Food & Beverage Using Supel™ QuE Z-Sep+ QuEChERS and an SLB®-5ms GC Column Reduced Fat Interference with Analysis of Pesticides in Avocados The health benefits of avocado are associated with its high content of healthy fat, fiber, vitamins and minerals. Avocado consumption in the United States has steadily grown, with sources of the fruit being both domestic and imported. 1 The fat content of avocado is typically in the range of 10-15%, and this can pose a special analytical challenge when doing pesticide residue analysis. If fat is not removed from sample extracts, it can result in elevated detection limits and contamination of GC and LC systems. QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe) is a very popular method for the extraction and cleanup of fruit and vegetable samples for pesticide residue analysis. 2-4 The extraction step uses acetonitrile and a salting out effect (with MgSO 4 ). Cleanup is then accomplished using dispersive SPE (dSPE) followed by a centrifuge step prior to analysis. Sorbent choices for cleanup include: • PSA (primary-secondary amine) – for removal of polar pigments, sugars, and organic acids • Graphitized carbon black – for removal of chlorophyll and carotenoids • C18 – for removal of lipids and non-polar components • Zirconia – for removal of fatty components Our Supel QuE Z-Sep+ material consist of both C18 and zirconia bonded to the same silica particles. The C18 binds fats through hydrophobic interaction, while the zirconia acts as a Lewis acid, attracting compounds with electron donating groups, such as the hydroxyl (-OH) groups in mono- and diglycerides. Experimental Two cleanup sorbents, Z-Sep+ and PSA/C18, were compared for their effectiveness to remove fats from avocado extracts prior to GC-MS/ SIM analysis for pesticides. The extraction and cleanup procedures used are summarized in Table 1. Multiple replicates of both unspiked and spiked (20 ng/g with a mixture of hydrophobic and polar pesticides) avocado samples were processed. All extracts were then analyzed directly by GC-MS (SIM mode) using large volume injection (LVI). Quantitation was done using a calibration curve prepared with matrix-matched standards. Table 1. Extraction and Cleanup Procedure 1. Place 3 g of homogenized avocado sample into a 50 mL centrifuge tube (Cat. No. 55248-U) 2. Add 25 mL acetonitrile, mix for 1 min 3. Add contents of Acetate Extraction Tube (Cat. No. 55234-U), mix for 1 min 4. Centrifuge samples for 5 min 5. Transfer 3 mL of step 4 supernatant into a Z-Sep+ Cleanup Tube (Cat. No. 55296-U), mix, centrifuge, then transfer 1 mL of the supernatant into a vial for GC analysis 6. Transfer 3 mL of step 4 supernatant into PSA/C18 Cleanup Tube (Cat. No. 55229-U), mix, centrifuge, then transfer 1 mL of the supernatant into a vial for GC analysis 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 None PSA/C18 Z-Sep+ Residue Weight (g) Cleanup Sorbent Average from 3 Replicates Figure 1. Avocado Extracts after Cleanup. Figure 2. Amount of Matrix Residue Remaining Results & Discussion Matrix Removal Less color was observed in the extract cleaned with Z-Sep+ (Figure 1). This is an indicator that this sorbent removes more pigment than PSA/ C18. Gravimetric analysis was also performed on several extracts to determine the weight of matrix residue remaining in the supernatants (Figure 2). This includes extracts where no cleanup was performed. As depicted, less unwanted matrix residue remains in the extract after cleanup with Z-Sep+ sorbent.
2
Embed
Reduced Fat Interference with Analysis of ... - Mikro+Polo
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Food & Beverage
Using Supel™ QuE Z-Sep+ QuEChERS and an SLB®-5ms GC Column
Reduced Fat Interference with Analysis of Pesticides in Avocados
The health benefits of avocado are associated with its high content of healthy fat, fiber, vitamins and minerals. Avocado consumption in the United States has steadily grown, with sources of the fruit being both domestic and imported.1 The fat content of avocado is typically in the range of 10-15%, and this can pose a special analytical challenge when doing pesticide residue analysis. If fat is not removed from sample extracts, it can result in elevated detection limits and contamination of GC and LC systems.
QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe) is a very popular method for the extraction and cleanup of fruit and vegetable samples for pesticide residue analysis.2-4 The extraction step uses acetonitrile and a salting out effect (with MgSO4). Cleanup is then accomplished using dispersive SPE (dSPE) followed by a centrifuge step prior to analysis. Sorbent choices for cleanup include:
• PSA (primary-secondary amine) – for removal of polar pigments, sugars, and organic acids
• Graphitized carbon black – for removal of chlorophyll and carotenoids
• C18 – for removal of lipids and non-polar components
• Zirconia – for removal of fatty components
Our Supel QuE Z-Sep+ material consist of both C18 and zirconia bonded to the same silica particles. The C18 binds fats through hydrophobic interaction, while the zirconia acts as a Lewis acid, attracting compounds with electron donating groups, such as the hydroxyl (-OH) groups in mono- and diglycerides.
ExperimentalTwo cleanup sorbents, Z-Sep+ and PSA/C18, were compared for their effectiveness to remove fats from avocado extracts prior to GC-MS/SIM analysis for pesticides. The extraction and cleanup procedures used are summarized in Table 1. Multiple replicates of both unspiked and spiked (20 ng/g with a mixture of hydrophobic and polar pesticides) avocado samples were processed. All extracts were then analyzed directly by GC-MS (SIM mode) using large volume injection (LVI). Quantitation was done using a calibration curve prepared with matrix-matched standards.
Table 1. Extraction and Cleanup Procedure
1. Place 3 g of homogenized avocado sample into a 50 mL centrifuge tube (Cat. No. 55248-U)
2. Add 25 mL acetonitrile, mix for 1 min
3. Add contents of Acetate Extraction Tube (Cat. No. 55234-U), mix for 1 min
4. Centrifuge samples for 5 min
5. Transfer 3 mL of step 4 supernatant into a Z-Sep+ Cleanup Tube (Cat. No. 55296-U), mix, centrifuge, then transfer 1 mL of the supernatant into a vial for GC analysis
6. Transfer 3 mL of step 4 supernatant into PSA/C18 Cleanup Tube (Cat. No. 55229-U), mix, centrifuge, then transfer 1 mL of the supernatant into a vial for GC analysis
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
None PSA/C18 Z-Sep+
Resi
due
Wei
ght (
g)
Cleanup Sorbent
Average from 3 Replicates
Figure 1. Avocado Extracts after Cleanup.
Figure 2. Amount of Matrix Residue Remaining
Results & Discussion
Matrix Removal Less color was observed in the extract cleaned with Z-Sep+ (Figure 1). This is an indicator that this sorbent removes more pigment than PSA/C18. Gravimetric analysis was also performed on several extracts to determine the weight of matrix residue remaining in the supernatants (Figure 2). This includes extracts where no cleanup was performed. As depicted, less unwanted matrix residue remains in the extract after cleanup with Z-Sep+ sorbent.
Food & Beverage
Order/Customer Service (800) 325-3010 • Fax (800) 325-5052 Technical Service (800) 325-5832 • sigma-aldrich.com/techservice Development/Custom Manufacturing Inquiries (800) 244-1173 Safety-related Information sigma-aldrich.com/safetycenter
Visit our Food and Beverage/Pesticides resources, sigma-aldrich.com/food-pesticides
Featured and Related ProductsDescription Qty. Cat. No.Supel QuE QuEChERS ProductsAcetate Extraction Tube, 12 mL 50 55234-UCitrate Extraction Tube, 12 mL 50 55227-UCitrate/Sodium Bicarbonate Extraction Tube, 12 mL 50 55237-UZ-Sep+ Cleanup Tube, 12 mL 50 55296-UPSA/C18/ENVI-Carb™ Cleanup Tube, 12 mL 50 55286-UPSA/C18 Cleanup Tube, 12 mL 50 55229-UPSA/ENVI-Carb Cleanup Tube 1, 12 mL 50 55230-UPSA/ENVI-Carb Cleanup Tube 2, 12 mL 50 55233-UPSA Cleanup Tube, 12 mL 50 55228-UEmpty Centrifuge Tube, 50 mL 50 55248-USLB®-5ms Capillary GC Columns30 m x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 µm 1 28471-U30 m x 0.25 mm I.D., 0.50 µm 1 28473-U20 m x 0.18 mm I.D., 0.18 µm 1 28564-U20 m x 0.18 mm I.D., 0.36 µm 1 28576-UAnalytical SolventsAcetonitrile, for pesticide residue analysis 34481
Pesticide RecoveryReplicates of unspiked and spiked samples were analyzed so that recovery data could be calculated. The MS was operated in the SIM mode to achieve better sensitivity. The recoveries were better with Z-Sep+ for almost all pesticides, with greater reproducibility (Figure 3). Recovery data for several pesticides could not be determined in extracts after PSA/C18 cleanup due to the presence of high amounts of sample matrix.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
% R
ecov
ery
Pesticides
Analyte Recovery of Selected Pesticides from Avocado
PSA/C18 CleanupZ-Sep+ Cleanup
Figure 3. Analyte Recovery and Spread (n=3)
12 14 16 18 20 22 24Time (min)
PSA/C18 Cleanup
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Time (min)
Z-Sep+ Cleanup
column: SLB-5ms, 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D., 0.36 µm (28576-U) oven: 70 °C (2 min), 15 °C/min to 325 °C (5 min) inj. temp.: Programmed, 60 °C (0.28 min), 600 °C/min to 325 °C (5 min) detector: MS (SIM mode) carrier gas: helium, 1 mL/min constant injection: 10 µL LVI, PTV solvent vent, rapid injection speed; split vent flow: 100 mL/min (5 psi) until 0.28 min, 60 mL/min at 2.78 min liner: 4 mm I.D., split type, wool packed FocusLiner™ with single taper design
ChromatographyBelow are GC-MS (full scan) chromatograms of two extracts – one after cleanup with Z-Sep+ sorbent and one after cleanup with PSA/C18 sorbent (Figure 4). The Z-Sep+ chromatogram exhibits significantly less matrix interference. The Z-Sep+ sorbent is a great cleanup sorbent choice for fatty foods prior to pesticide analysis. It removes more unwanted matrix, and results in better analyte recoveries.