Reducing Fleet Costs through Transportation Safety Lessons Learned Lynelle Bautista VP, Strategic Accounts Cartasite Inc Cell: (303) 886-5071 Email: [email protected]@cartasite.com.

Reducing Fleet Costs through Transportation Safety

Lessons Learned

Lynelle Bautista VP, Strategic Accounts

Cartasite IncCell: (303) 886-5071

Email: [email protected]

2015: It’s all about reducing costs.

How do you reduce your biggest risks in today’s

environment?

Those who work in the Permian Basin are 2.5 times more likely to die in a vehicle crash than

the state average.

In 2014: • 424 people died in traffic accidents (+16% from 2013)• 5,029 accidents overall in which someone was killed or seriously

injured (+14% from 2013)

What is your Transportation Safety Program?

• Management champion / safety committee• Goals / Metrics• Risk Assessment / Driving JSA• Vehicle Specifications• Driver Record Review• Policy on use of Phone / Radios / GPS • Standards for New Driver• Guideline for Fatigue Management• Driver Training• Inspect/Maintenance Program• Foul Weather Travel Restrictions• Journey Management Plans• Project Transportation Plans• Transportation Safety Specialists• In-Vehicle Monitoring System

If you don’t have an IVMS system yet

Implement Journey Management basics

Begin planning

Understand & quantify your pain. Collect MVI, mileage, idling data Determine actual regulatory

requirements Identify customer and/ or

insurance pressures

If you have an IVMS System

Reduce Program Costs Maximize Value Reduce fuel usage

Reduce crashes

Insurance discounts

Optimize costs of current program

Seek alternative solutions?

Maximizing Value of Your IVMS

Is your program really changing behavior & reducing

crashes?

• $24,000 – Non injury MVI

• $128,000 – MVI with minor injury

• $3.8 million – MVI with fatalityh

higher MVI Rates

Case Studies & Lessons Learned

1. No IVMS Strategy

2. IVMS Plan but no ongoing attention

3. IVMS Plan with continual attention

Case Study 1

No IVMS Strategy

“1-800 Bad Driver” program

• Communicated extreme events to supervisors

• Inconsistent communication to drivers• No clear expectations

• Lots of investment of time & resources

• No change in behavior

Case Study 1

No IVMS Strategy

Case Study 2

Initial IVMS Plan, No Follow Up

• In 2012, distracted by growth.• After 6 months of worsening behavior,

leadership re-engaged.

Company B, a major Oil & Gas Service Provider, provided good initial communication of a safety-focused program.

Case Study 2

Behavior can improve at any time.

Case Study 3

Solid IVMS Program with Continual Engagement

Companies C & D, major Oil & Gas Operating Companies, provided good initial communication of a safety-focused program.

• Safety-focused plan• Good initial communication• Continual support & leadership

Company CSolid IVMS Program with Continual

Engagement

Company CSolid IVMS Program with Continual

Engagement

Continual Adjustments to Program Yields Continuous Improvements

IVMS: Immediate Measurable Results

Company D

IVMS: Immediate Measurable Results

Reduction in Motor Vehicle Crash Rates

• 55% Reduction in on road crash rates Year 1• Continual reduction year over year over next (4) years

Year 1+

Company D

What did Company C & D do to maximize the benefits from their IVMS solution?

WEEKLY SCORECARDSAUDIBLE ALERTS

REAL TIME NOTIFICATIONS

TRIP REPORTS

Optimize your current Transportation Safety Program

Optimize your IVMS system – reduce costs, maximize value

Prepare for the next cycle

Now what?There is much to do

1123 Auraria Parkway, Suite 200Denver, CO 80204

1-888-312-1616303-865-3140

[email protected]

CONTACT US Lynelle BautistaVP of Strategic Accounts

[email protected]