eds) (1990). The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new perspectives. London: Routledge.

Hawthorn, G. (1991). Plausible worlds: Possibility and understanding in history and the social sciences. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag Hejl, P. M. (1985). Konstruktion der sozialen Konstruktion: Grundlinien einer kon-

struktivistischen Sozialtheorie. Siegen. Hejl, P. M. (2001). ‘Konstruktivismus und Universalien - Eine Verbindung contra na-

ture?’, in Hejl, P. M. (Ed), Universalien und Konstruktivismus, 7-67. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hejl, P. M. (Ed) (2001). Universalien und Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhr-kamp.

Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation: And other essays in the phi-losophy of science. New York: Free Press.

Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948). ‘Studies in the logic of explanation’. Phi-losophy of Science, 15 (2), 135-175.

Henderson, B. D. (1979). Henderson on corporate strategy. Cambridge: Abt Books. Herbst, P. G. (1976). Alternatives to hierarchies. Leiden: Nijhoff. Hernes, T. (2008). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled

world. London: Routledge. Hernes, T., Holt, R. and Helin, J. (2011). Understanding organization as process: Or-

ganization without design. Call for papers for the annual EGOS meeting in Hel-sinki in 2012. http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1204882312189&subtheme_id=1277261323799 (ac-cessed 17 April 2012).

210 References

Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (2010). ‘Process, sensemaking and organizing: An introduc-tion’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemaking, and organizing, 27-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds) (2010). Process, sensemaking, and organizing. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.

Hernes, T. and Weik, E. (2007). ‘Towards a theory of organizational becoming’, in Lang, R. and Schmidt, A. (Eds), Individuum und Organisation: Neue Trends ei-nes organisationswissenschaftlichen Forschungsfeldes, 73-95. Wiesbaden: DUV.

Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E. and Pennings, J. M. (1971). ‘A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 (2), 216-229.

Hill, C. W. L. and Jones, G. R. (2007). Strategic management: An integrated approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Hill, T. and Westbrook, R. (1997). ‘SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall’. Long Range Planning, 30 (1), 46-52.

Hocking, W. E. (1963). ‘Whitehead as I knew him’, in Kline, G. L. (Ed), Alfred North Whitehead: Essays on his philosophy, 7-17. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (2008). ‘Organizational decision making: Map-ping terrains on different planets’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 1-29. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds) (2008). The Oxford handbook of organ-izational decision making. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D. E. (1978). Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.

Hofstede, G. H. and Sami Kassem, M. (Eds) (1976). European contributions to or-ganization theory. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Holsinger, B. W. (2005). The premodern condition: Medievalism and the making of theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Holt, R. (1997). Wittgenstein, politics and human rights. London: Routledge. Homans, G. C. (1964). ‘Contemporary theory in sociology’, in Faris, R. E. L. (Ed),

Handbook of modern sociology, 951-977. Chicago: Rand McNally. Howard, R. A. (1988). ‘Decision analysis: Practice and promise’. Management Sci-

ence, 34 (6), 679-695. Huber, J. (1973). ‘Symbolic interaction as a pragmatic perspective. The bias of emer-

gent theory’. American Sociological Review, 38 (2), 274-284. Huff, A. S. and Reger, R. K. (1987). ‘A review of strategic process research’. Journal

of Management, 13 (2), 211-236.

References 211

Hutchins, C. K. (2002). ‘Unconforming becomings. The significance of Whitehead's novelty and Butler's subversion for the repetitions of lesbian identity and the ex-pansion of the future’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms, 111-145. Albany: State University of New York Press.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt. James, W. (1907/2010). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New

York: Longmans, Green, and Co. James, W. (1909/1996). A pluralistic universe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. James, W. (1911). Some problems of philosophy. Lincoln, London: University of Ne-

braska Press. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). ‘Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and prac-

tices-in-use’. Organization Studies, 25 (4), 529-560. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. Lon-

don: SAGE. Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007). ‘Strategizing: The challenges of a

practice perspective’. Human Relations, 60 (1), 5-27. Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2008). ‘Using strategy tools in practice: An explora-

tion of 'technologies of rationality' in use’. Academy of Management Proceed-ings, 1-6.

Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, A. P. (2009). ‘Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1), 69-95.

Jarzabkowski, P. and Wilson, D. C. (2006). ‘Actionable strategy knowledge: A practice perspective’. European Management Journal, 24 (5), 348-367.

Jencks, C. (1989). What is post-modernism? London, New York: Academy Editions, St. Martin's Press.

Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Johnson, G., Scholes, K. and Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy: Text & cases. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

212 References

Kaiser, S., Reindl, C. and Stolz, M. L. (2010). ‘Work-Life Balance in Professional Ser-vice Firms’, in Kaiser, S. and Ringlstetter, M. J. (Eds), Work-Life Balance: Er-folgversprechende Konzepte und Instrumente für Extremjobber, 67-81. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Kaiser, S. and Ringlstetter, M. J. (Eds) (2010). Work-Life Balance: Erfolgversprechen-de Konzepte und Instrumente für Extremjobber. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Kansy, S. (2011). Wechselwirkungen zwischen Organisation und Social Software in der Wissensarbeit. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Kant, I. (1781). Critik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Hartknoch. Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San

Francisco: Chandler. Kaplan, S. (2008). ‘Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty’. Organiza-

tion Science, 19 (5), 729-752. Kay, J., McKiernan, P. and Faulkner, D. (2006). ‘The history of strategy and some

thoughts about the future’, in Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy, 27-52. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.

Keeney, R. L. (1982). ‘Decision analysis: An overview’. Operations Research, 30 (5), 803-838.

Keller, C. (2002a). ‘Introduction: The process of difference, the difference of process’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmologi-cal and poststructuralist postmodernisms, 1-29. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Keller, C. (2002b). ‘Process and chaosmos. The Whiteheadian fold in the discourse of difference’, in Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms, 55-72. Albany: State Uni-versity of New York Press.

Keller, C. and Daniell, A. (Eds) (2002). Process and difference: Between cosmological and poststructuralist postmodernisms. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Kessler, E. H. and Bailey, J. R. (Eds) (2007). Handbook of organizational and mana-gerial wisdom. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Kieser, A. and Ebers, M. (Eds) (2006). Organisationstheorien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Kieser, A. and Walgenbach, P. (2007). Organisation. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. Kieser, A. and Wellstein, B. (2008). ‘Do activities of consultants and management sci-

entists affect decision making by managers?’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 495-516. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

References 213

Kirsch, W. (1991). Unternehmenspolitik und strategische Unternehmensführung. Mu-nich: Kirsch.

Kirsch, W. (1992). Kommunikatives Handeln, Autopoiese, Rationalität: Sondierungen zu einer evolutionären Führungslehre. Munich: Kirsch.

Kirsch, W. (1997). Wegweiser zur Konstruktion einer evolutionären Theorie der stra-tegischen Führung: Kapitel eines Theorieprojekts. Herrsching: Kirsch.

Kirsch, W., Seidl, D. and van Aaken, D. (2009). Unternehmensführung: Eine evolutio-näre Perspektive. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Klein, B. (2011). Coopetition: Knowledge sharing and learning in interorganisational alliances among competitors. Paper presented at the 27th EGOS Colloquium, Ju-ly 6-9, 2011. Gothenburg.

Klein, B. and Ringlstetter, M. J. (2013). Coopetitive dynamics: A dialectical perspec-tive on the evolution of alliances among competitors. Paper presented at the 29th EGOS Colloquium, July 4-6, 2013. Montréal.

Kline, G. L. (Ed) (1963). Alfred North Whitehead: Essays on his philosophy. Engle-wood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Knights, D. (1992). ‘Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management’. Academy of Management Review, 17 (3), 514-536.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cam-bridge: Harvard University Press.

Knott, P. (2008). ‘Strategy tools: Who really uses them?’. Journal of Business Strat-egy, 29 (5), 26-31.

Köck, W. K. (1991). ‘Kognition - Semantik - Kommunikation’, in Schmidt, S. J. (Ed), Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus, 340-373. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Koestler, A. (1966). Der göttliche Funke: Der schöpferische Akt in Kunst und Wissen-schaft. Bern, Munich: Scherz.

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’. Organization Science, 3 (3), 383-397.

Koppl, R. and Langlois, R. (2001). ‘Organizations and language games’. Journal of Management & Governance, 5 (3/4), 287-305.

Krogh, G. von and Roos, J. (1995). Organizational epistemology. Basingstoke, Hamp-shire: Macmillan.

Kruskal, W. (Ed) (1982). The social sciences: Their nature and uses: Papers presented at the 50th anniversary of the Social Science Research Building, the University of Chicago, December 16-18, 1979. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

214 References

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago Univer-sity Press.

Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds) (2011). The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about

the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and

its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books. Lakomski, G. and Evers, C. W. (2011). ‘Analytic philosophy and organization theory:

Philosophical problems and scientific solutions’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization theory, 23-54. Bingley: Emerald.

Langley, A. (2007). ‘Process thinking in strategic organization’. Strategic Organiza-tion, 5 (3), 271-282.

Langley, A. (2009). ‘Studying processes in and around organizations’, in Buchanan, D. A. and Bryman, A. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational research meth-ods, 409-429. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Langley, A. (2010). ‘The challenge of developing cumulative knowledge about strat-egy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 91–106. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E. and Saint-Macary, J. (1995). ‘Open-ing up decision making: The view from the black stool’. Organization Science, 6 (3), 260-279.

Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (2010). ‘Introducing 'Perspectives on process organiza-tion studies'’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemaking, and or-ganizing, 1-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lang, R. and Schmidt, A. (Eds) (2007). Individuum und Organisation: Neue Trends eines organisationswissenschaftlichen Forschungsfeldes. Wiesbaden: DUV.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participa-tion. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge. Lee, H. N. (1974). ‘Process and pragmatism’. Tulane studies in philosophy/Tulane

University, 23 (Studies in process philosophy I), 87-97.

References 215

Lennie, I. (2001). ‘Language that organizes: Plans and lists’, in Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (Eds), The language of organization, 47-65. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lewis, C. I. (1923). ‘A pragmatic conception of the a priori’. The Journal of Philoso-

phy, 20 (7), 169-177. Lewis, C. I. (1929/1956). Mind and the world-order: Outline of a theory of knowledge.

New York: Dover. Lewis, J. D. (1976). ‘The classic American pragmatists as forerunners to symbolic in-

teractionism’. Sociological Quarterly, 17 (3), 347-359. Lewis, J. D. and Smith, R. L. (1980). American sociology and pragmatism: Mead,

Chicago sociology, and symbolic interaction. Chicago: University of Chi-cago Press.

Liebhafsky, E. E. (1993). ‘The influence of Charles Sanders Peirce on institutional economics’. Journal of Economic Issues, 27 (3), 741-754.

Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed) (1985). Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolu-tion. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Linstead, S. A. (2002). ‘Organization as reply: Henri Bergson and casual organization theory’. Organization, 9 (1), 95-111.

Linstead, S. A. and Westwood, R. I. (2001). ‘Meaning beyond language: Monstrous openings’, in Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (Eds), The language of organi-zation, 329-346. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Locke, K. and Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). ‘Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and 'problematizing' in organizational studies’. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (5), 1023-1062.

Locke, K. and Golden-Biddle, K. (2002). ‘An introduction to qualitative research: Its potential and industrial and organizational psychology’, in Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology, 99-118. Oxford: Blackwell.

Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K. and Feldman, M. S. (2008). ‘Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process’. Organization Science, 19 (6), 907-918.

Luhman, J. T. and Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Key concepts in organization theory. Lon-don, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

216 References

Luhmann, N. (1976). ‘A general theory of organized social systems’, in Hofstede, G. H. and Sami Kassem, M. (Eds), European contributions to organization theory, 96-113. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Luhmann, N. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Éditions

de Minuit. Lyotard, J.-F. (2009). Das postmoderne Wissen: Ein Bericht. Wien: Passagen. Maartens, W. (2006). Mapping reality: A critical perspective on science and religion.

Lincoln: IUniverse. Machlup, F. (1983). ‘Semantic quirks in studies of information’, in Machlup, F. and

Mansfield, U. (Eds), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages, 641-672. New York: Wiley.

Machlup, F. and Mansfield, U. (Eds) (1983). The study of information: Interdiscipli-nary messages. New York: Wiley.

Mangham, I. L. (Ed) (1987). Organization analysis and development: A social con-struction of organizational behaviour. Chichester: Wiley.

Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowl-edge. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

March, J. G. (1986). ‘How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and admin-istrative life’, in Sergiovanni, T. J. and Corbally, J. E. (Eds), Leadership and or-ganizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice, 18-35. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and organizations. Oxford: Blackwell. March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York:

Free Press. March, J. G. (1997). ‘Understanding how decisions happen in organizations’, in Shapi-

ra, Z. (Ed), Organizational decision making, 9-32. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

March, J. G. (2006a). ‘Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence’. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (3), 201-214.

March, J. G. (2006b). ‘The myth of rationality’, in Zsolnai, L. (Ed), Interdisciplinary yearbook of business ethics, 17-30. Oxford: Lang.

March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley. Markóczy, L. and Deeds, D. L. (2009). ‘Theory building at the intersection: Recipe for

impact or road to nowhere?’. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (6), 1076-1088.

References 217

Marshall, A. and Sandberg, J. (2011). Sensemaking in ‘real’ versus virtual environ-ments: A comparison and challenge. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process organization studies. Corfu.

Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. and Beer, S. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The re-alization of the living. Boston, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Mauws, M. K. and Phillips, N. (1995). ‘Understanding language games’. Organization Science, 6 (3), 322-334.

Mayntz, R. (1976). ‘Conceptual models of organizational decision-making and their application to the policy process’, in Hofstede, G. H. and Sami Kassem, M. (Eds), European contributions to organization theory, 114-125. Assen: Van Gorcum.

May, S. and Mumby, D. K. (Eds) (2005). Engaging organizational communication theory & research: Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Mazza, C. and Alvarez, J. L. (2000). ‘Haute couture and prêt-à-porter: The popular press and the diffusion of management practices’. Organization Studies, 21 (3), 567-588.

McArthur, T. (1986). Worlds of reference: Lexicography, learning, and language from the clay tablet to the computer. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

McCall, M. W. and Lombardo, M. M. (Eds) (1978). Leadership: Where else can we go? Durham: Duke University Press.

McPhail, C. and Rexroat, C. (1979). ‘Mead vs. Blumer. The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism’. American So-ciological Review, 44 (3), 449-467.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mead, G. H. (1936/1972). Movements of thought in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mead, G. H. (1938/1967). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chi-cago Press.

Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Medina, J. (2004). ‘The meanings of silence: Wittgensteinian contextualism and po-

lyphony’. Inquiry, 47 (6), 562-579. Melville, H. (1970). Billy Budd sailor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Merton, R. K. (1967). On theoretical sociology. New York: Free Press. Meštrovi , S. G. (1998). Anthony Giddens: The last modernist. London, New

York: Routledge.

218 References

Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mintzberg, H. (1979). ‘An emerging strategy of ‘direct’ research’. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 24 (4), 582-589.

Mintzberg, H. (1987). ‘Crafting strategy’. Harvard Business Review, 65 (4), 66-75. Mintzberg, H. (2003). ‘The manager's job’, in Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, B.

and Ghoshal, S. (Eds), The strategy process: Concepts, contexts, cases. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. and Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. London: Prentice-Hall.

Mintzberg, H. and Lampel, J. (2003). ‘Reflecting on the strategy process’, in Mintz-berg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, B. and Ghoshal, S. (Eds), The strategy process: Con-cepts, contexts, cases, 22-29. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., Quinn, B. and Ghoshal, S. (Eds) (2003). The strategy proc-ess: Concepts, contexts, cases. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Théorêt, A. (1976). ‘The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (2), 246-275.

Mitroff, I. I. (1972). ‘The myth of objectivity or why science needs a new psychology of science’. Management Science, 18 (10), B613-B618.

Mitroff, I. I. (1978). ‘Systemic problem solving’, in McCall, M. W. and Lombardo, M. M. (Eds), Leadership: Where else can we go?, 129-143. Durham: Duke Uni-versity Press.

Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Moingeon, B. and Edmondson, A. C. (Eds) (1996). Organizational learning and com-petitive advantage. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Moisander, J. and Stenfors, S. (2009). ‘Exploring the edges of theory-practice gap: Epistemic cultures in strategy-tool development and use’. Organization, 16 (2), 227-247.

Montaigne, M. de (1922). ‘Apologie de Raimond Sebond’, in Villey, P. (Ed), Les es-sais de Michel de Montaigne, 143-371. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan.

Moore, E. C. (1961). American pragmatism: Peirce, James, and Dewey. New York: Columbia University Press.

Morgan, G. (1980). ‘Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (4), 605–622.

Morgan, G. (1982). ‘Cybernetics and organization theory: Epistemology or tech-nique?’. Human Relations, 35 (7), 521-537.

References 219

Morgan, G. (Ed) (1983). Beyond method: Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Morgan, G. (1983). ‘Rethinking corporate strategy: A cybernetic perspective’. Human Relations, 36 (4), 345-360.

Morgan, G. (1990). ‘Paradigm diversity in organizational research’, in Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (Eds), The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new perspectives, 13-29. London: Routledge.

Morgan, G. (1993). Imaginization: The art of creative management. Newbury Park: SAGE.

Morgan, G., Frost, P. J. and Pondy, L. R. (1983). ‘Organizational symbolism’, in Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G. and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds), Organizational symbolism, 3-35. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Morrison, A. and Wensley, R. (1991). ‘Boxing up or boxed in?: A short history of the Boston Consulting Group share/growth matrix’. Journal of Marketing Manage-ment, 7 (2), 105-129.

Mullarkey, J. (2010). ‘Stop making (philosophical) sense: Notes towards a process organizational-thinking beyond 'philosophy'’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemaking, and organizing, 38-54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Müller-Stewens, G. and Lechner, C. (2003). ‘Strategische Prozessforschung. Grundla-gen und Perspektiven’, in Ringlstetter, M. J., Henzler, H. A. and Mirow, M. (Eds), Perspektiven der strategischen Unternehmensführung: Theorien - Konzep-te - Anwendungen, 43-71. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Mumby, D. K. and May, S. (2005). ‘Introduction: Thinking about engagement’, in May, S. and Mumby, D. K. (Eds), Engaging organizational communication the-ory & research: Multiple perspectives, 1-14. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York:

Warner Books. Nalebuff, B. and Brandenburger, A. (1996). Coopetition - kooperativ konkurrieren:

Mit der Spieltheorie zum Unternehmenserfolg. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Nayak, A. (2008). ‘On the way to theory: A processual approach’. Organization Stud-

ies, 29 (2), 173-190. Nayak, A. and Chia, R. (2011). ‘Thinking becoming and emergence: Process philoso-

phy and organization studies’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization theory, 281-309. Bingley: Emerald.

Neurath, O. (1970). Foundations of the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chi-cago Press.

Newell, S. (2002). Managing knowledge work. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.

220 References

Newell, S., Robertson, M. and Swan, J. (2011). Enacting project management in bio-medical innovation projects: Project work as guesswork. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process organization studies. Corfu.

Newman, A. (2002). The correspondence theory of truth: An essay on the metaphysics of predication. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nicolini, D. (2011). ‘Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of tele-medicine’. Organization Science, 22 (3), 602-620.

Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (2003). ‘Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations’, in Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (Eds), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach, 3-31. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (Eds) (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Nonaka, I. (1994). ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’. Organi-zation Science, 5 (1), 14-37.

Nonaka, I. and Krogh, G. von (2009). ‘Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory’. Or-ganization Science, 20 (3), 635-652.

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ong, W. J. (1986). ‘Writing is a technology that restructures thought’, in Baumann, G.

(Ed), The written word: Literacy in transition, 23-50. New York, Oxford: Clar-endon Press, Oxford University Press.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). ‘Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations’. Organization Science, 11 (4), 404-428.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). ‘Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’. Organization Science, 13 (3), 249-273.

Orton, J. D. and Weick, K. E. (1990). ‘Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualiza-tion’. Academy of Management Review, 15 (2), 203-223.

Osei-Bryson, K.-M. and Ngwenyama, O. (2011). ‘Using decision tree modelling to support Peircian abduction in IS research: A systematic approach for generating and evaluating hypotheses for systematic theory development’. Information Sys-tems Journal, 21 (5), 407-440.

Outhwaite, W. (1983). ‘Toward a realist perspective’, in Morgan, G. (Ed), Beyond me-thod: Strategies for social research, 321-330. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

References 221

Parker, M. (1992). ‘Post-modern organizations or postmodern organization theory?’. Organization Studies, 13 (1), 1-17.

Parnell, J. A. and Menefee, M. L. (2007). ‘The view changes at the top: Resolving dif-ferences in managerial perspectives on strategy’. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 72 (2), 4-14.

Parsons, T. and Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. London: Routledge.

Partington, D. (Ed) (2003). Essential skills for management research. London: SAGE. Pedraja, L. G. (2002). ‘Whitehead, deconstruction, and postmodernism’, in Keller, C.

and Daniell, A. (Eds), Process and difference: Between cosmological and post-structuralist postmodernisms, 73-90. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Peirce, C. S. and Buchler, J. (2000). The philosophy of Peirce: Selected writings. Lon-don: Routledge.

Peirce, C. S. and Wiener, P. P. (1966). Selected writings: Values in a universe of chan-ce. New York: Dover.

Pelc, J. (Ed) (1979). Semiotics in Poland: 1894-1969. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pelz, D. C. (1978). ‘Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public

policy’, in Yinger, J. M. and Cutler, S. J. (Eds), Major social issues: A multidisci-plinary view, 346-357. New York: Free Press.

Pennings, J. M. (Ed) (1985). Organizational strategy and change. San Francisco: Jos-sey-Bass.

Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Pepper, S. C. (1961). ‘Whitehead's 'actual occasion'’. Tulane studies in philoso-phy/Tulane University, 10 (Studies in Whitehead's philosophy), 71-88.

Perloff, M. (2011). ‘Writing philosophy as poetry: Literary form in Wittgenstein’, in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, 714-728. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). ‘What is a processual analysis?’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13 (4), 337-348.

Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H. and Whittington, R. (Eds) (2002). Handbook of strategy and management. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pitman. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A re-

source dependence perspective. Hagerstow, New York: Harper & Row.

222 References

Piaget, J. (1937). La construction du réel chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Dela-chaux & Niestlé.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Lon-don: Routledge.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge. Pondy, L. R. (1978). ‘Leadership is a language game’, in McCall, M. W. and Lombar-

do, M. M. (Eds), Leadership: Where else can we go?, 87-99. Durham: Duke Uni-versity Press.

Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G. and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds) (1983). Organiza-tional symbolism. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Pondy, L. R. and Mitroff, I. I. (1979). ‘Beyond open system models of organization’. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 3-39.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. Popper, K. R. and Petersen, A. F. (2001). Die Welt des Parmenides: Der Ursprung des

europäischen Denkens. Munich: Piper. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and

competitors. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior per-

formance. New York: Free Press. Power, M. (1990). ‘Modernism, postmodernism and organization’, in Hassard, J. and

Pym, D. (Eds), The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new perspectives, 109-124. London: Routledge.

Pritchard, D. (2011). ‘Wittgenstein on scepticism’, in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, 523-549. New York, Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.

PROS (2011). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts and materiality in organization studies. Call for papers for the 3rd international symposium on process organiza-tion studies in Corfu in 2011. http://www.process-symposium.com/documents/2011cfp.pdf (accessed 17 January 2012).

Pugh, D. S. (1976). ‘The 'Aston' approach to the study of organizations’, in Hofstede, G. H. and Sami Kassem, M. (Eds), European contributions to organization the-ory, 62-78. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Pugh, D. S. (1983). ‘Studying organizational structure and process’, in Morgan, G. (Ed), Beyond method: Strategies for social research, 45-56. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Pugh, D. S. and Hickson, D. J. (1989). Writers on organizations. Newbury Park: SAGE.

References 223

Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Macdonald, K. M., Turner, C. and Lupton, T. (1963). ‘A conceptual scheme for organizational analysis’. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 8 (3), 289-315.

Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R. and Turner, C. (1968). ‘Dimensions of or-ganization structure’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13 (1), 65-105.

Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R. and Turner, C. (1969). ‘The context of or-ganization structures’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14 (1), 91-114.

Putnam, L. L. and Boys, S. (2006). ‘Revisiting metaphors of organizational communi-cation’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 541-576. London: SAGE.

Ramal, R. (1998). ‘Realism without empiricism: Wittgenstein and Whitehead (seminar

paper)’, in The Center for Process Studies (Ed), For the common good: 3rd in-ternational Whitehead conference. Claremont.

Rapoport, R. N. (1970). ‘Three dilemmas in action research’. Human Relations, 23 (6), 499-513.

Rasche, A. (2011). ‘Organizing Derrida organizing: Deconstruction and organization theory’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization theory, 251-280. Bingley: Emerald.

Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (Eds) (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE.

Reed, E. (1996). The necessity of experience. New Haven: Yale University Press. Reed, M. I. and Hughes, M. (Eds) (1992). Rethinking organization. London: SAGE. Reiter, N. (2007). ‘Work life balance: What DO you mean? The ethical ideology un-

derpinning appropriate application’. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (2), 273-294.

Rescher, N. (1996). Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Al-bany: State University of New York Press.

Rescher, N. (2000). Process philosophy: A survey of basic issues. Pittsburgh: Univer-sity of Pittsburgh Press.

Rescher, N. (2011). On certainty: And other philosophical essays on cognition. Frank-furt am Main, New Brunswick: Ontos, Transaction Books.

Reynolds, L. T. and Metzer, B. N. (1973). ‘The origins of divergent methodological stances in symbolic interactionism’. Sociological Quarterly, 14 (2), 189-199.

Rigby, D. and Bilodeau, B. (2007). ‘Bain's global 2007 management tools and trends survey’. Strategy & Leadership, 35 (5), 4-16.

224 References

Rigby, D. and Bilodeau, B. (2009). Management tools and trends 2009. http://www.bain.com/bainweb/PDFs/cms/Public/Management_Tools_2009.pdf (accessed 16 January 2012).

Rindova, V. P., Becerra, M. and Contardo, I. (2004). ‘Enacting competitive wars: Competitive activity, language games, and market consequences’. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4), 670-686.

Ringlstetter, M. J. (1988). Auf dem Weg zu einem evolutionären Management: Konver-gierende Tendenzen in der deutschsprachigen Führungs- bzw. Managementlehre. Munich: Kirsch.

Ringlstetter, M. J. (1992). Unternehmensentwicklung, Evolution und evolutionäres Management: Skizze eines organisationstheoretischen Bezugsrahmens. Mu-nich: Poeschel.

Ringlstetter, M. J. (1997). Organisation von Unternehmen und Unternehmensverbin-dungen: Einführung in die Gestaltung der Organisationsstruktur. Mu-nich: Oldenbourg.

Ringlstetter, M. J., Henzler, H. A. and Mirow, M. (Eds) (2003). Perspektiven der stra-tegischen Unternehmensführung: Theorien - Konzepte - Anwendungen. Wies-baden: Gabler.

Robbins, S. P. (1979). Organizational behavior: Concepts and controversies. Engle-wood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Robyn, T., Hardy, C. and Sargent, L. (2007). Artifacts in interaction: The production and politics of boundary objects. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1309582 (accessed 16 January 2012).

Rogelberg, S. G. (Ed) (2002). Handbook of research methods in industrial and organ-izational psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (2012). ‘'Life is in the transitions': Revisiting William James's pragmatism’, in Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (Eds), Revisiting pragmatism: William James in the new millenium, 9-16. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (Eds) (2012). Revisiting pragmatism: William James in the new millenium. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

Roos, J., Krogh, G. von and Yip, G. (1994). ‘An epistemology of globalizing firms’. International Business Review, 3 (4), 395-409.

Rorty, R. (1961). ‘Pragmatism, categories, and language’. The Philosophical Review, 70 (2), 197-223.

Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-

sity Press. Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

References 225

Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rosenthal, S. B. (2003). ‘Pragmatic process philosophy: A uniquely powerful para-digm’, in Debrock, G. (Ed), Process pragmatism: Essays on a quiet philosophical revolution, 11-24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Ross, J. M. (2010). ‘Informatics creativity: A role for abductive reasoning?’. Commu-nications of the ACM, 53 (2), 144-148.

Rouleau, L. and Clegg, S. (1992). ‘Postmodernism and postmodernity in organization analysis’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5 (1), 8-25.

Royer, I. and Langley, A. (2008). ‘Linking rationality, politics, and routines in organ-izational decision making’, in Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 250-270. New York, Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.

Royle, N. (Ed) (2000). Deconstructions: A user's guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D. E. and Teece, D. J. (1991). ‘Strategic management and

economics’. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special issue: Fundamental re-search issues in strategy and economics), 5-29.

Runkel, P. J. and Runkel, M. (1984). A guide to usage for writers and students in the social sciences. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.

Rustemeyer, H. and Buchmann, C. (2010). ‘Erfolgsfaktor Work-Life Balance bei der Unternehmensberatung A.T. Kearney’, in Kaiser, S. and Ringlstetter, M. J. (Eds), Work-Life Balance: Erfolgversprechende Konzepte und Instrumente für Extrem-jobber, 165-179. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson. Salimath, M. S. and Jones, R. J. (2011). ‘Scientific entrepreneurial management: Bri-

colage, bootstrapping, and the quest for efficiencies’. Journal of Busi-ness & Management, 17 (1), 85-103.

Sandberg, J. and Alvesson, M. (2011). ‘Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization?’. Organization, 18 (1), 23-44.

Saussure, F. de (1974). Course in general linguistics. London: Fontana Collins. Savickey, B. (2011). ‘Wittgenstein's use of examples’, in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M.

(Eds), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, 667-696. New York, Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.

Schaff, A. (1979). ‘Vague words’, in Pelc, J. (Ed), Semiotics in Poland: 1894-1969, 227-239. Dordrecht: Reidel.

226 References

Schatzki, T. R. (2001). ‘Introduction: Practice theory’, in Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. von (Eds), The practice turn in contemporary theory, 1-14. New York: Routledge.

Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitu-tion of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univer-sity Press.

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. von (Eds) (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge.

Scherer, A. (2005). ‘Modes of explanation in organization theory’, in Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 310-344. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmidt, S. J. (Ed) (1991). Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Schmidt, S. J. (1991a). ‘Der Radikale Konstruktivismus: Ein neues Paradigma im in-terdisziplinären Diskurs’, in Schmidt, S. J. (Ed), Der Diskurs des Radikalen Kon-struktivismus, 11-88. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Schmidt, S. J. (1991b). ‘Vorbemerkung’, in Schmidt, S. J. (Ed), Der Diskurs des Radi-kalen Konstruktivismus, 7-9. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Schmidt, S. J. (1992). ‘Vom Text zum Literatursystem. Skizze eine konstruktivisti-schen (empirischen) Literaturwissenschaft’, in von Foerster, H. (Ed), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus, 147-166. Munich: Piper.

Schneider, H. W. (1963). A history of American philosophy. New York: Columbia Uni-versity Press.

Schobert, D. B. (2007). ‘Grundlagen zum Verständnis von Work-Life Balance’, in Ess-linger, A. S. (Ed), Erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Work-Life Balance in Organisati-onen: Strategien, Konzepte, Maßnahmen, 19-33. Wiesbaden: DUV.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schubert, H.-J. (2010). Pragmatismus zur Einführung: Kreativität, Handlung, Deduk-tion, Induktion, Abduktion, Chicago School, Sozialreform, Sympolische Interak-tion. Hamburg: Junius.

Schulenberg, U. (2012). ‘Poets, partial stories, and the earth of things: William James and the worldliness of pragmatism’, in Rohr, S. and Strube, M. (Eds), Revisiting pragmatism: William James in the new millenium, 103-122. Heidelberg: Univer-sitätsverlag Winter.

Seamon, D. and Zajonc, A. (Eds) (1998). Goethe's way of science: A phenomenology of nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.

References 227

Sergiovanni, T. J. and Corbally, J. E. (Eds) (1986). Leadership and organizational cul-ture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Shapira, Z. (Ed) (1997). Organizational decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Shook, J. R. (2003). ‘Editorial foreword’, in Debrock, G. (Ed), Process pragmatism: Essays on a quiet philosophical revolution, xi-xi. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. Lon-don, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Shotter, J. (2004). ‘Expressing and legitimating 'actionable knowledge' from within 'the moment of acting'’. Concepts & Transformation, 9 (2), 205-229.

Shotter, J. (2005). ‘Goethe and the refiguring of intellectual inquiry: From ‘aboutness’-thinking to ‘withness’-thinking in everyday life’. Janus Head, 8 (1), 132-158.

Shotter, J. (2006). ‘Understanding process from within: An argument for 'withness'-thinking’. Organization Studies, 27 (4), 585-604.

Shotter, J. (2008). Conversational realities revisited: Life, language, body and world. Chagrin Falls: Taos Institute Publications.

Shotter, J. (2010). ‘Adopting a process orientation…in practice: Chiasmic relations, language, and embodiment in a living world’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemaking, and organizing, 70-101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shotter, J. (2011). Getting it: Withness-thinking and the dialogical…in practice. New York: Hampton Press.

Shotter, J. (2012). ‘More than cool reason: 'Withness-thinking' or 'systemic thinking' and 'thinking about systems'’. International Journal of Collaborative Practices, 3 (1), 1-13.

Shotter, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2011). ‘Theory as therapy: Wittgensteinian reminders for reflective theorizing in organization and management theory’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization theory, 311-342. Bingley: Emerald.

Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. http://www.aspresolver.com/aspresolver.asp?SOTH;S10020832 (accessed 16 September 2013).

Simmel, G. (1969). Conflict. New York: Free Press. Simmel, G. (1980). Essays on interpretation in social science. Totowa: Row-

man & Littlefield. Simondon, G. (1992). ‘The genesis of the individual’, in Crary, J. and Kwinter, S.

(Eds), Incorporations, 296-319. New York: Zone Books. Simon, H. A. (1957a). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes

in administrative organization. New York: Free Press.

228 References

Simon, H. A. (1957b). Models of man: Social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.

Simon, H. A. (1991). ‘Bounded rationality and organizational learning’. Organization Science, 2 (1), 125-134.

Sims, H. P. and Gioia, D. A. (Eds) (1986). The thinking organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Smart, B. (1990). ‘Modernity, postmodernity and the present’, in Turner, B. S. (Ed), Theories of modernity and postmodernity, 14-30. London, Newbury Park: SAGE.

Southgate, B. C. (2003). Postmodernism in history: Fear or freedom? London, New York: Routledge.

Sowa, J. F. (2002). Signs, processes, and language games: Foundations for ontology. Unpublished paper available at the library of the Center for Process Stud-ies. Claremont.

Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009). ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’. Strategic Organization, 7 (2), 223-232.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1969). Laws of form. London: Allen & Unwin. Spender, J. C. (1989). Industry recipes. Cambridge, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Spender, J. C. (1993). ‘Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the

concept and its strategic implications’. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 37-41.

Spender, J. C. (1996a). ‘Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications’, in Moingeon, B. and Edmondson, A. C. (Eds), Organizational learning and competitive advantage, 56-73. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Spender, J. C. (1996b). ‘Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: Three con-cepts in search of a theory’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9 (1), 63-78.

Spender, J. C. and Grant, R. M. (1996). ‘Knowledge and the firm: Overview’. Strate-gic Management Journal, 17 (Special issue: Knowledge and the firm), 5-9.

Starbuck, W. H. (1985). ‘Acting first and thinking later: Theory versus reality in stra-tegic change’, in Pennings, J. M. (Ed), Organizational strategy and change, 336-372. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). ‘Institutional ecology, 'translations' and bound-ary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zo-ology, 1907-39’. Social Studies of Science, 19 (3), 387-420.

Staw, B. M. (Ed) (1979). Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press.

References 229

Staw, B. M. and Salancik, G. R. (Eds) (1977). New directions in organizational behav-ior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.

Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Steier, F. (1991). ‘Introduction: Research as self-reflexivity, self-reflexivity as social

process’, in Steier, F. (Ed), Research and reflexivity, 1-11. London, Newbury Park: SAGE.

Steier, F. (Ed) (1991). Research and reflexivity. London, Newbury Park: SAGE. Stenfors, S., Tanner, L. and Haapalinna, I. (2004). ‘Executive use of strategy tools:

Building shared understanding through boundary objects’. Frontiers of E-Business Research 2004, 635-643.

Stichweh, R. (1994). Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen: Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Stone, G. P., Maines, D. R., Farberman, H. A., Stone, G. I. and Denzin, N. K. (1974). ‘On methodology and craftsmanship in the criticism of sociological perspec-tives’. American Sociological Review, 39 (3), 456-463.

Strategic Management Society (2012a). Interest groups. http://strategicmanagement.net/ig/index.php (accessed 17 January 2012).

Strategic Management Society (2012b). Strategy process interest group: Domain sta-tement. http://strategicmanagement.net/ig/strategy_process.php (accessed 17 Ja-nuary 2012).

Strati, A. (2003). ‘Aesthetic understanding and tacit knowledge’, in Nicolini, D., Gher-ardi, S. and Yanow, D. (Eds), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based ap-proach, 53-75. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Sutcliffe, K. M. and Weick, K. E. (2008). ‘Information overload revisited’, in Hodg-kinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making, 56-75. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sutton, R. I. and Staw, B. M. (1995). ‘What theory is not’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3), 371-384.

Taylor, B. C. (2005). ‘Postmodern theory’, in May, S. and Mumby, D. K. (Eds), En-

gaging organizational communication theory & research: Multiple perspectives, 113-140. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Taylor, J. R. and van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. New York: Psychology Press.

Teece, D. J. (Ed) (1987). The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innova-tion and renewal. Cambridge: Harper & Row.

Thayer, H. S. (1973). Meaning and action: A study of American pragmatism. Indian-apolis, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

230 References

The Center for Process Studies (Ed) (1998). For the common good: 3rd international Whitehead conference. Conference proceedings. Claremont.

Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

Thompson, J. D. (1956). ‘On building an administrative science’. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 1 (1), 102-111.

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administra-tive theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Thurow, L. C. (1999). Creating wealth: The new rules for individuals, companies, and countries in a knowledge-based economy. London: Nicholas Brealey.

Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century. New York: Bantam Books.

Toulmin, S. E. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. New York: Free Press.

Tsoukas, H. (1992). ‘Postmodernism, reflexive rationalism and organizational studies: A reply to Martin Parker’. Organization Studies, 13 (4), 643-649.

Tsoukas, H. (1994). ‘Refining common sense: Types of knowledge in management studies’. Journal of Management Studies, 31 (6), 761-780.

Tsoukas, H. (1996). ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach’. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Special issue: Knowledge and the firm), 11-25.

Tsoukas, H. (1998). ‘The word and the world: A critique of representationalism in ma-nagement research’. International Journal of Public Administration, 21 (5), 781-817.

Tsoukas, H. (Ed) (2005). Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. (2005a). ‘Do we really understand tacit knowledge?’, in Tsoukas, H. (Ed), Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemology, 141-161. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. (2005b). ‘Introduction: Professor Bleent, the floon beetle, and organiza-tional epistemology’, in Tsoukas, H. (Ed), Complex knowledge: Studies in organ-izational epistemology, 1-9. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. (2005c). ‘The tyranny of light: The temptations and the paradoxes of the information society’, in Tsoukas, H. (Ed), Complex knowledge: Studies in organ-izational epistemology, 13-38. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. (2005d). ‘What is organizational foresight and how can it be developed?’, in Tsoukas, H. (Ed), Complex knowledge: Studies in organizational epistemol-ogy, 263-279. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

References 231

Tsoukas, H. (2009a). ‘A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in or-ganizations’. Organization Science, 20 (6), 941-957.

Tsoukas, H. (2009b). ‘Craving for generality and small-N studies: A Wittgensteinian approach towards the epistemology of the particular in organization and man-agement studies’, in Buchanan, D. A. and Bryman, A. (Eds), The SAGE hand-book of organizational research methods, 285-301. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). ‘On organizational becoming: Rethinking organiza-tional change’. Organization Science, 13 (5), 567-582.

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2011a). ‘Introduction: Why philosophy matters to organiza-tion theory’, in Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds), Philosophy and organization the-ory, 1-21. Bingley: Emerald.

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (Eds) (2011b). Philosophy and organization theory. Bing-ley: Emerald.

Tsoukas, H. and Cummings, S. (1997). ‘Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies’. Organization Studies, 18 (4), 655-683.

Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (2002). ‘The conduct of strategy research’, in Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H. and Whittington, R. (Eds), Handbook of strategy and man-agement, 411-435. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds) (2005). The Oxford handbook of organization the-ory. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsoukas, H. and Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Organizations as knowledge systems: Knowledge, learning and dynamic capabilities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tsoukas, H. and Papoulias, D. B. (1996). ‘Understanding social reforms: A conceptual analysis’. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47 (7), 853-863.

Turner, B. (1990). ‘The rise of organizational symbolism’, in Hassard, J. and Pym, D. (Eds), The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new per-spectives, 83-96. London: Routledge.

Turner, B. (1991). Rethinking organizations: Organizational learning in the ninetees. Paper presented at the EFMD Research Conference. Isida, Palermo.

Turner, B. S. (Ed) (1990). Theories of modernity and postmodernity. London, New-bury Park: SAGE.

Turner, S. P. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge and presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Turner, S. P. (2006). ‘The philosophy of the social sciences in organizational studies’, in Clegg, S., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. (Eds), The SAGE hand-book of organization studies, 409-424. London: SAGE.

232 References

Vaihinger, H. (1876). ‘Über den Ursprung des Wortes 'Erkenntnistheorie'’. Philosophi-sche Monatshefte, xii, 84-90.

Vaihinger, H. (1913). Die Philosophie des als Ob: System der theoretischen, prakti-schen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Mit einem Anhang über Kant und Nietzsche. Berlin: Reut-her & Reichard.

van de Ven, A. H. (1989). ‘Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory’. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 486-489.

van de Ven, A. H. (1992). ‘Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note’. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Special issue: Strategy process: Managing corporate self-renewal), 169-188.

van de Ven, A. H. and Poole, M. S. (2005). ‘Alternative approaches for studying or-ganizational change’. Organization Studies, 26 (9), 1377-1404.

van der Heijden, K. (2007). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chiches-ter: Wiley.

van Gennip, K. (2011). ‘Wittgenstein on intuition, rule-following, and certainty: Ex-changes with Brouwer and Russell’, in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of Wittgenstein, 570-594. New York, Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive sci-ence and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Vico, G. (1969). De antiquissima Italorum sapientia. Rome: Signorelli. Vidaillet, B. (2008). ‘When 'decision outcomes' are not the outcomes of decisions’, in

Hodgkinson, G. P. and Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of organiza-tional decision making, 418-436. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Villey, P. (Ed) (1922). Les essais de Michel de Montaigne. Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan. von Foerster, H. (1985). ‘Das Konstruieren einer Wirklichkeit’, in Watzlawick, P. (Ed),

Die erfundene Wirklichkeit: Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus, 39-60. Munich: Piper.

von Foerster, H. (1991). ‘Erkenntnistheorien und Selbstorganisation’, in Schmidt, S. J. (Ed), Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus, 133-158. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

von Foerster, H. (Ed) (1992). Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. Munich: Piper. von Foerster, H. (1992). ‘Entdecken oder Erfinden. Wie läßt sich Verstehen verste-

hen?’, in von Foerster, H. (Ed), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus, 41-88. Mu-nich: Piper.

References 233

von Glasersfeld, E. (1985a). ‘Einführung in den radikalen Konstruktivismus’, in Watz-lawick, P. (Ed), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit: Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus, 16-38. Munich: Piper.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1985b). ‘Reconstructing the concept of knowledge’. Archives de Psychologie, 53, 91-101.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1991a). ‘Abschied von der Objektivität’, in Watzlawick, P. and Krieg, P. (Eds), Das Auge des Betrachters: Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus: Fest-schrift für Heinz von Foerster, 17-30. Munich, Zurich: Piper.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1991b). ‘Knowing without metaphysics. Aspects of the radical constructivist position’, in Steier, F. (Ed), Research and reflexivity, 12-29. Lon-don, Newbury Park: SAGE.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1991c). ‘Siegener Gespräche über Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Ernst von Glasersfeld im Gespräch mit NIKOL (1982, 1984)’, in Schmidt, S. J. (Ed), Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus, 401-440. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1992a). ‘Einführung in den radikalen Konstruktivismus’, in von Glasersfeld, E. and Köck, W. K. (Eds), Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit: Arbei-ten zum radikalen Konstruktivismus, 198-212. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1992b). ‘Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und des Begriffs der Ob-jektivität’, in von Foerster, H. (Ed), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus, 9-40. Munich: Piper.

von Glasersfeld, E. and Köck, W. K. (Eds) (1992). Wissen, Sprache und Wirklichkeit: Arbeiten zum radikalen Konstruktivismus. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

Walley, K. (2007). ‘Coopetition’. International Studies of Manage-

ment & Organization, 37 (2), 11-31. Walsh, J. P. and Huff, A. S. (Eds) (1997). Organizational learning and strategic man-

agement. Greenwich: JAI Press. Warriner, C. K., Hall, R. H. and McKelvey, B. (1981). ‘The comparative description of

organizations: A research note and invitation’. Organization Studies, 2 (2), 173-175.

Waterman, R. H. (1990). Adhocracy: The power to change. New York: Norton. Watson, I. D. (2003). Applying knowledge management: Techniques for building cor-

porate memories. Amsterdam, Boston: Morgan Kaufmann. Watzlawick, P. (1976). Wie wirklich ist die Wirklichkeit?: Wahn, Täuschung, Verste-

hen. Munich: Piper. Watzlawick, P. (Ed) (1985). Die erfundene Wirklichkeit: Wie wissen wir, was wir zu

wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus. Munich: Piper.

234 References

Watzlawick, P. (1985). ‘Vorwort’, in Watzlawick, P. (Ed), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit: Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus, 9-11. Munich: Piper.

Watzlawick, P. (1991). ‘Einleitung’, in Watzlawick, P. and Krieg, P. (Eds), Das Auge des Betrachters: Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus: Festschrift für Heinz von Foerster, 7-11. Munich, Zurich: Piper.

Watzlawick, P. (1992). ‘Wirklichkeitsanpassung oder angepaßte 'Wirklichkeit'? Kon-struktivismus und Psychotherapie’, in von Foerster, H. (Ed), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus, 89-107. Munich: Piper.

Watzlawick, P. and Krieg, P. (Eds) (1991). Das Auge des Betrachters: Beiträge zum Konstruktivismus: Festschrift für Heinz von Foerster. Munich, Zurich: Piper.

Weber, M. and Desmond, W. (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought. Vol. 1. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

Weber, M. and Desmond, W. (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Whiteheadian process thought. Vol. 2. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Weick, K. E. (1974). ‘Middle range theories of social systems’. Behavioral Science,

19 (6), 357-367. Weick, K. E. (1976). ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’. Adminis-

trative Science Quarterly, 21 (1), 1-19. Weick, K. E. (1977). ‘Enactment processes in organizations’, in Staw, B. M. and Sal-

ancik, G. R. (Eds), New directions in organizational behavior, 267-300. Chicago: St. Clair Press.

Weick, K. E. (1979a). ‘Cognitive processes in organizations’, in Staw, B. M. (Ed), Re-search in organizational behavior, 41-74. Greenwich: JAI Press.

Weick, K. E. (1979b). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Weick, K. E. (1985). ‘Sources of order in underorganized systems: Themes in recent

organizational theory’, in Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed), Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution, 106-136. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Weick, K. E. (1988). ‘Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations’. Journal of Manage-ment Studies, 25 (4), 305-317.

Weick, K. E. (1989a). ‘Organized improvisation: 20 years of organizing’. Communica-tion Studies, 40 (4), 516-531.

Weick, K. E. (1989b). ‘Theory construction as disciplined imagination’. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 516-531.

Weick, K. E. (1995a). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

References 235

Weick, K. E. (1995b). ‘What theory is not, theorizing is’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (3), 385-390.

Weick, K. E. (1996). ‘Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies’. Admin-istrative Science Quarterly, 41 (2), 301-313.

Weick, K. E. (2010). ‘The poetics of process: Theorizing the ineffable in organization studies’, in Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (Eds), Process, sensemaking, and organiz-ing, 102-111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weick, K. E. and Bougon, M. G. (1986). ‘Organizations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure’, in Sims, H. P. and Gioia, D. A. (Eds), The thinking organization, 102-135. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Weick, K. E. and Daft, R. L. (1983). ‘The effectiveness of interpretation systems’, in Cameron, K. S. (Ed), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple model, 71-93. New York: Academic Press.

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005). ‘Organizing and the process of sensemaking’. Organization Science, 16 (4), 409-421.

Welsch, W. (1987). Unsere postmoderne Moderne. Weinheim: VCH. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cam-

bridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E. (2000). ‘Communities of practice and social learning systems’. Organiza-

tion, 7 (2), 225-246. Wenger, E. (2003). ‘Communities of practice and social learning systems’, in Nicolini,

D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (Eds), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach, 76-99. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). ‘A resource-based view of the firm’. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171-180.

Westwood, R. I. (1987). ‘Social criticism: A social critical practice applied to a dis-course on participation’, in Mangham, I. L. (Ed), Organization analysis and de-velopment: A social construction of organizational behaviour, 167-205. Chiches-ter: Wiley.

Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (2001). ‘Language/organization: Introduction’, in Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (Eds), The language of organization, 1-19. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Westwood, R. I. and Linstead, S. A. (Eds) (2001). The language of organization. Lon-don, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Wexler, M. N. (1983). ‘Pragmatism, interactionism and dramatism. Interpreting the symbol in organizations’, in Pondy, L. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G. and Dandridge, T. C. (Eds), Organizational symbolism, 237-253. Greenwich: JAI Press.

236 References

Whipp, R. (2006). ‘Managing strategic change’, in Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of strategy: A strategy overview and competitive strategy, 729-758. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York: Free Press. Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. Gifford lectures

delivered in the University of Edinburgh during the session 1927-28. New York: Free Press.

Whitehead, A. N. (1985). Symbolism: Its meaning and effect. Barbour-Page lectures at the University of Virginia, 1927. New York: Fordham University Press.

White, S. K. (1988). The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice and mod-ernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whittington, R. (1992). ‘Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency’. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (6), 693-712.

Whittington, R. (2006). ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’. Organiza-tion Studies, 27 (5), 613-634.

Whittington, R. (2010). ‘Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice’, in Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E. (Eds), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, 109-126. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Wiebe, E., Suddaby, R. and Foster, W. M. (2011). The temporal-relational nature of objects. Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on process organiza-tion studies. Corfu.

Willmott, H. (1990). ‘Beyond paradigmatic closure in organizational enquiry’, in Has-sard, J. and Pym, D. (Eds), The theory and philosophy of organizations: Critial issues and new perspectives, 44-60. London: Routledge.

Wilson, B. J. (2008). ‘Language games of reciprocity’. Journal of Economic Behav-ior & Organization, 68 (2), 365-377.

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf, Ran-dom House.

Winter, S. G. (1987). ‘Knowledge and competence as strategic assets’, in Teece, D. J. (Ed), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and re-newal, 159-184. Cambridge: Harper & Row.

References 237

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Paul, Trench, Trub-ner & Co.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Preliminary studies for the 'Philosophical investigations' gen-

erally known as 'The blue and brown books'. Oxford: Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures & conversations on aesthetics, psychology and reli-

gious belief: Compiled from notes taken by Yorick Smythies, Rush Rhees and Ja-mes Taylor. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell. Wittgenstein, L. (1971). Über Gewißheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. Chicago, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Univer-

sity of Chicago Press. Wood, M. (2002). ‘Mind the gap? A processual reconsideration of organizational

knowledge’. Organization, 9 (1), 151-171. Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. Chichester, London: Ellis Horwood, Ta-

vistock Publications. Yanow, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2009). ‘What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological

account’. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (8), 1339-1364. Yazdani, N., Murad, H. S. and Abbas, R. Z. (2011). ‘From modernity to postmoder-

nity: A historical discourse on Western civilization’. International Journal of Business & Social Science, 2 (11), 249-256.

Yinger, J. M. and Cutler, S. J. (Eds) (1978). Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view. New York: Free Press.

Younis, R. A. (unpubl.). The 'end of the grand metanarratives of progress'? Unpub-lished paper available at the library of the Center for Process Studies. Claremont.

Zahra, S. A. and Newey, L. R. (2009). ‘Maximizing the impact of organization sci-

ence: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields’. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (6), 1059-1075.

Zhou, X. (1997). ‘Organizational decision making as rule following’, in Shapira, Z. (Ed), Organizational decision making, 257-281. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

Ziman, J. M. (1987). ‘The problem of 'problem choice'’. Minerva, 25 (1-2), 92-106.

238 References

Zsolnai, L. (Ed) (2006). Interdisciplinary yearbook of business ethics. Oxford: Lang. zu Knyphausen, D. (1988). Unternehmungen als evolutionsfähige Systeme: Überle-

gungen zu einem evolutionären Konzept für die Organisationstheorie. Mu-nich: Kirsch.